<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[VW Bus stolen 35 years ago returned in mint condition... to Allstate]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/vw-bus-stolen-35-years-ago-returned-in-mint-condition-to-alls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/vw-bus-stolen-35-years-ago-returned-in-mint-condition-to-alls/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/vw-bus-stolen-35-years-ago-returned-in-mint-condition-to-alls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/timewarp/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a></p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-stolen-bus6-2009nov06,0,5595923.story"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/13window.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
In 1974, this 1965 Volkswagen Type 2 (a.k.a. 'Bus') was stolen from Washington State. Fast-forward to October 19 of this year and custom agents at the Port of Los Angeles open up a container bound for Europe only to rediscover said van. Somehow, the Bus's VIN was still in the LAPD's stolen vehicle database. Guess which 1965 Type 2 is no longer headed for Europe?<br />
<br />
Here's where it gets a little bit foggy, a little bit weird. According to the <em>Los Angeles Times,</em> the cops and the feds can't find the original owner. And the gentleman that restored the thirteen-window Bus to such pristine condition and who was planning on shipping said Bus back to the fatherland is also a victim of the theft - meaning he's off the hook, but out of money. Because way back in 1974, Allstate ("You're in good hands") Insurance paid the then owner $2,500 for the stolen Volkswagen. Which means that Allstate is winding up with the Bus. <br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> The original owner <a href="http://www.khq.com/Global/story.asp?S=11466484">has been located</a>! Her name is Michelle Squires and yes, she would like her Bus back. The reason that she couldn't be located at first is because her last name used to be Carlson. Says Squires, "I don't know if I could afford it because the restored bus is supposed to be around $25,000 now, but I would like the opportunity to talk to Allstate to see if I could get it back." While we think it would be a stellar PR coup for Allstate, Squires should probably prepare to stay separated from her van.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-stolen-bus6-2009nov06,0,5595923.story">Los Angeles Times</a> | Image: Department of Homeland Security]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/vw-bus-stolen-35-years-ago-returned-in-mint-condition-to-alls/">VW Bus stolen 35 years ago returned in mint condition... to Allstate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/vw-bus-stolen-35-years-ago-returned-in-mint-condition-to-alls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19229482/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/09/vw-bus-stolen-35-years-ago-returned-in-mint-condition-to-alls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Allstate</category><category>auto insurance</category><category>AutoInsurance</category><category>Bus</category><category>car insurance</category><category>CarInsurance</category><category>Department of Homeland Security</category><category>DepartmentOfHomelandSecurity</category><category>homeland security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>insurance</category><category>Stolen Car</category><category>Stolen Cars</category><category>StolenCar</category><category>StolenCars</category><category>Theft</category><category>Thirteen-Window Bus</category><category>Thirteen-windowBus</category><category>volkswagen</category><category>Volkswagen bus</category><category>Volkswagen Station Wagon</category><category>Volkswagen Type 2</category><category>VolkswagenBus</category><category>VolkswagenStationWagon</category><category>VolkswagenType2</category><category>VW</category><category>VW Bus</category><category>VwBus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Lieberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: One week after announcing GM departure, Mark LaNeve surfaces at Allstate]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/report-one-week-after-announcing-gm-departure-mark-laneve-surf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/report-one-week-after-announcing-gm-departure-mark-laneve-surf/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/report-one-week-after-announcing-gm-departure-mark-laneve-surf/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091012-707325.html"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/mark-laneve.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
When word got out that Mark LaNeve (right) was <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/07/breaking-mark-laneve-reportedly-leaving-gm-effective-october-15/">leaving General Motors</a> effective October 15, we weren't at all sure where the soon-to-be-former exec was heading. The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> has finally let the cat out of the bag, reporting that LaNeve is leaving the auto business for a marketing gig at Allstate. LaNeve will sign on as the overseer of all marketing initiatives including brand stewardship, strategy and advertising, reporting only to CEO Thomas Wilson. <br />
<br />
LaNeve leaves GM after five years as vice president of marketing and advertising. LaNeve was usurped by the General's own Bob Lutz, who semi-retired in April only to come back a couple months later to help strengthen the company's marketing and advertising initiatives. He is <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/08/fritz-picks-susan-docherty-to-replace-laneve/">is being replaced</a> as vice-president of U.S. sales by former Buick-GMC boss Susan Docherty.<br />
<br />
While his new post at Allstate may not be as glamorous a job as being a VP at a major automaker, the insurer has recently made some hefty profits. The<em> </em>WSJ says Allstate raked in big bucks in the second quarter, after earlier getting hit hard by the economic downturn. In other words, LaNeve's company car perks might not be as generous, but he appears to be in Good Hands.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091012-707325.html">The Wall Street Journal</a> | Image: Bill Pugliano/Getty]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/report-one-week-after-announcing-gm-departure-mark-laneve-surf/">REPORT: One week after announcing GM departure, Mark LaNeve surfaces at Allstate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/report-one-week-after-announcing-gm-departure-mark-laneve-surf/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19193509/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/13/report-one-week-after-announcing-gm-departure-mark-laneve-surf/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>allstate</category><category>auto insurance</category><category>AutoInsurance</category><category>car insurance</category><category>CarInsurance</category><category>fritz henderson</category><category>FritzHenderson</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>good hands</category><category>GoodHands</category><category>insurance</category><category>laNeve</category><category>mark laneve</category><category>mark leneve</category><category>marketing</category><category>MarkLaneve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oh, Buck! Study says deer-automobile accident rate up by 18% over last 5 years]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/car-deer-sandwich-hunt-630-getty-hulton.jpg" /><br />
<br />
What do New Jersey and Nebraska have in common? If you said "absolutely nothing," you'd be right - on any other day but today. Turns out that the Garden State and the Cornhusker State share a very curious stat. Both have seen a 54% increase in deer-related automobile accidents over the last two years. That 54% increase is the largest in the nation, which shows that the problem of deer-related car crashes isn't confined to just one location, but rather a national problem.<br />
<br />
According to a new State Farm study, the number of cars on the road has grown by 7% over the last five years, but the number of deer-related accidents has swelled 18% in that same time period. No reason why is given in the article, but we'd wager it's a combination of 1) more deer and 2) more and more humans living closer to deer populations. The study does, however, provide some pretty eye-opening statistics.<br />
<br />
For examples, State Farm estimates that between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2009 there were 2.4 <em>million </em>accidents in the United States involving <strike>venison</strike> deer. In other words, that's one deer-car mashup every 26 seconds. The worst state for smashing into a deer is and remains West Virginia, where your odds of making contact with a Bambi-like creature are 1 in 39. Michigan remains second most deer-dangerous, though is twice as safe as West Virginia (odds are 1 in 78 that you'll make contact with a deer). And Montana has moved up three places in the rankings, from eighth to fifth. The safest state? Hawaii, where your odds shrink to about 1 in 10,000. Full press release with all the stats <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/28/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/">after the jump</a>.<br />
<br />
[Source: State Farm | Image: Hulton/Getty]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oh, Buck! Study says deer-automobile accident rate up by 18% over last 5 years</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/">Oh, Buck! Study says deer-automobile accident rate up by 18% over last 5 years</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19178040/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/29/oh-buck-study-says-deer-automobile-accident-rate-up-by-18-ove/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accidents</category><category>Deer</category><category>insurance</category><category>State Farm</category><category>State Farm Insurance</category><category>StateFarm</category><category>StateFarmInsurance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Lieberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barrett-Jackson debuts collector car insurance]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/24/barrett-jackson-debuts-collector-car-insurance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/24/barrett-jackson-debuts-collector-car-insurance/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/24/barrett-jackson-debuts-collector-car-insurance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/auction-action/" rel="tag">Auctions</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/special-limited-editions/" rel="tag">Specialty</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/first-t-bird-bj-drew.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br />Barrett-Jackson, the well-known purveyor of collector car events and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/16/barrett-jackson-2009-the-corvettes/">auctions</a>, have decided to roll themselves into the world of custom and collector car insurance. Unlike "mass market" insurance, the type most carry on their daily driver vehicles, custom car insurance addresses the specific needs of the owners of special vehicles. Classic and collector cars are often only driven limited miles, sometimes highly customized, and their market values often higher than other automobiles of the same era -  meaning a simple appraisal is usually out of the question. <br /><br />According to Barrett-Jackson, the auction house polled its customers asking them what they would like to see from the company. With insurance a top priority, the auctioneer decided to team up with AIU Holdings' Private Client Group (formerly AIG) to offer policies which cover vehicles while they are in transit, allow up to 150% of the value documented at the beginning of the policy period, and address diminished value. Policyholders will also benefit from 24/7 roadside assistance. The new <a href="http://www.barrett-jackson.com/insurance/">Barrett-Jackson insurance program</a> was introduced last week at its Palm Beach auction.<br /><br />[Source: Barrett-Jackson]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/24/barrett-jackson-debuts-collector-car-insurance/">Barrett-Jackson debuts collector car insurance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/24/barrett-jackson-debuts-collector-car-insurance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1525454/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/24/barrett-jackson-debuts-collector-car-insurance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>AIU Holdings</category><category>AiuHoldings</category><category>Barrett-Jackson</category><category>car insuracne</category><category>car insurance</category><category>CarInsuracne</category><category>CarInsurance</category><category>collectible insurance</category><category>CollectibleInsurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>policy</category><category>term</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[European insurers quit covering Ford and GM suppliers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/15/european-insurers-quit-covering-ford-and-gm-suppliers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/15/european-insurers-quit-covering-ford-and-gm-suppliers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/15/european-insurers-quit-covering-ford-and-gm-suppliers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e48742c0-b1c3-11dd-b97a-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/11/gm-ford_450.jpg" /></a><br /></p>
<p>Soaked in bad news, GM and Ford received yet another dousing when their three big European credit insurers dropped them this week. Euler Hermes, Atradius, and Coface have all refused to write policies for suppliers trading with both automakers. The three giant insurance companies control more than 80 percent of the world's credit insurance (insurance companies typically pull their coverage when a client stops proving insurers with enough information to calculate a credit risk, or their overall risk profile has deteriorated). Without their credit cover, suppliers will be forced to either trade uninsured, cease trading, or ask for payment up front. Supply issues aside, this news only compounds the automaker's problems as it also weakens investor confidence, already completely slumped. </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e48742c0-b1c3-11dd-b97a-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1">FT</a>, free subs. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/15/european-insurers-quit-covering-ford-and-gm-suppliers/">European insurers quit covering Ford and GM suppliers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/15/european-insurers-quit-covering-ford-and-gm-suppliers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1372319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/15/european-insurers-quit-covering-ford-and-gm-suppliers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Atradius</category><category>Cancelled</category><category>Coface</category><category>Credit</category><category>Dropped</category><category>Euler Hermes</category><category>EulerHermes</category><category>Ford</category><category>GM</category><category>Insurance</category><category>Issues</category><category>Policy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Insurance companies close track day and advanced training loopholes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/20/insurance-companies-close-track-day-and-advanced-training-loopho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/20/insurance-companies-close-track-day-and-advanced-training-loopho/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/20/insurance-companies-close-track-day-and-advanced-training-loopho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-challenge-buttonwillow-april-2008/830239/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/03_lotus_challenge_but_april_450op.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><em><strong><small>Click above for a high-res image</small></strong></em><br /></div>
<br />If you've taken your car to the track for either an open lapping session or an advanced driver education course, you're undoubtedly aware of the potential risks. While most insurance policies say that the car isn't covered if it's participating in a "timed event," that's all changing now that track time is becoming more common.<br /><br />A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/automobiles/19INSURE.html?_r=3&amp;ref=automobiles&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">report by <em>The New York Times</em></a> goes into detail about the loophole and how the big insurers are taking measures to include high-performance driving schools and track days. One interviewee has decided to stop his weekend excursions altogether after learning about the policy changes, and more disturbingly, when another player in the piece asked his insurance company if his Subaru WRX STI was covered during a track event, his policy was dropped six months later.<br /><br />While the well-to-do are largely immune from the new terms, purchasing dedicated track-day toys or additional insurance, those of us with shallow pockets might have to think twice before we wring our rides out as God intended.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/automobiles/19INSURE.html?_r=3&amp;ref=automobiles&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">NYT</a> via <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/nsurance-companies-close-track-day-and-training-loopholes/">TTAC</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/20/insurance-companies-close-track-day-and-advanced-training-loopho/">Insurance companies close track day and advanced training loopholes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/automobiles/19INSURE.html?_r=3&amp;ref=automobiles&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/20/insurance-companies-close-track-day-and-advanced-training-loopho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1347434/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/20/insurance-companies-close-track-day-and-advanced-training-loopho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>driver education insurance</category><category>DriverEducationInsurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>track day</category><category>TrackDay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford to sell Mazda shares to insurers?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/18/ford-to-sell-mazda-shares-to-insurers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/18/ford-to-sell-mazda-shares-to-insurers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/18/ford-to-sell-mazda-shares-to-insurers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mazda/" rel="tag">Mazda</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20081017/ANA02/310179950/1128/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/mazda_logo_big_250op.jpg"  alt="" /></a>While GM is being swamped with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/17/deal-or-no-deal-gm-chrysler-merger-will-be-decided-in-next-two/">persistent rumors</a> surrounding the addition/dissolution of Chrysler, Ford's rumor mill has been heading in the complete opposite direction. It appears Volvo is on the way out of Dearborn, but Mazda may be sneaking through the exit first. Recent reports since disputed by Mazda have Ford <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/16/mazda-may-buy-some-of-itself-back-from-ford/">selling off a portion</a> of its 33.4% stake in the Japanese automaker, which means the Blue Oval would lose majority ownership status. The Nikkei daily in Japan has been all over the Ford/Mazda story, and the latest news involves selling 20% of Mazda to 20 Japanese firms including some insurance companies, leaving Ford with a stake of around 13%. <br /><br />Ford is allegedly unwilling to sell the shares to its competition, so splitting the Mazda shares in 20 small chunks makes picking up all the shares difficult. Besides five insurance companies, parts maker Denso, steel companies, and trading companies are also rumored to be taking part in the purchase. The price of 1% Mazda ownership is in the neighborhood of $40 million, and the total sale could approach $1 billion. Japanese media is reporting that any deal could be announced next month, and neither Mazda or Ford are saying a word at this point.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20081017/ANA02/310179950/1128/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/18/ford-to-sell-mazda-shares-to-insurers/">Ford to sell Mazda shares to insurers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20081017/ANA02/310179950/1128/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/18/ford-to-sell-mazda-shares-to-insurers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1345479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/18/ford-to-sell-mazda-shares-to-insurers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance companies</category><category>InsuranceCompanies</category><category>japan</category><category>mazda</category><category>sold</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM's OnStar will track your annual mileage... but only for your benefit]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/gms-onstar-will-track-your-annual-mileage-but-only-for-your/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/gms-onstar-will-track-your-annual-mileage-but-only-for-your/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/gms-onstar-will-track-your-annual-mileage-but-only-for-your/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/-gm-s-onstar-one-step-closer-to-becoming-big-brother-ar61306.html?var_mode=recalcul"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/onstar_gmac.jpg" /></a>We've heard it before: "We're going to collect the information, but it won't go beyond..." The latest take on "Let us help you with technology" comes courtesy of GM's OnStar, which is offering you the opportunity to have your annual mileage tracked. The info will be given to their GMAC arm, which will then see if you qualify for insurance discounts. That sounds good, right?<br /><br />Of course, no one mentions the other side -- that they can also see if you need a <em>higher</em> premium. "You told us this car was just for weekend recreation, Mr. Smith..." Signing up for the OnStar service is voluntary, so it's not going to start watching you until you say so... yet. But if you really do think you're paying too much, then why not. They probably already know everything about you, anyway... <em>Thanks for the tip, Myles!</em><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/-gm-s-onstar-one-step-closer-to-becoming-big-brother-ar61306.html?var_mode=recalcul">Top Speed</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/gms-onstar-will-track-your-annual-mileage-but-only-for-your/">GM's OnStar will track your annual mileage... but only for your benefit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/-gm-s-onstar-one-step-closer-to-becoming-big-brother-ar61306.html?var_mode=recalcul>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/gms-onstar-will-track-your-annual-mileage-but-only-for-your/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1266237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/gms-onstar-will-track-your-annual-mileage-but-only-for-your/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>big brother</category><category>BigBrother</category><category>gm</category><category>gmac</category><category>insurance</category><category>onstar</category><category>tech</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Steer clear of the youngins on the road and get behind the old guy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/steer-clear-of-the-youngins-on-the-road-and-get-behind-the-old-g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/steer-clear-of-the-youngins-on-the-road-and-get-behind-the-old-g/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/steer-clear-of-the-youngins-on-the-road-and-get-behind-the-old-g/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drive</a></p><p> </p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/2005_ford_crownvictoria_ext_1.jpg" /></p>
<p>For drivers between the ages of 16 and 24, the price of insurance can seem more than a little unfair. While $125 per month could insure a luxury vehicle for someone in their 30s, a 16 year-old couldn't get such a rate for a Pinto. There's a very simple reason for this disparity; young motorists are by far the most dangerous drivers on the road. A study by the Rand Corporations shows that while 13-percent of all drivers are between the ages of 16 and 24, 43-percent of all accidents come from that age group. It's a good thing everybody seems to be on the phone while driving, it may not hurt as much when you don't see that pimped out Neon coming.</p>
<p>While young drivers are an accident waiting to happen, those over the age of 65 are much safer than their unearned reputation may suggest. Senior citizens make up 15-percent of all drivers, but only cause 7-percent of the total accidents. Maybe it's because people are a little more careful when they see a <a href="http://autos.aol.com/ford-crown-victoria-2007:8365-overview">Crown Victoria</a> on the road, but that AARP discount appears to be well-deserved anyway. Next time you're on the freeway and you see a Buick Roadmaster in the right lane, get behind it, it's probably one of the safest places on the road.</p>
<p>[Source: Reuters]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/steer-clear-of-the-youngins-on-the-road-and-get-behind-the-old-g/">Steer clear of the youngins on the road and get behind the old guy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSN1636147820070718>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/steer-clear-of-the-youngins-on-the-road-and-get-behind-the-old-g/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/945863/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/steer-clear-of-the-youngins-on-the-road-and-get-behind-the-old-g/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>65</category><category>accidents</category><category>Driving</category><category>Elderly</category><category>insurance</category><category>Teens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GMAC offers mileage-based insurance through OnStar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/gmac-offers-mileage-based-insurance-through-onstar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/gmac-offers-mileage-based-insurance-through-onstar/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/gmac-offers-mileage-based-insurance-through-onstar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/onstar_domination_growing.jpg"  alt="" />Of all the ways an insurance company calculates a driver's premiums, the one factor that's been left out of the equation is real world mileage. Sure, we tell the our insurance provider how many miles we travel, but if its less than the stated minimum, there's no way to prove we've been on the road less. GMAC and OnStar are planning to rectify the matter, post haste.<br /><br />The plan, which has already been employed on 10,000 drivers in 2004, is to allow subscribers to GM's OnStar system to submit their mileage, and if its less than the 15,000 miles specified in the year-long contract, a discount will be dolled out.<br /><br />The breakdown will allow drivers who travel between 12,001 and 15,000 miles a year to get a 13-percent reduction, while drivers who clock under 2,500 miles will get a discount of 54-percent.<br /><br />Of course, this is all assuming that you're driving an OnStar-equipped GM product and your insurance is through GMAC, but with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/15/onstar-proliferation-at-gm/">GM's planned push of the OnStar system</a>, it might be just another reason for drivers to head on down to their local dealer.<br /><br /><em>GM's press release is posted after the jump.</em><br /><br />[Source: General Motors]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/gmac-offers-mileage-based-insurance-through-onstar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GMAC offers mileage-based insurance through OnStar</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/gmac-offers-mileage-based-insurance-through-onstar/">GMAC offers mileage-based insurance through OnStar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/gmac-offers-mileage-based-insurance-through-onstar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/942281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/gmac-offers-mileage-based-insurance-through-onstar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>gmac</category><category>insurance</category><category>onstar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[British insurer says speed cameras are killing the points rating system]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/28/british-insurer-says-speed-cameras-are-killing-the-points-rating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/28/british-insurer-says-speed-cameras-are-killing-the-points-rating/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/28/british-insurer-says-speed-cameras-are-killing-the-points-rating/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a></p><p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=455339&amp;in_page_id=1770"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/swinton_insurer_points.jpg" /></a>Britain's installation of more speed cameras and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/26/no-more-running-out-of-film-english-speed-cameras-go-digital/">swap to digital</a> means they'll catch even more speeders. That's good for the treasury. According to British insurer Swinton, it isn't good for the points system that insurance companies use to set premiums -- there are too many people getting more and more points to make it a useful criteria. So Swinton says it will no longer automatically raise premiums if drivers get points due to speed cameras, saying "points alone can no longer be used as a yardstick for driver evaluation." Currently in Britain, getting 12 points means losing your license. With 6,000 cameras nabbing two million speeders annually, and mobile phone infractions earning three points, Swinton says "a few years ago insurers might have assumed that a motorist with six or more points on their license was a reckless driver, but that is no longer necessarily the case." With the suggestion that drivers with 6 points could be viewed as "standard," six could become the new zero. We can't wait for that kind of sense to make it this way. Allstate? You listening?</p>
<p>[Source: Daily Mail]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/28/british-insurer-says-speed-cameras-are-killing-the-points-rating/">British insurer says speed cameras are killing the points rating system</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 28 May 2007 17:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=455339&amp;in_page_id=1770>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/28/british-insurer-says-speed-cameras-are-killing-the-points-rating/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/905014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/28/british-insurer-says-speed-cameras-are-killing-the-points-rating/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>britain</category><category>camera</category><category>gatso</category><category>insurance</category><category>points</category><category>speed</category><category>swinton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 17:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top 10 most and least expensive cars to insure]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/18/top-10-most-and-least-expensive-cars-to-insure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/18/top-10-most-and-least-expensive-cars-to-insure/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/18/top-10-most-and-least-expensive-cars-to-insure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://insurelane.com/auto/expensive-cars-insure.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/06lancerevomr_03.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Here's a post all the domestic-or-nothing crowd should enjoy reading. Of the 10 most expensive cars to insure as listed by Insurelane, only one is American-made, and it's no longer produced. And on the least expensive list, seven are Big Three branded (nine if you count Volvo and Mazda as Fords).<br /><br />It should come as no surprise that the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo and Subaru WRX aren't cheap to protect, while GMC Safari and Pontiac Montana owners can probably pay their premiums with the half-eaten Cheerios found in their back seats.<br /><br />As we all know, lots of factors determine your personal rate (age, driving record, number of cars you've totaled right there in your insurance agent's parking lot, etc.), but imports will generally have higher rates over comparable domestics due mostly to more expensive replacement parts.<br /><br />See the top five on each list after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: Insurelane]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/18/top-10-most-and-least-expensive-cars-to-insure/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top 10 most and least expensive cars to insure</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/18/top-10-most-and-least-expensive-cars-to-insure/">Top 10 most and least expensive cars to insure</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://insurelane.com/auto/expensive-cars-insure.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/18/top-10-most-and-least-expensive-cars-to-insure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/759595/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/18/top-10-most-and-least-expensive-cars-to-insure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cheap car insurance</category><category>cheap insurance</category><category>CheapCarInsurance</category><category>CheapInsurance</category><category>expensive insurance</category><category>ExpensiveInsurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance rates</category><category>InsuranceRates</category><category>Mitsubishi evo</category><category>Mitsubishi evo insurance</category><category>Mitsubishi evo insure</category><category>Mitsubishi evolution</category><category>MitsubishiEvo</category><category>MitsubishiEvoInsurance</category><category>MitsubishiEvoInsure</category><category>MitsubishiEvolution</category><category>Subaru WRX</category><category>Subaru WRX insurance</category><category>Subaru WRX insure</category><category>SubaruWrx</category><category>SubaruWrxInsurance</category><category>SubaruWrxInsure</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AAA Shows How Not to Drive Your Car]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/30/aaa-shows-how-not-to-drive-your-car/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/30/aaa-shows-how-not-to-drive-your-car/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/30/aaa-shows-how-not-to-drive-your-car/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/jan2007/bw20070126_878996.htm?campaign_id=rss_autos"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/accident2.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<br />We've all done dumb things in the car before. Eating, talking on the phone, looking at a map, or even reaching for a dropped CD while driving a car will increase your chances of getting into an accident. The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute teamed up with the <a href="http://www.aaafoundation.org/home/">AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety</a> to study driver behaviors and determine what we're doing behind the wheel. To capture driver behavior, 240 drivers in and around the Washington DC area drove 100 specially equipped vehicles that contained five cameras that captured the driver's every move. You'd think with big brother you would be a little more aware of what was going on around you. Amazingly, the cameras captured 82 accidents and 761 near-crashes.<br /><br />At the conclusion of the test, AAA narrowed down the biggest risks as driving while drowsy, speeding, aggressive driving, and taking your eyes off the road for more than two seconds. Speeding and driving drowsy TRIPLED the chances of a resulting accident, and distracted driving and aggressive driving doubled the chance of a crash. AAA's message is clear: if you're late for a meeting, tired, and your tie needs adjusting, catch a cab. You're an accident waiting to happen.<br /><br />[Source: Business Week]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/30/aaa-shows-how-not-to-drive-your-car/">AAA Shows How Not to Drive Your Car</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/jan2007/bw20070126_878996.htm?campaign_id=rss_autos>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/30/aaa-shows-how-not-to-drive-your-car/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/744614/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/30/aaa-shows-how-not-to-drive-your-car/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aaa</category><category>crash</category><category>Highway Safety</category><category>HighwaySafety</category><category>insurance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DaimlerChrysler and insurers agree on settlement payout]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/daimlerchrysler-and-insurers-agree-on-settlement-payout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/daimlerchrysler-and-insurers-agree-on-settlement-payout/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/daimlerchrysler-and-insurers-agree-on-settlement-payout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/daimlerchrysler/" rel="tag">Daimler</a></p><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/02/business/daimler.php"><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="182" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/2995562.jpg" /></a>DaimlerChrysler has finally reached an agreement with its insurers that finally determines who is paying what in a settlement of a lawsuit filed by the automaker's investors over the nature of the merger that created company back in 1998. Chrysler stock holders originally argued that the Daimler-Benz deceived them when describing the joining of both companies as a "merger of equals" and sought an outrageous $22 billion in damages. The lawsuit quotes then DaimlerChrysler head honcho J&uuml;rgen Schrempp (shown at right) as saying in a 2000 interview that calling the deal a merger rather than a takovoer was for "psychological reasons" only. That slip of the tonght cost Schrempp and the company as a whole, which was counting on Schrempp's liability insurance to cover most or all of the $300 million settlement that was reached. Many of the company's insurer's, however, refused to pay. <br /><br />Originally the insurers coughed up $25 million, forcing DCX to pay the rest. Of the remaining $228 million left to be payed on the settlement, the Associated Press is now reporting that insurers insurers have agreed to pay for over $223 million. <br /><br />[Source: Associated Press via International Herald Tribune]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/daimlerchrysler-and-insurers-agree-on-settlement-payout/">DaimlerChrysler and insurers agree on settlement payout</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/02/business/daimler.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/daimlerchrysler-and-insurers-agree-on-settlement-payout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/728081/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/daimlerchrysler-and-insurers-agree-on-settlement-payout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>insurance</category><category>insurers</category><category>jurgen schrempp</category><category>JurgenSchrempp</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shelby GT350 stolen 26 years ago returned to insurance company, not owner]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/09/shelby-gt350-stolen-26-years-ago-returned-to-insurance-company/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/09/shelby-gt350-stolen-26-years-ago-returned-to-insurance-company/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/09/shelby-gt350-stolen-26-years-ago-returned-to-insurance-company/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/timewarp/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><br /><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SportsCarMarket/~3/35239949/809"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/stolen-shelby-gt350ifik.jpg" /></a><br /><br />From the bible of the collector car world comes a cautionary tale of a stolen Shelby and a good lesson in caveat emptor. John Draneas of Collector Car Market recounts the story of a 1965 Shelby GT350 that was stolen back in 1979. The insurance company paid the owner $6500 and the vehicle was never seen from again. Well, not with its original serial number at any rate. While running a cursory check of eBay, Shelby American Automobile Club Registrar Howard Pardee came across a nice looking '65 GT350. With a little legwork, he discovered that the car had been reported stolen and unrecovered back in 1979. He contacted the eBay seller and that's when things got really interesting.<br /><br />The seller had purchased the car in 1980 with a reproduction Shelby serial number tag and a seemingly clean New York title. Pardee also tracked down the original owner who was shocked to learn his Shelby was on eBay and more amazed that, although the bidding was only at $121,000, the value of the car might be closer to $150,000 or even $175,000. He contacted his insurance company and the police and wanted his car back. The car was taken off eBay and impounded, but didn't go back to the original owner. The insurance company had already paid off that claim a long time ago. Case closed.<br /><br />The eBay seller was out of luck too, as he had no legitimate claim to the vehicle unfortunately. He is trying to work out an arrangement with the insurance company so he can perhaps repurchase his car from them and recoup some of his loss. Although he had paid for the vehicle back in 1980, the seller at that time was not legally able to sell the car, as he was an accomplice of the thief. So although he had possession of the vehicle for 26 years and watched the value skyrocket, he is not legally entitled to any of that windfall. Bummer for everybody except the insurance company and the thief ironically, as the statute of limitations has long since passed. A civil suit appears to be the eBay seller's only hope of justice. Read the whole story by following the link.<br /><br /><br />[Source: Sports Car Market]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/09/shelby-gt350-stolen-26-years-ago-returned-to-insurance-company/">Shelby GT350 stolen 26 years ago returned to insurance company, not owner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SportsCarMarket/~3/35239949/809>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/09/shelby-gt350-stolen-26-years-ago-returned-to-insurance-company/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/682007/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/09/shelby-gt350-stolen-26-years-ago-returned-to-insurance-company/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car theft</category><category>CarTheft</category><category>Howard Pardee</category><category>HowardPardee</category><category>insurance</category><category>John Draneas</category><category>JohnDraneas</category><category>mustang</category><category>shelby</category><category>Shelby American Automobile Club</category><category>ShelbyAmericanAutomobileClub</category><category>stolen car</category><category>StolenCar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Car insurance claims drop; industry unable to explain phenomenon]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/car-insurance-claims-drop-industry-unable-to-explain-phenomenon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/car-insurance-claims-drop-industry-unable-to-explain-phenomenon/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/car-insurance-claims-drop-industry-unable-to-explain-phenomenon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=21534"><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/car-driven-through-garage-(resized-250).jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></a>The good news for auto insurance companies is that claims have dropped 15% in the last four years, with the result of a similarly healthy bump in profit. The bad news, at least for an industry that depends on the reliable statistical prediction of trends, is that there is no clear reason for the reduction in payouts for dented sheetmetal and bodily injury.</p>
<p>While modern technology can help prevent collisions, it likely doesn't account for the drop in this particular five-year period (but, check back in another half-decade). More likely is that drivers in the 45-64 age group are the safest on the road, and the average driver continues to get older as the Baby Boomers age. Additionally, it's thought that many drivers opt not to report accidents that don't involve any injuries, and contemporary safety technology may account for an increased number of people who walk away from an accident without so much as a scratch. </p>
<p>One thing seems certain - insurance companies may be making more money from this trend, but it's not being reflected in the average insurance premium. What a surprise, eh?</p>
<p>[Source: Chicago Business via <a href="http://www.instapundit.com">Instapundit</a>]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/car-insurance-claims-drop-industry-unable-to-explain-phenomenon/">Car insurance claims drop; industry unable to explain phenomenon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=21534>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/car-insurance-claims-drop-industry-unable-to-explain-phenomenon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/649078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/car-insurance-claims-drop-industry-unable-to-explain-phenomenon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accident</category><category>claims</category><category>crash</category><category>insurance</category><category>profits</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Survey finds half of UK motorists want elderly drivers banned]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/25/survey-finds-half-of-uk-motorists-want-elderly-drivers-banned/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/25/survey-finds-half-of-uk-motorists-want-elderly-drivers-banned/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/25/survey-finds-half-of-uk-motorists-want-elderly-drivers-banned/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://www.whatcar.com/news-article.aspx?NA=221402"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/img_539831_1_0.jpg" /></a>A survey of 300 drivers in Britain conducted by www.motorinsurance.co.uk found that almost half believe elderly drivers are to blame for country's horrible traffic and should be banned from driving during peak hours of congestion. Other findings reveal that about two-thirds of those surveyed believe elderly motorists can't handle modern road conditions and 49 percent believe that our elders' perceived slow and erratic driving actually causes accidents. <br /><br />The insurance company who conducted the survey, however, believes that its findings aren't supported by the statistics. The survey did reveal that many drivers stereotype older motorists as bad drivers, but the insurance company points out that they're more experienced and often more careful motorists than the average driver.<br /><br />The subject of when a person is too old to drive is certainly a touchy one because it involves a person's freedom of mobility. There's no magic age when the ability to competently operate a motor vehicle disappears, but certainly some of our parents and grandparents have past the point where they can safely roam the open roads.<br /><br />[Source: WhatCar?]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/25/survey-finds-half-of-uk-motorists-want-elderly-drivers-banned/">Survey finds half of UK motorists want elderly drivers banned</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.whatcar.com/news-article.aspx?NA=221402>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/25/survey-finds-half-of-uk-motorists-want-elderly-drivers-banned/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/646605/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/25/survey-finds-half-of-uk-motorists-want-elderly-drivers-banned/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ageism</category><category>elderly drivers</category><category>ElderlyDrivers</category><category>insurance</category><category>older drivers</category><category>OlderDrivers</category><category>UK</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford tacks on another two years to powertrain warranties]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/13/ford-tacks-on-another-two-years-to-powertrain-warranties/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/13/ford-tacks-on-another-two-years-to-powertrain-warranties/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/13/ford-tacks-on-another-two-years-to-powertrain-warranties/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/maintenance/" rel="tag">Maintenance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercury/" rel="tag">Mercury</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060713/REG/60713009/1003/newsletter08&amp;refsect=newsletter08"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/ford-logo.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></a>Ford Motor Company is sweetening its warranty with an extra two years of powertrain coverage for its 2007 vehicles, <em>Automotive News </em>reports. The deal that covers all Ford and Mercury brand vehicles supplements the three-year, 36,000 bumper-to-bumper with a five-year, 60,000 mile powertrain warranty, while the powertrain warranty on Lincoln vehicles ups the coverage to six years and 70,000 miles. Free roadside assistance extends along with the new powertrain warranties.</p>
<p>The move is Ford's effort to provide customers with more value and fend off quality issues.</p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/13/ford-tacks-on-another-two-years-to-powertrain-warranties/">Ford tacks on another two years to powertrain warranties</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060713/REG/60713009/1003/newsletter08&amp;refsect=newsletter08>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/13/ford-tacks-on-another-two-years-to-powertrain-warranties/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/642652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/13/ford-tacks-on-another-two-years-to-powertrain-warranties/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>insurance</category><category>powertrain warranty</category><category>PowertrainWarranty</category><category>quality</category><category>roadside assistance</category><category>RoadsideAssistance</category><category>warranty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IIHS pushing for mandatory stability control]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/14/iihs-pushing-for-mandatory-stability-control/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/14/iihs-pushing-for-mandatory-stability-control/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/14/iihs-pushing-for-mandatory-stability-control/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/09/Autos/iihs_esc/index.htm"><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/stability-control-(resized-450).jpg" align="middle" vspace="4" border="1" /></a></p>
<p>The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety claims that making electronic stability control (ESC) a standard feature in the US could reduce auto deaths by up to one-third, which would result in a whopping 11,000 fewer fatalities per year.</p>
<p>The institute's numbers show that otherwise identical vehicles have a 43 percent reduction in fatal crashes when equipped with ESC. Not only were single-vehicle crashes (most often occurring when a vehicle loses control and leaves the roadway) reduced, but high-speed multiple-car collisions were also less common. Not surprisingly, the number of low-speed crashes remained the same, as ESC doesn't do much good in a parking lot unless some serious hooliganism is&nbsp;involved.</p>
<p>While some call for specific federal legislation that would mandate the technology on all motor vehicles, an upcoming revision to NHTSA's rollover test that will invoke a dynamic handling maneuver is said to effectively require ESC on most vehicles. Approximately 70 percent of SUVs and 40 percent of passenger cars sold in the US in the current model year have ESC as standard equipment. </p>
<p>We've explored the limits of electronic stability control on several&nbsp;SUVs that have recently rolled through the Autoblog Garage, and we can state that&nbsp;modern electronic babysitters&nbsp;are indeed amazing at arresting our intentional attempts at upsetting the vehicles. As such, we&nbsp;definitely&nbsp;support the idea of&nbsp;ESC as&nbsp;standard equipment,&nbsp;just so long as each vehicle also includes a means to <strong>completely</strong> deactivate it. &nbsp;</p>
<p>[Source: Money/CNN]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/14/iihs-pushing-for-mandatory-stability-control/">IIHS pushing for mandatory stability control</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/09/Autos/iihs_esc/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/14/iihs-pushing-for-mandatory-stability-control/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/632937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/14/iihs-pushing-for-mandatory-stability-control/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>electronic stability program</category><category>insurance</category><category>rollover</category><category>safety</category><category>stabilitrac</category><category>stability control</category><category>StabilityControl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PSA: What to do after a car crash]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/psa-what-to-do-after-a-car-crash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/psa-what-to-do-after-a-car-crash/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/psa-what-to-do-after-a-car-crash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><p><a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/Enthusiasts/Mechanics_Tale/Mechanics_Tale_Shock_and_Aw_Shucks.S281.A10518.html"><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/crashed-grand-am-(resized-250).jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Few people think about car crashes <em>before</em> they happen, and immediately after one occurs isn't the time to start. Therefore, putting a few minutes into post-crash preparation makes sense before finding yourself staring into&nbsp;a deflated airbag with a dazed look. Doug Flint from The Car Connection has some great tips - he refers to them as "rules" and has good reasons to do so - and we'd recommend giving his list a thorough read. </p>
<p>From our collective crash experience, encompassing everything from parking-lot fender-benders to leaving the road at 105 mph, we can indeed assure everyone that it's tough to keep your wits about you after unintended&nbsp;physics intervenes with driving. Make some plans now for who you'll call for a tow and how you'll pay, and don't leave the scene until things are sorted out with the authorities, medical personnel, and someone who can give a level-headed assessment of your car's drivability. A good roadside assistance plan that covers all the drivers in your family is a great idea (going through your insurance company will probably yield a discount). </p>
<p>Include every driver in your family in on this planning; even if you've got nerves of steel and aren't rattled by bent sheetmetal... odds are good that there's a less experienced crasher in your household. </p>
<p>[Source: The Car Connection]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/psa-what-to-do-after-a-car-crash/">PSA: What to do after a car crash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thecarconnection.com/Enthusiasts/Mechanics_Tale/Mechanics_Tale_Shock_and_Aw_Shucks.S281.A10518.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/psa-what-to-do-after-a-car-crash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/632520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/psa-what-to-do-after-a-car-crash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accidents</category><category>car crash</category><category>car crashes</category><category>crash</category><category>crashes</category><category>insurance</category><category>safety</category><category>towing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:06:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>