<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai plant one of 100 factories shutting down in wake of Beijing pollution scare]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/21/hyundai-plant-one-of-100-factories-shutting-down-in-wake-of-beij/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/21/hyundai-plant-one-of-100-factories-shutting-down-in-wake-of-beij/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/21/hyundai-plant-one-of-100-factories-shutting-down-in-wake-of-beij/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1128158/beijing-chemical-plants-and-factories-shut-try-curb-air-pollution"><img alt="Smog in Beijing" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/beijing-smog-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 449px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Many factories and chemical plants have suspended production in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/beijing/">Beijing</a> in an attempt to curb dangerous <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/pollution/">pollution</a>, according to the <em>South China Morning Post</em>. The air pollution is some of the worst the city has seen in years, with harmful PM2.5 particle rates hovering between 200 and 400 micrograms per cubic meter. That number is down from as high as 886 on Sunday. For contrast, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/environmental protection agency/">US Environmental Protection Agency</a> regulations say PM2.5 concentration at any location be no higher than 65 micrograms per cubic meter, with average maximums not to exceed 15 micrograms per cubic meter.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/china/">China</a> blames the pollution on vehicle emissions, industrial production and an increase in domestic coal use to heat homes during cold weather. A total of 48 work sites, including construction zones, metal refineries and chemical plants have suspended production, and 41 factories have cut back production as well. That includes <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> Motor Beijing, which suspended production on Sunday.<br />
<br />
Even so, the area's children's hospitals are receiving up to 10,000 patients per day with respiratory ailments. The city's government says it is in the midst of an eight-year plan to curb pollution and that levels have dropped between 30 and 70 percent over the past 14 years thanks to its actions.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/21/hyundai-plant-one-of-100-factories-shutting-down-in-wake-of-beij/">Hyundai plant one of 100 factories shutting down in wake of Beijing pollution scare</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/21/hyundai-plant-one-of-100-factories-shutting-down-in-wake-of-beij/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20432801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/21/hyundai-plant-one-of-100-factories-shutting-down-in-wake-of-beij/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beijing</category><category>beijing pollution</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai motor beijing</category><category>pollution</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20432801/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/21/hyundai-plant-one-of-100-factories-shutting-down-in-wake-of-beij/20432801/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20432801</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/beijing-smog-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Artists create amazing "reverse graffiti" car art using pollution and a power washer]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/design-style/" rel="tag">Design/Style</a></p><a href="/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/#continued"><img alt="" artists="" create="" reverse="" roadster="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/09/reverse-graffiti-tesla.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 355px; " tesla="" /></a><br />
<br />
Marc Cameron and Paul "Moose" Curtis, are an artistic twosome that are exceedingly skilled at turning dirt, grime and muck into art. In fact, the pair have teamed up to create our favorite kind of art - the sort that features automobiles as the subject. Starting with a spot on a dirt-covered wall in Munich, Moose and Cameron remove the buildup of gunk in various layers leaving behind their desired image.<br />
<br />
It's called "reverse graffiti" or "grime writing," and rather than covering a wall in paint, Cameron and Moose actually <em>clean</em> a portion of the area they're working on. Some stencils, a few helping hands and a high-pressure power washer are the tools at work, and the resulting image not only illustrates how polluted public surfaces can be, it's also wonderful spin on a form of art that's typically frowned up.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2011/09/19/marc-cameron-and-paul-curtis-create-reverse-graffiti-cars-from/#continued">Click past the jump</a> to watch a reverse graffiti <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tesla/roadster/">Tesla Roadster</a> come to life, a project Cameron and Curtis coordinated with German's <a href="http://sz-magazin.sueddeutsche.de/"><em>SZ-Magazin</em></a>. Also, click through the gallery to get a closer look at some more of Marc and Paul's work, including the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/01/paris-2010-renault-twizy-charges-the-stage/">Renault Twizy</a>. If you are interested in learning more about Marc's unique work, feel free to email him - Cameron @ Cameron2210.com or check out his website using the link below.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Artists create amazing "reverse graffiti" car art using pollution and a power washer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/">Artists create amazing "reverse graffiti" car art using pollution and a power washer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20046648/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>eco art</category><category>graffiti</category><category>green art</category><category>grime writing</category><category>marc cameron</category><category>moose</category><category>paul curtis</category><category>pollution</category><category>pollution art</category><category>renault twizy</category><category>reverse graffiti</category><category>roadster</category><category>tesla roadster</category><category>twizy</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20046648/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/09/19/artists-create-amazing-reverse-graffiti-car-art-using-pollutio/20046648/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20046648</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/09/reverse-graffiti-tesla_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: EPA draws up strict new smog regulations]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/07/report-epa-draws-up-strict-new-smog-regulations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/07/report-epa-draws-up-strict-new-smog-regulations/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/07/report-epa-draws-up-strict-new-smog-regulations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/science/earth/08smog.html"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/85041076-630op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
The Environmental Protection Agency has asked the U.S. government to enact strict new smog regulations for ground-level ozone that the agency says negatively effects the health of millions of Americans. The request to cut ground-level ozone levels to .006 to .007 parts per million comes less than two years after the Bush administration set standards of .0075 particles of pollutants per one million.</p>
<p>That doesn't sound like a very big change, but the <em>New York Times</em> reports that the agency quotes the price tag of such a change at between $19 billion and $100 billion per year by 2020. Oil manufacturers, manufacturing and utility companies are the main source of air pollution and they will have to spend heavily to meet the proposed regulation.</p>
<p>Much of the costs associated with making powerplants and manufacturing facilities cleaner will fall directly on the shoulders of consumers, though a great deal of that money could possibly be recouped by cheaper health care. The EPA estimates that we would save between $13 billion and $100 billion per year in health care costs if our air were cleaner. Even more important are the estimated 12,000 lives that will be spared each year from heart and lung disease if big industry emits fewer pollutants.</p>
<p>Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson underscored the negative impact of smog to our health, adding that ground-level ozone "dirties our air, clouds our cities and drives up our health care costs across the country." National Association of Clean Air Agencies executive director S. William Becker adds that local governments have been asking for tougher standards "for 30 years," and that cleaner air "will ensure that public health is protected with an adequate margin of safety."</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, the oil lobby isn't all that happy with the EPA's request. The American Petroleum Institute calls the proposal costly and likely ineffective, classifying it as an "obvious politicization of the air quality standard setting process that could mean unnecessary energy cost increases, job losses and less domestic oil and natural gas development and energy security."<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/science/earth/08smog.html">New York Times</a> | Image: Ethan Miller/Getty]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/07/report-epa-draws-up-strict-new-smog-regulations/">Report: EPA draws up strict new smog regulations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/science/earth/08smog.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/07/report-epa-draws-up-strict-new-smog-regulations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19307728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/07/report-epa-draws-up-strict-new-smog-regulations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>environmental protection agency</category><category>EnvironmentalProtectionAgency</category><category>epa</category><category>ground-level ozone</category><category>Ground-levelOzone</category><category>pollution</category><category>smog</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:33:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19307728/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/01/07/report-epa-draws-up-strict-new-smog-regulations/19307728/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19307728</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/85041076-630op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: GM gets out from under its polluted sites scot-free]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/07/report-gm-gets-out-from-under-its-polluted-sites-scot-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/07/report-gm-gets-out-from-under-its-polluted-sites-scot-free/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/07/report-gm-gets-out-from-under-its-polluted-sites-scot-free/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090807/BUSINESS01/908070382/GM-gets-to-walk-away-from-its-polluted-sites"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/buick_city.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Among those clamoring for attention and payouts from Motors Liquidation Co., the company that assumed General Motors' unwanted assets after its Chapter 11 filing, are the environmental and economic redevelopment departments of state governments. According to reports, when GM exited bankruptcy, its polluted factory and land sites were consumed by the Motor Liquidation, allowing the automaker to avoid the responsibility of cleaning up its mess, and state leaders fear there won't be any money to clean the locations.<br />
<br />
Before bankruptcy, GM estimated it had $1.9 billion in environmental issues and litigation liabilites. Motors Liquidation Co., though, has only about $1.2 billion to manage the entire wind-down of its affairs -- and as one might expect, attorneys handling the matter are expected to get a huge chunk of that. The figure to clean up sites in places like Buick City (pictured, before the buildings were demolished), Michigan and Massena, New York has been pegged at $530 million. However, the way it's looking, there won't be anywhere near that much money to get the job done.<br />
<br />
The affected areas are afraid they will have to pay for the clean ups or simply let the land go unused. The problem with that: those local governments don't have the money. And they can't expect a developer to spend millions to clean up an old mess. If not Motors Liquidation or GM, civic representatives want the government to foot the bill since the current administration orchestrated the deal. No one knows how it will -- or won't -- be resolved, but the EPA has said that it's in touch with states and Motors Liquidation to "identify any environmental cleanup requirements that existed at the time of bankruptcy."<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090807/BUSINESS01/908070382/GM-gets-to-walk-away-from-its-polluted-sites">Freep</a> | Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.plan59.com/photos/buickcity.htm">Plan59</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/07/report-gm-gets-out-from-under-its-polluted-sites-scot-free/">REPORT: GM gets out from under its polluted sites scot-free</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/article/20090807/BUSINESS01/908070382/GM-gets-to-walk-away-from-its-polluted-sites>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/07/report-gm-gets-out-from-under-its-polluted-sites-scot-free/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19122471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/07/report-gm-gets-out-from-under-its-polluted-sites-scot-free/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>environment</category><category>environmental</category><category>factories</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>gm bankruptcy</category><category>GmBankruptcy</category><category>government</category><category>legal</category><category>michigan</category><category>motors liquidation co</category><category>MotorsLiquidationCo</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>plants</category><category>pollution</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19122471/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/08/07/report-gm-gets-out-from-under-its-polluted-sites-scot-free/19122471/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19122471</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/buick_city_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Riders on the Storm: Does car exhaust contribute to lightning strikes?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/riders-on-the-storm-does-car-exhaust-contribute-to-lightning-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/riders-on-the-storm-does-car-exhaust-contribute-to-lightning-st/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/riders-on-the-storm-does-car-exhaust-contribute-to-lightning-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126915.300-car-exhaust-fumes-cause-lightning-strikes.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/2441647009_0fbb799edb_o_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />You can add another life-killing phenomenon to the list of deadly byproducts attributable to cars: increased lightning strikes. Researchers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem found that in the southeastern U.S. from 1998-2008, there was 25% more lightning during the work week than on the weekend.<br /><br />This follows from research by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center that found <a href="http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2008/04/18/rainy-days-and-weekdays/">rainfall in that same area</a> of the country rose during the week. The suspected culprit is automobile pollution, which is causing more storms during the week and increasing the severity of storms. That pollution, and the humid air in the southeast, makes for more clouds to rise and create more conditions for lightning strikes. It's just another step closer to the apocalypse, and we don't doubt that they'll soon be telling us cars cause cancer. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/automobiles/27EMF.html?_r=2&amp;ref=automobiles&amp;oref=slogin">Oh, wait</a>... <em>Thanks for the tip, Corey!</em><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126915.300-car-exhaust-fumes-cause-lightning-strikes.html">Scientific American</a> via <a href="http://thecollegedriver.com/posts/288-Car-Exhaust-Causes-Lightning-Strikes">The College Driver</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/riders-on-the-storm-does-car-exhaust-contribute-to-lightning-st/">Riders on the Storm: Does car exhaust contribute to lightning strikes?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126915.300-car-exhaust-fumes-cause-lightning-strikes.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/riders-on-the-storm-does-car-exhaust-contribute-to-lightning-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1433766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/riders-on-the-storm-does-car-exhaust-contribute-to-lightning-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>environment</category><category>etc</category><category>lightning</category><category>pollution</category><category>research</category><category>science</category><category>storm</category><category>tech</category><category>weather</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1433766/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/01/20/riders-on-the-storm-does-car-exhaust-contribute-to-lightning-st/1433766/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1433766</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/2441647009_0fbb799edb_o_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[No car repairs or painting in Beijing until after Olympics]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/no-car-repairs-or-painting-in-beijing-until-after-olympics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/no-car-repairs-or-painting-in-beijing-until-after-olympics/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/no-car-repairs-or-painting-in-beijing-until-after-olympics/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/200px-beijing_2008.svg.png" />The city of Beijing has drawn widely-publicized <a href="http://travel.latimes.com/articles/la-trw-olympics13mar13">controversy</a> due to its <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120577799162242425.html">poor air-quality</a> leading up to the 2008 Summer Olympic games. In fact, the air pollution is at least <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6950883.stm">two to three times higher</a> than levels deemed safe by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Organization" title="World Health Organization">World Health Organization</a> at this very moment. To ease the minds of the competing athletes, the city of Beijing is taking steps to improve the situation and has <a href="http://en.beijing2008.cn/29/47/article214024729.shtml">promised clean air</a> for the games. Officials in Beijing have already cut the number of vehicles driving in the city in half by alternating what vehicles are allowed to drive each day and have asked more people to <a href="http://en.beijing2008.cn/71/80/article214088071.shtml">ride bikes</a>. Now, they've <a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/odds-and-ends/beijing-bans-car-painting-and-repairs-ahead-of-olympics/">banned</a> car repairs and spray painting until after the games are over. We are all for the athletes rights to breathe clean air, but we also have to wonder about the economic cost associated with cutting out all automotive repairs and painting.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/odds-and-ends/beijing-bans-car-painting-and-repairs-ahead-of-olympics/">Motor Authority</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/no-car-repairs-or-painting-in-beijing-until-after-olympics/">No car repairs or painting in Beijing until after Olympics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/news/odds-and-ends/beijing-bans-car-painting-and-repairs-ahead-of-olympics/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/no-car-repairs-or-painting-in-beijing-until-after-olympics/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1169674/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/no-car-repairs-or-painting-in-beijing-until-after-olympics/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beijing</category><category>beijing 2008</category><category>beijing air</category><category>beijing olympics</category><category>beijing-2008</category><category>beijing-air</category><category>beijing-olympics</category><category>beijing-pollution</category><category>beijing2008</category><category>BeijingAir</category><category>BeijingOlympics</category><category>olympic</category><category>olympic games</category><category>olympic-games</category><category>OlympicGames</category><category>olympics</category><category>pollution</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:35:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1169674/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/04/17/no-car-repairs-or-painting-in-beijing-until-after-olympics/1169674/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1169674</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/200px-beijing_2008.svg_thumbnail.png</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford exec: Drive greener or else!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/ford-exec-drive-greener-or-else/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/ford-exec-drive-greener-or-else/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/ford-exec-drive-greener-or-else/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.whatcar.com/news-article.aspx?NA=222863"><img width="449" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="206" border="0" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/greenfordlogo.jpg" /></a><br /><br />In an interview with Whatcar?, Ford's global product development boss <a href="http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=195">Richard Parry-Jones </a>said car buyers need to embrace greener cars if global warming is to be overcome. In fact, Parry-Jones goes on to say it's the role of the consumer, not car manufacturers, to save the planet from polluting automobiles. Government incentives for eco-conscious car shoppers, not punishment of manufacturers, is the way to go, he said.<br /><br />This environmentalist push is brought to you by a company producing at least 40 Ford-branded models rated at less than <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx2005f.jsp?hiddenField=Manufacturer&amp;year=2007&amp;make=Ford">20 mpg city by the EPA</a>. Only eight 2007 Fords get more than 30 mpg on the highway. Though to Ford's credit, Parry-Jones says 66% of his company's future R&amp;D budget is devoted to increasing fuel-economy and reducing emissions. We've reported in the <a href="http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=195">past</a>, however, that not all agree with Ford's green push.<br /><br />[Source: Whatcar?]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/ford-exec-drive-greener-or-else/">Ford exec: Drive greener or else!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.whatcar.com/news-article.aspx?NA=222863>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/ford-exec-drive-greener-or-else/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/692920/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/ford-exec-drive-greener-or-else/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative fuels</category><category>AlternativeFuels</category><category>car emissions</category><category>CarEmissions</category><category>emissions</category><category>environment</category><category>environmental</category><category>fomoco</category><category>ford</category><category>ford motor company</category><category>FordMotorCompany</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>green</category><category>pollution</category><category>richard parry-jones</category><category>RichardParry-jones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:09:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/692920/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/10/30/ford-exec-drive-greener-or-else/692920/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>692920</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/greenfordlogo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[German government calls out the PT Cruiser for tailpipe emissions]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/10/german-government-calls-out-the-pt-cruiser-for-tailpipe-emission/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/10/german-government-calls-out-the-pt-cruiser-for-tailpipe-emission/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/10/german-government-calls-out-the-pt-cruiser-for-tailpipe-emission/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a></p><p><a href="http://today.reuters.com/business/newsArticle.aspx?type=ousiv&amp;storyID=2006-05-08T152635Z_01_L08716846_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPRO-AUTOS-DAIMLERCHRYSLER-CRUISER-DC.XML"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/PT-Cruiser-(resized-250).JPG" alt="" /></a>DaimlerChrysler is on the receiving end of some flack from Germany's own Federal Emissions Agency, which is accusing the automaker of inadequate pollution controls on the European-market Chrysler PT Cruiser. </p>
<p>The debate centers&nbsp;on the function of the PT's catalytic converter at high rates of speed. According to the agency, heavy acceleration above 72 MPH (and <em>any </em>acceleration in a PT at that speed probably&nbsp;counts as "heavy") results in excessive carbon monoxide emissions. A spokesperson for Chrysler claimed that such a scenario was not part of the emissions certification process, but the environmental agency rejects this claim and states that the pollution limits apply to any part of the drive cycle. It would seem that the agency is ignoring the fundamentals of engine management; heavy acceleration calls for fuel enrichment to avoid engine damage, and that will cause CO emissions given a sufficiently long application of wide-open throttle. </p>
<p>[Source: Reuters]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/10/german-government-calls-out-the-pt-cruiser-for-tailpipe-emission/">German government calls out the PT Cruiser for tailpipe emissions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 10 May 2006 15:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/business/newsArticle.aspx?type=ousiv&amp;storyID=2006-05-08T152635Z_01_L08716846_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPRO-AUTOS-DAIMLERCHRYSLER-CRUISER-DC.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/10/german-government-calls-out-the-pt-cruiser-for-tailpipe-emission/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/616819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/10/german-government-calls-out-the-pt-cruiser-for-tailpipe-emission/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>Daimler</category><category>emissions</category><category>Germany</category><category>pollution</category><category>PT Cruiser</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:38:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/616819/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/05/10/german-government-calls-out-the-pt-cruiser-for-tailpipe-emission/616819/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>616819</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/PT-Cruiser-(resized-250)_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Biodiesel plant caught polluting]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/biodiesel-plant-caught-polluting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/biodiesel-plant-caught-polluting/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/biodiesel-plant-caught-polluting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002938965_biodiesel19m.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4"border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/biodiesel-plant.jpg" /></a>The <em>SeattleTimes</em> reports that the Washington State Department of Ecology has sent a warning to a biodiesel-crushing plant inthe state that it is releasing methanol, a toxic vapor, without a permit. Further investigation has shown spilledvegetable and biodiesel oil on the premise, as well. The landlord has ordered a halt on all biodiesel production.<br/><br />The investigation comes at a bad time for biodiesel supporters. Plans such as building ten biodiesel plants inother parts of the state are threatened as the State Department and biodiesel companies such as Air-Energy, which hadinvested in such plants, clash over issues from lack of permits to proper waste management.<br /><br />[Source: SeattleTimes]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/biodiesel-plant-caught-polluting/">Biodiesel plant caught polluting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002938965_biodiesel19m.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/biodiesel-plant-caught-polluting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/610539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/biodiesel-plant-caught-polluting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biodiesel</category><category>diesel</category><category>emissions</category><category>environment</category><category>methanol</category><category>plant</category><category>pollutant</category><category>polluter</category><category>polluting</category><category>pollution</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:23:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/610539/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/04/21/biodiesel-plant-caught-polluting/610539/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>610539</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/biodiesel-plant_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox News commentator: Ford's 'Green strategy' a mistake]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/27/fox-news-commentatory-fords-green-strategy-a-mistake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/27/fox-news-commentatory-fords-green-strategy-a-mistake/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/27/fox-news-commentatory-fords-green-strategy-a-mistake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188962,00.html"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/tellbillford.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>On <em>FoxNews</em>, Steven Milloy writes about the backlash suffered by Ford CEO Bill Ford, Jr. at the hands of variousenvironmental groups. The organisations have expressed their&nbsp;displeasure&nbsp;by pointing out that the Blue Ovalstill produces too much pollution from its manufacturing ("more heat-trapping pollution into our skies each yearthan the entire country of Mexico"); continues to produce gas-guzzling SUVs; and argues that&nbsp;theautomaker&nbsp;opposes proposed California legislation requiring reduction of carbon dioxide&nbsp;emissions by 2016.The ridicule climaxes adjacent to the pictured ad in the New York Times.<br /><br />However, Milloy takes issue withthe criticism, pointing to what he considers the fallacies of the groups' talking points. But he reserves the bulkof&nbsp;his ire for Ford himself, who he believes is too&nbsp;'occupied' trying to appeal to the environmental groups,even when such overtures threaten the company's bottom line. For example, Milloy points out that according to theAlliance of Automobile Manufacturers, complying with the California law may reduce CO emissions by a 'minuscule' amountwhile raising vehicle costs by thousands of dollars.<br /><br />Specific details can be found at the link. When you comeback, fire off in Comments. <br /><br />[Source: Fox News.com]<br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/27/fox-news-commentatory-fords-green-strategy-a-mistake/">Fox News commentator: Ford's 'Green strategy' a mistake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188962,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/27/fox-news-commentatory-fords-green-strategy-a-mistake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/602858/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/27/fox-news-commentatory-fords-green-strategy-a-mistake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carbon dioxide</category><category>cars</category><category>environment</category><category>greenhouse effect</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>Opinion</category><category>pollution</category><category>suvs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:24:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/602858/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/03/27/fox-news-commentatory-fords-green-strategy-a-mistake/602858/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>602858</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/tellbillford_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[London questions hybrid's environmental friendliness]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/20/london-questions-hybrids-environmental-friendliness/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/20/london-questions-hybrids-environmental-friendliness/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/20/london-questions-hybrids-environmental-friendliness/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.channel4.com/4car/news/news-story.jsp?news_id=14221"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1"align="right" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/lexus-rx400h-badge.jpg" /></a>U.K. Channel 4 reportsthat Ken Livingston, the mayor of London, England, is questioning the exemption status of the Lexus RX400h SUV. Ownersof the hybrid do not pay the normal eight pound ($14 USD) daily "congestion charge" levied on London driversby the city. <br /><br />The reason for this reexamination? The RX400h uses more fuel and releases more carbon dioxidein its non-electric mode than many non-hybrid vehicles according to the article. Also, Jenny Jones, an adviser toLivingstone, states, "...Its size means it causes more congestion and it also poses a danger to pedestriansand cyclists because of the high, unforgiving bonnet."<br /><br />[Source: The Times via Channel 4]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/20/london-questions-hybrids-environmental-friendliness/">London questions hybrid's environmental friendliness</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.channel4.com/4car/news/news-story.jsp?news_id=14221>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/20/london-questions-hybrids-environmental-friendliness/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/600922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/20/london-questions-hybrids-environmental-friendliness/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>England</category><category>green</category><category>hybrid</category><category>Lexus</category><category>London</category><category>pollution</category><category>RX400h</category><category>SUV</category><category>UK</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/600922/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/03/20/london-questions-hybrids-environmental-friendliness/600922/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>600922</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/lexus-rx400h-badge_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Government emissions study a blow to automakers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/18/government-emissions-study-a-blow-to-automakers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/18/government-emissions-study-a-blow-to-automakers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/18/government-emissions-study-a-blow-to-automakers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040925/news_1n25smog.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1"align="right" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/califemissions.jpg" /></a>The U.S. National ResearchCouncil released its much-anticipated study of emissions standards Thursday, and its recommendations are a majordisappointment to automakers. The NRC study backed the rights of individual states to set their own tough vehiclepollution standards independently of the federal Environmental Protection Agency, following the lead of California.<br/><br />California implemented pollution regulation before the federal government, and has been granted the authorityto continue setting its own standards. Other states can choose between federal standards and California's tougherrules.<br /><br />The NRC found California's approach to be both scientifically valid, and necessary because ofpersistent pollution problems in some parts of the state. California in 2004 approved the world's most stringent rulesto reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and automakers have been lobbying hard to restrict their adoption by other states.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/18/government-emissions-study-a-blow-to-automakers/">Government emissions study a blow to automakers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11857144/from/RSS/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/18/government-emissions-study-a-blow-to-automakers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/600397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/18/government-emissions-study-a-blow-to-automakers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>emissions</category><category>EPA</category><category>national research council</category><category>NationalResearchCouncil</category><category>pollution</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/600397/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/03/18/government-emissions-study-a-blow-to-automakers/600397/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>600397</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/califemissions_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>