<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ford confirms 3.2L diesel five-cylinder for US-spec 2014 Transit]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-ford-transit-0/"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/09/fordtransit01-1346892939.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
To ensure that its new <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/transit">2014 Ford Transit</a> will be able to get the job done when it goes on sale in the US next year, <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> announced that its new work van will be offered with a diesel engine that balances power and fuel economy. The Transit is already on sale with the diesel in other markets, but Ford confirmed that the 3.2-liter I5 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/power+stroke/">Power Stroke</a> will mark the return of a diesel engine to its full-size van for the first time since the 6.0-liter Power Stroke V8 was phased out of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/e-series/">E-Series</a> in 2010.<br />
<br />
Power ratings for the US-spec Transit Power Stroke have not been announced yet, but Ford says these engines in European versions of the van are rated at 197 horsepower and 347 pound-feet of torque - 90 percent of the engine's torque will be available between 1,700 rpm and 3,500 rpm. Although these figures are far less than the most recent Power Stroke in the E-Series rated at 235 hp and 440 lb-ft, this new engine is expected to be cleaner and more efficient. Ford expects the new Power Stroke to be able to run on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/b20/">B20</a> biodiesel fuel.<br />
<br />
The 3.2-liter Power Stroke will be built in South Africa and exported to the Ford Kansas City Assembly Plant where the Transit will be built. In addition to the new diesel engine, the Transit will also be available with the 3.5-liter <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ecoboost/">EcoBoost</a> V6, and all engines will be paired with six-speed automatic transmissions.<br />
<br />
Scroll down to read Ford's official press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford confirms 3.2L diesel five-cylinder for US-spec 2014 Transit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/">Ford confirms 3.2L diesel five-cylinder for US-spec 2014 Transit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20397053/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2014 ford transit</category><category>3.2l power stroke</category><category>diesel</category><category>ford</category><category>ford diesel</category><category>power stroke</category><category>powerstroke</category><category>transit</category><category>transit diesel</category><category>work truck</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20397053/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/10/ford-confirms-3-2l-diesel-five-cylinder-for-us-spec-2014-transit/20397053/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20397053</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/09/fordtransit01-1346892939_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[From Super Duty to Call of Duty: Ford could power U.S. military's future]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/military/" rel="tag">Military</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/#continued"><img alt="Joint Light Tactical Vehicle proposal" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/jltv.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 444px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The future of the U.S. Army's Joint Light Tactical Vehicle program might be powered by a <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> V8. BAE Systems, Northrup Grumman and Meritor Defenses said this afternoon that their proposed light fighting vehicle, which is called the Valanx, will have a Ford <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/power+stroke+diesel/">Power Stroke 6.7-liter diesel engine</a> under its steel hood. (And likely a .50 cal on its roof.)<br />
<br />
If it's good enough for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-series+super+duty/">Super Duty</a>, it's good enough for a Call of Duty.<br />
<br />
"Ford products have a reputation for dependability and performance, even under challenging conditions," said Ann Hoholick, BAE Systems Vice President of Amphibious &amp; New Programs in the release.<br />
<br />
Ford had dropped out of the JLTV program, which is searching for the next fighting machine to replace the venerable <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/humvee">Humvee</a> for the U.S. military. Ford is not a partner with the group but did provide a statement this afternoon.<br />
<br />
"We're proud of Ford's 6.7-liter Power Stroke V8 diesel engines and their best-in-class power, durability and fuel economy," said Ford spokesman Mike Levine. "And we are proud the engines were chosen to be part of BAE's JLTV entry."<br />
<br />
Let's just hope that engine is as bulletproof.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>From Super Duty to Call of Duty: Ford could power U.S. military's future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/">From Super Duty to Call of Duty: Ford could power U.S. military's future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20201413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bae systems</category><category>ford</category><category>jltv</category><category>Joint Light Tactical Vehicle</category><category>power stroke</category><category>power stroke 6.7</category><category>power stroke diesel</category><category>super duty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Burgess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20201413/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/20201413/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20201413</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/jltv_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay Find of the Day: 1994 Ford Power Stroke Concept]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/19/ebay-find-of-the-day-1994-ford-power-stroke-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/19/ebay-find-of-the-day-1994-ford-power-stroke-concept/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/19/ebay-find-of-the-day-1994-ford-power-stroke-concept/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/conceptcars/" rel="tag">Concept Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/auction-action/" rel="tag">Auctions</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-power-stroke-conept/"><img alt="Ford Power Stroke Concept" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/18-power-stroke-concept-628.jpg" style="margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 471px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a><br />
<br />
Some <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/concept car">concept cars</a> don't die off into the unknown oblivion of some random unmarked warehouse. Instead, they just fade into <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ebay motors">eBay Motors</a>. The 1994 <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> Power Stroke Concept is the latest refugee from the show circuit that has shown up on everyone's favorite auction site.<br />
<br />
Originally designed to show off the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/power stroke">Ford Power Stroke</a> diesel engine, the bulbous and somewhat homely concept is about as aesthetically far from any full-size truck as it gets. The seller says the vehicle functions as it should and comes with the custom wheels and tires that it rolled onto the stage with way back when. Apparently the show electronics are also included in the deal.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, this machine isn't registered as a street vehicle and likely never will be. As such, the winning bidder will receive a bill of sale. As of the time of writing, the truck has six days left on the auction with zero bids and a $40,000 starting bid. Head over to <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1994-Ford-Power-Stroke-Concept-Truck-Ford-Special-Projects-F350-drive-line-/200663580260?pt=Other_Vehicles_Everything_Else&amp;hash=item2eb87b3e64#ht_785wt_1167">eBay Motors</a> to check out the auction for yourself.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/19/ebay-find-of-the-day-1994-ford-power-stroke-concept/">eBay Find of the Day: 1994 Ford Power Stroke Concept</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/19/ebay-find-of-the-day-1994-ford-power-stroke-concept/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20084619/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/19/ebay-find-of-the-day-1994-ford-power-stroke-concept/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auction</category><category>ebay motors</category><category>ford power stroke</category><category>ford power stroke concept</category><category>power stroke</category><category>power stroke concept</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20084619/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/10/19/ebay-find-of-the-day-1994-ford-power-stroke-concept/20084619/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20084619</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/18-power-stroke-concept-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: Ford 6.7-liter Power Stroke diesel to churn out 800 lb-ft of torque]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/19/report-ford-6-7-liter-power-stroke-diesel-to-churn-out-800-lb-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/19/report-ford-6-7-liter-power-stroke-diesel-to-churn-out-800-lb-f/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/19/report-ford-6-7-liter-power-stroke-diesel-to-churn-out-800-lb-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/07/sources-say-ford-planning-800-pounds-feet-of-torque-for-6-7-power-stroke-diesel.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/fordsuperdutyjob21.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
In February, the specs on <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/ford">Ford's</a> 6.7-liter Power Stroke turbo-diesel V8 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/25/2011-ford-super-duty-power-towing-specs-released/">were announced</a>: 390 horsepower and 735 pound-feet of torque. A month later, <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/general+motors">General Motors</a> laid out the specs on its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/10/gm-quickly-one-ups-ford-with-2011-duramax-diesel-ratings-releas/">6.6-liter Duramax turbo-diesel</a>: 397 hp and 765 lb-ft. According to PickupTrucks.com, the Duramax could be shoved to the corner again later this year, when a high-output Super Duty blows out the footlights with 400 hp and 800 - or more - lb-ft of twisting gumption.<br />
<br />
According to the unknown source within the Blue Oval, Ford's new <a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2009/12/top-7-features-of-fords-6r140-six-speed-heavy-duty-transmission.html">6R140 TorqShift six-speed</a> transmission has strong enough guts that Ford can open up the taps on that engine a bit. And give GM something to think about. If this absurdly powerful dream does come true, the behemoth motor will be seen in the second wave of 2011 Super Duty pickups that begin production in a few months. No word on whether early adopters of the 6.7-liter will get a free upgrade.<br />
<br />
<p>[Source: <a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/07/sources-say-ford-planning-800-pounds-feet-of-torque-for-6-7-power-stroke-diesel.html">PickupTrucks.com</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/19/report-ford-6-7-liter-power-stroke-diesel-to-churn-out-800-lb-f/">Report: Ford 6.7-liter Power Stroke diesel to churn out 800 lb-ft of torque</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/07/sources-say-ford-planning-800-pounds-feet-of-torque-for-6-7-power-stroke-diesel.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/19/report-ford-6-7-liter-power-stroke-diesel-to-churn-out-800-lb-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19559107/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/19/report-ford-6-7-liter-power-stroke-diesel-to-churn-out-800-lb-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>6.6 liter duramax</category><category>6.6LiterDuramax</category><category>6.7 liter ford diesel</category><category>6.7 power stroke</category><category>6.7LiterFordDiesel</category><category>6.7PowerStroke</category><category>duramax</category><category>Ford Super Duty</category><category>FordSuperDuty</category><category>power stroke</category><category>power stroke diesel</category><category>powerstroke</category><category>powerstroke diesel</category><category>PowerstrokeDiesel</category><category>super duty</category><category>SuperDuty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19559107/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/07/19/report-ford-6-7-liter-power-stroke-diesel-to-churn-out-800-lb-f/19559107/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19559107</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/fordsuperdutyjob21_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM challenges Ford to heavy-duty pickup tug of war]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/19/gm-challenges-ford-to-heavy-duty-pickup-tug-of-war/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/19/gm-challenges-ford-to-heavy-duty-pickup-tug-of-war/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/19/gm-challenges-ford-to-heavy-duty-pickup-tug-of-war/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/detroit-auto-show/" rel="tag">Detroit Auto Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/01/truck-of-war-gms-vice-chairman-challenges-ford-to-hd-tug-of-war.html"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/truck-o-war-630op.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Pickuptrucks.com sat down with Tom Stephens, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a>' vice chairman of global product operations at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/detroit-auto-show/">Detroit Auto Show</a>, and during the course of the conversation, Stephens began espousing the virtues of the General's new Duramax diesel, due to be fitted to the 2011 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Chevrolet</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motorsc/">GMC</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/sierra+hd">Heavy Duty</a> pickups. <br />
<br />
Obviously, it's not rare for an exec to speak highly of a new engine, but in a rare moment of brand fervor, Stephens issued a challenge:<br />
<blockquote>
<div><em>"You know what I want to do to prove it? I want to take our truck and </em><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/"><em>Ford</em></a><em>'s [new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/super+duty">Super Duty</a>] and chain them together back-to-back. Then I want to have them pull against each other. I know our truck will beat theirs."</em></div>
</blockquote>After making sure Stephens was serious, the site's intrepid editor, Mike Levine, contacted Ford to see if it was interested in the challenge. He hasn't gotten an official response yet, but he's ready to play referee and set up an event in Texas to pit the two H-D haulers against each other. Consider the gauntlet thrown. Ford? We anxiously await your response...<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/01/truck-of-war-gms-vice-chairman-challenges-ford-to-hd-tug-of-war.html">Pickuptrucks.com</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/19/gm-challenges-ford-to-heavy-duty-pickup-tug-of-war/">GM challenges Ford to heavy-duty pickup tug of war</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/01/truck-of-war-gms-vice-chairman-challenges-ford-to-hd-tug-of-war.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/19/gm-challenges-ford-to-heavy-duty-pickup-tug-of-war/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19322784/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/19/gm-challenges-ford-to-heavy-duty-pickup-tug-of-war/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 chevrolet heavy duty</category><category>2011 ford f350</category><category>2011 ford heavy duty</category><category>2011 gmc heavy duty</category><category>2011ChevroletHeavyDuty</category><category>2011FordF350</category><category>2011FordHeavyDuty</category><category>2011GmcHeavyDuty</category><category>duramax</category><category>power stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19322784/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/01/19/gm-challenges-ford-to-heavy-duty-pickup-tug-of-war/19322784/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19322784</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/truck-o-war-630op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford launching nine engines and six transmissions by the end of 2010]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/detroit-auto-show/" rel="tag">Detroit Auto Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img width="630" vspace="4" hspace="0" height="473" border="1" align="top" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/ecoboostengine02-630.jpg" /><br />
<br />
2010 is shaping up to be an extremely busy year for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford's</a> powertrain engineering and manufacturing teams. By the end of this year, the folks in Dearborn will have launched nine engines and six transmissions that are all-new or substantially redesigned. Several of these combinations have already been revealed over the past month and more will be revealed at tomorrow's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/Detroit-Auto-Show/">Detroit Auto Show</a>. <br />
<br />
On Friday morning, Barb Samardzich, VP of powertrain engineering, ran down the list at a pre-show preview. Three years ago, Ford set about the process of completely revamping its powertrain lineup, and between 2008 and 2013, a total of 60 powertrain combinations will have been introduced globally, with half of those coming by the end of this year. We already knew about the new 1.6-liter inline-four and the six-speed Powershift dual clutch automatic for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fiesta">Fiesta</a>. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/mustang">Mustang</a> is getting new V6 and V8 engines that crank up output significantly while reducing fuel consumption. <br />
<br />
Samardzich confirmed on Friday that the 3.5-liter Ecoboost V6 will land in the F-150 truck later this year. The list presented also includes the previously-announced 2.0-liter inline-four Ecoboost and a new six-speed automatic transmission for transverse applications. <br />
<br />
As we <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-all-but-confirms-four-cylinder-ecoboost-for-next-explorer/">reported earlier today</a>, while no one would get specific about exactly which vehicles these would go into, there were smiles and the usual "not ready to announce anything" when we brought up the new unibody <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/explorer">Explorer</a>. When the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/13/detroit-2008-evolving-the-explorer-ford-explorer-american-con/">Explorer America</a> concept debuted at the 2008 Detroit show, there was discussion of 2.0-liter and 3.5-liter Ecoboost engines, and it appears that's exactly what it will get.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford launching nine engines and six transmissions by the end of 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/">Ford launching nine engines and six transmissions by the end of 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19309295/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010</category><category>2010 ford</category><category>2010 ford powertrain</category><category>2010Ford</category><category>2010FordPowertrain</category><category>Detroit</category><category>detroit 2010</category><category>detroit auto show</category><category>Detroit2010</category><category>DetroitAutoShow</category><category>diesel</category><category>ecoboost</category><category>ecoboost 2.0</category><category>EcoBoost 2.0L</category><category>EcoBoost V6 3.5L Ford</category><category>Ecoboost2.0</category><category>Ecoboost2.0l</category><category>EcoboostEngine</category><category>EcoboostV63.5lFord</category><category>ford</category><category>ford powertrain</category><category>FordPowertrain</category><category>hybrid</category><category>power stroke</category><category>powerstroke</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19309295/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/01/10/ford-launching-nine-engines-and-six-transmissions-by-the-end-of/19309295/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19309295</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/ecoboostengine02-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: Aural evidence new Ford 6.7L Scorpion diesel is quieter]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/vlcsnap-00001.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Click above to view the video <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/">after the jump</a></small></strong></em></div>
<br />
Ford will officially unveil its revised 2011 Super Duty pickups Thursday at the State Fair of Texas, and the all-new, Ford-designed and produced 6.7-liter Power Stroke (aka Scorpion) diesel is the star of the show. We've <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/31/beware-the-scorpion-2011-ford-super-duty-gets-all-new-6-7-liter/">already given you the details on the Scorpion</a>, as well as a description of how quiet it is, and now Ford has now posted a video of one of the diesels on a dynamometer switching from the old single injection pulse control to the new multi-pulse strategy. <br />
<br />
The difference in sound levels is quite startling. By splitting the fuel delivery into multiple pulses (and ignition events) the pressure impulse on the piston is flattened out and spread over a larger time, mitigating the knocking sound. The new engine will be available in production trucks in the second quarter of 2010 and you can check it out for yourself in the video <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/">after the jump</a>.<br />
<br />
[Source: Ford]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIDEO: Aural evidence new Ford 6.7L Scorpion diesel is quieter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/">VIDEO: Aural evidence new Ford 6.7L Scorpion diesel is quieter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19171583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>common rail diesel</category><category>CommonRailDiesel</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesel noise</category><category>DieselNoise</category><category>false</category><category>ford</category><category>power stroke</category><category>power stroke diesel</category><category>power stroke motors</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>PowerStrokeDiesel</category><category>PowerStrokeMotors</category><category>scorpion</category><category>scorpion diesel noise</category><category>scorpion diesel v8</category><category>ScorpionDieselNoise</category><category>ScorpionDieselV8</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19171583/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/09/24/video-aural-evidence-new-ford-6-2l-scorpion-diesel-is-quieter/19171583/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19171583</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/vlcsnap-00001_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Spy Shots: Ford F-150's 4.4L diesel exposed]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/23/spy-shots-ford-f-150s-4-4l-diesel-exposed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/23/spy-shots-ford-f-150s-4-4l-diesel-exposed/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/23/spy-shots-ford-f-150s-4-4l-diesel-exposed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chicago-auto-show/" rel="tag">Chicago Auto Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/spyphotos/" rel="tag">Spy Photos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/news/ford/44diesel/first-spy-shots-underhood-of-f-150-4-4-diesel.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/ford_diesel_spy.jpg" /></a>The Internet got a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/13/new-2010-ford-4-4-liter-diesel-engine-scooped/">sneak peek</a> at the new 4.4L Ford diesel engine last April when somebody snapped a pic of the complete package sitting on the floor at Ford's national dealer conference. Now, thanks to some eagle-eyed sharp shooters, we can see the new oil-burning mill in <a href="http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/news/ford/44diesel/first-spy-shots-underhood-of-f-150-4-4-diesel.html">its natural habitat</a> under the hood of a Ford F-150. Sure, there's lots of black plastic covering all the good stuff, but we can get a glimpse of all the assorted plumbing that will make this engine squeaky clean. We can also have a good shot of the intercooler, peaking out between the grille and the radiator.<br /><br />This engine is labeled as a Power Stroke, Ford's long-running moniker for the diesels equipped in its Super Duty trucks. For years, those mills have been made by Navistar, but after the fallout between the automaker and the supplier, Ford is now using a derivative of the diesel from Land Rover in Europe, though the 4.4L iteration will be made in Mexico for the North American market. Offering 20-percent more fuel economy than the 5.4L gas-powered Triton, along with a considerable bump in power, this could be one very important addition for the Ford Motor Company and will likely make its official debut at next year's Chicago Auto Show.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/news/ford/44diesel/first-spy-shots-underhood-of-f-150-4-4-diesel.html">PickupTrucks.com</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/23/spy-shots-ford-f-150s-4-4l-diesel-exposed/">Spy Shots: Ford F-150's 4.4L diesel exposed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/news/ford/44diesel/first-spy-shots-underhood-of-f-150-4-4-diesel.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/23/spy-shots-ford-f-150s-4-4l-diesel-exposed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1264710/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/23/spy-shots-ford-f-150s-4-4l-diesel-exposed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4.4</category><category>4.4-liter</category><category>4.4l</category><category>4.4l diesel</category><category>4.4L power stroke</category><category>4.4lDiesel</category><category>4.4lPowerStroke</category><category>ford diesel</category><category>ford diesel engine</category><category>ford diesel engines</category><category>ford diesels</category><category>ford power stroke</category><category>FordDiesel</category><category>FordDieselEngine</category><category>FordDieselEngines</category><category>FordDiesels</category><category>FordPowerStroke</category><category>power stroke</category><category>power stroke diesel</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>PowerStrokeDiesel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1264710/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/07/23/spy-shots-ford-f-150s-4-4l-diesel-exposed/1264710/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1264710</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/ford_diesel_spy_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Navistar sues Ford (again) regarding upcoming F-150 diesel engine]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="248" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/fordnavistar2.jpg" />Wow, talk about a strained relationship! With <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/05/ford-super-duty-seeing-super-sales/">so much money</a> passing hands between Ford and Navistar, you might think they would find a way to negotiate a deal regarding their diesel engine partnership(s). You would be right, assuming you think that starting <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070606/REG/706060321/1170">yet another lawsuit</a> is a way to patch things up. That's right... another lawsuit. This one is still about diesel truck engines, but instead of the large 6.4 liter Power Stroke, this one cites a smaller 4.4-liter diesel engine <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/diesel-confirmed-for-light-duty-f-150-by-2009/">slated for the F-150</a> truck in 2009 or 2010. Navistar has been Ford's long-time supplier of diesel engines that carry the "Power Stroke" moniker for Ford, and Navistar is claiming that if Ford goes to market with the 4.4-liter engine, it would constitute a breach of contract. At this point, it seems unclear whether Navistar is claiming to have designed the engine in question, or if it believes it had a contract to do so, but either way, things could get even messier between the two companies.
<p> </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News <span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span>(sub. req'd) via <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/06/07/ford-and-navistar-just-cant-seem-to-play-nice-another-lawsui/">AutoblogGreen</a>]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Navistar sues Ford (again) regarding upcoming F-150 diesel engine</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/">Navistar sues Ford (again) regarding upcoming F-150 diesel engine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070606/REG/706060321/1170>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/912593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>6.4 l</category><category>6.4 liter</category><category>6.4l</category><category>6.4Liter</category><category>diesel</category><category>ford</category><category>international</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>navistar</category><category>power stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>super duty</category><category>SuperDuty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:33:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/912593/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/06/07/navistar-sues-ford-again-regarding-upcoming-f-150-diesel-engin/912593/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>912593</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/fordnavistar2_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: So that's what it looks like! -- Slo-Mo combustion closeup]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><a href="http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2007/04/18/inside-your-engine-combustion-at-10000-fps/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/combustion.jpg" alt="" /></a>We all learn the theory of what happens inside an internal combustion engine; a mixture of fuel and air is ignited by a short electric spark. Some people describe the ensuing event as an explosion, but the ideal is a controlled burn, but it's still so fast that it could be confused for an uncontrolled explosion. An engine is a practical application of thermodynamics, when it comes right down to it. The piston moves by the pressure exerted by the burning fuel mixture, and as the piston moves down the bore, pressure reduces, and work is extracted from the fuel.<br /><br />Of course, there's a lot more to it, but that's the basics. We're sure you had a little animated diagram dancing around in your head the first time you really tried to understand the common Otto cycle. My mental flash player still fires up when I'm trying to figure out different cycles like the Atkinson. Wouldn't it be great to actually <strong>see</strong> inside the cylinder during combustion events? No, we didn't videotape our lawnmower with a <a href="http://gunson.co.uk/item.aspx?item=1822&amp;cat=486">Colortune</a> plug -- this technique is far fancier. <br /><em><br />Video and technique info after the jump<br /><br /></em>[Source: Hemmings]<br /><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIDEO: So that's what it looks like! -- Slo-Mo combustion closeup</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/">VIDEO: So that's what it looks like! -- Slo-Mo combustion closeup</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2007/04/18/inside-your-engine-combustion-at-10000-fps/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/883779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>combustion</category><category>engine</category><category>etc</category><category>ignition</category><category>internal</category><category>photography</category><category>power stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>schlieren</category><category>slow motion</category><category>SlowMotion</category><category>spark plug</category><category>SparkPlug</category><category>tech</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:26:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/883779/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/04/27/video-so-thats-what-it-looks-like-slo-mo-combustion-closeu/883779/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>883779</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/combustion_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford responds to flaming Super Duty video]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/ford-responds-to-flaming-super-duty-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/ford-responds-to-flaming-super-duty-video/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/ford-responds-to-flaming-super-duty-video/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/news/08sdrecall/08sdrecall.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/superdutyflame.jpg" /></a>Our good buddy Mike Levine at Pickuptruck.com did the legwork and got in touch with Ford safety spokesperson Dan Jarvis to talk about the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/">video</a> we showed you yesterday that features a 2008 Ford Super Duty pickup spewing flames from its tailpipes. Jarvis confirmed that the truck in the video is one of the three pickups Ford described last week when it issued a recall to address the problem. While not entirely certain which of the trucks it is, Jarvis said it's one of the two trucks that was purchased in Canada, probably the one that was started in extremely cold temperatures (appx. minus 20 to 30 degrees Fahrenheit) and not given sufficient time to warm up before being driven. That situation could make short work of any engine, and the resultant blown bearing seal in the turbo that leaked combustible fluid into the exhaust system should not necessarily be considered a defective part.<br /><br />Clearly, Ford is very concerned about the reputation of its new 6.4L Power Stroke, which is evident by how quickly it took action with a recall to address three isolated incidents that resulted in the same outcome, i.e. flaming tailpipes. The real issue in each case appears to be this newfangled Diesel Particulate Filter, versions of which are used not only by the Ford Super Duty, but also the Heavy Duty GMT900 and Dodge Ram pickups. Considering that all three heavy duty pickups use a process of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_particulate_filter#Regeneration">regeneration</a> to burn away accumulated particulates in their respective DPFs, the potential for flaming tailpipes exists in all three trucks if an unmetered amount of flammable liquid gets in there somehow. We're certainly not cutting Ford any slack here, but considering it likely sells more heavy duty trucks equipped with diesels than the other two automakers, statistically speaking this was bound to happen to a Ford first. Only time will tell if we're right and other diesel-equipped late-model pickups start getting hot under the collar.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/ford-responds-to-flaming-super-duty-video/">Ford responds to flaming Super Duty video</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/news/08sdrecall/08sdrecall.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/ford-responds-to-flaming-super-duty-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/861849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/ford-responds-to-flaming-super-duty-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesel</category><category>fire</category><category>flames</category><category>Ford Super Duty</category><category>FordSuperDuty</category><category>Power Stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>recall</category><category>tailpipe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:10:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/861849/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/03/28/ford-responds-to-flaming-super-duty-video/861849/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>861849</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/superdutyflame_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: Ford Super Duty diesel throwing flames]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/superdutyflame.jpg" alt="" />This video of a 2008 Ford Super Duty pickup shooting flames from its tailpipes surfaced last week over at <a href="http://www.forddoctorsdts.com/articles/article-07-01.php">forddoctorsdts.com</a>, a forum only open to registered Ford diesel technicians. It made its way to some other forums before finally popping up on more mainstream sites today. Literally nothing is known for sure about the video, like who uploaded it, whether or not the truck spewing flames is one of the three Ford refers to in its recall notice, or even if the light show is the result of leaky injectors or a cracked turbo, the two issues that supposedly prompted the recall of all 2008 Ford Super Dutys equipped with the new 6.4L Power Stroke diesel in the first place.<br /><br />What we do know is that it's pretty shocking to watch a truck throwing flames in idle, even more so when it's revved. We think it's important to be clear about what may be causing this and why Ford issued the recall in the first place. Fortunately, the purveyor of forddoctorsdts.com published a very clear, concise <a href="http://www.forddoctorsdts.com/articles/article-07-01.php">explanation</a> of why the recall was issued and what may be going on in this video.<br /><br />See the <span style="font-weight: bold;">video</span> and continue reading our account of this hot situation after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: YouTube, <a href="http://www.forddoctorsdts.com/articles/article-07-01.php">forddoctorsdts.com</a>, <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070326/SUB/70323044&amp;SearchID=73276243701348">Automotive News</a>, <a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/news/08sdrecall/08sdrecall.html">Pickuptruck.com</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIDEO: Ford Super Duty diesel throwing flames</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/">VIDEO: Ford Super Duty diesel throwing flames</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/news/08sdrecall/08sdrecall.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/861382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 Ford Super Duty</category><category>2008FordSuperDuty</category><category>6.4 Power Stroke</category><category>6.4L Power Stroke</category><category>6.4lPowerStroke</category><category>6.4PowerStroke</category><category>fire</category><category>flame</category><category>flames</category><category>Navistar</category><category>Power Stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>recall</category><category>tailpipe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/861382/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/03/27/video-ford-super-duty-diesel-throwing-flames/861382/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>861382</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/superdutyflame_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Aw, Snap! Ford supplier stops production of Super Duty's Power Stroke diesel engine]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/26/aw-snap-ford-supplier-stops-production-of-super-dutys-power-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/26/aw-snap-ford-supplier-stops-production-of-super-dutys-power-s/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/26/aw-snap-ford-supplier-stops-production-of-super-dutys-power-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/05/ford-prices-2008-super-duty/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/super.jpg" /></a> </p>
<p>If it weren't for bad luck, Ford would have no luck at all. The single largest profit-source for Ford Motor Company would be the F-Series Pickup and the Power Sroke diesel <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/05/ford-prices-2008-super-duty/">Super Duty</a> is a huge chunk of that revenue. Navistar International Engines has powered the Super Duty since 1979, which makes them a large component of Ford's success in the market. The good Karma between Ford and International started to go sour with the quality issues surrounding the 6.0L Power Stroke diesel in the last generation of Super Duty trucks. Relations got worse when Ford recently <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/13/engine-wars-ford-sues-international/">sued International</a>, saying it was not complying with warranty cost-sharing agreements. Ford also contended that International unjustifiably raised prices on its engines. Now International has decided to stop supplying the all-new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/ford-super-duty-6-4l-diesel-tested-to-the-max/">6.4L engine</a> that powers the 2008 Super Duty, claiming that Ford is not honoring the contract terms under which the engines are built. <br /></p>
<p>Navistar has given no indication how long this impasse could last, but every second a Super Duty isn't being assembled by Ford workers is money down the drain. With the cash problems Ford already has, this could get ugly quick. We're guessing Ford doesn't have much choice but to kiss and make up with International in order to keep these too-important Power Stroke Super Duty trucks rolling off the assembly line.</p>
<p>[Source: Yahoo]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/26/aw-snap-ford-supplier-stops-production-of-super-dutys-power-s/">Aw, Snap! Ford supplier stops production of Super Duty's Power Stroke diesel engine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070226/20070226005535.html?.v=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/26/aw-snap-ford-supplier-stops-production-of-super-dutys-power-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/840810/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/26/aw-snap-ford-supplier-stops-production-of-super-dutys-power-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>6.4</category><category>Ford</category><category>International</category><category>Navistar</category><category>power stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>Super Duty</category><category>SuperDuty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/840810/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/02/26/aw-snap-ford-supplier-stops-production-of-super-dutys-power-s/840810/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>840810</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/super_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2008 Ford Super Duty brings more and then some]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/paris-motor-show/" rel="tag">Paris Motor Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/08_superduty.jpg" /><br /><br /><br />The 2008 Ford Super Duty F450 pickup is what an pickup truck is supposed to embody. It's big, real big and with reason. The new uber-truck boasts the highest towing capacity in its class, with the ability to pull 24,000 pounds or haul around 6,000 in payload. It will come equipped with Tow Command, a integrated trailer brake controller, TorqShift, to boost power in high-load conditions, and a few other toys that make loading, unloading and towing less of a chore. As expected a large oil burner provides motivation, with a 6.4-liter Powerstroke Diesel finding its way under the hood.<br /><br />With that much rugged-usefulness, Ford decided to balance the F450 with what they're calling 'tough luxury,' which is exactly what you're thinking it'll be; nice leather, pleasing plastics and lots of toys.<br /><br />The new exterior design, specifically the new headlight placement, may take some getting used to, but we're guessing that whoever buys this beast is going to be less concerned with the styling and more concerned with what's after the jump, namely the full press release and with the hardy details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2008 Ford Super Duty brings more and then some</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/">2008 Ford Super Duty brings more and then some</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/676221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesel</category><category>f450</category><category>ford</category><category>power stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>super duty</category><category>SuperDuty</category><category>towing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:42:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/676221/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/09/28/paris-motor-show-2008-ford-super-duty-brings-more/676221/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>676221</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/08_superduty_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Texas site of 2008 Ford Super Duty and 6.4-liter Power Stroke unveiling]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/misc-auto-shows/" rel="tag">Misc. Auto Shows</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/03_f350_10.jpg" /><br /><br />Once again Texas will play host to a major truck announcement. On Sept. 28th, Ford will unveil its new 2008 F-Series Super Duty pickup and new 6.4-liter Power Stroke diesel at the State Fair of Texas in Dallas. The big news is that the new Power Stroke will be able to run on Ultra Low Sulfur Fuel, the sale of which will be mandated nationwide as of this October. The engine is larger in displacement than the perpetually plagued 6.0-liter unit it replaces and features some high-tech trickery to achieve particulate emissions levels that equal those of gas-powered engines. The most significant is the use of piezo-electric injectors in the common-rail fuel injection system, a first for a pickup engine sold in the U.S. Ford won't reveal the Super Duty's price or the Power Stroke's fuel economy and power figures until closer to the vehicle's launch in Dallas. <br /><br />(Check out Ford's full press release after the jump)<br /><br />[Source: Ford]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Texas site of 2008 Ford Super Duty and 6.4-liter Power Stroke unveiling</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/">Texas site of 2008 Ford Super Duty and 6.4-liter Power Stroke unveiling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/657372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesel</category><category>F-250</category><category>F-350</category><category>piezo</category><category>piezo-electric injectors</category><category>Piezo-electricInjectors</category><category>Power Stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>Super Duty</category><category>SuperDuty</category><category>ultra low sulfur fuel</category><category>UltraLowSulfurFuel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/657372/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/08/22/texas-site-of-2008-ford-super-duty-and-6-4-liter-power-stroke-un/657372/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>657372</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/03_f350_10_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New Ford Powerstroke to use piezo injectors?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/new-ford-powerstroke-said-to-be-using-piezo-injectors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/new-ford-powerstroke-said-to-be-using-piezo-injectors/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/new-ford-powerstroke-said-to-be-using-piezo-injectors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060609/FREE/60605013/1024/LATESTNEWS"><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/super-duty-powerstroke.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>When a new Ford Power Stroke diesel comes along in 2007 to replace the current 6.0-liter model, it may represent the first use of piezo injectors in a pickup truck. The&nbsp;Siemens-built injectors should help International's 6.4-liter&nbsp;twin-turbo meet upcoming emission standards while also improving upon its predecessor's spotty reliability record, as well as giving the Blue Oval oil burner an European-like level of&nbsp;technological sophistication. </p>
<p>The injectors work via the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity">piezoelectric effect</a>, as the name might hint.&nbsp;They use a&nbsp;small disc of quartz-like crystalline material that deforms when subjected to a high-voltage low-current source, which provides the injector opening and closing action. With cycle times as low as 0.2 milliseconds, such injectors are several times faster than conventional solenoids, which in turn&nbsp;is said to allow up to seven&nbsp;injector events during each compression stroke. The precision of each injector is also increased, with injector-to-injector variation of only a few percent. </p>
<p>All of this adds up to a significant improvement in emissions and fuel economy, but at a price; piezo injectors are reportedly up to twice as expensive as the traditional solenoid-based squirters. With the average pickup truck diesel engine carrying a $5,000 premium, we're guessing that there's&nbsp;plenty of room in the budget. </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News/Autoweek]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/new-ford-powerstroke-said-to-be-using-piezo-injectors/">New Ford Powerstroke to use piezo injectors?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060609/FREE/60605013/1024/LATESTNEWS>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/new-ford-powerstroke-said-to-be-using-piezo-injectors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/632495/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/new-ford-powerstroke-said-to-be-using-piezo-injectors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesel</category><category>F-250</category><category>F-350</category><category>F250</category><category>F350</category><category>Ford</category><category>International</category><category>Power Stroke</category><category>Powerstroke</category><category>Super Duty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/632495/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/06/13/new-ford-powerstroke-said-to-be-using-piezo-injectors/632495/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>632495</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/super-duty-powerstroke_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford's Super Duties delayed until calendar 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/fords-super-duties-delayed-until-calendar-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/fords-super-duties-delayed-until-calendar-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/fords-super-duties-delayed-until-calendar-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060526/BUSINESS01/605260346/1014"><img src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/07.ford.sd.f34.500.jpg" align="right" alt="" /></a>Those waiting to do a spot of stump-pulling with Ford's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/spy-shots-2007-ford-super-duty/">revamped 2007 Super Duty</a> pickups will have to hold their horses a little longer. The fortified F-Series trucks won't hit dealers until January, despite internal plans to release it in the fourth quarter of 2006. As a result, the Blue Oval's profit-rich big boys likely won't reach the market ahead of rival General Motors' revamped heavy-duty variants of the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra.</p>
<p>According to the Detroit Free Press, the delay has something to do with quality measures on its new diesels, among other issues.</p>
<p>Regardless of the reason for the holdup, analysts are predicting that the push-back will likely hurt Ford's earnings for 2006.</p>
<p>[Sources: Detroit Free Press; Inside Line]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/fords-super-duties-delayed-until-calendar-2007/">Ford's Super Duties delayed until calendar 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 May 2006 13:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060526/BUSINESS01/605260346/1014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/fords-super-duties-delayed-until-calendar-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/622687/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/fords-super-duties-delayed-until-calendar-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Diesel</category><category>F-250</category><category>F-350</category><category>F-Series</category><category>GMC Sierra</category><category>GmcSierra</category><category>Power Stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><category>SD</category><category>Silverado</category><category>Super Duty</category><category>SuperDuty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 13:04:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/622687/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/05/29/fords-super-duties-delayed-until-calendar-2007/622687/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>622687</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/07.ford.sd.f34.500_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford dresses up the Super Duty Lariat with Outlaw and Highline packages]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/Super-Duty-Lariat-Outlaw-Highline-(resized-450).JPG" /></p>
<p>Not content to let the newly-redesigned Super Duty rest with <em>only</em> five trim levels, Ford has announced two more for the late May&nbsp;start of 2007 production&nbsp;- the Lariat Outlaw and Lariat Highline.</p>
<p>Available only with the Powerstroke 6.0L diesel, the black monochrome Outlaw is designed to attract the sort of disobedient bad-asses who buy $50,000 trucks. Leather-covered captain's chairs keep prospective Young Guns comfortable, and there are a set of chrome&nbsp;step bars in case they've got trouble making a big single leap into the cab. Tinted windows are included to hide all those&nbsp;law-breaking activities from the authorities. </p>
<p>The Highline, available with all three options, adds to the already long list of standard Lariat equipment by adding an all-black leather interior, brushed aluminum trim, and a billet grille that is larger than most garage doors. </p>
<p>Ford's full press release is posted after the jump. </p>
<p>[Source: Ford Motor Company]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford dresses up the Super Duty Lariat with Outlaw and Highline packages</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/">Ford dresses up the Super Duty Lariat with Outlaw and Highline packages</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 08 May 2006 11:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/615786/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dually</category><category>F-150</category><category>F-250</category><category>F-350</category><category>Ford</category><category>Highline</category><category>Outlaw</category><category>Power Stroke</category><category>Super Duty</category><category>Triton</category><category>V10</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 11:56:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/615786/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/05/08/ford-dresses-up-the-super-duty-lariat-with-outlaw-and-highline-p/615786/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>615786</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/Super-Duty-Lariat-Outlaw-Highline-(resized-450)_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford tries to win back Power Stroke customers with cash]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/22/ford-tries-to-win-back-power-stroke-customers-with-cash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/22/ford-tries-to-win-back-power-stroke-customers-with-cash/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/22/ford-tries-to-win-back-power-stroke-customers-with-cash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060320/SUB/60317109/1078&amp;refsect"><img alt=""hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/Ford-Super-Duty-(resized-250).JPG" align="right" vspace="4"border="0" /></a>To say that Ford's introduction of its revised Power Stroke diesel engine in 2003 didn't go well wouldbe an understatement. Buyers of such engines demand reliability, and the new 6.0L&nbsp;had some rather significant fuelsystem and induction problems, leading to a large number of service bulletins and even some buy-backs of defectivevehicles. The problem has been made worse by the importance of this market to Ford, as it is currently the leader indiesel pickup sales.</p>
<p>In order to convince customers to come back to the Blue Oval instead of straying across the street to the land ofDuramax and Cummins, the company is offering a $2,500 "loyalty bonus" to prospective shoppers who own 2003and 2004 Super Duty pickups equipped with the Power Stroke. The company is backing this with a promotional push by itsdealer network, and it's likely that most dealers don't need to be reminded why they should want to retain their buyersof $40K (and up) trucks. We believe that buyers ultimately must be convinced that the engine's problems have beenaddressed-- and that assurance isn't likely to come from incentives, especially not in a sale environment alreadypolluted with cash-back offers of all varieties. It's our guess that word-of-mouth and the level of&nbsp;attention (andsatisfaction)&nbsp;paid to previous problems will determine whether customers come back to Ford, or find theiroil-burning fix elsewhere. </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/22/ford-tries-to-win-back-power-stroke-customers-with-cash/">Ford tries to win back Power Stroke customers with cash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060320/SUB/60317109/1078&amp;refsect>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/22/ford-tries-to-win-back-power-stroke-customers-with-cash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/601587/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/22/ford-tries-to-win-back-power-stroke-customers-with-cash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blue Oval</category><category>BlueOval</category><category>Cummins</category><category>diesel</category><category>Duramax</category><category>F-Series</category><category>Ford</category><category>Heavy Duty</category><category>HeavyDuty</category><category>Power Stroke</category><category>PowerStroke</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:45:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/601587/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/03/22/ford-tries-to-win-back-power-stroke-customers-with-cash/601587/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>601587</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/Ford-Super-Duty-(resized-250)_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>