<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Jeep recalling more than 47,000 Liberty, Commander, Grand Cherokee, and Wrangler models]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/14/jeep-recalling-more-than-47-000-liberty-commander-grand-cherok/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/14/jeep-recalling-more-than-47-000-liberty-commander-grand-cherok/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/14/jeep-recalling-more-than-47-000-liberty-commander-grand-cherok/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V118&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/cher_lib_recll.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Chrysler is recalling over 47,000 models, including the 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Commander, and Wrangler four-door that may have reversed wiring on the driver's airbag controller, a defect that may inhibit the airbag's deployment. Additionally, the 2002 and 2003 Jeep Libertys sold in New England and much of the Midwest are susceptible to a loss of lubrication in their front ball joints due to salt. The remedy for both recalls is a trip to the dealer, who will inspect and make any necessary repairs. You can read the full press releases after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V118&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email">NHTSA</a> (Cherokee, Commander, Wrangler) &amp; NHTSA (<a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V119&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email">Liberty</a>)]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/14/jeep-recalling-more-than-47-000-liberty-commander-grand-cherok/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jeep recalling more than 47,000 Liberty, Commander, Grand Cherokee, and Wrangler models</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/14/jeep-recalling-more-than-47-000-liberty-commander-grand-cherok/">Jeep recalling more than 47,000 Liberty, Commander, Grand Cherokee, and Wrangler models</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V118&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/14/jeep-recalling-more-than-47-000-liberty-commander-grand-cherok/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1515685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/14/jeep-recalling-more-than-47-000-liberty-commander-grand-cherok/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>commander</category><category>grand cherokee</category><category>GrandCherokee</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>jeep wrangler</category><category>JeepCommander</category><category>JeepGrandCherokee</category><category>JeepLiberty</category><category>JeepWrangler</category><category>liberty</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><category>suv</category><category>tsb</category><category>wrangler</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler offering even more incentives to close out July]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/chrysler-offering-even-more-incentives-to-close-out-july/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/chrysler-offering-even-more-incentives-to-close-out-july/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/chrysler-offering-even-more-incentives-to-close-out-july/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080725/ANA05/628259970/1078/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/2005-durango.jpg" /></a><br /><br />The automotive sales sector is in a major state of flux as consumers continue to run from SUVs and pickup trucks into smaller, more fuel efficient cars. One manufacturer hit especially hard by this transition is Chrysler, a company that recently <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/toyota-tops-big-company-cafe-ratings-for-2007-model-year-with-29/">posted the worst</a> fleet average fuel economy numbers of all major automakers in the U.S. due to its truck-heavy lineup. Still, the automaker has built up a large supply of Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep utility vehicles that they have got to get off dealer lots somehow. To ease consumers into the fuel-thirsy utes, Chrysler has introduced new incentives of zero-percent financing for 72 months on the 2008 Dodge Durango, Chrysler Aspen and Jeep Grand Cherokee and Commander. <br /> <br />While the lack of any financing charges will certainly impact the bottom line, it is nothing compared to the losses the automaker has been hit with over its past lease deals. In fact, truck and SUV residuals are so bad these days that Chrysler Financial has gone so far as to completely <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/chryslers-financial-arm-no-longer-offering-leases/">cut leasing out</a> of its available portfolio starting August 1. The financing deals announced today are scheduled to continue through Thursday, July 31.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20080725/ANA05/628259970/1078/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01">Automotive News</a> - sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/chrysler-offering-even-more-incentives-to-close-out-july/">Chrysler offering even more incentives to close out July</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20080725/ANA05/628259970/1078/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/chrysler-offering-even-more-incentives-to-close-out-july/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1267277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/chrysler-offering-even-more-incentives-to-close-out-july/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>chrysler aspen</category><category>chrysler financial</category><category>chrysler group</category><category>chrysler incentive</category><category>chrysler incentives</category><category>chrysler lease</category><category>chrysler llc</category><category>ChryslerAspen</category><category>ChryslerFinancial</category><category>ChryslerGroup</category><category>ChryslerIncentive</category><category>ChryslerIncentives</category><category>ChryslerLease</category><category>ChryslerLlc</category><category>dodge durango</category><category>DodgeDurango</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>JeepCommander</category><category>JeepGrandCherokee</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jeep Commander could meet its demise in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/14/jeep-commander-could-meet-its-demise-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/14/jeep-commander-could-meet-its-demise-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/14/jeep-commander-could-meet-its-demise-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&amp;refer=us&amp;sid=ac_.rO8dAugM"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/surrender_command.jpg" /></a><br /><br />According to Bloomberg, the demise of the Jeep Commander is but a year away. Anonymous sources inside Chrysler told the news service that with a 43-percent decline this year, which follows declines every year since its first full year on the market, the Commander is surrendering its command.<br /><br />The SUV's end was claimed to be due to gas prices, since a V8 Commander averages about 17 MPG. However, exorbitant (for America) gas prices haven't killed a number of other vehicles that don't even do that well, so that reasoning makes us wonder. What makes more sense is that in addition to the sales plunge, the Commander was stealing an unexpectedly high number of sales from the Grand Cherokee. In a cozy pool, every little bit of water counts.<br /><br />If it's true, we have to admit we're sorry the Commander is going away. Some people have taken its boxy simplicity for blah-what-boredom, but it was just the kind of Jeep we like: straightforward, capable, roomy (no, we never put seven people in it), and a solid driver. Obviously we don't speak for the masses, but Commander, you will be missed.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&amp;refer=us&amp;sid=ac_.rO8dAugM">Bloomberg</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/14/jeep-commander-could-meet-its-demise-in-2009/">Jeep Commander could meet its demise in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&amp;refer=us&amp;sid=ac_.rO8dAugM>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/14/jeep-commander-could-meet-its-demise-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1166776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/14/jeep-commander-could-meet-its-demise-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commander</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>JeepCommander</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Press: Chrysler to cut its SUV offerings in half]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/press-chrysler-to-cut-its-suv-offerings-in-half/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/press-chrysler-to-cut-its-suv-offerings-in-half/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/press-chrysler-to-cut-its-suv-offerings-in-half/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aQ6IJhpddRLo"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="top" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/jeep-compass-2.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
It's no secret that Chrysler has some overlapping models in its lineup. Case(s)-in-point: it's hard to make a rational argument that Jeep should be offering both the Compass and Patriot (not to mention Dodge selling the Patriot's platform sibling, the Caliber) or the Grand Cherokee <em>and</em> the Commander. The Chrysler Aspen and Dodge Durango barely pretend to be different vehicles and there's no reason to sell both the Jeep Liberty and Dodge Nitro when they're basically the same machine. This revelation is as <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aQ6IJhpddRLo">obvious</a> to Chrysler's new management as it is to us, and Chrysler President Jim Press, says as much. "We're going to stop overlapping, we're going to bring everything under one roof. By doing that we will have more products in the markets we are not covering."<br /><br />Also marked as redundant by Press are the Chrysler Town and Country and Dodge Caravan minivans, but as easy as it may be to pinpoint overlapping models, fixing that problem may prove more difficult. Dealers will need to begin offering the whole Chrysler line of vehicles if this strategy of "bringing everything under one roof" is to succeed. Expect to see drastic changes taking place in the next four to five years.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aQ6IJhpddRLo">Bloomberg</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/press-chrysler-to-cut-its-suv-offerings-in-half/">Press: Chrysler to cut its SUV offerings in half</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aQ6IJhpddRLo>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/press-chrysler-to-cut-its-suv-offerings-in-half/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1146619/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/press-chrysler-to-cut-its-suv-offerings-in-half/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>chrysler aspen</category><category>chrysler minivan</category><category>chrysler minivans</category><category>chrysler-aspen</category><category>chrysler-minivan</category><category>chrysler-minivans</category><category>ChryslerAspen</category><category>ChryslerMinivan</category><category>ChryslerMinivans</category><category>compass</category><category>compatriot</category><category>dodge durango</category><category>dodge-durango</category><category>DodgeDurango</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>jeep compass</category><category>jeep patriot</category><category>jeep-compass</category><category>jeep-patriot</category><category>JeepCommander</category><category>JeepCompass</category><category>JeepPatriot</category><category>minivan</category><category>patriot</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler recalls more than 68k 2007s]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/23/chrysler-recalls-more-than-68k-2007s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/23/chrysler-recalls-more-than-68k-2007s/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/23/chrysler-recalls-more-than-68k-2007s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/daimlerchrysler/" rel="tag">Daimler</a></p><img width="449" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="227" border="0" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/12/ch007_001se_450.jpg" /><br /><br />If you own a 2007 Chrysler, Dodge or Jeep listen up, because you're likely affected by Chrysler's latest recall. DaimlerChrysler is bringing home more than 68,000 vehicles to reprogram balky brake computers. <br /><br />The 11 affected models are 2007 versions of the Sebring, 300, Charger, Magnum, Caliber, Commander, Grand Cherokee, Liberty, Nitro and Compass. Whew. <br /><br />Chrysler says computers in the recalled vehicles' could fail, leading to a loss of antilock brakes, traction control and speedomter functions. We don't remember much from our drivers' ed class, but we're pretty sure brake failure is hardly ever a good thing. Thankfully DC says nobody's been hurt yet.<br /><br />Oh, and you Sebring drivers must have broken a mirror or something. While one team of crack DC mechanics gives your car a brain transplant, another team will be reteaching it to defrost your windshield. So take a book or something. That particular recall affects about 6,000 new Sebrings. <br /><br />[Source: Reuters]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/23/chrysler-recalls-more-than-68k-2007s/">Chrysler recalls more than 68k 2007s</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?view=CN&amp;storyID=2006-12-22T203458Z_01_N22327000_RTRIDST_0_CHRYSLER-RECALL-UPDATE-1.XML&amp;rpc=66&amp;type=qcna>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/23/chrysler-recalls-more-than-68k-2007s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/723846/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/23/chrysler-recalls-more-than-68k-2007s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>caliber</category><category>charger</category><category>Chrysler 300</category><category>Chrysler300</category><category>commaner</category><category>compass</category><category>Dodge Caliber</category><category>Dodge Charger</category><category>Dodge Magnum</category><category>DodgeCaliber</category><category>DodgeCharger</category><category>DodgeMagnum</category><category>grand cherokee</category><category>GrandCherokee</category><category>Jeep Commander</category><category>Jeep Grand Cherokee</category><category>Jeep Liberty</category><category>Jeep Nitro</category><category>JeepCommander</category><category>JeepGrandCherokee</category><category>JeepLiberty</category><category>JeepNitro</category><category>liberty</category><category>magnum</category><category>nitro</category><category>sebring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler cusses in never-aired gag ads]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/chrysler-cusses-in-never-aired-gag-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/chrysler-cusses-in-never-aired-gag-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/chrysler-cusses-in-never-aired-gag-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/maintenance/" rel="tag">Maintenance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><object width="425" height="350">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PX3V8CYcOtA" name="movie" />
<param value="transparent" name="wmode" /><embed width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PX3V8CYcOtA"></embed></object><br />WARNING: Video is NOT work or kid friendly. Contains adult language, and unlike <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/holy-safe-could-course-car-ads-attract-fcc-attention/">Binky</a>, it ain't bleeped.<br /><br />Our friends at Jalopnik discovered Chrysler's <a href="http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-chrysler-groups-looking-for-you-to-make-the-folgers-switch-216807.php">new online-only ad campaign</a> a few days ago. Now the Jalopnik team has unearthed what is supposedly Chrysler's ad agency, <a href="http://www.bbdo.com/">BBDO Detroit</a>, having a little fun with the Folgers coffee takeoff in the originals. We have to say, the originals are attention-getting and original (OK, an original takeoff on an old Folger's ad), but the edgier gag ads do more to stimulate our car-buying gland.<br /><br />One more gag ad joins the two original ads after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: Jalopnik]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/chrysler-cusses-in-never-aired-gag-ads/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler cusses in never-aired gag ads</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/chrysler-cusses-in-never-aired-gag-ads/">Chrysler cusses in never-aired gag ads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://jalopnik.com/cars/ad-watch/ad-watch-exclusive-chrysler-fires-one-past-the-censors-217007.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/chrysler-cusses-in-never-aired-gag-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/707399/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/chrysler-cusses-in-never-aired-gag-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>300c</category><category>chrysler 300c</category><category>chrysler ad</category><category>chrysler advertising</category><category>chrysler gag ad</category><category>chrysler gag ads</category><category>chrysler online ads</category><category>Chrysler300c</category><category>ChryslerAd</category><category>ChryslerAdvertising</category><category>ChryslerGagAd</category><category>ChryslerGagAds</category><category>ChryslerOnlineAds</category><category>daimlerchrysler</category><category>daimlerchrysler advertising</category><category>daimlerchrysler online advertising</category><category>DaimlerchryslerAdvertising</category><category>DaimlerchryslerOnlineAdvertising</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep ad</category><category>jeep advertising</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>jeep gag ad</category><category>jeep gag ads</category><category>jeep online ads</category><category>JeepAd</category><category>JeepAdvertising</category><category>JeepCommander</category><category>JeepGagAd</category><category>JeepGagAds</category><category>JeepOnlineAds</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAds</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vote for TTAC's Ten Worst Autos Today]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/29/vote-for-ttacs-worst-auto-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/29/vote-for-ttacs-worst-auto-today/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/29/vote-for-ttacs-worst-auto-today/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://www2.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2552"><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="242" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/jeepcmpass.jpg" id="img1" /></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www2.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2552">Voting is open</a> for The Truth About Cars' first ever Ten Worst Automobiles Today (or TWAT) award that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/17/ttac-launches-ten-worst-automobiles-today-award/">we told you about earlier in the month</a>. The initial list of more than <a href="http://www2.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2503">120 reader nominations</a> contained predictable TWAT-eligible autos like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_U_platform">GM's ancient minivans</a>, uh, sorry, Crossover Sport Van, a couple of <a href="http://www.saturn.com/">Saturns</a>, several <a href="http://www.chrysler.com/">DaimlerChryslers</a>, and a few <a href="http://kia.com/">Korean</a> models. Some vehicles that were nominated but didn't make the list included highly-respected vehicles like the Toyota Camry, Pontiac Solstice, Ford Focus and Honda Fit.<br /><br />Using a highly refined <a href="http://www2.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2507">proprietary system</a>, TTAC staffers trimmed the candidates to 20. Voting for the Ten Worst Automobiles Today is now open until Wednesday. See the 20 TWAT candidates after the jump.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/29/vote-for-ttacs-worst-auto-today/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vote for TTAC's Ten Worst Autos Today</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/29/vote-for-ttacs-worst-auto-today/">Vote for TTAC's Ten Worst Autos Today</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www2.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2552>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/29/vote-for-ttacs-worst-auto-today/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/692536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/29/vote-for-ttacs-worst-auto-today/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aspen</category><category>Aveo</category><category>Buick Rendezvous</category><category>BuickRendezvous</category><category>Cobalt</category><category>Crossfire</category><category>DaimlerChrysler</category><category>Escalade</category><category>Ford Ranger</category><category>FordRanger</category><category>Hummer</category><category>Hummer H2</category><category>HummerH2</category><category>Impala</category><category>Infiniti</category><category>Infiniti QX56</category><category>InfinitiQx56</category><category>Jaguar X-type</category><category>JaguarX-type</category><category>jeep</category><category>Jeep Commander</category><category>jeep compass</category><category>JeepCommander</category><category>JeepCompass</category><category>Lincoln Mark LT</category><category>Lincoln Navigator</category><category>LincolnMarkLt</category><category>LincolnNavigator</category><category>Mazda B-Series</category><category>MazdaB-series</category><category>Monte Carlo</category><category>MonteCarlo</category><category>Saab 9-7x</category><category>Saab9-7x</category><category>Subaru B9 Tribeca</category><category>Subaru Baja</category><category>subaru Tribeca</category><category>SubaruB9Tribeca</category><category>SubaruBaja</category><category>SubaruTribeca</category><category>Ten Worst Automobiles Today</category><category>TenWorstAutomobilesToday</category><category>The Truth About Cars</category><category>The Truth About Cars TWAT</category><category>TheTruthAboutCars</category><category>TheTruthAboutCarsTwat</category><category>TTAC</category><category>TWAT</category><category>Uplander</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rock 'em Sock 'em SUV: Jeep Commander passes crash test]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/rock-em-sock-em-suv-jeep-commander-passes-crash-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/rock-em-sock-em-suv-jeep-commander-passes-crash-test/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/rock-em-sock-em-suv-jeep-commander-passes-crash-test/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="378" border="1" align="right" alt=""src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/CommanderHill.jpg" />The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(NHTSA) has released results for its latest battery of crash tests involving the Jeep Commander. The NHTSA has awardedJeeps largest model with a five star frontal crash rating, its highest accolade. The SUV has yet to be slammed from theside and managed to obtain three stars for its rollover rating in 4WD guise. The IIHS has yet to test the Commander.<br/><br />[Source: The Chrysler Group]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/rock-em-sock-em-suv-jeep-commander-passes-crash-test/">Rock 'em Sock 'em SUV: Jeep Commander passes crash test</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/rock-em-sock-em-suv-jeep-commander-passes-crash-test/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/604415/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/31/rock-em-sock-em-suv-jeep-commander-passes-crash-test/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>five star</category><category>FiveStar</category><category>fronal crash test</category><category>FronalCrashTest</category><category>Jeep Commander</category><category>JeepCommander</category><category>NHTSA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>