<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai car prices set to rise]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/16/hyundai-car-prices-set-to-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/16/hyundai-car-prices-set-to-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/16/hyundai-car-prices-set-to-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080715/ANE02/63374683/1036/rss03&amp;rssfeed=rss03"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/hyundai_logo_250op.jpg"  alt="" /></a>The skyrocketing cost of commodities like steel and aluminum have pushed <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/23/gm-launching-zero-percent-financing-sale-raises-prices-by-3-5-p/">several automakers</a> to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/27/toyota-considering-price-hikes-in-the-future/">raise the price</a> of 2009 models. Hyundai is bumping the price of its 2009 models an average of two-percent to help cushion the blow in Korea and in the States. The price of steel has risen 60 percent in a little over a year, and other commodities are up over 20 percent as well. That's bad news for all automakers, and Hyundai expects the trend to continue. Hyundai's Kia brand stlil hasn't announce price hikes, but we're guessing the economical car maker will follow in big brother's foot steps.
<p> </p>
<p>To further complicate matters for the Korean automaker, its unionized workforce is unsatisfied with wages. The rank and file have scheduled four-hour work stoppages for Wednesday and Friday. Unless the government intervenes in the matter, the union will likely get some kind of wage increase, giving Hyundai and Kia yet another justification for raising prices.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080715/ANE02/63374683/1036/rss03&amp;rssfeed=rss03">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req.]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/16/hyundai-car-prices-set-to-rise/">Hyundai car prices set to rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20080715/ANE02/63374683/1036/rss03&amp;rssfeed=rss03>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/16/hyundai-car-prices-set-to-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1256077/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/16/hyundai-car-prices-set-to-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car prices</category><category>CarPrices</category><category>commodity prices</category><category>CommodityPrices</category><category>Hyundai</category><category>steel prices</category><category>SteelPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HItting $2,500 difficult for Tata's Nano as steel prices rise]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/hitting-2-500-difficult-for-tatas-nano-as-steel-prices-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/hitting-2-500-difficult-for-tatas-nano-as-steel-prices-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/hitting-2-500-difficult-for-tatas-nano-as-steel-prices-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tata/" rel="tag">Tata</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/nano.jpg" /><br /><br />The Tata Nano exudes frugality, and when you're trying to build a capable vehicle for a paltry<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/10/what-2-500-buys-in-india-tata-nano-unveiled/"> $2,500</a>, that's not exactly unexpected. Unfortunately for the Indian automaker, the quickly rising cost of steel may thwart plans to hit the magic price-point. The price of steel has risen by 50 percent in less than a year, and even though the little Nano is only 1,300 lbs, when you're making an econobox on the mega-cheap, every penny counts. Like US automakers have done in the past, Tata is looking to its suppliers to shoulder some of the financial burden. Amazingly, the suppliers are okay with that, provided that Tata does its share.<br /><br />Even with concessions from suppliers, it's still up in the air as to whether Tata will achieve its lofty target. It appears using a nice round price as a selling point for a vehicle that's a year away wasn't such a good idea after all. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080707/ANA03/807070356/1128/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/hitting-2-500-difficult-for-tatas-nano-as-steel-prices-rise/">HItting $2,500 difficult for Tata's Nano as steel prices rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080707/ANA03/807070356/1128/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/hitting-2-500-difficult-for-tatas-nano-as-steel-prices-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1247092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/hitting-2-500-difficult-for-tatas-nano-as-steel-prices-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2500 car</category><category>2500Car</category><category>steel prices</category><category>SteelPrices</category><category>tata nano</category><category>TataNano</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Surging steel prices cost automakers $500 more per vehicle]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/surging-steel-prices-cost-automakers-500-more-per-vehicle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/surging-steel-prices-cost-automakers-500-more-per-vehicle/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/surging-steel-prices-cost-automakers-500-more-per-vehicle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080602/ANA03/806020368/1178/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/dscf4626_opt.jpg" /></a>A few years ago, high(ish) gas prices and fierce competition had Detroit automakers talking about the "perfect storm" that the domestic industry was facing. Fast forward to 2008 and the entire auto industry, not just U.S. automakers, is in a full-blown tsunami. Gas is $4 per gallon, the U.S. is muddling its way through some seriously wobbly financial times, and now the price of steel has nearly doubled in five months to $1,035 per ton. Since just this January, the cost of steel in your automobile has risen $500 <em>per car</em>. The reasons for the sharp incline in prices includes both the increased cost of energy for steel makers and higher demand for the strong stuff coming from rapid growth in countries like China and India.
<p> </p>
<p>With everybody feeling the pinch of high materials, which also includes sharp increases in platinum and aluminum, suppliers are passing these costs on to OEMs, who in turn will be passing them on to us. That means we may soon be paying a lot more for our next vehicle. With rising gas prices, inflation, and a weak U.S. economy, car customers appear to be experiencing their own little thunder storm, too.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080602/ANA03/806020368/1178/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01">Automotive News</a> - sub. req'd]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/surging-steel-prices-cost-automakers-500-more-per-vehicle/">Surging steel prices cost automakers $500 more per vehicle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080602/ANA03/806020368/1178/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/surging-steel-prices-cost-automakers-500-more-per-vehicle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1212204/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/surging-steel-prices-cost-automakers-500-more-per-vehicle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>Ford</category><category>GM</category><category>steel prices</category><category>SteelPrices</category><category>suppliers</category><category>Toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. automakers call for end to steel tariffs]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/u-s-automakers-call-for-end-to-steel-tariffs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/u-s-automakers-call-for-end-to-steel-tariffs/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/u-s-automakers-call-for-end-to-steel-tariffs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/daimlerchrysler/" rel="tag">Daimler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.americaslibrary.gov/es/pa/es_pa_steel_1_e.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/steelmill.jpg" /></a>The Big Six U.S. automakers (General Motors, Ford Motor, Toyota Motor, DaimlerChrysler, Honda Motor and Nissan Motor) are calling for the U.S. International Trade Commission to put an end to heavy tariffs on imported steel. Current tariffs boost the price of high-grade steel from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan and Korea by about 30 percent, at a time when automakers are struggling with steel prices that have skyrocketed 68 percent in the past two years.<br /><br />On the other side of the fence is the U.S. steel industry, which lobbied hard for the tariffs in the early '90s to prevent its foreign competitors from dumping cheap steel into the U.S. market at prices the domestic producers couldn't match. <br /><br />Automakers contend that the steel industry no longer needs protective tariffs to compete, while the Steel Manufacturers Association contends that removing the protection would damage the industry while providing insignificant cost benefit to the automakers. <br /><br />Considering that GM alone buys about 10 million tons of steel annually, we're guessing that the automakers have a pretty strong case, and with the U.S. steel industry employing about 150,000, vs. the auto industry's 2.4 million workers, it's not hard to see which side should be able to muster the greatest political support.<br /><br />[Source: The Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/u-s-automakers-call-for-end-to-steel-tariffs/">U.S. automakers call for end to steel tariffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061006/AUTO01/610060339/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/u-s-automakers-call-for-end-to-steel-tariffs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/680675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/u-s-automakers-call-for-end-to-steel-tariffs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>steel</category><category>steel prices</category><category>steel tariff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>