<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Rumormill: Bugatti and Bentley join forces to battle Rolls-Royce]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/09/rumormill-bugatti-and-bentley-join-forces-to-battle-rolls-royce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/09/rumormill-bugatti-and-bentley-join-forces-to-battle-rolls-royce/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/09/rumormill-bugatti-and-bentley-join-forces-to-battle-rolls-royce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bentley/" rel="tag">Bentley</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bugatti/" rel="tag">Bugatti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/bugatti-and-bentley-building-rolls-royce-competitor-ar65086.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/bug_sed_rr.jpg" /></a><br /><br />The whisperers have it that Bugatti may be borrowing from Bentley for a new sedan. What they can't seem to pinpoint is exactly what kind of sharing the two marques will be doing, and whether or not the resulting super Bug will be a supremely high-powered four-door to compete with the Rolls-Royce Phantom. If the two brands do indeed share something, like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/spy-shots-updated-bentley-arnage-in-spain/">the next Arnage's platform</a>, for instance, that might make sense. But just a few months ago, Bugatti said that its next product would be even <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/03/bugatti-the-next-one-will-be-even-more-expensive/ ">more expensive than the Veyron</a>, and lead man Josef Paefgen has also said that there will be no inexpensive Bugatti. <br /><br />A $400,000 sedan wouldn't be inexpensive, true, but compared to $1.6 million for a Veyron, it's a flat-out bargain. Besides, the $242,000 Arnage T, after all the bespoke options, would come perilously close to a $400K Bugatti in price, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/21/spy-shots-2010-bentley-arnage-grows-to-target-phantom/">the next Bentley Arnage is growing</a> in order to fight the Phantom. So if a Bugatti sedan with Bentley underpinnings were that close in price to a Rolls Phantom... then who's Bentley meant to get in the ring with? <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/bugatti-and-bentley-building-rolls-royce-competitor-ar65086.html">TopSpeed</a> via <a href="http://www.germancarblog.com/2008/10/bentley-bugatti-working-together-on.html">German Car Blog</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/09/rumormill-bugatti-and-bentley-join-forces-to-battle-rolls-royce/">Rumormill: Bugatti and Bentley join forces to battle Rolls-Royce</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/bugatti-and-bentley-building-rolls-royce-competitor-ar65086.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/09/rumormill-bugatti-and-bentley-join-forces-to-battle-rolls-royce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1337290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/09/rumormill-bugatti-and-bentley-join-forces-to-battle-rolls-royce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bentley</category><category>bentley arnage</category><category>BentleyArnage</category><category>bugatti</category><category>bugatti sedan</category><category>bugatti successor</category><category>BugattiSedan</category><category>BugattiSuccessor</category><category>phantom</category><category>platform</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><category>rolls-royce phantom</category><category>Rolls-roycePhantom</category><category>sedans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VW and Porsche can't get along, risk future tech and product plans]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/01/vw-and-porsche-cant-get-along-risk-future-tech-and-product-pla/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/01/vw-and-porsche-cant-get-along-risk-future-tech-and-product-pla/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/01/vw-and-porsche-cant-get-along-risk-future-tech-and-product-pla/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080929/ANE03/809289879/1179/ANE"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/p_vs_vw_iii.jpg" /></a><br /><br />In the land of mergers and acquisitions, there are takeovers, there are hostile takeovers, and then there are I'm Gonna Git You Sucka No Matter What takeovers. Porsche's increasingly acrimonious battle to swallow VW is becoming that third option, and the brawl might threaten the short term plans of Porsche, VW and Audi. Porsche wants access to Audi engines and electronics, but VW, which owns more than 99-percent of Audi, won't allow it.<br /><br />Porsche has de facto control of VW, with a 35.1-percent share. The so-called <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/20/porsche-gobbles-up-more-of-vw-while-takeover-is-delayed/">VW Law</a>, which allows the government of Lower Saxony ultimate veto power even though it has only a 20-percent share, has been the broadsword that both VW and Germany have been using to keep Porsche at bay. The law has been struck down at least three times by the EU Commission and a <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080930/ANE02/809309997/1193/ANE">German Court</a>, only to have politicians figure out how to rewrite it without changing the substance of it.<br /><br />VW's supverisory board recently declared it would need to approve any sharing between Porsche and Audi, and at the moment, Porsche can't overrule that decision. Ferdinand Piech, the head of VW, is in a battle with the Porsche family and Wendelin Wiedeking, the CEO of Porsche, over control, and neither is expected to budge. The risk is that since no one knows how this is all going to play out, a battle of egos and punitive reactions could interrupt development of and platform sharing between - and therefore the profits of - all three manufacturers' future products and technology. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080929/ANE03/809289879/1179/ANE">Automotive News</a>, sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/01/vw-and-porsche-cant-get-along-risk-future-tech-and-product-pla/">VW and Porsche can't get along, risk future tech and product plans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20080929/ANE03/809289879/1179/ANE>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/01/vw-and-porsche-cant-get-along-risk-future-tech-and-product-pla/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1328441/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/01/vw-and-porsche-cant-get-along-risk-future-tech-and-product-pla/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>euro</category><category>europe</category><category>lower saxony</category><category>LowerSaxony</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><category>porsche</category><category>porsche vw</category><category>PorscheVw</category><category>technology</category><category>volkswagen</category><category>vw</category><category>vw law</category><category>VwLaw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler's next sedan could be a Nissan Altima (or a Fiat)]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/31/chrysler-may-borrow-fiat-nissan-platform-for-next-midsize-sedan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/31/chrysler-may-borrow-fiat-nissan-platform-for-next-midsize-sedan/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/31/chrysler-may-borrow-fiat-nissan-platform-for-next-midsize-sedan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/fiat/" rel="tag">Fiat</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/project-nissan.jpg" alt="" /><em>Motor Trend</em> is reporting that Chrysler is considering a few different options now for its 2012 midsize offerings. The first option is to stick with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/chrysler-working-on-project-d-to-replace-sebring-avenger/">Project D</a>, which is gobbling up engineering and design resources. Option two is to use either Fiat's premium midsize platform or the Nissan Altima platform, and design and engineer the rest of the vehicle from scratch. Chrysler can also decide to badge-engineer one of the vehicles, which would be a far cry from the original plan to have many vehicles spawned off one platform.<br />
<p>Since Fiat currently doesn't have any infrastructure in the U.S. and Nissan already has ties with Chrysler (Dodge will be building the next Nissan Titan and Nissan will be building the Hornet out of Versa parts), the Japanese automaker makes more sense.<br /></p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2008/112_0807_chrysler_project_d_update/index.html">Motor Trend</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/31/chrysler-may-borrow-fiat-nissan-platform-for-next-midsize-sedan/">Chrysler's next sedan could be a Nissan Altima (or a Fiat)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2008/112_0807_chrysler_project_d_update/index.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/31/chrysler-may-borrow-fiat-nissan-platform-for-next-midsize-sedan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1271372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/31/chrysler-may-borrow-fiat-nissan-platform-for-next-midsize-sedan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>fiat</category><category>midsize platform</category><category>MidsizePlatform</category><category>nissan</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW and Fiat teaming up for new small car platform]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-and-fiat-teaming-up-for-new-small-car-platform/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-and-fiat-teaming-up-for-new-small-car-platform/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-and-fiat-teaming-up-for-new-small-car-platform/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/fiat/" rel="tag">Fiat</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKL0843558820080708"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/fiat-bmw-logo.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Fiat wants to become the platform-sharing kings of Europe, and with deals with Tata, Suzuki, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/31/2009-ford-ka-unofficially-revealed/">Ford</a>, and PSA, the Italian automaker is well on its way. Fiat Group CEO Sergio Marchionne told <em>Automotive News Europe</em> that another cooperation would be announced tomorrow, but details were scarce. Suppliers in the know are saying that a new deal is imminent to share the next generation Punto platform with BMW. The platform would be used to underpin the third generation MINI, which would help keep BMW engineers out of the FWD business and cut costs for Fiat at the same time. Fiat has been trying to produce a competitor to the popular MINI Cooper, and now it appears the Italian automaker will be working with an even playing field when it comes to platforms.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKL0843558820080708">Reuters</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-and-fiat-teaming-up-for-new-small-car-platform/">BMW and Fiat teaming up for new small car platform</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKL0843558820080708>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-and-fiat-teaming-up-for-new-small-car-platform/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1248757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-and-fiat-teaming-up-for-new-small-car-platform/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>fiat</category><category>mini</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VW, Porsche fighting over timetable of next Touareg, Cayenne]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/20/vw-porsche-fighting-over-timetable-of-next-touareg-cayenne/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/20/vw-porsche-fighting-over-timetable-of-next-touareg-cayenne/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/20/vw-porsche-fighting-over-timetable-of-next-touareg-cayenne/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/porsche-vw.jpg" /><br /><br />To the victors go the spoils, and with Porsche currently holding majority ownership of the drastically larger VW, the folks from Stuttgart get to call the product plan timing shots. The <a href="http://autos.aol.com/volkswagen-touareg-2007:8855-overview">Touareg</a> and <a href="http://autos.aol.com/porsche-cayenne-2008:9163-overview">Cayenne</a> were launched together in late 2002 and refreshed for the 2008 model year, but Porsche wants the redesign of their best-selling product to arrive early in 2010, many months ahead of the Touareg. The problem, however, is that the two products are competitors. <br /><br />If it doesn't seem like a VW and Porsche could ever compete head to head, this is the one obvious exception. Of course, both vehicles sit on the same platform, but the two SUVs also share a V6 engine, and the diesel Touareg can cost you over $75,000, which is definitely Porsche territory. <em>AutoWeek</em> quotes one executive as saying that if the situation doesn't get ironed out, the CEOs would have to "hammer this out." We don't find it surprising that VW is feeling a bit slighted here, because six or seven months can feel like a lifetime in product development, and the two SUVs already have an abnormally-long first generation lifespan. It'll be interesting to see who wins out in this battle.<br /><br />[Source: AutoWeek]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/20/vw-porsche-fighting-over-timetable-of-next-touareg-cayenne/">VW, Porsche fighting over timetable of next Touareg, Cayenne</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070619/FREE/70619003/1530/FREE>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/20/vw-porsche-fighting-over-timetable-of-next-touareg-cayenne/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/921899/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/20/vw-porsche-fighting-over-timetable-of-next-touareg-cayenne/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cayenne</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><category>porsche</category><category>suv wars</category><category>SuvWars</category><category>touareg</category><category>vw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM to give Chrysler some GMT900 love?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/gm-to-give-chrysler-some-gmt900-love/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/gm-to-give-chrysler-some-gmt900-love/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/gm-to-give-chrysler-some-gmt900-love/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/daimlerchrysler/" rel="tag">Daimler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/15/business/15cnd-auto.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/2007-tahoe.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Last evening, a source privy to the talks between Chrysler and GM, revealed to the New York Times that the General may be sharing its GMT900 SUV platform with the American half of the German-American hybrid.<br /><br />Since Chrysler doesn't have a large SUV in its line-up (the Durango doesn't make the cut), the rumored platform sharing could make a bit of sense - for Chrysler. As for General Motors, the automaker's turnaround plan is in full effect and the only upside we can see is that a little extra cash in the coffers certainly wouldn't do any harm, as long as it doesn't cut into their highly-profitable SUVs.<br /><br />Talks between the two automakers have supposedly gone on for about six months, which leads us to believe that some partnership between the two automakers is forthcoming. Naturally, when the NYT contacted a spokesperson for Chrysler about the leak, the response was "no comment."<br /><br />Ready, set, speculate...<br /><br />[Source: New York Times via <a href="http://jalopnik.com/cars/news/this-is-our-country-this-is-our-chrysler-237210.php">Jalopnik</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/gm-to-give-chrysler-some-gmt900-love/">GM to give Chrysler some GMT900 love?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/15/business/15cnd-auto.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/gm-to-give-chrysler-some-gmt900-love/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/755367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/gm-to-give-chrysler-some-gmt900-love/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>DaimlerChrysler</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>gmt900</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><category>suv</category><category>tahoe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DaimlerChrysler won't share Mercedes platforms]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/daimlerchrysler-wont-share-mercedes-platforms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/daimlerchrysler-wont-share-mercedes-platforms/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/daimlerchrysler-wont-share-mercedes-platforms/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.just-auto.com/article.aspx?id=89892"><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="181" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/12/srtcrossfire.jpg" id="vimage_2" alt="Chrysler Crossfire SRT6" /></a> </p>
<p>Brand-conscious DaimlerChrysler managers in Germany are very vocal about the fact that they're not interested in any platform sharing between the Mercedes brand and the others under the corporate umbrella. "A Mercedes will remain a Mercedes and will not share a platform with anyone," said Dr. Ruediger Grube, Board of Management, DaimlerChrysler Corporate Development. "We will leave that to the others," he added. The concern is that cost-savvy shoppers would eschew the flagship Mercedes brand if they felt they could spend less to get fundamentally the same vehicle with another corporate sibling's badges on it. <br /></p>
<p>Dr. Grube told labor union leaders in Stuttgart that the manufacturer would have to look for opportunities to cut costs in other places, such as small parts that are under the skin and through efficiencies in purchasing and data systems.</p>
<p>[Source: just-auto (Sub req'd)]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/daimlerchrysler-wont-share-mercedes-platforms/">DaimlerChrysler won't share Mercedes platforms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.just-auto.com/article.aspx?id=89892>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/daimlerchrysler-wont-share-mercedes-platforms/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/718119/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/daimlerchrysler-wont-share-mercedes-platforms/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DaimlerChrysler</category><category>DCX</category><category>Merceds Benz</category><category>MercedsBenz</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM plans to axe $1 billion out of mid-size car budget]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-plans-to-axe-1-billion-out-of-the-mid-size-car-budget/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-plans-to-axe-1-billion-out-of-the-mid-size-car-budget/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-plans-to-axe-1-billion-out-of-the-mid-size-car-budget/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/saab/" rel="tag">Saab</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aQKOLAvRP0wU&amp;refer=home"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" id="vimage_1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/malibu.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>General Motors says it will eliminate $1 billion from its spending on mid-size cars by sharing more parts, designs and factories to get 'er done. If this involves a little process called "badge engineering," we urge GM to beware of the inevitable onslaught of negative comments following this post.</p>
<p>Ahem. The platform used for the Chevrolet Malibu, for example, will be shared with Saab convertibles among the plants in North America, Europe and elsewhere. The idea is part of a larger plan to get the General, which lost buku bucks last year (try $10.6 billion), back to profitability as competitors such as Toyota Motor Company suck market share away from them. GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner plans to reduce annualized spending by a total of $9 billion by the end of this year.</p>
<p>[Source: Bloomberg]</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-plans-to-axe-1-billion-out-of-the-mid-size-car-budget/">GM plans to axe $1 billion out of mid-size car budget</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aQKOLAvRP0wU&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-plans-to-axe-1-billion-out-of-the-mid-size-car-budget/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/652462/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-plans-to-axe-1-billion-out-of-the-mid-size-car-budget/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>badge engineering</category><category>BadgeEngineering</category><category>chevy malibu</category><category>ChevyMalibu</category><category>GM</category><category>opel vectra</category><category>OpelVectra</category><category>platform sharing</category><category>PlatformSharing</category><category>saab 9-3</category><category>Saab9-3</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>