<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[2014 Chevrolet Cruze Diesel gets 46 mpg]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel/"><img alt="2014 Chevrolet Cruze Diesel" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2014-cruze-clean-turbo-diesel-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 419px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general motors/">General Motors</a> has announced the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze/">2014 Chevrolet Cruze Diesel</a> will return 46 miles per gallon highway based on Environmental Protection Agency estimates, besting original projections by some 4 mpg. As GM points out, the figure is better than "any non-hybrid passenger car in America," including the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/passat/">Volkswagen Passat TDI</a> at 43 mpg and the Volkswagen Jetta TDI at 42 mpg. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/prius/">Toyota Prius</a>, meanwhile, still bests the Cruze Diesel thanks to the hybrid's 48 mpg highway rating.<br />
<br />
Still, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> should be proud of its four-door. The car's turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine delivers 148 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque, bolted to a six-speed automatic transmission. Drivers will also enjoy an overboost function that can crank the engine to 280 lb-ft of torque for brief stints. This all means that the Cruze will be able to travel 700 miles on a single tank of fuel, while achieving a 0-60 time of 8.6 seconds. You can check out the <a href="/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/#continued">full press release below</a> for more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2014 Chevrolet Cruze Diesel gets 46 mpg</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/">2014 Chevrolet Cruze Diesel gets 46 mpg</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20544597/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2014 chevy cruze diesel</category><category>chevy cruze</category><category>chevy cruze diesel</category><category>environmental protection agency</category><category>epa</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:14:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20544597/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/18/2014-chevrolet-cruze-diesel-gets-46-mpg/20544597/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20544597</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2014-cruze-clean-turbo-diesel-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford to show special edition Raptor on April 9]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/off-road/" rel="tag">Off-Road</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-f-150-raptor/#photo-5709316"><img alt="2013 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor SuperCrew - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/fordsupercrewraptor.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 419px;" /></a><br />
<br />
There are precious few details, but what we do know is that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> will be revealing images of "appearance upgrades" for a special-edition <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150+svt+raptor/">2014 F-150 SVT Raptor</a> on April 9. The slideshow will happen during a Motor Press Guild luncheon at Ford's Design Center Showroom in Irvine, California.<br />
<br />
Without photos or further details, we're left to wonder about the extent of these changes, but aren't expecting anything too significant given the venue. Ford is understood to be revealing a next-generation <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150/">F-150</a> with a big weight loss - <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/27/will-ford-turn-to-aluminum-for-body-of-next-f-150-maybe/">as much as 700 pounds</a> - for 2014, though it isn't yet clear if that's the truck's model year or simply its on-sale year. For at least a couple of years, Ford forums have been <a href="http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f162/2014-f-150-redesign-15010/">suggesting changes will come</a> with the 2014 Raptor, so there could still be a bigger surprise in store. Either way, we'll know what all this means in a little more than a week. The press release <a href="/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/#continued">below</a> has the official details, but for the moment, we'll content ourselves by ogling the 2013 model above.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford to show special edition Raptor on April 9</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/">Ford to show special edition Raptor on April 9</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20524780/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2014 ford f-150 svt raptor</category><category>2014 ford raptor</category><category>design center</category><category>f-150 svt raptor</category><category>ford</category><category>ford design center</category><category>ford f-150 svt raptor</category><category>ford raptor</category><category>motor press guild</category><category>mpg</category><category>raptor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20524780/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/01/ford-to-show-special-edition-raptor-on-april-9/20524780/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20524780</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/fordsupercrewraptor_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai, <i>Los Angeles Times</i> and <i>Consumer Reports</i> in fuel economy skirmish?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hyundai-consumer-reports-fuel-economy-vs-epa-data-chart/full/"><img alt="Hyundai chart showing Consumer Reports vs. EPA fuel economy data" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/hyundai-cr-mpg-chart-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 472px;" /></a><br />
<br />
On Wednesday, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/"><em>Consumer Reports</em> issued a story</a> taking umbrage with the auto industry's move toward smaller, turbocharged engines, noting its own testing revealed that many such powerplants fail to deliver their promised fuel economy numbers. The story covered a variety of domestic and foreign automakers, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> featuring prominently in the discussion. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai">Hyundai</a> was also mentioned for its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/sonata/">Sonata Turbo</a>, but the Korean automaker's family sedan came within one observed mile per gallon of its EPA ratings in CR's test, and its normally aspirated 2.4-liter counterpart actually beat its combined EPA ratings, 27 mpg to 26.<br />
<br />
Good news for Hyundai, right? The automaker was so pleased with its report card that it sent out a small statement to a handful of news outlets including <em>Autoblog</em>, reading in part:<br />
<blockquote>
	<p>
		"We at Hyundai believe that <em>Consumer Reports</em> real-world average fuel economy testing results and EPA combined fuel economy results should correlate, and in fact do correlate nicely for some brands. Among all brands, Hyundai does particularly well in this correlation, with no high-volume brand having a better correlation between EPA combined and <em>Consumer Reports</em> real-world fuel economy."</p>
</blockquote>
Garden-variety PR stuff to this point, but here's where the issue <a href="http://autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/#continued">gets more complicated</a>...<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyundai, <i>Los Angeles Times</i> and <i>Consumer Reports</i> in fuel economy skirmish?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/">Hyundai, <i>Los Angeles Times</i> and <i>Consumer Reports</i> in fuel economy skirmish?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20451506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer reports</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel economy ratings</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai consumer reports</category><category>hyundai epa</category><category>hyundai fuel economy</category><category>hyundai mpg</category><category>hyundaiconsumerreports</category><category>hyundaiepa</category><category>hyundaifueleconomy</category><category>hyundaimpg</category><category>los angeles times</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20451506/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/20451506/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20451506</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/hyundai-cr-mpg-chart-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai and Kia set aside $412 million for false mileage claims]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/25/hyundai-and-kia-set-aside-412-million-for-false-mileage-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/25/hyundai-and-kia-set-aside-412-million-for-false-mileage-claims/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/25/hyundai-and-kia-set-aside-412-million-for-false-mileage-claims/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130125/OEM/130129931/kia-motors-earmarks-187-million-in-costs-on-false-u-s-mileage-claims"><img height="197" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/hyundai-kia-logos.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
We still don't know how the whole <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/">fuel economy ratings debacle</a> is going to play out for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/">Kia</a>, but both automakers are preparing to make good on their promises to reimburse vehicle owners for lower-than-promised mileage figures. According to <em>Automotive News</em>, Hyundai and Kia have set aside a combined total of $412 million ($225 million for Hyundai and $187 million for Kia) as compensation, which will be sent out on a case-by-case basis via debit cards depending on the vehicle and the mileage driven.<br />
<br />
Announced back in November, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/">exaggerated miles per gallon claims</a> affect around 900,000 Kia and Hyundai products produced for the 2011 through 2013 model years sold in the US and Canada. This whole deal has had plenty of action ranging from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/17/did-a-us-automaker-blow-the-whistle-on-hyundai-kia-fuel-economy/">suspected whistleblowing from a rival US automaker</a> and even <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/21/insider-trading-ahead-of-hyundai-kia-mpg-debacle-suspected/">insider trading</a>, but it has probably been most frustrating for vehicle owners who, in most cases, saw their vehicles' city and highway ratings drop between one and three digits.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/25/hyundai-and-kia-set-aside-412-million-for-false-mileage-claims/">Hyundai and Kia set aside $412 million for false mileage claims</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/25/hyundai-and-kia-set-aside-412-million-for-false-mileage-claims/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20438914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/25/hyundai-and-kia-set-aside-412-million-for-false-mileage-claims/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fuel economy</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai fuel economy</category><category>kia</category><category>kia fuel economy</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20438914/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/25/hyundai-and-kia-set-aside-412-million-for-false-mileage-claims/20438914/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20438914</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/hyundai-kia-logos_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i> calls out Ford for false Fusion, C-Max hybrid fuel economy claims]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#continued"><img height="351" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/crvideo.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<em>Consumer Reports</em> is calling out <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a>, saying the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/c-max">C-Max</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion">Fusion</a> hybrids don't get anywhere near the 47 miles per gallon the automaker claims.<br />
<br />
Several automakers have faced backlash after consumers discovered their cars don't quite hit the lofty fuel economy figures promised by the companies, and Ford may be the newest casualty of all this pesky fact-checking by critics and watchdogs.<br />
<br />
The magazine drove the cars 2,000 miles and consistently got around 39 mpg for the Fusion and 37 mpg for the C-Max. Jake Fisher, director of auto testing for <em>Consumer Reports</em>, said this is the largest discrepancy between what automakers MPG claims and the actual real-world driving results.<br />
<br />
"It's not to say these are bad cars at all; they still get excellent fuel economy," Fisher said. "But we've been doing this for a long time, and we've never seen such a difference between the EPA estimates and our numbers."<br />
<br />
Ford said its figures were certified by the EPA, but the EPA only tests about 10 to 15 percent of the cars on the road. Ford said some early reports from customers showed the cars getting even better fuel economy than 47 mpg.<br />
<br />
"This reinforces the fact that driving styles, driving conditions, and other factors can cause mileage to vary," said Wes Sherwood, a spokesman for Ford. For customers who want to optimize their fuel economy, the cars come with different driving coach software to help drivers get better fuel economy, he said.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#continued">Scroll down</a> to watch the video report from <em>Consumer Reports</em>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i> calls out Ford for false Fusion, C-Max hybrid fuel economy claims</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/"><i>Consumer Reports</i> calls out Ford for false Fusion, C-Max hybrid fuel economy claims</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20396331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 ford c-max hybrid</category><category>2013 ford fusion hybrid</category><category>c-max</category><category>c-max hybrid</category><category>cmax</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ford</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fusion</category><category>fusion hybrid</category><category>mpg</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon Silke Carty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20396331/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/20396331/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20396331</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/crvideo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Senator calling for answers from Hyundai and Kia over MPG debacle]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-kia-rio-sedan/"><img alt="2012 Kia Rio sedan - front three-quarter view, white" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/kia-rio-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 395px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/">Kia</a> have already gone public with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/krafcik-90-of-hyundai-owners-satisfied-with-reimbursement-prog/">plans to make good on the inflated fuel economy claims scandal</a> that has rocked both companies in recent weeks. But one US senator, Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), is skeptical that the general public will see much good from the proposal, and he's looking for answers.<br />
<br />
To recap: Hyundai/Kia have agreed to compensate owners of 900,000 affected vehicles for real versus previously claimed fuel mileage (as well as adding in a <strike>one</strike>- <em>fifteen</em>-percent premium), by way of pre-loaded debit cards. It has been speculated that this payout could crest $100 million by the time the Korean automakers are done writing checks.<br />
<br />
Said Rockefeller to <em>The Detroit News</em>, "While I believe this is a positive step, I am concerned that many affected customers may not learn about the program or may find it burdensome to participate in the program." Rockefeller would reportedly like to see a monitoring system for the paybacks more clearly defined, with the goal being as many <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/">wronged car buyers</a> as possible getting the recompense that they're due.<br />
<br />
For its part, the EPA is continuing its probe into the matter, and the government agency could yet pursue civil penalties against the automakers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/">Senator calling for answers from Hyundai and Kia over MPG debacle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20391799/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fuel economy</category><category>hyundai</category><category>jay rockefeller</category><category>kia</category><category>mpg</category><category>mpg scandal</category><category>rio</category><category>us senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seyth Miersma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:16:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20391799/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/20391799/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20391799</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/kia-rio-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New car shoppers less willing to consider Hyundai, Kia after mileage overstatement]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-kia-soul-base-1-6l-eco-review/"><img alt="2012 Kia Soul base model with bridge" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/2012-kia-soul-base-eco---01-opt.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 419px; " /></a><br />
<br />
Summarizing the results of research carried out by <em>Edmunds</em>, <em>Reuters</em> reports that consumers' are less inclined to purchase cars from <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/kia">Kia</a> due to the company's recent snafu over inflated mileage claims. The <em>Edmunds</em> metric of "purchase intent" declined by 1.9 percent for the <a href="http://autoblog.com/kia/soul">Kia Soul</a> (pictured), meaning that the largest drop in consideration coincided with the model that suffered the biggest drop in mileage ratings. Consideration dropped .4 percent for the <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai/elantra">Hyundai Elantra</a>, and purchasing intent also fell for the <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai/accent">Hyundai Accent</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai/veloster">Veloster</a>, as well as the <a href="http://autoblog.com/kia/rio">Kia Rio</a>.<br />
<br />
An <em>Edmunds </em>analyst thinks the brouhaha could affect "<span id="articleText">future business as this development may have a direct impact on Hyundai's credibility with some U.S. buyers," and Moody's Investment Service figures </span><span id="articleText"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/">compensating buyers</a> might cost "$100 million a year until the cars are scrapped" </span>- and that cost doesn't include <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/05/act-surprised-hyundai-kia-sued-over-inflated-fuel-mileage-rati/">potential damages from lawsuits</a>. But in the "we all have opinions" column, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/06/will-fallout-from-hyundai-and-kias-mpg-issues-hurt-resale-value/">other analysts don't believe</a> there won't be any serious long-term fallout from the mileage mistatements. Remember, it was only two years ago that <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota">Toyota</a> was being frogmarched across the nation to be pilloried in Washington, D.C. for what is arguably a much more grievous offense, and woe was all the rage when describing Toyota's plight. And now? It's ranked among the best global brands in 2012 and appears poised to retake the title of world's largest automaker.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/">New car shoppers less willing to consider Hyundai, Kia after mileage overstatement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20386808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accent</category><category>elantra</category><category>environmental protection agency</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy claims</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai fuel economy</category><category>kia</category><category>mpg</category><category>soul</category><category>veloster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20386808/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/20386808/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20386808</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/2012-kia-soul-base-eco---01-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Hyundai's MPG malfunction give ground to Honda?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/19/will-hyundais-mpg-malfunction-give-ground-to-honda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/19/will-hyundais-mpg-malfunction-give-ground-to-honda/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/19/will-hyundais-mpg-malfunction-give-ground-to-honda/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a></p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-16/hyundai-fuel-economy-flap-seen-as-turned-tables-for-honda.html"><img alt="Hyundai sign with shadowy figure" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/hyundai-sign-with-shadowy-figure.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 433px; " /></a><br />
<br />
One man's loss is another man's gain. The same notion can be applied to the automotive marketplace, where bad press for one brand presents an opportune time to capitalize for another. A new <i>Bloomberg </i>puts forth a potential automotive example of this - fallout stemming from the recent <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia">Kia</a> fuel economy debacle. The Korean automakers were recently marred for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/">incorrectly calculating their fuel economy data</a>, resulting in the downward adjustment of the fuel economy figures for many of their most popular models.<br />
<br />
While this represents a setback for Kia and Hyundai, brands like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> are looking to gain ground on the two Korean marques, which have been catching up to Japan's volume automakers thanks to their radically improved lineups.<br />
<br />
In 2010, Hyundai began touting its lineup as the most fuel-efficient in America. This stirred emotions at Honda, a brand that had been the nation's top performer in fuel economy for 33 years. With this recent adjustment by Hyundai, Honda is evidently hoping to wear the fuel efficiency crown once again.<br />
<br />
According to the report, the Korean automakers' errors came in the EPA's "coastdown" test, in which a test car is driven to 80 mph, put in neutral and "coasted" to 9 mph. Hyundai admits this part of the test was not performed correctly. According to Sung Hwan Cho, president of Hyundai's US technical center, "These were just honest procedure errors in a very complex testing process."<br />
<br />
Adding to Honda's opportunity is the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/12/honda-debuts-honed-2013-civic/">recently previewed</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic/">2013 Honda Civic</a>, set to go on sale the same day it is revealed at this month's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/la-auto-show/">LA Motor Show</a>. The 2012 model came in for harsh criticism from the automotive press, though the model's sales proved largely unaffected by the controversy. Industry analysts suggest that Honda's new (and presumably improved) 2013 Civic should put the automaker in prime position to reclaim both consumer mindshare and the industry's MPG crown.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/19/will-hyundais-mpg-malfunction-give-ground-to-honda/">Will Hyundai's MPG malfunction give ground to Honda?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/19/will-hyundais-mpg-malfunction-give-ground-to-honda/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20381768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/19/will-hyundais-mpg-malfunction-give-ground-to-honda/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 honda civic</category><category>civic</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>honda</category><category>hyundai</category><category>kia</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[George Kennedy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20381768/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/19/will-hyundais-mpg-malfunction-give-ground-to-honda/20381768/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20381768</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/hyundai-sign-with-shadowy-figure_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai, Kia admit exaggerated mileage claims, will compensate owners [UPDATE]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121102/AUTO0104/211020372/1148/rss25"><img alt="Hyundai Accent" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/hyundai-accent-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; width: 628px; margin-bottom: 4px; height: 417px" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hyundai-and-kia-adjusted-epa-fuel-economy-estimates/"><img alt="Hyundai and Kia adjusted EPA Fuel Economy Estimates" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/hyundai-fe-1-250.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; width: 250px; margin-bottom: 4px; float: right; height: 287px" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia">Kia</a> are lowering the fuel economy estimates on a majority of 2012 and 2013 models. <em>The Detroit News</em> reports a probe by the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/environmental protection agency">Environmental Protection Agency</a> has found both manufacturers guilty of posting false fuel economy estimates on vehicle window stickers since late 2010. The companies will spend millions of dollars compensating the owners of some 900,000 vehicles sold under the claims. This marks the largest spate of fuel economy reductions in the history of the automotive industry. Prior to this probe, only two vehicles have seen their window sticker fuel economy values reduced since 2000.<br />
<br />
Hyundai aggressively advertised the fact that the brand offers four models that boast 40 mpg, but that claim is no longer true. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/accent">2013 Hyundai Accent</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/veloster">Veloster</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/elantra">Elantra</a> will now see their EPA estimates fall to either 37 or 38 miles per gallon on the highway. The report quotes Hyundai CEO John Krafcik as saying, "We're extremely sorry about these errors" and blamed "procedural errors" in the company's fuel economy testing as the reason behind the discrepancy.<br />
<br />
All told, 35 percent of 2011-2013 models sold through October will see a reduction. Of those, 580,000 will see a drop of around 1 mpg, while 240,000 units will have their EPA figures cut by 2 mpg. The remaining 80,000 will drop by 3 to 4 mpg. Owners will be compensated based on their vehicles' odometer readings, and both automakers will contribute an additional 15 percent over the dollar value. The funds will be awarded via prepaid debit cards. For an owner who drove 15,000 miles, an adjustment of 1 mpg would result in a refund of around $88.<br />
<br />
For some time there has been suspicion that the Korean automakers' fuel economy claims were too optimistic, which most recently led to a <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/07/10/hyundai-elantra-subject-of-class-action-lawsuit-for-misleading/">class-action lawsuit filed in July</a> of this year by an organization called Consumer Watchdog on behalf of Elantra owner Louis Bird of California.<br />
<br />
The EPA and Hyundai have issued press releases on the new situation, which you can read <a href="/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/#continued">below</a>. You may also view the full model breakdown in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hyundai-and-kia-adjusted-epa-fuel-economy-estimates/">gallery below</a>.<br />
<br />
<strong>UPDATE:</strong> <em>On a media conference call, Hyundai and Kia attributed the discrepancies to "honest mistakes" and "human error" during in-house fuel economy evaluations. Additional steps were added to the evaluation process in an attempt to ensure accuracy, which ultimately caused the higher-than-EPA figures. Both companies stress there was no intentional effort made to deceive either the federal government or consumers. There's no indication as to how much the apology campaign will cost, though Hyundai and Kia both plan to roll out extensive advertising campaigns to alert consumers of the issue.</em><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyundai, Kia admit exaggerated mileage claims, will compensate owners [UPDATE]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/">Hyundai, Kia admit exaggerated mileage claims, will compensate owners [UPDATE]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20368750/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>environmental protection agency</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy claims</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai fuel economy</category><category>hyundai fuel economy claims</category><category>hyundai+fuel+economy+lawsuit</category><category>hyundai+mileage</category><category>hyundai+mileage+refund</category><category>hyundaifueleconomylawsuit</category><category>hyundaimileage</category><category>hyundaimileagerefund</category><category>kia</category><category>kia fuel economy</category><category>kia+mpg+compensation</category><category>kiampgcompensation</category><category>mpg</category><category>mpg claims</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20368750/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/20368750/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20368750</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/hyundai-accent-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lincoln MKZ Hybrid rated at 45 mpg, below 47-mpg Fusion Hybrid]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-lincoln-mkz-new-york-2012/" target="_blank"><img alt="2013 Lincoln MKZ" class="post_top_img" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/2013-lincoln-mkz-ny.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Just how important are all the luxury touches of a <a href="http://autoblog.com/lincoln">Lincoln</a> compared to a <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a>? They'd better be worth a two-miles-per-gallon penalty, since that's what buyers will be hit with if they choose the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mkz/">MKZ Hybrid</a> over the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/">47-mpg</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion">Fusion Hybrid</a>. Ford announced today that the MKZ Hybrid has been certified by the EPA to get 45 mpg in the city, 45 mpg on the highway and 45 mpg combined.<br />
<br />
Granted, 45 mpg does put the MKZ into the top-of-its-class fuel economy range, beating the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/es/">Lexus ES Hybrid</a> by five mpg combined and delivering "more miles per gallon than any luxury vehicle in America." The MKZ Hybrid is also available <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/07/23/2013-lincoln-mkz-configurator-comes-alive-hybrid-option-at-no-e/">for the same price as the non-hybrid model</a>. The more efficient 2.0-liter, four-cylinder automatic MKZ gets 26 combined mpg, 22 in the city and 33 on the highway. The MKZ Hybrid will go on sale later this year and the press release is available <a href="/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lincoln MKZ Hybrid rated at 45 mpg, below 47-mpg Fusion Hybrid</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/">Lincoln MKZ Hybrid rated at 45 mpg, below 47-mpg Fusion Hybrid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20350382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 lincoln mkz hybrid</category><category>2013 lincoln mkz hybrid mpg</category><category>ford fusion hybrid</category><category>mkz mpg</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian Blanco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20350382/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/10/16/lincoln-mkz-hybrid-rated-at-45-mpg-below-47-mpg-fusion-hybrid/20350382/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20350382</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/2013-lincoln-mkz-ny_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2013 Ford Fusion rated at 25/37 MPG, Hybrid gets 47 MPG]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-fusion-1/#photo-4724235"><img height="399" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/09/04-2013-ford-fusion-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The EPA posted fuel economy numbers for the 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion">Ford Fusion</a> in front-wheel-drive, all-wheel-drive and hybrid flavors, but they were quickly removed from certain parts of the FuelEconomy.gov website. <em>Car and Driver</em> snagged the numbers before they disappeared, however, and it makes for fine reading.<br />
<br />
It's a toss-up nowadays as to whether an automatic or manual will get the ultimate economy, but the best numbers among the conventional Fusion powertrains are the 25 city / 37 highway miles per gallon returned by the six-speed-manual-equipped FWD Fusion with the 179-horsepower 1.6-liter EcoBoost motor. Numbers for the six-speed automatic are right behind, at 23 city / 36 highway.<br />
<br />
Dropping nine horsepower and a turbocharger will get you price but not efficiency gains, with the 170-hp naturally-aspirated 2.5-liter four doing 22 city / 34 hwy. In the other direction, that's one small mpg away from the 22 hwy / 33 city to be had by the 237-hp 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder. Add all-wheel drive to the equation and pay a 2-mpg penalty, with the 237-hp motor doing 22 city / 31 hwy when turning all four wheels.<br />
<br />
Of course the hybrid Fusion killed it, getting 47 city and 47 hwy. That is only bested by the 2012 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/prius+c">Toyota Prius C</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/prius">Prius</a>, ties the 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/c-max">Ford C-Max Hybrid</a> and beats the 2012 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic">Honda Civic</a> Hybrid. Among its competitors, the Fusion is in the mosh pit with the 2012 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/camry">Toyota Camry</a>'s 25 city / 35 hwy, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/accord">Honda Accord</a>'s 27 city / 37 hwy and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/malibu">Chevrolet Malibu</a>'s 22 city / 34 hwy, with just the sedan-surfing <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/altima">Nissan Altima</a> jumping out at 27 city / 38 hwy.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/">2013 Ford Fusion rated at 25/37 MPG, Hybrid gets 47 MPG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20315075/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 ford fusion</category><category>accord</category><category>altima</category><category>camry</category><category>epa</category><category>ford</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fusion</category><category>fusion fuel efficiency</category><category>fusion mpg</category><category>honda</category><category>mpg</category><category>nissan</category><category>toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:14:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20315075/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/09/07/2013-ford-fusion-rated-at-25-37-mpg-hybrid-gets-47-mpg/20315075/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20315075</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/09/04-2013-ford-fusion-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New CAFE rules officially finalized; 54.5 mpg is like making gas $1/gallon cheaper]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="/2012/08/28/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/#continued"><img alt="Sixties Ford model being refueled" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/refueling-old-ford.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 425px; " /></a><br />
<br />
Increasing the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards for model year 2017-2025 cars to 54.5 miles per gallon was <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/29/2025-cafe-target-set-at-54-5-mpg-everyones-apparently-happy-wi/">first proposed</a> in July 2011. Since then, there has been a lot of back and forth, a lot of <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/01/18/first-hearing-on-54-5-mpg-proposal-reveals-widespread-support/">positive</a> and <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/08/15/54-5-mpg-fuel-rule-negotiations-were-not-harmonious/">negative</a> responses, and, lately, <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/08/16/54-5-mpg-cafe-rule-delayed-review/">a delay for unknown reasons</a>. Since the CAFE rules were not changed between the mid-1980s and when President Obama came into office and rules for 2012-2016 model year vehicles were put in place in 2010, it's not a huge surprise this update took so long. That's all over now.<br />
<br />
Department of Transportation secretary <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ray+lahood/">Ray LaHood</a> and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lisa Jackson announced the official finalization of new federal fuel efficiency standards in a Tuesday conference call. Some headline numbers from the call:<br />
<ul>
	<li>
		The reduced fuel use will save American families over $1.7 trillion dollars in fuel costs.</li>
	<li>
		Vehicles on American roads will use two million barrels of oil less per day by 2025, "as much as half of the oil we import from OPEC each day."</li>
	<li>
		More efficient cars will be more expensive, but LaHood said that the buyers can expect average fuel savings of $8,000 per vehicle (over the life of the vehicle) for a 2025 model year car compared to a similar vehicle from 2010, using today's prices. That's equivalent to gas being a dollar a gallon cheaper.</li>
	<li>
		You like lower emissions? The new standards will "reduc[e] emissions by 6 billion metric tons over the life of the program - more than the total amount of carbon dioxide emitted by the United States in 2010."</li>
</ul>
We've heard a lot of those numbers before, but there were some items in the press release (not addressed on the call) that caught our eye. Specifically:<br />
<blockquote>
	<p>
		<em>The program also includes targeted incentives to encourage early adoption and introduction into the marketplace of advanced technologies to dramatically improve vehicle performance, including:<br />
		Incentives for electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and fuel cells vehicles;<br />
		Incentives for hybrid technologies for large pickups and for other technologies that achieve high fuel economy levels on large pickups;<br />
		Incentives for natural gas vehicles;<br />
		Credits for technologies with potential to achieve real-world greenhouse gas reductions and fuel economy improvements that are not captured by the standards test procedures.</em></p>
</blockquote>
We don't know how these incentives stack (or don't) with current incentives or if they're just the ones already in place, but we've put in a call to the EPA to find out. We'll let you know when we hear back. A sample of early responses to the official rules - all positive, so far - is available <a href="/2012/08/28/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New CAFE rules officially finalized; 54.5 mpg is like making gas $1/gallon cheaper</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/">New CAFE rules officially finalized; 54.5 mpg is like making gas $1/gallon cheaper</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20311901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cafe</category><category>cafe standards</category><category>corporate average fuel economy</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>lisa jackson</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>mpg</category><category>obama</category><category>ray lahood</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian Blanco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20311901/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/08/29/new-cafe-rules-officially-finalized-54-5-mpg-is-like-making-gas/20311901/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20311901</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/refueling-old-ford_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2013 Buick Encore snags 25 mpg city, 33 mpg highway EPA ratings]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-buick-encore/"><img height="450" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/buick-encore-628.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/gm/">General Motors</a> has announced that its all-new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/encore/">2013 Buick Encore</a> subcompact crossover achieves 25 miles per gallon in city driving and 33 mpg on the highway (28 mpg combined) in front-wheel drive spec.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/">Buick</a> points to the combination of a body architecture that is 60 percent high-strength steel and a 1.4-liter turbocharged four backed by a six-speed automatic as the foundation of a lightweight, fuel-efficient vehicle.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> says that compared to the average new vehicle, an Encore owner will spend an estimated $2,100 less in fuel expenditures over the next five years - an average of $420 per year. The company claims the petite crossover's estimated fuel cost of $1,900 per year is the lowest of any 2013 model year crossover sold in the States.<br />
<br />
Fuel economy estimates for the all-wheel drive Encore have not yet been announced and will be revealed at a later date. Check out the press release from Buick <a href="/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/#continued">below</a> for more information on the Encore and its fuel economy numbers.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2013 Buick Encore snags 25 mpg city, 33 mpg highway EPA ratings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/">2013 Buick Encore snags 25 mpg city, 33 mpg highway EPA ratings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20310865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 buick encore</category><category>buick</category><category>compact</category><category>crossover</category><category>encore</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel efficient</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[George Kennedy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20310865/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/08/28/2013-buick-encore-snags-25-mpg-city-33-mpg-highway-epa-ratings/20310865/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20310865</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/buick-encore-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[House Republicans urge White House to delay 2017-2025 fuel economy standards]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/22/house-republicans-urge-white-house-to-delay-2017-2025-fuel-econo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/22/house-republicans-urge-white-house-to-delay-2017-2025-fuel-econo/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/22/house-republicans-urge-white-house-to-delay-2017-2025-fuel-econo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120821/AUTO01/208210411/1148/rss25"><img height="458" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/rep-darrell-issa.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Representatives from the Republican Party have asked President Obama to delay pushing through strict new automotive fuel economy regulations. The trio of top GOP legislators consists of auto dealer Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania, Jim Jordan (also of PA) and House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/25/gm-ceo-stands-up-for-chevy-volt-in-dc-hearing-issa-tells-nhtsa/">Darrell Issa</a> of California (pictured). The three legislators are calling for further review of the 2017-2025 Corporate Average Fuel Economy targets. According to a report by <em>The Detroit News</em>, Issa says "Higher fuel efficiency standards is a goal I share - but not at the expense of consumer safety."<br />
<br />
As the report notes, a deal was struck last summer that would actually lower fuel economy increases from 2017-2021 of 3.5 percent annually for light trucks and five percent every year for cars. Part of this pact stipulated a mid-term review to confirm that reaching these goals was even possible.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">The National High Traffic Safety Administration</a>, along with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/epa/">Environmental Protection Agency</a> decided not to meet a self-imposed Wednesday deadline for finalization of the new rules. NHTSA head <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/David+Strickland/">David Strickland</a> has said that the new regulations will be announced in "days, not weeks," while one House Republican has suggested that the White House may be having misgivings about pushing the legislation through now.<br />
<br />
It is said that the new standards will cost the auto industry $157.3 billion, but could eventually result in $1.7 trillion in savings for consumers on fuel expenditures. Unfortunately, the new standards could also mean an additional $2,000 to the price of the average automobile by 2025. According to Representative Kelly, "the new CAFE standards will limit choice, compromise safety, and increase costs to millions of Americans..."<br />
<br />
The issue may be out of their control, however, as <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ray+lahood/">Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood</a> noted in a recent interview that the legislation is "... coming soon. We're working with the White House and the EPA to roll it out."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/22/house-republicans-urge-white-house-to-delay-2017-2025-fuel-econo/">House Republicans urge White House to delay 2017-2025 fuel economy standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/22/house-republicans-urge-white-house-to-delay-2017-2025-fuel-econo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20306437/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/22/house-republicans-urge-white-house-to-delay-2017-2025-fuel-econo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cafe</category><category>cafe standards</category><category>carb</category><category>corporate average fuel economy</category><category>darrell issa</category><category>david strickland</category><category>epa</category><category>epa regulations</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>jim jordan</category><category>mike kelly</category><category>mpg</category><category>ray lahood</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[George Kennedy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20306437/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/08/22/house-republicans-urge-white-house-to-delay-2017-2025-fuel-econo/20306437/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20306437</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/rep-darrell-issa_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Honda Accord, Fit and Pilot to receive Dreamy new engines, CVTs]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/01/honda-accord-fit-and-pilot-to-receive-new-engines-cvts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/01/honda-accord-fit-and-pilot-to-receive-new-engines-cvts/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/01/honda-accord-fit-and-pilot-to-receive-new-engines-cvts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a></p><p class="p1">
	<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-honda-accord-spy-photos/"><img alt="2013 Honda Accord prototype - camouflaged front 3/4 view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/2013-honda-accord-spy-photos-001-1338410609.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 420px; " /></a></p>
<p class="p2">
	<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> is set to unveil its new "Earth Dreams" family of engines, and while the lineup will make its debut in the all-new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/accord/">Accord</a>, the more efficient powertrains are poised to spread throughout the lineup.</p>
<p class="p2">
	According to an <em>Automotive News</em> report, the direct-injected, dual overhead cam powerplant range is said to be good for a 10-percent increase in fuel economy over the current lineup.</p>
<p class="p2">
	Also mentioned in the story is the possibility of getting a 1.6-liter diesel with 220 pound feet of torque here in the States, and possibly a large-car hybrid setup. Will Honda renew the short-lived Accord Hybrid?<br />
	<br />
	The report is not limited to engine technology, as <em>Automotive News</em> says Honda will move to Continuously Variable Transmissions in a much larger way. We've known for some time that the Japanese automaker is poised to go the belt and pulley route, but it hasn't been clear what vehicles will receive the transmission. Not every vehicle will get a CVT, as the report states that "performance models and off-road vehicles will retain geared transmissions."</p>
<p class="p2">
	<em>AN</em> also provided a breakdown of future product plans, which include a redesigned <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/fit/">Fit</a> in summer of 2014, with a 1.5-liter four-cylinder paired with a CVT. Europe will get a hybrid Fit, but American plans for the hybrid version have reportedly been nixed. Honda's smallest offering, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/18/honda-may-build-cuv-based-on-next-fit/">may also spawn a compact crossover</a>, slotted below the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/cr-v/">CR-V</a>, but it's not expected until Spring, 2015.<br />
	<br />
	In other portfolio news, the aging <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/pilot/">Pilot</a> three-row crossover will receive a new 3.5-liter Earth Dreams V6 when the model is redesigned for 2014. Power is expected to be on the order of 310 horsepower and 265 pound-feet of torque, and a CVT is also part of the program, but only on front-drive models. Also included is additional confirmation that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic/">Civic</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/31/honda-moving-up-mid-cycle-refresh-of-civic-amidst-criticism/">will get an emergency refresh</a>, a mere 18 months after its launch triggered a lackluster response from critics.</p>
<p class="p2">
	Finally, the AN report also dangles the possibility of reviving the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/s2000/">S2000</a> to compete with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/fr-s/">Scion FR-S</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/brz">Subaru BRZ</a>, but then dashes hopes by saying that its not a priority for the Japanese automaker.</p>
<p class="p1">
</p>
<p class="p1">
</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/01/honda-accord-fit-and-pilot-to-receive-new-engines-cvts/">Honda Accord, Fit and Pilot to receive Dreamy new engines, CVTs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/01/honda-accord-fit-and-pilot-to-receive-new-engines-cvts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20290728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/01/honda-accord-fit-and-pilot-to-receive-new-engines-cvts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accord</category><category>civic</category><category>cr-v</category><category>cr-z</category><category>cvt</category><category>earth dreams</category><category>fit</category><category>honda</category><category>hybrid</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[George Kennedy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20290728/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/08/01/honda-accord-fit-and-pilot-to-receive-new-engines-cvts/20290728/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20290728</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/2013-honda-accord-spy-photos-001-1338410609_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lexus to get own version of Toyota Prius C?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/lexus-to-get-own-version-of-toyota-prius-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/lexus-to-get-own-version-of-toyota-prius-c/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/lexus-to-get-own-version-of-toyota-prius-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-toyota-prius-c-first-drive/"><img alt="2013 Toyota Prius C - front three-quarter view - orange" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/2012-toyota-prius-c-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px; " /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/ct+200h/">CT 200h</a> proved that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> could make up for the sins against excitement committed by the company's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/17/lexus-kills-off-slow-selling-hs-250h/">short-lived</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/Lexus+HS250/">HS 250h</a>. Its bold styling and greatly improved handling combined with a fuel-efficient drivetrain suggests a brighter future for the compact luxury hybrid segment.<br />
<br />
Word is, though, that Lexus is working on a sub-CT hybrid entrant. According to Malaysian automotive outlet Paultan, the diminutive luxury fuel-sipper will be based on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/prius+c/">Toyota Prius C</a>. The website has tentatively dubbed the model AS150, but it is here where we must advise that you take some of the report's details with grains of salt in varying sizes. If history provides us with context, any Lexus hybrid would include an "h" in the name, for example.<br />
<br />
More believable, though, is the speculation that the powerplant would be a variation of the 1.5-liter Hybrid Synergy Drive module that powers the Prius C. Another alternative floated by Paultan is that an even smaller 1.2-liter turbocharged unit featuring direct injection could find its way into the subcompact's engine bay.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/lexus-to-get-own-version-of-toyota-prius-c/">Lexus to get own version of Toyota Prius C?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/lexus-to-get-own-version-of-toyota-prius-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20288892/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/lexus-to-get-own-version-of-toyota-prius-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>as150</category><category>fuel efficient</category><category>hybrid</category><category>lexus</category><category>lexus hybrid</category><category>mpg</category><category>prius c</category><category>subcompact</category><category>toyota prius c</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[George Kennedy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:44:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20288892/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/07/30/lexus-to-get-own-version-of-toyota-prius-c/20288892/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20288892</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/2012-toyota-prius-c-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2013 Chevrolet Spark gets EPA rating of 32/38 MPG]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/24/2013-chevrolet-spark-gets-epa-rating-of-32-38-mpg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/24/2013-chevrolet-spark-gets-epa-rating-of-32-38-mpg/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/24/2013-chevrolet-spark-gets-epa-rating-of-32-38-mpg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/05/2013-chevrolet-spark-to-start-at-12-995/"><img alt="2013 Chevy Spark" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/2013-chevrolet-spark-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 393px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> can't be too happy with the <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&amp;path=1&amp;year1=2013&amp;year2=2013&amp;make=Chevrolet&amp;model=Spark&amp;srchtyp=ymm">EPA</a> numbers for its tiny <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/spark/">Spark</a>. Equipped with the 1.2-liter engine and five-speed manual, the smallest Chevy in history gets 32 miles per gallon in the city, 38 on the highway for a combined EPA number of 34 mpg. Not bad, but not what we and, presumably, Chevy, were hoping for. Add the optional automatic transmission, and the numbers drop to 28 city, 37 highway and a combined number of 32 mpg.<br />
<br />
When we first saw the Spark at the <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2009/03/02/welcome-to-geneva-meet-the-2010-chevrolet-spark-47-mpg-us/">Geneva show</a> in 2009, the Spark was expected to get a combined number of 47 mpg, though that may have been forecasting a European rating.<br />
<br />
With its small size and small, 1.2 liter, 85 hp engine, it's easy to think of the Spark as super efficient. The similarly-sized <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/smart/fortwo/">Smart ForTwo</a> gets a combined EPA number of 36 mpg, while the larger <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/accent/">Hyundai Accent</a> gets <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&amp;path=1&amp;year1=2013&amp;year2=2013&amp;make=Hyundai&amp;model=Accent&amp;srchtyp=ymm">34</a> as well.<br />
<br />
In fact, the Spark's larger stablemates, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze/">Cruze Eco</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/sonic/">Sonic</a>, can do almost as well if properly equipped. Both cars gets a combined 33 mpg with the turbocharged 1.4 liter and manual six-speed transmission. The Sonic even breaks the 40-mpg barrier in highway driving and the Cruze Eco gets an even better 42.<br />
<br />
The moral of this story? Looks like a sixth gear makes a huge difference in fuel economy. And if you don't mind paying a little more, you can get a larger Chevy with better EPA numbers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/24/2013-chevrolet-spark-gets-epa-rating-of-32-38-mpg/">2013 Chevrolet Spark gets EPA rating of 32/38 MPG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/24/2013-chevrolet-spark-gets-epa-rating-of-32-38-mpg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20284990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/24/2013-chevrolet-spark-gets-epa-rating-of-32-38-mpg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevrolet spark</category><category>chevy+spark</category><category>chevyspark</category><category>cruze</category><category>EPA</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>Hyundai Accent</category><category>MPG</category><category>Smart Fortwo</category><category>spark</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20284990/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/07/24/2013-chevrolet-spark-gets-epa-rating-of-32-38-mpg/20284990/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20284990</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/2013-chevrolet-spark-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lies, Damned Lies and Fuel Economy Numbers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><em><big>Taking A Detailed Look At Why 'Your Mileage May Vary'</big></em><br />
<br />
<img alt="Hyundai Elantra window sticker" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/hyundai-elantra-sticker.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 371px; " /><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="pull-quote pull-quote-right">
	<p>
		It's safe to say that mileage claims are controversial at best, and often inaccurate.</p>
</blockquote>
"There are three types of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics," goes the old quote variously attributed to Mark Twain, Benjamin Disraeli and other wits. Were they writing today, they'd probably add a fourth: fuel economy numbers.<br />
<br />
As regular readers have heard, <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai">Hyundai</a> is <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/11/hyundai-elantra-subject-of-class-action-lawsuit-for-misleading/">being sued</a> for allegedly misleading mileage ads. <a href="http://autoblog.com/honda">Honda</a>, meanwhile, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/09/honda-wins-appeal-in-civic-hybrid-fuel-mileage-case/">beat back</a> one <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/civic hybrid">Civic Hybrid</a> owners mileage lawsuit upon appeal but also agreed to a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/16/honda-plans-to-settle-civic-hybrid-mileage-suit-out-of-court-is/">settlement</a> covering thousands of others who didn't get nearly what the automaker promised.<br />
<br />
Without taking sides in these individual cases. it's nonetheless safe to say that mileage claims are controversial at best, and often inaccurate, at least in terms of what real world driving is likely to yield.<br />
<br />
"Your mileage may vary" is a disclaimer we've all heard, and certainly there are enough variables that impact what your car, truck or crossover will deliver: such factors as the speed you drive, what altitude the vehicle is operated at, what fuel you use, whether your tires are properly inflated and how many passengers you've got crammed into the backseat. And considering the added bulk too many of us carry around our middles, even that can play a role.<br />
<br />
<hr style="width: 628px !important;" />
<div style="text-align: right;">
	<em><img alt="Paul Eisenstein" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/eisenstein-driving-thumb.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 0px 6px; float: right;" /></em><em>Paul A. Eisenstein is Publisher of </em><a href="http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/"><em>TheDetroitBureau.com</em></a><em> and a 30-year veteran of the automotive beat. His editorials bring his unique perspective and deep understanding of the auto world to Autoblog readers on a regular basis.</em></div>
<br />
<hr style="width: 628px !important;" /><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lies, Damned Lies and Fuel Economy Numbers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/">Lies, Damned Lies and Fuel Economy Numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20276693/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eisenstein</category><category>eisenstein on autoblog</category><category>epa</category><category>featured</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel mileage</category><category>hyundai</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>monroney</category><category>mpg</category><category>thedetroitbureau.com</category><category>window sticker</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Eisenstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20276693/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/07/12/lies-damned-lies-and-fuel-economy-numbers/20276693/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20276693</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/hyundai-elantra-sticker_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Base 2013 Cadillac ATS gets EPA rating of 22 mpg city and 33 hwy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/11/base-2013-cadillac-ats-gets-epa-rating-of-22-mpg-city-and-33-hwy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/11/base-2013-cadillac-ats-gets-epa-rating-of-22-mpg-city-and-33-hwy/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/11/base-2013-cadillac-ats-gets-epa-rating-of-22-mpg-city-and-33-hwy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-cadillac-ats/"><img alt="2013 Cadillac ATS - maroon - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/atsmileage.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 372px; " /></a><br />
<br />
The EPA has delivered the fuel economy results for the 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/ats">Cadillac ATS</a> with the 2.5-liter, four cylinder: 22 city, 33 highway, 26 combined. The response so far range from 'That's not what we expected' to 'Well, what did you expect?' <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac">Cadillac</a> describes the ATS as a "compact luxury sedan... built on a foundation of quick, nimble fun-to-drive dynamics and mass efficiency," so everyone is ready to grade on the sports-sedan curve, and while we think taken on their own they're fine if nothing special, some were expecting better frugality from the Ecotec motor.<br />
<br />
The issue is that the EPA numbers for the 2.5-liter put the ATS in the thick of the playing field, in there with the 23 city/33 hwy of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/3+series">BMW 328i</a>, the 21 city/31 hwy of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/c-class">Mercedes-Benz C250</a> Sport Sedan and the 22 city/30 hwy of the front-wheel drive <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/a4">Audi A4</a>. But the Cadillac's 202-horsepower and 190 pound-feet mean it is down on power to the other cars in its class - 38 hp shy of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw">BMW</a>, 39 lb-ft down on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz">Mercedes-Benz</a>, for instance - at the same time, it is less expensive than the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/">BMW</a> and Mercedes.<br />
<br />
<em>Motor Trend</em> reports that General Motors predicts 22 city/32 hwy for the more powerful 2.0-liter turbo that puts out 270 hp and 260 lb-ft, the same as it did for the 2.5-liter, and that's what could make for the biggest question mark. The 2.0-liter would give the ATS a leg up on others in its class - it's not for nothing that the ATS site uses <a href="http://www.cadillac.com/ats-compact-car.html">this motor for comparison</a> - and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/07/gm-announces-pricing-for-2013-cadillac-ats-starting-at-33-990/">$1,805 premium over an ATS with the 2.5-liter</a> pegs it exactly to the 328i's $35,795 base price. If the stronger engine does return the same EPA numbers, then until we have a better idea of standard equipment, lots of folks will wonder whether $1,900 is enough monetary space to make a case for a markedly less powerful car that won't save you any money on gas.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/11/base-2013-cadillac-ats-gets-epa-rating-of-22-mpg-city-and-33-hwy/">Base 2013 Cadillac ATS gets EPA rating of 22 mpg city and 33 hwy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/11/base-2013-cadillac-ats-gets-epa-rating-of-22-mpg-city-and-33-hwy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20275775/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/11/base-2013-cadillac-ats-gets-epa-rating-of-22-mpg-city-and-33-hwy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.5-liter</category><category>2013 cadillac ats</category><category>ats</category><category>ats fuel economy</category><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac ats fuel economy</category><category>ecotec</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:33:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20275775/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/07/11/base-2013-cadillac-ats-gets-epa-rating-of-22-mpg-city-and-33-hwy/20275775/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20275775</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/atsmileage_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2013 Chevy Volt increases range to 38 electric miles, 98 MPGe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img alt="2013 Chevrolet Volt window sticker" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2012/06/2012-chevy-volt-epa-sticker-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 529px; " /><br />
<br />
And thus the mid-cycle product refresh - so common to computers and cellphones - comes around again to <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/06/01/chevy-volt-sales-climb-to-1-680-in-may-nissan-leaf-rebounds-to/">GM's plug-in hybrid</a>.<br />
<br />
The new EPA sticker for the <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/volt">2013 Chevrolet Volt</a> has been released, and with it comes a fresh set of numbers. The highlights are an improved all-electric range and miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe) rating: 38 miles and 98 MPGe - that's three miles of additional electric range and five more MPGe than last year. GM said in a statement today that "minor changes to the material composition of the battery cell chemistry" and a boost in overall battery capacity from 16 kWh to 16.5 are responsible for the increase. Allowing the car to use more of that capacity - 10.8 kWh now, up from 10.3 before - also helps. Unsurprisingly, the bigger battery also gives the Volt a slightly longer recharge time.<br />
<br />
As <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/04/17/2013-chevy-volt-battery-conservation-mode-lane-departure/">previously reported</a>, the 2013 Volt also gets a new "EV Hold Mode" that forces the car to burn gas and "hold" the energy in the battery for later use. "EV Hold Mode" is <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2011/05/20/bibendum-2011-opel-ampera-not-only-looks-better-than-the-chevy/">available on the Volt's European sister vehicle</a>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ampera/">Opel Ampera</a>, and early Volt buyers could sort of force their cars into this operation by <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2011/05/24/take-control-of-your-chevy-volt-with-mountain-mode/">engaging "Mountain Mode</a>." Visually, the 2013 Volt will also lose the black roof and trunk backing, using the main body color for those parts (GM has yet to release new images showing this development) and gain an available lane-departure warning system.<br />
<br />
You can compare the 2013 Volt sticker above to the 2011 model <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2010/12/23/video-making-sense-chevy-volt-epa-label/">here</a>. The important numbers from the first Volt are: 93 MPGe, 36 kWh per 100 miles, 37 mpg in gas-only mode and a 35 mile all-electric range. For 2012, the Volt <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2012_Chevrolet_Volt_EPA_window_sticker_0483.jpg">improved in one category</a>: 94 MPGe. All others remain the same.<br />
<br />
As expected, the Volt will also be available with a special low-emissions package for California and New York giving drivers access to the states' HOV lanes with solo occupancy. For details on all 2013 Volt developments, check out the official press verbiage by <a href="/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/#continued">scrolling below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2013 Chevy Volt increases range to 38 electric miles, 98 MPGe</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/">2013 Chevy Volt increases range to 38 electric miles, 98 MPGe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20253673/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 chevrolet volt</category><category>2013 chevy volt</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet volt</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy volt</category><category>mpg</category><category>mpge</category><category>volt</category><category>volt fuel economy</category><category>volt mpg</category><category>volt mpge</category><category>volt sticker</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian Blanco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20253673/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/06/07/2013-chevy-volt-increases-range-to-38-electric-miles-98-mpge/20253673/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20253673</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2012/06/2012-chevy-volt-epa-sticker-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>