<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: Stand-alone Lincoln-Mercury dealers being scaled out of existence]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-stand-alone-lincoln-mercury-dealers-dying-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-stand-alone-lincoln-mercury-dealers-dying-off/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-stand-alone-lincoln-mercury-dealers-dying-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercury/" rel="tag">Mercury</a></p><a href="www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091109/ANA05/911059996/1256 &amp;AssignSessionID=173371748339590"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/78285970-630op.jpg" /></a><br /> <br /> In 2006, Ford began to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/11/ford-to-shrinkdealer-network-over-three-years/">shrink its dealership network</a> in order to more efficiently align its distribution network. Three years later, it appears that the hardest hit are the company's stand-alone Lincoln-Mercury dealerships. While there were 619 Lincoln-Mercury dealerships nationwide just a few years ago, the number had dwindled down to just 357 at the beginning of 2009. <br /> <br /> <em>Automotive News</em> recently spoke with Ford CEO Alan Mulally about the future of the Lincoln brand and its stand-alone Lincoln-Mercury stores. While Ford's current strategy is pushing combo Ford-Lincoln-Mercury retailers, Mulally would not confirm that eliminating the stand-alone Lincoln-Mercury dealerships was the desired end result. When pushed on the question, Mulally reiterated that Ford was focusing on building a distribution network which allowed sales volume, product breadth, and profitability... qualities that are apparently better served by the Ford-Lincoln-Mercury store. <br /><br />Mulally added that although these combo dealerships will be selling the Lincoln MKS on the same lot as the Ford Taurus (both vehicles share platforms and mechanicals), retailers will learn how to deliver the sales experience that fits the vehicle and differentiates the brand. Whether this concept works or whether car salesmen simply take the easy route and sell the less expensive Ford remains to be seen.<br /><br />Either way, it has to be asked - is peeling away at the automaker's stand-alone LM dealers part of a larger plan to do away with Mercury altogether? Inquiring minds want to know...<br /> <br /> [Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091109/ANA05/911059996/1256 &amp;AssignSessionID=173371748339590">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req. | Image: Stephen Brashear/Getty]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-stand-alone-lincoln-mercury-dealers-dying-off/">REPORT: Stand-alone Lincoln-Mercury dealers being scaled out of existence</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-stand-alone-lincoln-mercury-dealers-dying-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19228972/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/report-stand-alone-lincoln-mercury-dealers-dying-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan mulally</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>car dealer</category><category>car dealers</category><category>car showroom</category><category>CarDealer</category><category>CarDealers</category><category>CarShowroom</category><category>Combination</category><category>Consolidation</category><category>Dealerships</category><category>Dual</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford dealerships</category><category>ford mercury</category><category>Ford-Lincoln-Mercury</category><category>FordDealerships</category><category>FordMercury</category><category>lincoln</category><category>Lincoln-Mercur</category><category>lincoln-mercury</category><category>Mercury</category><category>mulally</category><category>Mullally</category><category>showroom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft CEO gets 1,000,000th Ford with SYNC]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/microsoft-ceo-gets-1-000-000th-sync-vehicle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/microsoft-ceo-gets-1-000-000th-sync-vehicle/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/microsoft-ceo-gets-1-000-000th-sync-vehicle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/one-millionth-sync/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/1millionthsync_1706s.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><strong><em><small>One Millionth SYNC: Click above to view the high-res gallery</small></em></strong><br /></div>
<br />Ford and SYNC have combined to be the peanut butter and jelly of automotive tech combo deals. 80% of the vehicles Ford sells now has the infotainment system, helping the Blue Oval and Microsoft reach 1 million sales of the infotainment system in less than two years.<br /><br />Since Microsoft created the SYNC software, it has just as much reason to celebrate its success as Ford. Microsoft CEO and Detroit native Steve Ballmer decided the best way to celebrate was to get his hands on SYNC vehicle number 1 million; a 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid. The 41 mpg sedan was delivered by none other than Ford CEO Alan Mulally. <br /><br />Mulally reiterated his support of SYNC, saying that Ford would "continue to innovate and expand the capability of SYNC by integrating even more new technologies that fit our customers' lifestyles." SYNC already interfaces with navigation and entertainment systems, and 911 Assist helps call emergency services in the event of an accident. SYNC will receive further updates this summer when it gains the ability to deliver traffic, directions and information services. Hit the jump to view the Ford press release, and check out the gallery below to see Mulally deliver a 2010 Fusion Hybrid to the Microsoft CEO.<br /><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/one-millionth-sync/low/">One Millionth SYNC</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/one-millionth-sync/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/1millionthsync_3287_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/one-millionth-sync/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/1millionthsync_3252_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/one-millionth-sync/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/1millionthsync_3239_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/one-millionth-sync/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/1millionthsync_1706_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: Ford]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/microsoft-ceo-gets-1-000-000th-sync-vehicle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft CEO gets 1,000,000th Ford with SYNC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/microsoft-ceo-gets-1-000-000th-sync-vehicle/">Microsoft CEO gets 1,000,000th Ford with SYNC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/microsoft-ceo-gets-1-000-000th-sync-vehicle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19049070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/microsoft-ceo-gets-1-000-000th-sync-vehicle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ballmer</category><category>ford</category><category>Ford Fusion</category><category>FordFusion</category><category>fusion</category><category>fusion hybrid</category><category>FusionHybrid</category><category>hybrid</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mulally</category><category>sync</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mulally on Ford: "We are competitive now."]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/30/mulally-on-ford-we-are-competitive-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/30/mulally-on-ford-we-are-competitive-now/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/30/mulally-on-ford-we-are-competitive-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20090330/AUTO01/903300370/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/ford_competitive.jpg" /></a><br /><br />If we were cynics, we could say that Ford just happened to get stuck in deep doo-doo when America's credit markets were still reasonably flexible. When Ford leveraged all of its assets, right down to its logo, the most difficult part was probably not getting the money, it was probably swallowing its Blue Oval pride. Yet cynics or not, a CEO has to know what to do with said money, and Alan Mulally feels he and his company have done well enough to proclaim "We are competitive now" in a new interview with <em>The Detroit News. <br /></em><br />For starters, Ford managed to get the UAW to concede more ground and rework agreements. Unlike <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/23/gm-bondholders-not-digging-restructuring-plan/">GM's present situation</a>, Ford's bondholders didn't keep shaking their heads when Ford needed to exchange debt for equity, permitting Dearborn to reduce its debt liability by nearly 33%. Ford (finally!) began showering its European design flair and cars on an American public thirsting for beautiful domestic offerings. And Ford has cut production to match demand. The result: there are 32% fewer cars on dealer lots than a year ago.<br /><br />Mulally says that Ford has prepared well enough that it won't need to take taxpayer money unless things get decidedly worse, but he doesn't believe that will happen. Although he believes that Ford can't turn itself fully around until the economy does, he did say, "The downturn is a temporary thing. We just have to make it through it." <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20090330/AUTO01/903300370/1148/rss25">Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/30/mulally-on-ford-we-are-competitive-now/">Mulally on Ford: "We are competitive now."</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/article/20090330/AUTO01/903300370/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/30/mulally-on-ford-we-are-competitive-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1502093/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/30/mulally-on-ford-we-are-competitive-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan mulally</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>auto industry</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>blue oval</category><category>BlueOval</category><category>earnings</category><category>financials</category><category>ford</category><category>ford motor</category><category>FordMotor</category><category>mulally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mulally confirms Ford isn't seeking federal funds]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/mulally-confirms-ford-isnt-seeking-federal-funds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/mulally-confirms-ford-isnt-seeking-federal-funds/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/mulally-confirms-ford-isnt-seeking-federal-funds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/25/autos/ford_no_more_money.reut/index.htm?postversion=2009012511"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/mulallynada09bubble2.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Ford won't be joining General Motors and Chrysler on any return trips to Uncle Sam's Bailout Buffet. The automaker plans to stay in Dearborn and cook dinner at home, so says CEO Alan Mulally, who told reporters at the NADA convention, "We don't want to borrow any more money. We have sufficient liquidity to fund our transformation plan, which means our business is in a relatively good shape." While GM and Chrysler were approved for over $17B in bailout bucks and are already well into the cash pile, Mulally had instead requested access to a $9 billion line of credit (you know, just in case). The difference: the feds have yet to move on Ford's request. <br /><br />Ford's decision to basically mortgage everything it owns during a $23 billion borrowing spree in 2006 has become the catalyst for a significant and ongoing PR victory. Those actions are what let Mulally distance himself from his counterparts during the Capitol Hill bailout hearings, and they're paying dividends again now as Mulally tells the world that Ford doesn't intend to look for any more dough. We've talked to plenty of friends and relatives - people who don't otherwise follow the auto industry - who view Ford in a more positive light <em>specifically</em> because they didn't take bailout money. Yeah, Ford is in debt up to its eyes, but it made its moves on its own, long before the Detroit death struggle became C-SPAN programming. If Ford manages to pull this off, Mulally will have shown himself to be well worth every penny that Ford pays him. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/25/autos/ford_no_more_money.reut/index.htm?postversion=2009012511">CNN Money</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/mulally-confirms-ford-isnt-seeking-federal-funds/">Mulally confirms Ford isn't seeking federal funds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/25/autos/ford_no_more_money.reut/index.htm?postversion=2009012511>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/mulally-confirms-ford-isnt-seeking-federal-funds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1440087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/mulally-confirms-ford-isnt-seeking-federal-funds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>ford</category><category>loans</category><category>mulally</category><category>nada</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford CEO Alan Mulally to keynote CES]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/ford-ceo-alan-mulally-to-keynote-ces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/ford-ceo-alan-mulally-to-keynote-ces/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/ford-ceo-alan-mulally-to-keynote-ces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ces/" rel="tag">CES</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080829/ANA02/808289974/1200"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/mulallyipod_opt.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Looks like the biggest gadget convention on Earth is becoming <em>the</em> place for big automotive announcements. You'll remember that two years ago at the Consumer Electronics Show, Ford and Microsoft announced their partnership on Ford's SYNC system, and last January <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/08/ces-2008-live-blogging-the-rick-wagoner-keynote/">General Motor's CEO Rick Wagoner</a> chose Las Vegas to unveil the all-electric Cadillac <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/08/ces-2008-cadillac-provoq-fuel-cell-concept-revealed/">Provoq concept</a>. It was the first time in the convention's 40-year history an automaker had revealed a concept car to the world there.<br /><br />This year it's Ford's turn again at CES, with <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080829/ANA02/808289974/1200">CEO Alan Mulally</a> taking the keynote spot. CES runs January 8-11 next year, but there's no word yet on what day Mulally will make his appearance. There's also no word on what he'll be saying or revealing to the thousands of people gathered in that Vegas ballroom. New SYNC features are a given, but will Ford also choose CES to roll out its plug-in hybrid project? Stay tuned for full coverage from the Autoblog team.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ces-2008-cadillac-provoq-live-reveal/low/">CES 2008: Cadillac Provoq Live reveal</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ces-2008-cadillac-provoq-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cadillac-provoq-live-reveal-1-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ces-2008-cadillac-provoq-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cadillac-provoq-live-reveal-1-10_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ces-2008-cadillac-provoq-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cadillac-provoq-live-reveal-1-11_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ces-2008-cadillac-provoq-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cadillac-provoq-live-reveal-1-12_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ces-2008-cadillac-provoq-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cadillac-provoq-live-reveal-1-13_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080829/ANA02/808289974/1200">Automotive News</a> - sub. req'd, Photo by GEOFF ROBINS/AFP/Getty]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/ford-ceo-alan-mulally-to-keynote-ces/">Ford CEO Alan Mulally to keynote CES</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20080829/ANA02/808289974/1200>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/ford-ceo-alan-mulally-to-keynote-ces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1299176/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/ford-ceo-alan-mulally-to-keynote-ces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan mulally</category><category>alan mulally ces</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>AlanMulallyCes</category><category>allan mulally</category><category>AllanMulally</category><category>ces</category><category>consumer electronics show</category><category>ConsumerElectronicsShow</category><category>ford</category><category>mulally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tracinda meets with Bill and Al, talks turnaround]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/tracinda-meets-with-bill-and-al-talks-turnaround/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/tracinda-meets-with-bill-and-al-talks-turnaround/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/tracinda-meets-with-bill-and-al-talks-turnaround/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080617/ANA02/105782805/1200/rss02&amp;rssfeed=rss02"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/burns_ford_450.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Despite the rumors of contentiousness surrounding Kirk Kerkorian's Tracinda Corporation and its agitation in Dearborn, Ford reports that a recent talk between Executive Chairman Bill Ford Jr., CEO Alan Mulally, and the investment firm were informal and positive. Never a shrinking violet, 91-year-old Kirk Kerkorian has held large stakes of each of the Detroit 3 in the past. Tracinda's most recent foray into Ford's stock coincides with a shift by the Blue Oval away from its historically strong grounding in truck sales. Ford believes that the truck sales balloon has permanently deflated, and is idling plants and shifting production over to more fuel efficient vehicles as crude oil prices continue to ratchet up an economic squeeze. <br /><br />Ford's already said "forget it" to a planned return to profitability in 2009, and its talks with Tracinda illustrate that Ford realizes it may not have the lock on better ideas. On the agenda at this particular meeting was an analysis of publicaly-announced details of "The Way Forward." Right now both Ford and Tracinda are coming away from the table repeating niceties, but if history is any guide, at some point Captain Kirk might start instigating in ways that are less than popular. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080617/ANA02/105782805/1200/rss02&amp;rssfeed=rss02">Automotive News - sub req., </a>Photo: HarryPotterSociety.com]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/tracinda-meets-with-bill-and-al-talks-turnaround/">Tracinda meets with Bill and Al, talks turnaround</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080617/ANA02/105782805/1200/rss02&amp;rssfeed=rss02>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/tracinda-meets-with-bill-and-al-talks-turnaround/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1228685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/tracinda-meets-with-bill-and-al-talks-turnaround/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>kerkorian</category><category>kerkorianford</category><category>kerkorians tracinda</category><category>KerkoriansTracinda</category><category>mulally</category><category>mulally ford</category><category>mulally tracinda</category><category>MulallyFord</category><category>MulallyTracinda</category><category>tracinda</category><category>tracinda corp</category><category>tracinda corp.</category><category>TracindaCorp</category><category>TracindaCorp.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Desperate times: Ford will retool truck plants to build cars]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/11/desperate-times-ford-will-retool-truck-plants-to-build-cars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/11/desperate-times-ford-will-retool-truck-plants-to-build-cars/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/11/desperate-times-ford-will-retool-truck-plants-to-build-cars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080611/AUTO01/806110388/1148"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/52690070_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a> </p>
<p>Ford's recent announcement to reduce its white collar workforce costs by 15% shows that Mulally &amp; Co. are dead-serious about turning around the Dearborn, MI automaker. The newest twist in the FoMoCo saga takes the situation from serious to near desperate, as plant managers and union leadership are convening in Dearborn to discuss switching factories from truck to car production. Such a move is much easier to make in one of Toyota or Honda's flexible manufacturing plants, but Ford has plenty of facilities that are hardwired to build only one or two products. Analysts say that costs could be $250 million a year or more, which would make for a huge dent in Ford's already shrinking bank account.</p>
<p>The good news is that Ford is looking at its European products as the vehicles it needs to build State-side. We enthusiasts have been drooling over the Euro Focus, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/30/ford-eyeing-mexico-for-fiesta-production/">Fiesta</a>, Mondeo, S-Max and Kuga for quite a while, but their fuel-efficient ways will have the masses finally thinking Ford first if they come here. </p>
<p>Ford won't announce its plans until July, and some details will be held back for months more, but The Detroit News has it on good authority that the Michigan Truck and Louisville plants will be part of the shift away from gas guzzlers. Louisville, which currently produces the Explorer, would shift to a unibody facility that produces cars and CUVs. Michigan Truck, which produces the Navigator and Expedition, will make room for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/12/enter-the-rumormill-ford-considering-f-100-small-pickup/">F-100</a>, which will be smaller and likely more efficient than the F-150 on which it's based.</p>
<p>It's amazing what $4 per gallon gasoline can do to U.S. manufacturing, no? Ford just may be on the verge of the largest shift in the company's 105-year history, and we're all here to witness it. Here's hoping the plan works.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080611/AUTO01/806110388/1148">The Detroit News</a>, Photo by JEFF HAYNES/AFP/Getty]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/11/desperate-times-ford-will-retool-truck-plants-to-build-cars/">Desperate times: Ford will retool truck plants to build cars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080611/AUTO01/806110388/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/11/desperate-times-ford-will-retool-truck-plants-to-build-cars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1222226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/11/desperate-times-ford-will-retool-truck-plants-to-build-cars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>euro focus</category><category>EuroFocus</category><category>F-150</category><category>fiesta</category><category>flexible manufacturing</category><category>FlexibleManufacturing</category><category>Ford</category><category>Mulally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford's "effing" problem needs a fix]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/18/fords-effing-problem-needs-a-fix/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/18/fords-effing-problem-needs-a-fix/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/18/fords-effing-problem-needs-a-fix/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p> </p>
<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/verve_s.jpg" /><br /><br />Towards the end of 2003, Ford unveiled the Freestar. It was a lousy minivan, and its name wasn't much better. From there the f-bombs started pouring in with the Freestyle, Five Hundred, and Fusion. Ford had a Shakespearean stranglehold on alliteration, but outside of the decent success of the Fusion, Ford's effed-up naming convention brought little name recognition to the Blue Oval's car lineup. When Allan Mulally came to town, he scrubbed the Freestyle and Five Hundred names for the much more recognizable and respected <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/18/one-of-five-ford-dealers-saying-five-hundred-instead-of-taurus/">Taurus </a>and Taurus X, but unfortunately the basic shape of the family haulers didn't change enough for customers to want them.<br /><br /><em>Detroit News</em> Columnist Daniel Howes accurately points out that Ford is back to effing up the names of its vehicles. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/2009-ford-flex-preliminary-pricing-starts-at-28-700/">Flex</a> arrives this summer, and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/ford-could-rename-fiesta-as-verve/">Fiesta</a> arrives in 2010. The <em>News</em> says Ford marketing head Jim Farley questioned why the Flex name would adorn Ford's full-size crossover, but even the ex-Toyota wunderkind is unable or unwilling to lose the F. We don't understand the fixation Ford has with the sixth letter of the alphabet. The Dearborn automaker's two most successful cars of the past 40 years are the Taurus and Mustang, both of which are decidedly sans F. As a matter of fact, the Camry, Civic, Accord, Impala, and Malibu are all alliteration-free. Sure, if the Flex and Fiesta are great products they'll sell no matter what they're called, but we'd like for Ford to give us an effing break.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080218/OPINION03/802180323">Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/18/fords-effing-problem-needs-a-fix/">Ford's "effing" problem needs a fix</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080218/OPINION03/802180323>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/18/fords-effing-problem-needs-a-fix/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1117896/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/18/fords-effing-problem-needs-a-fix/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fiesta</category><category>Flex</category><category>Ford</category><category>Jim Farley</category><category>JimFarley</category><category>Mulally</category><category>Verve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Business Week grades Mulally's first year]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/07/business-week-grades-mulallys-first-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/07/business-week-grades-mulallys-first-year/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/07/business-week-grades-mulallys-first-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/aug2007/bw20070824_264677.htm?campaign_id=rss_autos"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/mulally_215.jpg" alt="" /></a>Alan Mulally took over as Ford's CEO one year ago this month, and some of you may be wondering how he's doing. Business Week magazine says he's doing pretty good, actually, despite a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/by-the-numbers-august-2007/">16% decline</a> in sales last month, a stock price less than the cost of a used CD and the piecemeal selloff of PAG. <br /><br />BW says Mulally gets an "A" in <strong>Profit and Loss</strong> for helping Ford earn a $750 million profit in the second quarter, even though the company expects a loss for the this year and next as well.<br /><br />In <strong>Restructuring</strong>, Mulally slips to a "B," mostly because BW's author questions the decision to sell Volvo, and speculates that Ford's newish CEO wants badly to shut down the Mercury division. The article says that would be an expensive move that wouldn't be much of a gain for Ford.<br /><br />As for <strong>Product</strong>, Mulally earns another "A" for better sharing of platforms and the work Ford is doing with its Australian arm on rear-wheel-drive cars. <br /><br />Overall, Mulally gets an "A-" average, with his worst grade coming in <strong>Personnel</strong>, an area where BW says the CEO should at least consider bringing in some high-profile outside talent to round out his management team. We suppose Chrysler would get an "A" in that class.<br /><br />[Source: Business Week]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/07/business-week-grades-mulallys-first-year/">Business Week grades Mulally's first year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/sep2007/bw2007094_751875_page_2.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/07/business-week-grades-mulallys-first-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/983852/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/07/business-week-grades-mulallys-first-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan mulally</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>ford alan mulally</category><category>ford ceo</category><category>ford turnaround</category><category>FordAlanMulally</category><category>FordCeo</category><category>FordTurnaround</category><category>mulally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mulally suggests a return to "Have You Driven A Ford Lately?"]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/mulally-suggests-a-return-to-have-you-driven-a-ford-lately/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/mulally-suggests-a-return-to-have-you-driven-a-ford-lately/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/mulally-suggests-a-return-to-have-you-driven-a-ford-lately/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/timewarp/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070824/AUTO01/708240331/1148/rss25"><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="183" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/driven_ford.jpg" alt="" /></a>Resurrecting the Taurus name isn't the only element from Ford's past that Alan Mulally thinks should make a comeback. Despite having one of their best lineups ever and winning accolades, customers have other makes further up on their list. Potential buyers who actually check out what Ford has to offer often come away impressed, and for this reason Mulally is suggesting a return to the "Have You Driven a Ford Lately?" tagline. <br /><br />Please, no. Forward momentum, Alan. The return to the Taurus was smart, the name recognition alone is priceless. In that vein, Mulally wants to stop with the recent Ford practice of confusing and confounding consumers by switching model names so frequently. Horray! Building equity in a model name by sticking with it and continually improving the vehicle the badge is stuck to has worked quite well for Honda and Toyota with the Accord and Camry, and it'd be a smart thing for Ford to emulate. Inane 1980s marketing campaigns aside, Mulally is being effective at pushing Ford to operate their business in a smarter manner while building better product. There may be life in the old Tin Lizzie brand yet. <br /><br /><em>Hit the jump for a taste of Ford's 1984 television campaign.<br /><br /></em>[Source: Detroit News]<em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/mulally-suggests-a-return-to-have-you-driven-a-ford-lately/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mulally suggests a return to "Have You Driven A Ford Lately?"</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/mulally-suggests-a-return-to-have-you-driven-a-ford-lately/">Mulally suggests a return to "Have You Driven A Ford Lately?"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070824/AUTO01/708240331/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/mulally-suggests-a-return-to-have-you-driven-a-ford-lately/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/974479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/27/mulally-suggests-a-return-to-have-you-driven-a-ford-lately/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>campaign</category><category>ford</category><category>mulally</category><category>naming</category><category>slogan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mulally makes it official: Next Focus and Fusion based on global platforms]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/mulally-makes-it-official-next-focus-and-fusion-based-on-global/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/mulally-makes-it-official-next-focus-and-fusion-based-on-global/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/mulally-makes-it-official-next-focus-and-fusion-based-on-global/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070823/REG01/70823001/1116/emaildailyANE02"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/focus06_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />Despite not being official, we've known for some time that Ford CEO Alan Mulally wants to increase the number of platforms shared by its U.S. and European divisions. It's something Ford fanboys have been demanding for some time, and yesterday Mulally officially confirmed that the next-gen Focus and Fusion would be global vehicles, sharing platforms with their counterparts across the pond. This will be in addition to the B-class car that's coming in the form of the new European Fiesta small car that will slot below the Focus in Ford's U.S. lineup. <br /><br />The amount of overlap between Ford in the U.S. and Ford of Europe was one of the first things that surprised Mulally when he arrived at Ford exactly one year ago. He's quickly set about fixing the redundancy, but we won't likely see the fruits of his labor until 2010 or 2011 when the next Focus is expected to debut for both markets.<br /><br />Ford execs have said that these cars will wear different styling and be tuned differently, but we've heard from inside the Blue Oval that a conflict between U.S. and Euro designers is growing, with the former group upset that its delicate balance of three-bar grilles will be upset by the Fiesta, and possibly other models, arriving with FoE's "Kinetic Design" theme. <br /><br />[Source: Automotive News, sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/mulally-makes-it-official-next-focus-and-fusion-based-on-global/">Mulally makes it official: Next Focus and Fusion based on global platforms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070823/REG01/70823001/1116/emaildailyANE02>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/mulally-makes-it-official-next-focus-and-fusion-based-on-global/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/972233/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/mulally-makes-it-official-next-focus-and-fusion-based-on-global/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan mulally</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>fiesta</category><category>focus</category><category>ford fiesta</category><category>ford focus</category><category>ford fusion</category><category>ford mondeo</category><category>ford of europe</category><category>FordFiesta</category><category>FordFocus</category><category>FordFusion</category><category>FordMondeo</category><category>FordOfEurope</category><category>fusion</category><category>global platform</category><category>GlobalPlatform</category><category>kinetic design</category><category>KineticDesign</category><category>mondeo</category><category>mulally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mulally not proposing a gas tax - but he's not against it]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/AUTO01/708090419/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/mulally_gas_tax.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>The hallmark of the environmental debate is that there are so many important players on so many different sides. Eminent scientists and intellectuals have taken every side of the debate, challenging their eminent colleagues. When it comes to the two most involved and highly charged players, the automakers and politicians, things get even more curious. On the same day that Bush opposed a gas tax to give states more money to repair bridges, Alan Mulally said he supports the idea of a gas tax to encourage customers to buy more fuel efficient vehicles.</p>
<p>Mulally believes Congress' CAFE standards represent failed policy and has hurt automakers. Regulating fuel efficiency has, in his opinion, only lead to consumers buying more cars and driving more. While making sure to stress that he and Ford are all in favor of fuel efficient vehicles and environmental health, he wants some of the onus put back on consumers. He said, "I just think it's so important that we all join in this debate and we really decide what we want to do about energy security and global warming. A piece of that could be a tax." </p>
<p>[Source: Detroit News]</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mulally not proposing a gas tax - but he's not against it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/">Mulally not proposing a gas tax - but he's not against it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/AUTO01/708090419/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/961358/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>gas</category><category>gasoline</category><category>mulally</category><category>tax</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[From the "That Was Yesterday" files: Jag, Land Rover, Volvo are on the block]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/11/from-the-that-was-yesterday-files-jag-land-rover-volvo-are/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/11/from-the-that-was-yesterday-files-jag-land-rover-volvo-are/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/11/from-the-that-was-yesterday-files-jag-land-rover-volvo-are/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/land-rover/" rel="tag">Land Rover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/fiat/" rel="tag">Fiat</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/go.jpg"  alt="" />In April, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/11/ford-keeping-jaguar-in-the-house-mullaly-says-were-100-percen/">Mulally said</a> Jaguar was part of the Way Forward plan and wasn't going to be sold, but needed to get its act together. News today, however, is that Ford has been trying to sell Jaguar and Land Rover to Fiat ever since February. Ford has also retained Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to help it sell all of the PAG brands, including Volvo.
<p>The talks with Fiat -- held between Ford of Europe head Lewis Booth and Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne -- fell through last month. Fiat was interested in Land Rover because of the pace of SUV sales, and the fact that its "five brands are almost nonexistent in the growing global SUV market." Fiat was also interested in Land Rover's US dealership network, thinking Alfa might be able to pair up with them. Jaguar interested Fiat for its RWD platforms and V6 and V8 engines. But Marchionne ended the talks over fears its credit rating would be adversely affected by acquiring Jaguar and Land Rover. </p>
<p>PAG lost $327 million last year, but could be in the black this year, overall, having reported a $402 million pre-tax profit in the first quarter. Jaguar, however, has held things back: it has lost $500 million to $1 billion every year for the last six years, and Jag itself says it will be in the red this year and next. Neither Ford nor Fiat would admit to the talks, but Ford said it "is continuing to assess a number of strategic options for all of its operations. We're not specifying what they are and what we're evaluating." </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News]<a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070611/SUB/70608091/1175&amp;refsect" /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/11/from-the-that-was-yesterday-files-jag-land-rover-volvo-are/">From the "That Was Yesterday" files: Jag, Land Rover, Volvo are on the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070611/SUB/70608091/1175&amp;refsect=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/11/from-the-that-was-yesterday-files-jag-land-rover-volvo-are/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/914940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/11/from-the-that-was-yesterday-files-jag-land-rover-volvo-are/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fiat</category><category>ford</category><category>Jaguar</category><category>land</category><category>mulally</category><category>rover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Autoblog Podcast #63 [Enhanced]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/autoblog-podcast-63-enhanced/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/autoblog-podcast-63-enhanced/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/autoblog-podcast-63-enhanced/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><object width="425" height="350">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2RyjYpbUXlQ" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2RyjYpbUXlQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed></object><br /><br />The enhanced version of the Autoblog Podcast #63 has again been rendered out for your visual consumption. In part one of #63, we talk about the next Suzuki Swift coming to the United States. In the podcast's second section we give quite a bit of time to the Alan Mulally - George Bush - hydrogen explosion debate. Finally, we discuss Bub Lutz, and his comment that new EPA regulations could mothball GM's RWD program.<br /><br />Check it out. Per your suggestions, we cut the podcast into three sections for smaller downloads, and we've also embedded sections two and three of the podcast after the jump. If you have any more suggestions on how to improve the enhanced version of the Podcast, let us know in the comments. We're working on a better distribution system than shoving all three in our current RSS feed of the audio-only version, so soon you'll be able to subscribe just to the enhanced version's RSS feed. <br /><br /><strong><a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/videos/pod 63 section 1.mov">DOWNLOAD</a></strong> <strong>Part One</strong> to your desktop (Suzuki Swift)<br /><strong><a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/videos/pod 63 section 2.mov">DOWNLOAD</a></strong> <strong>Part Two</strong> to your desktop (Mulally, Bush)<br /><strong><a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/videos/pod 63 section 3.mov">DOWNLOAD</a></strong> <strong>Part Three</strong> to your desktop (Lutz, RWD)<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=Autoblogvideo"><strong>SUBSCRIBE</strong></a> to the Autoblog YouTube video channel<br /><br /><a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s="><strong>SUBSCRIBE</strong></a> to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes<br /><a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml"><strong>ADD</strong></a> the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/autoblog-podcast-63-enhanced/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Autoblog Podcast #63 [Enhanced]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/autoblog-podcast-63-enhanced/">Autoblog Podcast #63 [Enhanced]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/autoblog-podcast-63/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/autoblog-podcast-63-enhanced/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/877660/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/autoblog-podcast-63-enhanced/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoblog</category><category>lutz</category><category>mulally</category><category>podcast</category><category>podcast 63</category><category>Podcast63</category><category>swift</category><category>video podcast</category><category>VideoPodcast</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bill Ford, Jr. on FoMoCo's Way Forward: everything still on the table]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/bill-ford-jr-on-fomocos-way-forward-everything-still-on-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/bill-ford-jr-on-fomocos-way-forward-everything-still-on-the/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/bill-ford-jr-on-fomocos-way-forward-everything-still-on-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p nd="1"><a href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/04/17/report-ford-still-considering-sale-or-partnership/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/ford_mulally.jpg" /></a>Ford, Mulally, and Ford. Unlike the Three Musketeers, in this case it's all for two -- Bill Ford, Jr. and Alan Mulally -- and those two for one: Ford Motor Company. An eye-opening article called "Driven to the Brink" in the first issue of <em><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2007/04/16/Driven-to-the-Brink?page=0">Portfolio</a></em> magazine features a lengthy look at Ford and an interview with Bill Ford, Jr. on what he's been through, where the company is, and where he has to make sure it goes. </p>
<p nd="1">The initial numbers are staggering: a $12.7 billion loss in 2006, more than 38,000 jobs gone, a dozen plants shuttered, and of course, the $28 million paid to Mulally. Behind those numbers are others: $23 billion to finance a 2-year restructuring, $17 billion in expenditures over the next two years, nine more plant closures, 70% of all models new or improved by 2009. And behind those numbers is the scion held responsible for an American institution who wanted to create an environmentally responsible company before he was forced to, who had to fight his own company bureaucracy, and who, when turned down by Mulally the first time, said he was "silent and devastated. I had no Plan B." The quote about selling the company that some outlets attribute to Ford wasn't actually spoken by him (that was actually his former chief of staff), but on the subject of the future, he did admit, "We felt the best thing we could do was get our house in order. That doesn't preclude anything down the road."</p>
<p nd="4">The article dangles a number of fascinating possibilities. No matter what happens now, though, the company and the family are all in: to get the company that restructuring loan, Ford mortgaged absolutely everything -- even its own logo. As Anne Ford said, "If we lose, we lose everything." You can read the full article <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2007/04/16/Driven-to-the-Brink?page=0">here</a>.</p>
<p>[Source: eGM Car Tech]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/bill-ford-jr-on-fomocos-way-forward-everything-still-on-the/">Bill Ford, Jr. on FoMoCo's Way Forward: everything still on the table</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/04/17/report-ford-still-considering-sale-or-partnership/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/bill-ford-jr-on-fomocos-way-forward-everything-still-on-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/876861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/bill-ford-jr-on-fomocos-way-forward-everything-still-on-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>mulally</category><category>portfolio</category><category>restructure</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Autoblog Podcast #63]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/autoblog-podcast-63/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/autoblog-podcast-63/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/autoblog-podcast-63/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/new-york-auto-show/" rel="tag">New York Auto Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suzuki/" rel="tag">Suzuki</a></p><img border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/new-ab-podcast_logo_200.jpg" />It's nice to be back in the swing of things. We're once again cranking out weekly podcasts, and #63 is a compact  one. We start off salivating over the news that the next generation <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/16/suzuki-swift-coming-to-the-u-s-in-2010/">Suzuki Swift </a>will be headed for US shores. We devolve from discussing an unsubstantiated rumor into wistful praise for the current <em>can't have it</em> Swift, and even make mention of Swifts from nigh on twenty years ago. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/12/mulally-apologizes-for-frenzy-over-bush-joke/">dustup</a> over Alan Mulally's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/alan-mulally-super-hero-ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/">work of fiction</a> at the New York Auto Show keynote draws our ire next. This one has it all, lies, grandstanding media with agendas, attacks, grandstanding media with agendas, misinformation, grandstanding media with agendas, disinformation, and finally, grandstanding media with agendas. Speaking of grandstanding, we nearly go as far as calling Lutz's bluff on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/10/lutz-sounds-the-alarm-gm-puts-rwd-drive-vehicles-on-hold/">announcement</a> that the hotly anticipated RWD cars from GM are on hold 'till regulators get their shizzle together. Whatevs. The entire GM turnaround is on hold? Not bloody likely. The consensus we come to is: Bad Lutz. So, turn on, tune in and peel out for our latest slice of podcast goodness.<br /><br /><a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s=http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=73331469&amp;s="><strong>SUBSCRIBE</strong></a> to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes<br /><a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/podcasts/auto20070416_0063.mp3"><strong>LISTEN</strong></a> to the show now<br /><a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml"><strong>ADD</strong></a> the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/autoblog-podcast-63/">Autoblog Podcast #63</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/autoblog-podcast-63/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/876779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/autoblog-podcast-63/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoblog</category><category>autoblog podcast</category><category>AutoblogPodcast</category><category>blogosphere</category><category>bush</category><category>delay</category><category>edge</category><category>electricity</category><category>explosion</category><category>ford</category><category>g8</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>george</category><category>gm</category><category>hold</category><category>hybrid</category><category>hydrogen</category><category>joke</category><category>kimmel</category><category>lutz</category><category>magazines</category><category>media</category><category>motor trend</category><category>MotorTrend</category><category>mulally</category><category>on hold</category><category>OnHold</category><category>platform</category><category>podcast</category><category>president</category><category>print</category><category>rwd</category><category>suzuki</category><category>swift</category><category>w</category><enclosure url="http://www.autoblog.com/podcasts/auto20070416_0063.mp3" length="15402" type="audio/mpeg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:07:00 EST</pubDate><itunes:subtitle>Autoblog Podcast #63</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Dan Roth</itunes:author><itunes:duration>32:05</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>autoblog, podcast, autoblog podcasts, suzuki, swift, mulally, kimmel, joke, bush, w, george, hybrid, white house, edge, gm, lutz, rwd, delay,</itunes:keywords></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford keeping Jaguar in the house: Mullaly says "We're 100 percent behind them"]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/11/ford-keeping-jaguar-in-the-house-mullaly-says-were-100-percen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/11/ford-keeping-jaguar-in-the-house-mullaly-says-were-100-percen/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/11/ford-keeping-jaguar-in-the-house-mullaly-says-were-100-percen/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/new-york-auto-show/" rel="tag">New York Auto Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a></p><p><a href="http://coolbrit.net/blog/2007/04/10/jaguars-future-secure-at-ford-motor-co/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/jaguar_c-xf.jpg" /></a>Plain and simple, Alan Mulally is keeping the cat in the house. While admitting that there is a ways to go in the Ford turnaround plan, he asserts that, unlike Aston Martin, Jaguar will remain in the stable, citing the fact that "Jaguar is on a really good plan" as the reason "why we're investing in them."</p>
<p>It's been really hard to get a solid bearing on the future of Ford's leaping feline. Mulally's Ford, which is clearly not afraid to make ruthless cuts, sold Aston just as it climbed into profitability and began unveiling stunning future models. Jaguar, however -- in spite of last year's recall of every 2006-2007 XJ, the marque's 62% drop in sales from 2002-2006, and a 26.8% drop in year-on-year sales up to now -- is envisioned as a high-end niche maker with high-end niche profits. Jaguar remains a critical darling, like a movie showered with awards but seen by only four people: the new XJ, XK and C-XF are awash in trophies, and the brand still wins quality and sales satisfaction surveys.</p>
<p>While the brand new XJ and the production XF can't come soon enough, if they don't come correct, it is hard to believe Mulally won't rid the PAG of its house pet.</p>
<p>[Source: The Car Connection]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/11/ford-keeping-jaguar-in-the-house-mullaly-says-were-100-percen/">Ford keeping Jaguar in the house: Mullaly says "We're 100 percent behind them"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Daily_Auto_News/Mulally_Turnaround_Jaguar_on_Track.S173.A12182.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/11/ford-keeping-jaguar-in-the-house-mullaly-says-were-100-percen/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/871706/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/11/ford-keeping-jaguar-in-the-house-mullaly-says-were-100-percen/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>jaguar</category><category>mulally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alan Mulally, super hero: Ford CEO saves President Bush's life]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/alan-mulally-super-hero-ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/alan-mulally-super-hero-ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/alan-mulally-super-hero-ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/73702610.jpg" /><br /><br />Allan Mulally has already lived a very successful life, having helped save American icon Boeing, then taking over the reigns as Ford Motor Company's Chief Executive Officer. Now he has added 'the guy that saved President Bush' to the list. Mr. Mulally used his media audience at the New York Auto Show to tell a pretty great story about his recent trip to the White House.<br /><br />Ford Motor wanted to give President Bush a first-hand look at their hydrogen electric plug-in hybrid, so the company arranged to have a demonstration of the uber-tech Ford Edge right from the White House lawn. When walking with the President towards the vehicle, Mulally noticed that the extension cord was placed to the rear of the car, where the Hydrogen fuel tank resides, instead of the side of the car. As Mulally saw the President approach the rear of the car, he decided that he should physically grab the president and "make sure he plugged into the electricity, not into the hydrogen."<br /><br />We obviously don't know for sure whether or not the leader of the free world would have stuck an electrified cord into the Edge's Darwin-hole, but we do think it was a damn good idea Mulally stepped in to make sure Mr. Bush did the right thing. We don't think Ford's green initiative would have been able to recover if the company's best and brightest technology fried the President. Then again, given the approval numbers of Mr. Bush... we kid, we kid.<br /><br />Thanks for the tip Chris!<br /><br />[Source: Detroit News via <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/08/ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/">Think Progress</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/alan-mulally-super-hero-ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/">Alan Mulally, super hero: Ford CEO saves President Bush's life</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070407/AUTO01/704070338/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/alan-mulally-super-hero-ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/869931/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/alan-mulally-super-hero-ford-ceo-saves-president-bushs-life/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bush</category><category>edge plug-in hybrid</category><category>EdgePlug-inHybrid</category><category>ford edge</category><category>Ford Motor Company</category><category>FordEdge</category><category>FordMotorCompany</category><category>hydrogen</category><category>Mulally</category><category>President Bush</category><category>PresidentBush</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mulally sees salvation in working with others]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/mulally-sees-salvation-in-working-with-others/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/mulally-sees-salvation-in-working-with-others/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/mulally-sees-salvation-in-working-with-others/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/mulally3.jpg" />Ford Motor Company CEO Alan Mulally wants Ford to succeed, and he'll do anything in his power to make sure it will happen. When he's not busy <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/mulally-makes-some-friends-sells-some-cars-at-dearborn-dealersh/">selling cars</a> at the local Ford dealership, Mulally has been occupied talking to other automakers regarding possible component and plant sharing. In an interview with Automotive News, Mulally singled out powertrain engineering and manufacturing as areas where collaboration makes sense (particularly if its going to save the company money) . </p>
<p>Ford already has a better track record with regard to inter-automaker component sharing than many other OEMs, as evidenced by extensive partnerships with Mazda and Volvo. It <em>does</em> help that Ford has controlling interests in both companies, but now Mulally and co. are looking beyond their own backyard. We like the fact that Mulally seems to be open to anything that can help Ford prosper, and his style and panache have already left a mark on the automaker. </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News (subscription req'd)]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/mulally-sees-salvation-in-working-with-others/">Mulally sees salvation in working with others</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070327/REG/70327021/1166/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/mulally-sees-salvation-in-working-with-others/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/861654/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/28/mulally-sees-salvation-in-working-with-others/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070327/REG/</category><category>mulally</category><category>partnerships</category><category>toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford's cost of recovery: Over $11 Billion for accelerated restructuring]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/02/fords-cost-of-recovery-over-11-billion-for-accelerated-restru/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/02/fords-cost-of-recovery-over-11-billion-for-accelerated-restru/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/02/fords-cost-of-recovery-over-11-billion-for-accelerated-restru/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070301/REG/70228059/1165/OEM&amp;refsect=OEM"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/fordlogo.jpg"  alt="" /></a>In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that surfaced yesterday, Ford estimated that it the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/15/ford-s-accelerated-way-forward-plan-details-announced/">accelerated restructuring plan</a> announced last September will cost $11.2 billion when the books are finally balanced. In other words, it will cost Ford$11.2 billion to let go of 38,000 hourly and 10,000 salaried workers. The estimate includes ongoing costs for health care for any workers that didn't take the lump-sum buyout. Who knew it was that expensive to reduce your workforce?<br /> </p>
<p>If there is any good news here, it's that Ford has already accounted for $10 billion of that cost in 2006. The rest of the associated costs of the restructuring plan will be billed to the first quarter of 2007. Nothing like pulling the Band-Aid off quickly.</p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News - sub. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/02/fords-cost-of-recovery-over-11-billion-for-accelerated-restru/">Ford's cost of recovery: Over $11 Billion for accelerated restructuring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070301/REG/70228059/1165/OEM&amp;refsect=OEM>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/02/fords-cost-of-recovery-over-11-billion-for-accelerated-restru/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/844612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/02/fords-cost-of-recovery-over-11-billion-for-accelerated-restru/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fields</category><category>ford</category><category>mulally</category><category>restructuring</category><category>way forward</category><category>WayForward</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:54:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>