<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[No surprise here: Expedition, Navigator production stopped for nine weeks]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/255578/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/ford-expedition_450_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em>Click on the above image to see our Ford Expedition gallery</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>May was apparently a tough month for Ford's big SUVs. With consumer demand understandably cold for the gargantuan utes and their hard-to-swallow 12 mpg city ratings, Lincoln Navigator sales slid 37 percent while <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/in-the-autoblog-garage-2007-ford-expedition-el/">Ford Expedition</a> sales were down 43 percent. As a result, Ford Motor Company has announced that its Wayne, Michigan, plant that assembles these vehicles will close down for nine weeks starting on Monday. While the plant sits idle, Ford will increase production of its passenger cars to better meet market demand for smaller and much more fuel efficient vehicles. Like we didn't see this coming... </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/">2007 Ford Expedition EL</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-09_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-expedition-el/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/ford-expedition-el-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/">2008 Lincoln Navigator</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-lincoln-navigator/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/08lincnavi_hi_005_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080617/ANA02/582348864/1176/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01araudioreview.blogspot.com">Automotive News</a>, subs. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/">No surprise here: Expedition, Navigator production stopped for nine weeks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1228025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/17/no-surprise-here-expedition-navigator-production-stopped-for-n/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Close assembly</category><category>CloseAssembly</category><category>ford expedition</category><category>FordExpedition</category><category>lincoln navigator</category><category>LincolnNavigator</category><category>Production</category><category>shut down</category><category>ShutDown</category><category>Stoppage</category><category>wayne assembly plant</category><category>WayneAssemblyPlant</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Strike against No. 2 car hauler puts it out of business]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uaw-unions/" rel="tag">UAW/Unions</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/ibt-logo-250.jpg" alt="" />The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/09/union-strikes-against-no-2-car-hauler-over-wages/">strike last week</a> by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) against Performance Transportation Services (PTS) was the straw that broke the camel's back. The second largest car hauler in the United States was unable to survive the wage-related dispute, especially after filing for bankruptcy protection in 2006 and 2007. On Friday, PTS announced that it's stopping all operations and going out of business.</p>
<p>The effect on the industry overall will be minor. Automakers began rescheduled their deliveries last week when the strike was announced. As domestic vehicle production has slowed, excess transport capacity has been able to take up the slack and no major interruptions have been seen. It seems the striking workers have also been accommodated as the Teamsters are reporting that the "vast majority" of their 1,250 drivers have found work at other unionized locations. Still, any organized union thinking of striking in this economic climate should consider the possibility that such a move may result in pink slips for everyone.<br /> </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080616/ANA02/735988380/1176/rss02&amp;rssfeed=rss02">Automotive News</a>, subs. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/">Strike against No. 2 car hauler puts it out of business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1226638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/16/strike-against-no-2-car-hauler-puts-it-out-of-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>closed</category><category>International Brotherhood of Teamsters</category><category>InternationalBrotherhoodOfTeamsters</category><category>out of business</category><category>OutOfBusiness</category><category>Performance Transportation Services</category><category>PerformanceTransportationServices</category><category>shut down</category><category>ShutDown</category><category>Strike</category><category>UAW</category><category>unemployed</category><category>Work stoppage</category><category>WorkStoppage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Porsche proposal busts Bugatti]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bugatti/" rel="tag">Bugatti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/supercars/bugatti-under-threat-by-porsche/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/veyron-doors.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" /></a>That Porsche owns a significant stake in the Volkswagen group (and all its subsidiaries) is no secret. In fact, Porsche is even <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/15/porsche-profits-up-wiedeking-extended-bigger-vw-stake-okd/">in the process of increasing its stake</a>. Oddly, though, little seemed to be done to minimize the competition presented to Porsche products by those of VW divisions: Lamborghini Gallardo vs. Porsche 911 Turbo, Audi TT vs. Porsche Boxster and Cayman, Audi Q7 vs. Porsche Cayenne, etc. But now Porsche is reportedly taking aim at an easy target: Bugatti.</p>
<p>Truth be told, it's really Bugatti's lack of profitability that Porsche is targeting. Porsche remains one of the only sportscar manufacturers that generates profit (copious amounts of it, actually), while Bugatti loses VW money continuously. The development costs of the super-expensive Veyron were to be offset by the application of technology towards future Bugatti vehicles (like a new saloon or four-door coupe), but if Porsche gets its way, a new Bugatti will never see the light of day, with Stuttgart evidently preferring to cut their loses (and a competing supercar maker).</p>
<p>Volkswagen would be unlikely to find a buyer for Bugatti even if Porsche applied enough pressure for them to sell. Stuttgart's proposal, then, would be to turn the exclusive marque even more exclusive, as a coachbuilder, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/23/pininfarina-now-taking-orders/">creating unique one-off vehicles (like Jim Glickenhaus' Ferrari P4/5 by Pininfarina)</a> for over $4 million a piece. And here we thought the existing Veyron was expensive....</p>
<p>[Source: Car magazine via Motor Authority]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/">Porsche proposal busts Bugatti</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/news/supercars/bugatti-under-threat-by-porsche/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/707030/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/24/porsche-proposal-busts-bugatti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bugatti</category><category>coach</category><category>porsche</category><category>proposal</category><category>sell</category><category>shut down</category><category>ShutDown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford restructuring tab expected to hit $3.4 billion]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060420/AUTO01/604200369/1148"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/fomoco.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Idling seven factorieswill push Ford's restructuring costs up to a total of $3.4 billion (before taxes) for the year. The figure includesover&nbsp;<!--StartFragment --><span class="indent">$2.1 billion&nbsp;associated with&nbsp;early retirement packages,layoffs, and pension issues, as well as&nbsp;$280 million to close the plants.</span> </p>
<p>The factories&nbsp;on the block so far&nbsp;are the two the automaker announced last week -- St. Paul, Minn. andNorfolk, Va. -- as well as the Wixom, Mich., and Atlanta, Ga.&nbsp;Production at St. Thomas will be cut to oneshift.</p>
<p>[Source: The Detroit News]<span class="indent"></span></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/">Ford restructuring tab expected to hit $3.4 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060420/AUTO01/604200369/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/610238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/20/restructuring-costs-ford-mucho-dinero/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3.4 billion</category><category>3.4Billion</category><category>Blue Oval</category><category>BlueOval</category><category>Ford Motor Company</category><category>FordMotorCompany</category><category>Layoff</category><category>Plants</category><category>Shut Down</category><category>Shutdown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>