<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: OnStar calls Hennessey after tuned CTS-V pulls .99 g]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/#continued"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/hennessy_ctsv_onstar.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>The 700-hp Hennessy CTS-V meets OnStar -- Click above <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/#continued">to watch video</a></small></strong></em></div>
<br />
On its way to doing the 1/4-mile in 11.07 seconds at 128 mph, a Hennessy-tuned 700-horsepower Cadillac CTS-V hit .99 longitudinal G as it left the start line. By the end of the run the phone inside the car was ringing, and it was your friendly neighborhood OnStar representative wondering "What the hell do you think you're doing?" Ok, not quite... but they did have some questions. Follow the jump <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/#continued">to watch the video</a>. <br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8As1zshWxn0&amp;feature=youtube_gdata">Hennessy</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIDEO: OnStar calls Hennessey after tuned CTS-V pulls .99 g</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/">VIDEO: OnStar calls Hennessey after tuned CTS-V pulls .99 g</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8As1zshWxn0&amp;feature=youtube_gdata>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19208085/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/24/video-onstar-calls-hennessey-after-tuned-cts-v-pulls-99-g/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>14 mile</category><category>14Mile</category><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac cts-v</category><category>CadillacCts-v</category><category>cts-v</category><category>hennessy</category><category>onstar</category><category>quarter mile</category><category>QuarterMile</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Safety concerns cause NHRA to limit races to 1,000 feet]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/03/safety-concerns-cause-nhra-to-limit-races-to-1-000-feet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/03/safety-concerns-cause-nhra-to-limit-races-to-1-000-feet/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/03/safety-concerns-cause-nhra-to-limit-races-to-1-000-feet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.nhra.com/content/news/30355.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="top" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/scott_kalitta_dhl_450.jpg" /></a><br /><br />The NHRA has acted very quickly in an effort to improve the safety of its Top Fuel and Funny Car races. Due to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/22/nhra-driver-scott-kalitta-killed-in-nhra-qualifying/">tragic death</a> recently of '94 and '95 Top Fuel champion Scott Kalitta, the drag strip for these two fastest classes will be <a href="http://www.nhra.com/content/news/30355.htm">shortened</a> from the traditional 1,320 feet to 1,000 feet. Race officials and team managers believe that this compromise will continue to make for an entertaining race as the cars will still be hitting speeds of around 300 mph. This is an interim change as the sanctioning body investigates the crash and its causes, and will stay in effect until more definite changes can be made. The first race which will incorporate the new shorter track length will take place on July 11-13 at the Mopar Mile High Nationals in Denver, Colorado. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.nhra.com/content/news/30355.htm">NHRA</a> via <a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080702/FREE/686860405/1508/newsletter02">AutoWeek</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/03/safety-concerns-cause-nhra-to-limit-races-to-1-000-feet/">Safety concerns cause NHRA to limit races to 1,000 feet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nhra.com/content/news/30355.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/03/safety-concerns-cause-nhra-to-limit-races-to-1-000-feet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1244346/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/03/safety-concerns-cause-nhra-to-limit-races-to-1-000-feet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1000 feet</category><category>1000Feet</category><category>1320</category><category>14 mile</category><category>14Mile</category><category>drag racing</category><category>drag strip</category><category>DragRacing</category><category>DragStrip</category><category>funny car</category><category>funny cars</category><category>FunnyCar</category><category>FunnyCars</category><category>nhra</category><category>quarter mile</category><category>QuarterMile</category><category>top fuel</category><category>TopFuel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: How to move two tons down the quarter-mile in less than ten seconds]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/video-how-to-move-two-tons-down-the-quarter-mile-in-less-than-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/video-how-to-move-two-tons-down-the-quarter-mile-in-less-than-t/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/video-how-to-move-two-tons-down-the-quarter-mile-in-less-than-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><embed width="428" height="352" align="middle" src="http://videos.streetfire.net/vidiac.swf" flashvars="video=2ed94f6c-0238-49c2-87e1-9889000d5650" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" name="ePlayer" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed><br /><br />When the owners of two-ton monsters get together at the annual Southern Super Heavyweight Shootout each November, Sir Issac Newton's laws get put to the test. As evidence, we submit the above video from the 2006 gathering, which pitted Mike Smith's 1995 Impala SS up against Paul Roswell's 1994 Impala SS in the final round of the "Big Dog" bracket. <br /><br />Both cars run somewhat similar powertrain setups, with each ingesting large amounts of nitrous oxide into LT1-based small-blocks that are punched out to 383 cubic inches. GM's bulletproof Turbo 400 is used to deliver the power out back, where Smith's car hangs a Moser-built Ford 9" rear axle from a custom four-link suspension and Roswell's uses GM 8.5" 10-bolt and aftermarket control arms. <br /><br />The result, as demonstrated here, is an extremely fast 10.8-second run at nearly 125 MPH for Roswell's 4400lb Impala - and that's the slower of the two. Smith's 4040lb sedan ran the quarter in 9.7 seconds at just over 138 MPH, courtesy of its more extreme engine and suspension setup. More details on these cars -- and several other rather quick gazelles -- are available <a href="http://dan.esteban.com/impalass/ReturnTopET.asp">here</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/video-how-to-move-two-tons-down-the-quarter-mile-in-less-than-t/">VIDEO: How to move two tons down the quarter-mile in less than ten seconds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/video-how-to-move-two-tons-down-the-quarter-mile-in-less-than-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/727431/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/video-how-to-move-two-tons-down-the-quarter-mile-in-less-than-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drag racing</category><category>DragRacing</category><category>dragstrip</category><category>impala ss</category><category>quarter mile</category><category>southern super heavyweight shootout</category><category>sshs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[13s in the quarter for $1300 - and 30 MPG, too]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/13s-in-the-quarter-for-1300-and-30-mpg-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/13s-in-the-quarter-for-1300-and-30-mpg-too/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/13s-in-the-quarter-for-1300-and-30-mpg-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://www.moparaction.com/extra/13Flat.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/dodge-spirit-rt-(resized-450).jpg" id="vimage_1" /></a></p>
<p>Chrysler's "A Platform" hasn't ever received a whole lot of respect from gearheads, but aside from serving as a useful bridge between the K-car and the cab-forward LH, it also spawned the Dodge Spirit R/T. Acceleration came courtesy of the ubiquitous 2.2 L inline four, but topped with a DOHC 16-valve head, and turbocharged and intercooled for good measure. 224 hp was the result, which matched most domestic V8s of the day. </p>
<p>Positioned in the marketplace against other early-90s four-door rocketships such as the Ford Taurus SHO, Chevrolet Lumina Z34, and Nissan Maxima, it was capable of blasting to 60 MPH from a standing start in less than six seconds. Chrysler called it the "fastest sedan built in America", and even today it'd hold its own against any number of other performance sedans in straight line acceleration. </p>
<p>Less than 1,500 of the R/T models were built in '91 and '92, and so the odds of coming across one are slim. The son of Mopar Action's Rich Ehrenberg managed to score one for $1000, though, and threw another $300 at it to run <a href="http://titsup.mike1023.com/video/spirit_rt/13sec4.wmv">flat 13s at 103 MPH</a>. Oh, yea, and the head gasket wasn't fixed, either. The details here are sketchy - it appears as if we'll have to wait for an upcoming issue of <em>Mopar Action</em> to learn more - but being that the Spirit R/T is a turbocharged car, we're guessing that turning up the wick was a simple matter of wastegate manipulation to increase the boost, and then it became an issue of finding some tires to hook up that power. </p>
<p>[Source: Mopar Action]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/13s-in-the-quarter-for-1300-and-30-mpg-too/">13s in the quarter for $1300 - and 30 MPG, too</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.moparaction.com/extra/13Flat.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/13s-in-the-quarter-for-1300-and-30-mpg-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/659769/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/27/13s-in-the-quarter-for-1300-and-30-mpg-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cheap</category><category>chrysler</category><category>dodge</category><category>drag racing</category><category>performance</category><category>quarter mile</category><category>R/T</category><category>spirit</category><category>SRT4</category><category>turbocharged</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ultima GTR goes for quarter-mile record and gets it]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/22/ultima-gtr-goes-for-quarter-mile-record-and-gets-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/22/ultima-gtr-goes-for-quarter-mile-record-and-gets-it/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/22/ultima-gtr-goes-for-quarter-mile-record-and-gets-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/quartermile1l.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /><br /><br />Not long ago the Ultima GTR broke its own record (again) as the fastest car to achieve 0-100mph-0 for the third year in a row. On that same day it also set new records for 0-60 (2.6 seconds), 0-100 (5.3 seconds) and braking from 100 (3.6 seconds). <br /><br />Mere weeks later it has smashed yet another record. This time it captured the world record for a standing quarter-mile by sprinting 402 meters, 440 yards, and 1,320 feet (all at the same time!) in a mere 9.9 seconds at 143 mph. The record run was achieved in the U.K. at <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.santapod.co.uk%2F&amp;ei=RyGaRInVMo2CiAHSpoXjDg&amp;sig2=nevZEJoENooFShyxzS4xFQ">Santa Pod Raceway</a> in the same car that was used a few weeks back to break the 0-100mph-0 record. It was fitted with a 720-bhp Chevrolet V8 engine from the company's OE engine supplier American Speed, a five-speed G50 transmission and regular old road tires.<br /><br />Here are some comparison figures to put the Ultima GTR's accomplishment in perspective.<br /><strong>Ultima GTR:</strong> 9.9secs @143mph<br /><strong>Ferrari Enzo:</strong> 11.1secs@133mph<br /><strong>Porsche Carrera GT:</strong> 11.3secs@131mph<br /><strong>McLaren F1: </strong>11.6secs@125mph<br /><strong>Saleen S7: </strong>11.8secs@119mph<br /><br />Follow the link to <a href="http://www.ultimasports.co.uk/">Ultima's website</a> to witness the three record runs via streaming video.<br /><br />[Source: Ultima via <a href="http://www.pistonheads.com/news/14233.htm">PistonHeads</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/22/ultima-gtr-goes-for-quarter-mile-record-and-gets-it/">Ultima GTR goes for quarter-mile record and gets it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ultimasports.co.uk/records/part7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/22/ultima-gtr-goes-for-quarter-mile-record-and-gets-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/635758/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/22/ultima-gtr-goes-for-quarter-mile-record-and-gets-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drag racing</category><category>DragRacing</category><category>dragstrip</category><category>quarter mile</category><category>QuarterMile</category><category>Ultima</category><category>Ultima GTR</category><category>UltimaGtr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:56:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>