<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[US, Japan trade talks could see scrapping of car and truck tariffs]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/16/us-japan-trade-talks-could-see-scrapping-of-car-and-truck-tarif/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/16/us-japan-trade-talks-could-see-scrapping-of-car-and-truck-tarif/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/16/us-japan-trade-talks-could-see-scrapping-of-car-and-truck-tarif/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a></p><a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2013/04_-_April/U_S_,_Japan_seen_near_deal_on_Trans-Pacific_Partnership_entry/"><img alt="Japan protest Trans-Pacific Partnership" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/japan-tpp.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 400px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Trade issues between the United States and Japan, especially in the automotive sector, have struck a repetitive note for decades: our market is open to them, their market is effectively closed to us. Even though Japan doesn't apply tariffs to cars we export there - whereas we tax Japanese passenger cars 2.5 percent and Japanese light trucks 25 percent - other barriers like Japan's 2,000-unit cap in the Preferential Handling Program and regulatory hurdles have limited the amount of effective trade US companies can conduct there. In 2011 for instance, the US exported $1.5 billion in auto products to Japan but imported $41 billion in auto products from Japan. And <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20130412/BUSINESS01/304120148/obama-japan-pacific-rim-trade-agreement">it's said that</a> Japan sells 120 cars in the US for every car a US manufacturer sells there.<br />
<br />
That's why potential US approval of Japan's request to enter the <a href="http://www.ustr.gov/tpp">Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)</a> is sending automotive criers out in the streets. The TPP is a series of long-running talks to open up trade between the US and 10 other nations (Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam). Last month, Japan asked to join the talks, and the TPP membership would need to assent to the request within 90 days of the next TPP meeting, scheduled for Peru in July.<br />
<br />
It looks like the US will agree to let Japan in and that has some politicians and labor groups concerned, the fear being that Japan will get an even easier time of it here without truly eliminating hurdles over there. Talks between Japan and the US are said to be at "an advanced stage," with the US trying to get some early agreements in advance in sectors like auto, insurance and agriculture before the July meeting.<br />
<br />
The AFL-CIO is wary, just one of the labor groups worried about losing ground just when it's said that American manufacturing is coming back. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>, not a newcomer to being vocal about trade issues with Japan, is against Japan's inclusion to the TPP talks, as is the American Automotive Policy Council. And certain members of Congress are hesitant to let Japan sit at the table, based on past and current unresolved issues. Nevertheless, it doesn't look like the Obama Administration and a large pro-business lobby will turn away from the possibility of adding the world's third largest economy to the proceedings, the US government having already unofficially welcomed Japan to the TPP talks.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/16/us-japan-trade-talks-could-see-scrapping-of-car-and-truck-tarif/">US, Japan trade talks could see scrapping of car and truck tariffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/16/us-japan-trade-talks-could-see-scrapping-of-car-and-truck-tarif/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20539869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/16/us-japan-trade-talks-could-see-scrapping-of-car-and-truck-tarif/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>exports</category><category>ford</category><category>imports</category><category>japan</category><category>tariffs</category><category>tpp</category><category>trade</category><category>trans-pacific partnership</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20539869/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/16/us-japan-trade-talks-could-see-scrapping-of-car-and-truck-tarif/20539869/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20539869</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/japan-tpp_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Goes Both Ways: Free-trade pact sees South Korean brands losing share at home]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/29/goes-both-ways-free-trade-pact-sees-south-korean-brands-losing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/29/goes-both-ways-free-trade-pact-sees-south-korean-brands-losing/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/29/goes-both-ways-free-trade-pact-sees-south-korean-brands-losing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/south-korea/" rel="tag">South Korea</a></p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-18/audi-bmw-see-gangnam-style-sales-boost-in-korea.html"><img alt="Hyundai badge"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/hyundai-badge.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 405px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/10/france-requests-eu-surveil-s-korean-imports/">France has been vocal</a>, but not alone, in noting the rise of the South Korean automakers in Europe. The signing of a free-trade pact in 2011 between South Korea and the EU, along with the especially value-conscious buyers in a crisis-stricken Europe, has seen market share increases measuring in the double digits for <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/kia/">Kia</a> - analysts expect 14-percent growth for the two in 2012.<br />
<br />
A report in <em>Bloomberg</em> has found that there's pain at the other end, too: The pact more than halved import tariffs on European cars headed to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/south+korea/">South Korea</a> to 3.2 percent, and prices are now close enough to domestic offerings for more South Koreans to pay the premium for foreign luxury nameplates and the cachet they confer. Products sold by the five domestic automakers hogged 92 percent of the market last year, and sales have dropped 5.2 percent this year whereas import sales have risen by 24 percent. This will mark the first year that imports claimed ten percent of the market; compare that to 2002, when domestic market share in the world's 11th largest auto market was 99 percent.<br />
<br />
The Germans are at the head of the arrow, counting for 65 percent of imported car sales, but every foreign maker has seen double-digit gains. Analysts think foreign makes could ultimately grab 15 percent of the market.<br />
<br />
The US signed a free-trade agreement <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/new-trade-agreement-may-mean-more-domestics-sold-in-south-korea/">with South Korea last year</a> after <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/05/report-u-s-south-korea-closer-to-new-trade-deal/">years of back-and-forth</a> negotiations. The import tariff on US cars was halved to four percent, and by 2016 there won't be any tariff at all. The hope is that the deal will quickly mean the US will be able to export and sell more than a miniscule fraction of cars to the Asian nation's buyers; the US Internal Trade Commission predicts a 54-percent climb in exports to the country is possible. A side beneficiary of the deal is the Japanese makers: With no free-trade deal between their home country and South Korea, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/06/kentucky-built-toyota-camry-headed-to-south-korea/">manufacturers like Toyota</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/honda">Honda</a> are now looking forward to sending more of their American-made product to the peninsula.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/29/goes-both-ways-free-trade-pact-sees-south-korean-brands-losing/">Goes Both Ways: Free-trade pact sees South Korean brands losing share at home</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/29/goes-both-ways-free-trade-pact-sees-south-korean-brands-losing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20410403/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/29/goes-both-ways-free-trade-pact-sees-south-korean-brands-losing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>exports</category><category>free trade</category><category>Free Trade Agreement</category><category>hyundai</category><category>imports</category><category>kia</category><category>south korea</category><category>tariff</category><category>trade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20410403/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/29/goes-both-ways-free-trade-pact-sees-south-korean-brands-losing/20410403/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20410403</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/hyundai-badge_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[After a long drought, domestic automakers picking up share in California]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/21/after-a-long-drought-domestic-automakers-picking-up-share-in-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/21/after-a-long-drought-domestic-automakers-picking-up-share-in-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/21/after-a-long-drought-domestic-automakers-picking-up-share-in-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-autos-ford-20110617,0,3267643.story"><img alt="Chevrolet dealer in California" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/chevy-dealer-california.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 0px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Californians have a tendency to avoid automobiles from <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/chrysler">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/ford">Ford</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/general+motors">General Motors</a>, opting instead to purchase vehicles from import brands. The proof is in the numbers: <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/toyota">Toyota</a> owns 18.5 percent of the market in California and <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/honda">Honda</a> claims about 12 percent. Of the American brands, Ford leads with 11.6 percent of the Californian market, followed by Chevrolet (8.3 percent) and Chrysler (5.9 percent, including <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/dodge">Dodge</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/jeep">Jeep</a>).<br />
<br />
But there's good news buried in those numbers for the domestic brands, as each of them have posted very slight gains over the last several quarters. According to the <em>LA Times</em>, it's small cars that are finally turning the tides in California. The <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze">Chevrolet Cruze</a> in particular is performing well in the import-rich climes of The Golden State, tripling Chevrolet's market share in its segment over the car it replaced, the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/cobalt">Cobalt</a>.<br />
<br />
Still, it bears mentioning that there <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/11/last-domestic-car-dealership-in-san-francisco-shuts-its-doors/">isn't a single dealership for an American brand in San Francisco</a>, and imports still outsell domestics 4:1 in that large new car market. Clearly, the Detroit Three have a long way to go before they are on equal footing with their import rivals in California.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/21/after-a-long-drought-domestic-automakers-picking-up-share-in-ca/">After a long drought, domestic automakers picking up share in California</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/21/after-a-long-drought-domestic-automakers-picking-up-share-in-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19969973/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/21/after-a-long-drought-domestic-automakers-picking-up-share-in-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>chrysler</category><category>domestic car sales</category><category>domestics</category><category>ford</category><category>gm</category><category>import car sales</category><category>imports</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19969973/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/06/21/after-a-long-drought-domestic-automakers-picking-up-share-in-ca/19969973/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19969973</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/chevy-dealer-california_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Quebec reportedly bans importation of RHD cars for six months to evaluate safety concerns]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/07/quebec-reportedly-bans-importation-of-rhd-cars-for-six-months-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/07/quebec-reportedly-bans-importation-of-rhd-cars-for-six-months-to/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/07/quebec-reportedly-bans-importation-of-rhd-cars-for-six-months-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/05/06/righthand-drive.html#ixzz0jb1 aIASq"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/quebecrhdban.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
According to the CBC, the Canadian province of Quebec is saying "No way, Jose" to importing right-hand drive cars for six months. Even though there are 3,000 RHD cars on the roads and none of them have been faulted for anything, the province's insurance board wants to investigate the safety of such vehicles. The official line is that "they don't always meet Transport Canada safety standards." Perhaps the genuine reason will be known soon, but we're guessing that safety nannies will point to their comparative danger when passing vehicles on single-lane roads.<br />
<br />
For now, the board is going to consult accident reports and ask around before lifting the ban. No more Japanese gray imports for you Quebecois in the meantime.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/05/06/righthand-drive.html#ixzz0jb1 aIASq">CBC</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/07/quebec-reportedly-bans-importation-of-rhd-cars-for-six-months-to/">Quebec reportedly bans importation of RHD cars for six months to evaluate safety concerns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/05/06/righthand-drive.html#ixzz0jb1%20aIASq>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/07/quebec-reportedly-bans-importation-of-rhd-cars-for-six-months-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19427501/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/07/quebec-reportedly-bans-importation-of-rhd-cars-for-six-months-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Imports</category><category>insurance</category><category>LHD</category><category>quebec</category><category>quebecois</category><category>RHD</category><category>right hand drive</category><category>RightHandDrive</category><category>transport canada</category><category>TransportCanada</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19427501/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/04/07/quebec-reportedly-bans-importation-of-rhd-cars-for-six-months-to/19427501/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19427501</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/quebecrhdban_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama administration slaps hefty import tariffs on Chinese-made tires]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/14/obama-administration-slaps-hefty-import-tariffs-on-chinese-made/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/14/obama-administration-slaps-hefty-import-tariffs-on-chinese-made/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/14/obama-administration-slaps-hefty-import-tariffs-on-chinese-made/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125271824237605479.html?mod=rss_com_mostcommentart"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/chinese-tires.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /> <br /> The aggrieved parties are: the United Steelworkers and the U.S. government on one side, Chinese tire companies and the Chinese government on the other. The issues are, as always, jobs and money. The Steelworkers brought a case against Chinese tire companies for dumping tires on the U.S. market over the past few years and in the process putting more than 5,000 people out of work and closing seven domestic tire factories. The case was ruled on by the U.S. International Trade Commission, which found in favor of the Steelworkers. In response, the current administration plastered a 35% tax on Chinese passenger car and light truck tires.<br /> <br /> Naturally, the Chinese are miffed, to say the least. They feel the tariff is contrary to World Trade Organization rules and President Obama's rhetoric on current tariff levels, as well as being a tactic of undue protectionism. When China entered the WTO, the U.S. specifically negotiated the right to protect itself against a sudden wave of Chinese goods, and the ITC feels that China's share of the tire market having grown 14% in four years, with 31 million more tires entering, is just such an occasion.<br /> <br /> Politics could be the decider in this one, however. China can complain to the WTO, attempt to impose its own countermeasures, or at the upcoming G-20 meeting it can simply whisper in Obama's ear, "You know that $1.56-trillion-and-counting deficit you guys need floated..." Nobody wins in the case of escalation, but we have a feeling the fight isn't yet finished.<br /> <br /> [Source: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125271824237605479.html?mod=rss_com_mostcommentart">Wall Street Journal</a> | Photo: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/14/obama-administration-slaps-hefty-import-tariffs-on-chinese-made/">Obama administration slaps hefty import tariffs on Chinese-made tires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125271824237605479.html?mod=rss_com_mostcommentart>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/14/obama-administration-slaps-hefty-import-tariffs-on-chinese-made/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19159355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/14/obama-administration-slaps-hefty-import-tariffs-on-chinese-made/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>chinese tires</category><category>ChineseTires</category><category>government</category><category>imports</category><category>legal</category><category>tariff</category><category>tariffs</category><category>tires</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19159355/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/09/14/obama-administration-slaps-hefty-import-tariffs-on-chinese-made/19159355/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19159355</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/chinese-tires_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Bolivia bans most imports to... curb traffic?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/22/bolivia-bans-most-imports-to-curb-traffic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/22/bolivia-bans-most-imports-to-curb-traffic/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/22/bolivia-bans-most-imports-to-curb-traffic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lifestyle/" rel="tag">Lifestyle</a></p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/18/world/main4676653.shtml?tag=topHome;topStories"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/boliv_ucb.jpg" alt="" /></a>Outside of a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000416/">Terry Gilliam</a> film, where else can you see a used car blessing ceremony, a city of one million people with 535 different public bus routes, roadblocks set up by car mechanics, and kids dressed in zebra suits patrolling crosswalks? Bolivia, that's where. The South American nation, attempting to halt an explosion of automobile buying that's clogging their limited road network, has banned importing used cars more than five years old.<br /><br />The president of Bolivia issued the ban to halt the tide of right-hand-drive cars coming in from Japan. The cars are more reliable than what was on offer before, and so cheap that Bolivians have been buying them up, painting "Taxi" on the sides, only to sit on traffic-choked roads. Shutting down the import trade brings Bolivia more in line with its South American neighbors, and it could open the roads up a bit as well and curb air pollution issues. The mechanics who convert right-hand drive cars to left-hand drive have protested and blocked roads, arm-in-arm with the used car dealers who sell them. <br /><br />Bolivians who wanted the used cars are losing out twice: Used cars less than five years old usually don't make it to Bolivia, and they will be denied "the road trip to bless a new used car at a popular Catholic shrine on Lake Titicaca -- where proud owners splash their new wheels with beer and tape flowers to the side mirrors -- has become a regular rite of passage." Oh, and the kids dressed up as zebras? They get paid by the city to to scold drivers that block crosswalks. It's probably not a bad gig unless you get run over on your first day and spend three days in hospital like one zebra in La Paz. Ah, Bolivia...<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/18/world/main4676653.shtml?tag=topHome;topStories">CBS</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/22/bolivia-bans-most-imports-to-curb-traffic/">Bolivia bans most imports to... curb traffic?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/18/world/main4676653.shtml?tag=topHome;topStories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/22/bolivia-bans-most-imports-to-curb-traffic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1407150/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/22/bolivia-bans-most-imports-to-curb-traffic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bolivia</category><category>government</category><category>import car</category><category>ImportCar</category><category>imported cars</category><category>ImportedCars</category><category>imports</category><category>Japanese car</category><category>Japanese cars</category><category>JapaneseCar</category><category>JapaneseCars</category><category>La Pa</category><category>La Paz</category><category>Lake Titicaca</category><category>LakeTiticaca</category><category>LaPaz</category><category>legal</category><category>south america</category><category>SouthAmerica</category><category>used cars</category><category>UsedCars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1407150/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/12/22/bolivia-bans-most-imports-to-curb-traffic/1407150/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1407150</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/boliv_ucb_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chinese government bans importation of Hyundais from S. Korea]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/16/chinese-government-bans-importation-of-hyundais-from-s-korea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/16/chinese-government-bans-importation-of-hyundais-from-s-korea/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/16/chinese-government-bans-importation-of-hyundais-from-s-korea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssInvestmentServices/idUSSEO18602720081016"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/006_2009genesismisc_450op.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />According to a report by Reuters, the Chinese government has suspended the importation of Hyundai and Kia products from South Korea. The importation ban allegedly stems from complaints filed by dealers that the automaker violated anti-trust laws in China by throwing more support behind its own dealers and thus limiting the support offered to independent retailers.<br /><br />A Hyundai spokesperson confirmed that the automaker has not received import permits since mid-September, but that the Chinese government and Hyundai are working to resolve the matter.<br /><br />While any ban imposed on Hyundai would temporarily hurt the company in China, only about 50,000 units are imported from South Korea each year, with the majority of Hyundai and Kia's combined 520,000 annual sales in China coming from vehicles produced locally in a joint venture between the automaker and Chinese companies.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssInvestmentServices/idUSSEO18602720081016">Reuters</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/16/chinese-government-bans-importation-of-hyundais-from-s-korea/">Chinese government bans importation of Hyundais from S. Korea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssInvestmentServices/idUSSEO18602720081016>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/16/chinese-government-bans-importation-of-hyundais-from-s-korea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1344310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/16/chinese-government-bans-importation-of-hyundais-from-s-korea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ban</category><category>china</category><category>hyundai</category><category>import</category><category>importation</category><category>imports</category><category>kia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1344310/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/10/16/chinese-government-bans-importation-of-hyundais-from-s-korea/1344310/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1344310</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/006_2009genesismisc_450op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Detroit automakers still grapple with perception gap]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/18/detroit-automakers-still-grapple-with-perception-gap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/18/detroit-automakers-still-grapple-with-perception-gap/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/18/detroit-automakers-still-grapple-with-perception-gap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118972842681227168.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_mm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/domestic_perception_gap.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>"Import intenders" is the term used for car buyers who don't even consider domestic vehicles when planning their next purchase. And according to J.D. Power, they make up 54-percent of car buyers. In spite of Detroit's efforts, and in spite of improving testing scores, the Big Three have been unable to sway those buyers to their brands.</p>
<p>When Ford's ad agency put on a promotion called <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/07/video-ford-fools-people-into-telling-the-truth/">Swap My Ride</a>, ordinary folks who drove Ford vehicles for a week raved about them. Buick just joined Lexus at the top of the J.D. Power long-term reliability survey. Yet when market research firm CNW holds focus groups with cars that have all of their branding removed, if people think the car is American their opinion of it automatically drops -- even if they're talking about a Toyota Camry. Having driven the new Cadillac CTS, which is a very good car, the biggest hurdle the brand will face when trying to lure BMW buyers is not the quality of the CTS -- it's the word "Cadillac." </p>
<p>There are a host of potential reasons for the reflex judgment of American cars = lesser quality. Detroit is building better cars than the ones that created the perception in the first place, but Ford, GM, and Chrysler aren't having much luck changing it. They are sure they can get more people to change their minds if they can just get them in the cars -- but they have to get them to even consider getting in the car. A solution is not just around the corner, but the first step will be to keep building good cars .</p>
<p>[Source: Wall Street Journal via <a href="http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightline/3434">Edmunds</a>]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/18/detroit-automakers-still-grapple-with-perception-gap/">Detroit automakers still grapple with perception gap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118972842681227168.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_mm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/18/detroit-automakers-still-grapple-with-perception-gap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/991698/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/18/detroit-automakers-still-grapple-with-perception-gap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cnw</category><category>domestics</category><category>imports</category><category>jd power</category><category>JdPower</category><category>jwt</category><category>market research</category><category>MarketResearch</category><category>perception gap</category><category>PerceptionGap</category><category>perceptions</category><category>swap my ride</category><category>SwapMyRide</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:56:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/991698/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/09/18/detroit-automakers-still-grapple-with-perception-gap/991698/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>991698</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/domestic_perception_gap_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Brits go un-Challenged: No Dodge Challenger for the UK!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/15/brits-go-un-challenged-no-dodge-challenger-for-the-uk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/15/brits-go-un-challenged-no-dodge-challenger-for-the-uk/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/15/brits-go-un-challenged-no-dodge-challenger-for-the-uk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a></p><a href="http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/210325/dodge_challenger.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="top" src="http://www.autobloggreen.com/media/2007/09/dodge-challenger-450.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />The holders of the purse-strings at Chrysler have been juggling and ditching programs since the change of ownership, and the latest move is sure to make fans of American muscle cars over in England particularly sad. When Chrysler announced that they would be building the new Challenger next year, they intended to export the cars to overseas markets as well. However, it now appears that the Challenger will be kept at home and possibly be built in lower volumes than originally planned. Prospective Challenger drivers in the UK will now have to import the cars one at time and only in left hand drive configuration. They should be able to do that shortly after the the production version is launched next February at the Chicago Auto Show. <br /><br />[Source: AutoExpress]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/15/brits-go-un-challenged-no-dodge-challenger-for-the-uk/">Brits go un-Challenged: No Dodge Challenger for the UK!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/210325/dodge_challenger.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/15/brits-go-un-challenged-no-dodge-challenger-for-the-uk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/990087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/15/brits-go-un-challenged-no-dodge-challenger-for-the-uk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>britain</category><category>Dodge Challenger</category><category>imports</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:54:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/990087/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/09/15/brits-go-un-challenged-no-dodge-challenger-for-the-uk/990087/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>990087</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autobloggreen.com/media/2007/09/dodge-challenger-450_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Imports taking up the slack in fleet sales]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/imports-taking-up-the-slack-in-fleet-sales/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/imports-taking-up-the-slack-in-fleet-sales/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/imports-taking-up-the-slack-in-fleet-sales/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070723/SUB/70720096/1078&amp;refsect="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/75024364.jpg" /></a><br /><br />OK, this seems like a no-brainer. As GM and Ford have gradually pulled back from the low-margin fleet sales market, import fleet sales have surged. After all, somebody has to keep the rental car lots filled. It's mostly been the mainline Asian automakers that have stepped in to fill the void. Toyota, Nissan, Mazda and Kia have all increased their corporate sales of cars and trucks, but they still remain bit players overall. About 11 percent of U.S. import brand sales are to fleets so far this year. That is up from just 8% last year. In comparison, the domestics sell 31 percent of their overall production to corporate customers. Although some fleet sales can be quite lucrative, the vast majority of rental car sales are end-of-year surplus that is heavily discounted to move.<br /><br />[Source: Automotive News - sub. req.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/imports-taking-up-the-slack-in-fleet-sales/">Imports taking up the slack in fleet sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/imports-taking-up-the-slack-in-fleet-sales/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/946705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/imports-taking-up-the-slack-in-fleet-sales/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>domestics</category><category>fleet</category><category>fleet sales</category><category>FleetSales</category><category>imports</category><category>rental</category><category>rental cars</category><category>RentalCars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:56:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/946705/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/07/23/imports-taking-up-the-slack-in-fleet-sales/946705/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>946705</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/75024364_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Euro vs. Dollar: More factories may be U.S.-bound]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/euro-vs-dollar-more-factories-may-be-u-s-bound/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/euro-vs-dollar-more-factories-may-be-u-s-bound/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/euro-vs-dollar-more-factories-may-be-u-s-bound/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070723/MANUFACTURING/70720089/1116"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/euro_factories_us_bound.jpg" alt="" /></a>How's this for a wake-up call on the state of the dollar: "If the dollar keeps slumping against the euro, the United States could become the next Mexico -- a low-cost manufacturing haven for European automakers and suppliers." With the dollar at $1.38 to the euro as of now, and expecting to drop further, European makes either need to raise prices, move production to "cheaper" countries like the US, become more efficient, or be happy with less profits. Fewer euros in the till isn't really an option, and price wars are already difficult enough to navigate. That leaves relocation or finding cost efficiencies in other markets. </p>
<p>The article in <em>Automotive News</em> goes on to detail how European manufacturers like BMW and Mercedes are actively moving production to their Spartanburg, South Carolina and Tuscaloosa, Alabama factories, respectively. VW is considering its options for an American plant, but will stick with Mexican operations for now. Audi's approach, since it only sells 10-percent of it's European product in the US, has been to find cost efficiencies in markets like China. Other companies looking for such natural hedges include Magna, which recently lost a huge amount of production at its Austrian plant. The Canadian supplier and manufacturer is looking at building a factory in America to ease the pain. </p>
<p>The market is being watched closely, and there are too many factors in play to know who will do what yet, but some analysts think the dollar might drop to $1.50 against the euro. If so, said John Lawson, chief auto analyst for Citigroup in London, "Either the dollar has to change, or the business model has to change." </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News, sub req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/euro-vs-dollar-more-factories-may-be-u-s-bound/">Euro vs. Dollar: More factories may be U.S.-bound</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070723/MANUFACTURING/70720089/1116>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/euro-vs-dollar-more-factories-may-be-u-s-bound/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/946704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/euro-vs-dollar-more-factories-may-be-u-s-bound/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>exchange rates</category><category>ExchangeRates</category><category>factories</category><category>imports</category><category>manufacturing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:05:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/946704/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/07/23/euro-vs-dollar-more-factories-may-be-u-s-bound/946704/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>946704</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/euro_factories_us_bound_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Saturn's version of Opel Astra to hit next year; Ion gets stay of execution]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/14/saturns-version-of-opel-astra-to-hit-next-year-ion-gets-stay-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/14/saturns-version-of-opel-astra-to-hit-next-year-ion-gets-stay-o/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/14/saturns-version-of-opel-astra-to-hit-next-year-ion-gets-stay-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a></p><p><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060813/BUSINESS01/608130560/1014"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/opel-astra-450.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></a></p>
<p>Saturn's new small car, a version of the well-regarded Opel Astra, should be hitting the shores of North American sometime a bit beyond the middle of 2007. This will replace the not-so-well-regarded Ion, which is now <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bizj/060811/1330582.html?.v=1">scheduled to be produced</a> through March of 2007 - three months longer than originally announced. </p>
<p>The name for Saturn's new compact has not yet been decided, but it may carry over the Ion name, or it may simply use the Astra nameplate. Either way, customers can expect to get the full-on European experience, as the vehicle is expected to arrive from Europe largely unmolested by the same sort of American twiddling that has doomed similar efforts in the past. </p>
<p>In 2008, production is expected to move to a stateside facility - most likely GM's Lordstown plant, where the Cobalt and G5 are produced. This may provide an opportunity for some of the Astra's DNA to improve the existing Delta platform compacts, and we'd be quite pleased if a few of those supercharged Ecotecs were to find their way under the Astra's hood as part of Saturn's Red Line high-performance lineup. </p>
<p>[Source: Detroit Free Press; Nashville Business Journal]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/14/saturns-version-of-opel-astra-to-hit-next-year-ion-gets-stay-o/">Saturn's version of Opel Astra to hit next year; Ion gets stay of execution</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060813/BUSINESS01/608130560/1014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/14/saturns-version-of-opel-astra-to-hit-next-year-ion-gets-stay-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/654190/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/14/saturns-version-of-opel-astra-to-hit-next-year-ion-gets-stay-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>astra</category><category>compact cars</category><category>compacts</category><category>ecotec</category><category>euro</category><category>european</category><category>hatchbacks</category><category>imports</category><category>ion</category><category>opel</category><category>saturn</category><category>small cars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/654190/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/08/14/saturns-version-of-opel-astra-to-hit-next-year-ion-gets-stay-o/654190/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>654190</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/opel-astra-450_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler to play the German card in its advertising]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/29/chrysler-to-play-the-german-card-in-its-advertising/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/29/chrysler-to-play-the-german-card-in-its-advertising/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/29/chrysler-to-play-the-german-card-in-its-advertising/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/daimlerchrysler/" rel="tag">Daimler</a></p><p><a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Daily_Edition/Daily_Edition_Jun_29_2006.S173.A10588.html"><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="278" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/dieter.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>If imports are the new black, Chrysler has quite&nbsp;an ingenious idea: the company will tap DaimlerChrysler CEO Dieter Zetsche in its&nbsp;upcoming advertising campaign&nbsp;to&nbsp;promote the company's&nbsp;German blood&nbsp;and distance itself from the Big 2 and their huge problems.&nbsp;<br /></p>
<p>Chrysler says the ads will be product-focused, emphasizing the company's German ownership and what that says about the&nbsp;quality, design and overall coolness resulting from the synergies between the Daimler and Chrysler sides of the biz. <br /></p>
<p>Dealers say the ads will be tagged with Chrysler's next big incentive push -- employee pricing.</p>
More will be made clear Friday morning when DaimlerChrysler hold a press conference, purportedly to debut the market campaign in question and further elaborate on its incentive drive for the summer.
<p />
<p>[Source: The Car Connection]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/29/chrysler-to-play-the-german-card-in-its-advertising/">Chrysler to play the German card in its advertising</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto_News/Daily_Edition/Daily_Edition_Jun_29_2006.S173.A10588.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/29/chrysler-to-play-the-german-card-in-its-advertising/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/637984/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/29/chrysler-to-play-the-german-card-in-its-advertising/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>daimlerchrysler</category><category>deiter zetsche</category><category>DeiterZetsche</category><category>employee pricing</category><category>EmployeePricing</category><category>germany</category><category>imports</category><category>mercedes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/637984/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/06/29/chrysler-to-play-the-german-card-in-its-advertising/637984/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>637984</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/dieter_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[George Soros said to be pouring $200M into Chery export venture]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/17/george-soros-said-to-be-pouring-200m-into-chery-export-venture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/17/george-soros-said-to-be-pouring-200m-into-chery-export-venture/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/17/george-soros-said-to-be-pouring-200m-into-chery-export-venture/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060616/FREE/60614009/1024/LatestNews"><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="174" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/chery-logo.jpg" id="vimage_2" alt="" /></a>George Soros is said to be looking at investing $200M into Chinese automaker Chery to help its efforts in exporting low-cost vehicles to the United States. How this dovetails into Malcolm Bricklin's efforts to do the same with his Visionary Vehicles company is not yet clear; Bricklin is said to have confirmed&nbsp;the amount of the&nbsp;pending investment,&nbsp;but won't state the source of the money. Soros' fortune, earned mostly by currency speculation,&nbsp;is estimated at $7B, but we're not aware of any prior investment in automotive ventures. </p>
<p>Bricklin earlier this month stated that the&nbsp;stateside arrival of&nbsp;Chery vehicles <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/08/chery-to-take-longer-to-ripen-than-bricklin-expected/">will be postponed</a> and ratcheted down his sales projections. Last month, executives from Chery are said to have <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/chrysler-to-team-with-chery-for-new-small-car/">met with representatives from Chrysler</a> concerning the production of an inexpensive small car for the US market. It would appear that this saga has a few more twists and turns left in it before the first Chinese import lands in America. </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News/Autoweek]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/17/george-soros-said-to-be-pouring-200m-into-chery-export-venture/">George Soros said to be pouring $200M into Chery export venture</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060616/FREE/60614009/1024/LatestNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/17/george-soros-said-to-be-pouring-200m-into-chery-export-venture/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/633961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/17/george-soros-said-to-be-pouring-200m-into-chery-export-venture/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bricklin</category><category>Chery</category><category>China</category><category>exports</category><category>imports</category><category>Soros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:36:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/633961/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/06/17/george-soros-said-to-be-pouring-200m-into-chery-export-venture/633961/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>633961</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/chery-logo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Is China playing around with trade rules to maintain an advantage?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/is-china-playing-around-with-trade-rules-to-maintain-an-advantag/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/is-china-playing-around-with-trade-rules-to-maintain-an-advantag/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/is-china-playing-around-with-trade-rules-to-maintain-an-advantag/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060531/AUTO02/605310301/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/Cadillac-China-(resized-250).JPG" /></a>Officials from the US and European Union have been prompted to file a complaint against China with the World Trade Organization (WTO), alleging that the up-and-coming Asian country has been manipulating taxes and tariffs on imported auto parts in an attempt to provide protection for domestic Chinese auto manufacturers.</p>
<p>China was to ramp down its protectionist efforts on auto parts as a condition of joining the WTO, and for the most part, tariffs and taxes on vehicles and auto parts have steadily dropped over the last four years. Tariffs on imported vehicles remain higher than those on components, however, which leads companies such as Cadillac to import "knock-down" kits of components that are then assembled into complete vehicles on the mainland. China claims that such actions are merely efforts to get around the higher tariffs on complete vehicles (well, <em>duh</em>), and is now looking to tax such component kits at the same rate as completed vehicles. </p>
<p>How this whole story will play out - and what effect it will have on foreign companies who do business in China - is yet unknown, but it seems clear that we'll have several years before anything resembling "free" or "fair" trade takes place between China and the West. </p>
<p>[Source: Detroit News]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/is-china-playing-around-with-trade-rules-to-maintain-an-advantag/">Is China playing around with trade rules to maintain an advantage?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060531/AUTO02/605310301/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/is-china-playing-around-with-trade-rules-to-maintain-an-advantag/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/623912/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/is-china-playing-around-with-trade-rules-to-maintain-an-advantag/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadillac</category><category>China</category><category>chinese</category><category>fair trade</category><category>free trade</category><category>imports</category><category>tariffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:33:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/623912/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/06/01/is-china-playing-around-with-trade-rules-to-maintain-an-advantag/623912/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>623912</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/Cadillac-China-(resized-250)_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Harris poll ranks the top "buzz-worthy" vehicles from 2005]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hummer/" rel="tag">Hummer</a></p><p><a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=1055"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/Charger-SRT8-(resized-450).JPG" /></a></p>
<p>Of the vehicles released in 2005, the Chevrolet Cobalt generated the most "buzz" among Generation Y buyers, with the Hummer H3 attracting the most attention from grunge-era Gen Xers. Baby-boomers flocked to Dodge's retro-esque Charger, and the grey-haired set went bonkers for the Ford Five Hundred. The Charger was the only vehicle to get a top-5 mention by both Gen Y and pre-boomers, which makes us wonder if the&nbsp;Buick Lucerne will&nbsp;be able achieve the same generation crossover feat in&nbsp;next year's survey.</p>
<p>The survey doesn't appear biased towards domestics, so&nbsp;the near-shutout of foreign nameplates that appear on the survey (only the Lexus RX400h and Mercedes CLS managed to move the buzz-meter) has got to be encouraging for US manufacturers - if indeed it's not simply a single year aberration or a result of some&nbsp;hidden statistical slant. &nbsp;</p>
<p>A large "WTF?" goes to buyers in the Hybrid/Alternative Fuel category, who apparently got all abuzz over the Dodge Charger. Oh, yeah, we forgot - there is indeed the&nbsp;highly popular&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2005/08/27/dodge-introduces-charger-hybrid-kind-of/">Charger Hybrid</a>. And don't ask us why the Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 appears in this survey, as it's a MY2007 introduction that was not available during the period of the survey. </p>
<p>A tip o' the hat goes to GM's <a href="http://fyi.gmblogs.com/2006/05/gms_buzzworthy_cars_1.html">FYI Blog</a>. </p>
<p>[Source: Harris Interactive; the full press release is posted after the jump]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Harris poll ranks the top "buzz-worthy" vehicles from 2005</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/">Harris poll ranks the top "buzz-worthy" vehicles from 2005</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 31 May 2006 14:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=1055>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/623368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charger</category><category>cobalt</category><category>domestics</category><category>Five Hundred</category><category>H3</category><category>harris</category><category>harris interactive</category><category>HUMMER</category><category>imports</category><category>kelly blue book</category><category>poll</category><category>survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:04:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/623368/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/05/31/harris-poll-ranks-the-top-buzz-worthy-vehicles-from-2005/623368/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>623368</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/Charger-SRT8-(resized-450)_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New ad campaign for the Big 3 plays the "Buy American" card]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/new-ad-campaign-for-the-big-3-plays-the-buy-american-card/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/new-ad-campaign-for-the-big-3-plays-the-buy-american-card/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/new-ad-campaign-for-the-big-3-plays-the-buy-american-card/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060512/AUTO01/605120414/1148"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/Level-Field-Institute-ad-%28resized-250%29.JPG" /></a>The <a href="http://www.levelfieldinstitute.org/">Level Field Institute</a>,&nbsp;a group comprised of retired domestic auto workers, is telling consumers "What you drive, drives America" in an attempt to convince car buyers to purchase vehicles from the-group-of-nominally-domestic-automakers-previously-referred-to-as-the-Big-3. The ad campaign uses a variety of statistics to drive home its point, including the fact that direct employment by the US automakers is roughly 3.5 times that of the "transplants" (foreign automakers&nbsp;that produce vehicles in the US). Jason Vines, Chrysler's VP of Communications and always someone that's good for a quote, states "Baseball, hot dogs and Toyota? Sorry, it doesn't ring a bell."</p>
<p>While we fully support the concept of buying domestically-produced consumer products, we also feel that this campaign has an aura of desperation about it - as is often&nbsp;the case&nbsp;when an advertising campaign deviates from focus on the product itself. There is also the simple difficulty in determining the origin of a vehicle; as we posted earlier this week, the domestic <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/08/the-content-gap-is-closing-between-domestic-and-foreign-vehi/">content "gap" is closing</a> between "domestic" and "foreign" vehicles, and the information displayed to consumers on the origin of a vehicle's content is often difficult to understand (or perhaps even misleading).</p>
<p>[Source: Detroit News]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/new-ad-campaign-for-the-big-3-plays-the-buy-american-card/">New ad campaign for the Big 3 plays the "Buy American" card</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 12 May 2006 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060512/AUTO01/605120414/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/new-ad-campaign-for-the-big-3-plays-the-buy-american-card/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/617670/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/new-ad-campaign-for-the-big-3-plays-the-buy-american-card/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Canada</category><category>domestics</category><category>imports</category><category>Japan</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Made in the USA</category><category>Mexico</category><category>plant closings</category><category>transplants</category><category>US</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 13:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/617670/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/05/12/new-ad-campaign-for-the-big-3-plays-the-buy-american-card/617670/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>617670</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/Level-Field-Institute-ad-%28resized-250%29_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Too Fast, Too Furious... Too 2004?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/28/too-fast-too-furious-too-2004/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/28/too-fast-too-furious-too-2004/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/28/too-fast-too-furious-too-2004/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sema/" rel="tag">SEMA Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060427/FREE/60424020/1065"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/_MG_0035.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a><em>AutoWeek</em>attended the SEMA International Auto Salon,&nbsp;a car show for sport compacts and the segment of the aftermarketindustry serving sport compacts, and <em>AW</em> writers were sad to see the sorry state the Salon has come to --moving from the Los Angeles Convention Center to Atlantic City, and finally, to&nbsp;t<!--StartFragment -->he FortWashington Expo Center, where the show was small, the roof leaked, and the fit and finish was less than high-end. Theycame away wondering, is the sport compact market on its way out?</p>
<p>Maybe, but probably not. The moral of the story -- consumer tastes are changing away from Honda Civics and theirilk&nbsp;in favor of a variety of different cars. Sport compact or not, in these hard economic times only the fittestwill survive. That said, we fully expect the nascent European compact class (Volkswagen GTI, Audi A3, MINI Cooper,Volvo S30, etc.) to strike a major chord with the tuner culture, perhaps eating into the largely Japanese-badgedfront-wheel-drive import scene.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/28/too-fast-too-furious-too-2004/">Too Fast, Too Furious... Too 2004?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060427/FREE/60424020/1065>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/28/too-fast-too-furious-too-2004/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/612847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/28/too-fast-too-furious-too-2004/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Audi A3</category><category>AudiA3</category><category>Fast and the Furious</category><category>FastAndTheFurious</category><category>Fort Washington Expo</category><category>FortWashingtonExpo</category><category>GTI</category><category>Honda Civic</category><category>HondaCivic</category><category>Hot Import Nights</category><category>HotImportNights</category><category>Imports</category><category>LA COnvention</category><category>LaConvention</category><category>Los Angeles Convention</category><category>LosAngelesConvention</category><category>MINI Cooper</category><category>MiniCooper</category><category>SEMA</category><category>sport compact</category><category>SportCompact</category><category>Too Fast Too Furious</category><category>TooFastTooFurious</category><category>Tuner Culture</category><category>TunerCulture</category><category>Volkswagen GTI</category><category>VolkswagenGti</category><category>Volvo S30</category><category>VolvoS30</category><category>VW GTI</category><category>VwGti</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/612847/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/04/28/too-fast-too-furious-too-2004/612847/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>612847</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/_MG_0035_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>