<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ten Las Vegas DMV employees indicted for falsifying emissions tests]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ten-las-vegas-dmv-employees-indicted-for-falsifying-emissions-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ten-las-vegas-dmv-employees-indicted-for-falsifying-emissions-te/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ten-las-vegas-dmv-employees-indicted-for-falsifying-emissions-te/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/January/10-enrd-015.html"><img width="300" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/emissionspass.jpg"  alt="Emissions pass" /></a>Emissions tests are often part of the registration renewal ritual for many car owners. Some appreciate being able to breathe deeply, others see it as a de facto tax, while still another group of automotive unfortunates have cars that won't pass without much expensive work. Whether for purely financial reasons, or a chafing anti-authoritarianism, some drivers elect to circumvent the system. <br />
<br />
Federal indictments have been handed down to 10 Nevada emissions testers for falsifying emissions tests. The ten testers allegedly accepted cash stipends for "clean scanning" a car. Normally during a Nevada emissions test, vehicles are plugged in via their OBD-II port and the Vehicle Identification Number is entered into a computer. The computer then scans the car's on-board system and passes or fails the automobile. "Clean scanning" is a deception whereby a different vehicle, one that will pass, is connected to the computer, and the VIN of a failing car is entered. More than 1,000 vehicles are believed to have been falsely passed this way by the indicted. <br />
<br />
Fooling around with the federal Environmental Protection Agency has these 10 individuals facing up to two years of incarceration and maximum fines of $250,000 per person. Is it mere coincidence that this high-stakes game of palm greasing happened in Vegas?<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/January/10-enrd-015.html">U.S. Department of Justice</a> | Image: <span class="byline">David McNew/Getty</span>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ten-las-vegas-dmv-employees-indicted-for-falsifying-emissions-te/">Ten Las Vegas DMV employees indicted for falsifying emissions tests</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/January/10-enrd-015.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ten-las-vegas-dmv-employees-indicted-for-falsifying-emissions-te/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19309866/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ten-las-vegas-dmv-employees-indicted-for-falsifying-emissions-te/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clean scanning</category><category>CleanScanning</category><category>emissions fraud</category><category>emissions test</category><category>emissions test fraud</category><category>emissions tester indictment</category><category>emissions testing</category><category>EmissionsFraud</category><category>EmissionsTest</category><category>EmissionsTesterIndictment</category><category>EmissionsTestFraud</category><category>EmissionsTesting</category><category>las vegas emissions test</category><category>LasVegasEmissionsTest</category><category>nevada emissions</category><category>nevada emissions tester</category><category>nevada smog</category><category>NevadaEmissions</category><category>NevadaEmissionsTester</category><category>NevadaSmog</category><category>smog test fraud</category><category>smog testing</category><category>SmogTestFraud</category><category>SmogTesting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:22:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19309866/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/01/10/ten-las-vegas-dmv-employees-indicted-for-falsifying-emissions-te/19309866/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19309866</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/emissionspass_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Cali may cancel smog exemption from pre-1976 cars]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://echo.bluehornet.com/hostedemail/email.htm?h=31afc503988fa8d53649a090612c23b0&amp;CID=1219948566&amp;ch=B32868D53576214BD2305024AA0EEA25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/carb_san_joaquin.jpg" /></a>In California, home of the strictest car emissions regulations in the U.S., cars produced before 1976 do not need to undergo smog testing. California State Senator Dean Florez has proposed legislation that would remove that exemption for cars registered in the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.<br /><br />What would that mean if it were passed into law? It would mean that as of January 1, 2009, any car registered in a rather large swathe of central California -- from the 1974 Maverick to the 1929 Model A -- would need to pass every current and future smog test. If it didn't, it couldn't be driven.<br /><br />It is theorized that the move comes because state authorities have missed their air quality goals and are now looking at targeting a tiny fraction of cars. Living in LA, we can't speak for Central California, but most of the pre-1976 vehicles we see here sound and run better than the glut of 80's Toyotas puttering down the streets. What vintage car owners fear is that if the legislation becomes law in the San Joaquin Valley, then it's only a matter of time before it gets adopted everywhere. <em>Thanks for the tip, Kevin!</em><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://echo.bluehornet.com/hostedemail/email.htm?h=31afc503988fa8d53649a090612c23b0&amp;CID=1219948566&amp;ch=B32868D53576214BD2305024AA0EEA25">SEMA Action Network</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/">Cali may cancel smog exemption from pre-1976 cars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://echo.bluehornet.com/hostedemail/email.htm?h=31afc503988fa8d53649a090612c23b0&amp;CID=1219948566&amp;ch=B32868D53576214BD2305024AA0EEA25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1149625/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>classic cars</category><category>ClassicCars</category><category>emissions</category><category>emissionsreductions</category><category>smog</category><category>smog reduction</category><category>smog testing</category><category>smogreduction</category><category>SmogTesting</category><category>vintage cars</category><category>VintageCars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1149625/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/1149625/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1149625</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/carb_san_joaquin_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
