<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA investigating claims of stalling on 2006 Toyota Corolla, Matrix]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/nhtsa-investigating-claims-of-stalling-on-2006-toyota-corolla-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/nhtsa-investigating-claims-of-stalling-on-2006-toyota-corolla-m/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/nhtsa-investigating-claims-of-stalling-on-2006-toyota-corolla-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE5B603U20091207"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/2007_10_15_08_corolla_le-630op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
When it rains, it pours. With recalls on the books for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/toyota-recalling-3-8m-vehicles-over-floormats-its-largest-ever/">floor mats</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/toyota-extends-tundra-rust-recall-to-include-2000-03-models-tot/">corrosion problems</a>, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is now investigating reports that Toyota's Corolla and Matrix vehicles may have engines susceptible to stalling. Owners of the 2006 model year <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/model/corolla">Corolla</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/matrix">Matrix</a> vehicles with the questioned 1ZZ-FE engines have described stalling in intersections and on highways, putting drivers at a safety risk while they attempt to restart the engine. There have been no reports of crashes.<br />
<br />
It's important to note that about 397,000 vehicles are covered by the review, and that only 26 complaints have been lodged (that works out to about one in every 15,000 vehicles). Since it is a preliminary investigation, there's no recall until NHTSA investigates and determines that the stalling is caused by a specific design or parts defect. Of course, they may also find the stalling issue is attributed to poor maintenance or bad gas... nobody is pointing fingers. Yet.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE5B603U20091207">Reuters</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/nhtsa-investigating-claims-of-stalling-on-2006-toyota-corolla-m/">NHTSA investigating claims of stalling on 2006 Toyota Corolla, Matrix</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/nhtsa-investigating-claims-of-stalling-on-2006-toyota-corolla-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19268417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/nhtsa-investigating-claims-of-stalling-on-2006-toyota-corolla-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2006 Corolla</category><category>2006 Matrix</category><category>2006Corolla</category><category>2006Matrix</category><category>engine stalling</category><category>EngineStalling</category><category>IZZ-FE</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>nhtsa recall</category><category>NhtsaRecall</category><category>recall investigation</category><category>RecallInvestigation</category><category>stalling</category><category>Toyota Corolla</category><category>Toyota Matrix</category><category>ToyotaCorolla</category><category>ToyotaMatrix</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: Prior driver of loaner Lexus in fatal crash told dealer of floormat issue]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/report-prior-driver-of-loaner-lexus-in-fatal-crash-told-dealer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/report-prior-driver-of-loaner-lexus-in-fatal-crash-told-dealer/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/report-prior-driver-of-loaner-lexus-in-fatal-crash-told-dealer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/image002_opt.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
A few weeks ago, we learned that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nhtsa-releases-new-info-about-crash-that-prompted-toyota-floorma/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ruled</a> that the crash of a loaner Lexus ES350 that killed San Diego police officer Mark Saylor, his wife, 13-year-old daughter and brother in law was not just the result of an improper RX400h floor mat sticking the accelerator wide open it was due to a range of factors. In addition to the car having the wrong mats, the brake "rotors were discolored and heated, had very rough surfaces, had substantial deposits of brake pad material, and showed signs of bright orange oxidation on the cooling fins consistent with endured braking."<br />
<br />
According to the <em>San Diego Union Tribune,</em> it turns out that three days before the crash, Frank Bernard had been given the loaner Lexus and experienced the floor mat sticking the throttle wide open. "[W]hile merging onto Interstate 15 from the Poway Road on-ramp, [Bernard] took his foot off the gas and the car kept accelerating, to 85 mph." Here's where it gets even more tragic:<br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>"Bernard pressed long and hard on the brakes and was able to pull over and slow down. He put the car into neutral, but the engine continued to race at full speed. After several failed attempts at turning off the engine, he realized the floor mat had jammed the gas pedal. He slid his foot under the accelerator, dislodged it and had no further problems, the report says."</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>As stated above, without brake-assist (which would disappear after a few moments due to loss of engine vacuum at wide-open throttle) Bernard was able to stop the car, but the brakes would have been fairly stressed. Bernard returned the car to the dealership, but only told a receptionist about the floor mat incident. For her part, the receptionist at first stated she didn't remember Bernard or his story, but later changed her tune, stating that she told a vehicle specialist about the issue. The vehicle specialist denies ever hearing about it. And the vice president of Bob Baker Lexus El Cajon has no comment. <br />
<br />
The question then becomes if the proper personnel had been alerted to Mr. Bernard's incident, would the ES350 have received new brakes and the correct mats before it was lent to the Saylors? It should also be noted that the ES350 was loaned to two other customers between Bernard and the Saylors without incident. Toyota has <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/25/breaking-toyota-to-recall-3-8m-vehicles-to-reshape-and-replace/">since recalled 3.8 million vehicles</a> to reshape and replace accelerator pedals. <br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/dec/04/report-loaner-car-in-fatal-crash-had-earlier/">San Diego Union Tribune</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/report-prior-driver-of-loaner-lexus-in-fatal-crash-told-dealer/">REPORT: Prior driver of loaner Lexus in fatal crash told dealer of floormat issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/report-prior-driver-of-loaner-lexus-in-fatal-crash-told-dealer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19267365/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/07/report-prior-driver-of-loaner-lexus-in-fatal-crash-told-dealer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Floor Mat Recall</category><category>Floor mats</category><category>FloorMatRecall</category><category>FloorMats</category><category>Lexus</category><category>Lexus ES350</category><category>Lexus Recall</category><category>LexusEs350</category><category>LexusRecall</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>Toyota</category><category>Toyota Floor Mat</category><category>Toyota Floor Mat Recall</category><category>Toyota Recall</category><category>ToyotaFloorMat</category><category>ToyotaFloorMatRecall</category><category>ToyotaRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Lieberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: NHTSA proposing new side airbag standards expected to cost $54 per car]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/03/report-nhtsa-proposing-new-side-airbag-standards-expected-to-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/03/report-nhtsa-proposing-new-side-airbag-standards-expected-to-co/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/03/report-nhtsa-proposing-new-side-airbag-standards-expected-to-co/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20091202/AUTO01/912020326/1148/AUTO01/Stricter-side-air-bag-rules-proposed"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/hummer-side-airbags.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Naturally, safety is a top priority for both automakers and consumers alike. It's also of paramount concern to the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration, which is the government body that sets standards for automobile safety here in the States. According to <em>The</em> <em>Detroit News</em>, NHTSA is currently drafting up new legislation that would make side curtain airbags more robust.<br />
<br />
NHTSA projects that the modified airbags would save some 402 lives and prevent 302 serious injuries per year, with the bulk of those made up of motorists who are not properly wearing their seat belts. The new rules would mandate curtain airbags that cover up more of the window opening and stay inflated longer, helping to ensure that occupants are not ejected during a rollover accident.<br />
<br />
What price safety? Current estimates peg the upgrade at about $54 per vehicle, which equals roughly $920 million annually. Under the proposal, 20 percent of every major manufacturer's fleet would need to comply by 2014 and all vehicles would need to be so-equipped by 2017.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20091202/AUTO01/912020326/1148/AUTO01/Stricter-side-air-bag-rules-proposed">The Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/03/report-nhtsa-proposing-new-side-airbag-standards-expected-to-co/">REPORT: NHTSA proposing new side airbag standards expected to cost $54 per car</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/article/20091202/AUTO01/912020326/1148/AUTO01/Stricter-side-air-bag-rules-proposed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/03/report-nhtsa-proposing-new-side-airbag-standards-expected-to-co/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19262173/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/03/report-nhtsa-proposing-new-side-airbag-standards-expected-to-co/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airbag</category><category>airbags</category><category>curtain airbag</category><category>curtain airbags</category><category>CurtainAirbag</category><category>CurtainAirbags</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa airbag</category><category>NhtsaAirbag</category><category>side curtain airbag</category><category>side curtain airbags</category><category>SideCurtainAirbag</category><category>SideCurtainAirbags</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA opening probe into Ford Freestar/Mercury Monterey transmission defect]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/nhtsa-opening-probe-into-ford-freestar-mercury-monterey-transmis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/nhtsa-opening-probe-into-ford-freestar-mercury-monterey-transmis/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/nhtsa-opening-probe-into-ford-freestar-mercury-monterey-transmis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20091117/ANA02/911179988/1254"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2004_ford_freestar_630.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is investigating hundreds of reports that 2004-2005 Ford Freestar and Mercury Monterey minivans are fitted with defective transmissions that could dangerously fail without warning. Most alarming is that many of the transmissions reportedly fail at highway speeds. In a common complaint, the engine will suddenly surge and then all power is immediately lost. The vehicle is forced to coast powerlessly to a safe spot out of the flow of traffic. Angry owners have flooded message boards to report incidents of transmission failures which leave them stranded and stuck with $3,500 repair bills.<br />
<br />
To date, there have been 654 customer complaints and 2,791 warranty claims. However, according to NHTSA, as many as 205,000 vehicles may be affected. The investigation, expected to take a year, will focus on the torque converter output shaft which drives the wheels. Ford Motor Co. has not yet released an official statement regarding the investigation.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20091117/ANA02/911179988/1254">Automotive News</a>, subs. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/nhtsa-opening-probe-into-ford-freestar-mercury-monterey-transmis/">NHTSA opening probe into Ford Freestar/Mercury Monterey transmission defect</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/nhtsa-opening-probe-into-ford-freestar-mercury-monterey-transmis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19246424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/nhtsa-opening-probe-into-ford-freestar-mercury-monterey-transmis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Defect</category><category>Ford Freestar</category><category>ford minivans</category><category>FordFreestar</category><category>FordMinivans</category><category>Freestar</category><category>Mercury Monterey</category><category>MercuryMonterey</category><category>Monterey</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>Recall</category><category>Torque Converter</category><category>Torque Converter Failure</category><category>TorqueConverter</category><category>TorqueConverterFailure</category><category>Transmission</category><category>Transmission Failure</category><category>Transmission problem</category><category>TransmissionFailure</category><category>TransmissionProblem</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dodge recalling nearly 85k 2007 Nitro models over failing wiper concern]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/dodge-recalling-nearly-85k-2007-nitro-models-over-failing-wiper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/dodge-recalling-nearly-85k-2007-nitro-models-over-failing-wiper/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/dodge-recalling-nearly-85k-2007-nitro-models-over-failing-wiper/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a></p><a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V438&amp;searchtype= quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/nitro_07_recall.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Roughly 85,000 2007 Dodge Nitros are being recalled for a windshield wiper issue. Use of the delay settings could lead to the wiper not working at all in any setting. The recall is expected to begin this month, and dealers will repair the wiper mechanism and software for free. For further information you can read the press release after the jump or contact the NHTSA.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V438&amp;searchtype= quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email ">NHTSA</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/dodge-recalling-nearly-85k-2007-nitro-models-over-failing-wiper/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dodge recalling nearly 85k 2007 Nitro models over failing wiper concern</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/dodge-recalling-nearly-85k-2007-nitro-models-over-failing-wiper/">Dodge recalling nearly 85k 2007 Nitro models over failing wiper concern</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V438&amp;searchtype=%20quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/dodge-recalling-nearly-85k-2007-nitro-models-over-failing-wiper/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19248915/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/24/dodge-recalling-nearly-85k-2007-nitro-models-over-failing-wiper/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007 dodge</category><category>2007 dodge nitro</category><category>2007 nitro</category><category>2007Dodge</category><category>2007DodgeNitro</category><category>2007Nitro</category><category>dodge</category><category>dodge nitro</category><category>DodgeNitro</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nitro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: Toyota forced to submit data on Tundra frame rust to NHTSA]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/23/toyota-reportedly-forced-to-submit-data-on-tundra-frame-rust-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/23/toyota-reportedly-forced-to-submit-data-on-tundra-frame-rust-to/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/23/toyota-reportedly-forced-to-submit-data-on-tundra-frame-rust-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20091120/OEM01/911209992/1290"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/tundra_frame_nhtsa.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) began a preliminary evaluation last month of rusting Tundra frames from the 2000 and 2001 model years. Around 200 complaints had been registered before the NHTSA commenced its investigation, with upwards of seventy more complaints coming in since then.<br />
<br />
As with the rusting Tacoma frames, the Tundra members in question were made by Dana. Importantly, though, the Tundra examination is focused only on "the cross member that supports the spare tire -- not the entire frame." Still, that area has been blamed by consumers for the spare tire coming loose, and for brake system failures due to corrosion at the brake line mounting points.<br />
<br />
Toyota ended up buying back Tacomas or extending warranties to settle the rust issue, but Tundra frames were built at different Dana plants and to different specifications, so the Tundra issue is not assumed to be the same as the Tacoma issue. Toyota had until last week to submit its information on the frames, now the NHTSA will need to decide what to do next.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20091120/OEM01/911209992/1290">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/23/toyota-reportedly-forced-to-submit-data-on-tundra-frame-rust-to/">REPORT: Toyota forced to submit data on Tundra frame rust to NHTSA</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20091120/OEM01/911209992/1290>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/23/toyota-reportedly-forced-to-submit-data-on-tundra-frame-rust-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19248919/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/23/toyota-reportedly-forced-to-submit-data-on-tundra-frame-rust-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2000 toyota tundra</category><category>2000 tundra</category><category>2000ToyotaTundra</category><category>2000Tundra</category><category>2001 toyota tundra</category><category>2001 tundra</category><category>2001ToyotaTundra</category><category>2001Tundra</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>safety</category><category>toyota tundra</category><category>ToyotaTundra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ferrari F355 recalled over fuel system concerns... again]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/22/ferrari-recalls-f355-over-fuel-leak-concerns-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/22/ferrari-recalls-f355-over-fuel-leak-concerns-again/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/22/ferrari-recalls-f355-over-fuel-leak-concerns-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ferrari/" rel="tag">Ferrari</a></p><a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V447000&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=rss"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/pirelli-355.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
We see all sorts of recall notices here at Autoblog. Most of them affect ordinary passenger vehicles, but nearly all of them get cleared up the first time around. So this is a bit of a first: Ferrari North America and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have issued a second recall notice to correct a problem on the F355 that should have been addressed with the initial recall issued 12 years ago.<br />
<br />
The concern apparently centers around the fuel delivery system, which initially prompted a recall back in 1997. The original repair <em>should </em>have corrected the issue, but if the "independent automobile repair facilities" that performed the service on many of the cars didn't properly install the new screw clamps, they could have damaged the fuel hoses, which in turn could cause smoke or even an engine fire. New fuel divider blocks should (hopefully) fix the issue this time around, which affects some 2,356 F355s and F355 F1s manufactured between 1995 and 1999. Full details in <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V447000&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=rss">the recall notice at NHTSA</a>.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V447000&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=rss">NHTSA</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/22/ferrari-recalls-f355-over-fuel-leak-concerns-again/">Ferrari F355 recalled over fuel system concerns... again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V447000&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/22/ferrari-recalls-f355-over-fuel-leak-concerns-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19249532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/22/ferrari-recalls-f355-over-fuel-leak-concerns-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>355</category><category>f355</category><category>ferrari</category><category>ferrari 355</category><category>ferrari f355</category><category>Ferrari355</category><category>FerrariF355</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>recalls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jeep recalling over 161k 2007-2008 Wrangler AT models due to tranny temp. sensor absence]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/jeep-recalling-over-161k-2007-2008-wrangler-at-models-due-to-tra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/jeep-recalling-over-161k-2007-2008-wrangler-at-models-due-to-tra/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/jeep-recalling-over-161k-2007-2008-wrangler-at-models-due-to-tra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/off-road/" rel="tag">Off-Road</a></p><a href="http://www.safercar.gov/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/wrangler_630.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Owners of model year 2007-2008 Jeep Wranglers with automatic transmissions may have to visit their local dealers as Chrysler is recalling 161,450 of the SUVs over potential transmission overheating problems. According to the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA), Wrangler models manufactured between June 2006 and July 2008 with automatic transmissions were not fitted with a transmission fluid temperature warning system. If the AT fluid in the affected vehicles overheats, it may boil over and come in contact with hot engine or exhaust components - possibly leading to a fire.<br />
<br />
To help alert drivers that their Jeep's transmission is overheating, dealers will inspect and install a visual "Hot Oil" message in the instrument cluster accompanied by an audible chime to indicate the elevated fluid temperature. The service will be performed free of charge starting in December. For more information, owners of the affected models may call Chrysler at 1-800-835-1403, NHTSA at 1-888-327-4236, or visit <a href="http://www.safercar.gov/">www.safercar.gov</a>. Full press release after the jump.<br />
<br />
[Source: NHTSA]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/jeep-recalling-over-161k-2007-2008-wrangler-at-models-due-to-tra/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jeep recalling over 161k 2007-2008 Wrangler AT models due to tranny temp. sensor absence</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/jeep-recalling-over-161k-2007-2008-wrangler-at-models-due-to-tra/">Jeep recalling over 161k 2007-2008 Wrangler AT models due to tranny temp. sensor absence</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/jeep-recalling-over-161k-2007-2008-wrangler-at-models-due-to-tra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19245474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/jeep-recalling-over-161k-2007-2008-wrangler-at-models-due-to-tra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007 Jeep Wrangler</category><category>2007JeepWrangler</category><category>2008 Jeep Wrangler</category><category>2008JeepWrangler</category><category>AT fluid</category><category>AtFluid</category><category>fire</category><category>fluid</category><category>Jeep Recall</category><category>Jeep Wrangler Recall</category><category>JeepRecall</category><category>JeepWranglerRecall</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>nhtsa recall</category><category>NhtsaRecall</category><category>overheat</category><category>Recall</category><category>Transmission</category><category>wrangler pickup</category><category>wrangler truck</category><category>WranglerPickup</category><category>WranglerTruck</category><category>WranglerUnlimited</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pole Dance: NHTSA to add new side-impact crash test? [w/VIDEO]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/pole_crash.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>NHTSA side-impact pole test - click above to watch the video</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
Not satisfied with cars that manage crash forces well enough to avoid spilling your drink, and engines that run so clean they'll barely asphyxiate ants, a new crash test is reportedly coming in the works from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Along with the test will come new dummies and new testing equipment, all of which means it's likely to have a big impact on future car designs. The side-impact pole test will simulate side collisions with objects like trees or telephone poles, a type of accident that current side-impact tests don't accurately simulate. <br />
<br />
According to <em>The New York Times</em>, the new test will use a 10-inch round pole that will collide with the car at speeds of up to 20 mph. A 75-degree angle will be used, and the point of impact will be just aft of the A-pillar. Naturally, automakers won't have to pass the test all at once, the standard will be phased in. For 2011, 20 percent of an automaker's fleet will have to meet the standard and by 2014, the pole crash standard will be at 100 percent - all new cars will have to comply. <br />
<br />
It's a change that could potentially change the face of auto design, the same way pedestrian impact standards in Europe have led to some peculiar front sheetmetal. Materials changes may also be employed to meet the regulation, with additional high-strength steel being substituted. The more conventional metals currently used are easier to form, while stronger metals require all sorts of hot pressing and tempering to be put into shape. Manufacturing cost will go up, which means prices will probably also increase, or profit will decrease while prices hold steady. Safe cars are a laudable goal, but how safe is safe enough? <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#continued">Follow the jump</a> to see a video of how Ford's 2010 Mustang GT convertible and coupe models fare, then let us know what you think by leaving a comment. <br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/automobiles/15POLE.html?_r=3&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">The New York Times</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pole Dance: NHTSA to add new side-impact crash test? [w/VIDEO]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/">Pole Dance: NHTSA to add new side-impact crash test? [w/VIDEO]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/automobiles/15POLE.html?_r=3&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19243922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test</category><category>crash test video</category><category>crash test videos</category><category>crash testing</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>CrashTestVideo</category><category>CrashTestVideos</category><category>ford</category><category>ford mustang</category><category>ford mustang crash test</category><category>FordMustang</category><category>FordMustangCrashTest</category><category>mustang</category><category>mustang crash test</category><category>MustangCrashTest</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa standard</category><category>nhtsa video</category><category>NhtsaStandard</category><category>NhtsaVideo</category><category>pole impact crash test</category><category>PoleImpactCrashTest</category><category>video</category><category>videos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: Toyota may offer to fix 4 million accelerator pedals]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/15/toyota-may-offer-to-fix-4-million-accelerator-pedals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/15/toyota-may-offer-to-fix-4-million-accelerator-pedals/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/15/toyota-may-offer-to-fix-4-million-accelerator-pedals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN1449344320091114"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/image002_opt_opt.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
While Toyota maintains its position that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/search/?q=toyota+mats&amp;invocationType=wl-auto&amp;searchsubmit=">recent accelerator issues</a> have only to do with floor mats, the company has reportedly agreed to "make changes to gas pedals in certain U.S. models under an agreement with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration." That means that 3.8 million Toyota products - among which are the Camry, Avalon, Prius, Tacoma, Tundra, and Lexus IS250, IS350, ES350 - will be recalled to address the accelerators.<br />
<br />
With negotiations said to be ongoing between the NHTSA and Toyota, the automaker hasn't said what those changes will be, nor has it stated exactly when the recall will begin. According to <em>Reuters</em>, Toyota has a $5.6 billion slush fund to pay for recalls so the repair costs, while sure to be intergalactic, shouldn't affect earnings. The company can only hope now that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/06/report-toyota-execs-deny-cover-up-after-feds-rebuke-automaker-o/">rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/class-action-suit-filed-against-toyota-over-sudden-acceleration/">current lawsuits</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/10/report-toyota-whistleblower-lawsuit-may-spur-even-more-legal-ac/">other current lawsuits</a>, yet-to-be-filed lawsuits, and the 24-hour news cycle don't do the kind of damage that is much worse than merely financial.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN1449344320091114">Reuters</a>, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/toyota-plans-to-end-us-floor-mat-woes-report-2009-11-14">MarketWatch</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/15/toyota-may-offer-to-fix-4-million-accelerator-pedals/">REPORT: Toyota may offer to fix 4 million accelerator pedals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN1449344320091114>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/15/toyota-may-offer-to-fix-4-million-accelerator-pedals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19240103/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/15/toyota-may-offer-to-fix-4-million-accelerator-pedals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>floor mats</category><category>FloorMats</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota acc</category><category>toyota acceleration</category><category>toyota floor mats</category><category>ToyotaAcc</category><category>ToyotaAcceleration</category><category>ToyotaFloorMats</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA to investigate 3 million 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee over gas tank fires?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/nhtsa-to-investigate-3-million-1993-2004-jeep-grand-cherokee-ove/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/nhtsa-to-investigate-3-million-1993-2004-jeep-grand-cherokee-ove/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/nhtsa-to-investigate-3-million-1993-2004-jeep-grand-cherokee-ove/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091110/CARNEWS/911109993"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/cherokee.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
The position of the plastic fuel tanks in 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokees makes them potential fireballs, argues the Center for Auto Safety. The nonprofit organization says that the fuel tank's location makes the pre-2005 Grand Cherokees prone to catching on fire when involved in an accident. Located behind the rear axle and hanging down below the bumper, shorter vehicles can impact the tank directly, says the Center. The fuel filler neck has also sheared off during some of these incidents, leading to fuel spills and the increased potential for fires. <br />
<br />
The Center is petitioning the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to open an investigation and recall some three million vehicles. Chrysler says the Grand Cherokee will come out of the study having met or exceeded any applicable standards. The organization also notes that NHTSA's files reveal 1993-2004 Jeeps involved in 172 crashes with fires and 254 deaths, while just one post-'05 Cherokee has had a fatal fire incident. The defect petition got underway with NHTSA on November 6, and could take a while, though this isn't the first time the agency has looked at problems with these Jeeps. <br />
<br />
NHTSA's "defect petition" process began earlier this month, but a resolution isn't immediately forthcoming - such investigations can take many months - possibly years.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091110/CARNEWS/911109993">AutoWeek</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/nhtsa-to-investigate-3-million-1993-2004-jeep-grand-cherokee-ove/">NHTSA to investigate 3 million 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee over gas tank fires?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/article/20091110/CARNEWS/911109993>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/nhtsa-to-investigate-3-million-1993-2004-jeep-grand-cherokee-ove/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19234082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/nhtsa-to-investigate-3-million-1993-2004-jeep-grand-cherokee-ove/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Center for Auto Safety</category><category>CenterForAutoSafety</category><category>cherokee nhtsa</category><category>CherokeeNhtsa</category><category>Grand Cherokee</category><category>grand cherokee fire</category><category>grand cherokee investigation</category><category>grand cherokee recall</category><category>GrandCherokee</category><category>GrandCherokeeFire</category><category>GrandCherokeeInvestigation</category><category>GrandCherokeeRecall</category><category>jeep nhtsa</category><category>JeepNhtsa</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>nhtsa jeep</category><category>nhtsa recall</category><category>NhtsaJeep</category><category>NhtsaRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: NHTSA probe opened into Honda airbag recall timing]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-nhtsa-probe-opened-into-honda-airbag-recall-timing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-nhtsa-probe-opened-into-honda-airbag-recall-timing/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-nhtsa-probe-opened-into-honda-airbag-recall-timing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/acura/" rel="tag">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/2001-honda-accord/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2001-honda-accord.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><em><small>2001 Honda Accord - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></em></strong></div>
<br />
Over the last year, Honda has recalled roughly 444,000 vehicles to repair overpressurized airbag inflators in certain 2001-2002 Honda Accord, 2001 Civic and 2002-2003 Acura TL models. According to the automaker, there has been one death and multiple injuries stemming from the defect, which can send small metal fragments through the airbag and onto the vehicle's occupants.<br />
<br />
For whatever reason, the total recall was announced in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/honda-adds-440-000-more-cars-to-airbag-fragment-recall/">two separate increments</a> that were <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/21/2001-honda-accord-and-civic-recalled-due-to-airbags-that-are-eve/">eight months apart</a> - and NHTSA wants to know why. Earlier, Honda had said that the problem was traced back to Takata Corp., which supplied the faulty inflators, and that the supplier had made "incorrect assumptions" about the numbers of parts it had sent to Honda. Says Honda spokesman Chris Martin:<br />
<blockquote>
<div><em>The initial range of recalled vehicles was based on a relatively small sample of problematic airbag deployments...It took some further customer reports of airbag deployments for us to be able to look back and say, these vehicles are not in the lot we identified but have the same problem.</em></div>
</blockquote>Honda denies any wrongdoing and promises to fully cooperate with the NHTSA investigation.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2001-honda-accord/low/">2001 Honda Accord</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2001-honda-accord/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/2001-honda-accord-stock-_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2001-honda-accord/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/2001-honda-accord-stock--(1)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2001-honda-accord/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/2001-honda-accord-stock--(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2001-honda-accord/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/2001-honda-accord-stock--(3)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2001-honda-accord/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/2001-honda-accord-stock--(4)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091106/ANA02/911069988/1274&amp;AssignSessionID=173371748339590">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-nhtsa-probe-opened-into-honda-airbag-recall-timing/">REPORT: NHTSA probe opened into Honda airbag recall timing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091106/ANA02/911069988/1274&amp;AssignSessionID=173371748339590>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-nhtsa-probe-opened-into-honda-airbag-recall-timing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19229492/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-nhtsa-probe-opened-into-honda-airbag-recall-timing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>honda</category><category>honda accord</category><category>honda accord recall</category><category>honda airbag</category><category>honda airbag recall</category><category>honda civic</category><category>honda civic recall</category><category>honda recall</category><category>HondaAccord</category><category>HondaAccordRecall</category><category>HondaAirbag</category><category>HondaAirbagRecall</category><category>HondaCivic</category><category>HondaCivicRecall</category><category>HondaRecall</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa probe</category><category>NhtsaProbe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA study indicates hybrids have higher pedestrian crash rates]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/08/nhtsa-study-indicates-hybrids-have-higher-pedestrian-crash-rates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/08/nhtsa-study-indicates-hybrids-have-higher-pedestrian-crash-rates/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/08/nhtsa-study-indicates-hybrids-have-higher-pedestrian-crash-rates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2009/11/hybrid-vehicles-have-higher-pedestrian-crashes.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/hybrid-badge.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
A recent study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration finds that hybrid vehicles are more likely to be involved in accidents with pedestrians and bicyclists under certain scenarios. According to state-level accident data, 77 of 8,387 hybrid vehicles (that's .9 percent) were involved in crashes with pedestrians and 48 (.6 percent) were found to have been in accidents with bicyclists.<br />
<br />
By way of comparison, 3,578 of 559,703 non-hybrid vehicles (.6 percent) were involved in pedestrian accidents and 1,862 (.3 percent) were involved with bicyclists. Tellingly, the NHTSA data shows that hybrid vehicles are twice as likely as non-hybirds to be involved in pedestrian or bicyclist accidents at low speeds when the internal combustion engine is not running.<br />
<br />
These statistics are not a complete representation of all accidents nationwide, and NHTSA is quick to point out that additional research is necessary before any final conclusions can be made. Still, this is valuable data that "should serve as a guide when designing future HEV pedestrian and bicyclist crash prevention programs."<br />
<br />
[Source: NHTSA - <a href="http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811204.PDF">PDF</a> via <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2009/11/hybrid-vehicles-have-higher-pedestrian-crashes.html">Consumer Reports</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/08/nhtsa-study-indicates-hybrids-have-higher-pedestrian-crash-rates/">NHTSA study indicates hybrids have higher pedestrian crash rates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811204.PDF>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/08/nhtsa-study-indicates-hybrids-have-higher-pedestrian-crash-rates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19227626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/08/nhtsa-study-indicates-hybrids-have-higher-pedestrian-crash-rates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hybrid</category><category>hybrid accidents</category><category>hybrid crashes</category><category>hybrid safety</category><category>HybridAccidents</category><category>HybridCrashes</category><category>hybrids</category><category>HybridSafety</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan recalls 163,000+ 2008-2009 Rogue crossovers over potential steering fault]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/nissan-recalls-163-000-2008-2009-rogue-crossovers-over-potentia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/nissan-recalls-163-000-2008-2009-rogue-crossovers-over-potentia/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/nissan-recalls-163-000-2008-2009-rogue-crossovers-over-potentia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/nissan-rogue-1/#3"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/08rogue210-close-630.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Nissan Rogue - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
On Sunday, we brought you word of a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nissan-recalls-26-000-2009-2010-altima-and-maxima-models-over-s/">Nissan recall affecting 2009-2010 Altima sedans</a>, and today, we bring you word of an even larger safety issue impacting its CUV lineup. The Japanese automaker is recalling 163,659 2008 and 2009 model year Rogue crossovers due to a potentially serious safety issue involving the crossover's steering gear housing cover. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is reporting that a screw could loosen, potentially causing the steering response to be compromised. In a worst-case scenario, the screw could come out completely, and if large steering inputs are made, the pinion shaft could come out, resulting in total loss of steering. <br />
<br />
Affected Rogue owners will be contacted by Nissan to have the repair scheduled at the local Nissan dealer. The dealers will re-tighten the screw and install a cover plate to prevent the screw from loosening in the future. The recall is scheduled to begin in November, but if you're currently experiencing steering issues (or if this sort of thing keeps you up at night) you should stop by the local dealer right away. Hit the jump to read over NHTSA's press release, and if you have any questions, you can call Nissan at 1-800-647-7261.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-rogue-1/low/">Nissan Rogue</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-rogue-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/08redrogue18_crop_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-rogue-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/08rogue210_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-rogue-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/08rogue205_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-rogue-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/08rogue207_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-rogue-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/08rogue204_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V411&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email">NHTSA</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/nissan-recalls-163-000-2008-2009-rogue-crossovers-over-potentia/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan recalls 163,000+ 2008-2009 Rogue crossovers over potential steering fault</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/nissan-recalls-163-000-2008-2009-rogue-crossovers-over-potentia/">Nissan recalls 163,000+ 2008-2009 Rogue crossovers over potential steering fault</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V411&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/nissan-recalls-163-000-2008-2009-rogue-crossovers-over-potentia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19210603/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/nissan-recalls-163-000-2008-2009-rogue-crossovers-over-potentia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 nissan rogue</category><category>2008NissanRogue</category><category>2009 nissan rogue</category><category>2009NissanRogue</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan rogue recall</category><category>NissanRogueRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: NHTSA upgrading investigation into Honda Odyssey brakes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/report-nhtsa-upgrading-investigation-into-honda-odyssey-brakes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/report-nhtsa-upgrading-investigation-into-honda-odyssey-brakes/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/report-nhtsa-upgrading-investigation-into-honda-odyssey-brakes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN239304920091024"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/odyssey_nhtsa_brakes.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has upgraded their preliminary probe into an issue with the Honda Odyssey to an engineering analysis. The agency has received more than 500 complaints about a braking problem, with drivers saying the pedal gets soft or spongy. According to reports on ten crashes that have been submitted, the van in some cases hasn't stopped as it should.<br />
<br />
The years in question are the 2006-2008 Odysseys. The problem being looked at is whether air entering the brake lines is degrading brake performance. Honda says air might enter the lines, but that wouldn't change the operation of the brakes. This is not a recall, merely an analysis, and there is no indication yet that a recall will be necessary. Later model vans are being looked at most closely, and NHTSA should release its findings soon.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN239304920091024">Reuters</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/report-nhtsa-upgrading-investigation-into-honda-odyssey-brakes/">REPORT: NHTSA upgrading investigation into Honda Odyssey brakes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN239304920091024>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/report-nhtsa-upgrading-investigation-into-honda-odyssey-brakes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19208875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/27/report-nhtsa-upgrading-investigation-into-honda-odyssey-brakes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 Honda Odyssey</category><category>2008HondaOdyssey</category><category>honda</category><category>honda odyssey</category><category>HondaOdyssey</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA releases new info about crash that prompted Toyota floormat recall]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nhtsa-releases-new-info-about-crash-that-prompted-toyota-floorma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nhtsa-releases-new-info-about-crash-that-prompted-toyota-floorma/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nhtsa-releases-new-info-about-crash-that-prompted-toyota-floorma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-toyota-crash25-2009oct25,0,2288195.story"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/014_2010_lexus_es_350-6202.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Contrary to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/01/toyota-floormat-recall-gets-explained/">previous reports</a>, the death of a four people and the largest recall in Toyota's history was caused by a compound of errors. The initial buzz/word on the virtual street suggested that it was simply an improperly placed floor mat that doomed CHP officer Mark Saylor and three family members when the Lexus ES350 they were traveling in got jammed open at over 100 MPH before crashing and bursting into flames. But it turns out it was more than just a floor mat.<br />
<br />
First of all, the floor mat in question didn't belong to the ES350 (actually, the ES350 didn't belong to Officer Saylor -- it was a dealer loaner while his car was being worked on). The mats in the ES350 that crashed were from a RX400h. Not only that, they were those thick, all-weather hard rubber mats. Regardless, because the dealer had placed the wrong mats into the wrong car, there was no way to properly mount them. Also, it seems that the pedal design of the ES350 also played a role. The NHTSA discovered that, "Beyond the main pivot, the lever is not hinged and has no means for relieving forces caused by interferences." We think that means it can easily get stuck.<br />
<br />
But that's not all. The NHTSA had also learned from a previous ES350 investigation that, "the Lexus ES braking system loses power-assist when the throttle is fully opened, increasing braking distance fivefold." That's not good. And the brakes had signs of heavy wear and damage, "Rotors were discolored and heated, had very rough surfaces, had substantial deposits of brake pad material, and showed signs of bright orange oxidation on the cooling fins consistent with endured braking." <br />
<br />
Additionally, because the Lexus has push button start, the operator must push the button for three seconds before the engine will shut off. A piece of info obviously and sadly not known by Officer Saylor. The San Diego County Sheriff's office is leading the investigation and has not yet released their final report. We'll keep you posted on that, but as they say in plane crashes, looks like the holes in the swiss cheese all lined up.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-toyota-crash25-2009oct25,0,2288195.story">LA Times</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nhtsa-releases-new-info-about-crash-that-prompted-toyota-floorma/">NHTSA releases new info about crash that prompted Toyota floormat recall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nhtsa-releases-new-info-about-crash-that-prompted-toyota-floorma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19210029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/nhtsa-releases-new-info-about-crash-that-prompted-toyota-floorma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Floor Mats</category><category>FloorMats</category><category>Lexus</category><category>Lexus Floor Mat</category><category>Lexus Floor Mats</category><category>Lexus Recall</category><category>LexusFloorMat</category><category>LexusFloorMats</category><category>LexusRecall</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>Toyota Floor Mat</category><category>toyota floor mat recall</category><category>Toyota Floor Mats</category><category>Toyota Recall</category><category>ToyotaFloorMat</category><category>ToyotaFloorMatRecall</category><category>ToyotaFloorMats</category><category>ToyotaRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Lieberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: Ford widens cruise control recall by 4.5M vehicles - now biggest in company history]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/14/ford-recall-cruise-control-4.5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/14/ford-recall-cruise-control-4.5/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/14/ford-recall-cruise-control-4.5/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20091013/AUTO01/910130395/1148/rss25"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/ford_scds_recall.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
For the past ten years, Ford has been doing a dance with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and consumers over the issue of leaking cruise control switches in certain company vehicles. As of 2008, it had recalled some 9.6 million vehicles to repair a faulty Texas Instruments cruise-control deactivation switch, and now after a NHTSA investigation, the Blue Oval has added 4.5 million more Ford and Mercury vehicles to the recall.<br />
<br />
The latest action covers these vehicles: <br />
<br />
1992-2003 Ford Econoline<br />
2000-2003 Ford Excursion<br />
1995-2002 Ford Explorer<br />
1993-1997, 1999-2003 Ford F-Series Super Duty<br />
1994 Ford F-53 chassis <br />
1995-1997, 2001-2003 Ford Ranger<br />
1995-2003 Ford Windstar<br />
1995-2002 Mercury Mountaineer<br />
<br />
According to NHTSA, the switch can leak and overheat, which can lead to smoking and, in some cases, fire. In fact, <em>The Detroit News</em> notes that the switches have been faulted in more than 550 fires - some of which led to fatalities - many of which have led to lawsuits. A Ford statement declared, "Aside from the Windstar, the additional vehicles addressed in this action have different system parameters and do not pose an unreasonable risk to safety. However, Ford is taking this action on all of these vehicles to address possible ongoing customer lack of confidence in vehicles with the affected switch."<br />
<br />
The recall begins on October 26. Anyone with an affected vehicle can take it to a Ford dealer and have the switch repaired with a fused harness. Owners can get more information <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm">directly from NHTSA</a> by calling the government agency's hotline at <span class="navSub">1-888-327-4236</span>. <em>Thanks to everyone for the tips!</em><br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20091013/AUTO01/910130395/1148/rss25">The Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/14/ford-recall-cruise-control-4.5/">REPORT: Ford widens cruise control recall by 4.5M vehicles - now biggest in company history</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/article/20091013/AUTO01/910130395/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/14/ford-recall-cruise-control-4.5/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19195188/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/14/ford-recall-cruise-control-4.5/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cruise control</category><category>cruise control switch fires</category><category>Cruise Control Windstar Ford</category><category>CruiseControl</category><category>CruiseControlSwitchFires</category><category>CruiseControlWindstarFord</category><category>defect</category><category>minivan</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>Recalls</category><category>safety</category><category>suv</category><category>truck</category><category>tsb</category><category>wagon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kicking the Dead: Pontiac recalls 10k 2009-2010 Vibes over cold-weather braking]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/kicking-the-dead-pontiac-recalls-10k-2009-2010-vibes-over-cold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/kicking-the-dead-pontiac-recalls-10k-2009-2010-vibes-over-cold/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/kicking-the-dead-pontiac-recalls-10k-2009-2010-vibes-over-cold/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/2010-pontiac-vibe/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/2010pontiacvibe008_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2010 Pontiac Vibe GT - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
General Motors is recalling 10,119 units of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/model/vibe">Pontiac Vibe</a> due to cold weather-related brake problems. The vehicles subject to the recall are all fitted with the 1.8-liter four-cylinder powerplant, and were sold or are currently registered in one of about two dozen snow belt states.<br />
<br />
According to the recall campaign, very low ambient temperatures may cause brake vacuum components to freeze. The vehicles will still brake, but stopping distances will be increased, possibly leading to a crash. Dealers have been instructed to modify the brake vacuum line free of charge to correct the problem. While the recall specifically names vehicles originally sold or registered in certain states, the repair campaign will also be applied to vehicles sold in all other states. <br />
<br />
For more information, Vibe owners may contact Pontiac at 1-800-620-7668, visit GM's <a href="http://www.gm.com/gmownercenter/">Owner Center</a>, or call the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration at 1-888-327-4236. Full press release after the jump.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-pontiac-vibe/low/">2010 Pontiac Vibe</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-pontiac-vibe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/2010pontiacvibe000_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-pontiac-vibe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/2010pontiacvibe001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-pontiac-vibe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/2010pontiacvibe002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-pontiac-vibe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/2010pontiacvibe003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-pontiac-vibe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/2010pontiacvibe004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/recallresults.cfm?start=1&amp;SearchType=DrillDown&amp;type=VEHICLE&amp;year=2009&amp;make=PONTIAC&amp;model=VIBE&amp;component_id=0&amp;TYPENUM=1&amp;SUBMIT=Retrieve%20Recalls&amp;prod_id=451786&amp;PrintVersion=YES">NHTSA</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/kicking-the-dead-pontiac-recalls-10k-2009-2010-vibes-over-cold/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kicking the Dead: Pontiac recalls 10k 2009-2010 Vibes over cold-weather braking</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/kicking-the-dead-pontiac-recalls-10k-2009-2010-vibes-over-cold/">Kicking the Dead: Pontiac recalls 10k 2009-2010 Vibes over cold-weather braking</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/kicking-the-dead-pontiac-recalls-10k-2009-2010-vibes-over-cold/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19193598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/kicking-the-dead-pontiac-recalls-10k-2009-2010-vibes-over-cold/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2009 pontiac vibe</category><category>2009PontiacVibe</category><category>2010 Pontiac Vibe</category><category>2010PontiacVibe</category><category>Brake campaign</category><category>Brake failure</category><category>Brake issue</category><category>BrakeCampaign</category><category>BrakeFailure</category><category>BrakeIssue</category><category>campaign</category><category>Cold weather</category><category>ColdWeather</category><category>Freeze</category><category>Frozen</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>pontiac</category><category>pontiac vibe</category><category>PontiacVibe</category><category>recall</category><category>Recall Campaign</category><category>RecallCampaign</category><category>vibe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan may bust a nut under pressure, recalls 143,000 over tire monitoring woe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infiniti/" rel="tag">Infiniti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/2010-nissan-cube-us-model/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/01_cube_press-630-a.jpg" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><em><small>2009 Nissan Cube - click above for hi-res image gallery</small></em></strong></div>
<br />
If you own a 2008-2010 Nissan with Tire Pressure Monitoring and you live in one of the 21 "cold weather" states, your tires could lose an air load in a big hurry. Nissan is recalling 143,000 vehicles equipped with TPMS after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration discovered that the material in the nut may corrode in areas that use high concentrations of road salt. If this happens, the nut could come out of the sensor-transmitter, illuminating the amber TPMS lamp. if the driver ignores this warning, the tire could quickly deflate, possibly resulting in a crash (or at least a ruined trip to the grocery store).<br />
<br />
What models are covered in the recall? The 2009 Nissan Cube and Murano, along with the 2008 Rogue. 2008-2010 Infiniti M35 and M45 sport sedans are also affected by the action. Owners of model affected by the recall will be able to head over to the nearest Nissan or Infiniti dealer to get a "more robust nut." Dealers will be able fix recalled vehicles on or before November 2010. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/">Hit the jump</a> to see if you live in one of the states affected by the recall. <em>Hat tip to Art G.</em><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-nissan-cube-us-model/low/">2010 Nissan Cube (US Model)</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-nissan-cube-us-model/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/11/01_cube_press_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-nissan-cube-us-model/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/11/04_cube_press_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-nissan-cube-us-model/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/11/06_cube_press_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-nissan-cube-us-model/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/11/07_cube_press_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-nissan-cube-us-model/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/11/08_cube_press_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V393&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email">NHTSA</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan may bust a nut under pressure, recalls 143,000 over tire monitoring woe</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/">Nissan may bust a nut under pressure, recalls 143,000 over tire monitoring woe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19190985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/09/nissan-may-bust-a-nut-under-pressure-recalls-143-000-over-tire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2009 nissan cube</category><category>2009NissanCube</category><category>auto recall</category><category>AutoRecall</category><category>car recall</category><category>CarRecall</category><category>Infiniti m35</category><category>infiniti m45</category><category>InfinitiM35</category><category>InfinitiM45</category><category>itre pressure monitoring</category><category>ItrePressureMonitoring</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan cube</category><category>nissan murano</category><category>nissan recall</category><category>nissan rogue</category><category>NissanCube</category><category>NissanMurano</category><category>NissanRecall</category><category>NissanRogue</category><category>recall</category><category>tpms</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota's solution for troublesome floormats: Tie them down]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/08/toyotas-solution-for-troublesome-floormats-tie-them-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/08/toyotas-solution-for-troublesome-floormats-tie-them-down/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/08/toyotas-solution-for-troublesome-floormats-tie-them-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20091007/ANA05/910079988/1078"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/image002_opt.jpg" /></a><br /> <br /> Good news for those of you who happen to own a Toyota or Lexus vehicle sans floormats, as the Japanese automaker has reportedly come up with a solution to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/toyota-recalling-3-8m-vehicles-over-floormats-its-largest-ever/">3.8 million-vehicle recall announced last week</a>. We haven't reviewed the documentation ourselves, but it sounds as if the answer is to zip tie the driver's side floormat to the seat rails.<br /> <br /> Toyota spokesman Brian Lyons tells <em>Automotive News</em> that dealers all around the country should have gotten the instructions on the so-called "semipermanent floormat installation process," which means they can continue to sell new and used vehicles with floormats in place.<br /> <br /> Plus, dealerships are being instructed to attach a note to the nylon wire-tie instructing dealers and customers to ensure the mats are properly affixed. The warning also notes that owners should never stack multiple mats on top of one another(!). Apparently, this bit of discount MacGyvery satisfies the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. If you own <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/toyota-recalling-3-8m-vehicles-over-floormats-its-largest-ever/">one of the recalled models</a>, perhaps it's time to visit your dealership to get the fix taken care of.<br /> <br /> [Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20091007/ANA05/910079988/1078">Automotive News</a> - sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/08/toyotas-solution-for-troublesome-floormats-tie-them-down/">Toyota's solution for troublesome floormats: Tie them down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20091007/ANA05/910079988/1078>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/08/toyotas-solution-for-troublesome-floormats-tie-them-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19188301/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/08/toyotas-solution-for-troublesome-floormats-tie-them-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>floor mat</category><category>floor mat recall</category><category>floor mats</category><category>floormat</category><category>floormat recall</category><category>FloormatRecall</category><category>FloorMats</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota floor mat recall</category><category>toyota floor mats</category><category>toyota floormat</category><category>toyota floormat recall</category><category>toyota recall</category><category>ToyotaFloormat</category><category>ToyotaFloormatRecall</category><category>ToyotaFloorMats</category><category>ToyotaRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>