<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[AdSpotting Super Bowl Edition: Grading the Ads]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a></p><a href="/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/#continued"><img height="393" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/nflsuperbowlspansb583.62e4978ac1204d73bddc9bcb67460ab9-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Just like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/super bowl/">Super Bowl XLVI</a> had to have a winner and a loser, so do the commercials. We've assembled every car commercial that aired during the big game <a href="/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/#continued">after the jump</a>, along with a poll allowing you to vote on your favorite.<br />
<br />
To help you decide, we've graded the ads based on the opinions of our own AOL Autos Editor-in-Chief David Kiley. Having been marketing editor at <em>BusinessWeek</em>, an Adweek and Advertising Age columnist and reporter, and an ad executive at three agencies that worked on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/">Mazda</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> accounts, Kiley's judgment counts more than most in this sort of discussion.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/#continued">Follow the jump</a> to review our report card and vote for your favorite Super Bowl car commercial in our poll. The automakers are listening, so use your vote to tell them the ad you liked most, and just maybe you'll see more like it next year.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AdSpotting Super Bowl Edition: Grading the Ads</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/">AdSpotting Super Bowl Edition: Grading the Ads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20159830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adspotting</category><category>featured</category><category>poll</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl ads</category><category>super bowl commercials</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20159830/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/02/06/adspotting-super-bowl-edition-grading-the-ads/20159830/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20159830</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/nflsuperbowlspansb583.62e4978ac1204d73bddc9bcb67460ab9-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Jeremy Clarkson voted worst off-road trip partner in UK survey]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uk/" rel="tag">UK</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/off-road/" rel="tag">Off-Road</a></p><a href="/2012/02/01/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/#continued"><img height="433" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/clarkson1.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
If you're about to embark on an off-road driving expedition, you're going to need the right co-pilot. Someone with good knowledge of how a car works, good survival skills and - most important of all - a good sense of humor.<br />
<br />
This according to a recent study carried out in the UK by Continental Tires ahead of the launch of the Conti 4x4 Trophy, in which respondents ranked humor as an over-arching qualifying trait for the right person to ride shotgun.<br />
<br />
So who did the British respondents choose? The blokes went with a pretty face in glamor model Kelly Brook, while the ladies elected Robert Pattinson of <em>Twilight</em> fame. But it's the least favorite picks that caught our attention.<br />
<br />
According to the study, the worst person to have riding shotgun on such an off-road trip would be <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jeremy+clarkson">Jeremy Clarkson</a>. Joining Jezza in the top ten least favorite co-pilots in the study were Katie Price (another "glamor model" like the aforementioned Kelly Brook who goes by the name Jordan), Prime Minister David Cameron, fashion model Kate Moss, TV show hostesses Carol Vorderman and Christine Bleakley, parliamentarian Nick Clegg, pop idol Madonna, <em>Idol</em> host Simon Cowell and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/f1">F1</a> driver <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/hamilton">Lewis Hamilton</a>.<br />
<br />
For our part, we're not sure the <em>Top Gear</em> host (or for that matter the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/mclaren">McLaren</a> driver) would be at the very top of our list, but he certainly wouldn't be at the bottom. This after a similar study placed Jezza as the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/jeremy-clarkson-voted-top-uk-housesitter/">top choice for a house-sitter</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/04/no-5-celebrity-that-uk-men-most-want-to-have-a-date-with-the/">one of the top five</a> Brits that men would like to have a date with, and, most contradictingly, the country's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2005/12/12/jeremy-clarkson-more-popular-than-angelina-jolie-in-uk/">top pick</a> for a passenger on an on-road trip.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jeremy Clarkson voted worst off-road trip partner in UK survey</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/">Jeremy Clarkson voted worst off-road trip partner in UK survey</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20162165/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>britain</category><category>clarkson</category><category>conti 4x4 trophy</category><category>continental</category><category>jeremy clarkson</category><category>poll</category><category>study</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20162165/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/02/02/jeremy-clarkson-voted-worst-off-road-trip-partner-in-uk-survey/20162165/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20162165</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/clarkson1_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Survey says U.S. drivers want red light cameras]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/07/survey-says-u-s-drivers-want-red-light-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/07/survey-says-u-s-drivers-want-red-light-cameras/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/07/survey-says-u-s-drivers-want-red-light-cameras/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr063011.html"><img alt="red light photo" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/red-light-photo.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px; float: right;" /></a>Having written a number of pieces on <a href="http://autoblog.search.aol.com/search?q=red+light+cameras&amp;s_it=header_form">red light cameras</a>, we have come across surveys that showed a group of people being in favor of the intersection sentinels, but we have never come across a survey in which a majority of people in a particular city actually lobbied for the automated ticket generators. A poll taken by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety changes that. In a survey of people in 14 cities that have had "long-standing" red-light cameras, it found that a majority of people in all but one city were in favor of them. Only Long Beach, CA came in below the cut, at 48 percent. Washington, D.C. topped the 'yea'-ers with 78 percent.<br />
<br />
The IIHS characterizes the results as "Two-thirds of drivers in 14 big cities with longstanding red light camera programs support their use." Now, we're not saying they're wrong, but we would like to see a larger sampling. The release states that "More than 3,000 people in the 14 study cities were interviewed by cellphone and landline between Feb. 19 and March 29," including folks in Chicago, Phoenix and San Diego. Those three hamlets boast 5,488,632 people, meaning that the survey includes less than a tenth of a percent of the population of those three cities alone, much less the entire 14.<br />
<br />
Follow the link for the particulars. But, as <em>Consumer Reports</em> notes, with the IIHS saying 56 percent of Houstonians are in favor of cameras, but 53 percent of Houstonians rejecting red light cameras, we'll go with the voters and not the respondents for now.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/07/survey-says-u-s-drivers-want-red-light-cameras/">Survey says U.S. drivers want red light cameras</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/07/survey-says-u-s-drivers-want-red-light-cameras/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19983037/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/07/survey-says-u-s-drivers-want-red-light-cameras/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>iihs</category><category>Insurance Institute for Highway Safety</category><category>poll</category><category>red light camera</category><category>red light photo</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19983037/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/07/07/survey-says-u-s-drivers-want-red-light-cameras/19983037/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19983037</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/red-light-photo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: 2011 Ford Explorer vs. 2011 Dodge Durango - What's your pick?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/explorango630opt.jpg" alt="Ford Explorer vs. Dodge Durango" /><br />
<br />
The SUV is dead. Long live the SUV!<br />
<br />
The 2011 <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/durango">Dodge Durango</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/explorer">Ford Explorer</a> are big departures from the models that they replace. Aside from the usual styling and refinement differences, the biggest changes for these vehicle are that they both ditch the traditional body-on-frame sport-utility vehicle DNA in favor of unibody constructions. By our definition, these once-SUVs are now CUVs, though their respective parent companies continue to brand them as being traditional sport-utes through and through.<br />
<br />
Both the Durango and Explorer offer available seating for seven and all-wheel drive, but that's where the similarities start to taper off. Each vehicle offers a choice of two different powertrains, but while <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/dodge/">Dodge</a> has opted to go a more traditional route with by fielding the Durango with both 3.6-liter V6 and 5.7-liter V8 engines, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> has gone in the opposite direction by equipping the Explorer with a 2.0-liter EcoBoost inline-four and a 3.5-liter V6. There are pros and cons for each - the Explorer may prove to be more fuel-efficient, but the Durango ought to tow more.<br />
<br />
Each of these new crossovers tries to stay true to the traditional SUV mindset, just in different directions. Ford's Terrain Management system will surely come in handy for people who need more off-road prowess, though the end result remains that the Explorer is arguably more of a tall wagon than an honest SUV. The Durango keeps things a bit more and has a strong, presence that we suspect will still be well-received by people who prefer honest-to-goodness sport-utility vehicles.<br />
<br />
We could debate the pros and cons of each vehicle all day, and indeed, we're still waiting for the Full Monty-worth of details and specifications, but we still want to know: What do you think? If you had to choose either the Explorer or Durango, which would get your pick? Cast your vote in the poll below and be sure to sound off with your thoughts in Comments.<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/#poll52245">View Poll</a></p><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-durango">2011 Dodge Durango</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-durango/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/dg011009du_thumbnail.jpg" alt="2011 Dodge Durango" title="2011 Dodge Durango" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-durango/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/dg011013du_thumbnail.jpg" alt="2011 Dodge Durango" title="2011 Dodge Durango" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-durango/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/dg011004du_thumbnail.jpg" alt="2011 Dodge Durango" title="2011 Dodge Durango" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-durango/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/dg011005du_thumbnail.jpg" alt="2011 Dodge Durango" title="2011 Dodge Durango" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-durango/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/dg011006du_thumbnail.jpg" alt="2011 Dodge Durango" title="2011 Dodge Durango" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-explorer">2011 Ford Explorer</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-explorer/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/01-2011-ford-explorer_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-explorer/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/02-2011-ford-explorer_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-explorer/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/03-2011-ford-explorer_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-explorer/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/04-2011-ford-explorer_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-explorer/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/05-2011-ford-explorer_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/">Poll: 2011 Ford Explorer vs. 2011 Dodge Durango - What's your pick?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19619160/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 dodge durango</category><category>2011 durango</category><category>2011 ford explorer</category><category>2011DodgeDurango</category><category>2011Durango</category><category>2011FordExplorer</category><category>dodge</category><category>Dodge Durango</category><category>DodgeDurango</category><category>durango explorer</category><category>durango vs explorer</category><category>DurangoExplorer</category><category>DurangoVsExplorer</category><category>explorer</category><category>explorer vs. durango</category><category>ExplorerVs.Durango</category><category>ford</category><category>Ford Explorer</category><category>ford explorer 2011</category><category>FordExplorer</category><category>FordExplorer2011</category><category>poll</category><category>polls</category><category>reader poll</category><category>ReaderPoll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19619160/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/09/02/poll-2011-ford-explorer-vs-2011-dodge-durango-whats-your-pi/19619160/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19619160</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/explorango630opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Shocking Study: Researchers find that men and women don't want the same thing (in cars)]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/27/shocking-study-researchers-find-that-men-and-women-dont-want-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/27/shocking-study-researchers-find-that-men-and-women-dont-want-t/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/27/shocking-study-researchers-find-that-men-and-women-dont-want-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/humor/" rel="tag">Humor</a></p><a href="autos.aol.com/article/male-vs-female-car-shopping/"><img hspace="0" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/danica-cobra.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
This just in: early reports inform us that water is, in fact, still wet. Also, the clever minds at CNW Market Research have discovered that an individual's personal tastes in a vehicle varies greatly depending on gender and age. Shocking, we know. According to the data, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/">women</a> typically base their purchases on rear visibility, cost, front visibility, remote side mirrors and side air bags, in that order. Well, the last three are tied, but pretty much in that order.<br />
<br />
And what about guys? Brace yourself for some life-altering revelations. According to CNW, styling, horsepower, engine design, front visibility and the vehicle's sound system are the top five priorities for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/19/survey-says-men-like-car-interiors-cooler-than-women-in-other-n/">men</a>. At least we can agree on that whole 'being able to see out of the front of the car' bit. And, judging from the photo above, perhaps we can all agree that the Shelby Cobra is pretty dang desirable.<br />
<br />
Of course, the data does help to refute the notion that women are typically more emotional shoppers than men. Clearly, according to the CNW's data, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/15/study-men-cant-help-but-enjoy-fast-cars-its-that-testostero/">testosterone</a> is doing nothing to help us guys make well-informed automotive purchases. Why is that? According to AOL Autos, the answer may have plenty to do with guys simply trying to keep up with their friends in terms of, er, displacement. In an unrelated story, the sky may also be blue, researchers have discovered.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/male-vs-female-car-shopping/">AOL Autos</a> | Image: <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/">SI.com</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/27/shocking-study-researchers-find-that-men-and-women-dont-want-t/">Shocking Study: Researchers find that men and women don't want the same thing (in cars)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/27/shocking-study-researchers-find-that-men-and-women-dont-want-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19565999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/27/shocking-study-researchers-find-that-men-and-women-dont-want-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Car Buying</category><category>car shopping</category><category>CarBuying</category><category>CarShopping</category><category>CNW Market Research</category><category>CNW Marketing Research</category><category>CnwMarketingResearch</category><category>CnwMarketResearch</category><category>Men</category><category>new car</category><category>new car buyers</category><category>new cars</category><category>NewCar</category><category>NewCarBuyers</category><category>NewCars</category><category>Poll</category><category>Research</category><category>Study</category><category>Women</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19565999/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/07/27/shocking-study-researchers-find-that-men-and-women-dont-want-t/19565999/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19565999</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/danica-cobra_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New study suggests that women drive dirtier than men - at least in Britain [w/poll]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uk/" rel="tag">UK</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/20/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/car-wash.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"> </div>
We'll be the first to admit that we're not the most fastidious folks when it comes to a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/28/video-princess-leia-car-wash-no-were-not-kidding/">clean vehicle</a>. It's not that we don't pride ourselves in having a clean-as-can-be car, it's just that there are more pressing things on our schedule most days. The good news is, we're not alone. According to research worked up by Autoquake - an online vehicle retailer in the UK - nearly half of drivers surveyed clean their vehicle in intervals of six months or more. Hey, even we aren't <em>that</em> bad. Even more interestingly, the poll found that women are more likely to leave their ride dirty than men.<br />
<br />
Around 56 percent of the women in the study said that they leave their vehicle <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/08/mr-clean-moving-into-sudsy-world-of-car-washing/">unwashed</a> for six months or more while 44 percent of men said the same. Granted, leaving half a year's worth of grime to eat away at your vehicle's bodywork is bad, but it gets worse: Four percent of those surveyed said that they <em>never</em> clean their vehicle. <br />
<br />
This lead us to wonder - how often do give your vehicle the once-over? Come clean in our poll below, and don't forget to check out the full press release from Autoquake <a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/AllCars/251505/#continued">after the jump</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/#poll49825">View Poll</a></p><br />
<br />
[Source: Autoquake]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New study suggests that women drive dirtier than men - at least in Britain [w/poll]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/">New study suggests that women drive dirtier than men - at least in Britain [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19562717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto cleaner</category><category>AutoCleaner</category><category>autoquake</category><category>car cleaner</category><category>Car Wash</category><category>CarCleaner</category><category>CarWash</category><category>Clean Cars</category><category>CleanCars</category><category>cleaning cars</category><category>CleaningCars</category><category>Dirty Car</category><category>DirtyCar</category><category>Poll</category><category>washing car</category><category>washing cars</category><category>WashingCar</category><category>WashingCars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19562717/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/07/22/new-study-suggests-that-women-drive-dirtier-than-men-at-least/19562717/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19562717</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/car-wash_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Study: Most in-car arguments are over directions. No they aren't. Yes they are.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/21/study-most-in-car-arguments-are-over-directions-no-they-arent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/21/study-most-in-car-arguments-are-over-directions-no-they-arent/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/21/study-most-in-car-arguments-are-over-directions-no-they-arent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/humor/" rel="tag">Humor</a></p><a href="http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/most-arguments-in-the-car-are-over-directions-says-survey/?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/tomtom-250.jpg" class="right border" alt="" /></a>Here's a handy piece of information to keep in mind the next time you hop into the car with your significant other. According to a study commissioned by Halfords - a UK car accessory company - 70 percent of those polled admitted to having an <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/28/for-shame-tiff-needell-makes-argument-for-hp-limit/">argument</a> in a vehicle at least once a month. The biggest cause of friction behind the wheel? <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/bmw-develops-micronavigation-augments-in-car-gps-with-downloada/">Navigation</a>. More than 33 percent of responses said that directions, or the lack there of, are a regular point of contention between couples behind the wheel. A hefty 85 percent of those surveyed said that the clashes began when the driver refused to stop and ask for directions.<br />
<br />
The solution? Pick up a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/07/new-expresso-handheld-gps-can-guide-you-to-the-store-or-out-o/">GPS</a> device, of course. <em>The New York Times</em> says that in a separate study in which 502 people were surveyed, around a quarter of women said that they weren't confident in their sense of direction. Only nine percent of guys said the same, even though 58 percent of men in the study admitted to using personal GPS. Take away the technological aid, mix in a little insecurity, a stressful situation and voila! Instant domestic discord. So cut your partner some slack during this road trip season - they just might repay the favor the next time you're at the helm. <br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/most-arguments-in-the-car-are-over-directions-says-survey/?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">The New York Times</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/21/study-most-in-car-arguments-are-over-directions-no-they-arent/">Study: Most in-car arguments are over directions. No they aren't. Yes they are.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/21/study-most-in-car-arguments-are-over-directions-no-they-arent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19561670/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/21/study-most-in-car-arguments-are-over-directions-no-they-arent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Argument</category><category>Arguments</category><category>Directions</category><category>gps</category><category>gps navigation</category><category>GpsNavigation</category><category>Navigation</category><category>Poll</category><category>Study</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19561670/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/07/21/study-most-in-car-arguments-are-over-directions-no-they-arent/19561670/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19561670</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/tomtom-250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Study: Adults admit to texting while driving more than teens]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/25/study-adults-admit-to-texting-while-driving-more-than-teens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/25/study-adults-admit-to-texting-while-driving-more-than-teens/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/25/study-adults-admit-to-texting-while-driving-more-than-teens/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Cell-Phone-Distractions.aspx"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/42-21638358opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
A poll by Pew Internet, part of the Pew Research Center, has found that 27% of American adults admit to texting while driving. If the teenagers who answered the poll were all telling the truth, that means that more adults are guilty of TWD than teens, who came in at 26%. Even more damning for the Do As I Say, Not As I Do crowd: 44% percent of adults claimed to have been riding with drivers who became dangerous while using cell phones, and 17% of drivers admitted to hitting something or someone while using their cell phones. So let's put down the Blackberry's people, work can wait 'till you get there.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Cell-Phone-Distractions.aspx">Pew Internet</a> | Image: Corbis]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/25/study-adults-admit-to-texting-while-driving-more-than-teens/">Study: Adults admit to texting while driving more than teens</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Cell-Phone-Distractions.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/25/study-adults-admit-to-texting-while-driving-more-than-teens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19523624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/25/study-adults-admit-to-texting-while-driving-more-than-teens/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cell phone</category><category>cellphone</category><category>pew internet</category><category>pew internet and american life project</category><category>pew research center</category><category>PewInternet</category><category>PewInternetAndAmericanLifeProject</category><category>PewResearchCenter</category><category>poll</category><category>study</category><category>teens</category><category>Texting</category><category>Texting while driving</category><category>TextingWhileDriving</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19523624/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/06/25/study-adults-admit-to-texting-while-driving-more-than-teens/19523624/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19523624</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/42-21638358opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[The $16,000 Question: Jetta, Cruze or Focus? [w/poll]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/jettacruzefocusopta.jpg" /><br />
<br />
Just after we flip our calendars to the year 2011, we'll have three new sedans on the street, all poised to compete against one another and priced from around the $16,000 mark - the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/officially-official-2011-volkswagen-jetta-offers-teutonic-titil/">2011 Volkswagen Jetta</a>, <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze">2011 Chevrolet Cruze</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/11/detroit-2010-next-gen-ford-focus-a-c-segment-savior/">2012 Ford Focus</a>. Each car has a lot of positives and we're sure the automotive media will be lining up comparison tests as soon as each are ready. But right now, we want to know what you, the reader, thinks has the makings of the best $16,000 sedan. Read the details and vote for your pick below.<br />
<br />
<strong>2011 Volkswagen Jetta</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Dimensions (inches): length: 182.7, width: 70.1, height: 57.1</li>
    <li>Engines: 2.5-liter inline-five with 170 horsepower, 177 pound-feet of torque; 2.0-liter turbo-diesel four with 140 hp, 236 lb-ft; 2.0-liter turbocharged four with 200 hp, 207 lb-ft; six-speed automatic, dual-clutch and manual transmissions will be available</li>
    <li>Fuel economy: Over 40 mpg for TDI diesel models</li>
    <li>Available features: Navigation, Bluetooth, 60/40 split rear seat</li>
</ul>
<strong>2011 Chevrolet Cruze</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Dimensions (inches): length: 181.0, width: 70.7, height: 58.1, wheelbase: 105.7</li>
    <li>Engines: 1.8-liter naturally aspirated inline-four with 138 horsepower and 125 pound-feet of torque; 1.4-liter turbocharged four with 138 hp and 148 lb-ft; six-speed manual and automatic transmissions available</li>
    <li>Fuel economy: 40 mpg for Eco models</li>
    <li>Available features: Bluetooth, USB connectivity, OnStar support</li>
</ul>
<strong>2012 Ford Focus </strong>
<ul>
    <li>Dimensions (inches): length: 179, width: 72, height: 58, wheelbase: 104</li>
    <li>Engines: 2.0-liter naturally aspirated inline-four with 155 horsepower, 145 pound-feet of torque, mated to a five-speed manual or six-speed dual-clutch automatic; 2.0-liter EcoBoost turbocharged four reportedly in the works with 240-plus hp and a six-speed manual</li>
    <li>Fuel economy: 40 mpg highway targeted for base 2.0-liter model</li>
    <li>Available features: SYNC, active park assist, navigation</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/#poll48102">View Poll</a></p><br />
<br />
<em>Note: Official specifications for the 2011 Jetta and 2012 Focus have not been released as of this writing, but these are the details that Autoblog has learned through industry sources.</em><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-volkswagen-jetta">2011 Volkswagen Jetta</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-volkswagen-jetta/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/db2010au00678medium_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-volkswagen-jetta/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/db2010au00677medium_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-volkswagen-jetta/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/db2010au00681medium_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-volkswagen-jetta/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/db2010au00680medium_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-volkswagen-jetta/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/db2010au00679medium_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-quick-spin">Quick Spin: 2011 Chevrolet Cruze</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-quick-spin/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/01chevycruzeqs2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-quick-spin/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/02chevycruzeqs2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-quick-spin/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/03chevycruzeqs2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-quick-spin/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/04chevycruzeqs2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-quick-spin/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/05chevycruzeqs2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-focus">2012 Ford Focus</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-focus/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/nextgenfordfocus000_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-focus/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/nextgenfordfocus001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-focus/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/nextgenfordfocus002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-focus/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/nextgenfordfocus003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-focus/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/nextgenfordfocus004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/">The $16,000 Question: Jetta, Cruze or Focus? [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19517585/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 chevrolet cruze</category><category>2011 volkswagen jetta</category><category>2011ChevroletCruze</category><category>2011VolkswagenJetta</category><category>2012 ford focus</category><category>2012FordFocus</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet cruze</category><category>ChevroletCruze</category><category>cruze</category><category>focus</category><category>ford</category><category>ford focus</category><category>FordFocus</category><category>jetta</category><category>poll</category><category>polls</category><category>volkswagen</category><category>Volkswagen Jetta</category><category>VolkswagenJetta</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19517585/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/06/15/the-16-000-question-focus-cruze-or-jetta-w-poll/19517585/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19517585</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/jettacruzefocusopta_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Buick Regal five-door possible, wagon unlikely [w/poll]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/opel/" rel="tag">Opel</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2011-buick-regal-in-germany/#2959403"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/regal-sedan-hatch.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Opel Insignia hatch (left) Buick Regal sedan (right)</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
When the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/regal">Buick Regal</a> goes on sale in the U.S. later this month, it will only be available as a four-door sedan. However, the Regal's German twin, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/opel/">Opel</a> Insignia, is available as either a five-door hatchback or a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/opel-insignia-sports-tourer-0/">station wagon, dubbed the "sports tourer</a>." During our recent jaunt to Germany, we spoke with Buick officials about offering alternate body styles, and were particularly enamored by the Insignia OPC Sports Tourer with its 325 turbocharged V6 and all-wheel drive. <br />
<br />
Alas, Buick sales and marketing manager Craig Bierley told us that chances of the wagon making it to America are slim (but not impossible). What's more likely to make it to the U.S. is the five-door. Buick thinks the hatch has a better chance of success in the States because it doesn't look like a hatchback. In fact, aside from slighter shorter rear decklid and more raked rear glass, it's difficult to distinguish from the sedan while still offering the extra utility of the large cargo opening. If the Regal proves successful in the States, the hatch variant could arrive in a year or two. The question is, what do you want?<br />
<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/#poll45953">View Poll</a></p><br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/opel-insignia-sports-tourer-0">Opel Insignia Sports Tourer</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/opel-insignia-sports-tourer-0/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/263459_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/opel-insignia-sports-tourer-0/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/261711_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/opel-insignia-sports-tourer-0/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/257880_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/opel-insignia-sports-tourer-0/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/260037_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/opel-insignia-sports-tourer-0/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/261109_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2011-buick-regal-in-germany">First Drive: 2011 Buick Regal in Germany</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2011-buick-regal-in-germany/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/buickregalgermany---01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2011-buick-regal-in-germany/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/buickregalgermany---02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2011-buick-regal-in-germany/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/buickregalgermany---03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2011-buick-regal-in-germany/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/buickregalgermany---04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2011-buick-regal-in-germany/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/buickregalgermany---05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/">Buick Regal five-door possible, wagon unlikely [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 14:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19467459/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buick</category><category>Buick Regal</category><category>buick regal hatchback</category><category>buick regal wagon</category><category>BuickRegal</category><category>BuickRegalHatchback</category><category>BuickRegalWagon</category><category>opel</category><category>opel insignia</category><category>Opel Insignia Buick</category><category>opel insignia buick regal</category><category>opel insignia hatchback</category><category>Opel Insignia OPC Sports Tourer</category><category>Opel Insignia Sports Tourer</category><category>OpelInsignia</category><category>OpelInsigniaBuick</category><category>OpelInsigniaBuickRegal</category><category>OpelInsigniaHatchback</category><category>OpelInsigniaOpcSportsTourer</category><category>OpelInsigniaSportsTourer</category><category>poll</category><category>regal</category><category>regal hatchback</category><category>regal wagon</category><category>RegalHatchback</category><category>RegalWagon</category><category>station wagon</category><category>station wagons</category><category>StationWagon</category><category>StationWagons</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19467459/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/05/07/buick-regal-five-door-possible-wagon-unlikely-w-poll/19467459/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19467459</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/regal-sedan-hatch_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Foose/Deere 4020 vs John Deere 620 Orchard]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/special-limited-editions/" rel="tag">Specialty</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/#continued"><img hspace="0" height="194" width="630" vspace="4" border="1" align="top" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/foosevsorchard.jpg" alt="Foose/Deere 4020 vs John Deere 620 Orchard Model" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Which one would you choose? The Chip Foose John Deere 4020 or a John Deere 620 orchard model? Vote <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/#continued">after the jump</a>!</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/video-chip-foose-gets-agricultural-hot-rods-a-john-deere-4020/">Chip Foose's John Deere 4020</a> is pretty kickass, but the reality is this: You needn't enlist the services of a famous pro rodder to get a slick-lookin' John Deere tractor. Take, for instance, the John Deere 620 orchard model shown above. Standard-issue 620s have a traditional tractor look to them, but the ones fitted with the additional orchard equipment have a streamlined appearance that looks like it's a set of giant-sized moon caps away from making a land speed record run at Bonneville. <br />
<br />
In fact, all that extra bodywork has nothing to do with aerodynamics or improved performance; its shielding designed to let the tractor operate in an orchard without the tires causing damage to the the tree branches. So, not only does this 620 look great, it does so for totally functional reasons. <br />
<br />
And so, we come to tonight's poll: Which one of these tractors would you rather have? <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/#continued">Follow the jump</a> and declare your Deere. <br />
<br />
[John Deere 620 image via <a href="http://www.tractorclocks.com/jdimages/jd.html">TractorClocks.com</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Poll: Foose/Deere 4020 vs John Deere 620 Orchard</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/">Poll: Foose/Deere 4020 vs John Deere 620 Orchard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19386656/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chip foose</category><category>ChipFoose</category><category>john deere</category><category>john deere 4020</category><category>john deere 620</category><category>JohnDeere</category><category>JohnDeere4020</category><category>JohnDeere620</category><category>orchard model</category><category>OrchardModel</category><category>poll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19386656/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/03/07/poll-foose-deere-4020-vs-john-deere-620-orchard/19386656/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19386656</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/foosevsorchard_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[POLL: Do you care about the Indy 500?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/#comments"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/indy-super-fan-500-580.jpg" /></a><br /> <br />The 93rd running of the Indianapolis 500 will take place tomorrow at noon. ABC will provide the usual live coverage, and viewers will watch to see if pole-sitter Helio Castroneves manages to do his Spider-Man thing at the race's conclusion. Or if Danica makes history. Or maybe you're just looking for a race - and a finish - as exciting as the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT9R8xwu6rY&amp;feature=related">spectacular ending</a> to the 2006 Indy 500. <br /><br />Or maybe you don't care anymore. <br /><br />Maybe you tuned out after the nasty CART/IRL split and never looked back. <br /><br />So here we are, into the second season of the freshly-reunited Indy Racing League, hours away from its signature event - the most storied race in American motorsports. The <a href="http://www.indy500.com/grid/">starting grid</a> boasts plenty of fast drivers. Young ones, too. Some are scions of Indy legends. But the variety pretty much ends there. Everyone's running a Dallara chassis with a Honda engine. Fast as hell, to be sure-Helio qualified with an average speed of 224.824 mph. But still, to many, the 500 now almost feels more like a habitual event instead of the massively-important, "Capital-E" Event it was prior to 1996. <br /><br />So here's where we toss it to you. Do you care about Indy anymore? Did you ever? Are you planning to watch the 500? Vote <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/">after the jump</a>, and comment away.<br /><br />[Image: Jamie Squire/Getty]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>POLL: Do you care about the Indy 500?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/">POLL: Do you care about the Indy 500?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 23 May 2009 18:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1554725/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2009 indy 500</category><category>2009Indy500</category><category>indianapolis 500</category><category>Indianapolis500</category><category>indy 500</category><category>Indy500</category><category>poll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1554725/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/05/23/poll-do-you-care-about-the-indy-500-anymore/1554725/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1554725</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/indy-super-fan-500-580_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Fast &amp; Furious franchise framers feeling fine for fifth film? [w/POLL]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/fast-and-furious-4/999401/"><img width="580" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="389" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/image003.jpg" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><small style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Click above to see a gallery of stills from The Fast and The Furious 4</small><br /></div>
<br />Amazing what a huge opening weekend at the box office can do. After debuting with a record-breaking <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/06/vin-number-fast-and-furious-shatters-records-with-72-5m-opening/">$72.5 million haul</a> in its first few days, the fourth installment,<em> Fast &amp; Furious</em> tapered off a bit last week at $28 million, but that hasn't slowed the franchise one little bit. <br /><br />In an interview on Friday with Los Angeles radio station 104.3MYfm, star Paul Walker said that a fifth installment is practically a sure thing now: "This was supposed to be it - but without question, Vin and I will be coming back, we're making the fifth one and we're going to Brazil." We hate to say we told you so, but... well, we did. <br /><br />Based on the results of our previous poll, we're guessing that most of you will be up for another go assuming the trailers and buzz show it to be at least as good as the current film. But what do you think? Is a fifth installment with some Brazilian flair worth doing? Will you see it if they make it? Take our poll after the jump and let us know.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30172616/">MSNBC</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fast &amp; Furious franchise framers feeling fine for fifth film? [w/POLL]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/">Fast &amp; Furious franchise framers feeling fine for fifth film? [w/POLL]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1517198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>fast and furious</category><category>fast and furious 4</category><category>fast and the furious</category><category>FastAndFurious</category><category>FastAndFurious4</category><category>FastAndTheFurious</category><category>paul walker</category><category>PaulWalker</category><category>poll</category><category>report</category><category>tfatf</category><category>tfatf 4</category><category>tfatf4</category><category>vin diesel</category><category>VinDiesel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1517198/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/04/15/fast-and-furious-franchise-framers-feeling-fine-for-fifth-film-w/1517198/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1517198</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/image003_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[STUDY: 76% of Americans believe economy can survive without GM]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/study-76-of-americans-believe-economy-can-survive-without-gm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/study-76-of-americans-believe-economy-can-survive-without-gm/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/study-76-of-americans-believe-economy-can-survive-without-gm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090401/BUSINESS01/90401073/1014/U.S.+poll++Economy+can+survive+without+GM"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/gm_bk_ok.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />According to <em>The Detroit Free Press</em>, Rasmussen Reports called 1,000 people and asked them if they believed "the economy could recover without General Motors in business." The results were clear: 76% of respondents said "Yes, it can." The sentiment against any more taxpayer money being used to assist automakers was clear as well: 62% said neither GM nor Chrysler should receive any more loans.<br /><br />Just as interestingly, the public appears to expect failure from one of the two companies: Fully 59% said that it was "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that GM or Chrysler will go out of business in the next few years.<br /><br />Yet while the results of this survey are clear, it could be that the first question itself is slightly misleading: The economy could recover without a lot of companies, including AIG and Citibank. After all, you can't really <em>kill</em> an economy as long as there are people left to exchange goods and services, right? The real issue is whether people are prepared and willing to deal with the fallout from such companies going out of business.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090401/BUSINESS01/90401073/1014/U.S.+poll++Economy+can+survive+without+GM">Detroit Free Press</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/study-76-of-americans-believe-economy-can-survive-without-gm/">STUDY: 76% of Americans believe economy can survive without GM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/article/20090401/BUSINESS01/90401073/1014/U.S.+poll++Economy+can+survive+without+GM>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/study-76-of-americans-believe-economy-can-survive-without-gm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1505413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/study-76-of-americans-believe-economy-can-survive-without-gm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>financials</category><category>gm</category><category>gm bailout</category><category>gm bankruptcy</category><category>gm bridge loan</category><category>GmBailout</category><category>GmBankruptcy</category><category>GmBridgeLoan</category><category>poll</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1505413/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/04/02/study-76-of-americans-believe-economy-can-survive-without-gm/1505413/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1505413</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/gm_bk_ok_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Detroit News</i> web poll asks if buying a foreign car is un-American]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/16/i-detroit-news-i-web-poll-asks-if-buying-a-foreign-car-is-un/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/16/i-detroit-news-i-web-poll-asks-if-buying-a-foreign-car-is-un/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/16/i-detroit-news-i-web-poll-asks-if-buying-a-foreign-car-is-un/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://info.detnews.com/redesign/forums/autostalk/lettersindex.cfm?topic=car_wars"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/detnews_import_unamerican.jpg" /></a><br /><br />It's really hard to figure what's dumber here: the <em>Detroit News</em> "CyberSurvey" that asks, in the wake of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/15/foreign-autos-vandalized-to-promote-buying-american/">vandalism</a> (four cars) that took place in the Detroit area over the weekend, "Is buying a foreign car un-American?" or the fact that 60% of respondents answer it in the affirmative. Good grief. A quick refresher for everyone: the American thing is to buy <em>whatever car you like</em>. That's one of the nice things about living here, having the freedom to make that choice without it becoming a litmus test on your patriotism. Expect more stuff like this as the histrionics regarding the Detroit bailout climb to new heights with each passing day that doesn't include a White House press conference making it official. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://info.detnews.com/redesign/forums/autostalk/lettersindex.cfm?topic=car_wars">The Detroit News</a> via <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/bailout-watch-291-detn-fans-the-flames-of-hatred/">TTAC</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/16/i-detroit-news-i-web-poll-asks-if-buying-a-foreign-car-is-un/"><i>Detroit News</i> web poll asks if buying a foreign car is un-American</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/16/i-detroit-news-i-web-poll-asks-if-buying-a-foreign-car-is-un/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1402938/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/16/i-detroit-news-i-web-poll-asks-if-buying-a-foreign-car-is-un/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buying american</category><category>buying foreign</category><category>BuyingAmerican</category><category>BuyingForeign</category><category>detroit news</category><category>DetroitNews</category><category>foreign cars</category><category>ForeignCars</category><category>poll</category><category>vandalism</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1402938/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/12/16/i-detroit-news-i-web-poll-asks-if-buying-a-foreign-car-is-un/1402938/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1402938</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/detnews_import_unamerican_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New York 2008: Top debuts of the show (w/ Poll)]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/new-york-auto-show/" rel="tag">New York Auto Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suzuki/" rel="tag">Suzuki</a></p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aUwgTJVpVR8&amp;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aUwgTJVpVR8&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />The 2008 New York Auto Show press preview is in the books, and now it's the public's turn to roam the floor in the Javits Center. After thinking things over, we thought we'd put together a video of our top five most significant introductions from the show. New York served as a launching pad for exciting new vehicles like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/new-york-2008-hyundai-genesis-coupe-live/">Hyundai Genesis Coupe</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/new-york-2008-the-saleen-s5s-raptor-is-all-claw/">Saleen S5S Raptor</a>, so there were some winners to choose from. Click play on the video above to see our picks for the most significant debuts, and follow the jump to check out the high-res shots from the show floor and place your vote for which ride you think deserves the number one spot.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York 2008: Top debuts of the show (w/ Poll)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/">New York 2008: Top debuts of the show (w/ Poll)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1146570/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Auto Show</category><category>Autoblog 5</category><category>Autoblog5</category><category>AutoShow</category><category>Hyundai Genesis Coupe</category><category>HyundaiGenesisCoupe</category><category>Kia Koup</category><category>KiaKoup</category><category>New York 2008</category><category>NewYork2008</category><category>poll</category><category>polls</category><category>Pontiac Solstice Coupe</category><category>PontiacSolsticeCoupe</category><category>Saleen S5S Raptor</category><category>SaleenS5sRaptor</category><category>Suzuki</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:55:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1146570/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/03/22/new-york-2008-top-debuts-from-new-york/1146570/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1146570</postid>
<thumbnail></thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Online voters name upcoming Alfa hatch "Furiosa"]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/21/online-voters-name-upcoming-alfa-hatch-furiosa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/21/online-voters-name-upcoming-alfa-hatch-furiosa/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/21/online-voters-name-upcoming-alfa-hatch-furiosa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/alfa-romeo/" rel="tag">Alfa Romeo</a></p><a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/hatchbacks/alfa-romeo-asks-you-to-name-its-next-car/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/alfa-junior-sketch-rear.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Furiosa. That's what the new hatchback from Alfa Romeo will be called, by virtue of an international competition to choose the car's name.<br /><br />The Italian automaker is getting farther away from the Alfa-numeric (pun intended) nomenclature and giving its models more emotive nameplates instead. The web contest offered online voters a choice of twelve names, and Furiosa got the most votes, beating out Agea, Enos, Everson, Fira, Milo, Mod, Nevo, Solea, Sparvo, Velvetta and Ventura. While some proposals had merit, some of the rejected names were a little cheesy (try to figure out which). <br /><br />So we can stop calling it the Alfa Junior. The Furiosa is <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/02/mini-8c-alfa-jr-set-for-geneva-debut/">anticipated to make its debut at the Geneva show</a> in March. We're so there.<br /><br />[Source: Motor Authority]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/21/online-voters-name-upcoming-alfa-hatch-furiosa/">Online voters name upcoming Alfa hatch "Furiosa"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/news/hatchbacks/alfa-romeo-asks-you-to-name-its-next-car/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/21/online-voters-name-upcoming-alfa-hatch-furiosa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1042671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/21/online-voters-name-upcoming-alfa-hatch-furiosa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4c</category><category>alfa</category><category>contest</category><category>furiosa</category><category>hatch</category><category>junior</category><category>online</category><category>poll</category><category>romeo</category><category>vote</category><category>website</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1042671/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/11/21/online-voters-name-upcoming-alfa-hatch-furiosa/1042671/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1042671</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/alfa-junior-sketch-rear_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Aw Snap! Poll reveals most Germans want speed limit on Autobahn]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/aw-snap-poll-reveals-most-germans-want-speed-limit-on-autobahn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/aw-snap-poll-reveals-most-germans-want-speed-limit-on-autobahn/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/aw-snap-poll-reveals-most-germans-want-speed-limit-on-autobahn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070316/REUTERSANE/70316020/1116/REUTERSANE"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/autobahnab.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />Three days ago we <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/13/eu-wants-to-cap-speeds-on-autobahn/">scoffed</a> at an EU official's suggestion that a speed limit should be applied to the remaining sections of Germany's famous Autobahn that remain free to speed. While reports indicated that speed-loving Germans were up in arms over the idea, a recent poll shows that two in three believe a speed limit should be instituted. Whaa? Conducted by ZDF television, the poll showed that 54% of those surveyed favor an 80 mph speed limit, while 10% would like a limit even lower. There were still around 35% of the respondents, which would thankfully include German Transport Minister Wolfgang Tiefensee if he were polled, who don't want a speed limit at all. <br /><br />The controversy over speed limits on the Autobahn stems from suggestions that an over excited right foot leads to lots of wasted energy, which obviously ain't too good for the environment. Interestingly, the survey also showed that 56% of those polled think flights should be taxed more because of their negative impact on the environment. Yeah, that's right! Cap our cars, we'll tax your planes!<br /><br />[Source: Automotive News - sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/aw-snap-poll-reveals-most-germans-want-speed-limit-on-autobahn/">Aw Snap! Poll reveals most Germans want speed limit on Autobahn</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070316/REUTERSANE/70316020/1116/REUTERSANE>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/aw-snap-poll-reveals-most-germans-want-speed-limit-on-autobahn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/854169/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/aw-snap-poll-reveals-most-germans-want-speed-limit-on-autobahn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autobahn</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>poll</category><category>speed limit</category><category>speed limits</category><category>SpeedLimit</category><category>SpeedLimits</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/854169/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/03/16/aw-snap-poll-reveals-most-germans-want-speed-limit-on-autobahn/854169/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>854169</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/autobahnab_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford Falcon XR Ute Rip Curl Edition challenges Renault's Rip Curl Clio for surf-brand supremacy (with  Poll!)]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/07/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition-challenges-renaults-rip-cur/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/07/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition-challenges-renaults-rip-cur/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/07/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition-challenges-renaults-rip-cur/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/misc-auto-shows/" rel="tag">Misc. Auto Shows</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition/176205/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/falconute_ripcurl.jpg" /></a><br /><em>Click photo to enlarge</em><br /><br />Sure, this week's all about Geneva, but there are still some stragglers left over from Melbourne that we want to make mention of. Take the above, for example -- it's Ford Australia's Falcon XR Ute Rip Curl Edition. As you might surmise, the neo-Ranchero is adorned with Rip Curl decals, advertising the tie-in with the surf gear manufacturer. It's also equipped with options like Rip Curl-logoed waterproof seat covers, an uplevel audio system, Momo steering wheel, and nice-looking 18" wheels. Engine choices include gasoline inline-6es both NA and turbocharged, a V8, and even an LPG six.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/renault-clio-rip-curl-edition/"><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="122" border="0" align="right" alt="Renault Rip Curl Clio" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/clio_ripcurl_lo_08.jpg" /></a>Now, in case you missed it the first time around, this isn't the only Rip Curl-branded ride we've written about in recent weeks. Back on Feb 12th, we showed you <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/12/surfs-up-renault-makes-waves-with-clio-rip-curl-edition/" style="font-weight: bold;">Renault's Rip Curl Clio</a>, a similar branding exercise for the European market. <br /><br />This, of course, begs the question: if you had to pick one, which would it be? We've set up a poll in which you can vote for your fave. Don't surf? Who cares! It's all in non-scientific good fun, as many of you likely reside in North America, where the closest we'll get to either car is the enclosed photos. One thing's for sure: we're all armed with opinions. Clio or Falconchero? Make your voices heard! We'll post the results tomorrow. <br /><br /><!-- // Begin Pollhost.com Poll Code // -->
<form method="post" action="http://poll.pollhost.com/vote.cgi">
    <table width="150" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" border="0" bgcolor="#eeeeee">
        <tbody>
            <tr>
                <td colspan="2"><font size="-1" face="Arial" color="#000000"><strong>Which Rip Curl-edition vehicle would you rather drive to the beach?</strong></font></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td width="5"><input type="radio" name="answer" value="1" /></td>
                <td><font size="-1" face="Arial" color="#000000">Ford Australia's Falcon XR Ute Rip Curl Edition</font></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td width="5"><input type="radio" name="answer" value="2" /></td>
                <td><font size="-1" face="Arial" color="#000000">Renault's Rip Curl Clio</font></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td colspan="2"><input type="hidden" name="config" value="d2VibG9nc2luYwkxMTczMjQwMzE0CUVFRUVFRQkwMDAwMDAJQXJpYWwJQXNzb3J0ZWQ" /><center><input type="submit" value="Vote" /> <input type="submit" name="view" value="View" /></center></td>
            </tr>
        </tbody>
    </table>
</form>
<br />[Source: Ford Australia]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/07/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition-challenges-renaults-rip-cur/">Ford Falcon XR Ute Rip Curl Edition challenges Renault's Rip Curl Clio for surf-brand supremacy (with  Poll!)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/07/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition-challenges-renaults-rip-cur/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/846290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/07/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition-challenges-renaults-rip-cur/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>falcon xr ute</category><category>FalconXrUte</category><category>ford falcon ute</category><category>FordFalconUte</category><category>poll</category><category>renault</category><category>rip cirl</category><category>rip curl clio</category><category>rip curl edition</category><category>RipCirl</category><category>RipCurlClio</category><category>RipCurlEdition</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/846290/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/03/07/ford-falcon-xr-ute-rip-curl-edition-challenges-renaults-rip-cur/846290/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>846290</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/falconute_ripcurl_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[POLL: Should Pontiac change its logo?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/13/poll-should-pontiac-change-its-logo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/13/poll-should-pontiac-change-its-logo/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/13/poll-should-pontiac-change-its-logo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/x08pn_g8006a_450.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br />Seems like more than a few automakers still believe that little tweaks can have a big impact. Consider all the hoopla over <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/07/fords-mark-fields-announces-bold-move-bring-back-taurus-and-sabl/">Ford reviving the Taurus and Sable names</a>. Likewise, Pontiac actually unveiled a new concept logo at the Chicago Auto Show last week that could be found between the nostril-like grilles of the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/07/chicago-auto-show-gm-rwd-fans-can-rejoice-for-the-pontiac-g8-h/">G8 sedan</a>. Unlike the <a href="http://www.cartype.com/page.cfm?id=721&amp;alph=ALL&amp;dec=ALL">current logo</a> that's been around for as long as we can remember, the new one is monochromatic with a bezel of chrome that surrounds a textured silver inlay. Pontiac says the logo on the G8 is technically a concept, and that reaction to it by the public will be gauged to determine whether or not a change is called for. No doubt some will decry the lack of that passtionate red in the logo's center that has been Pontiac's unofficial-official color. Unfortunately, the red never made Pontiac any more passionate of a brand, so perhaps clinging to it for sentimental reasons is a bit silly. So we want to know (and we're sure Pontiac does, too) whether or not you like the new logo. <br /><br /><!-- // Begin Pollhost.com Poll Code // -->
<form action="http://poll.pollhost.com/vote.cgi" method="post">
    <table width="150" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" border="0" bgcolor="#eeeeee">
        <tbody>
            <tr>
                <td colspan="2"><font size="-1" face="Arial" color="#000000"><strong>Do you dig Pontiac's concept logo?</strong></font></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td width="5"><input type="radio" value="1" name="answer" /></td>
                <td><font size="-1" face="Arial" color="#000000">Yeah, it's time for a change!</font></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td width="5"><input type="radio" value="2" name="answer" /></td>
                <td><font size="-1" face="Arial" color="#000000">No, where's the red?</font></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td colspan="2"><input type="hidden" value="d2VibG9nc2luYwkxMTcxMzk3OTM5CUVFRUVFRQkwMDAwMDAJQXJpYWwJQXNzb3J0ZWQ" name="config" /><center><input type="submit" value="Vote" />  <input type="submit" value="View" name="view" /></center></td>
            </tr>
        </tbody>
    </table>
</form>
<!-- // End Pollhost.com Poll Code // --><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/13/poll-should-pontiac-change-its-logo/">POLL: Should Pontiac change its logo?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/13/poll-should-pontiac-change-its-logo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/753404/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/13/poll-should-pontiac-change-its-logo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>badge</category><category>logo</category><category>poll</category><category>pontiac</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/753404/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/02/13/poll-should-pontiac-change-its-logo/753404/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>753404</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/x08pn_g8006a_450_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
