<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ripsaw MS1: Fastest two-track vehicle on terra firma?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/15/ripsaw-ms1-touted-as-fastest-two-track-vehicle-on-terra-firma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/15/ripsaw-ms1-touted-as-fastest-two-track-vehicle-on-terra-firma/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/15/ripsaw-ms1-touted-as-fastest-two-track-vehicle-on-terra-firma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><a href="http://www.howeandhowe.com/ripsaw.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/ripsaw.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"> <script> var digg_url = 'http://digg.com/design/Ripsaw_MS1_A_Cobra_H_I_S_S_for_the_people_You_decide_Pic_Vid'; </script> <script src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>This is the Ripsaw MS1, a scratch-built tracked vehicle created by Howe &amp; Howe productions. It's very fast -- its 650-horsepower blown 427 CID V8 rockets it from 0-50 in 3.5 seconds and lets it run up to 80 mph. It's also very agile, sporting a suspension with fourteen inches of travel that lets it handle bumpy terrain with aplomb. In fact, the Howe &amp; Howe guys say it's the fastest tracked vehicle <em>anywhere</em>. We can't verify that, but based on the video embedded after the jump, it's clear that the Ripsaw does indeed have some serious giddyup. Lastly, based on the photo above, it can probably be made to look like a <a href="http://www.yojoe.com/vehicles/83/hiss/">Cobra H.I.S.S. tank</a> with a some extra effort, increasing its awesome factor by an order of magnitude. Who do we write the check out to?<br /><br />Follow the jump to see it in action!<br /><br />[Source: Howe &amp; Howe Productions via <a href="http://www.dieselstation.com/content/view/623/1/">Dieselstation</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/15/ripsaw-ms1-touted-as-fastest-two-track-vehicle-on-terra-firma/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ripsaw MS1: Fastest two-track vehicle on terra firma?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/15/ripsaw-ms1-touted-as-fastest-two-track-vehicle-on-terra-firma/">Ripsaw MS1: Fastest two-track vehicle on terra firma?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.howeandhowe.com/ripsaw.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/15/ripsaw-ms1-touted-as-fastest-two-track-vehicle-on-terra-firma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/918428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/15/ripsaw-ms1-touted-as-fastest-two-track-vehicle-on-terra-firma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>howe 7 howe</category><category>Howe7Howe</category><category>ripsaw</category><category>ripsaw ms1</category><category>RipsawMs1</category><category>tank</category><category>tracked</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[No tanks necessary: Russian luxury personnel carrier]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/no-tanks-necessary-russian-luxury-personnel-carrier/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/no-tanks-necessary-russian-luxury-personnel-carrier/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/no-tanks-necessary-russian-luxury-personnel-carrier/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a></p><p><a href="http://www.luxist.com/2006/10/16/luxury-vehicle-for-war-zones/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/military-vehicle_12.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Is the armored Mercedes-Benz S600 Guard not enough? How about a luxury tank?</p>
<p>This amphibious Russian combat reconnaissance/patrol vehicle was purchased by a Russian oligarch and retrofitted with a host of luxury equipment including a full leather interior with wood trim, plus night-vision, hi-fi stereo system, sat-nav and television with DVD player. </p>
<p>Being an amphibious vehicle, it can go in the water too, and has a periscope mounted to the roof to help the driver see where he's going and sonar to see what lies beneath. Get stuck on land? It's got extra wheels hidden underneath that can be deployed as needed. The thing <strike>ways</strike> weighs a few tons, and is powered by a 5.5-liter V8 diesel.</p>
<p>And here you thought the Hummer and G-wagon were the ultimate in luxury paramilitary vehicles. Park it next to your Aston Martin and you've got your own little James Bond flick goin' on. </p>
<p><em>(Follow the jump for more images.)</em></p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://englishrussia.com/?p=381">English Russia</a> via Luxist]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/no-tanks-necessary-russian-luxury-personnel-carrier/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>No tanks necessary: Russian luxury personnel carrier</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/no-tanks-necessary-russian-luxury-personnel-carrier/">No tanks necessary: Russian luxury personnel carrier</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.luxist.com/2006/10/16/luxury-vehicle-for-war-zones/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/no-tanks-necessary-russian-luxury-personnel-carrier/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/694308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/no-tanks-necessary-russian-luxury-personnel-carrier/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amphibious</category><category>luxury</category><category>personnel</category><category>tank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM gets wise, will again pay for full tank of gas upon delivery]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/gm-gets-wise-reinstates-full-tank-of-gas-upon-delivery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/gm-gets-wise-reinstates-full-tank-of-gas-upon-delivery/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/gm-gets-wise-reinstates-full-tank-of-gas-upon-delivery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/123898182_03a4bd4162.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />You may recall last week we told you that GM was <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/gm-decides-to-split-cost-of-gas-with-dealers/">no longer going to cover the cost</a> of a full tank of gas for newly purchased cars and trucks. Instead, it would only reimburse a portion of each tank's cost, and dealers would be responsible for the rest. One of our readers who shall remain anonymous has come across another dealer communiqu&eacute; from GM Vice President of Industry Dealer Affairs William Powell that rescinds the company's original penny-pinching policy. The notice explains that GM originally decided to change its fuel fill reimbursement policy based upon "the changing business conditions and competitive environment." Apparently its dealers clued General Motors in on the fact that "a complete fuel fill was viewed as an integral element in the delivery of GM vehicles." Who knows, maybe this whole blog thing had something to do with it, too.<br /><br />Anonymous thanks for the tip!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/gm-gets-wise-reinstates-full-tank-of-gas-upon-delivery/">GM gets wise, will again pay for full tank of gas upon delivery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/gm-gets-wise-reinstates-full-tank-of-gas-upon-delivery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/659617/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/gm-gets-wise-reinstates-full-tank-of-gas-upon-delivery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dealers</category><category>fill up</category><category>FillUp</category><category>fuel</category><category>gas</category><category>new car</category><category>NewCar</category><category>tank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM decides to split cost of gas with dealers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/gm-decides-to-split-cost-of-gas-with-dealers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/gm-decides-to-split-cost-of-gas-with-dealers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/gm-decides-to-split-cost-of-gas-with-dealers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.jalopnik.com/cars/news/gm-says-to-dealers-no-gas-for-you-195512.php"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/123898182_03a4bd4162.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>It seems <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/04/mazda-responds-to-rx-8-community-s-anger-over-leaked-video/">no dealer communication is safe</a> these days, as Jalopnik came across a communiqu&eacute; from General Motors to its dealer bodies that explains the company will no longer reimburse dealers for a full tank of gas upon delivery. Instead, GM will give dealerships $20 for cars and $30 for trucks. You can do the math, but these days $20 will get you 6.67 gallons of 3$/gallon gas and $30 will score 10 gallons. Though dealers will be expected to pick up the tab for the difference initially, one can see a time fast approaching where consumers will be paying for part or all of their first tank of gasoline. <br /><br />Follow the jump for a breakdown list of what GM considers a car and a truck in its fleet. For example, the truck-based SSR is considered a car and the car-based HHR is considered a truck. The truck column is about half trucks and body-on-frame SUVs, and half unibody SUVs and CUVs.<br /><br />[Source: Jalopnik]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/gm-decides-to-split-cost-of-gas-with-dealers/">GM decides to split cost of gas with dealers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/gm-decides-to-split-cost-of-gas-with-dealers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/657028/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/gm-decides-to-split-cost-of-gas-with-dealers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cost of gas</category><category>CostOfGas</category><category>dealer</category><category>dealers</category><category>dealership</category><category>gas</category><category>gasoline</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>tank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Autoblog Maintenance 101: In-tank fuel pump R&amp;R]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/03/autoblog-maintenance-101-in-tank-fuel-pump-randr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/03/autoblog-maintenance-101-in-tank-fuel-pump-randr/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/03/autoblog-maintenance-101-in-tank-fuel-pump-randr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/maintenance/" rel="tag">Maintenance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/pump-rr-intro.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></p>
<p>If you own enough vehicles with an electric fuel pump, eventually it's likely that your luck will run out and you'll find yourself with a vehicle that refuses to operate properly due to a lack of go-juice. Most modern vehicles place the pump in the tank where it can be kept cool with a constant bath of fuel, but this location isn't so ideal when it comes time to replace that troublesome component. Fortunately, the task usually isn't quite as daunting as it may first appear, and tackling this project yourself can save several hundred dollars. </p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/03/autoblog-maintenance-101-in-tank-fuel-pump-randr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Autoblog Maintenance 101: In-tank fuel pump R&amp;R</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/03/autoblog-maintenance-101-in-tank-fuel-pump-randr/">Autoblog Maintenance 101: In-tank fuel pump R&amp;R</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/03/autoblog-maintenance-101-in-tank-fuel-pump-randr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/648640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/03/autoblog-maintenance-101-in-tank-fuel-pump-randr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fuel</category><category>garage</category><category>gas</category><category>in-tank</category><category>maintenance</category><category>pressure</category><category>project</category><category>pump</category><category>tank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>