<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power says drivers increasingly frustrated by low-rolling resistance and run-flat tires]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/#continued"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/michelin-run-flat-tire.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Unless we're talking about tires used for specific conditions (snow, summer, off-road, etc.), we imagine most new car buyers don't think twice about the rubber on their ride. J.D. Power and Associates does, and it recently rated consumer satisfaction for the top tire brands in various vehicle segments, and it found that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/michelin/">Michelin</a> was consistently at or among the top-satisfying tire brands. As a part of this study, it also found some interesting data regarding two growing types of tires: run-flat and low-rolling resistance.<br />
<br />
Both of these tire types are used in different ways in an attempt to improve the fuel economy of modern vehicles, but there are also some draw backs involved. Run-flat tires help automakers shave precious pounds from a car's curb weight by removing the spare tire, but on average, J.D. Power says owners replace these tires twice as often as regular tires. The problem with low-rolling resistance tires might have to do more with marketing than anything else, as the study suggests that most consumers just don't understand how these tires benefit them and what compromises must be made.<br />
<br />
The study didn't mention price, but generally speaking, run-flat and low-rolling resistance tires also cost more to replace than standard tires - even worse, run-flats often need to be replaced in pairs, according to the study (note: we recommend changing all four tires whenever possible, run-flat or no). <a href="/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/#continued">Scroll down</a> to read more about the study including the various scores each tire manufacturer received.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power says drivers increasingly frustrated by low-rolling resistance and run-flat tires</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/">J.D. Power says drivers increasingly frustrated by low-rolling resistance and run-flat tires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20523281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer satisfaction</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power and associates</category><category>low rolling resistance tire</category><category>run-flat tires</category><category>tire study</category><category>tires</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20523281/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/01/j-d-power-says-drivers-increasingly-frustrated-by-low-rolling-r/20523281/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20523281</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/michelin-run-flat-tire_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Satisfaction with dealer service rises, Lexus and GMC are tops]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a></p><a href="/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/#continued"><img height="418" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/lexus-jd-power-consumer-service-satisfaction-01.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
During the economic downturn, many car dealerships counteracted their slowing income by focusing on things that would set them apart from competition - things like the quality of customer service they provide. When the economy picked up and more sales and service followed, many also first invested those funds back into the business, improving their dealership facilities and service centers.<br />
<br />
It looks like those investments are paying off, as <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd+power/">J.D. Power and Associates</a>' latest Customer Service Index Study shows that overall consumer satisfaction with dealer service has increased to 797 (on a 1,000-point scale), up from 787 in 2012 and 29 points higher than the score in 2011. The study also finds that people are more satisfied with the service they get at dealerships compared to independent service providers, despite the much higher average out-of-pocket cost per visit ($118 vs. $44).<br />
<br />
Note, however, that this study only looks at how people are treated by a dealer's service department during the first three years of ownership (the survey is based on responses from 91,000 owners and lessees of 2008 to 2012 model year vehicles), so we're talking about the experience had when bringing a car in for repair or maintenance work, most likely under warranty. In fact, maintenance work is increasing in share and accounted for 77 percent of service visits (up from 72 percent in 2012 and 63 percent in 2011). This helps explain why customer satisfaction has also risen, since a properly maintained car is one that's less likely to require a dealer visit for an unexpected repair.<br />
<br />
Of the automakers, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> again ranks highest in customer satisfaction for dealer service for the fifth consecutive year with a CSI score of 862. What might surprise you is that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/">GMC</a> is the highest-scoring mass market brand, with a CSI score of 819. <a href="/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/#continued">Scroll below</a> to see the rest of the rankings and pour over more data from the study.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Satisfaction with dealer service rises, Lexus and GMC are tops</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/">Satisfaction with dealer service rises, Lexus and GMC are tops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20502634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car repairs</category><category>car service</category><category>csi</category><category>customer service</category><category>customer service index</category><category>gmc</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power and associates</category><category>lexus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:44:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20502634/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/03/14/satisfaction-with-dealer-service-rises-lexus-and-gmc-are-tops/20502634/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20502634</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/lexus-jd-power-consumer-service-satisfaction-01_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power: Vehicle dependability at all-time high, Lexus and Porsche lead]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><p>
	<a href="/2013/02/13/jd-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-pors/#continued"><img alt="J.D. Power and Associates 2013 Vehicle Dependability bar chart" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/jdpower-vds-2013-1360788189.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
	<br />
	Each year, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd+power/">J.D. Power and Associates</a> surveys original owners of three-year-old vehicles to find out what kinds of problems they have had experienced over the last 12 months, and then it uses this data to create its annual <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/vehicle+dependability+study/">Vehicle Dependability Study</a>. This means that the models in the 2013 study are 2010 model year vehicles, and J.D. Power rates each make as well as the top individual models based on how many problems were experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100).</p>
<p>
	Debunking the idea that carryover models are more dependable than new or updated models, the 2013 study found that the average carryover model experienced 133 PP100, while all-new or redesigned vehicles for the 2010 model year had 116 PP100; vehicles that received minor changes fared the best with just 111 PP100. The overall average for all makes was 126 PP100, which is the lowest figure since the findings were first issued in 1989.<br />
	<br />
	For 2013, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/">Porsche</a> remained in the top two spots, respectively (and each experienced fewer problems year over year), but there were plenty of shakeups elsewhere in the list. The biggest mover overall was <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram/">Ram</a>, which moved up 20 spots from one of the worst performers in 2012 to sitting pretty in the top 10. Other big positive movers include <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/">Mazda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/">Infiniti</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>. On the opposite side of things, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/">Scion</a> dropped 13 spots, falling from the fifth-best score down to No. 18. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volvo/">Volvo</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/">Mitsubishi</a> were other makes that saw big drops in their dependability results.<br />
	<br />
	In terms of dependability for individual models, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> products grabbed the top spot in seven of 18 vehicle segments and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/gm/">General Motors</a> also performed well among its individual makes, being named most dependable in four categories. The total breakdown as well as the official press release are posted <a href="/2013/02/13/jd-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-pors/#continued">below</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power: Vehicle dependability at all-time high, Lexus and Porsche lead</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/">J.D. Power: Vehicle dependability at all-time high, Lexus and Porsche lead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20460608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 vehicle dependability study</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power and associa...</category><category>jd power and associates</category><category>lexus</category><category>most reliable new cars</category><category>porsche</category><category>relability</category><category>toyota</category><category>vehicle dependability</category><category>vehicle dependability study</category><category>vehicle reliability</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20460608/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/13/j-d-power-vehicle-dependability-at-all-time-high-lexus-and-po/20460608/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20460608</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/jdpower-vds-2013-1360788189_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power: Mini, Lexus again offer most satisfying sales experience]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><img height="432"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/mini-dealership.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd power/">JD Power</a> has released its annual Sales Satisfaction Index Study, and once again <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini/">Mini</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> have taken top honors. Overall, buyers are more satisfied with the auto-buying sales experience than they were last year, with those surveyed reporting an average score of 664 points on a 1,000-point scale. That's up from 648 in 2011. Dealer satisfaction also increased by five points over last year as well.<br />
<br />
All told, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> brought home an index score of 737, which was high enough to put it atop the luxury brands for the second year in a row. JD Power says <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/">Infiniti</a> came in second in that category with a score of 728 and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> rounded out the podium with it's rating of 725. Speaking of Infiniti, that brand saw the single largest jump in sales satisfaction of any brand on the survey, popping up 52 index points over 2011.<br />
<br />
Among mass-market brands, Mini ranked highest with a score of 712, followed closely by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/">Buick</a> with 706 and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/">GMC</a> farther down the line with 683. You can check out the <a href="/2012/11/28/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/#continued">full press release below</a> for more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power: Mini, Lexus again offer most satisfying sales experience</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/">J.D. Power: Mini, Lexus again offer most satisfying sales experience</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20390871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buick</category><category>cadillac</category><category>gmc</category><category>infiniti</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power sales satisfaction</category><category>lexus</category><category>mini</category><category>sales satisfaction</category><category>study</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20390871/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/29/j-d-power-mini-lexus-again-offer-most-satisfying-sales-experi/20390871/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20390871</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/mini-dealership_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Never mind the problems, car buyers still happier with hands-free tech]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infotainment/" rel="tag">Infotainment</a></p><img alt="JD Power" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/jdpower-250.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 250px; height: 329px; float: right;" />You've seen the opening to <em>Annie Hall</em>, right? Where Woody Allen tells the classic joke about two women grumbling about their dinner? The one complains that the food is terrible, while the other, agreeing, says the portions are too small. That's the automotive infotainment business in a nutshell.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd+power/">JD Power</a> spells this out in a new analysis of its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/">2012 APEAL survey</a>. To put it simply, having some infotainment system is better than none, even if the technology occasionally makes you want to push your car into a deep lake.<br />
<br />
Power says infotainment, which it calls "audio/entertainment/navigation (AEN) systems" and includes hands-free technology, had the highest average problem count in its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/">2012 Initial Quality Study</a>. But those owners who had systems of this sort that included hands-free communication were some 12-percent more likely to recommend their vehicles to others. These owners were also "slightly more likely" to repurchase the same vehicle brand, according to Power.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/08/03/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/#continued">Scroll down</a> to watch the aforementioned clip from the 1978 Academy Award Winner for Best Picture.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Never mind the problems, car buyers still happier with hands-free tech</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/">Never mind the problems, car buyers still happier with hands-free tech</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20292909/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>annie hall</category><category>apeal</category><category>apeal study</category><category>infotainment</category><category>Initial Quality Study</category><category>iqs</category><category>jd power</category><category>woody allen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20292909/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/08/04/never-mind-the-problems-car-buyers-still-happier-with-hands-fre/20292909/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20292909</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/jdpower-250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chevy earns most nods in 2012 J.D. Power APEAL study... sort of]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-chevrolet-sonic-ltz-review/"><img alt="2012 Chevrolet Sonic" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/2012-chevrolet-sonic-ltz-review-opt.jpeg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
On first glance, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/gm/">General Motors</a> seems to have a lot to crow about in the latest <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd+power/">JD Power</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/apeal/">APEAL</a> rankings. After all, its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> brand claimed three segment awards - the most of any single brand - and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> finished tied for eighth place overall in the 2012 edition of the study. But upon closer inspection, the results may not be quite so rosy for The General.<br />
<br />
The APEAL study ranks new vehicles for how "gratifying" they are, based on owner evaluations of some 80 attributes. Yes, this is something of an automotive popularity contest. And the problem for GM is that, overall, its customers just don't like its products as much as those who buy from other carmakers.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/">Buick</a>, Chevrolet and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/">GMC</a> all scored below the industry average in the 2012 APEAL study. Despite Cadillac's top ten ranking, the only luxury brands it managed to beat were <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/">Lincoln</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volvo/">Volvo</a>, luxury bottom-feeders all. To be fair, we should note that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> also failed to finish above the industry average, though both <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> did, but barely.<br />
<br />
The Chevrolet vehicles that claimed segment awards sent something of a mixed message. While the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/sonic/">Sonic</a> finishing first among subcompacts has to be seen as a huge win for GM, the other segment awards went to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/volt/">Volt</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/avalanche/">Avalanche</a>, in the compact and large pickup categories, respectively. The Volt is a great car, but it isn't a volume product and the Avalanche is a dead truck walking, slated to go out of production after the 2013 model year. The only other GM vehicle to make the top three in any segment was the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/escalade/">Cadillac Escalade</a> in the mostly moribund Large Premium Crossover/SUV. Nary a Buick or GMC is to be found on the list in any position.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, down I-94 in Dearborn, Ford has six vehicles in the top three in their respective segments, including winners in Large Crossover/SUV (<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/expedition/">Expedition</a>) and Midsize Crossover/SUV (<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/flex/">Flex</a>). Even Chrysler managed to snag two segment awards (<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/challenger/">Dodge Challenger</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/charger/">Charger</a>) and land three other vehicles in the top three in their segments.<br />
<br />
If we really wanted to crown an APEAL winner, that title might just go to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/">Audi</a>, whose <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/a8/">A8</a> had the highest score of any model and also won a segment award for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/a6/">A6</a>, while placing third overall. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/">Porsche</a>, however, could rightly lay the best claim to the 2012 APEAL championship, considering it had the highest brand score and won two segments, for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/911/">911</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/cayenne/">Cayenne</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/#continued">Scroll down</a> to read the full press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chevy earns most nods in 2012 J.D. Power APEAL study... sort of</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/">Chevy earns most nods in 2012 J.D. Power APEAL study... sort of</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20285889/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apeal</category><category>audi</category><category>chrysler</category><category>ford</category><category>gm</category><category>jd power</category><category>porsche</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20285889/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/07/25/chevy-earns-most-nods-in-2012-j-d-power-apeal-study-sort-of/20285889/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20285889</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/2012-chevrolet-sonic-ltz-review-opt_thumbnail.jpeg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[What's the right way to read an automotive quality report?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><em><big>Why No One Quality Report Tells The Whole Story</big></em><br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/#continued"><img alt="Auto mechanic turning a wrench under a vehicle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/06/auto-mechanic.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 418px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="pull-quote pull-quote-right">
	<p>
		Quality remains one of the most significant factors for folks buying a new car.</p>
</blockquote>
There's no question that fuel economy has become a critical consideration for most folks looking to buy a new car. But quality remains one of the single most significant factors in closing the deal.<br />
<br />
Once upon a time, word of mouth was the only way to differentiate between one brand and another, an important yet oftentimes unreliable approach. Then, back in the 1970s, a one-time <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> analyst by the name of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/">J. David Power</a> revolutionized the industry with his first quantitative studies of vehicle quality and reliability. Today, <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/j.d. power">J.D. Power and Associates</a> is the quality field heavyweight, with all sorts of wannabes chasing for a piece of its multi-million-dollar consulting business.<br />
<br />
Earlier this month, Power released its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/">26th annual Initial Quality Study</a>, perhaps the single-most widely quoted survey of its kind, which tallies up the results of a lengthy questionnaire filled out by tens of thousands of recent vehicle buyers. To understand the significance of the IQS, consider that Ford <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/ford-tempers-expectations-of-improvement-in-j-d-power-quality-s/">held a separate news conference a day earlier</a> to address the likelihood of its downward slide in the survey. Makers who did well blitzed the media with news releases trumpeting their performance.<br />
<br />
<hr style="width: 628px !important;" />
<div style="text-align: right;">
	<em><img alt="Paul Eisenstein" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/eisenstein-driving-thumb.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 0px 6px; float: right;" /></em><em>Paul A. Eisenstein is Publisher of </em><a href="http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/"><em>TheDetroitBureau.com</em></a><em> and a 30-year veteran of the automotive beat. His editorials bring his unique perspective and deep understanding of the auto world to Autoblog readers on a regular basis.</em></div>
<br />
<hr style="width: 628px !important;" /><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What's the right way to read an automotive quality report?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/">What's the right way to read an automotive quality report?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20269019/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eisenstein</category><category>eisenstein on autoblog</category><category>Initial Quality Study</category><category>iqs</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jd power</category><category>paul eisenstein</category><category>quality</category><category>thedetroitbureau.com</category><category>vds</category><category>vehicle dependability study</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Eisenstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20269019/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/06/29/whats-the-right-way-to-read-an-automotive-quality-report/20269019/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20269019</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/06/auto-mechanic_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power Initial Quality Study highlights infotainment woes, puts Lexus on top]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infotainment/" rel="tag">Infotainment</a></p><a href="/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/#continued"><img alt="J.D. Power Initial Quality Study 2012"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/06/jd-power-iqs-2012.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Despite an overall increase in overall quality of five percent, automakers are continuing to struggle with in-car technologies, says J.D. Power in its annual Initial Quality Study. Owners reports of problems with factory-installed hands-free communication devices has increased 137 percent since 2009, when such infotainment solutions were offered mostly in high-end models only.<br />
<br />
But first, some good statistics: 26 out of 34 brands represented in the study posted improvements this year over their 2011 scores, with 65 percent of the 185 individual models boasting higher scores than last year. Even brand-new nameplates are performing well in 2012 - 11 all-new or redesigned models scored better than average, equaling a 12-percent improvement from 2011.<br />
<br />
Coming in first place for 2012 is <a href="http://autoblog.com/lexus">Lexus</a>, the second year in a row Toyota's luxury brand has taken top honors. Second place is shared by <a href="http://autoblog.com/jaguar">Jaguar</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/porsche">Porsche</a>, with the former leaping an impressive 18 positions over its 2011 score. Fourth and fifth are grabbed by <a href="http://autoblog.com/cadillac">Cadillac</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/honda">Honda</a>, respectively. Fourteen different brands earned accolades for individual models, "A positive indication of how widespread high quality is among automakers," says David Sargent, vice president of global automotive at J.D. Power and Associates.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>, which was hit hard in 2011 due to problems with its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/myford+touch/">MyFord Touch</a> and MyLincoln Touch systems, came in at a lowly 28 out of 35. Bennie Fowler, Ford's group vice president of global quality, had said <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/ford-tempers-expectations-of-improvement-in-j-d-power-quality-s/">the automaker expected</a> to "be about the same or slightly better" than last year's 23rd. Not quite... but it could be worse: Last place is shared by <a href="http://autoblog.com/fiat">Fiat</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/smart">Smart</a>.<br />
<br />
Continuing with the frequently heard technology gripes, Sargent says, "Automakers and suppliers are working hard to ... make the driving experience safer, more convenient and more entertaining. However, the most innovative technology in the world will quickly create dissatisfaction if owners can't get it to work."<br />
<br />
We would add, though, that this study polls users after just 90 days with a new car. We wonder if the scores might improve once owners get more familiar with their in-car technology. In any case, feel free to peruse the press blast <a href="/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/#continued">below</a>, which includes graphs comparing each individual automaker.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power Initial Quality Study highlights infotainment woes, puts Lexus on top</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/">J.D. Power Initial Quality Study highlights infotainment woes, puts Lexus on top</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20262684/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>Initial Quality Study</category><category>iqs</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>J.D. Power and Associates</category><category>j.d. power initial quality</category><category>jd power</category><category>lexus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20262684/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/06/20/j-d-power-initial-quality-study-highlights-infotainment-woes-p/20262684/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20262684</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/06/jd-power-iqs-2012_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Who, exactly, is J.D. Power?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://wardsauto.com/sales-amp-marketing/jd-power-man-behind-famous-awards"><img alt="James David Power III - headshot" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/james-david-power-iii-headshot.jpg" style="margin: 4px; float: right; width: 250px; height: 263px;" /><b> </b></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd power">J.D. Power</a> has become a household name thanks to the organization's yearly awards based on in-depth consumer surveys about all manner of goods and services. In the automotive industry, manufacturers constantly struggle to best each other for top honors, and that struggle has helped push the industry toward ever-better quality. But as <em>Ward's Auto</em> points out, few people know the man behind the name.<br />
<br />
James David Power III began licensing manufacturers to use his award in advertisements in 1986, two years after <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru\">Subaru</a> dropped the J.D. Power name in a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/super bowl">Super Bowl</a> ad.<br />
<br />
In 2005, Power sold J.D. Power and Associates to publishing giant McGraw-Hill, but stayed on with the company until 2009. Even after his departure, <em>Ward's Auto</em> says Power is proud of the empire he helped build. While outlets like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer reports"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> have gained a substantial following, the organization only polls its own subscribers, while J.D. Power takes its data from a larger cross section of consumers.<br />
<br />
Using a separate operation to keep conflicts of interest at bay, companies must pay a fee to be able to use the J.D. Power name in their ads. Yet J.D. Power is not without controversy - auto companies pay substantial fees for access to its various quality metrics and counsel, leading critics to suggest there's a conflict of interest in having a quality auditor paid by the very companies it monitors. In addition, critics note that the company's much ballyhooed Initial Quality Study <a href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/the-trouble-with-jd-powers-initial-quality-study-feature">isn't purely a study of manufacturing defects</a>, but rather an arcane formula that mixes actual owner problems with design flaws (think: cupholders that can't hold a Venti Frappucino from Starbucks). As most consumers are likely to equate the idea of quality with a product free of problems, the thought is that this is somewhat misleading methodology.<br />
<br />
Either way, there's no doubting J.D. Power's impact on the auto biz - both the company and the man who bears its name. To learn more about him, check out the in-depth <em>Ward's Auto</em> article at the link below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/">Who, exactly, is J.D. Power?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20202704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>initial quality survey</category><category>iqs</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>j.d. power iqs</category><category>james daniel powers iii</category><category>jd power</category><category>mcgraw hill</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20202704/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/04/06/who-exactly-is-j-d-power/20202704/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20202704</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/james-david-power-iii-headshot_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lexus, Mini take home dealer satisfaction laurels in latest J.D. Power survey]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-lexus-gs-350-first-drive/"><img alt="2013 Lexus GS" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/2013-lexus-gs-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
When it comes to handing out awards, nobody works harder than <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd+power/">J.D. Power</a>. With surveys concocted to measure <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/">dependability</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/">brand reputation</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/">customer retention</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/">quality</a>, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/">whatever else the company can dream up</a>, we sometimes wonder whether the company's plaudits aren't becoming a little like "participant" medals awarded at the end of kids' sports seasons.<br />
<br />
This latest J.D. Power survey, the 2012 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/17/lexus-mini-top-j-d-power-customer-service-survey/">Customer Service Index</a>, measures service satisfaction at dealerships. The most interesting find is that overall satisfaction at dealers is nearly four percent greater than at independent repair facilities. Visits to dealers among owners of vehicles less than three years old are up as well.<br />
<br />
Of course, the numbers that people will be most interested in relate to how each brand fared in the survey. J.D. Power ranks each marque on a 1,000-point scale, "based on dealer service performance during the first three years of new-vehicle ownership, which typically represents the majority of the vehicle warranty period. Five measures are examined to determine overall customer satisfaction with dealer service (listed in order of importance): service quality; service initiation; service advisor; service facility; and vehicle pick-up."<br />
<br />
The brands are broken into either luxury or mainstream categories, and the top performers in each list are clustered fairly close together. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> scored 861 points, followed by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> (852) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jaguar/">Jaguar</a> (849) on the luxury side. The mass market competitors finished even closer, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini/">Mini</a> leading at 809 points, followed closely by three <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/gm/">General Motors</a> brands: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/">Buick</a> (805), <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/">GMC</a> (803) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> (801).<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/#continued">See below</a> for the full press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lexus, Mini take home dealer satisfaction laurels in latest J.D. Power survey</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/">Lexus, Mini take home dealer satisfaction laurels in latest J.D. Power survey</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20193258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buick</category><category>cadillac</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>csi</category><category>customer service</category><category>customer service index</category><category>dealer satisfaction</category><category>dealers</category><category>gmc</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jaguar</category><category>jd power</category><category>lexus</category><category>mini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20193258/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/14/lexus-mini-take-home-dealer-satisfaction-laurels-in-latest-j-d/20193258/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20193258</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/2013-lexus-gs-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power reports vehicle dependability has substantially improved]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/" rel="tag">Scion</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="/2012/02/15/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/#continued"><img alt="2010 Lexus LS460 Sport" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/2010-lexus-ls460-sport-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 419px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Remember the days of planned obsolescence? They're over. The latest <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd+power/">J.D. Power</a> Vehicle Dependability Study shows a 13-percent improvement in new car dependability over the first three years of ownership. The latest sample of 2009 model year vehicles shows the lowest rate of problems since the study's inception in 1990.<br />
<br />
The big winner was the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/ls/">Lexus LS</a>, which had the fewest reported problems in the study. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> was the highest rated brand as well, followed by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/">Scion</a>. J.D. Power says 25 of 32 automotive brands showed improved dependability, with six declining and one remaining the same.<br />
<br />
While J.D. Power was pleased to see automakers producing high quality cars despite the economic disaster unfolding around them three years ago, it did note that some brands are still not getting credit for building reliable vehicles. "During the past four years, models from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/">Buick</a>, Cadillac, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/">Lincoln</a> have achieved consistently strong levels of dependability," the company's release stated, "but still have relatively high proportions of new-vehicle buyers expressing reliability concerns."<br />
<br />
To read the full press release, click <a href="/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/#continued">past the jump</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power reports vehicle dependability has substantially improved</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/">J.D. Power reports vehicle dependability has substantially improved</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20172680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadillac</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>j.d. power vehicle dependability study</category><category>jd power</category><category>JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study</category><category>lexus</category><category>porsche</category><category>quality</category><category>scion</category><category>toyota</category><category>vehicle dependability</category><category>vehicle dependability study</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20172680/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/02/16/jd-power-reports-vehicle-dependability-has-substantially-improve/20172680/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20172680</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/2010-lexus-ls460-sport-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power: More car buyers base purchases on brand reputation than ratings and reviews]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a></p><a href="/2012/01/26/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/#continued"><img alt="Yugo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/yugo-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 471px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Reputation is everything, according to a new survey by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd+power/">J.D. Power and Associates</a>. The 2012 Avoider Study found that 43 percent of buyers who steer clear of a particular model due to quality concerns do so merely because of common knowledge. Ratings and reviews - <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/reviews/">our stock in trade</a> - were cited by 38 percent, while previous ownership of a model caused scorn in only 14 percent of respondents.<br />
<br />
"The fact that so many new-vehicle buyers may be basing their opinions about quality and reliability on pre-conceived [sic] notions, rather than concrete information or data, demonstrates how important it is for automakers to promote the quality and reliability of their models," said Jon Osborn, research director at J.D. Power and Associates, in what reads like a nakedly self-serving press release.<br />
<br />
Other interesting data from the survey included an all-time high for xenophobia, with respondents who avoided import models because of their origin rising to 14 percent, the highest in the nine years of the study. Buyers avoiding domestics for the same reason dropped to six percent, the lowest in the study's history.<br />
<br />
The most influential reason for purchasing a specific model in 2012 was fuel economy, trumping reliability, "the deal," and exterior styling, which were tops in 2010.<br />
<br />
To read the entire press release, click <a href="/2012/01/26/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/#continued">past the jump</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power: More car buyers base purchases on brand reputation than ratings and reviews</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/">J.D. Power: More car buyers base purchases on brand reputation than ratings and reviews</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20157884/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012 avoider study</category><category>avoider study</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>j.d. power and associates</category><category>jd power</category><category>quality</category><category>quality reputation</category><category>reputation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20157884/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/01/27/j-d-power-more-car-buyers-base-purchases-on-brand-reputation-t/20157884/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20157884</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/yugo-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai tops J.D. Power's Customer Retention Study]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><img alt="Hyundai Emblem" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/hyundai-emblem-628.jpg" style="margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 417px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jd power">J.D. Power and Associates</a> has released its annual Customer Retention Study, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai">Hyundai</a> ranks the highest among brands in retaining buyers. Hyundai's retention rate is up four percentage points to 64 percent in 2012, thanks largely to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/elantra">Elantra</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/sonata">Sonata</a> models. J.D. Power says that much of the manufacturer's retention rate can be traced to its growing vehicle offerings and positively changing perceptions about Hyundai quality and market appeal.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda">Honda</a> tied for second place with a rate of 60 percent. The report notes that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep">Jeep</a> enjoyed the largest improvement over the previous year with a jump of 17 percentage points to 51 percent in 2012.<br />
<br />
The study also evaluated which buyers were more likely to return to an automaker for their next purchase, and the data revealed women and younger buyers had a higher brand retention rate than older consumers and males. Honda, Hyundai, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia">Kia</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz">Mercedes-Benz</a> were all found to be particularly adept at keeping their female customers, while Ford, Kia, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus">Lexus</a> and Mercedes-Benz did a better job of holding onto buyers from Gen X and Y. <a href="/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/#continued">Hit the jump</a> for the full results of the 2012 Customer Retention Study.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyundai tops J.D. Power's Customer Retention Study</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/">Hyundai tops J.D. Power's Customer Retention Study</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20148407/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>customer retention study</category><category>elantra</category><category>ford</category><category>honda</category><category>hyundai</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power and associates</category><category>jd power and associates customer retention study</category><category>sonata</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20148407/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/01/15/hyundai-tops-j-d-powers-customer-retention-study/20148407/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20148407</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/hyundai-emblem-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Car and Driver</i> calls out J.D. Power IQS]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/design-style/" rel="tag">Design/Style</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-ford-explorer-ecoboost-first-drive/#photo-4401726/"><img alt="2012 Ford Explorer" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/2012-ford-explorer-ecoboost-fd-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> has <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/">taken it on the chin from J.D. Power</a> since the carmaker rolled out its new MyFord Touch system in the 2011 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/explorer/">Explorer</a>. Ford's ranking in the influential Initial Quality Survey dropped from fifth last year all the way down to 23rd, in large measure because of customer dissatisfaction with the new technology and its voice recognition interface, but also because of refinement complaints about the PowerShift dual-clutch transmission in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fiesta/">Fiesta</a>. But unlike, say, the Houston Cougars, who plummeted in the Bowl Championship Series rankings after getting blown out in the Conference USA title game this weekend, Ford can make a pretty good case that it's getting jobbed.<br />
<br />
The traditional definition of quality when it comes to new cars and trucks has been based on those vehicles being free of defects. But in the last few years, the tide has been turning, in large measure because J.D. Power is increasingly weighing customer complaints related to design and, in particular, new electronic technology. <em>Car and Driver</em> paints the complaints that have dogged Ford among the latter, suggesting that these are less valid quality metrics than something like a poorly assembled door panel.<br />
<br />
The venerable buff book doesn't stop at defending Ford, however, cautioning against what it sees as a trend "toward the lowest-common-denominator solutions to reduce design 'problems.'" Citing examples like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/">BMW</a> moving its cruise control from a separate stalk to buttons on the steering wheel to appease whining customers and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/">Porsche</a> getting dinged on IQS for using brake pads that generate too much dust, C/D doesn't say it outright, but certainly implies that J.D. Power is no longer pushing automakers in the right direction.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/"><i>Car and Driver</i> calls out J.D. Power IQS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20120747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apeal</category><category>apeal study</category><category>car and driver</category><category>explorer</category><category>fiesta</category><category>ford</category><category>initial quality study</category><category>iqs</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jd power</category><category>myford touch</category><category>mylincoln touch</category><category>powershift</category><category>quality</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20120747/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/20120747/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20120747</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/2012-ford-explorer-ecoboost-fd-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Surprise! J.D. Power reports consumers frustrated with navigation systems]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infotainment/" rel="tag">Infotainment</a></p><a href="/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/#continued"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/jaguar-xj48-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 437px;" /></a><br />
<br />
For those of us testing dozens of in-car navigation and infotainment systems each year, J.D. Power's 2011 U.S. Navigation Usage and Satisfaction Study comes as no surprise.<br />
<br />
According to owners surveyed in the study, simplicity and ease-of-use are lacking in the majority of systems on the market, with "Address/street/city not found" topping the list, followed by difficulty inputting a destination, poor routing, ineffectual voice controls, a lack of street names and missing points of interest. Not to mention the most obvious issue: the inability to find the proper function in the menu system.<br />
<br />
Additionally, with a growing number of automakers combining climate controls into the touchscreen, these systems are adding another layer of complexity with few tangible benefits.<br />
<br />
Interestingly though, the Garmin-supplied system fitted to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/charger/">Dodge Charger</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/300/">Chrysler 300</a> - placing first and third, respectively, in consumer satisfaction - do combine many of the vehicle's climate control functions in a separate menu on the screen. So the issue isn't about incorporation, it's about execution.<br />
<br />
Lining the bottom of the pack were a few <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a> models (no surprise considering how long in the tooth COMAND is), the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jaguar/xj/">Jaguar XJ</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volvo/xc90/">Volvo XC90</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mkx/">Lincoln MKX</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/rav4/">Toyota RAV4</a>. And while the Clarion-equipped system (in the process of being phased out) in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/flex/">Ford Flex</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion/">Fusion</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mks/">Lincoln MKS</a> all made it into the top 10, the TeleNav versions of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/explorer/">Ford Explorer</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/edge/">Edge</a> - yes, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/MyFordTouch/">MyFord Touch</a> equipped models - landed near the bottom. However, many of those issues should be rectified <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/07/myford-touch-update/">with the 2013 update</a>, which includes faster response, better voice recognition and a mild UI overhaul. <a href="/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/#continued">Hit the jump</a> for the details and the complete rankings list.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Surprise! J.D. Power reports consumers frustrated with navigation systems</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/">Surprise! J.D. Power reports consumers frustrated with navigation systems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20112672/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gps</category><category>infotainment</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jd power</category><category>navigation</category><category>sat nav</category><category>satellite navigation</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20112672/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/20112672/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20112672</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/jaguar-xj48-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan rushes to grapple with poor quality survey scores]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/10/nissan-rushes-to-grapple-with-poor-quality-survey-scores/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/10/nissan-rushes-to-grapple-with-poor-quality-survey-scores/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/10/nissan-rushes-to-grapple-with-poor-quality-survey-scores/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/" rel="tag">Infiniti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20111010/OEM01/310109957/1117"><img alt="Nissan Juke plant"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/nissan-juke-assembly.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 446px; " /></a><br />
<br />
While <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> has never enjoyed the same stellar reputation for quality as its Japanese compatriots at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a>, it has lately found itself in danger of acquiring the opposite rep. Nissan's performance on influential J.D. Power quality and dependability studies has been below average lately, as many of its rivals have improved. Nissan will be launching a new quality plan in November, but<em> Automotive News</em> has the scoop today.<br />
<br />
The most immediate change in Nissan's quality approach is a shoot-the-messenger measure requiring dealers to present car buyers with a two-page quick-reference guide that's part of 2012 owner manuals. The manual insert will seek to address some of the common threads that have cropped up in J.D. Power survey results. Nissan will also be addressing some of the most frequent customer complaints, like poor shift quality from its new seven-speed automatic transmissions used in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/">Infiniti</a> products. Nissan tells AN that it is already upgrading the software in the transmissions.<br />
<br />
While that's a start, Nissan has a long way to go to hit its stated goal of having both Nissan and Infiniti brands in J.D. Power's top three in their respective categories by 2016. Nissan ranked just 24th in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/">Initial Quality Survey released in June</a>, and managed only 25th in the Vehicle Dependability Survey, according to AN.<br />
<br />
Other issues that have bothered Nissan customers include difficulties with HVAC controls, confusing rear wiper controls, and using hands-free phone systems. Kazumasa Katoh, Senior Vice President of Global Quality, said that these kinds of customer complaints are the result of Nissan customers' embrace of new technology, which can be complicated.<br />
<br />
We've heard this line rather often, ever since <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a> saw its J.D. Power scores plummet almost a decade ago. Yet automakers seem to continue to struggle in designing in-car systems that are simple and intuitive. Earlier this year, Ford's MyFord Touch system led <em>Consumer Reports</em> to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/04/consumer-reports-pulls-recommended-rating-on-ford-edge/">pull its coveted Recommended rating</a> from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/edge/">2011 Ford Edge</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mkx/">Lincoln MKX</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/10/nissan-rushes-to-grapple-with-poor-quality-survey-scores/">Nissan rushes to grapple with poor quality survey scores</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/10/nissan-rushes-to-grapple-with-poor-quality-survey-scores/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20077832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/10/nissan-rushes-to-grapple-with-poor-quality-survey-scores/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>infiniti</category><category>infiniti quality</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jd power</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan quality</category><category>quality</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20077832/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/10/10/nissan-rushes-to-grapple-with-poor-quality-survey-scores/20077832/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20077832</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/nissan-juke-assembly_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Volvo spot hopes to embarass German automakers on their own turf]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a></p><a href="/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/#continued"><img alt="Volvo thanks Germany"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/09/volvo-thanks-germany.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volvo/">Volvo</a> would like to take a moment to give a shout out to German drivers and German automakers. It seems the Swedish brand is a hit in Germany, earning the top raking for customer satisfaction from JD Power, and so Volvo would like to thank the home-grown manufacturers for allowing an outsider to excel.<br />
<br />
The Swedish automaker apparently has a strong sense of humor and has release a video that takes a harmless shot at the competition. It's a simple, subtle clip but it does a very good job at expressing its point. <a href="/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/#continued">Click past the jump</a> to watch the video.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Volvo spot hopes to embarass German automakers on their own turf</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/">Volvo spot hopes to embarass German automakers on their own turf</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20048789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jd power</category><category>jd power germany</category><category>video</category><category>volvo</category><category>volvo germany</category><category>volvo thanks germany</category><category>volvo video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20048789/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/09/22/volvo-spot-hopes-to-embarass-german-automakers-on-their-own-turf/20048789/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20048789</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/09/volvo-thanks-germany_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2011 J.D. Power Initial Quality report praises Lexus, Honda, pans Ford]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a></p><a href="/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#continued"><img alt="J.D. Power IQS study graph" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/jdp-iqs-2007-2011.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The calendar has kicked over to summer, and that means <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/j.d.+power">J.D. Power</a> has just updated its Initial Quality report. The 2011 edition of the IQS is a bit surprising, mostly because the quality of new model launches has been trending upward since 2007 for the entire industry on average. The tune has changed for 2011, as J.D. Power notes the first quality decline in four years, though it notes that carryover models performed better than ever - it's the new models that are drawing complaints. It's not all bad news, though, as a few automakers have managed to stand out from the competition:<br />
<br />
According to the study, which tracks buyer satisfaction after 90 days of ownership, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/honda">Honda</a> is a notable leader in quality, and its lineup shares seven awards for specific models. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/accord">Accord</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/accord+crosstour">Accord Crosstour</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic">Civic</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/element">Element</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/fit">Fit</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/insight">Insight</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ridgeline">Ridgeline</a> all receive recognition from J.D. Power. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/lexus">Lexus</a> isn't too far behind Honda, with four models getting the 2011 IQS thumbs up. Lexus also leads automakers in across-the-line quality, with Honda, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/acura">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/mercedes-benz">Mercedes-Benz</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/mazda">Mazda</a> chugging along right behind. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a> showed strong signs of a comeback, motoring all the way from 21st place in 2010 back up to 7th place. Another item of note, is that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/land+rover">Land Rover</a> made a major leap in quality, and has reduced quality issues by 47 problem per every 100 vehicles.<br />
<br />
According to JDP, the leading reasons noted for a drop in quality includes growing consumer dissatisfaction with engine/transmission issues and audio/navigation matters. Chief among those who were dinged by both factors is Ford, which <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/03/mulally-facing-pressure-to-fix-ford-fix-tech-and-quality-glitche/">drew black marks for its complex MyFordTouch/Sync technologies</a>, along with its PowerShift dual clutch transmission behavior. The technology updates saw <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> plummet from 5th place overall (first among non-premium marques) to 23rd place out of 32 brands.<br />
<br />
Read the full report by <a href="/2011/06/23/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#continued">clicking past the jump</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2011 J.D. Power Initial Quality report praises Lexus, Honda, pans Ford</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/">2011 J.D. Power Initial Quality report praises Lexus, Honda, pans Ford</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19975680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>ford quality</category><category>honda</category><category>honda quality</category><category>initial quality study</category><category>iqs</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>j.d. power initial quality report</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power iqs</category><category>jdp</category><category>lexus</category><category>toyota quality</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:04:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19975680/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/19975680/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19975680</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/jdp-iqs-2007-2011_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Autoblog Podcast #222: Chevy Colorado, Porsche 918, Tata Nano for U.S. and J.D. Power Reliability]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevy-colorado-porsche-918-tata-nano-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevy-colorado-porsche-918-tata-nano-fo/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevy-colorado-porsche-918-tata-nano-fo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tata/" rel="tag">Tata</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevrolet-colorado-concept-porsche-918-s/"><img alt="Autoblog podcast logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/autoblog-podcast-3.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px; width: 630px; height: 142px;" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<em><strong><small>Click above for the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes, RSS or listen now!</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
Autoblog Podcast #222 is ready to go, and the crew this week is Chris Shunk, Zach Bowman and Dan Roth. Joining this trio is Dave Sullivan of AutoPacific, and topics range from the next-generation Chevrolet Colorado, to the Porsche 918 Spyder, the possibility of the Tata Nano in the States and J.D. Power Reliability results. Your feedback in our Q&amp;A module winds us up, and we've embedded that in the post below, as well. Thanks for listening, we'll see you next week!<br />
<br />
<b><strong><b><strong>Autoblog Podcast #222: Chevrolet Colorado concept, Porsche 918 Spyder, Tata Nano in the U.S. and JD Power Reliability</strong></b></strong></b><br />
<object application="" data="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf" height="24" type="" width="290" x-shockwave-flash=""><param name="movie" value="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf" /><param name="FlashVars" value="soundFile=http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/podcasts/03-22-11-autoblog-E222.mp3" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object><br />
<ul>
	<li style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none; background-image: url(http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/bullet-circle.gif); padding-left: 15px; background-position: 0px 6px;">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/gm-unveils-next-gen-chevrolet-colorado-ahead-of-bangkok-debut/" style="color: rgb(0, 111, 177); text-decoration: none; outline-style: none;">Next-generation Chevrolet Colorado unveiled</a></li>
	<li style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none; background-image: url(http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/bullet-circle.gif); padding-left: 15px; background-position: 0px 6px;">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/officially-official-porsche-releases-918-hybrid-details-priced/" style="color: rgb(0, 111, 177); text-decoration: none; outline-style: none;">Porsche 918 Spyder</a></li>
	<li style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none; background-image: url(http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/bullet-circle.gif); padding-left: 15px; background-position: 0px 6px;">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/18/report-tata-hopes-to-offer-7-000-car-in-u-s/" style="color: rgb(0, 111, 177); text-decoration: none; outline-style: none;">Tata Nano to be offered in the U.S.?</a></li>
	<li style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none; background-image: url(http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/bullet-circle.gif); padding-left: 15px; background-position: 0px 6px;">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/17/jd-powers-2011-vehicle-dependability-study-names-lincoln-best-b/" style="color: rgb(0, 111, 177); text-decoration: none; outline-style: none;">JD Power Dependability study</a></li>
	<li style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none; background-image: url(http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/bullet-circle.gif); padding-left: 15px; background-position: 0px 6px;">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/17/detroit-news-auto-critic-resigns-was-it-because-paper-bo/" style="color: rgb(0, 111, 177); text-decoration: none; outline-style: none;"><em>Detroit News'</em> Scott Burgess resigns</a></li>
</ul>
<strong>In the Autoblog Garage:</strong><br />
<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/is">2011</a> Jeep Patriot</li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/forester">2011</a> Audi A8</li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/x5+m">2011</a> Hyundai Equus</li>
</ul>
<br style="line-height: 0.8em;" />
<iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="550" hspace="0" id="vhm_qaframe0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" src="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/qa_skel?s=%7BeventId%3A173318%2CcolorScheme%3A%22redblack%22%2CpollMode%3Afalse%7D" style="margin: 0px ! important; padding: 0px ! important;" vspace="0" width="630"></iframe><br />
<div bullet-circle.gif="" media="" style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none;" www.autoblog.com="">
	<strong>Hosts:</strong> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/dan-roth">Dan Roth</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/chris-shunk">Chris Shunk</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/zach-bowman">Zach Bowman</a></div>
<ul style="margin: 0px 0px 10px; padding: 0px; list-style-type: none;">
	<li bullet-circle.gif="" media="" style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none;" www.autoblog.com="">
		<strong>Guest:</strong> Dave Sullivan</li>
</ul>
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 01:28:10<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<hr style="width: 630px;" />
<strong>Get the podcast:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml">RSS</a>] Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<br />
[<a href="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/podcasts/03-22-11-autoblog-E222.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3 directly<br />
<br />
<strong> Feedback:</strong><br />
Email: Podcast at Autoblog dot com<br />
Voicemail: 734-288-8POD (734-288-8763)<br />
<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469"><br />
Review the show in iTunes</a> and take our <a href="http://www.podtrac.com/audience/start-survey.aspx?pubid=JRJrA-gkKy4$&amp;ver=standard">survey</a><br />
<em> </em>
<div id="refHTML">
</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevy-colorado-porsche-918-tata-nano-fo/">Autoblog Podcast #222: Chevy Colorado, Porsche 918, Tata Nano for U.S. and J.D. Power Reliability</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevy-colorado-porsche-918-tata-nano-fo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19888322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevy-colorado-porsche-918-tata-nano-fo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoblog podcast</category><category>autopacific</category><category>chevrolet colorado concept</category><category>featured</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jd power</category><category>porsche 918 spyder</category><category>scott burgess resigns</category><category>tata nano</category><enclosure url="http://www.autoblog.com/podcasts/03-22-11-autoblog-E222.mp3" length="41" type="audio/mpeg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:15:00 EST</pubDate><itunes:subtitle>Autoblog Podcast #222</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Autoblog</itunes:author><itunes:duration>01:28:10</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19888322/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/03/22/autoblog-podcast-222-chevy-colorado-porsche-918-tata-nano-fo/19888322/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19888322</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/autoblog-podcast-3_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #222]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-222/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-222/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-222/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a></p><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469"><img alt="Autoblog podcast logo" border="1" hspace="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/autoblog-podcast-3-1275933205.jpg" vspace="4" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<em><strong><small>Click above to subscribe to The Autoblog Podcast in iTunes</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
We record Episode #222 of the Autoblog Podcast tonight, so check out our discussion topics below. You can use the forum below to drop us your own feedback and questions, or vote on your fellow readers' submissions to help determine what else we discuss this evening. You can subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">in iTunes</a> if you haven't already to hear your question answered.<br />
<br />
<strong><big>Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #222</big></strong><br />
<br />
<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/gm-unveils-next-gen-chevrolet-colorado-ahead-of-bangkok-debut/">Next-generation Chevrolet Colorado unveiled</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/officially-official-porsche-releases-918-hybrid-details-priced/">Porsche 918 Spyder</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/18/report-tata-hopes-to-offer-7-000-car-in-u-s/">Tata Nano to be offered in the U.S.?</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/17/jd-powers-2011-vehicle-dependability-study-names-lincoln-best-b/">JD Power Dependability study</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/17/detroit-news-auto-critic-resigns-was-it-because-paper-bo/">Scott Burgess resigns from <em>The Detroit News</em></a></li>
</ul>
<br />
Subscribe to<strong> the Autoblog Podacast and hear your questions asked:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml">RSS</a>] Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript">var vhm_widget_settings = { eventId: 173318, width: 630, height: 550, colorScheme: 'redblack'};</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/qawidget.js.jsp"></script><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-222/">Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #222</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-222/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19885723/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-222/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoblog topics</category><category>jd power</category><category>podcast topics</category><category>porsche 918 spyder</category><category>scott burgess</category><category>tata nano</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:43:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19885723/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/03/21/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-222/19885723/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19885723</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/autoblog-podcast-3-1275933205_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>