<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ad Analysis: Which Super Bowl commercials won and lost last night? [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><a href="/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/#continued"><img height="440" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/super-bowl-commercials-628.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
From kickoff through the blackout and on to the Baltimore Ravens walking away victorious at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/super+bowl/">Super Bowl XLVII</a>, advertising analysts were tracking the impact of all those very expensive commercials. Automakers and their agencies were no exception here, which means there's been plenty of data logged in terms of which car spots actually succeeded or flopped.<br />
<br />
Of course, as next-day results can't exactly be measured by counting up how many folks ran out and bought a new car, judging audience reaction can be a tricky business. As evidence, we've read through (and watched) some early analysis pieces from various sources, and none of them can agree on which commercial was the most powerful of the night. Not even close, in fact.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="pull-quote pull-quote-right">
	<p>
		We've read through the early analysis from various sources, and none of them can agree on which commercial was the most powerful of the night. Not even close.</p>
</blockquote>
"Lift" is a common marketing term and basis for measuring the success of a particular piece of advertising; the term refers roughly to the improvement in audience response to a product after viewing the advertisement. Using data from <em>Edmunds</em> about the lift generated by auto commercials during the big game, <em>The Truth About Cars</em> reported that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a> was the night's big winner. TTAC maintained that the CLA <em>Soul</em> advertisement generated a whopping 3,067% of lift when it aired in the fourth quarter. The report also indicated that Volkswagen's <em><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/28/vw-debuts-get-happy-super-bowl-ad/">Get Happy</a> </em>ad and Lincoln's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/02/lincolns-second-more-traditional-super-bowl-commercial/"><em>Phoenix</em></a> spot for the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mkz/">MKZ</a> were among the poorest performers on the night.<br />
<br />
In an entirely separate study, car-number crunchers Autometrics had some dramatically different results (see the press release, <a href="/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/#continued">below</a>). In its report, Autometrics found the Lincoln MKZ spot to be the most successful of the evening, with an event-leading 42% "Share of Lift" and a massive 5,800% increase in "prospects."<br />
<br />
Moving into anecdotal review of the commercials, we see some evidence that the tenderhearted ads from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram/">Ram</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeep</a> were winners on the evening. <em>USA Today </em>interviewed former General Motors and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> marketing chief <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/why-gms-chief-marketer-was-shown-the-door/">Joel Ewanick</a>, who personally found Ram's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/03/chrysler-uses-super-bowl-spots-to-honor-troops-farmers/"><em>Farmer</em></a> commercial to be the most compelling. Ewanick reportedly considered Jeep's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/03/chrysler-uses-super-bowl-spots-to-honor-troops-farmers/"><em>Whole Again</em></a> tribute to American servicemen and servicewomen to be the "second-best" spot. Of course, if you ask media expert Frank Luntz of CBS to talk about his reaction data, he'll tell you that <em>Farmer</em> was one of the least successful ads of the game, while Kia's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/30/behold-kias-space-babies-super-bowl-commercial/"><em>Space Babies</em></a> commercial was the toast of the Super Bowl as far as car makers go. Oh, and Luntz also claims that the CLA spot that the <em>Edmunds</em> data loved was "not distinguishable." Go figure. Scroll down to watch the CBS breakdown video, <a href="/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/#continued">below</a>.<br />
<br />
Who's ready for that test drive now?<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ad Analysis: Which Super Bowl commercials won and lost last night? [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/">Ad Analysis: Which Super Bowl commercials won and lost last night? [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20447986/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl car commercials</category><category>super bowl commercials</category><category>super bowl winners losers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seyth Miersma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20447986/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/04/ad-analysis-which-super-bowl-commercials-won-and-lost-last-nigh/20447986/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20447986</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/super-bowl-commercials-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>