<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA wants to issue larger fines for safety and recall infractions]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/22/us-autos-safety-idUSBRE82L13020120322?type=companyNews"><img alt="David Strickland Ray LaHood"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/strickland-lahood.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 457px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota">Toyota</a> made all kinds of news during its recall woes, with one headline item being the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/21/report-toyota-agrees-to-extra-32-4m-in-fines-over-recalls/">record-breaking $32.4 million civil penalty</a> it paid to the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>. The charge was levied by NHTSA because it considered Toyota tardy in announcing its recalls, and was almost twice the additionally record-setting $16.4 million fine that Toyota paid to address the recall itself. According to a report in <em>Reuters</em>, though, NHTSA Administrator David Strickland believes that such fines aren't strong enough deterrents for automakers.<br />
<br />
Currently the maximum fine the NHTSA can levy per infraction is $17 million. Due to last year's climate catastrophes, Toyota's profit for its 2011-2012 fiscal year is expected to drop 42 percent from the year before, but this month the company <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/uk-toyota-idUKTRE8160D020120207">issued a projection of &yen;200 billion</a> ($2.5 billion U.S.) for operating profit. Having to pay government fines is never ideal, but Toyota's total fine of $48.4 million, when compared to $2.5 billion, probably made the public stoning far more painful than writing that check.<br />
<br />
Carmakers are said to be doing more, and doing it more quickly, when it comes to investigating and announcing recalls. Still, Strickland wants the maximum civil penalty raised by almost a factor of 15, to $250 million per infraction. The language to do so has been included in a transportation bill approved by the Senate, but a House version omits that provision. Republicans - and automakers - have no interest in seeing it added, but unless he's just rattling the cage to keep the heat up, this probably won't be Strickland's last effort to get a bigger bat.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/">NHTSA wants to issue larger fines for safety and recall infractions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20200507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>david strickland</category><category>fines</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa fines</category><category>toyota fine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20200507/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/20200507/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20200507</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/strickland-lahood_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW agrees to pay $3M fine for late reporting of recalls]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorcycles/" rel="tag">Motorcycle</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120210/AUTO01/202100441/1148/AUTO01/BMW-paying-3M-fine-over-delayed-recalls"><img alt="BMW logo" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/nhtsabmwfines.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 250px; height: 247px; float: right;" /></a><a href="http://autoblog.com/bmw">BMW</a> is handing over $3 million in fines to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over the way it has handled recalls. NHTSA began an investigation of BMW's practices in 2010, looking at 16 recalls that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/10/usa-bmw-fine-idUSL2E8DAF4220120210?type=companyNews&amp;feedType=RSS">covered more than 300,000</a> of the company's cars and motorcycles going back in some cases to 2002.<br />
<br />
In levying the fine, NHTSA found that "BMW appears to maintain a practice, by design or habit, in which it provides little information in its initial (recall) filings." Of the instances which garnered fines, however, BMW said all but one of them concerned its motorcycles, not its cars. The NHTSA said that BMW would eventually provide the information but only after what the NHTSA termed an "<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-10/bmw-fined-3-million-by-u-s-for-delays-in-reporting-defects.html">inordinate amount of time</a>."<br />
<br />
To address the issue, BMW is changing its methods for how it provides information to the government and how it deals with recalls.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/">BMW agrees to pay $3M fine for late reporting of recalls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20169611/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>bmw motorrad</category><category>bmw recall</category><category>fines</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa fine</category><category>nhtsa fines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20169611/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/20169611/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20169611</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/nhtsabmwfines_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA launching probe into timeliness of three Toyota recalls]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><img hspace="0" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/gyi0059486991-630op.jpg" /><br />
<br />
Another day, another major story on <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/toyota">Toyota</a>'s recent recall woes. As you may have already heard, the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration - and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/02/lahood-getting-toyota-to-recall-took-enormous-effort-calls-a/">particularly</a> U.S. Transportation Secretary <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/ray+lahood">Ray LaHood</a> - is less than pleased with the way Toyota has handled its various vehicle callbacks.<br />
<br />
Now, NHTSA has made its public displeasure official with a press release indicating that it will "[use] its statutory authority to obtain documents from Toyota to determine if the automaker conducted three of its recent recalls in a timely manner." To what end? To determine "when and how it learned of the defects affecting approximately 6 million vehicles in the U.S. alone" and to be sure that there aren't any additional problems Toyota has yet to announce.<br />
<br />
If the NHTSA finds that Toyota failed to deal with known safety issues in a timely manner, it could find the Japanese automaker liable for a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/03/nhtsa-mulling-toyota-fines-for-delayed-recall/">maximum of $16.4 million in civil penalties</a>. Granted, that's a pretty small dollar amount for such a large company, but it could spearhead the already rising tide of negative press and keep the issue fresh in the public's mind for some time to come. Click past the break for the official press release.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota_recall/guide"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/ab-recall-banner-sm-1265124357.png" /></a><br />
<em><strong><small>Tired of Toyota recall news? Try out the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/exclude/toyota+recall">recall-free version</a> of Autoblog.</small></strong></em><span class="description"><br />
</span><br />
[Source: NHTSA]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NHTSA launching probe into timeliness of three Toyota recalls</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/">NHTSA launching probe into timeliness of three Toyota recalls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19360486/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>NHTSA</category><category>nhtsa fine</category><category>nhtsa fines</category><category>nhtsa recall</category><category>nhtsa toyota</category><category>NhtsaFine</category><category>NhtsaFines</category><category>NhtsaRecall</category><category>NhtsaToyota</category><category>recall</category><category>Recalls</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota recall</category><category>toyota recall accelerator</category><category>toyota recall fix</category><category>Toyota Recall Throttle</category><category>toyota recalls</category><category>Toyota safety</category><category>toyota safety concealed</category><category>toyota safety concerns</category><category>ToyotaRecall</category><category>ToyotaRecallAccelerator</category><category>ToyotaRecallFix</category><category>ToyotaRecalls</category><category>ToyotaRecallThrottle</category><category>ToyotaSafety</category><category>ToyotaSafetyConcealed</category><category>ToyotaSafetyConcerns</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19360486/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/02/16/nhtsa-launching-probe-into-timeliness-of-three-toyota-recalls/19360486/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19360486</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/gyi0059486991-630op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Mercedes-Benz pays $28.9m in fines for fuel efficiency crimes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/mercedes-benz-pays-28-9m-in-fines-for-fuel-efficiency-crimes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/mercedes-benz-pays-28-9m-in-fines-for-fuel-efficiency-crimes/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/mercedes-benz-pays-28-9m-in-fines-for-fuel-efficiency-crimes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090106/BUSINESS01/90106086/1014/rss13"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/sl65amgblackseries22_580op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />According to the NHTSA, more than $37 million in fines were collected last year for cars sold in 2007 from manufacturers that failed to meet current CAFE standards. Of the six manufacturers that paid fines, Mercedes-Benz was hit the hardest, racking up an astounding $28.9 million bill that was paid in December. That's a huge figure, especially in this troubled automotive market, but it's actually a bit smaller than the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/31/nhtsa-releases-06-cafe-fines-daimler-chrysler-takes-cake/">$30.3 million fine</a> paid by DaimlerChrysler the previous year -- a figure that still holds the record. Go Daimler! <br /><br />Other marques that failed to meet CAFE requirements included Volkswagen, which was hit with a $4.5 million sum, along with Porsche and Maserati, both of which paid fees of $1.2 million and Ferrari, which managed to skate by with a relatively paltry $1.1 million fine. <br /><br />With <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/nhtsa-announces-new-cafe-standards-through-2015/">increasingly strict regulations</a> expected in the near future, these fines don't exactly bode well for the manufacturers of higher-end luxury vehicles, and the fact that the timing for these requirements is <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/bush-declines-to-enact-higher-fuel-economy-standards/">still undecided </a>makes it even tougher to plan for them. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090106/BUSINESS01/90106086/1014/rss13">Detroit Free Press</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/mercedes-benz-pays-28-9m-in-fines-for-fuel-efficiency-crimes/">Mercedes-Benz pays $28.9m in fines for fuel efficiency crimes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/article/20090106/BUSINESS01/90106086/1014/rss13>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/mercedes-benz-pays-28-9m-in-fines-for-fuel-efficiency-crimes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1423386/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/mercedes-benz-pays-28-9m-in-fines-for-fuel-efficiency-crimes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cafe fine</category><category>cafe fines</category><category>CafeFine</category><category>CafeFines</category><category>daimler cafe</category><category>DaimlerCafe</category><category>mercedes-benz</category><category>mercedes-benz cafe</category><category>Mercedes-benzCafe</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa cafe rules</category><category>nhtsa fine</category><category>nhtsa fines</category><category>NhtsaCafeRules</category><category>NhtsaFine</category><category>NhtsaFines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1423386/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/01/08/mercedes-benz-pays-28-9m-in-fines-for-fuel-efficiency-crimes/1423386/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1423386</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/sl65amgblackseries22_580op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
