<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Court strikes down Michigan "fuzzy dice" ban... then reinstates it...]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/court-strikes-down-michigan-fuzzy-dice-ban-then-reinstates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/court-strikes-down-michigan-fuzzy-dice-ban-then-reinstates/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/court-strikes-down-michigan-fuzzy-dice-ban-then-reinstates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://michiganmessenger.com/10891/court-strikes-down-michigan-law-on-dangling-car-ornaments"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/mich_fzdilw.jpg" /></a>A man named Lonnie Ray Davis was pulled over by Michigan police. When they searched his car, they found an open alcohol container, crack, a wad of cash, a stun gun, and a .38 caliber handgun. He was, of course, arrested. But the reason they pulled him over has become a constitutional law issue: Davis had a Tweety Bird ornament dangling from his rear view mirror, and Michigan law forbids dangling things that "obstruct the vision of the driver of the vehicle."<br /><br />Davis' argument was that the Tweety Bird didn't obstruct his vision, so the cops had no right to pull him over, and therefore the items they found should be suppressed. The 6th Court of Appeals initially struck down the Michigan law since it does not define "to what degree the driver's vision must be obstructed or for how long." Noting that a great many cars have objects dangling from their mirrors, and so may be in unwitting violation of the law, "the statute itself provides no guidance either to motorists or police as to which ones" violate the law, and so must be scrapped. <br /><br />The court didn't suppress the evidence, and shortly after its ruling it rescinded its decision striking down the ban. The reason is thought to be that the court was required to let Michigan plead its case for the ban before the court struck it down. The court has not given a reason for its reversed decision. As far as the now-reinstated fuzzy dice ban, for now it remains a reason for the police to pull you over if and when they decide. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://michiganmessenger.com/10891/court-strikes-down-michigan-law-on-dangling-car-ornaments">Michigan Messenger</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/court-strikes-down-michigan-fuzzy-dice-ban-then-reinstates/">Court strikes down Michigan "fuzzy dice" ban... then reinstates it...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://michiganmessenger.com/10891/court-strikes-down-michigan-law-on-dangling-car-ornaments>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/court-strikes-down-michigan-fuzzy-dice-ban-then-reinstates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1417462/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/court-strikes-down-michigan-fuzzy-dice-ban-then-reinstates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>constitution</category><category>court</category><category>etc</category><category>fuzzy dice</category><category>FuzzyDice</category><category>government</category><category>laws</category><category>legal</category><category>michigan</category><category>police</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[California joins other states with hands-free cellphone law]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/california-joins-other-states-with-hands-free-cellphone-law/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/california-joins-other-states-with-hands-free-cellphone-law/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/california-joins-other-states-with-hands-free-cellphone-law/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-handfeeelaw1-2008jul01,0,5500509.story"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/2051037_opt.jpg" /></a><br /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>California joined thirty-two other states today when a new law banning unlimited cellphone use in automobiles went into effect at midnight. The new rules prohibit drivers from holding cellphones to their ears while talking, yet they are still allowed to dial the phone to place the call... and freely text message. While the law won't likely have a huge effect on many adult drivers who have become accustomed to using speaker-phones and hands-free devices such as Bluetooth-enabled earpieces (<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2005/06/09/hands-free-or-not-cell-phones-still-distracting/">as if that really helps</a>), it is the young drivers who face tough new rules. The law in the Golden State now bans drivers under the age of 18 from using any kind of mobile device while driving. All drivers face the same slap-on-the-wrist if caught. The first offense is only $20, with the fee bumped to $50 for additional convictions. Of course, that number will rapidly increase if other infractions or penalties are applied. </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-handfeeelaw1-2008jul01,0,5500509.story">Los Angeles Times</a>, Photo by David McNew/Getty]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/california-joins-other-states-with-hands-free-cellphone-law/">California joins other states with hands-free cellphone law</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-handfeeelaw1-2008jul01,0,5500509.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/california-joins-other-states-with-hands-free-cellphone-law/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1242333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/california-joins-other-states-with-hands-free-cellphone-law/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bluetooth</category><category>california</category><category>Cellphone</category><category>hands-free</category><category>laws</category><category>legislation</category><category>speakerphone</category><category>teenagers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New laws to make cars more kid-friendly set to pass]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/15/new-laws-to-make-cars-more-kid-friendly-set-to-pass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/15/new-laws-to-make-cars-more-kid-friendly-set-to-pass/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/15/new-laws-to-make-cars-more-kid-friendly-set-to-pass/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080215/ANA02/678364030/1181/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/child_volvo.gif" /></a>My son asked what would happen if his finger were in the path of the electric window when it closed. I suggested we stick a piece of Red Vine licorice in the window to find out. The results weren't pretty, though to this day I'm still finding tiny bits of red licorice stuck in the channels of the window frame. Boys...</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;">In a move aimed at preventing incidents like these in vehicles, a bill was sent to President Bush earlier this week with brand new safety regulations for automakers. Under the new bill, power windows would be required to automatically reverse themselves if resistance is encountered from a finger or, say, a Twizzlers. Some high-end automakers already include this type of window safety system in their vehicles, thought they are not currently mandated industry-wide. <br /></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;">A second provision says that there must be a minimum standard for driver visibility to the rear of the vehicle, presumably to help parents avoid backing up over Timmy's Big Wheel... or Timmy himself. Automakers could meet this new rule with additional mirrors, cameras, or sensors to the vehicle. New uses for Infiniti's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/12/nissan-releases-details-about-around-view-monitor/">Around View Monitor</a> come to mind. The third and final provision is designed to prevent accidental shifting of vehicles out of park, and would likely turn your floor-mounted shifter into the auto-equivalent of a child-proof lighter.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;">The entire auto industry is reportedly behind the legislation and it's obviously already passed both houses of Congress, so analysts expect the President to sign it without any changes. While these new laws will undoubtedly make vehicles less dangerous for children, an alert driver still remains the most important piece in the safety puzzle.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;"></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoPlainText"><span sans-serif="" arial="" style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;">[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080215/ANA02/678364030/1181/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01">Automotive News</a>, sub. req'd]
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/15/new-laws-to-make-cars-more-kid-friendly-set-to-pass/">New laws to make cars more kid-friendly set to pass</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/15/new-laws-to-make-cars-more-kid-friendly-set-to-pass/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1116381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/15/new-laws-to-make-cars-more-kid-friendly-set-to-pass/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto child safety laws</category><category>AutoChildSafetyLaws</category><category>child</category><category>Children</category><category>laws</category><category>legislation</category><category>park</category><category>reverse</category><category>safety</category><category>visibility</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rockford, Illinois decrees: Don't pump up the volume]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/20/rockford-illinois-decrees-dont-pump-up-the-volume/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/20/rockford-illinois-decrees-dont-pump-up-the-volume/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/20/rockford-illinois-decrees-dont-pump-up-the-volume/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/19/1955.asp"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/rockford_stereo_confiscatio.jpg" alt="" /></a>It's hard out there for a pimped out ride. As of this month, Rockford, Illinois will start seizing vehicles that play music too loudly. The kicker is that your car can be seized <em>if someone merely accuses you</em> of playing loud music, because "hearsay evidence shall be admissible."
<p> </p>
<p>The ordinance is worded in a way that actually disallows many OEM stereos: "<font size="2">"No person shall operate... any device used to... reproduce any recorded sound if the device is located... in any motor vehicle on the public way and the sound can be heard from 75 feet or more from the device." And </font>you don't have to be playing music at the time -- someone could have heard you blasting tunes on your way down the street and reported it to the police. By the time the police show up your stereo's been silent for hours. But if the police determine there's probable cause that it was you, your car goes away.</p>
<p>The fine is $150 to $750, plus $75 for towing and $20 per day for storage. If the officer has to wait more than an hour for the tow truck, it's another $60 per hour for his or her time. And if you want to fight it, the city keeps your car while you go through the appeals process, charging you for storage fees, of course. Silent running might be the phrase to keep in mind while rolling through Rockford. </p>
<p><em>Thanks for the tip, F451!</em></p>
<p>[Source: The Newspaper]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/20/rockford-illinois-decrees-dont-pump-up-the-volume/">Rockford, Illinois decrees: Don't pump up the volume</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/19/1955.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/20/rockford-illinois-decrees-dont-pump-up-the-volume/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/994053/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/20/rockford-illinois-decrees-dont-pump-up-the-volume/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>illinois</category><category>laws</category><category>legal</category><category>loud stereos</category><category>LoudStereos</category><category>rockford</category><category>rockford illinois</category><category>RockfordIllinois</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Texting while driving in the UK could get you 2 years in jail]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drive</a></p><p><a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23411328-details/Drivers+risk+two+years+in+jail+for+using+their+mobile+phones/article.do"><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/uk_texting_jail.jpg" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The current fine for using a mobile phone while driving in the UK is &pound;60 and three points on your license. If you are caught driving unsafely while using a mobile phone or typing directions in the navi, the fine jumps to &pound;2,500. Now, after a review by the Crown Prosecution Service which looked at types of bad driving and penalties, a new charge of "dangerous driving" has been added. That charge would require the driver to be doing something likely to kill or seriously endanger somebody, while fiddling with a device like a phone or MP3 player. If that was found, then the driver could spend two years in jail.</p>
<p>The finding of dangerous driving will be up to the prosecutor to prove and a jury to issue. However, it gives the courts a step between a fine and a 14-year sentence, which is the punishment for the more serious offense of death by dangerous driving. Its value as a deterrent is, of course, being debated. Some say the risk of 2 years in the pokey might finally get people to pay attention behind the wheel. Others say that enforcement of the current laws is so lax that people won't likely pay attention to this one. Any way you care to look at it, though, the UK is the last place you want to be swapping photos and trying to find the right playlist at the wheel. </p>
<p>[Source: This is London]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/">Texting while driving in the UK could get you 2 years in jail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23411328-details/Drivers+risk+two+years+in+jail+for+using+their+mobile+phones/article.do>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/984642/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>courts</category><category>fines</category><category>jail</category><category>laws</category><category>texting</category><category>uk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New fines for teen speeders in MA come in one size: XXXL]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/20/new-fines-for-teen-speeders-in-ma-come-in-one-size-xxxl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/20/new-fines-for-teen-speeders-in-ma-come-in-one-size-xxxl/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/20/new-fines-for-teen-speeders-in-ma-come-in-one-size-xxxl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drive</a></p><p><a href="http://www.telegram.com/article/20070715/COLUMN01/707150455&amp;SearchID=73287748515418"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/mass_teen_speeding_law.jpg" /></a>Based on recent moves in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/27/welcome-to-indiana-home-of-the-1-000-speeding-ticket-and-that/">Indiana</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/">Virginia</a>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/aussie-speeding-psa-hits-below-the-belt/">PSA's in Australia</a>, and now Massachusetts, speeding of the teen and adult varieties is the latest headline-grabbing menace to society. Massachusetts' Junior Operators' License Law, which outlines the punishments meted out to traffic offenders under the age of 18, was recently strengthened. <br /></p>
<p><br />One of the first victims was Jackie Crawford, four weeks shy of her 18th birthday, who was given a ticket for going 35 in a 25. First came the $100 fine. Then came the 3-month license suspension. Then came mandatory attendance in the State Courts Against Road Rage program, as well as a driver attitude retraining course -- both of which her mother had to drive her to because Jackie's license was suspended. Then came the $500 fee to have her license reinstated. But she won't actually get her license back until she retakes both the written and the driving tests again... and pays the fees for those as well. In MA, 25 means 25, especially if you're under 18. </p>
<p><em>Thanks for the tip, Dylan!</em></p>
<p>[Source: Worcester Telegram via <a href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/3898/massachusetts-teens-face-massive-speeding-fines/">Car Advice</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/20/new-fines-for-teen-speeders-in-ma-come-in-one-size-xxxl/">New fines for teen speeders in MA come in one size: XXXL</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.telegram.com/article/20070715/COLUMN01/707150455&amp;SearchID=73287748515418>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/20/new-fines-for-teen-speeders-in-ma-come-in-one-size-xxxl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/944963/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/20/new-fines-for-teen-speeders-in-ma-come-in-one-size-xxxl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>laws</category><category>massachussets</category><category>speeding</category><category>states</category><category>teens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:04:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>