<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Confirmed: BMW working on 4 cylinder turbo, may come to U.S.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/12/confirmed-bmw-working-on-4-cylinder-turbo-may-come-to-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/12/confirmed-bmw-working-on-4-cylinder-turbo-may-come-to-u-s/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/12/confirmed-bmw-working-on-4-cylinder-turbo-may-come-to-u-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ice/" rel="tag">I.C.E.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/bmw-concept-1-series-tii-1/453395/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/bmw_1-tii-%282%29lo.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><strong><em><small>Click above for high-res photo gallery of the BMW Concept 1 Series tii</small></em><small></small></strong><small></small><br /></div>
<br /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/04/rumormill-bmw-considering-four-cylinder-3-series-for-u-s/">Rumors</a> of a new four cylinder engine from BMW have been <a href="http://www.bimmerfile.com/2008/09/10/confirmed-new-4-cylinder-in-development/">confirmed</a> by BMW's North American leader Jim O'Donnell. Questions on whether it will be offered in the United States, though, are still very much in the air. "We can't really confirm or deny when it is going to come into the US, or if it is going to come into the US, until after the election and the government makes it clear what is going to be the platform that manufacturers have got to work to," says O'Donnell. It really seems so simple to us. If an automaker has a new engine that offers both good performance and good fuel economy, it should be offered in the U.S. market. <br /><br />Granted, the last effort to sell four-cylinder Bimmers in the States didn't go over so well. But BMW's reputation was earned first by cars like the 2002, which was motivated by a sprightly little four-banger. Considering the fact that BMW owns the MINI brand, the automaker should know better than anyone else that Americans are now willing to spend a good deal of money on small cars with small engines. We'll gladly support a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/bmw-approves-tii-versions-of-1-and-3-series/">revival of the tii badge</a> on a lightweight 1 Series platform powered by a nice turbo four.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/bmw-concept-1-series-tii-1">BMW Concept 1 Series tii</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/bmw-concept-1-series-tii-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/concept_1er_tii08_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/bmw-concept-1-series-tii-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/concept_1er_tii09_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/bmw-concept-1-series-tii-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/concept_1er_tii10_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/bmw-concept-1-series-tii-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/concept_1er_tii11_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/bmw-concept-1-series-tii-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/concept_1er_tii12_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.bimmerfile.com/2008/09/10/confirmed-new-4-cylinder-in-development/">BimmerFile</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/12/confirmed-bmw-working-on-4-cylinder-turbo-may-come-to-u-s/">Confirmed: BMW working on 4 cylinder turbo, may come to U.S.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bimmerfile.com/2008/09/10/confirmed-new-4-cylinder-in-development/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/12/confirmed-bmw-working-on-4-cylinder-turbo-may-come-to-u-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1311551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/12/confirmed-bmw-working-on-4-cylinder-turbo-may-come-to-u-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>bmw 1-series</category><category>bmw 2002</category><category>bmw four cylinder engines</category><category>bmw tii</category><category>Bmw1-series</category><category>Bmw2002</category><category>BmwFourCylinderEngines</category><category>BmwTii</category><category>turbo 4</category><category>turbo bmw</category><category>turbo four</category><category>Turbo4</category><category>TurboBmw</category><category>TurboFour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1311551/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/09/12/confirmed-bmw-working-on-4-cylinder-turbo-may-come-to-u-s/1311551/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1311551</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/bmw_1-tii-%282%29lo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Camaros, turbos, mpgs and the underappreciated V8]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/18/camaros-turbos-mpgs-and-the-underappreciated-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/18/camaros-turbos-mpgs-and-the-underappreciated-v8/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/18/camaros-turbos-mpgs-and-the-underappreciated-v8/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/opinion-editorial/" rel="tag">Opinion/Editorial</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/camaro-angle-3-4-concept-resized.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />The <a href="http://blog.gmnext.com/?p=163">GMnext blog</a> has a post up that talks about the potential viability of a low-displacement turbocharged motor -- the direct-injected 2.0L Ecotec turbo, specifically -- in upcoming GM cars, including the Camaro. Let's talk about this a little. The breathed-upon Ecotec delivers 260 horses and 260 lb-ft of torque, and if you've driven, say, the Sky or Solstice equipped with it, you know just how ballsy it really is. It's more powerful (but less torquey) than either V8 offered in the '87 IROC-Z that I thought was so cool back during high school. The turbo four might well be a nice solution in a future iteration of the Camaro, but is the fuel economy argument for it as rock solid as it might seem on the surface?<br /><br />The Pontiac Solstice GXP with the turbo four has an EPA fuel economy rating of 19 city/28 hwy when mated to a 5-speed manual. Not bad at all for the performance it delivers, but that same drivetrain in the bigger, heavier Camaro isn't likely to give you equal returns in terms of fuel consumption. Over at <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/05/17/gmnext-talks-about-turbo-four-cylinder-camaros/">AutoblogGreen</a>, Sam notes that the 2.0 turbo's lighter weight relative to the six- and eight-cylinders the Camaro's going to launch with should help somewhat. He follows by reminding us that GM's next-gen mild hybrid system will work with RWD cars and predicts that we'll see a 2.0T hybrid Camaro by 2011 or so. This would dovetail neatly with the first phase of the new CAFE regs, and we're sure GM would find a way to engineer a hypothetical turbo/hybrid's fuel economy numbers so they'd play nice within Uncle Sam's rules. Great.<br /><br />The issue with all this talk of four-cylinder turbos and hybrids for a muscle car (along with attempts to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/mark-laneve-camaro-wont-be-positioned-as-a-muscle-car/">redefine</a> the class and reset expectations) is that everyone conveniently overlooks just how good the existing V8 is. In the 2008 Corvette Coupe, the big bad 6.2L LS3 is rated at 16 city/26 hwy. Hardly a guzzler in the traditional sense, the V8's rating isn't that far off from the direct-injected Ecotec turbo. Furthermore, the V8's fuel economy comes with 430 horsepower and 424 lb-ft of torque. Those are numbers befitting a muscle car like a Camaro. Who's to say a direct-injected LS-family V8 with efficiency tech like hybridization and/or cylinder deactivation wouldn't be just as effective at meeting the federal fuel economy requirements that begin taking effect a few years from now? You could potentially satisfy the government-created CAFE gods without giving the customers who want actual, traditional muscle the finger in the process. Yes, the consensus seems to be that smaller engines will be a necessity across the board in the new CAFE era, but let's not summarily ignore the bigger ones just because they're big.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/18/camaros-turbos-mpgs-and-the-underappreciated-v8/">Camaros, turbos, mpgs and the underappreciated V8</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 18 May 2008 11:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/18/camaros-turbos-mpgs-and-the-underappreciated-v8/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1198715/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/18/camaros-turbos-mpgs-and-the-underappreciated-v8/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>camaro</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>turbo four</category><category>TurboFour</category><category>turbos</category><category>v8</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 11:41:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1198715/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/05/18/camaros-turbos-mpgs-and-the-underappreciated-v8/1198715/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1198715</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/camaro-angle-3-4-concept-resized_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
