<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Report: Alan Mullaly, Bill Ford Jr. get huge bonuses from Blue Oval <i>*Update</i>]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/08/alan-mullaly-bill-ford-jr-get-huge-bonuses-from-blue-oval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/08/alan-mullaly-bill-ford-jr-get-huge-bonuses-from-blue-oval/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/08/alan-mullaly-bill-ford-jr-get-huge-bonuses-from-blue-oval/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2011/03/ford-give-mulally-huge-stock-grant-.html"><img alt="Bill Ford Jr. and Alan Mulally" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/03/ford-and-mulally-getty.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford Motor Company</a> Executive Chairman Bill Ford, Jr. and Chief Executive Alan Mulally have reportedly been given big-time bonuses by the Blue Oval for keeping things moving when <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> filed for bankruptcy. Mulally received $56.5 million worth of Ford stock before taxes and Ford got stock worth $42.4 million.<br />
<br />
Ford, Jr. hired Mulally from Boeing in 2006, before they went around to different banks to secure restructuring loans to stay solvent through the lending crisis and economic recession. In 2010, Ford saw its best year since 1999, clearing $6.6 billion in profits.<br />
<br />
To add to their enormous bonuses, <strike>the <em>Los Angeles Times</em> says that Ford, Jr. and Mulally opted to purchase Ford stock at $14.76 a share</strike>. <strong>*<em>Update:</em></strong><em> Ford tells us that Ford, Jr. and Mulally do indeed have stock options but have not cashed them in at this time</em>. Market value of Ford stock rose three percent today to $14.46 a share.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2011/03/ford-give-mulally-huge-stock-grant-.html">Los Angeles Times</a> | Image: Bill Pugliano/Getty]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/08/alan-mullaly-bill-ford-jr-get-huge-bonuses-from-blue-oval/">Report: Alan Mullaly, Bill Ford Jr. get huge bonuses from Blue Oval <i>*Update</i></a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2011/03/ford-give-mulally-huge-stock-grant-.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/08/alan-mullaly-bill-ford-jr-get-huge-bonuses-from-blue-oval/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19872493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/08/alan-mullaly-bill-ford-jr-get-huge-bonuses-from-blue-oval/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan mulally</category><category>bill ford jr</category><category>blue oval</category><category>executive bonuses</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ford</category><category>la times</category><category>mulally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Richardson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19872493/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/03/08/alan-mullaly-bill-ford-jr-get-huge-bonuses-from-blue-oval/19872493/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19872493</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/03/ford-and-mulally-getty_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: AZ residents revolting against speed cameras, only 38% pay tickets]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/25/report-az-residents-revolting-against-speed-cameras-only-38-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/25/report-az-residents-revolting-against-speed-cameras-only-38-p/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/25/report-az-residents-revolting-against-speed-cameras-only-38-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-traffic-cameras20-2010feb20,0,2401900,full.story"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/58805-content-image-630op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Arizona is the first state in the U.S. to utilize <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/08/arizona-to-abandon-groundbreaking-speed-camera-program/">photo enforcement</a> of traffic laws on state highways. The cameras are paired to radar detectors that snap an image of offending vehicles traveling at 11 mph over the speed limit, and the ticket is then <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/26/speed-cameras-in-arizona-nab-driver-22-times-in-45-days/">mailed to the home</a> of the registered auto. And not just any old fine, either. We're talking $181.50, so we're sure you can see why Arizona residents aren't too excited about the state's fledgling revenue stream.</p>
<p>After nearly two years with photo enforcement, motorists have begun covering the cameras with Post-it notes, boxes and even silly string. One man reportedly gave a camera a beat-down with a pick ax. A report by the <em>Los Angeles Times</em> claims that only 38 percent of fines have been paid thus far, and the revenue generated from big brother law enforcement is closer to $20 milllion rather than the expected $80 million per year. The report shows that an overwhelming number of ticketed drivers are looking to fight their fines in court, and in some cases the courts are reportedly booked up through 2011. A local judge has even sided with speed camera haters. John Keegan, a judge for the Arrowhead Justice Court, has thrown out all 7,000 violations that he has presided over, saying that the cameras were a violation to constitutional rights.</p>
<p>So after all the trouble these cameras have caused, why haven't they been removed from the road? Arizona law enforcement apparently like the cameras, for one. Lt. Jeff King of the Arizona Department of Public Safety reportedly told the <em>Times</em> that traffic fatalities are down to the lowest point in 15 years as a result of the cameras and tougher drinking and driving laws. All the pressure coming from citizens to get rid of the speed traps could be weighing on politicians, though, as some lawmakers are looking into the possibility of altering the current photo radar system. Governor Jan Brewer is even encouraging legislators to put the speed cameras to a vote in November.</p>
<p>We're guessing if the speed cameras make their way to the ballot, the cameras could well be the biggest reason voters hit the polls this November.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-traffic-cameras20-2010feb20,0,2401900,full.story">Los Angeles Times</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/25/report-az-residents-revolting-against-speed-cameras-only-38-p/">Report: AZ residents revolting against speed cameras, only 38% pay tickets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-traffic-cameras20-2010feb20,0,2401900,full.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/25/report-az-residents-revolting-against-speed-cameras-only-38-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19372065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/25/report-az-residents-revolting-against-speed-cameras-only-38-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arizona</category><category>la times</category><category>LaTimes</category><category>speed camera</category><category>speed trap</category><category>SpeedCamera</category><category>SpeedTrap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19372065/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/02/25/report-az-residents-revolting-against-speed-cameras-only-38-p/19372065/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19372065</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/58805-content-image-630op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Pulitzer winner Dan Neil reportedly leaves <i>Los Angeles Times</i> for <i>Wall Street Journal</i>]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/05/pulitzer-winner-dan-neil-leaves-los-angeles-times-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/05/pulitzer-winner-dan-neil-leaves-los-angeles-times-for/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/05/pulitzer-winner-dan-neil-leaves-los-angeles-times-for/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a></p><a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=177299"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/dan-neil.jpg" />Dan Neil</a>, an automotive journalist who <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/08/arts/08PULI.html?ex=1396756800&amp;en=b0704c49a59b3ca1&amp;ei=5007&amp;partner=USERLAND">won the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism</a> in 2004 for his weekly column <em>Rumble Seat</em> in the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, is reportedly leaving his job in Los Angeles to serve as the automotive columnist for <em>The</em> <em>Wall Street Journal</em>.<br />
<br />
Perhaps it bears mentioning that the <em>LA Times</em> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/">killed off its Auto section</a> back in the summer of 2008, though Neil's columns continued to appear in the Business section.<br />
<br />
Mike Miller, Deputy Managing Editor for <em>The</em> <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, had this to say in an email message to WSJ's Bureau Chiefs:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<div><em>Dan is the nation's preeminent car columnist, whose deep knowledge, wit, writerly flair and insight have made him must-reading for everyone who cares about cars and many who don't. He joins us from the Los Angeles Times, where his car reviews won the Pulitzer Prize for criticism in 2004. Before that he worked at the Raleigh News &amp; Observer and Car and Driver magazine, among other publications. He will start writing for us in print and online this spring.</em></div>
</blockquote><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/revolving_door/pulitzer_mechanic_columnist_jumps_publications_coasts_151120.asp">Romenesko</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/05/pulitzer-winner-dan-neil-leaves-los-angeles-times-for/">Pulitzer winner Dan Neil reportedly leaves <i>Los Angeles Times</i> for <i>Wall Street Journal</i></a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=177299>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/05/pulitzer-winner-dan-neil-leaves-los-angeles-times-for/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19345739/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/05/pulitzer-winner-dan-neil-leaves-los-angeles-times-for/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dan neil</category><category>dan neil wall street journal</category><category>DanNeil</category><category>DanNeilWallStreetJournal</category><category>LA Times</category><category>LaTimes</category><category>los angeles times</category><category>LosAngelesTimes</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19345739/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/02/05/pulitzer-winner-dan-neil-leaves-los-angeles-times-for/19345739/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19345739</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/dan-neil_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>LA Times </i> details Toyota history of concealing safety issues]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/image002_opt_opta.jpg" /></div>
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/25/breaking-toyota-to-recall-3-8m-vehicles-to-reshape-and-replace/">unintended acceleration issue</a> has reached critical mass for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a>, but is it an isolated incident for an automaker with an otherwise stellar record for being frank with its customers? A recent investigation by the <em>Los Angeles Times</em> shows that Toyota may have concealed safety issues on several occasions in an effort to keep its name clean. The newspaper is reporting that it uncovered several incidents in which Toyota concealed defects or delayed recalls even after several complaints were made.<br />
<br />
For instance, there was an issue with a plastic panel that could be dislodged, potentially leading to unintended acceleration issues in some 2003 model <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/sienna">Toyota Sienna</a> minivans. Engineers reportedly discovered the problem and fixed the issue after 26,000 units were made. Toyota didn't announce a recall until six years later. Then there was a steering issue with <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/4runner">2004 Toyota 4Runner</a> models. Toyota recalled the vehicles in Japan but insisted that no recall was necessary in the U.S. even after there were dozens of complaints that showed the problem was real. The Japanese automaker finally recalled the SUVs in 2005. More recent was a suit filed by Dimitrios Biller; the ex-Toyota lawyer who alleges that his former employer <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/31/report-toyota-accused-of-ruthless-conspiracy-to-conceal-dest/"> hid safety data</a> and evidence in rollover cases.<br />
<br />
And that's not nearly all. Click past the break to keep reading about more possible safety defects the <em>LA Times</em> suggests may have been concealed by Toyota.<br /><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>LA Times </i> details Toyota history of concealing safety issues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/"><i>LA Times </i> details Toyota history of concealing safety issues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toyota-secrecy23-2009dec23,0,557792,full.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19293090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash</category><category>la times</category><category>LaTimes</category><category>los angeles times</category><category>LosAngelesTimes</category><category>safety</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota floor mat</category><category>toyota floor mat recall</category><category>toyota floor mats</category><category>toyota floormat</category><category>toyota floormat recall</category><category>toyota floormats</category><category>Toyota safety</category><category>toyota safety concealed</category><category>toyota safety concerns</category><category>toyota unintended acceleraton</category><category>ToyotaFloorMat</category><category>ToyotaFloorMatRecall</category><category>ToyotaFloorMats</category><category>ToyotaSafety</category><category>ToyotaSafetyConcealed</category><category>ToyotaSafetyConcerns</category><category>ToyotaUnintendedAcceleraton</category><category>unintended acceleration</category><category>unintended-acceleration</category><category>UnintendedAcceleration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19293090/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/12/24/la-times-details-toyota-history-of-concealing-safety-issues/19293090/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19293090</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/image002_opt_opta_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times kills autos section]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lifestyle/" rel="tag">Lifestyle</a></p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/highway1/la-hy-note9-2008jul09,0,2161716.story"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/highway1rip.jpg" /></a><br />No flowers, no cake, not even a eulogy. The <em>Los Angeles Times</em> has delivered its auto section an ignominious ending. Tucked among Dan Neil's Pulitzer-winning prose was a small, unceremonious Editor's Note notifying readers of the change in a matter-of-fact fashion. Circulation figures are down, advertising revenues are <em>way</em> down, and the <em>LA Times</em>' ownership, Chicago's Tribune Company, has been desperately slashing for years now, trying to return profitability. Fans of Dan Neil will now be able to find his Rumble Seat reviews and rants in the Business section, along with other automotive content. At least they're smart enough to hang on to one of the best automotive writers out there, even if he does occasionally <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Columns/articleId=105386/subsubtypeId=218">give advertisers hissy fits</a>. <em>Thanks for the tip, Dave. </em><br /><br />[Source: LA Times]<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/">Los Angeles Times kills autos section</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/highway1/la-hy-note9-2008jul09,0,2161716.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1250949/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dan neil</category><category>DanNeil</category><category>la times</category><category>la times auto</category><category>la times auto section</category><category>la times highway 1</category><category>LaTimes</category><category>LaTimesAuto</category><category>LaTimesAutoSection</category><category>LaTimesHighway1</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1250949/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/07/10/los-angeles-times-kills-autos-section/1250949/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1250949</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/highway1rip_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
