Autoblog http://www.autoblog.com Autoblog http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif Autoblog http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/dynolicious-vs-v-box-and-dynojet/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/dynolicious-vs-v-box-and-dynojet/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/01/dynolicious-vs-v-box-and-dynojet/#commentsFiled under: ,


Click any image for a larger version.

Give us an iPhone application that relates to cars and we're all over it. Apparently, so is the crew at Motive. They took out an Audi S5, mounted a Racelogic V-Box onto the windshield and brought along a Dynolicious-equipped iPhone to see how it stacked up.

The V-Box uses both GPS and yaw sensor data to serve up 0-60 times, 1/4-mile trap speeds and lateral Gs, whereas the iPhone only makes use of yaw information to deliver the same numbers... along with estimated horsepower figures. While Motive wanted to find out how the Dynolicious would do with 0-60 times, we were interested in how close it would come to wheel horsepower given both an estimated weight and drivetrain loss. That meant hitting up the Dynojet at Modacar and strapping our own Project Track Slut onto the rollers.

Read on for both Motive's conclusions and our own.

Gallery: Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet

Continue reading Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet

Dynolicious vs. V-Box and Dynojet originally appeared on Autoblog on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>dynoliciousfeaturediphone dynoiphone dynoliciousiphone dynolicious testIphoneDynoIphoneDynoliciousIphoneDynoliciousTesttestFri, 01 Aug 2008 19:58:00 EST