<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Cadillac to recall 20,000 SRX models over wheels that could fall off]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-cadillac-srx-new-york-2012/"><img alt="2013 Cadillac SRX - front three-quarter view, silver" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-cadillac-srx.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
A potential issue with the lug nuts on 19,871 units of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/srx/">2013 Cadillac SRX</a> in the US and Canada has lead to a recall of the luxury crossover. Those lug nuts that have a Teflon topcoat, identified by their bluish tint, could loosen and cause "creaking, rattling or grinding noises or steering vibrations." In the worst case scenario, a wheel could fall off, but there have been no reports of that happening, nor any reports of accidents or injuries due to the issue. <br />
<br />
This is the second recall action on the SRX over the last few months. In March, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> recalled 27,000 SRX models over a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/">transmission programming issue</a>. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gm/">General Motors</a> will begin notifying customers with the potentially faulty parts on June 3, at which time they can take their vehicles to dealers to have the tires rotated and new nuts installed. A further 7,397 SRXs exported from North America also face the recall action. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/">Cadillac to recall 20,000 SRX models over wheels that could fall off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20580817/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 cadillac srx</category><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac recall</category><category>cadillac srx</category><category>cadillac srx recall</category><category>cadillacsrxrecall</category><category>gm</category><category>lug nut</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>srx recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20580817/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/20580817/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20580817</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-cadillac-srx_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA opens investigation into Ford Super Duty trucks over steering woes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-super-duty/#photo-138363"><img alt="2008 Ford F250 Super Duty - front three-quarter view, red" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-ford-super-duty-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has launched an investigation into certain 2008 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-series+super+duty/">Ford F-250 and F-350 Super Duty</a> pickup trucks. The investigation covers some 340,000 trucks after the government agency received five complaints of steering box failures. Owners claim internal failures resulted in the complete loss of their vehicles' control. In one case, steering box failure is being blamed for an F-Series crashing into another vehicle at around 20 miles per hour, while another another driver said his truck left the road and impacted a guardrail at around 35 mph.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> says it is cooperating with NHTSA in the investigation. We'll keep tabs on the investigation and let you know if a recall results.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/">NHTSA opens investigation into Ford Super Duty trucks over steering woes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 May 2013 11:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20566393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>f-series</category><category>ford f-250</category><category>ford f-350</category><category>ford f-350 super duty</category><category>ford super duty</category><category>investigation</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>steering box</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20566393/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/20566393/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20566393</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-ford-super-duty-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee/#photo-199701"><img alt="2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 400px;" /></a><br />
<br />
 <img class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2010-jeep-commander.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 250px; height: 156px; float: right;" /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> has issued a recall covering a combined 469,000 units of the 2005-2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee </a>and the 2006-2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jeep+commander/">Jeep Commander</a> (inset). Of that number, 295,000 are in the US, roughly 33,000 in Canada and Mexico and the remainder in other markets. It seems an electrical fault in the transfer case can allow the affected SUVs to shift into neutral on their own, while an <em>Associated Press</em> report says that Chrysler had "found cracks in a circuit board that turns the four-wheel-drive system on and off." The issue was discovered when an owner started his car remotely and it rolled away.<br />
<br />
Chrysler is expected to begin notifying owners in June 2013, who can then take their cars to dealers. The dealer will reflash the final drive controller free of charge. There's a bulletin from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> <a href="/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#continued">below</a> with more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/">Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 May 2013 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20565869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jeep</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>jeep commander recall</category><category>jeep commander recalls</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep grand cherokee recalls</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>jeep recalls</category><category>jeepcommanderrecall</category><category>jeepcommanderrecalls</category><category>jeepgrandcherokeerecalls</category><category>jeeprecall</category><category>jeeprecalls</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:45:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20565869/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/20565869/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20565869</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[More drivers than ever are dying on US roads]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/traffic-fatalities-nhtsa-americans-killed-cdc/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005"><img alt="car crash"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/car-crash.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 361px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Our sister site, <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/traffic-fatalities-nhtsa-americans-killed-cdc/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005"><em>AOL Autos</em></a>, reports more people are dying in car accidents in the US than ever before. Fatalities jumped by 5.3 percent last year to 34,080 deaths, according to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>. The increase is due in part to the fact that Americans are also driving more than ever before, covering 0.3-percent more miles in 2012 than 2011. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">NHTSA</a> says that may be due to the fact that modern vehicles offer better fuel efficiency than before, and thus allow drivers to cover greater distances for the same money.<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/motorcycle/">Motorcycle</a> fatalities accounted for 14.7 percent of all traffic deaths, with 5,000 riders dying last year alone. The Governors Highway Association says many of those deaths could have been prevented with proper helmet laws. Right now, 31 states don't require riders to wear helmets. Pedestrian deaths also increased by 4 percent to 4,280, and deaths attributed to distracted driving jumped by 1.92 percent to 3,331 people.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/">More drivers than ever are dying on US roads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 May 2013 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20563944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deaths</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>traffic deaths</category><category>traffic fatalities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20563944/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/20563944/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20563944</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/car-crash_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2005-2007 Corvette investigated for faulty headlamps]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130510/AUTO0103/305100395/1148/auto01/U-S-officials-probe-Corvette-headlamp-problem"><img alt="2007 Chevrolet Corvette" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2007-corvette-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 409px;" /></a><br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130510/AUTO0103/305100395/1148/auto01/U-S-officials-probe-Corvette-headlamp-problem"><em>The Detroit News</em></a> reports the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has opened an investigation into 103,374 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/corvette/">Chevrolet Corvette</a> models built between 2005 and 2007. The administration is currently looking into a headlight issue after receiving 30 complaints from owners saying that the vehicle abruptly lost both low beams. Demonstrating its uncanny affinity for the obvious, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">NHTSA</a> said, "The loss of illumination impairs the driver's ability to see the roadway." Such a condition could lead to a crash.<br />
<br />
Some of the complaints state that the problem is intermittent, while others say the issue only began after driving over an object in the road. Still others say the low beams return after the vehicle has been parked for some time. Both high-beams and fog lights remain functional in every case, however.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/">2005-2007 Corvette investigated for faulty headlamps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 10 May 2013 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20564840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2005 chevy corvette</category><category>2006 chevy corvette</category><category>2007 chevy corvette</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy corvette</category><category>corvette headlights</category><category>investigation</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20564840/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/20564840/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20564840</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2007-corvette-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Airbag recalls on track for record year]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/air-bag-recalls-doubled-on-track-for-record-year/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005"><img height="440"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/airbags.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The escalating complexity of automobiles is led in part by the escalating complexity of safety systems. The once dumb airbag that lived all alone inside the steering wheel, for instance, is now a family of smart airbags that might be able to detect the location of the passenger they're meant to protect and how best to inflate in order to protect him. Beyond the increased sticker price, the cost of that technology is more things going wrong.<br />
<br />
According to a story on <em>AOL Autos</em> there have been 22 recalls in the last six months due to airbags - covering more than 3.8 million cars up to 12 years old - compared to ten in the six months before. 15 of those have come this year, and at the current pace 2013 is on course to surpass the total of 23 airbag-related recalls of 2012. Malfunctions that led to the recalls have included airbags not deploying when expected, or deploying unexpectedly, or causing additional injuries and damage to occupants when they do deploy.<br />
<br />
It can take suppliers, automakers and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> years to address the issue and initiate a recall, even after hundreds of complaints have been filed. On top of that, the increasing concentration of the supplier base and the move to global platforms means that what might once have been a localized issue is now a global one. Some look at the number of airbag recalls as a problem with the technology, feeling "it's not working very well." Others see it as the improved operation of the corrective system - more issues are being recalled because automakers are taking safety concerns more seriously. The "right" answer, if there is one, is no doubt as complex as the technology, so <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/air-bag-recalls-doubled-on-track-for-record-year/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005">click over to <em>AOL Autos</em></a> for the full story and decide for yourself.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/">Airbag recalls on track for record year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 06 May 2013 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20558464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airbag</category><category>airbag recall</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 11:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20558464/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/20558464/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20558464</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/airbags_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-2013-toyota-fj-cruiser/#photo-5738632"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/004-toyota-fj-cruiser.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Now, hold on. This recall isn't quite as serious as it sounds. Yes, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> is recalling 11,489 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/fj+cruiser/">FJ Cruiser</a> models from the 2007 to 2013 model years, and yes, it's because the vehicles, as <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchResults?searchType=ID&amp;targetCategory=R&amp;searchCriteria.nhtsa_ids=13V163000&amp;refurl=rss">the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration states</a>, "fail to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, 'Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.'" But read the fine print and you'll see the catch: This recall is only for vehicles fitted with the automaker's auxiliary lighting kit that can be mounted to the front bumper.<br />
<br />
Basically, the auxiliary lamp assemblies use 55-watt bulbs, and when these are turned on in conjunction with the upper beam headlamps, it's a pretty blinding sight. NHTSA states that excessively bright lights can blind other drivers, increasing the risk for a crash.<br />
<br />
To remedy the situation, Toyota will replace the 55-watt bulbs with cooler 35-watt units. The recall is expected to begin later this month. <a href="/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the full details in the NHTSA report.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/">Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 05 May 2013 11:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20557364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>headlights</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota fj cruiser</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 11:12:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20557364/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/20557364/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20557364</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/004-toyota-fj-cruiser_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA launches investigations into Ford Crown Victoria police cars, Dodge Viper and Porsche 911]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/30/autos-safety-idUSL2N0DH2O420130430"><img alt="​2005 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor - dead-on front view"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2005-ford-crown-victoria-police-interceptor-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 518px; " /></a><br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/30/autos-safety-idUSL2N0DH2O420130430"><em>Reuters</em></a> reports that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is investigating certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/crown victoria/">Ford Crown Victoria</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/911/">Porsche 911</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/viper/">Dodge Viper</a> models for potential defects. NHTSA is currently looking into 2005-2008 Crown Victoria police car models for steering column failures that could cause the upper and lower portions of the steering shaft to separate. Such a condition would lead to a loss of control. So far there are 195,000 vehicles involved with 15 warranty claims.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, 10,000 Porsche 911 sports cars are under investigation for a faulty cooling hose fitting. The loose hose could cause a rapid loss of coolant that could not only damage the engine, but cause a slick road surface that could pose a danger to other traffic. The investigation is only concerned with models equipped with 2001-2007 models. There have been 10 owner complaints of failures, with one owner saying the coolant caused him to loose control and spin the vehicle off of the road.<br />
<br />
Investigators are also looking into certain 2005-2006 Dodge Viper models for a rear suspension knuckle failure. Two owners have filed complaints after crashes, and NHTSA is now looking into 2,500 of the vehicles.<br />
<br />
Note: these probes aren't recalls, but can lead to them if NHTSA or the automakers find sufficient evidence of danger to drivers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/">NHTSA launches investigations into Ford Crown Victoria police cars, Dodge Viper and Porsche 911</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 01 May 2013 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20554541/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dodge viper</category><category>ford</category><category>ford crown victoria</category><category>ford crown victoria police interceptor</category><category>ford police interceptor</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa investigation</category><category>nhtsa probe</category><category>porsche 911</category><category>viper</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20554541/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/20554541/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20554541</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2005-ford-crown-victoria-police-interceptor-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/" rel="tag">Subaru</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-subaru-forester-xt-first-drive/"><img alt="2014 Subaru Forester - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/forester-xt-lead-opt.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 419px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Pedal entrapment and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/unintended+acceleration/">unintended acceleration</a> are hot-button topics these days, so automakers are always staying alert for potential problems. For <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru</a> and its newly introduced <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/forester/">2014 Forester</a>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued a recall due to improperly manufactured floor mats that could become an obstruction for the gas, brake or clutch pedals. The good news, of course, is that even if drivers experience this problem, the 2014 Forester comes standard with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/brake+override/">brake override</a>.<br />
<br />
At issue with the floor mats on 10,137 Forester models built between January and March of this year is that the resin material used on the underside of the mats can curl when exposed to heat. If the leading edge of the driver's mat curls enough, it can come in contact with the pedals making acceleration, braking and shifting more difficult - possibly resulting in a crash. To fix the problem, Subaru is replacing the entire set of floor mats in all of the affected units. The official NHTSA recall notice is posted <a href="/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/">Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20551818/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2014 subaru forester</category><category>forester recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>recall</category><category>subaru</category><category>subaru forester</category><category>subaru recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20551818/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/20551818/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20551818</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/forester-xt-lead-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Anthony Foxx nominated by Obama to be next Transportation Secretary [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a></p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/04/29/president-obama-nominates-anthony-foxx-secretary-transportation"><img alt="Anthony Foxx"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/anthony-foxx.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Anthony Foxx, labeled by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/obama/">President Obama</a> as "one of the most effective mayors Charlotte [North Carolina] has ever seen," has been nominated by the President to be the next Secretary of Transportation. Foxx would take over for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ray+lahood/">Ray LaHood</a>, who announced that he would be <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/29/transportation-secretary-ray-lahood-stepping-down/">stepping down</a> a few months ago.<br />
<br />
President Obama had only positive things to say about Mr. LaHood, who had previously served in Congress as a Republican, calling him "a model for the kind of bipartisan approach to governance I think we need so badly in this town." Foxx had been a Democrat, but said during the nomination speech, "There is no such thing as a Democratic or Republican road, bridge, port, airfield or rail system."<br />
<br />
Scroll down below to see a video from <em>CBS News</em> highlighting Obama's announcement and Foxx's acceptance.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Anthony Foxx nominated by Obama to be next Transportation Secretary [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/">Anthony Foxx nominated by Obama to be next Transportation Secretary [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20552424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anthony foxx</category><category>anthony foxx secretary of transportation</category><category>anthonyfoxxsecretaryoftransportation</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>obama</category><category>obama transportation nominee</category><category>obamatransportationnominee</category><category>ray lahood</category><category>transportation secretary</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20552424/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/20552424/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20552424</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/anthony-foxx_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-nissan-altima-first-drive/#photo-5044351"><img alt="2013 Nissan Altima - front three-quarter view with brick wall" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2013-nissan-altima.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px; " /></a><br />
<br />
A pressure regulator that over- or underinflated spare tires for five days earlier this year has led to a recall of 123,308 units of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/altima/">2013 Nissan Altima</a>. Sedans that were manufactured from March 21-26 are those possibly affected by the temporary tire snafu, the recall for which will begin on May 3.<br />
<br />
Those notified of the issue can take their sedans to their local <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> dealer, who will check the tire pressure and correct it if necessary, but we imagine owners can probably just whip out a tire gauge to check and adjust the inflation for themselves. Should you need it, there's an official notice from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> <a href="/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#continued">below</a> with a few more details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/">Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20550797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 nissan altima</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan altima</category><category>nissan altima recall</category><category>nissan recall</category><category>recall</category><category>spare tire</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20550797/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/20550797/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20550797</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2013-nissan-altima_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Honda recalls 2012-13 Fit Sport models over stability control issue]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-honda-fit-sport/#photo-4370170"><img height="439" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2012-honda-fit-sport.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> is recalling 43,782 examples of the 2012 and 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/fit+sport/">Fit Sport</a> in the US and close to 2,000 more in Canada. During federal compliance testing it was discovered that the software for the Vehicle Stability Assist allows an excessive tilt angle before applying the brakes to prevent a crash. The issue only affects Fit Sports equipped with a certain kind of tire.<br />
<br />
Honda will notify owners in mid-May, at which time owners can take their cars to dealers to have the stability control software updated free of charge. There's a press release from Honda <a href="/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/#continued">below</a> with more details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Honda recalls 2012-13 Fit Sport models over stability control issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/">Honda recalls 2012-13 Fit Sport models over stability control issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20550795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>honda</category><category>honda fit</category><category>honda fit recall</category><category>honda fit sport</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>stability control</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:44:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20550795/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/20550795/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20550795</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2012-honda-fit-sport_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA releases voluntary guidelines to combat distracted driving]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infotainment/" rel="tag">Infotainment</a></p><a href="http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/U.S.+DOT+Releases+Guidelines+to+Minimize+In-Vehicle+Distractions"><img height="430" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/distracted-driving.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
In its continuing battle against distracted driving, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued voluntary guidelines covering the use of in-car infotainment and communication devices. It is NHTSA's intention that the proposals, which have been in the works for a year and are partly based on a 2010 study called "Impact of Hand-Held and Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety Critical Event Risk," will be phased in over the next three years. That would give automakers time to reconfigure their systems to comply.<br />
<br />
Proposed items include disabling manual text entry, video-based entertainment and video phone calls and prohibiting the display of text messages, social media or web pages while the car is in motion or in gear. The objective is to keep the driver's eyes off the road for no more than two seconds at a time, and 12 seconds in total. That 12-second limit would be achieved by only allowing a driver six inputs or touches of the screen within a dozen seconds, but it would include activities beyond phone calls and nav inputs, like changing the radio station or using the climate control. At the moment, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers has a self-imposed limit of 20 seconds, although we're not sure how that's enforced by the infotainment system.<br />
<div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">
</div>
Calling distracted driving "a deadly epidemic," NHTSA says that it is trying to "balance the innovation consumers want with the safety we all need." The study showed that activities like using hand-held phones potentially tripled the risk of a crash and texting doubled the risk of a crash or near-crash. Distracted drivers accounted for about a third of all accident fatalities in 2011, a rise over 2010, but injuries are down, as are the number of crashes related to phone use.<br />
<br />
According to a report in <em>Automotive News</em>, when the proposals are fully implemented, NHTSA is also considering adding them the the New Car Assessment Program, which would encourage automakers to comply if they want a five-star safety rating.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NHTSA releases voluntary guidelines to combat distracted driving</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/">NHTSA releases voluntary guidelines to combat distracted driving</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20548713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance of automobile manufacturers</category><category>distracted driving</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>ray lahood</category><category>texting</category><category>texting while driving</category><category>us dot</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20548713/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/25/nhtsa-voluntary-guidelines-distracted-driving/20548713/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20548713</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/distracted-driving_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[About 20k Nissan Pathfinder, Infiniti JX models recalled for potentially faulty brakes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/" rel="tag">Infiniti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-nissan-pathfinder-first-drive/#photo-5375790"><img height="417"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/13-2013-nissan-pathfinder-fd-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued a recall for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/pathfinder/">2013 Nissan Pathfinder</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/jx/">2013 Infiniti JX</a> due to a problem with the front brakes. The problem is a result of the brake torque member (a part that attaches the brake caliper to the front suspension), which was cast improperly with a structural weakness that could possibly lead to "reduced braking, increasing the risk of a crash," according to NHTSA. How, you ask? If the part breaks, the brake caliper could move position and possibly make contact with the wheel.<br />
<br />
Around 20,000 of these sister crossovers are being recalled, but it doesn't sound like all were equipped with the faulty component. Dealers will inspect vehicles built between December 3, 2012 and January 29, 2013, and replace components from the defective batch. The recall goes into effect next month, but until then, the official recall notice is <a href="/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/#continued">posted below</a> with information for how owners can contact <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>About 20k Nissan Pathfinder, Infiniti JX models recalled for potentially faulty brakes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/">About 20k Nissan Pathfinder, Infiniti JX models recalled for potentially faulty brakes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20545768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 infiniti jx</category><category>2013 nissan pathfinder</category><category>infiniti</category><category>infiniti jx</category><category>infiniti recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan pathfinder</category><category>nissan recall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:17:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20545768/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/20545768/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20545768</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/13-2013-nissan-pathfinder-fd-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Honda recalling 204k CR-V, Odyssey, Acura RDX models over rollaway risk]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/" rel="tag">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-honda-cr-v/"><img alt="2012 Honda CR-V" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/cr-v628opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> has announced a recall over a possible rollaway risk that affects 204,169 crossover and minivan models. The specific vehicles in question are the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/cr-v/">2012-13 Honda CR-V</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/odyssey/">Odyssey</a>, as well as the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/rdx/">2013 Acura RDX</a>.<br />
<br />
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, "the brake-shift interlock blocking mechanism may become slow and allow the gear selector to be moved from the Park position without pressing the brake pedal." In other words, these vehicles could unintentionally roll away.<br />
<br />
NHTSA states that this scenario may only happen during sub-freezing temperatures, but notes that this means the vehicles fail to conform with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 114: Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention. Honda will notify owners of the problem, and dealerships will install an updated interlocking mechanism free of charge.<br />
<br />
The recall is expected to begin on May 13. <a href="/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the full details from the NHTSA report.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Honda recalling 204k CR-V, Odyssey, Acura RDX models over rollaway risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/">Honda recalling 204k CR-V, Odyssey, Acura RDX models over rollaway risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20545757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acura</category><category>acura rdx</category><category>honda</category><category>honda cr-v</category><category>honda odyssey</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20545757/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/20545757/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20545757</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/cr-v628opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler recalling over 200k vehicles across its brands]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram/" rel="tag">Ram</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/04/dodge-challenger-srt8-392.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
With more than 200,000 units across six separate recalls and almost all of its brands, it appears that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> has officially jumped headfirst into the recall pool this month. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued three official recalls for the automaker, and <em>The Detroit News</em> is reporting that the automaker itself has announced three more.<br />
<br />
The biggest of the recalls applies to about 120,000 Dodge <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/charger/">Charger</a>, Dodge <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/challenger/">Challenger</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/300/">Chrysler 300</a> models for 2011 and 2012 due to faulty wiring harnesses for the seat-mounted side airbags, which could lead to these airbags not deploying in the event of a crash. A little more than 60,000 two-wheel-drive versions of the 2007-2008 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/">Dodge</a> Nitro and 2008 Jeep <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Liberty</a> SUVs are being recalled due to a heat shield that could cause the driveshaft to break, which if that isn't bad on its own, could then hit underneath where the airbag sensor is mounted, causing the airbags to deploy. Wrapping up NHTSA's recall notices, about 20,000 Jeep <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/patriot/">Patriot</a> and Jeep <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/compass/">Compass</a> models for 2012 are also being recalled due to a problem with the fuel tank transfer tube that could lead to the vehicle stalling. The LX car recall campaign is going into effect this month, while the other two will start next month - all three notices are posted below.<br />
<br />
In addition to the official NHTSA recalls, <em>The Detroit News</em> is also reporting that Chrysler is recalling more than 16,000 Ram trucks and a small number of Dodge Dart sedans. Around 6,500 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram/1500/">Ram 1500</a> trucks will be recalled due to an improper adjustment of the parking brake cable from the factory, while 7,000 Cummins-powered 2013 Ram Heavy Duty trucks are being recalled due to an engine cover that does not have as much heat resistance as it is supposed to. Finally, a total of 46 Dodge Dart sedans are being recalled due to a problem with the brake calipers and/or parking brake.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler recalling over 200k vehicles across its brands</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/">Chrysler recalling over 200k vehicles across its brands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20536183/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>chrysler 300</category><category>chrysler recall</category><category>dodge</category><category>dodge challenger</category><category>dodge charger</category><category>dodge nitro</category><category>dodge recall</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep compass</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>jeep patriot</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>ram</category><category>ram 1500</category><category>ram heavy duty</category><category>ram recall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20536183/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/20536183/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20536183</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/04/dodge-challenger-srt8-392_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA considering senior citizen crash test ratings for cars]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/nhtsa-considering-senior-citizen-crash-test-ratings-for-cars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/nhtsa-considering-senior-citizen-crash-test-ratings-for-cars/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/nhtsa-considering-senior-citizen-crash-test-ratings-for-cars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130404/OEM11/130409936/u-s-seeks-to-revise-crash-ratings-to-protect-seniors#axzz2PQif6NWm"><img alt="Elderly female driver"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/elderly-female-driver.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 414px;" /></a><br />
<br />
As part of its ongoing effort to make vehicles as safe as possible, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is reportedly looking into creating a new crash-test rating system for cars which includes introducing a "Silver" rating to indicate added safety for senior drivers. <em>Automotive News</em> reports that NHTSA Administrator <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/david+strickland/">David Strickland</a> says the agency is trying to find a way to make cars safer for senior citizens and it's also seeking a way to incorporate crash-prevention technology into its coveted five-star safety rating.<br />
<br />
To protect senior drivers, NHTSA's Silver rating may focus on cars that offer inflatable seat belts or even introduce new technologies that help prevent unintended acceleration as a result of the driver accidently hitting the wrong pedal. Strickland also says existing crash-prevention technologies (such as forward collision warning and lane departure prevention) could work their way into the rating system for new vehicles. This all comes just days after another NHTSA-related report where the agency is apparently trying to come up with ways to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/">fast-track "noncontroversial" rules and regulations</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/nhtsa-considering-senior-citizen-crash-test-ratings-for-cars/">NHTSA considering senior citizen crash test ratings for cars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/nhtsa-considering-senior-citizen-crash-test-ratings-for-cars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20530810/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/nhtsa-considering-senior-citizen-crash-test-ratings-for-cars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test</category><category>crash-prevention technology</category><category>elderly</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>pensioners</category><category>senior citizen</category><category>senior citizens</category><category>senior drivers</category><category>seniors</category><category>unintended acceleration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20530810/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/05/nhtsa-considering-senior-citizen-crash-test-ratings-for-cars/20530810/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20530810</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/elderly-female-driver_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling select Taurus, Explorer and Lincoln MKS models over fuel tanks]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-explorer-sport/#photo-4924163"><img alt="2013 Ford Explorer Sport" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/2013-ford-explorer-sport-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 419px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> is recalling certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/taurus/">2012 Taurus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/explorer/">2013 Explorer</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mks/">2012 Lincoln MKS</a> models over fuel tank concerns. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, vehicles built between July 19, 2011 and March 15, 2012 may have been built with fuel tanks that have a "marginally sealed seam" on the side. Those seams may not provide the strength necessary to protect the tank from rupture during a collision. They may also leak. The recall covers a total of 3,037 vehicles. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">NHTSA</a> says that leaked fuel, in the presence of an ignition source, could easily cause a fire.<br />
<br />
Dealers will inspect the tanks and replace them as need be free of charge. Owners can expect to be notified once the campaign begins on or around April 22, 2013. You can read the full NHTSA <a href="/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/#continued">recall notice below</a> for more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford recalling select Taurus, Explorer and Lincoln MKS models over fuel tanks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/">Ford recalling select Taurus, Explorer and Lincoln MKS models over fuel tanks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20523804/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012 ford taurus</category><category>2012 lincoln mks</category><category>2013 ford explorer</category><category>ford</category><category>ford explorer</category><category>ford taurus</category><category>lincoln</category><category>lincoln mks</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20523804/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/03/31/ford-recalling-select-taurus-explorer-and-lincoln-mks-models-ov/20523804/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20523804</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/2013-ford-explorer-sport-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA looking for power to fast-track 'noncontroversial' auto laws]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130326/AUTO01/303260385/1148/rss25"><img alt="David Strickland" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/strickland-2012.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 245px; height: 317px; float: right;" /></a>When it comes to any new regulation that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> deems "not controversial and therefore unlikely to receive adverse comment," it would like the power to implement the regulation without the standard period of public comment. It seeks the change in order to be able to clear and finalize "routine" rules in a matter of days. If NHTSA is granted the power it seeks, people could still comment on such regulations and request changes, but the agency could ignore the feedback and the requests.<br />
<br />
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers has questioned the proposal, which would expedite the "direct final rule" process, citing the decrease in transparency it could entail and the ambiguous definition of "controversy" - what NHTSA thinks is a routine regulation, others could consider anything but.<br />
<br />
The notice was posted on the NHTSA site on Tuesday, but NHTSA hasn't commented on the proposal, it's chief saying he would let it speak for itself.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/">NHTSA looking for power to fast-track 'noncontroversial' auto laws</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20523352/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers</category><category>david strickland</category><category>direct final rule</category><category>government</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>regulation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20523352/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/03/31/nhtsa-looking-for-power-to-fast-track-noncontroversial-auto-la/20523352/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20523352</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/strickland-2012_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan adds 2013 Titan to gearshift recall]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-nissan-titan-0/"><img alt="2013 Nissan Titan" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/2013-nissan-titan-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 419px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> has added the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/titan/">2013 Titan</a> to the list of vehicles recalled over potential gearshift issues. Just a few days ago, the automaker <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/26/nissan-recalls-nearly-20-000-nv-vans-over-gearshift-issue/">recalled nearly 20,000 NV Vans</a> for a problem with the shift lever assembly that could cause the gear selector to read inaccurately. Now Nissan is recalling certain 2013 Titan pickup trucks manufactured between December 17, 2012 and February 20, 2013 and equipped with column-mounted shift levers, though for a different fault. The pickups were built using certain chemicals that could cause the brake-shift interlock mechanism to fail over time. If that happens, the truck could be shifted out of Park without the driver's foot on the brake.<br />
<br />
As a result, the truck could roll away and cause an accident or injury. Nissan says it will remedy the fault free of charge. Owners can expect to be notified once the campaign begins on or around April 8. You can read the full <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> notice <a href="/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/#continued">below</a> for more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan adds 2013 Titan to gearshift recall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/">Nissan adds 2013 Titan to gearshift recall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20518604/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 nissan titan</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan titan</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20518604/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/03/30/nissan-adds-2013-titan-to-gearshift-recall/20518604/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20518604</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/2013-nissan-titan-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>