<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler resolves recall issue with NHTSA, will inspect, upgrade affected Jeeps]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#continued"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2005-jeep-liberty.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> made big news earlier in the month by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">refusing a recall request</a> from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> for the 1993-2004 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee</a> and 2002-2007 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Jeep Liberty</a>. Last week, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/">NHTSA boss David Strickland countered</a> by defending his agency's request for the recall of 2.7 million <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeep</a> SUVs. Today marked the deadline for Chrysler to formally respond to NHTSA, and it seems that both parties have met in the middle with Chrysler inspecting and upgrading some of the affected vehicles without using the word "recall," which would constitute the admission of a defect; instead, Chrysler said that it is conducting a "voluntary campaign."<br />
<br />
At issue on these vehicles is the positioning of the fuel tank behind the rear axle that could get damaged during a rear-end collision. NHTSA has stated that at least 51 people have been killed in rear-end collisions involving these Jeeps after the vehicles caught fire, to which Chrysler countered by pointing out that both models "met and exceeded" the requirements for fuel-system integrity.<br />
<br />
As a compromise on the situation, Chrysler says that it will inspect all pre-2004 Grand Cherokees and pre-2007 Liberty models and, "if necessary, provide an upgrade to the rear structure of the vehicle." According to <em>Automotive News</em>, this upgrade will consist of adding a trailer hitch that will presumably better protect the rear-mounted gas tank. Vehicles already equipped with a factory or <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/mopar/">Mopar</a> hitch will not be modified. Chrysler's official statement on the matter is <a href="/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#continued">posted below</a>, but no additional information has been released, such as when the campaign will begin and how many vehicles could be affected.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler resolves recall issue with NHTSA, will inspect, upgrade affected Jeeps</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/">Chrysler resolves recall issue with NHTSA, will inspect, upgrade affected Jeeps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20626565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jeep</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:25:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20626565/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/20626565/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20626565</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2005-jeep-liberty_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Bob Lutz, UAW rep commend Chrysler for not bowing to NHTSA recall pressure [w/poll]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a></p><img alt="Auto exec Bob Lutz interviewed by reporters" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/bob-lutz-interview.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/bob+lutz/">Bob Lutz</a>, the well-known executive with a range of automakers including both <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/general+motors/">General Motors</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a>, says he supports Chrysler for not caving under <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">federal pressure to issue a recall</a> on 2.7 million <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeep</a> vehicles. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is arguing that the plastic fuel tanks positioned behind the axles of certain 1993-2004 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/grand+cherokee/">Grand Cherokee</a> models and 2002-2007 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Liberty</a> models may become punctured in a collision and potentially catch fire, so it has called upon Chrysler to recall the vehicles. 15 deaths and 46 injuries have been attributed to the issue. For its part, Chrysler has maintained that its models "met and exceeded" all safety applicable mandates when they were manufactured, and furthermore, they argue that the government agency's own data proves that the vehicles are no more dangerous than similar SUVs produced by other automakers at the time. As a result, it is taking the unusual step of refusing to recall the vehicles.<br />
<br />
According to <em><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130608/AUTO0101/306070047/1148/rss25">The Detroit News</a>,</em> Lutz says Chrysler is right to push back when the government is out of line. Lutz also said that he wished he could have done the same when NHTSA urged Chrysler to issue a recall on certain minivans back when he was with the automaker 25 years ago.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/united+auto+workers/">United Auto Workers</a> Vice President General Holiefield also defended Chrysler by saying, "Our legendary Jeeps are crafted with pride by our dedicated UAW American workforce who work tirelessly to ensure the utmost quality of each Jeep that is produced for customers."<br />
<br />
Who do you think is in the right, Chrysler or NHTSA? Vote in our poll below, then have your say in Comments.<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/#poll82902">View Poll</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/">Bob Lutz, UAW rep commend Chrysler for not bowing to NHTSA recall pressure [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20605515/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bob lutz</category><category>chrysler</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>uaw</category><category>united auto workers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20605515/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/20605515/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20605515</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/bob-lutz-interview_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA investigating 550k Pontiac G6 models, 320k Honda Odysseys]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/nhtsa-investigating-550k-pontiac-g6-models-320k-honda-odysseys/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/nhtsa-investigating-550k-pontiac-g6-models-320k-honda-odysseys/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/nhtsa-investigating-550k-pontiac-g6-models-320k-honda-odysseys/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2005-pontiac-g6/"><img alt="Pontiac G6 - front three-quarter view, blue-gray" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/g6628opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2003-honda-odyssey/"><img alt="2003 Honda Odyssey - front three-quarter view" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/001-2003-honda-odyssey250opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 250px; height: 163px; float: right;" /></a>According to two separate reports in <em>The Detroit News</em>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration </a>is launching investigations into 550,000 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/pontiac+g6/">Pontiac G6</a> (pictured above) and 320,000 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/odyssey/">Honda Odyssey</a> (pictured right) models. The G6 models are all from the 2005 to 2007 model years, while the Odyssey minivans are from the 2003 and 2004 model years. The two NHTSA probes are not related.<br />
<br />
In the case of the G6, this is an upgrade to an original investigation that started in February after NHTSA received "hundreds of reports" that the brake lights on these cars may malfunction. According to <em>The Detroit News</em>, the lights may come on when the brake pedal is not depressed, and likewise, the brake lights may not illuminate when the pedal has been pushed. General Motors was able to provide NHTSA with a significant number of warranty claims, including 1,100 reports that could potentially relate to this problem, one of which indicates a vehicle crash.<br />
<br />
For <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a>, the NHTSA probe concerns airbags that may deploy unexpectedly. The government agency received six complaints from 2003-04 Odyssey owners saying that the front airbags suddenly went off without a crash. <em>The Detroit News</em> reports that three of the six owners sustained injuries from these incidents. Additionally, NHTSA has received 41 complaints from owners saying the vehicle's airbag warning light had illuminated.<br />
<br />
Both of these vehicles may face recalls pending the outcome of these investigations. You can read the full G6 report <a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130610/AUTO0103/306100032/1148/rss25">here</a>, and the Odyssey report <a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130610/AUTO0104/306100037/1148/rss25">here</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/nhtsa-investigating-550k-pontiac-g6-models-320k-honda-odysseys/">NHTSA investigating 550k Pontiac G6 models, 320k Honda Odysseys</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/nhtsa-investigating-550k-pontiac-g6-models-320k-honda-odysseys/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20605539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/nhtsa-investigating-550k-pontiac-g6-models-320k-honda-odysseys/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>honda</category><category>honda odyssey</category><category>honda odyssey investigation</category><category>hondaodysseyinvestigation</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>pontiac</category><category>pontiac g6</category><category>pontiac g6 investigation</category><category>pontiacg6investigation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20605539/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/10/nhtsa-investigating-550k-pontiac-g6-models-320k-honda-odysseys/20605539/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20605539</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/g6628opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler recalling 630k Jeep models worldwide]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-jeep-compass-review"><img alt="Jeep Compass - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/01-2011-jeep-compass-review.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Despite its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/">refusal to recall</a> 2.7 million <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Liberty</a> models this week over a gas tank fire risk, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> will be recalling 630,000 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/compass/">Jeep Compass</a> (pictured), <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/patriot/">Patriot</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/wrangler/">Wrangler</a> vehicles around the globe for a pair of entirely different reasons.<br />
<br />
The affected Compass and Patriot models are all from the 2010 to 2012 model years - 254,000 in the United States, 45,400 in Canada and 109,000 elsewhere in the world. In these models, a software error may result in the late deployment of the side airbags and seatbelt tensioners. In the event of a crash, failure of these systems could result in more serious injuries for the vehicle's occupants.<br />
<br />
Jeep's go-anywhere Wrangler also faces a separate recall due to power steering fluid lines that can possibly wear a hole in the transmission oil cooler line. According to Chrysler, the vehicles could then leak fluid, possibly damaging the transmissions. Roughly 221,100 Wrangler models are being recalled because of this issue, all of which are fitted with Jeep's 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 engine. In the US, 181,000 vehicles are affected, with an additional 18,400 in Canada and 21,700 additional units worldwide. A Chrysler spokesperson said that no crashes or injuries have been reported with either case, according to the <em>Associated Press</em>.<br />
<br />
Both recalls campaigns are expected to begin in July, where dealers will fix these problems free of charge. <a href="/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/#continued">Scroll down</a> to read the official <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> notice on the Compass and Patriot recall, and head over to <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/chrysler-recall-630-000-suvs-worldwide/?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter"><em>AOL Autos</em></a> for the full AP report.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler recalling 630k Jeep models worldwide</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/">Chrysler recalling 630k Jeep models worldwide</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20602261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep compass</category><category>jeep patriot</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>jeep safety</category><category>jeep wrangler</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20602261/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/06/chrysler-recalling-630k-jeep-models-worldwide/20602261/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20602261</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/01-2011-jeep-compass-review_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2013 Buick Encore nets strong IIHS, NHTSA safety scores]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-buick-encore-first-drive/"><img alt="2013 Buick Encore - front three-quarter view, white" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/01-2013-buick-encore-fd-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
After being crushed from every which way and rolled over like a labrador, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/encore/">2013 Buick Encore</a> has been named a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/top+safety+pick/">Top Safety Pick</a> by the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/iihs/">Insurance Institute for Highway Safety</a>. To earn the accolade, a vehicle must achieve the highest rating of "Good" in each of the institute's four main crash tests: Front Moderate Overlap, Side, Rollover and Rear. The Encore aced those four tests with "Good" ratings, but missed out on the coveted Top Safety Pick+ designation by receiving a Poor rating in the institute's new Front Small Overlap test. To be named a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/14/iihs-launching-first-new-frontal-crash-test-since-1995-w-video/">Top Safety Pick+</a>, the Encore would need to score at least an "Acceptable" rating in the new test, as well as "Good" in all four original crash tests.<br />
<br />
Despite the miss, the Encore joins the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/enclave/">Enclave</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/lacrosse/">LaCrosse</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/verano/">Verano</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/regal/">Regal</a> as Top Safety Picks all. If you count only the Encore with all-wheel drive, then all five Buicks have also earned five-star overall ratings from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Adminstration</a>, making <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/">Buick</a> one of the few manufacturers to offer a full lineup with high scores from both safety rating organizations.<br />
<br />
The front-wheel-drive Encore, despite performing equally as well as the all-wheel-drive version in NHTSA's crash tests, only earned four stars overall. As far as we can tell, the discrepancy between the two is because some safety equipment, like Forward Collision Warning and Lane Departure Assist, are optional features on the FWD Encore and standard on the AWD model.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2013 Buick Encore nets strong IIHS, NHTSA safety scores</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/">2013 Buick Encore nets strong IIHS, NHTSA safety scores</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20600276/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 buick encore</category><category>buick</category><category>buick encore</category><category>crash test</category><category>five-star</category><category>five-star rating</category><category>iihs</category><category>insurance institute for highway safety</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>top safety pick</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20600276/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/05/2013-buick-encore-nets-strong-iihs-nhtsa-safety-scores/20600276/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20600276</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/01-2013-buick-encore-fd-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler taking big risk snubbing NHTSA]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><em><big>Maker Insists Feds Overstate Risk Of Fires With Grand Cherokee, Liberty Models</big></em><br />
<br />
<img alt="Jeep logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/34-2012-jeep-wrangler-sport-review.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px; " /><br />
<br />
It's not often that recall stories make it above the fold, in that old newspaper parlance, but when one shows up as the lead story on the network evening news programs, you know it's something big.<br />
<br />
And so it is with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">snubbing its nose</a> at a request by the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/national+highway+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> to recall 2.7 million <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeeps</a> the feds insist are at risk of potentially catastrophic fuel tank fires in a rear-end collision.<br />
<br />
For its part, the automaker insists that "the vehicles are safe and not defective," adding that "incidents... occur less than once for every million years of vehicle operations." And it insists it has the data to back that up.<br />
<br />
But sometimes you can't win for losing and even if Chrysler is right, there is a serious chance that it may nonetheless lose the battle in the public eye, especially if it is seen as putting profits before safety.<br />
<br />
 
<hr style="width: 628px !important;" />
<div style="text-align: right;"><em><img alt="Paul Eisenstein" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/eisenstein-driving-thumb.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 0px 6px; float: right;" /></em><em>Paul A. Eisenstein is Publisher of </em><a href="http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/">TheDetroitBureau.com</a><em> and a 30-year veteran of the automotive beat. His editorials bring his unique perspective and deep understanding of the auto world to </em>Autoblog<em> readers on a regular basis. This story was reprinted with permission from the author and </em><a href="http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/2013/06/opinion-chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/">TheDetroitBureau.com</a><em>.</em></div>
<br />
 
<hr style="width: 628px !important;" /><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler taking big risk snubbing NHTSA</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/">Chrysler taking big risk snubbing NHTSA</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20600422/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>featured</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>paul eisenstein</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Eisenstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20600422/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/05/chrysler-taking-big-risk-snubbing-nhtsa/20600422/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20600422</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/34-2012-jeep-wrangler-sport-review_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler defies NHTSA, says it won't recall 2.7M Jeep Grand Cherokee, Liberty models]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-jeep-grand-cherokee-srt-first-drive/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/jeep-logo.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Facing a possible recall totaling around 2.7 million of its most popular SUVs, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> remains insistent that the 1993-2004 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee</a> and 2002-2007 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Jeep Liberty</a> are safe vehicles. This comes on the heels of a recall request from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> for these two models due to fuel tanks mounted behind the rear axle, which could possibly be ruptured during severe rear-end collisions, leading to an increased risk of fire. In response to the allegations, Chrysler says that it does not agree with NHTSA nor does it plan on recalling either vehicle.<br />
<br />
Chrysler said both SUVs "met and exceeded" the requirements for fuel-system integrity, and cooperated fully with NHTSA since the investigation was opened in 2010. While <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/14/nhtsa-now-probing-over-5m-jeep-models-over-fuel-tanks/">15 deaths and 46 injuries</a> have been reported from fires caused by rear-end collisions on these models, Chrysler is claiming that the vast majority of incidents cited by NHTSA were "high-energy crashes," including one where a stopped Grand Cherokee was rear-ended by a tractor trailer going 65 miles per hour.<br />
<br />
The automaker wraps up by saying "NHTSA seems to be holding Chrysler Group to a new standard for fuel tank integrity that does not exist now and did not exist when the Jeep vehicles were manufactured." <a href="/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/#continued">Scroll down</a> for Chrysler's official response to NHTSA, but we're pretty sure this isn't the last we've heard on this issue.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler defies NHTSA, says it won't recall 2.7M Jeep Grand Cherokee, Liberty models</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">Chrysler defies NHTSA, says it won't recall 2.7M Jeep Grand Cherokee, Liberty models</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20598991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>crash safety</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep fire</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20598991/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/20598991/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20598991</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/jeep-logo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA launching autonomous car study, guidelines]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/30/nhtsa-launching-autonomous-car-study-guidelines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/30/nhtsa-launching-autonomous-car-study-guidelines/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/30/nhtsa-launching-autonomous-car-study-guidelines/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2013/05/30/nhtsa-google-self-driving-cars/2372113/"><img alt="Google's self-driving Toyota Prius in city traffic"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/google-autonomous-prius.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 418px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has decided it's time to step back into the regulatory driver's seat, this time to outline the way forward for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/autonomous/">autonomous vehicles</a>. Cars with partial self-driving capability are expected to arrive by 2020, and it's said that vehicles that can shuttle you around with any driver inputs should be here by 2025. In the interest of keeping everyone safe and ushering in a coherent state-by-state framework, NHTSA is planning a four-year initial research program that look at all the ways in which autonomous and partially autonomous technologies can have an impact on safety. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2013/05/30/nhtsa-google-self-driving-cars/2372113/">According to <em>USA Today</em></a>, NHTSA is recommending that states authorize "operation of self-driving vehicles, for test purposes," something that isn't even a given across all 50 states yet.<br />
<br />
In addition, NHTSA is interested in peripheral active safety features, including safety monitors that help cars stay in their lanes or brake assist systems that slow cars automatically in the case of an imminent collision, and it will be looking at whether these kinds of driving aids should be mandatory.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/30/nhtsa-launching-autonomous-car-study-guidelines/">NHTSA launching autonomous car study, guidelines</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 30 May 2013 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/30/nhtsa-launching-autonomous-car-study-guidelines/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20589347/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/30/nhtsa-launching-autonomous-car-study-guidelines/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autonomous</category><category>autonomous vehicles</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>self-driving car</category><category>self-driving cars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 14:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20589347/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/30/nhtsa-launching-autonomous-car-study-guidelines/20589347/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20589347</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/google-autonomous-prius_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford F-150 EcoBoost in NHTSA probe for acceleration issue]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/28/ford-f-150-ecoboost-in-nhtsa-probe-for-acceleration-issue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/28/ford-f-150-ecoboost-in-nhtsa-probe-for-acceleration-issue/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/28/ford-f-150-ecoboost-in-nhtsa-probe-for-acceleration-issue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-f-150-limited-0/"><img alt="2013 Ford F-150 - front three-quarter view, white" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-ford-f-150-limited-quick-spin---01.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130526/OEM11/130529919/ford-f-150-trucks-being-probed-by-nhtsa-for-possible-acceleration">According to <em>Automotive News</em></a>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is launching a probe into 400,000 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150/">Ford F-150</a> models over possible acceleration problems. According to the article, NHTSA has received 95 reports "alleging incidents of reduced engine power during hard accelerations" on 2011 to 2013 F-150 models equipped with the company's 3.5-liter <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">EcoBoost</a> V6 engine.<br />
<br />
<em>Automotive News</em> reports that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> has issued three technical service bulletins "related to intermittent stumble/misfire on acceleration from highway cruise in humid or damp conditions," according to the government agency's documents. About one third of the 95 reports NHTSA has received cited humid or rainy conditions when these problems allegedly occurred.<br />
<br />
These technical service bulletins have allowed dealers to address a "condition related to moisture accumulation in the charge air cooler during extended highway cruising at constant throttle in humid or damp conditions," AN reports, citing NHTSA documents. Furthermore, the TSB outlines details for "reprogramming the powertrain control module with the latest calibration and installing a new CAC and air deflector plate."<br />
<br />
A Ford spokesperson told <em>Automotive News</em> that the company "will cooperate with the NHTSA investigation, as we always do."<br />
<br />
Ford was <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/16/ford-sued-over-alleged-3-5-liter-ecoboost-defects/">recently involved</a> in a bit of lawsuit trouble regarding its 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6, where plaintiffs in Ohio claimed that the engine "contained serious latent design, manufacturing, or assembly defects." One of those alleged defects was that the engine could lose power quickly, which could certainly be related to this NHTSA probe.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/28/ford-f-150-ecoboost-in-nhtsa-probe-for-acceleration-issue/">Ford F-150 EcoBoost in NHTSA probe for acceleration issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 28 May 2013 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/28/ford-f-150-ecoboost-in-nhtsa-probe-for-acceleration-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20585518/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/28/ford-f-150-ecoboost-in-nhtsa-probe-for-acceleration-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ecoboost</category><category>ford</category><category>ford f-150</category><category>ford f-150 ecoboost</category><category>ford f-series</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20585518/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/28/ford-f-150-ecoboost-in-nhtsa-probe-for-acceleration-issue/20585518/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20585518</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-ford-f-150-limited-quick-spin---01_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Cadillac to recall 20,000 SRX models over wheels that could fall off]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-cadillac-srx-new-york-2012/"><img alt="2013 Cadillac SRX - front three-quarter view, silver" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-cadillac-srx.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
A potential issue with the lug nuts on 19,871 units of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/srx/">2013 Cadillac SRX</a> in the US and Canada has lead to a recall of the luxury crossover. Those lug nuts that have a Teflon topcoat, identified by their bluish tint, could loosen and cause "creaking, rattling or grinding noises or steering vibrations." In the worst case scenario, a wheel could fall off, but there have been no reports of that happening, nor any reports of accidents or injuries due to the issue. <br />
<br />
This is the second recall action on the SRX over the last few months. In March, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> recalled 27,000 SRX models over a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/">transmission programming issue</a>. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gm/">General Motors</a> will begin notifying customers with the potentially faulty parts on June 3, at which time they can take their vehicles to dealers to have the tires rotated and new nuts installed. A further 7,397 SRXs exported from North America also face the recall action. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/">Cadillac to recall 20,000 SRX models over wheels that could fall off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20580817/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 cadillac srx</category><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac recall</category><category>cadillac srx</category><category>cadillac srx recall</category><category>cadillacsrxrecall</category><category>gm</category><category>lug nut</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>srx recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20580817/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/20580817/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20580817</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-cadillac-srx_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA opens investigation into Ford Super Duty trucks over steering woes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-super-duty/#photo-138363"><img alt="2008 Ford F250 Super Duty - front three-quarter view, red" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-ford-super-duty-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has launched an investigation into certain 2008 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-series+super+duty/">Ford F-250 and F-350 Super Duty</a> pickup trucks. The investigation covers some 340,000 trucks after the government agency received five complaints of steering box failures. Owners claim internal failures resulted in the complete loss of their vehicles' control. In one case, steering box failure is being blamed for an F-Series crashing into another vehicle at around 20 miles per hour, while another another driver said his truck left the road and impacted a guardrail at around 35 mph.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> says it is cooperating with NHTSA in the investigation. We'll keep tabs on the investigation and let you know if a recall results.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/">NHTSA opens investigation into Ford Super Duty trucks over steering woes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 May 2013 11:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20566393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>f-series</category><category>ford f-250</category><category>ford f-350</category><category>ford f-350 super duty</category><category>ford super duty</category><category>investigation</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>steering box</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20566393/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/13/nhtsa-opens-investigation-into-ford-super-duty-trucks-over-steer/20566393/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20566393</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-ford-super-duty-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee/#photo-199701"><img alt="2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 400px;" /></a><br />
<br />
 <img class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2010-jeep-commander.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 250px; height: 156px; float: right;" /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> has issued a recall covering a combined 469,000 units of the 2005-2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee </a>and the 2006-2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jeep+commander/">Jeep Commander</a> (inset). Of that number, 295,000 are in the US, roughly 33,000 in Canada and Mexico and the remainder in other markets. It seems an electrical fault in the transfer case can allow the affected SUVs to shift into neutral on their own, while an <em>Associated Press</em> report says that Chrysler had "found cracks in a circuit board that turns the four-wheel-drive system on and off." The issue was discovered when an owner started his car remotely and it rolled away.<br />
<br />
Chrysler is expected to begin notifying owners in June 2013, who can then take their cars to dealers. The dealer will reflash the final drive controller free of charge. There's a bulletin from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> <a href="/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#continued">below</a> with more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/">Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 May 2013 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20565869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jeep</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>jeep commander recall</category><category>jeep commander recalls</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep grand cherokee recalls</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>jeep recalls</category><category>jeepcommanderrecall</category><category>jeepcommanderrecalls</category><category>jeepgrandcherokeerecalls</category><category>jeeprecall</category><category>jeeprecalls</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:45:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20565869/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/20565869/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20565869</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[More drivers than ever are dying on US roads]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/traffic-fatalities-nhtsa-americans-killed-cdc/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005"><img alt="car crash"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/car-crash.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 361px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Our sister site, <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/traffic-fatalities-nhtsa-americans-killed-cdc/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005"><em>AOL Autos</em></a>, reports more people are dying in car accidents in the US than ever before. Fatalities jumped by 5.3 percent last year to 34,080 deaths, according to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>. The increase is due in part to the fact that Americans are also driving more than ever before, covering 0.3-percent more miles in 2012 than 2011. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">NHTSA</a> says that may be due to the fact that modern vehicles offer better fuel efficiency than before, and thus allow drivers to cover greater distances for the same money.<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/motorcycle/">Motorcycle</a> fatalities accounted for 14.7 percent of all traffic deaths, with 5,000 riders dying last year alone. The Governors Highway Association says many of those deaths could have been prevented with proper helmet laws. Right now, 31 states don't require riders to wear helmets. Pedestrian deaths also increased by 4 percent to 4,280, and deaths attributed to distracted driving jumped by 1.92 percent to 3,331 people.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/">More drivers than ever are dying on US roads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 May 2013 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20563944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deaths</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>traffic deaths</category><category>traffic fatalities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20563944/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/13/more-drivers-than-ever-are-dying-on-us-roads/20563944/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20563944</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/car-crash_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2005-2007 Corvette investigated for faulty headlamps]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130510/AUTO0103/305100395/1148/auto01/U-S-officials-probe-Corvette-headlamp-problem"><img alt="2007 Chevrolet Corvette" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2007-corvette-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 409px;" /></a><br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130510/AUTO0103/305100395/1148/auto01/U-S-officials-probe-Corvette-headlamp-problem"><em>The Detroit News</em></a> reports the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has opened an investigation into 103,374 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/corvette/">Chevrolet Corvette</a> models built between 2005 and 2007. The administration is currently looking into a headlight issue after receiving 30 complaints from owners saying that the vehicle abruptly lost both low beams. Demonstrating its uncanny affinity for the obvious, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">NHTSA</a> said, "The loss of illumination impairs the driver's ability to see the roadway." Such a condition could lead to a crash.<br />
<br />
Some of the complaints state that the problem is intermittent, while others say the issue only began after driving over an object in the road. Still others say the low beams return after the vehicle has been parked for some time. Both high-beams and fog lights remain functional in every case, however.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/">2005-2007 Corvette investigated for faulty headlamps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 10 May 2013 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20564840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2005 chevy corvette</category><category>2006 chevy corvette</category><category>2007 chevy corvette</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy corvette</category><category>corvette headlights</category><category>investigation</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20564840/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/10/2005-2007-corvette-investigated-for-faulty-headlamps/20564840/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20564840</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2007-corvette-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Airbag recalls on track for record year]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/air-bag-recalls-doubled-on-track-for-record-year/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005"><img height="440"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/airbags.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The escalating complexity of automobiles is led in part by the escalating complexity of safety systems. The once dumb airbag that lived all alone inside the steering wheel, for instance, is now a family of smart airbags that might be able to detect the location of the passenger they're meant to protect and how best to inflate in order to protect him. Beyond the increased sticker price, the cost of that technology is more things going wrong.<br />
<br />
According to a story on <em>AOL Autos</em> there have been 22 recalls in the last six months due to airbags - covering more than 3.8 million cars up to 12 years old - compared to ten in the six months before. 15 of those have come this year, and at the current pace 2013 is on course to surpass the total of 23 airbag-related recalls of 2012. Malfunctions that led to the recalls have included airbags not deploying when expected, or deploying unexpectedly, or causing additional injuries and damage to occupants when they do deploy.<br />
<br />
It can take suppliers, automakers and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> years to address the issue and initiate a recall, even after hundreds of complaints have been filed. On top of that, the increasing concentration of the supplier base and the move to global platforms means that what might once have been a localized issue is now a global one. Some look at the number of airbag recalls as a problem with the technology, feeling "it's not working very well." Others see it as the improved operation of the corrective system - more issues are being recalled because automakers are taking safety concerns more seriously. The "right" answer, if there is one, is no doubt as complex as the technology, so <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/air-bag-recalls-doubled-on-track-for-record-year/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000005">click over to <em>AOL Autos</em></a> for the full story and decide for yourself.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/">Airbag recalls on track for record year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 06 May 2013 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20558464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airbag</category><category>airbag recall</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 11:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20558464/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/06/airbag-recalls-on-track-for-record-year/20558464/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20558464</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/airbags_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-2013-toyota-fj-cruiser/#photo-5738632"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/004-toyota-fj-cruiser.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Now, hold on. This recall isn't quite as serious as it sounds. Yes, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> is recalling 11,489 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/fj+cruiser/">FJ Cruiser</a> models from the 2007 to 2013 model years, and yes, it's because the vehicles, as <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchResults?searchType=ID&amp;targetCategory=R&amp;searchCriteria.nhtsa_ids=13V163000&amp;refurl=rss">the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration states</a>, "fail to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, 'Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.'" But read the fine print and you'll see the catch: This recall is only for vehicles fitted with the automaker's auxiliary lighting kit that can be mounted to the front bumper.<br />
<br />
Basically, the auxiliary lamp assemblies use 55-watt bulbs, and when these are turned on in conjunction with the upper beam headlamps, it's a pretty blinding sight. NHTSA states that excessively bright lights can blind other drivers, increasing the risk for a crash.<br />
<br />
To remedy the situation, Toyota will replace the 55-watt bulbs with cooler 35-watt units. The recall is expected to begin later this month. <a href="/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the full details in the NHTSA report.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/">Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 05 May 2013 11:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20557364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>headlights</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota fj cruiser</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 11:12:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20557364/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/20557364/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20557364</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/004-toyota-fj-cruiser_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA launches investigations into Ford Crown Victoria police cars, Dodge Viper and Porsche 911]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/30/autos-safety-idUSL2N0DH2O420130430"><img alt="​2005 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor - dead-on front view"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2005-ford-crown-victoria-police-interceptor-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 518px; " /></a><br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/30/autos-safety-idUSL2N0DH2O420130430"><em>Reuters</em></a> reports that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is investigating certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/crown victoria/">Ford Crown Victoria</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/911/">Porsche 911</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/viper/">Dodge Viper</a> models for potential defects. NHTSA is currently looking into 2005-2008 Crown Victoria police car models for steering column failures that could cause the upper and lower portions of the steering shaft to separate. Such a condition would lead to a loss of control. So far there are 195,000 vehicles involved with 15 warranty claims.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, 10,000 Porsche 911 sports cars are under investigation for a faulty cooling hose fitting. The loose hose could cause a rapid loss of coolant that could not only damage the engine, but cause a slick road surface that could pose a danger to other traffic. The investigation is only concerned with models equipped with 2001-2007 models. There have been 10 owner complaints of failures, with one owner saying the coolant caused him to loose control and spin the vehicle off of the road.<br />
<br />
Investigators are also looking into certain 2005-2006 Dodge Viper models for a rear suspension knuckle failure. Two owners have filed complaints after crashes, and NHTSA is now looking into 2,500 of the vehicles.<br />
<br />
Note: these probes aren't recalls, but can lead to them if NHTSA or the automakers find sufficient evidence of danger to drivers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/">NHTSA launches investigations into Ford Crown Victoria police cars, Dodge Viper and Porsche 911</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 01 May 2013 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20554541/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dodge viper</category><category>ford</category><category>ford crown victoria</category><category>ford crown victoria police interceptor</category><category>ford police interceptor</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa investigation</category><category>nhtsa probe</category><category>porsche 911</category><category>viper</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20554541/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/01/nhtsa-launches-investigations-into-ford-crown-victoria-police-ca/20554541/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20554541</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2005-ford-crown-victoria-police-interceptor-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/" rel="tag">Subaru</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-subaru-forester-xt-first-drive/"><img alt="2014 Subaru Forester - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/forester-xt-lead-opt.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 419px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Pedal entrapment and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/unintended+acceleration/">unintended acceleration</a> are hot-button topics these days, so automakers are always staying alert for potential problems. For <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru</a> and its newly introduced <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/forester/">2014 Forester</a>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued a recall due to improperly manufactured floor mats that could become an obstruction for the gas, brake or clutch pedals. The good news, of course, is that even if drivers experience this problem, the 2014 Forester comes standard with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/brake+override/">brake override</a>.<br />
<br />
At issue with the floor mats on 10,137 Forester models built between January and March of this year is that the resin material used on the underside of the mats can curl when exposed to heat. If the leading edge of the driver's mat curls enough, it can come in contact with the pedals making acceleration, braking and shifting more difficult - possibly resulting in a crash. To fix the problem, Subaru is replacing the entire set of floor mats in all of the affected units. The official NHTSA recall notice is posted <a href="/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/">Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20551818/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2014 subaru forester</category><category>forester recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>recall</category><category>subaru</category><category>subaru forester</category><category>subaru recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20551818/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/20551818/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20551818</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/forester-xt-lead-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Anthony Foxx nominated by Obama to be next Transportation Secretary [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a></p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/04/29/president-obama-nominates-anthony-foxx-secretary-transportation"><img alt="Anthony Foxx"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/anthony-foxx.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Anthony Foxx, labeled by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/obama/">President Obama</a> as "one of the most effective mayors Charlotte [North Carolina] has ever seen," has been nominated by the President to be the next Secretary of Transportation. Foxx would take over for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ray+lahood/">Ray LaHood</a>, who announced that he would be <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/29/transportation-secretary-ray-lahood-stepping-down/">stepping down</a> a few months ago.<br />
<br />
President Obama had only positive things to say about Mr. LaHood, who had previously served in Congress as a Republican, calling him "a model for the kind of bipartisan approach to governance I think we need so badly in this town." Foxx had been a Democrat, but said during the nomination speech, "There is no such thing as a Democratic or Republican road, bridge, port, airfield or rail system."<br />
<br />
Scroll down below to see a video from <em>CBS News</em> highlighting Obama's announcement and Foxx's acceptance.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Anthony Foxx nominated by Obama to be next Transportation Secretary [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/">Anthony Foxx nominated by Obama to be next Transportation Secretary [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20552424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anthony foxx</category><category>anthony foxx secretary of transportation</category><category>anthonyfoxxsecretaryoftransportation</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>obama</category><category>obama transportation nominee</category><category>obamatransportationnominee</category><category>ray lahood</category><category>transportation secretary</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20552424/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/30/anthony-foxx-nominated-by-obama-to-be-next-transportation-secret/20552424/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20552424</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/anthony-foxx_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-nissan-altima-first-drive/#photo-5044351"><img alt="2013 Nissan Altima - front three-quarter view with brick wall" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2013-nissan-altima.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px; " /></a><br />
<br />
A pressure regulator that over- or underinflated spare tires for five days earlier this year has led to a recall of 123,308 units of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/altima/">2013 Nissan Altima</a>. Sedans that were manufactured from March 21-26 are those possibly affected by the temporary tire snafu, the recall for which will begin on May 3.<br />
<br />
Those notified of the issue can take their sedans to their local <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> dealer, who will check the tire pressure and correct it if necessary, but we imagine owners can probably just whip out a tire gauge to check and adjust the inflation for themselves. Should you need it, there's an official notice from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> <a href="/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#continued">below</a> with a few more details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/">Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20550797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 nissan altima</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan altima</category><category>nissan altima recall</category><category>nissan recall</category><category>recall</category><category>spare tire</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20550797/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/20550797/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20550797</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2013-nissan-altima_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>