<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[From Super Duty to Call of Duty: Ford could power U.S. military's future]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/military/" rel="tag">Military</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/#continued"><img alt="Joint Light Tactical Vehicle proposal" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/jltv.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 444px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The future of the U.S. Army's Joint Light Tactical Vehicle program might be powered by a <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> V8. BAE Systems, Northrup Grumman and Meritor Defenses said this afternoon that their proposed light fighting vehicle, which is called the Valanx, will have a Ford <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/power+stroke+diesel/">Power Stroke 6.7-liter diesel engine</a> under its steel hood. (And likely a .50 cal on its roof.)<br />
<br />
If it's good enough for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-series+super+duty/">Super Duty</a>, it's good enough for a Call of Duty.<br />
<br />
"Ford products have a reputation for dependability and performance, even under challenging conditions," said Ann Hoholick, BAE Systems Vice President of Amphibious &amp; New Programs in the release.<br />
<br />
Ford had dropped out of the JLTV program, which is searching for the next fighting machine to replace the venerable <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/humvee">Humvee</a> for the U.S. military. Ford is not a partner with the group but did provide a statement this afternoon.<br />
<br />
"We're proud of Ford's 6.7-liter Power Stroke V8 diesel engines and their best-in-class power, durability and fuel economy," said Ford spokesman Mike Levine. "And we are proud the engines were chosen to be part of BAE's JLTV entry."<br />
<br />
Let's just hope that engine is as bulletproof.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>From Super Duty to Call of Duty: Ford could power U.S. military's future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/">From Super Duty to Call of Duty: Ford could power U.S. military's future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20201413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bae systems</category><category>ford</category><category>jltv</category><category>Joint Light Tactical Vehicle</category><category>power stroke</category><category>power stroke 6.7</category><category>power stroke diesel</category><category>super duty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Burgess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20201413/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/26/from-super-duty-to-call-of-duty-ford-could-power-u-s-military/20201413/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20201413</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/jltv_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Just the facts: AM General responds to Humvee spy shots]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/24/just-the-facts-am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-shots/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/24/just-the-facts-am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-shots/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/24/just-the-facts-am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-shots/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/conceptcars/" rel="tag">Concept Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/spyphotos/" rel="tag">Spy Photos</a></p><a href="http://www.worldcarfans.com/8070723.002/am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-photos"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/8070723.002.1m.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />It turns out that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/19/spy-shots-am-general-humvee-prototype-caught/">spy shots</a> of what we thought was an AM General prototype for the next-gen Humvee was anything but. After seeing the pics appear on the web, AM General contacted World Car Fans with an explanation of what we were looking at. The vehicle shot by Brenda Priddy &amp; Co. was in fact the Evolutionary Concept Vehicle II (EVC II), which AM General's been exhibiting in public at U.S. Army events since last year. It doesn't seem to be an official next-gen prototype of anything, but just a concept vehicle the company uses to generate interest.<br /><br />We also thought that the Pentagon's project for the next-gen Humvee was called the Future Tactical Truck System (FTTS). While that program does exist, the one to replace the current Humvee is called the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV). AM General is working on a JLTV prototype for the program in conjunction with General Dynamics, but has yet to show it in public. <br /><br />Despite it not being the real deal, the vehicle in the spy shots is still a bad ass truck that would like right at home on a battlefield, but we'll have to wait a while longer before we find out what the military will choose as its next whip. <br /><br />[Source: World Car Fans]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/24/just-the-facts-am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-shots/">Just the facts: AM General responds to Humvee spy shots</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.worldcarfans.com/8070723.002/am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-photos>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/24/just-the-facts-am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-shots/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/947632/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/24/just-the-facts-am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-shots/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AM General</category><category>AmGeneral</category><category>concept</category><category>FTTS</category><category>Humvee</category><category>JLTV</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:05:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/947632/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/07/24/just-the-facts-am-general-responds-to-humvee-spy-shots/947632/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>947632</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/8070723.002.1m_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>