<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[What could have been - AMX/3]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/27/what-could-have-been-amx-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/27/what-could-have-been-amx-3/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/27/what-could-have-been-amx-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/conceptcars/" rel="tag">Concept Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/timewarp/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a></p><a href="http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2007/10/27/amx3-pushmobile-found-replicas-forthcoming/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/yellowamx3a_resized.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><strong>UPDATE: </strong>It turns out there <em>were</em> actually some running and driving versions of this car, link in text below.<br /><br />The fact that AMC never produced this car is probably part of the reason why they were able to hang on as the last independent automaker until the twilight of the 1980s. Looking at it now, though, makes us wish they'd gone after the mid-engined supercar segment with their iconoclastic flair. Sure, that'd mean an interior done up in noxious orange tartan, but look at that design! Richard Teague and crew managed to create a very muscular form evocative of what may have happened had a Toronado mated with <em>Signor Miura</em>. There were several <a href="http://www.amxfiles.com/amc/amx3.html">development cars</a> created, but no production version. What has recently surfaced is one of the "pushcars" used at events to show off the exterior styling. Pushcars were basically fiberglass bodies splashed from molds of the clay bucks. Underneath the exterior was a wooden framework and rudimentary axles front and rear. <br /><br />Other pushcars from the same program have surfaced, one was even stuck atop a pole at a used car dealership before being rescued and restored (as a pushcar, that is.) The AMX/3, however, remained sealed away in Bruce Wayne's underground lair, it would seem, until earlier this year. The seller, second owner of the AMX/3, had intended on mounting the body to a Pantera chassis, but decided to sell it instead. New owner Tom Dulaney intends to restore the pushcar back to its original setup, but not before taking molds from the body to possibly create replica pieces. So, in the end, we may actually be able to own the sexiest AMC that never was, even if it is underpinned by a Fiero. Actually, there's no word on what would serve as a chassis, so let your imaginations run. We know what will be circling our heads as we fall asleep tonight. <br /><br />[Source: Hemmings]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/27/what-could-have-been-amx-3/">What could have been - AMX/3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2007/10/27/amx3-pushmobile-found-replicas-forthcoming/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/27/what-could-have-been-amx-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1023440/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/27/what-could-have-been-amx-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMC</category><category>American Motors</category><category>AmericanMotors</category><category>AMX</category><category>AMX/3</category><category>concept car</category><category>ConceptCar</category><category>fiberglass</category><category>mid engine</category><category>MidEngine</category><category>pushcar</category><category>study</category><category>styling buck</category><category>StylingBuck</category><category>supercar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1023440/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/10/27/what-could-have-been-amx-3/1023440/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1023440</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/yellowamx3a_resized_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Trademark dumpster diving reveals a few gems]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/08/trademark-dumpster-diving-reveals-a-few-gems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/08/trademark-dumpster-diving-reveals-a-few-gems/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/08/trademark-dumpster-diving-reveals-a-few-gems/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a></p><a href="www.leftlanenews.com"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/dumpster_diving.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>The <a href="http://www.leftlanenews.com">news that is not 'right'</a> has uncovered some interesting automotive tidbits while scouring through obscure trademark filings.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/07/trademarks-general-motors-working-on-8-speed-transmission/">First</a>, General Motors has patented the term "8 speed" for use with what is presumed to be an eight-speed transmission. Logical, no? That would put their premium brands, Buick and Cadillac, on par with Lexus' newest tranny int their flagship the LS460.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/07/trademarks-pontiac-firebird-fiero-set-to-return/">Second up</a>, LLN says that on October 6th, 2006 (whaaa?), GM filed a 'published for opposition' writ through the trademark office for the word 'Firebird.' We have no idea what the designation 'published for opposition' means (is there a patent lawyer in the house?), but LLN contends that it's a necessary step when reregistering a title. This may be what Bob Lutz has been mentioning under the name 'GTO,' but what's more interesting is the 'Fiero' moniker has also been re-applied for. This may be the first step in the General's plan of offering a small, hard-top coupe, but if it's just a Solstice with a fixed lid, our interest is only mildly piqued. Doesn't the name Fiero imply a mid-ship layout? We think so.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/07/trademarks-lexus-slogan-change-in-the-works/">Finally</a>, Lexus may not be pursuing the whole perfection thing soon, as they've applied for two new slogans: "The Passionate Pursuit of Potential" and "The Pursuit of Potential." We think it may be best to let our readers do the analysis on those.<br /><br />Ready, set, speculate!<br /><br />[Source: LeftLaneNews]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/08/trademark-dumpster-diving-reveals-a-few-gems/">Trademark dumpster diving reveals a few gems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/08/trademark-dumpster-diving-reveals-a-few-gems/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/665561/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/08/trademark-dumpster-diving-reveals-a-few-gems/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>8 speed transmission</category><category>8SpeedTransmission</category><category>fiero</category><category>firebird</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>gto</category><category>lexus</category><category>mid engine</category><category>mid ship</category><category>MidEngine</category><category>MidShip</category><category>slogan</category><category>slogans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:54:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/665561/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/09/08/trademark-dumpster-diving-reveals-a-few-gems/665561/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>665561</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/dumpster_diving_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lotus will build Esprit replacement in U.K.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/19/lotus-will-build-esprit-replacement-in-u-k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/19/lotus-will-build-esprit-replacement-in-u-k/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/19/lotus-will-build-esprit-replacement-in-u-k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lotus/" rel="tag">Lotus</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/grouplotushethelsite_72.JPG" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />A small sigh of relief could be heard from the U.K. auto industry Thursday when Group Lotus announced that its new mid-engined sports car would be built at the company's headquarters in Norfolk, U.K. (shown at right).<br /><br />The new car replaces Lotus' discontinued high-end Esprit model, and is scheduled to begin production in 2008. <br /><br />With Vauxhall downsizing its U.K. workforce and TVR shuttering its Blackpool factory amid talks of resuming production at an unspecified overseas location, there was concern that Group Lotus owner, Proton, could mandate production of the new Lotus at its Malaysian facilities.<br /><br />In announcing the company's decision, newly-named CEO Mike Kimberley remarked that Lotus has made "firm future<br />commitments [to the Board of Directors] to improve the efficiencies and flexibilities within our manufacturing facility."<br /><br />[Source: Group Lotus]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/19/lotus-will-build-esprit-replacement-in-u-k/">Lotus will build Esprit replacement in U.K.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 19 May 2006 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/19/lotus-will-build-esprit-replacement-in-u-k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/619613/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/19/lotus-will-build-esprit-replacement-in-u-k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>British Car</category><category>British Sports car</category><category>BritishCar</category><category>BritishSportsCar</category><category>Eclat</category><category>Elan</category><category>Elise</category><category>esprit</category><category>mid engine</category><category>mid-engine</category><category>sports car</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 11:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/619613/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/05/19/lotus-will-build-esprit-replacement-in-u-k/619613/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>619613</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/grouplotushethelsite_72_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
