<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[UPDATE: Mercury Meta One not happening]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/20/update-mercury-meta-one-not-happening/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/20/update-mercury-meta-one-not-happening/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/20/update-mercury-meta-one-not-happening/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercury/" rel="tag">Mercury</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/1872222788832088.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /><br /><br />We've been wrapped up in our own opinions about Mercury too much around here. So much so, that when we saw <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/19/spy-shots-2009-magellan-meta-one/">shots</a> of Mercury's Meta One mules running around Detroit again, we instantly assumed the project was back on the front burner. Apparently that's not the case. A few of our sources have informed us that the mules running around Detroit right now are the same ones we saw at the beginning of the year before the car was cancelled. Since the Freestyle will be getting the company's new 3.5-liter V6 powerplant, Ford decided to put the Mercury mules back in service jut to test the engines on the Freestyle platform, and apparently mess with our heads. Mission accomplished. Sorry Mercury, no seven-passenger CUV love for you.<br /><br />[Source: a little birdy]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/20/update-mercury-meta-one-not-happening/">UPDATE: Mercury Meta One not happening</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/20/update-mercury-meta-one-not-happening/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/688326/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/20/update-mercury-meta-one-not-happening/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cuv</category><category>duratec</category><category>freestyle</category><category>meta one</category><category>MetaOne</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:26:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/688326/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/10/20/update-mercury-meta-one-not-happening/688326/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>688326</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/1872222788832088_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[What if... Ford had made all the Right Moves]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/fordrightmoves1.jpg" /><br /><br />If Ford had made all the Right Moves from around the turn of the century to the present, it wouldn't need a Bold Move to pull it back from the brink. This post will imagine a Ford lineup of today that could have been had the Blue Oval been bold back then. Such a lineup, we believe, would have made Ford a top contender today in terms of product. Instead, for many reasons, Ford is forced to turn itself around while mired in a product lineup that's ill suited for today's tastes. So let's put on our imagination caps and envision the lineup that Ford took a pass on.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What if... Ford had made all the Right Moves</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/">What if... Ford had made all the Right Moves</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/684579/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>427</category><category>fairlane</category><category>fiesta</category><category>five-hundred</category><category>freeestyle</category><category>fusion</category><category>meta one</category><category>MetaOne</category><category>mondeo</category><category>montego</category><category>what if</category><category>WhatIf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/684579/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/10/13/what-if-ford-had-made-all-the-right-moves/684579/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>684579</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/fordrightmoves1_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
