<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: GM planning up to nine-week summer shutdowns]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/report-gm-planning-nine-week-summer-shutdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/report-gm-planning-nine-week-summer-shutdown/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/report-gm-planning-nine-week-summer-shutdown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gaDBatZU-iL6izYjRYstqOYiMXZQ"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/gm_plant.jpg" /></a><br /><br />This is what bringing a behemoth back down to the proper size looks like. General Motors is looking for every way to conserve its ever thinning supply of money, and while <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/22/gm-could-renew-total-confidence-program-in-may/">April sales</a> were better, the overall picture is decidedly grim. <br /><br />In a move to conserve resources and hopefully help clear up any inventory buildups, <em>AFP</em> is reporting that The General plans to idle most of its domestic plants this summer - for as long as nine weeks. GM is expected to let its employees know first before any official statements are made, but it is believed that the work stoppage will coincide with GM's normal July shutdown, though there could be staggered closures as early as May. <br /><br />If GM does put its operations into a large-scale hover, it may have a ripple effect on suppliers, many of whom are also holding on by the slimmest of margins. Will the summer be a season of cascading furloughs and bankruptcy announcements? Let's all take a deep breath as we wait to see. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gaDBatZU-iL6izYjRYstqOYiMXZQ">AFP</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/report-gm-planning-nine-week-summer-shutdown/">REPORT: GM planning up to nine-week summer shutdowns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gaDBatZU-iL6izYjRYstqOYiMXZQ>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/report-gm-planning-nine-week-summer-shutdown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1525415/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/report-gm-planning-nine-week-summer-shutdown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gm furlough</category><category>gm layoffs</category><category>gm plant</category><category>gm plant closing</category><category>gm plant closures</category><category>gm plant idle</category><category>gm plant shutdown</category><category>gm summer shutdown</category><category>GmFurlough</category><category>GmLayoffs</category><category>GmPlant</category><category>GmPlantClosing</category><category>GmPlantClosures</category><category>GmPlantIdle</category><category>GmPlantShutdown</category><category>GmSummerShutdown</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>shutdown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford will shut down 10 N.A. plants in early January]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/18/ford-will-shut-down-10-n-a-plants-in-early-january/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/18/ford-will-shut-down-10-n-a-plants-in-early-january/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/18/ford-will-shut-down-10-n-a-plants-in-early-january/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercury/" rel="tag">Mercury</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081217/ANA02/812171554"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/82555968_580op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />A bitingly cold wind is sweeping through the Motor City this day, but the bigger chill continues to be the rapidly increasing number of idle plants from Detroit's automakers. As part of a previously-announced bid to trim first-quarter output by nearly 38%, Ford now says it will shut down ten North American factories the week of January 5. Unlike Chrysler's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/17/chrysler-to-shut-down-plants-for-a-full-month/">planned one month downtime</a> (where they eerily won't commit to start dates), the Blue Oval has confirmed plans to re-light the fires in eight of those plants beginning the week of January 12.<br /><br />That means that during the week of January 5, Ford's only active North American plants will be in Dearborn (<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/17/first-drive-2009-ford-f-150-capability-matters/">F-150</a>), and Kansas City (F-150, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/16/first-drive-2009-ford-escapes-more-of-almost-everything/">Escape</a>/<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-mercury-mariner-hybrid-w-video/">Mercury Mariner</a>). The week of January 12 will see all facilities up save Hermosillo, Mexico (<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/13/first-drive-2010-ford-fusion-hybrid/">Fusion</a>, Milan, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/12/in-the-autoblog-garage-2007-lincoln-mkz-awd/">Lincoln MKZ</a>) and Oakville, Ontario, where the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/17/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-ford-flex-limited-w-video/">Flex</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/30/in-the-autoblog-garage-2007-ford-edge-sel-awd/">Edge</a>, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/03/in-the-autoblog-garage-2007-lincoln-mkx/">MKX</a> are built.<br /><br />Ford is angling to cut down its quarterly output to just 430,000 vehicles, and shutdowns at staggered intervals are expected to continue throughout early next year.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081217/ANA02/812171554">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req. | Photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/18/ford-will-shut-down-10-n-a-plants-in-early-january/">Ford will shut down 10 N.A. plants in early January</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081217/ANA02/812171554>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/18/ford-will-shut-down-10-n-a-plants-in-early-january/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1405666/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/18/ford-will-shut-down-10-n-a-plants-in-early-january/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Assembly plant</category><category>AssemblyPlant</category><category>Blue Oval</category><category>BlueOval</category><category>Cutbacks</category><category>Dearborn</category><category>Edge</category><category>F Series</category><category>F-150</category><category>F-Series</category><category>Flex</category><category>FSeries</category><category>Hermosillo</category><category>Kansas City</category><category>KansasCity</category><category>Manufacturing</category><category>MKX</category><category>Oakville</category><category>shutdown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mitsubishi set to idle Illinois plant for seven weeks]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/10/mitsubishi-set-to-idle-illinois-plant-for-seven-weeks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/10/mitsubishi-set-to-idle-illinois-plant-for-seven-weeks/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/10/mitsubishi-set-to-idle-illinois-plant-for-seven-weeks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mitsubishi/" rel="tag">Mitsubishi</a></p><p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="www.autonews.com/article/20081209/ANA02/812099965/1197"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/2009eclipsegt_01op.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20081209/ANA02/812099965/1197">Slumping sales</a> have pushed Mitsubishi to schedule a production stoppage at their Normal, Illinois plant early next year for a period lasting more than 40 days. The facility, employing 1,568 workers, manufacturers both the Galant and Eclipse. When the assembly line lights go dark between February 16 and April 3, it will signify the longest halt of production since the facility began operation in 1988. The news obviously isn't good, but it thankfully doesn't carry any immediate word about layoffs. According to Mitsubishi, all employees will remain on payroll during the shutdown and be shifted to other non-production jobs, including maintenance and training. </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20081209/ANA02/812099965/1197">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req.]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/10/mitsubishi-set-to-idle-illinois-plant-for-seven-weeks/">Mitsubishi set to idle Illinois plant for seven weeks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20081209/ANA02/812099965/1197>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/10/mitsubishi-set-to-idle-illinois-plant-for-seven-weeks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1396337/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/10/mitsubishi-set-to-idle-illinois-plant-for-seven-weeks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>closure</category><category>layoff</category><category>mitsubishi</category><category>mitsubishi eclipse</category><category>mitsubishi galant</category><category>MitsubishiEclipse</category><category>MitsubishiGalant</category><category>normal</category><category>Normal illinois</category><category>NormalIllinois</category><category>shutdown</category><category>stoppage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM cuts shifts, output at three plants]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/05/gm-cuts-shifts-output-at-three-plants/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/05/gm-cuts-shifts-output-at-three-plants/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/05/gm-cuts-shifts-output-at-three-plants/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a></p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssAutoTruckManufacturers/idUSN0541260520081205"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/gm_logo_opt.jpg" /></a>It's hardly unexpected given recent <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/02/by-the-numbers-november-2008-brother-can-you-spare-a-dime-ed/">gloomy sales numbers</a>, but General Motors announced today that they will be cutting shifts at several North American plants. Unfortunately, nearly 2,000 workers will lose their jobs in the process as GM eliminates its third shift to slow production and ease the backlog of vehicles sitting on dealer lots. The affected plants are Orion, Michigan; Oshawa, Ontario; and Lordstown, Ohio (these plants manufacture the Chevrolet Malibu, Pontiac G6, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Cobalt, and Pontiac G5). The news comes on top of the previously announced idling of the Fairfax assembly plant in Kansas City mid-January. That plant makes the Saturn Aura and also the Chevrolet Malibu.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssAutoTruckManufacturers/idUSN0541260520081205">Reuters</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/05/gm-cuts-shifts-output-at-three-plants/">GM cuts shifts, output at three plants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/05/gm-cuts-shifts-output-at-three-plants/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1392528/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/05/gm-cuts-shifts-output-at-three-plants/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Assembly plant</category><category>AssemblyPlant</category><category>Close</category><category>Fairfax</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Idle</category><category>layoff</category><category>Lordstown</category><category>Orion</category><category>Oshawa</category><category>out of jobs</category><category>OutOfJobs</category><category>Shutdown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[No surprise here: Expedition, Navigator production stopped for nine weeks]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/255578/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/ford-expedition_450_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em>Click on the above image to see our Ford Expedition gallery</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>May was apparently a tough month for Ford's big SUVs. With consumer demand understandably cold for the gargantuan utes and their hard-to-swallow 12 mpg city ratings, Lincoln Navigator sales slid 37 percent while <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/in-the-autoblog-garage-2007-ford-expedition-el/">Ford Expedition</a> sales were down 43 percent. As a result, Ford Motor Company has announced that its Wayne, Michigan, plant that assembles these vehicles will close down for nine weeks starting on Monday. While the plant sits idle, Ford will increase production of its passenger cars to better meet market demand for smaller and much more fuel efficient vehicles. Like we didn't see this coming... </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/">2007 Ford Expedition EL</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-09_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/">2008 Lincoln Navigator</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_005_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080617/ANA02/582348864/1176/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01araudioreview.blogspot.com">Automotive News</a>, subs. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/">No surprise here: Expedition, Navigator production stopped for nine weeks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1228025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Close assembly</category><category>CloseAssembly</category><category>ford expedition</category><category>FordExpedition</category><category>lincoln navigator</category><category>LincolnNavigator</category><category>Production</category><category>shut down</category><category>ShutDown</category><category>Stoppage</category><category>wayne assembly plant</category><category>WayneAssemblyPlant</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Strike against No. 2 car hauler puts it out of business]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uaw-unions/" rel="tag">UAW/Unions</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/ibt-logo-250.jpg" alt="" />The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/09/union-strikes-against-no-2-car-hauler-over-wages/">strike last week</a> by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) against Performance Transportation Services (PTS) was the straw that broke the camel's back. The second largest car hauler in the United States was unable to survive the wage-related dispute, especially after filing for bankruptcy protection in 2006 and 2007. On Friday, PTS announced that it's stopping all operations and going out of business.</p>
<p>The effect on the industry overall will be minor. Automakers began rescheduled their deliveries last week when the strike was announced. As domestic vehicle production has slowed, excess transport capacity has been able to take up the slack and no major interruptions have been seen. It seems the striking workers have also been accommodated as the Teamsters are reporting that the "vast majority" of their 1,250 drivers have found work at other unionized locations. Still, any organized union thinking of striking in this economic climate should consider the possibility that such a move may result in pink slips for everyone.<br /> </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080616/ANA02/735988380/1176/rss02&amp;rssfeed=rss02">Automotive News</a>, subs. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/">Strike against No. 2 car hauler puts it out of business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1226638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>closed</category><category>International Brotherhood of Teamsters</category><category>InternationalBrotherhoodOfTeamsters</category><category>out of business</category><category>OutOfBusiness</category><category>Performance Transportation Services</category><category>PerformanceTransportationServices</category><category>shut down</category><category>ShutDown</category><category>Strike</category><category>UAW</category><category>unemployed</category><category>Work stoppage</category><category>WorkStoppage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler plans summer shutdown, mandatory vacation for workers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/chrysler-plans-summer-shutdown-mandatory-vacation-for-workers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/chrysler-plans-summer-shutdown-mandatory-vacation-for-workers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/chrysler-plans-summer-shutdown-mandatory-vacation-for-workers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a></p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/23613282/for/cnbc/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/chrysler_detail_logo_250-op.jpg"  alt="" /></a>The AP got a hold of an internal email sent to all Chrysler employees informing them in no uncertain terms that they will be taking a vacation from July 7 through July 21. While some kind of plant shutdown is apparently common for most automakers during the summer, this corporate-wide stoppage will also include salaried employees, with the exception of a few teams that will stick around to work on special projects. A Chrysler spokesperson didn't divulge any hard details about the reason for the temporary shutdown, other to say that it should help "boost productivity and efficiency." <br /><br />[Source: AP]<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/chrysler-plans-summer-shutdown-mandatory-vacation-for-workers/">Chrysler plans summer shutdown, mandatory vacation for workers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/23613282/for/cnbc/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/chrysler-plans-summer-shutdown-mandatory-vacation-for-workers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1139468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/chrysler-plans-summer-shutdown-mandatory-vacation-for-workers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CHRYSLER</category><category>chrysler mandatory vacation</category><category>ChryslerMandatoryVacation</category><category>plant</category><category>shutdown</category><category>vacation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM: American Axle strike to slow down or stop 20 plants]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/07/gm-american-axle-strike-to-slow-down-or-stop-20-plants/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/07/gm-american-axle-strike-to-slow-down-or-stop-20-plants/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/07/gm-american-axle-strike-to-slow-down-or-stop-20-plants/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uaw-unions/" rel="tag">UAW/Unions</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080307/AUTO01/803070338/1148"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/striking_worker_ii_opt.jpg" /></a>The 10-day strike between American Axle &amp; Manufacturing Holdings Inc. and the United Auto Workers union is now threatening to idle or partially shut down 13 <em>more</em> GM plants as early as Monday. Although talks are underway again, even a resolution over the weekend may mean closures as it takes time to deliver inventory and ramp up production. As of now, seven assembly plants at GM have already been idled after <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/26/uaw-strikes-again-targets-american-axle-after-talks-end/">the AA workers walked off their jobs on February 26th</a>.</p>
<p>American Axle supplies components to many different automakers, meaning the strike is being felt industry-wide. The strike is hitting GM particularly hard, however, as it does represent some 80% of the supplier's business. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/29/american-axle-strike-causes-gm-to-idle-four-truck-plants/">GM idled four truck plants</a> within days. By yesterday, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/06/striking-uaw-and-american-axle-will-sit-down-and-talk-today/">five GM plants, and seven suppliers were down.</a> Chrysler may also have to idle plants in Delaware and Mexico by mid-next week if both sides don't come to an agreement. </p>
<p>There is light at the end of the tunnel. Reportedly, both sides already agree on the principles of a concession, leaving just the issue of hourly wages on the table. And, as most negotiation experts point out, money differences are often the easiest to solve.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080307/AUTO01/803070338/1148">Detroit News</a>, Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/07/gm-american-axle-strike-to-slow-down-or-stop-20-plants/">GM: American Axle strike to slow down or stop 20 plants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/07/gm-american-axle-strike-to-slow-down-or-stop-20-plants/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1134248/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/07/gm-american-axle-strike-to-slow-down-or-stop-20-plants/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Axle</category><category>AmericanAxle</category><category>Closure</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>Shutdown</category><category>Strike</category><category>UAW</category><category>Walkoff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Porsche proposal busts Bugatti]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bugatti/" rel="tag">Bugatti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/supercars/bugatti-under-threat-by-porsche/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/veyron-doors.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" /></a>That Porsche owns a significant stake in the Volkswagen group (and all its subsidiaries) is no secret. In fact, Porsche is even <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/15/porsche-profits-up-wiedeking-extended-bigger-vw-stake-okd/">in the process of increasing its stake</a>. Oddly, though, little seemed to be done to minimize the competition presented to Porsche products by those of VW divisions: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Porsche 911 Turbo, Audi TT vs. Porsche Boxster and Cayman, Audi Q7 vs. Porsche Cayenne, etc. But now Porsche is reportedly taking aim at an easy target: Bugatti.</p>
<p>Truth be told, it's really Bugatti's lack of profitability that Porsche is targeting. Porsche remains one of the only sportscar manufacturers that generates profit (copious amounts of it, actually), while Bugatti loses VW money continuously. The development costs of the super-expensive Veyron were to be offset by the application of technology towards future Bugatti vehicles (like a new saloon or four-door coupe), but if Porsche gets its way, a new Bugatti will never see the light of day, with Stuttgart evidently preferring to cut their loses (and a competing supercar maker).</p>
<p>Volkswagen would be unlikely to find a buyer for Bugatti even if Porsche applied enough pressure for them to sell. Stuttgart's proposal, then, would be to turn the exclusive marque even more exclusive, as a coachbuilder, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/23/pininfarina-now-taking-orders/">creating unique one-off vehicles (like Jim Glickenhaus' Ferrari P4/5 by Pininfarina)</a> for over $4 million a piece. And here we thought the existing Veyron was expensive....</p>
<p>[Source: Car magazine via Motor Authority]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/">Porsche proposal busts Bugatti</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/news/supercars/bugatti-under-threat-by-porsche/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/707030/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bugatti</category><category>coach</category><category>porsche</category><category>proposal</category><category>sell</category><category>shut down</category><category>ShutDown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan to shut down U.S. plants for six days]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/24/nissan-to-shut-down-u-s-plants-for-six-days/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/24/nissan-to-shut-down-u-s-plants-for-six-days/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/24/nissan-to-shut-down-u-s-plants-for-six-days/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><img width="212" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="294" border="0" align="right"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/canton_11_-Mississippi.jpg" alt="" />In anticipation of its upcoming 2007models arriving, Nissan has decided to swallow a hard pill and shut down production at its three U.S. plants for sixdays by the end of July. Scuttling its plants in Canton, MS and Smyrna and Decherd, TN will trim 18,000 vehicles fromits previously planned production schedule. <br /><br />The first shut down day occurred on April 17, the second willbe May 26th and lengthen the plant's Memorial Day weekend, while the final four will give workers a very largeFourth of July weekend. All six days will be treated as vacation days for employees, which we assume meansthey'll still be on the clock. <br /><br />Additional down days could be added if sales slow even further aheadof the '07 arrivals, which include the Versa Hatchback and Sedan, Sentra, Quest, Altima and Altima Hybrid, andInfinit G35 Sedan. <br /><br />[Source: Nissan]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/24/nissan-to-shut-down-u-s-plants-for-six-days/">Nissan to shut down U.S. plants for six days</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/24/nissan-to-shut-down-u-s-plants-for-six-days/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/611151/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/24/nissan-to-shut-down-u-s-plants-for-six-days/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Canton</category><category>Decherd</category><category>facility</category><category>plant</category><category>scuttle</category><category>shutdown</category><category>Smyrna</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford restructuring tab expected to hit $3.4 billion]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060420/AUTO01/604200369/1148"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/fomoco.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Idling seven factorieswill push Ford's restructuring costs up to a total of $3.4 billion (before taxes) for the year. The figure includesover&nbsp;<!--StartFragment --><span class="indent">$2.1 billion&nbsp;associated with&nbsp;early retirement packages,layoffs, and pension issues, as well as&nbsp;$280 million to close the plants.</span> </p>
<p>The factories&nbsp;on the block so far&nbsp;are the two the automaker announced last week -- St. Paul, Minn. andNorfolk, Va. -- as well as the Wixom, Mich., and Atlanta, Ga.&nbsp;Production at St. Thomas will be cut to oneshift.</p>
<p>[Source: The Detroit News]<span class="indent"></span></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/">Ford restructuring tab expected to hit $3.4 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060420/AUTO01/604200369/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/610238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3.4 billion</category><category>3.4Billion</category><category>Blue Oval</category><category>BlueOval</category><category>Ford Motor Company</category><category>FordMotorCompany</category><category>Layoff</category><category>Plants</category><category>Shut Down</category><category>Shutdown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>