<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ask Autoblog: Why doesn't my guzzler qualify as a clunker?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/14/ask-autoblog-why-doesnt-my-guzzler-qualify-as-a-clunker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/14/ask-autoblog-why-doesnt-my-guzzler-qualify-as-a-clunker/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/14/ask-autoblog-why-doesnt-my-guzzler-qualify-as-a-clunker/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/89607741_opta.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<br />
We've been hearing plenty of horror stories this past week about people trying and failing to trade in their vehicles under the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cashforclunkers">Cash for Clunkers</a> program. We recently received an e-mail from a reader named Rex asking about his particular case. Unfortunately, a big part of the problem is either lack of information or inaccurate information on the part of both dealers and the government. In Rex's case, he was trying to buy a 2009 GMC Sierra half-ton pickup with a 5.3-liter V8. His initial rejected trade was a 1985 GMC Suburban. After that, he was given two different government numbers to call and no one at those numbers or at the dealer could explain why he was rejected. <br />
<br />
The answer is actually quite simple. The 1985 Suburban is rated at 13 mpg combined and the base 5.3-liter 2009 Sierra is rated at 16 mpg combined. To qualify for the clunker rebate, the new vehicle must get at least 4 mpg more than the old one. In this case, if Rex had opted for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/31/2010-chevy-silverado-xfe-updated-to-achieve-best-in-class-22-mpg/">Sierra XFE</a>, he should've be able to get the rebate because it is rated at 17 mpg, thus clearing the lower limit. <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/clunkertruck_opt.jpg" />After the 1985 truck was rejected, Rex offered up a 1990 3/4 ton pickup (example above), which was also turned down. The explanation here was also mpg-related, but for a different reason. The larger, newer truck is a heavy duty unit with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_vehicle_weight_rating">gross vehicle weight rating</a> (GVWR) of over 8,500 pounds. These larger trucks are not subject to CAFE standards and aren't assigned EPA sticker ratings. Without an EPA sticker value, even though this truck is considerably thirstier than the Suburban, it was also turned away.</div>
<br />
The moral of the story is to make sure you carefully check the mpg rating of your trade-in and the new vehicle you want to buy before you go shopping. For trucks, the improvement must be at least 2 mpg for the $3,500 rebate and 5 mpg for the $4,500 (for cars: 5 mpg and 10 mpg). You can do the research by visiting fueleconomy.gov.<br />
<br />
[Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty]<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/14/ask-autoblog-why-doesnt-my-guzzler-qualify-as-a-clunker/">Ask Autoblog: Why doesn't my guzzler qualify as a clunker?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/14/ask-autoblog-why-doesnt-my-guzzler-qualify-as-a-clunker/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19119278/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/14/ask-autoblog-why-doesnt-my-guzzler-qualify-as-a-clunker/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C4C</category><category>cash for clunkers</category><category>cash for clunkers bill</category><category>CashForClunkers</category><category>CashForClunkersBill</category><category>guzzler</category><category>mileage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan pokes fun at Volt, claims 367 mpg equivalent for Leaf EV]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/nissan-pokes-fun-at-the-volt-claims-367-mpg-equivalent-for-leaf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/nissan-pokes-fun-at-the-volt-claims-367-mpg-equivalent-for-leaf/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/nissan-pokes-fun-at-the-volt-claims-367-mpg-equivalent-for-leaf/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/nissan-leaf/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/leafevtwitter_opt.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Nissan Leaf EV - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br /> Not content to let General Motors grab <em>all </em>the shiny happy tree-huggy headlines today with its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/gm-ceo-henderson-announces-the-volt-will-get-230-mpg-in-the/">230 mpg claim</a> for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/model/volt">Chevy Volt</a> in city operation, the gang manning the <a href="http://twitter.com/NissanEVs">NissanEVs</a> Twitter account needled GM's range-extended EV messiah, tweeting:<br /> <br />
<div align="center"><em><span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content">Nissan Leaf = 367 mpg, no tailpipe, and no gas required. Oh yeah, and it'll be affordable too!</span></span></em></div>
<br /> Given that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/chevy-volt-gets-230-mpg-but-how/">the methodology</a> of how the feds will ultimately arrive at the official mileage numbers (or mileage equivalents) for many of these next-gen greenmobiles is not yet finalized, we'll take all the hype and scoreboard pointing with a grain of salt until we see actual, final numbers posted at <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov">FuelEconomy.gov</a>. (Nissan says its <a href="http://twitter.com/NissanEVs/status/3248710288">367 mpg figure</a> was derived by using the Department of Energy formula.)<br /> <br /> In any case, a Twitter spitball fight between <a href="http://twitter.com/GMBlogs">GMBlogs</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/NissanEVs">NissanEVs</a> over this stuff would be kind of entertaining to watch. Sorta like the nerdy opposite of the ZR1 vs. GT-R debate.<br /> <br /> <br /> <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-leaf/low/">2010 Nissan Leaf EV</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-leaf/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/nissan-leaf_hi_006_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-leaf/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/nissan-leaf_hi_007_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-leaf/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/nissan-leaf_hi_008_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-leaf/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/nissan-leaf_hi_009_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-leaf/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/nissan-leaf_hi_010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /> [Source: <a href="http://twitter.com/NissanEVs">Nissan EVs onTwitter</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/nissan-pokes-fun-at-the-volt-claims-367-mpg-equivalent-for-leaf/">Nissan pokes fun at Volt, claims 367 mpg equivalent for Leaf EV</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/nissan-pokes-fun-at-the-volt-claims-367-mpg-equivalent-for-leaf/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19125828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/11/nissan-pokes-fun-at-the-volt-claims-367-mpg-equivalent-for-leaf/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 chevrolet volt</category><category>2011ChevroletVolt</category><category>230 mpg</category><category>230Mpg</category><category>367 mpg</category><category>367Mpg</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet volt</category><category>ChevroletVolt</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy volt</category><category>ChevyVolt</category><category>leaf</category><category>mileage</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan leaf</category><category>NissanLeaf</category><category>volt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2009 BMW X6 gets some preliminary EPA numbers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/21/2009-bmw-x6-gets-some-preliminary-epa-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/21/2009-bmw-x6-gets-some-preliminary-epa-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/21/2009-bmw-x6-gets-some-preliminary-epa-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-2/746701/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="top" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/white-x6-450.jpg" /></a><br /><br />When we had our <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/11/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-xdrive35i-and-xdrive50i/">First Drive in BMW's new X6 Sport Activity Coupe</a>, we didn't get the opportunity to really measure fuel consumption, since the vehicles were gassed-up when we got behind the wheel and were then refuelled during our lunch break. A glance at the on-board computer of the '35i we drove on the long route through the mountains indicated about 13.5 mpg which is nothing to write home about. The other day, BMW sent us the preliminary EPA numbers for the X6 which came in at 15/20/17mpg city/highway/combined for the turbo six cylinder model. The 404hp turbo V-8 completed the test cycles with ratings of 13/18/15mpg. When the two-mode hybrid version of the version of the X6 debuts in 2009, it will be combined only with the V-8 engine. With an expected 25 percent improvement overall, the X6 hybrid should hit about 18-19mpg combined.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-2/low/">First Drive: 2009 BMW X6</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-2/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/00_bmwx6firstdrive_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-2/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/01_bmwx6firstdrive_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-2/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/02_bmwx6firstdrive_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-2/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/03_bmwx6firstdrive_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2009-bmw-x6-2/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/04_bmwx6firstdrive_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: BMW]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/21/2009-bmw-x6-gets-some-preliminary-epa-numbers/">2009 BMW X6 gets some preliminary EPA numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/21/2009-bmw-x6-gets-some-preliminary-epa-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1170782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/21/2009-bmw-x6-gets-some-preliminary-epa-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>bmw x6</category><category>bmw-x6</category><category>BmwX6</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel efficiency</category><category>fuel-efficiency</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>FuelEfficiency</category><category>mileage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More cars than ever require premium fuel]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more-cars-than-ever-require-premium-fuel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more-cars-than-ever-require-premium-fuel/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more-cars-than-ever-require-premium-fuel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drive</a></p><p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2008-04-13-premium-gas_N.htm"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/fuel_pump_2_opt.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Whether you call it "premium," "super unleaded," or even "high test," it all means the same thing -- the most expensive gasoline at the pump. In a somewhat counterproductive trend, the skyrocketing cost of fuel is forcing automobile manufacturers to use smaller and more powerful engines, often with forced-induction. Unfortunately, these engines require higher octane... the distinguishing feature of premium fuel.</p>
<p><em>Kelley Blue Book</em> has been following the trend and according to their analysis, there were 166 vehicle models that required premium fuel in 2002. This year, that number is up to 282. While some automakers only require premium for their highest performing models, companies like BMW call for premium fuel across their model range. </p>
<p>While there is no advantage to running premium fuel in an engine that doesn't call for it, you should run the higher octane fuel in a powerplant designed for it (<em>if in doubt, check the owner's manual, or the inside of the fuel filler door</em>). While nearly every late-model high-performance engine on the road can handle a slightly lower octane rating without damage, don't skimp when filling up as your fuel economy and horsepower will suffer (<em>yes, it will likely negate any savings at the pump</em>). </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2008-04-13-premium-gas_N.htm">USA Today</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more-cars-than-ever-require-premium-fuel/">More cars than ever require premium fuel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more-cars-than-ever-require-premium-fuel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1170334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more-cars-than-ever-require-premium-fuel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Economy</category><category>Fuel</category><category>High Octane</category><category>High Test</category><category>HighOctane</category><category>HighTest</category><category>Mileage</category><category>MPG</category><category>Premium</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler says it will meet new CAFE standards]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Daily_Auto_News/Chrysler_Well_Meet_New_Mileage_Rules.S173.A13748.html?DID=RSS"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/hemi_hybrid.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Detroit's sharp intake of breath over the very real possibility of increased federal fuel economy standards apparently doesn't include Chrysler's voice. CEO Robert Nardelli has told The Car Connection that rather than waste lots of time and energy opposing the likely increase to a 35 mpg fleet average, Chrysler will put its head down and get it done. Attaining the goal will not be without pain, however. Cuts will be made, and the books are still in the red. <br /><br />There is hope, though, if Chrysler and parent Cerberus Capital can stick it out. A new contract with the UAW eases some of the automaker's financial burden, allowing that money to be plowed into development of more fuel efficient vehicles. There's a new two-mode hybrid system, co-developed with Daimler, GM, and BMW, which should help lift the fleet average without Chrysler abandoning their bread and butter moneymakers. With a lineup heavy in less-frugal vehicles like SUVs, trucks, and minivans, Chrysler's acknowledged the holes in their product mix and will set about plugging product into the voids. First up is the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/11/frankfurt-2007-dodge-journey-drops-in-germany/">Journey</a>, the company's first crossover vehicle. The CUV segment is red-hot right now, so having a model to sell is a plus. Having a <em>good</em> model that will continue to sell well is an even bigger plus. At this point, Chrysler's facing an uphill climb. <br /><br />[Source: TCC]<br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/">Chrysler says it will meet new CAFE standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Daily_Auto_News/Chrysler_Well_Meet_New_Mileage_Rules.S173.A13748.html?DID=RSS>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1061496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cafe</category><category>cerberus</category><category>chrysler</category><category>economy</category><category>fuel</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>hemi</category><category>hybrid</category><category>mileage</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>MilesPerGallon</category><category>mpg</category><category>nardelli</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VW finds highest mileage diesel in Ohio]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/vw-finds-highest-mileage-diesel-in-ohio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/vw-finds-highest-mileage-diesel-in-ohio/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/vw-finds-highest-mileage-diesel-in-ohio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/highest-mileage-vw-diesel-in-u-s/365385/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/sylschmid_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><em>click either image to enlarge</em><br /><br /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/highest-mileage-vw-diesel-in-u-s/365384/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/odometer.jpg_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Earlier this month, Volkswagen of America showed off the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/16/oldest-vw-diesel-found-in-california/">oldest VW diesel in the U.S.</a>, a 1977 diesel Rabbit residing in California. Today it revealed the second half of its search, the highest mileage VW diesel in the U.S. This one is a 1986 Jetta Turbo Diesel owned by Syl Schmid of Blue Rock, Ohio. It's racked up over 562,000 miles in its lifestyle and has the weary odometer to prove it. Not only that, but Schmid has records to prove that the car has consistently achieved over 50 mpg throughout its lifetime. Take that, Prius! Just don't ask about its particulate emissions, though. For its longevity, the car has won its owner a six-month lease for VW Touareg V10 TDI. <br /><br />Having owned two 1986 VW Jettas in my lifetime, both gas-powered, I can attest to VW's amazing find from central Ohio. Schmid's Jetta even has its original drivetrain and muffler! Both of my Jettas needed new exhaust systems thanks to the corrosive effects of Cleveland's salting strategy in the winter, so to hear a fellow Ohioan has made it through over twenty winters with the same exhaust is just incredible. <br /><br />[Source: Volkswagen]<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/highest-mileage-vw-diesel-in-u-s/low/">Highest Mileage VW Diesel in U.S.</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/highest-mileage-vw-diesel-in-u-s/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/sylschmid_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/highest-mileage-vw-diesel-in-u-s/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/odometer.jpg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/vw-finds-highest-mileage-diesel-in-ohio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VW finds highest mileage diesel in Ohio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/vw-finds-highest-mileage-diesel-in-ohio/">VW finds highest mileage diesel in Ohio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/vw-finds-highest-mileage-diesel-in-ohio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/972292/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/vw-finds-highest-mileage-diesel-in-ohio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1986 volkswagen jetta turbo diesel</category><category>1986 vw jetta turbo diesel</category><category>1986VolkswagenJettaTurboDiesel</category><category>1986VwJettaTurboDiesel</category><category>highest mileage</category><category>HighestMileage</category><category>mileage</category><category>miles</category><category>odometer</category><category>syl schmid</category><category>SylSchmid</category><category>volkswagen</category><category>vw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Voters want better gas mileage, and sooner]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/voters-want-better-gas-mileage-and-sooner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/voters-want-better-gas-mileage-and-sooner/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/voters-want-better-gas-mileage-and-sooner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><p><a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/survey-finds-st.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/better_cafe_now.jpg" alt="" /></a>In a survey of 30 congressional districts in the Midwest and Southeast, it was "found that nearly nine out of ten voters want mandatory increases in fuel efficiency." In fact, to be specific, they want the House of Representatives to pass the same CAFE standards as the Senate passed two months ago: 35 mpg for cars and trucks by 2020, and chose that over a slightly less strict competing bill. Even more startling: 85% of the respondents wanted compliance brought up to 2018.</p>
<p>Having said that, we can't help but think the results are slightly skewed. If the survey question wasn't entirely loaded, there were at least a couple of rounds in the cylinder. Essentially, respondents were asked to agree with one of two statements: carmakers <em>should not</em> have to make cars with better gas mileage because if they do it will make everything worse for America and you won't be able to buy an SUV, or, carmakers <em>should</em> have to make cars with better gas mileage because it will make everything better for America and you'll save money and we won't rely so much on foreign oil. Let me see...</p>
<p>According to the survey, voters apparently saw no negative consequences from mandating higher CAFE standards, with up to 81% believing that vehicles would remain just as powerful, just as safe, workers wouldn't lose their jobs, and the need to innovate would invigorate the economy. There is undoubtedly a desire for more fuel efficient vehicles, with a lot of room on all sides for the various parties to come up with workable solutions that benefit the most and harm the least. There could also, however, be surveys that do a better job of highlighting that fact.</p>
<p>[Source: Green Car Congress]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/voters-want-better-gas-mileage-and-sooner/">Voters want better gas mileage, and sooner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/survey-finds-st.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/voters-want-better-gas-mileage-and-sooner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/952991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/voters-want-better-gas-mileage-and-sooner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cafe</category><category>environment</category><category>government</category><category>legislation</category><category>mileage</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BREAKING: Senators reach agreement on CAFE standards]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/22/breaking-senators-reach-agreement-on-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/22/breaking-senators-reach-agreement-on-cafe-standards/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/22/breaking-senators-reach-agreement-on-cafe-standards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070621/REG/306210006/1175&amp;refsect="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/300px-us_capitol_dome_jan_2006.jpg"  alt="" /></a>As our colleagues over at AutoblogGreen note, with all the lobbying going on this week for and against tougher fuel economy standards, it's been tough following who's for what and what's good for whom. Regardless, the debate came to end late yesterday when the Senate agreed to a portion of the new energy bill that calls for raising the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard to 35 mpg by 2020 for both cars and trucks. The current CAFE standard is 27.5 mpg for cars and 22.5 mpg for trucks. <br /><br />The new bill is a compromise of sorts, as a proposed annual 4% increase in the CAFE standards after they reach 35 mpg in 2020 was scrapped along with a $29 billion tax package that would have paid for tax breaks for producers of alternative fuels and owners of plug-in hybrids. <br /><br />All is not over, as the larger energy bill will continued to be debated today, and then the bill will move over to the House of Representatives. If it passes through the House, there's no guarantee the president won't strike it down with his veto pen, as he's already stated he does not approve of specific mileage numbers. Nevertheless, yesterday's 65-27 vote was somewhat historic considering how effective the auto industry has lobbied against raising CAFE standards for decades.<br /><br />[Source: Automotive News, <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/06/21/breaking-senators-reach-compromise-on-35-mpg-standard-but-not/">AutoblogGreen</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/22/breaking-senators-reach-agreement-on-cafe-standards/">BREAKING: Senators reach agreement on CAFE standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070621/REG/306210006/1175&amp;refsect=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/22/breaking-senators-reach-agreement-on-cafe-standards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/923830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/22/breaking-senators-reach-agreement-on-cafe-standards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking</category><category>CAFE</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>mileage</category><category>mpg</category><category>Senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Odo Uh-Oh: Honda extending warranties on 6 million cars]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/19/odo-uh-oh-honda-extending-warranties-on-6-million-cars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/19/odo-uh-oh-honda-extending-warranties-on-6-million-cars/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/19/odo-uh-oh-honda-extending-warranties-on-6-million-cars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2007-02-19-odometer-usat_x.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/08-08-05_1554.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Honda has decided to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleges its odometers were racking up miles too fast. The automaker says odometers on some 6 million Hondas affected by the suit were accurate to within 3.75% on the high side. The NHTSA doesn't regulate odometer accuracy, and the only industry standard is a voluntary one set by the Society of Automotive Engineers that says odos should be within +/-4%. While the car's affected by the suit fall within that range, Honda recognized that its customers expected their odometers "would be based on zero," and they weren't. <br /><br />The settlement will lengthen the warranty mileage of affected vehicles by 5% and Honda will pay lease-mileage penalties incurred by owners, which is expected to cost the automaker around $6 million. If you own a 2002 to 2006 Honda or Acura bought between April 12, 2002 and November 7, 2006, then you're eligible for the benefits of the settlement. <br /><br />The lawsuit also prompted lawyers to test the odometer accuracy of other vehicles. It was found that on average domestic vehicles were nearly perfect in their odo accuracy, while Toyotas actually racked up fewer miles on the clock than they did in reality. Nissans, however, didn't fare as well, and a new class-action suit has been filed on behalf of Altima owners who say their odometers are counting the miles 2.5% to 3% faster than they should.<br /><br />[Source: USA Today]<br /><br />Thanks for the tip, John!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/19/odo-uh-oh-honda-extending-warranties-on-6-million-cars/">Odo Uh-Oh: Honda extending warranties on 6 million cars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2007-02-19-odometer-usat_x.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/19/odo-uh-oh-honda-extending-warranties-on-6-million-cars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/800562/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/19/odo-uh-oh-honda-extending-warranties-on-6-million-cars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>class action</category><category>class-action</category><category>ClassAction</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lease</category><category>mileage</category><category>miles</category><category>odo</category><category>odometer</category><category>settlement</category><category>sue</category><category>sued</category><category>warranty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEMA: Alé contending for Automotive X-Prize]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/sema-al-contending-for-automotive-x-prize/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/sema-al-contending-for-automotive-x-prize/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/sema-al-contending-for-automotive-x-prize/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sema/" rel="tag">SEMA Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/img_5779.jpg" id="vimage_7" alt="" /><br /><br />The Al&eacute; from <a href="http://www.fuelvaporcar.com/html/the_car.html">Fuel Vapor Technologies</a> is the first actual entry for the Automotive X-Prize that we've come across. For those that need a refresher course, the X-Prize Foundation is the organization that got a private plane into orbit by dangling some big bucks at the end of a stick. The Automotive X-Prize will similarly offer a large amount of cash money for the car that can run the cleanest and longest on a tank of gas. While the rules haven't been finalized nor the amount of prize money announced, you can follow the Foundation's progress at its <a href="http://autoblog.xprize.org/">blog</a>. The Al&eacute; has been designed with the Automotive X-Prize in mind, and as such the three-wheeler can achieve 92 mpg. But it's not one of those completely impractical MPG whores that sacrifices all performance and practicality for that kind of mileage. It does 0-60 in under 5 seconds, runs a 12.9 second quarter mile, and corners at 1.7g! The Al&eacute; is powered by a four cyinder gasoline engine that uses a patent-pending fuel vapor system that literally allows it to run on fumes. According to its inventor, George Parker, most gas engines run on an 14.7:1 to air to gasoline ratio. The Al&eacute; uses a ratio of over 20:1, allowing it to stretch the amount of miles it can extract from a good old gallon of go juice. It's also extremely slippery and weighs only 1,300 lbs. The Ale is a front-wheel drive car, meaning the two front wheels are very busy both powering and steering this mega mileage trike. Who knows how it handles or if its relatively outrageous claims are true, as it's trapped inside a crowded SEMA hall at the moment. Hopefully we'll hear more about the Al&eacute; in the coming days as the Automotive X-Prize challenge progresses. <br /><br />Check out a full gallery of pics after the jump.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/sema-al-contending-for-automotive-x-prize/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEMA: Alé contending for Automotive X-Prize</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/sema-al-contending-for-automotive-x-prize/">SEMA: Alé contending for Automotive X-Prize</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/sema-al-contending-for-automotive-x-prize/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/694460/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/sema-al-contending-for-automotive-x-prize/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ale</category><category>environment</category><category>Fuel Vapor Technologies</category><category>FuelVaporTechnologies</category><category>mileage</category><category>MPG</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Saturn Outlook to start at $27,990]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/26/saturns-outlook-to-start-at-27-990/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/26/saturns-outlook-to-start-at-27-990/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/26/saturns-outlook-to-start-at-27-990/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/x07st_ot011.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /><br /><br />Saturn has announced that its new 8-passenger crossover called the Outlook will have an MSRP of $27,990 for a two-wheel drive model and $29,990 for an all-wheel drive XE model. Uplevel XR models will start at $30,290 for two-wheel drive and $32,290 for all-wheel drive. All models will get General Motors' 3.6-liter  VVT V6 that produces 270 hp and 248 ft-lbs. of torque in the base XE and 275 hp and 251 ft-lbs. of torque in the XR thanks to a dual exhaust system. Both engines are paired up with GM's new six-speed automatic transmission, which from what we've heard is a slick shifter. We also now know you can order up your Outlook with options like ultrasonic rear parking assist, a power lift gate, remote start, heated windshield washer fluid, a DVD entertainment system and DVD navigation. <br /><br />For those concerned that a 8-passenger crossover might be a fuel hog, you'll be surprised to learn that the EPA estimates for the Outlook aren't that bad. Saturn tells us that two-wheel drive models should get 18 mpg city/26mpg highway and four-wheel drive models 17 mpg city/24 mpg highway. We do expect the Outlook to eventually offer a V8 underhood, at which time those numbers will drop considerably. However, GM has a lot of technology available of which the Outlook could potentially avail itself, including a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/09/detroit-auto-show-gm-debuts-chevy-tahoe-hybrid/">two-mode hybrid system</a> that will be introduced in the Tahoe soon. Such a system would presumably work in the Outlook and its platform mates, the GMC Arcadia and Buick Enclave, returning better fuel mileage than the Tahoe hybrid thanks to its lower weight. Seems like this type of large vehicle would also be a prime candidate for a light-duty diesel engine.<br /><br />GM and Saturn are certainly being very aggressive with the Outlook's price, which we expect will be the least expensive of the three Lambda-based models. The Saturn Outlook's $28,000 base price is low enough even that people considering a Ford Edge, which <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/ford-edge-will-start-under-26k/">starts at just below $26,000</a> for a two-wheel drive model, will likely be attracted by the Outlook's extra row of seats. <br /><br />You can check out GM's full press release on the Outlook's pricing after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: General Motors]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/26/saturns-outlook-to-start-at-27-990/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Saturn Outlook to start at $27,990</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/26/saturns-outlook-to-start-at-27-990/">Saturn Outlook to start at $27,990</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/26/saturns-outlook-to-start-at-27-990/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/691299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/26/saturns-outlook-to-start-at-27-990/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arcadia</category><category>base price</category><category>BasePrice</category><category>diesel</category><category>enclave</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>hybrid</category><category>mileage</category><category>MSRP</category><category>outlook</category><category>pricing</category><category>V6</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota, Honda dominate U.S. fuel economy ratings]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/17/toyota-honda-dominate-u-s-fuel-economy-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/17/toyota-honda-dominate-u-s-fuel-economy-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/17/toyota-honda-dominate-u-s-fuel-economy-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/priuslogo.jpg" />The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy released Tuesday the 2007 edition of the government's Fuel Economy Guide, and Toyota and Honda models dominate the top of the rankings, with seven of the top ten fuel economy ratings, led by Toyota's Prius. Ford Motor was the only American automaker to crack the top ten, with three of its Ford and Mercury hybrids.<br /><br />Here are the ten best, in order:<br />1. Toyota Prius<br />2. Honda Civic Hybrid<br />3. Toyota Camry Hybrid<br />4. Ford Escape Hybrid FWD<br />5. Toyota Yaris (manual)<br />6. Toyota Yaris (automatic)<br />7. Honda Fit (manual)<br />8. Toyota Corolla (manual)<br />9. Hyundai Accent (manual) tied with the Kia Rio (manual)<br />10. Ford Escape Hybrid 4WD tied with the Mercury Mariner Hybrid 4WD<br /><br />While the gas-sipping Prius topped the list with EPA economy numbers of 60 mpg city and 51 mpg highway, the much less expensive gas-only Toyota Yaris and Honda Fit turned in very impressive numbers (34/40 and 33/38, respectively for the manual transmission versions).<br /><br />Perhaps the most entertaining aspect of the report is the seeing the EPA categorize the Aston Martin DB9 as a "minicompact," the Bentley Azure as a "subcompact," and the Ferrari 612 Scaglietti as a "midsize" car. (All three posted worst-in-class numbers, by the way.)<br /><br />Lots more info at the government's fuel economy website, <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/">here</a>. <br /><br />[Source: EPA]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/17/toyota-honda-dominate-u-s-fuel-economy-ratings/">Toyota, Honda dominate U.S. fuel economy ratings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/68b5f2d54f3eefd28525701500517fbf/032f1b5d167a36bf8525720a004f4660!OpenDocument>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/17/toyota-honda-dominate-u-s-fuel-economy-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/686376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/17/toyota-honda-dominate-u-s-fuel-economy-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>doe</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel efficiency</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>mileage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Canadians crack down on illegal idling]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/canadians-crack-down-on-illegal-idling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/canadians-crack-down-on-illegal-idling/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/canadians-crack-down-on-illegal-idling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.canadiandriver.com/news/060919-1.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/toronto-police.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></a>Anyone who feared that Canada's anti-idling law would go unenforced need not worry -- the city of Toronto and Toronto Police Services will ticket drivers (or idlers, as it were) of vehicles left idling for more than three minutes in a 60-minute time window. The infraction goes for $100 with a $25 provincial surcharge and was created to reduce the amount of smog polluting Canada's air. </p>
<p>Authorities are encouraging drivers to spend even less time idling than that, however -- they suggest that drivers don't warm up their vehicles before departing, and spending more than 10 seconds in the same spot should be accompanied by a driver turning his or her vehicle off except while in traffic. </p>
<p>While most would deem such efforts excessive (doesn't turning your vehicle off and on waste more gas?), for the most part the effort is a good one to reduce pollution and improve mileage.</p>
<p>[Source: Canadian Driver]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/canadians-crack-down-on-illegal-idling/">Canadians crack down on illegal idling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.canadiandriver.com/news/060919-1.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/canadians-crack-down-on-illegal-idling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/671387/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/canadians-crack-down-on-illegal-idling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>canada</category><category>EPA</category><category>gas prices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>idling</category><category>mileage</category><category>toronto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mod eliminates Hummer mileage problem...or does it?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/30/mod-eliminates-hummer-mileage-problem-or-does-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/30/mod-eliminates-hummer-mileage-problem-or-does-it/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/30/mod-eliminates-hummer-mileage-problem-or-does-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hummer/" rel="tag">Hummer</a></p><a href="http://transportation.engadget.com/2006/06/28/get-more-mileage-from-that-hummer/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/hummer.jpg" alt="" /></a>High gas prices combined with the Hummer's bottom-of-the-barrell gas mileage should spell doom for sales for the boxy SUV, right? Well, two Hummer dealerships may have found a technological workaround. Sib blog <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">engadget</a> reports that Detroit Hummer and Hummer of Novi are selling a modification, called the "Mileage Maximizer," that supposedly increases the SUV's miles per gallon up to as much as the mid-twenties. The modification comes from the aftermarket parts company Air Synergy Labs Inc. with the the dealerships charging $185.95 for the device.<br /><br />The modifiers have not yet been tested by Hummer or the brand's parent company, General Motors. Both strongly discourage such modifications and hint they may not honor any warranties to modified vehicles. Also, no governmental body has certified the device's claims. The dealerships, though, are pleased with the brisk sales of the modified SUVs. States Russ Reimer, service director for both dealerships, "....We've had some customers already call us back and say they have seen an improvement."<br /><br />Do we have to ask? Comments are now open. <br /><br />[Source: Wall Street Journal via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">engadget</a>; picture by Getty Images]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/30/mod-eliminates-hummer-mileage-problem-or-does-it/">Mod eliminates Hummer mileage problem...or does it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://transportation.engadget.com/2006/06/28/get-more-mileage-from-that-hummer/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/30/mod-eliminates-hummer-mileage-problem-or-does-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/638486/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/30/mod-eliminates-hummer-mileage-problem-or-does-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dealership</category><category>H1</category><category>H2</category><category>H3</category><category>mileage</category><category>mileage maximizer</category><category>MileageMaximizer</category><category>mpg</category><category>warranty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mitsubishi to offer CVT for first time in U.S.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/27/mitsubishi-to-offer-cvt-for-first-time-in-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/27/mitsubishi-to-offer-cvt-for-first-time-in-u-s/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/27/mitsubishi-to-offer-cvt-for-first-time-in-u-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mitsubishi/" rel="tag">Mitsubishi</a></p><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060626/FREE/60626002/1041/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/mit2005081160254_pv.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a><br /><br />The next Mitsubishi Lancer will be the first vehicle from the company to be offered with a continuously variable transmission when it goes on sale next March. The CVT will be paired with a 2.4L version of the World Engine that Mitsubishi helped develop in conjunction with Hyundai and Daimler Chrysler. <br /><br />AutoWeek reports that Mitsubishi is using the CVT as a relatively inexpensive way to increase fuel economy. The new tranny could improve the Lancer's fuel economy by up to 20 percent. The move will give the struggling Japanese automaker an attractive product in its portfolio for those seeking efficiency over performance. <br /><br />Other notable items that AutoWeek mentioned include the fact that Mitsubishi isn't developing a hybrid because it would be just too expensive to develop. The company is, however, planning to offer a diesel in the U.S. by 2010 and is also working on creating flex-fuel engines capable of running E85. <br /><br />[Source: AutoWeek]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/27/mitsubishi-to-offer-cvt-for-first-time-in-u-s/">Mitsubishi to offer CVT for first time in U.S.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060626/FREE/60626002/1041/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/27/mitsubishi-to-offer-cvt-for-first-time-in-u-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/637237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/27/mitsubishi-to-offer-cvt-for-first-time-in-u-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>continuously variable transmission</category><category>ContinuouslyVariableTransmission</category><category>CVT</category><category>diesel</category><category>E85</category><category>emissions</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>mileage</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gas prices a threat to GM turnaround?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/19/gas-prices-a-threat-to-gm-turnaround/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/19/gas-prices-a-threat-to-gm-turnaround/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/19/gas-prices-a-threat-to-gm-turnaround/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3641827a6026,00.html"><img hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/yukon.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></a>To all GeneralMotors executives and news reporters proclaiming the company's new SUVs a rousing success,&nbsp;hold your horses-- atleast through the summer.&nbsp;The new GMT900 siblings may be fine vehicles, but gas prices are back up and consumersare starting to feel the pinch again. While full-size SUVs like the Chevy Tahoe and GMC Yukon (pictured) appeal tobuyers who would buy an SUV regardless of the state of gas prices, vehicles such like the Chevy Trailblazer and GMCEnvoy are arguably more price sensitive purchases. These buyers&nbsp;may in fact choose a more fuel-efficient crossovervehicle instead -- a vehicle doesn't make GM nearly as much&nbsp;money, not to mention the fact that the company iscurrently experiencing a gaping hole in the mid-size crossover segment, sending potential GM buyers elsewhere.</p>
<p>[Source: Reuters via Stuff.co.za]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/19/gas-prices-a-threat-to-gm-turnaround/">Gas prices a threat to GM turnaround?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3641827a6026,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/19/gas-prices-a-threat-to-gm-turnaround/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/609695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/19/gas-prices-a-threat-to-gm-turnaround/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fuel Economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>gas price</category><category>GasPrice</category><category>GMC Envoy</category><category>GmcEnvoy</category><category>GMT900</category><category>mileage</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan revises down Versa fuel economy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/09/nissan-revises-down-versa-fuel-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/09/nissan-revises-down-versa-fuel-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/09/nissan-revises-down-versa-fuel-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><img width="421" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="230" border="0" align="top" alt=""src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/07_versa_hatch_13.jpg" /><br /><br />In a short-but-sweet press releaseNissan announced that it is revising downward the estimated EPA combined city/highway gas mileage for its XtronicCVT-equipped Versa sub-compact. The original estimate was 38 mpg, which has now fallen to 33 mpg. Nissan offered noexplanation for the adjustment. All Versa models are powered by a 122-hp, 1.8L four-cylinder engine. <br /><br/>&nbsp;[Source: Nissan]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/09/nissan-revises-down-versa-fuel-economy/">Nissan revises down Versa fuel economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 09 Apr 2006 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/09/nissan-revises-down-versa-fuel-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/606947/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/09/nissan-revises-down-versa-fuel-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVT</category><category>four-cylinder</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel mileage</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>FuelMileage</category><category>mileage</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>MilesPerGallon</category><category>mpg</category><category>Nissan</category><category>sub-compact</category><category>Versa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Go on a diet, and ten other roads toward better fuel economy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/go-on-a-diet-and-ten-other-roads-to-achieving-better-fuel-econo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/go-on-a-diet-and-ten-other-roads-to-achieving-better-fuel-econo/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/go-on-a-diet-and-ten-other-roads-to-achieving-better-fuel-econo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/maintenance/" rel="tag">Maintenance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.onwheelsinc.com/AAOWMagazine/20060102/page06.asp"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/fuel-gauge.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>With gasolineprices on their way back up again, automotive resource <a href="http://www.onwheelsinc.com/default.asp">AAOW</a>magazine has thoughtfully compiled eleven ways to maximize fuel efficiency. The list includes:<br /><br />
<ol>
    <li><em>Read your owner's manual</em>. Learn how to properly use those heated and cooled seats withoutburning a hole in your gas funds. </li>
    <li><em>Maintain your vehicle</em>. Well-known among enthusiasts, a properly serviced and maintained vehicle givesoptimum gas mileage. </li>
    <li><em>Calculate your mpg regularly</em>. Consider servicing if your miles per gallon is off more than10-percent. </li>
    <li><em>Lose weight</em>. Remove those beach chairs and any sand from the trunk of your car. </li>
    <li><em>Turn it off</em>. Turn on your car when you're about to leave, not when you expect your loved one to getout of the bathroom. </li>
    <li><em>Calm down</em>. Sorry, but treating every stoplight like the start of a drag race will not save fuel.</li>
    <li><em>Premium versus regular</em>. Use the latter if okay'd by your owner's manual. </li>
    <li><em>Don't top the tank.</em> You might trigger a 'check engine' lamp or spill fuel. </li>
    <li><em>Plan your day</em>. The more 'cold' starts you do, the worse the gas mileage. </li>
    <li><em>Pump up the volume</em>.&nbsp; That is, tire pressure. Check your manual. </li>
    <li><em>Get a gas card</em>. One word: rebates. </li>
</ol>
Full explanation can be found at the link. What would you add to the list?<br /><br /><br />[Source: AAOW viaOnWheels.com]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/go-on-a-diet-and-ten-other-roads-to-achieving-better-fuel-econo/">Go on a diet, and ten other roads toward better fuel economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.onwheelsinc.com/AAOWMagazine/20060102/page06.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/go-on-a-diet-and-ten-other-roads-to-achieving-better-fuel-econo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/604422/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/go-on-a-diet-and-ten-other-roads-to-achieving-better-fuel-econo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>EPA</category><category>Fuel Economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>Mileage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five Diesels from Europe that will out-eco a Prius]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/25/five-diesels-from-europe-that-will-out-eco-a-prius/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/25/five-diesels-from-europe-that-will-out-eco-a-prius/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/25/five-diesels-from-europe-that-will-out-eco-a-prius/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/smart/" rel="tag">Smart</a></p>Your Prius may be <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/sbs.htm">rated</a> at 60 mpg in the city and 51 mpg whilecruising the countryside, but chances are you're not realizing those numbers the EPA obtained by strappingToyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive to a dynamometer. In <ahref="http://www.answers.com/topic/fuel-efficiency">Europe</a>, where fuel economy is calculated by actually operatingan engine on the road while it's under the hood of a vehicle, the Prius <ahref="http://www.toyota-europe.com/cars/new_cars/prius/fullspecs.asp">returns</a> a more realistic 47 mpg in the cityand 56 mpg on the highway, or 5.0L/100km city and 4.2L/100km highway in the continent's native metric. <br /><br/>This more realistic fuel economy rating lowers the bar enough for a handful of European small cars to beat the Priusin a game at which many Americans believe it's indomitable. And guess what, these cars from the old world all usehighly fuel-efficient diesel engines.<br /><br />(All mileage numbers represent official European rating converted intomiles/gallon via <a href="http://www.pege.org/fuel/convert.htm">this</a> conversion site)<br /><br /><img vspace="4"hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/AudiA2_TDI.jpg" />Audi&nbsp; A21.2 TDI<br />city: 65.33 <br />highway: 87.11 <br />average: 78.4<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><imgvspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/9133821227.jpg" />Smartfortwo CDI<br />city: 60.31 <br />highway: 75.87 <br />average: 69.18<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><img vspace="4"hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/p202_propia.jpg" /><br />Peugeot107 Urban 1.4 HDi 54 / Citro&euml;n&nbsp; C1 HDi 55 SX<br />city: 44.38 <br />highway: 69.18 <br />average: 57.37)<br/><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" alt=""src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/peugeot-high-mileage.JPG" />Citro&euml;n&nbsp; C2 HDi 70 SensoDrive VTR <br/>city: 48 <br />highway: 61.9 <br />average: 56<br /><br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="left"alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/1086357734-3023.jpg" /><br />KIA&nbsp; Picanto 1.1 CRDi EX <br/>city: 48 <br />highway: 31.9 <br />average: 56<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />If many in this countryare so concerned about eking the most amount of miles from a gallon of fuel, why hasn't the modern diesel enjoyedthe same success here as the hybrid? The easy answer would be the ghost of diesel's past, particularly a badbatch of oil burners designed by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldsmobile_Diesel_V6_engine">Oldsmobile</a> inthe 1980's. <br /><br />The more complicated response is that <ahref="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-low_sulfur_diesel">Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel</a> fuel hasn't been readilyavailable in the U.S. like it is in Europe. This special blend of diesel contains less sulfur, which reduces emissions,but also allows for better emissions control systems to be used on a diesel engine. Fortunately ULSD will be the newstandard in the U.S. come this fall. Some companies, like DaimlerChrysler, are waiting in the wings with 50-stateapproved diesels that are powerful, clean and get grand gas mileage. Will diesels finally become the eco-peer ofhybrids? Who will be the first to marry the two in an ultra-efficient diesel hybrid production car? Time will tell, butwe can all breathe easier knowing more green options are sprouting up every year.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/25/five-diesels-from-europe-that-will-out-eco-a-prius/">Five Diesels from Europe that will out-eco a Prius</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/25/five-diesels-from-europe-that-will-out-eco-a-prius/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/602336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/25/five-diesels-from-europe-that-will-out-eco-a-prius/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesel</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel milage</category><category>fuel mileage</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>FuelMileage</category><category>hybrid</category><category>mileage</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>MilesPerGallon</category><category>toyota prius</category><category>ToyotaPrius</category><category>ultra low sulfur fuel</category><category>UltraLowSulfurFuel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>