<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai releases Genesis Coupe performance numbers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/hyundai-releases-genesis-coupe-performance-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/hyundai-releases-genesis-coupe-performance-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/hyundai-releases-genesis-coupe-performance-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe/702649/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/genesiscoupe_356_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><strong><em><small>Click above for high-res gallery of the Hyundai Genesis Coupe</small></em></strong><br /></div>
<br />The Genesis Coupe is being launched in South Korea this week, and we've <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/13/hyundai-genesis-coupe-tested-in-korea/">already heard</a> from<em> CAR </em>regarding their testing of the 310-hp 3.8L V6 model. Hyundai released its own performance numbers for the hotly anticipated RWD coupe, and it also included information for the turbocharged 2.0L base model. While CAR achieved a fairly respectable 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds for the V6 model, Hyundai is claiming a sprint to 62 takes 6.3 seconds.<br /><br />In the Korean home market, the force-fed 2.0L base model will achieve 223 hp and 220 lb-ft with premium fuel, and 210 hp with regular. U.S. customers will reportedly only receive the 210-hp version, and you'll hit that magic number at 6,000 RPM while the turbocharged nature of the 2.0L helps you hit peak torque at a low 2,000 RPM. Hyundai claims the base Coupe's 0-62 time is a rather leisurely 8.3 seconds, but we're guessing that plenty of enthusiasts will get their hands underhood in an effort to greatly boost those numbers.<br /><br />Korean market pricing starts at 23,200,000 Korean won for the base model and 33,920,000 won for the top of the line V6 model. That's $18,728 and $27,382 in U.S. currency, but Hyundai won't announce official U.S. pricing until closer to the Genesis Coupe's spring 2009 debut.<br /><br /><em><strong>UPDATE</strong>: A source inside Hyundai has told Autoblog to expect a 0-60 time of around 7.5 seconds for the 2.0-liter turbocharged Genesis Coupe. The combination of less weight (under 3,500 pounds) and a retuned engine (Hyundai is still months away from launching the Coupe in the U.S.) will bring performance up</em> to par, compared to its Korean counterpart.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe/low/">2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/hyundai_gen_coupe_20080921_0020_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/hyundai_gen_coupe_20080921_0021_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/hyundai_gen_coupe_20080924_0022_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/hyundai_gen_coupe_20080924_0029_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/hyundai_gen_coupe_20080924_0028_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.worldcarfans.com/9081015.001/hyundai-announces-genesis-coupe-performance-specs">World Car Fans</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/hyundai-releases-genesis-coupe-performance-numbers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyundai releases Genesis Coupe performance numbers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/hyundai-releases-genesis-coupe-performance-numbers/">Hyundai releases Genesis Coupe performance numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.worldcarfans.com/9081015.001/hyundai-announces-genesis-coupe-performance-specs>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/hyundai-releases-genesis-coupe-performance-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1342881/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/hyundai-releases-genesis-coupe-performance-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>genesis coupe</category><category>genesis coupe performance</category><category>GenesisCoupe</category><category>GenesisCoupePerformance</category><category>horsepower</category><category>Hyundai</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Honda discovers 3.5L V6 more powerful than first thought]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/13/honda-discovers-3-5l-v6-more-powerful-than-first-thought/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/13/honda-discovers-3-5l-v6-more-powerful-than-first-thought/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/13/honda-discovers-3-5l-v6-more-powerful-than-first-thought/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/18870_preview_opt.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />There is nothing better than finding a few stray horses that were previously unaccounted for. Honda engineers were running tests on the Accord's 3.5L V6 engine when they realized it was spinning the dyno with more horsepower and torque than originally thought. It caught the Honda team off guard, as the powerplant has received no design changes to warrant the extra power. Regardless, the marketing folks have been quick to update the power ratings of the 3.5-liter 24-Valve SOHC i-VTEC powerplant. Here are the new numbers for 2009: 271 hp replaces 268 hp on all V6 models, 254 lb-ft. replaces 248 lb-ft. on automatic transmission models and 251 lb-ft. replaces 248 lb-ft. on manual transmission models. One would have to assume that the 2008 model made the same power, it just wasn't noticed... <em>Thanks for the tip, Steve!</em>
<p> </p>
<p>[Source: Honda]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/13/honda-discovers-3-5l-v6-more-powerful-than-first-thought/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Honda discovers 3.5L V6 more powerful than first thought</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/13/honda-discovers-3-5l-v6-more-powerful-than-first-thought/">Honda discovers 3.5L V6 more powerful than first thought</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/13/honda-discovers-3-5l-v6-more-powerful-than-first-thought/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1283312/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/13/honda-discovers-3-5l-v6-more-powerful-than-first-thought/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3.5-liter</category><category>changed</category><category>Honda</category><category>horsepower</category><category>new</category><category>power</category><category>rating</category><category>SOHC i-VTEC</category><category>SohcI-vtec</category><category>torque</category><category>updated</category><category>V-6</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-gt-r-us-spec-1/546259/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/nissangtrdyno.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>For car buffs it's baffling (and pretty cool, too) to see a $70,000 Nissan weighing nearly 4,000 lbs whoop up on lighter, more powerful cars. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/porsche-911-turbo-chevrolet-corvette-z06-and-u-s-spec-nissan/">GT-R lapped more than five seconds quicker</a> than a Corvette Z06 and 911 Turbo at Buttonwillow Raceway during <em>Road and Track's</em> test, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/i-candd-i-tests-gt-r-runs-11-5-second-quarter/"><em>Car and Driver</em> pulled off some pretty incredible numbers</a> during theirs, running 0-60 mph in 3.3 seconds and the quarter mile in just 11.5 seconds. However, some have questioned the numbers. How does the GT-R, which has a weight-to-horsepower ratio 25% higher than the Turbo and Z06, beat both around the racetrack?</p>
<p><em>Motor Trend</em> questioned the numbers too, and decided to check for themselves when they received a GT-R to review. They took the GT-R over to K&amp;N Engineering in San Bernardino, CA, who strapped it to their in-house chassis dyno to see just how much horsepower the car was making. Three separate runs in fourth gear netted an average of about 430 horsepower at the wheels. Assuming a conservative 15% drivetrain loss, the GT-R is actually producing more than 500 horsepower and 500 lb-ft torque at the flywheel. That helps explain the numbers, but it won't give 911 Turbo and Corvette Z06 owners any comfort. <em>Thanks for the tip, Jake!</em></p>
<p><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-gt-r-us-spec-1/low/">Nissan GT-R (US-spec)</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-gt-r-us-spec-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/2009_gt-r01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-gt-r-us-spec-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/2009_gt-r010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-gt-r-us-spec-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/2009_gt-r011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-gt-r-us-spec-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/2009_gt-r012_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-gt-r-us-spec-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/2009_gt-r013_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0803_2009_nissan_gt_r_dyno_test">Motor Trend</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/">Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0803_2009_nissan_gt_r_dyno_test>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1151927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GT-R</category><category>horsepower</category><category>Nissan</category><category>Nissan GT-R</category><category>Nissan GT-R dyno numbers</category><category>NissanGt-r</category><category>NissanGt-rDynoNumbers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Phillips]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2008 Callaway Corvette introduced with 580 HP,  C16 bumped to 650 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/2008-callaway-corvette-introduced-with-580-hp-c16-bumped-to-65/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/2008-callaway-corvette-introduced-with-580-hp-c16-bumped-to-65/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/2008-callaway-corvette-introduced-with-580-hp-c16-bumped-to-65/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tunertuesdays/" rel="tag">Tuners</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/callaway/" rel="tag">Callaway</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-callaway-corvette/602683/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/engine_opt.jpg" /></a><em> <br />click above to view more high-res pics of the 2008 Callaway Corvette</em></p>
<p>Callaway, the Connecticut-based Corvette tuner par excellence, has just announced that its 2008 Callaway Corvette will come with a new supercharger package that bumps power in the C6 Corvette to 580 horsepower. Buyers need only hand over $18,500 for the additional 150 horsepower over a stock 430-hp 6.2L LS3 V8, but will also get a host of engine improvements, a 3-year/36,000 mile warranty and still be able to meet California's strict emissions standards.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-callaway-corvette/602687/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/silvergun_opt.jpg" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Callaway has also announced a new, more powerful supercharger for its super-Vette, the C16. The new spool increases output of the hand-built LS3 engine from 616 to 650 hp. It's also fitted with new cylinder heads and valvetrain, a custom cold-air intake, special free-flowing exhaust system and remapped ECU, in addition to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/19/stoptech-launches-new-carbon-ceramic-brake-system-on-callaway-c1/">carbon-ceramic brakes</a>, suspension and wheels. Callaway offers the C16 with its custom bodywork and leather interior in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/23/montreal-auto-show-callaway-unveils-production-c16/">coupe</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/02/new-york-preview-new-images-of-the-callaway-c16-cabrio/">convertible</a> forms for about $150k, or double that for the stunning <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/21/pebble-beach-week-2007-callaway-speedster-flashes-into-town/">Speedster</a>. The extra 34 harnessed horses should help the updated C16 break its already-impressive 3.3-second 0-60 time, 11-second &amp;frac14; mile and 210 mph top end.</p>
<p>[Source: Callaway]</p>
<p><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-callaway-corvette/low/">2008 Callaway Corvette</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-callaway-corvette/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/silvergun_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-callaway-corvette/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/corvetteback_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-callaway-corvette/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/corvettefront_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-callaway-corvette/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/engine_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-convertible/low/">Callaway C16 Cabrio</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-convertible/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/c16_cabrio_hi_14_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-convertible/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/c16_cabrio_hi_13_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-convertible/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/c16_cabrio_hi_12_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-convertible/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/c16_cabrio_hi_15_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-convertible/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/c16_cabrio_hi_08_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-speedster/low/">Callaway C16 Speedster</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-speedster/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/callawayspeedster_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-speedster/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/speedsterrear_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-speedster/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/speedster_cowl_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-speedster/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/c16_pb_10a_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/callaway-c16-speedster/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/c16_pb_11a_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/2008-callaway-corvette-introduced-with-580-hp-c16-bumped-to-65/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2008 Callaway Corvette introduced with 580 HP,  C16 bumped to 650 HP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/2008-callaway-corvette-introduced-with-580-hp-c16-bumped-to-65/">2008 Callaway Corvette introduced with 580 HP,  C16 bumped to 650 HP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/2008-callaway-corvette-introduced-with-580-hp-c16-bumped-to-65/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1094266/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/2008-callaway-corvette-introduced-with-580-hp-c16-bumped-to-65/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>616</category><category>650</category><category>c16</category><category>callaway</category><category>corvette</category><category>horsepower</category><category>speedster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford Fiesta and Focus ST get more power]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/ford-fiesta-and-focus-st-get-more-power/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/ford-fiesta-and-focus-st-get-more-power/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/ford-fiesta-and-focus-st-get-more-power/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/214500/fast_ford.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/eurofocusst-(3)_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a></p>
<p>While Ford keeps on cranking out newer, faster versions of the Mustang for American customers, Ford of Europe is preparing new packages for the Fiesta ST and Focus ST hot-hatches to do the same thing.</p>
<p>The &pound;950 package for the diminutive Fiesta ST pushes power up to 185 hp from its 2-liter four, which is expected to come from upgraded engine management, cylinder heads, a new camshaft and exhaust. All that adds an extra 37 hp to the standard Fiesta ST's 148, dropping a sprint to 60 down half a second to eight flat. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, the larger, more powerful Focus ST gets treated to a similar upgrade, worth about &pound;1,500. This package is tipped to include a new air filter, ECU and exhaust, amounting to a similar 38-horsepower increase in power for a total of 260 that drops the 0-60 blitz down to 5.5 seconds. Thank heavens Ford sells a version of the Focus here that's just as fast. Oh, wait...</p>
Get this: current ST owners in Europe can also get this package retrofitted to currently-owned cars, along with a full-factory warranty on the parts. Europeans, then, will just have to make do with these hot hatch packages a while longer before the 300+ horsepower <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/17/european-ford-focus-rs-teaser-hits-the-net-sales-begin-in-2009/">Focus RS arrives in 2009</a>, at which point Blue Oval fanboys from the U.S. will invade your countries with the intent to drive. <br /><br />[Source: Auto Express]<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-st-eu/low/">2008 Ford Focus ST</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-st-eu/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/eurofocusst-(1)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-st-eu/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/eurofocusst-(2)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-st-eu/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/eurofocusst-(3)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-st-eu/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/eurofocusst-(4)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-st-eu/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/eurofocusst-(5)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/ford-fiesta-and-focus-st-get-more-power/">Ford Fiesta and Focus ST get more power</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/214500/fast_ford.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/ford-fiesta-and-focus-st-get-more-power/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1075381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/ford-fiesta-and-focus-st-get-more-power/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>185</category><category>260</category><category>europe</category><category>fiesta</category><category>focus</category><category>ford</category><category>hatch</category><category>horsepower</category><category>hot</category><category>modifications</category><category>rs</category><category>st</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Enter the Rumormill: Lexus developing lightweight, 429-hp IS-F/R]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/12/enter-the-rumormill-lexus-developing-lightweight-429-hp-is-f-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/12/enter-the-rumormill-lexus-developing-lightweight-429-hp-is-f-r/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/12/enter-the-rumormill-lexus-developing-lightweight-429-hp-is-f-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a></p><p><a href="http://news.windingroad.com/countriesmarkets/japan/japan-report-is-lexus-working-on-an-is-fr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/fiveaxisis-f---03_450-op.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/la-2007-lexus-is-f-gets-fiveaxisetized/">FiveAxis Lexus IS-F at the 2007 LA Auto Show</a></em></p>
<p>When Lexus set out to target the likes of the BMW M3, Audi RS4 and Mercedes C63 AMG with its spankin' new IS-F, they weren't kidding. The V8 super-sedan turned out to be an astonishing departure for the Japanese luxury brand that cut its teeth on rock-solid reliability and luxurious comfort. Not content resting on its laurels, rumors are surfacing that Toyota is hard at work preparing an even more extreme variant, being dubbed in the motoring press as the IS-F/R. </p>
<p>Reports have Lexus tweaking an extra 12 horsepower and 4 lb-ft of torque out of the Yamaha-sourced 417-hp/372 lb-ft, 5.0-liter V8 for an increased output of 429 hp and 376 lb-ft of torque. A modest increase, it would seem, until you look at the targeted 220-lb weight reduction. And as we all know, a little more power unburdened by significantly less weight is a winning formula. Just ask the likes of the Ferrari 430 Scuderia, Lamborghini Gallardo SUperleggera, Porsche 911 GT2 et al. </p>
<p>The rumored price of admission? A whopping 11 million yen in Japan, compared to the 7.7 million yen for what suddenly looks by comparison like a rather ordinary "standard" IS-F. Pursuit of Perfection, indeed.</p>
<p>[Source: Winding Road]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/12/enter-the-rumormill-lexus-developing-lightweight-429-hp-is-f-r/">Enter the Rumormill: Lexus developing lightweight, 429-hp IS-F/R</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.windingroad.com/countriesmarkets/japan/japan-report-is-lexus-working-on-an-is-fr/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/12/enter-the-rumormill-lexus-developing-lightweight-429-hp-is-f-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1061294/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/12/enter-the-rumormill-lexus-developing-lightweight-429-hp-is-f-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>high performance</category><category>HighPerformance</category><category>horsepower</category><category>is-f</category><category>is-f/r</category><category>is-fr</category><category>lexus</category><category>lightweight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pull my dyno - Automobile puts the IS-F on the rollers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/25/pull-my-dyno-automobile-puts-the-is-f-on-the-rollers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/25/pull-my-dyno-automobile-puts-the-is-f-on-the-rollers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/25/pull-my-dyno-automobile-puts-the-is-f-on-the-rollers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a></p><a href="http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/lexus/0710_2008_lexus_is-f_dyno_chart"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/lexus_dyno_1.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Lexus is billing the IS-F as "Everything you thought we weren't," and the potential is certainly there. The engine bay is filled with 5 liters of 4-valve V8 putting out 416 horsepower and 371 pound-feet of torque. The Minilite-esque wheels hide a Brembo braking system with six piston front calipers and cross-drilled rotors 14.2 inches in diameter. The sill extensions wrap up the front fenders to form a styling detail reminiscent of extractor vents, and the rest of the body has been tweaked in the wind tunnel to improve high speed aerodynamics. It all sounds good when you read the spec sheet, and the car does at least look aggressive . What everyone's dying to know, though, is <em>"has Lexus done it this time?" </em>Automobile magazine had the same burning curiosity, and they just also happened to have an IS-F sitting in their lot. <br /><br />In no time, they headed over to their local Dynojet. The result? Well, they're a little disappointed, and they're calling the torque delivery peaky. Looking at the dyno graph, we're not sure we'd agree entirely with that assessment. There's at least 225 lb-feet at the wheels from 1,800 rpm, topping out at 318 lb-ft. First, let's point out that 15 percent torque loss through a drivetrain including an <strong>eight speed automatic</strong> is pretty phenomenal. Secondly, the torque curve is pretty fat below the peak. What is surprising to everyone, though, is the way the power drops off precipitously on the other side of the 5,200 rpm peak. You'd think an engine with 4-cams and Yamaha-designed cylinder heads would be a revver. Of course, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics and these dyno results are sure to kick up some debate. What still remains to be seen is how the entire package works when pitted against its bogeyed competition. For that, we must still wait. <br /><br />[Source: Automobile, photo: Automobile]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/25/pull-my-dyno-automobile-puts-the-is-f-on-the-rollers/">Pull my dyno - Automobile puts the IS-F on the rollers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/lexus/0710_2008_lexus_is-f_dyno_chart>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/25/pull-my-dyno-automobile-puts-the-is-f-on-the-rollers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1021349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/25/pull-my-dyno-automobile-puts-the-is-f-on-the-rollers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobile</category><category>Automobile Magazine</category><category>AutomobileMagazine</category><category>dynamometer</category><category>dyno</category><category>dynojet</category><category>horsepower</category><category>IS-F</category><category>Lexus</category><category>Lexus IS-F</category><category>lexus is-f dyno</category><category>LexusIs-f</category><category>LexusIs-fDyno</category><category>magazine</category><category>torque</category><category>torque curve</category><category>TorqueCurve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shhhh! Audi RS6 may produce more than 600 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/29/shhhh-audi-rs6-may-produce-more-than-600-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/29/shhhh-audi-rs6-may-produce-more-than-600-hp/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/29/shhhh-audi-rs6-may-produce-more-than-600-hp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a></p><a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/cars/audi/audis-rs6-will-get-more-than-571hp/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/audi_s6_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a>At one time Japanese regulations prohibited engines in that country producing more than 274hp, and oddly enough a wide array of different engines were all rated at that same level. Given the actual performance of the cars, it was clear that many manufacturers were sandbagging. Audi appears set to do the same with its uber-powerful RS6. The twin-turbo V10 is expected to carry an <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/26/audi-rs6-making-561-hp/">official rating of 571 hp</a>, but the actual output could be as high as 610hp. Does anyone actually need this much power in a sedan or wagon? Of course not, but sign us up anyway.<br /><br />[Source: Motor Authority]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/29/shhhh-audi-rs6-may-produce-more-than-600-hp/">Shhhh! Audi RS6 may produce more than 600 HP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/cars/audi/audis-rs6-will-get-more-than-571hp/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/29/shhhh-audi-rs6-may-produce-more-than-600-hp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/975866/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/29/shhhh-audi-rs6-may-produce-more-than-600-hp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>audi</category><category>audi rs6</category><category>AudiRs6</category><category>engine</category><category>horsepower</category><category>power</category><category>rs6</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Audi RS6 making 571 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/26/audi-rs6-making-561-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/26/audi-rs6-making-561-hp/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/26/audi-rs6-making-561-hp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a></p><a href="http://www.automotorsport.se/nyhetsmall.asp?version=54677"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/audi_s6.jpg" /></a><br /><br />"Thanks God for traction control," was the first thought that ran through our minds when we came across the reported power figures of the new Audi RS6. Floating around the tubes of the Internets are the chassis codes for the new RS6, which look something like this: Audi AG 47 7967 21 AAJ N31 N30 579 426 5002. What does all that mean? Well, the 579 figure is the metric horsepower rating, which is equivalent to about 571 HP, while 426 refers to the kilowatts, and 5002 is a reference to the cubic centimeters of displacement.<br /><br />According to <em>Auto Motor und Sport</em>, purveyors of only the finest rumors, over 730 lb.-ft. of torque will be sent to all four wheels via a six-speed ZF automatic gearbox, with the possibility of a DSG transmission later on. In order to tame all those units of energy, carbon ceramic disks will be an option over the standard rotors - a good call if you ask us.<br /><br />Beyond the jaw-dropping potential of the 'standard' RS6, the German rag also reports that a 'Plus' version may become available with additional power - somewhere in the neighborhood of 620 to 625 HP - with the twin-turbo'd mill potentially finding a home within the RS R8.<br /><br />[Source: Auto Motor und Sport via <a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/sedans/new-audi-rs6-to-have-571hp/">Motor Authority</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/26/audi-rs6-making-561-hp/">Audi RS6 making 571 HP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.automotorsport.se/nyhetsmall.asp?version=54677>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/26/audi-rs6-making-561-hp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/925916/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/26/audi-rs6-making-561-hp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>571</category><category>audi</category><category>horsepower</category><category>hp</category><category>power</category><category>r8</category><category>rs</category><category>rs6</category><category>spy shots</category><category>SpyShots</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[White Fang: Novitec's 656-hp F430 Evoluzione]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/white-fang-novitecs-656-hp-f430-evoluzione/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/white-fang-novitecs-656-hp-f430-evoluzione/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/white-fang-novitecs-656-hp-f430-evoluzione/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ferrari/" rel="tag">Ferrari</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/novitec-f430-evo/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/carscoop_novitec_f430_450.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Nobody defines the terms "wretched excess" and "gilding the lily" quite like Novitec. Whereas countless other aftermarket tuners make their mark by transforming ordinary road cars into fire-breathing monsters, Novitec starts with the already-hottest-performing cars to grace black asphalt and then endeavors to improve upon them. In this case, the German tuning house is improving upon its own improvements with the Novitec Rosso Ferrari F430 Bi-Compressor Evoluzione.</p>
<p>"Evoluzione" is the magic word in both the Ferrari and Novitec houses, denoting the ludicrous taken to the extreme. (Think of insane examples like the Ferrari 288 GTO Evoluzione and you're on the right track.) In this case, the latest release from Novitec Rosso starts with their <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/30/novitec-rossos-twin-supercharger-ferrari-f430/">previous twin-supercharged 636-horsepower F430</a> and raises the stakes by an additional 20 horses, bringing total output up to an Enzo-rivaling 656hp. </p>
<p>In addition to the power spike - resulting from the twin Rotrex superchargers, intercoolers and remapped ECU - Novitec arms its monstrous creation with a full aerodynamic package, wheel and tire upgrade, bigger brakes, beefed-up suspension and the works. If you're the kind of customer who'd be interested in improving upon a Ferrari in the first place, chances are you'd likely be up for re-doing the interior, and Novitec offers a full range of custom leather retrofits that will turn the rare into the positively unique.</p>
<p>Want more? We've got the technical specs after the jump, and a batch of images in the gallery below.</p>
<p>[Source: Novitec via Carscoop]<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/novitec-f430-evo/low/">Novitec F430 Evo</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/novitec-f430-evo/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/carscoop_novitec_f430_4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/novitec-f430-evo/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/carscoop_novitec_f430_5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/novitec-f430-evo/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/carscoop_novitec_f430_3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/novitec-f430-evo/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/carscoop_novitec_f430_2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/novitec-f430-evo/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/carscoop_novitec_f430_1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/white-fang-novitecs-656-hp-f430-evoluzione/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>White Fang: Novitec's 656-hp F430 Evoluzione</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/white-fang-novitecs-656-hp-f430-evoluzione/">White Fang: Novitec's 656-hp F430 Evoluzione</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2007/04/2008-novitec-ferrari-f430-bi-compressor.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/white-fang-novitecs-656-hp-f430-evoluzione/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/874820/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/white-fang-novitecs-656-hp-f430-evoluzione/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>430</category><category>656</category><category>bi</category><category>compressor</category><category>ferrari</category><category>horsepower</category><category>kompressor</category><category>novitec</category><category>rosso</category><category>supercharged</category><category>supercharger</category><category>twin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: Ferrari F40, the dyno-saur of supercars]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/25/video-ferrari-f40-the-dyno-saur-of-supercars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/25/video-ferrari-f40-the-dyno-saur-of-supercars/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/25/video-ferrari-f40-the-dyno-saur-of-supercars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ferrari/" rel="tag">Ferrari</a></p><p><a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/videos/video-modified-ferrari-f40-on-a-dyno/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/f40-dyno-screenshot.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Coming up on nearly twenty years old now, some would be mistaken to consider the legendary Ferrari F40 a bit of a dino - not because it was part of the series named after Enzo's dear departed son, rather because, as far as supercars go, the F40 seems is a bit of a relic, dating back to an age before modern developments like electronic stability control and paddle-shifted transmissions roamed the earth. And yet the F40 can still thoroughly devour almost anything and everything on the road today. What better way, then, to take in the brutal monstrosity of the dinosaur that is the Ferrari F40 than spooling up its turbos on a dyno. Better not let it loose....</p>
<p>This video, which has been floating around the internet, was shot after an F40 was fitted with a custom Tubi exhaust. Check it out after the jump.</p>
<p>[Source: Motor Authority]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/25/video-ferrari-f40-the-dyno-saur-of-supercars/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIDEO: Ferrari F40, the dyno-saur of supercars</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/25/video-ferrari-f40-the-dyno-saur-of-supercars/">VIDEO: Ferrari F40, the dyno-saur of supercars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/news/videos/video-modified-ferrari-f40-on-a-dyno/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/25/video-ferrari-f40-the-dyno-saur-of-supercars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/859671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/25/video-ferrari-f40-the-dyno-saur-of-supercars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>custom</category><category>dyno</category><category>dynomameter</category><category>dynometer</category><category>exhaust</category><category>f40</category><category>ferrari</category><category>horsepower</category><category>road</category><category>rolling</category><category>test</category><category>tubi</category><category>video</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Screw You, Top Gear! - Kenne Bell pumps up the GT500]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/screw-you-top-gear-kenne-bell-pumps-up-the-gt500/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/screw-you-top-gear-kenne-bell-pumps-up-the-gt500/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/screw-you-top-gear-kenne-bell-pumps-up-the-gt500/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><em><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/kenne-bell-shelby-gt500/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/kennebell17.jpg" /></a><br />click the image above for the gallery</em><br /><br />Here's Top Gear's cure for their <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/">idiot dyno test</a> that proved nothing. As much as we love Top Gear, their derision of the GT500 for producing a "mere" 447 horespower on a chassis dyno is pure BS. A 10-percent loss through the drivetrain is stellar, yet the spin from our snarky British friends was that it was somehow subpar. Kenne Bell has the antidote, and it's available in several stages of tune, from streetable to antisocial. <br /><br />Since the GT500 is factory-equipped with a supercharger, the engine internals have been beefed up for boost, and a water to air intercooler is in place. The Kenne Bell system replaces the stock Eaton blower with its trademark Twin Screw system. The throttle body is also upsized to 75 millimeters versus the stock 60, but the rest of the intake tract remains stock. Rounding out the Stage 1 tuning is an ECU flash, and the end result is 606 horsepower at the rear wheels. Take that, Hamster and Clarkson! Changing out a few other intake components and fiddling with the drive pulley's diameter will net you Stage 2 or 3 tuning, delivering up to 692 horsepower on the rollers. Maybe this kit will serve to quiet some of the carping from the Top Gear pundits, but we think they just don't understand muscle cars. It's a different flavor of performance, that's for sure, and the Kenne Bell upgrades add even more spice.<br /><br />Thanks for the tip, Drew<br /><br />[Source: Mustang Life]<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/kenne-bell-shelby-gt500/low/">Kenne Bell Shelby GT500</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/kenne-bell-shelby-gt500/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/kennebell_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/kenne-bell-shelby-gt500/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/kennebell10_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/kenne-bell-shelby-gt500/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/kennebell11_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/kenne-bell-shelby-gt500/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/kennebell12_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/kenne-bell-shelby-gt500/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/kennebell13_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/screw-you-top-gear-kenne-bell-pumps-up-the-gt500/">Screw You, Top Gear! - Kenne Bell pumps up the GT500</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://mustanglife.tenmagazines.com/articles.asp?page=tenarticle&amp;aid=3308>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/screw-you-top-gear-kenne-bell-pumps-up-the-gt500/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/848119/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/screw-you-top-gear-kenne-bell-pumps-up-the-gt500/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dyno test</category><category>DynoTest</category><category>ford</category><category>gt</category><category>gt 500</category><category>Gt500</category><category>high performance</category><category>HighPerformance</category><category>horsepower</category><category>increase</category><category>kit</category><category>mustang</category><category>performane</category><category>shelby</category><category>stage 1</category><category>stage 2</category><category>stage 3</category><category>Stage1</category><category>Stage2</category><category>Stage3</category><category>supercharger</category><category>top gear</category><category>TopGear</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP 101: Top Gear provides false info on GT500 horsepower rating]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.speedsportlife.com/2007/03/05/a-sad-state-of-affairs-top-gear-lies-about-gt500-hp-rating/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/hammondgt500.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"> <script> var digg_url = 'http://digg.com/hardware/Horsepower_101_Top_Gear_provides_false_info_on_GT500_horsepower_rating'; </script> <script src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>Someone help us understand what's going on here. In the latest episode of Top Gear, Richard Hammon revisits the Ford Shelby GT500 that the British motoring show tested late last year. For comparison's sake, Hammond brings along his own classic Shelby GT390. We're used to Top Gear bashing our U.S. ware at every opportunity, and the GT500 again takes a licking for having a suspension that can't handle the car's power. But when Hammond wheels out a portable chassis dyno to accurately measure the GT500's horsepower, he seems surprised to learn that the car produces 447 horsepower. Of course, that's 447 <em>wheel</em> horsepower, meaning the horsepower is being measured at the wheel where parasitic drivetrain losses are in effect and reduce the manufacturer's <em>flywheel</em> horsepower rating a good 10 to 20%. In fact, if you factor in a 10% drivetrain loss on Ford's flywheel horsepower rating of 500, you get 450 wheel horsepower, which is pretty darn close to the 447 achieved by Hammond's "rolling road". For some inexplicable reason, however, Hammond and his comparitavely giant co-host, Jeremy Clarkson, ding the GT500 for producing 53 less horsepower than advertised. Huh?<br /><br />You can view the segment after the jump for the time being (until it gets yanked off YouTube) and make your own judgment, but from our perspective the segment appears highly misleading to viewers who don't know the difference between horsepower ratings at the wheel and the flywheel. What's up, Hamster?<br /><br />[Source: Dubspeed Driven]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HP 101: Top Gear provides false info on GT500 horsepower rating</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/">HP 101: Top Gear provides false info on GT500 horsepower rating</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.speedsportlife.com/2007/03/05/a-sad-state-of-affairs-top-gear-lies-about-gt500-hp-rating/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/846070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/hp-101-top-gear-provides-false-info-on-gt500-horsepower-rating/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chassis dyno</category><category>ChassisDyno</category><category>dyno</category><category>flywheel horsepower</category><category>FlywheelHorsepower</category><category>gt500</category><category>horsepower</category><category>jeremy clarkson</category><category>JeremyClarkson</category><category>richard hammond</category><category>RichardHammond</category><category>top gear</category><category>TopGear</category><category>wheel horsepower</category><category>WheelHorsepower</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Macpherson struts her stuff: Elle gets a Fiat Panda]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/06/macpherson-struts-her-stuff-elle-gets-a-fiat-panda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/06/macpherson-struts-her-stuff-elle-gets-a-fiat-panda/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/06/macpherson-struts-her-stuff-elle-gets-a-fiat-panda/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/misc-auto-shows/" rel="tag">Misc. Auto Shows</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/macpherson_panda.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" /></p>
<p>We just love it when cars and models collide (figuratively, not literally... that'd be tragic). It's convergence at its finest. Like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/27/british-supermodel-jodie-kidd-challenges-you-to-a-race/">Jodie Kidd who races Maseratis</a>, supermodel Elle Macpherson also loves Italian cars, albeit slightly smaller ones. Elle became the first owner of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/11/paris-preview-first-photo-of-fiat-panda-sport/">new Fiat Panda 100HP</a> when the new suped-up ultra-teeny-tiny-supermini made its British debut at the MPH '06 show this past Thursday. </p>
<p>While 100 horsepower may not sound like much, considering the Panda's Lilliputian dimensions, it's nothing to sneeze at (especially among the car's asthmatic competition). The Panda is a little over three-and-a-half meters long, one-and-a-half meters each wide and tall, and weights less than one ton, so 100 horses are all it takes to get it to sixty in 9.5 seconds. It tops out at 115 mph while returning 43.4 mpg on the combined cycle. Fiat's Abarth performance division also gave the Panda 100HP disc brakes all around (vented up front) , as well as an upgraded suspension, with some visual enhancements to go with the extra performance kit.</p>
<p>We just wish this cute model were available and in the US. (The Panda too, for that matter.)</p>
<p>[Source: Fiat UK]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/06/macpherson-struts-her-stuff-elle-gets-a-fiat-panda/">Macpherson struts her stuff: Elle gets a Fiat Panda</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/06/macpherson-struts-her-stuff-elle-gets-a-fiat-panda/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/696537/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/06/macpherson-struts-her-stuff-elle-gets-a-fiat-panda/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>100</category><category>elle</category><category>fiat</category><category>horsepower</category><category>hp</category><category>macpherson</category><category>mph</category><category>panda</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW 335i dyno numbers - round two]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/22/bmw-335i-dyno-numbers-round-two/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/22/bmw-335i-dyno-numbers-round-two/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/22/bmw-335i-dyno-numbers-round-two/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.automobilemag.com/features/news/0609_2007_bmw_335i_dyno_revised/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/bmw-335i-engine-(resized-250).jpg" /></a>Last month, Automobile Mag generated some chassis dyno numbers with a turbocharged BMW 335i coupe that were <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/bmw-335i-lays-down-fat-dyno-numbers/">a bit healthier</a> than one would suspect, given the factory's rating of 300 HP at the crankshaft. In a follow-up, they're now stating that the 275 rear-wheel horsepower number that was reported was actually the <em>lowest </em>of four pulls; one even generated 283 ponies. And all of this was with 92 F ambient temps - the sort of air that usually kills the output of boosted engines. <br /><br />The publication then strapped a second sample to the same dyno, but this time in 78 F weather. Three runs yielded an average of 285 RWHP, with the other two varying from that by a maximum of three HP. Such consistency in the static air environment of a dyno is downright amazing and attests to the effectiveness of the Bimmer's intercooler and engine management system. <br /><br />[Source: Automobile Mag]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/22/bmw-335i-dyno-numbers-round-two/">BMW 335i dyno numbers - round two</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.automobilemag.com/features/news/0609_2007_bmw_335i_dyno_revised/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/22/bmw-335i-dyno-numbers-round-two/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/673154/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/22/bmw-335i-dyno-numbers-round-two/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>335i</category><category>BMW</category><category>direct injection</category><category>DirectInjection</category><category>dyno</category><category>dynometer</category><category>horsepower</category><category>rear wheel</category><category>turbo</category><category>turbocharged</category><category>twin turbo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bahn-stormer Special: Mercedes-Benz CL63 AMG unveiled]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/13/bahn-stormer-special-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/13/bahn-stormer-special-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/13/bahn-stormer-special-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a></p><p> </p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">UPDATED</span><br /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/106949606c3777_018.jpg"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/106949606c3777_018_450.jpg" id="vimage_11" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">click on image to enlarge</span></p>
<p>More details are surfacing from Mercedes-Benz on the latest car in its fleet to get AMG's new purpose-built 6.3-liter V8, following the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/24/first-photo-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/">first image</a> we featured in July. Based on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/22/official-mercedes-benz-cl-coupe-pics-pop-up/">recently updated CL-Class</a> - the grand touring coupe itself based on the S-Class sedan - the CL63 AMG sweetens the deal with 525 hp, capable of propelling this leather-lined cruise missile to sixty in 4.6 seconds on its way to an electronically-limited top speed of 155 mph (a Mercedes standard).</p>
<p>In addition to the fire-snorting engine upgrade, the CL63 gets a full aero package (even more aggressive than the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/14/mercedes-benz-cl-class-amg-sport-package-officially-announced/">AMG Sport Package</a> offered on the "standard" CL) and suspension upgrades, as well as the full host of Mercedes' electronic systems. A close-up shot of the wheels shows a monstrous brake package, while a shot of the rear seems to show an aerodynamic diffuser to minimize lift without the need for an ostentatious rear wing (there's a reason they call it a "spoiler").</p>
<p>No word yet on pricing, but the old axiom applies: if you have to ask, you can't afford it.</p>
<p>(Full high-resolution gallery and press release after the jump)</p>
<p>[Source: Mercedes-Benz]</p>
<p>UPDATE: Added full high resolution gallery and press release<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/13/bahn-stormer-special-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bahn-stormer Special: Mercedes-Benz CL63 AMG unveiled</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/13/bahn-stormer-special-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/">Bahn-stormer Special: Mercedes-Benz CL63 AMG unveiled</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2006/09/paris-show-2007-mercedes-cl-63-amg-525.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/13/bahn-stormer-special-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/668138/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/13/bahn-stormer-special-mercedes-benz-cl63-amg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>500</category><category>amg</category><category>autobahn</category><category>benz</category><category>cl</category><category>cl63</category><category>cl63 amg</category><category>Cl63Amg</category><category>coupe</category><category>gt</category><category>horsepower</category><category>mercedes</category><category>mercedes-benz</category><category>touring</category><category>v8</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW 335i lays down fat dyno numbers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/bmw-335i-lays-down-fat-dyno-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/bmw-335i-lays-down-fat-dyno-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/bmw-335i-lays-down-fat-dyno-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><p><a href="http://www.automobilemag.com/features/news/0609_2007_bmw_335i_dynamometer/"><img border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/p0029991a.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>BMW's turbocharged 335i is rated by the manufacturer at 300 HP and 300 lb-ft of torque at the crankshaft, which seemed a bit low to us considering the 255 HP rating of its naturally-aspirated brethren. Sure, the turbo system was designed to maximize the usable powerband instead of creating moonshot-like peak power, but a mere 17% bump in the power ratings just didn't compute. </p>
<p>Investigating the matter further, Automobile Magazine strapped down a 335i to a Dynojet chassis dyno. Such a device measures power at the rear wheels, and translation into crankshaft numbers requires that one account for drivetrain losses. Taking into account the loss of 15% or thereabouts that we'd expect to see from a Dynojet run (don't get hung up trying to determine a precise "loss" number, because there is much more to it than just an estimation of friction), something in the neighborhood of 255 HP would be expected at the rear wheels from 300 HP at the crank - but that wasn't the case. The 335i instead laid down 276 HP, as well as spinning the rollers with 300 lb-ft of torque as measured at the rear wheels. That's about 37% healthier than the 330i. </p>
<p>So, what's up? Yes, the new SAE J1349 dyno standard is supposed to eliminate this sort of rating tomfoolery, but it's only accurate under one specified set of conditions. Dynometers, such as the Dynojet, attempt to correct the results back to a set of conditions, but they're slightly different than those used for J1349. That likely accounts for only a few percentage points of difference, though. More likely is that the Bimmer's engine management system, rather than simply establishing a limit for boost, is constantly attempting to maximize airflow while controlling detonation. Such a system cannot easily be corrected, and putting such a vehicle on a dyno under optimum conditions (usually with particularly cool ambient air temps) can yield results well in excess of the manufacturer's ratings, and this likely explains why the measured torque peak is disproportionate to the horsepower peak.</p>
<p>All this power - accessible at nearly any engine speed, judging by the broad torque curve - gives the 335i performance that nearly rivals that of the previous-gen M3, with the quarter-mile disappearing in 13.6 seconds and with a trap speed of 104 MPH. That sort of performance puts it in the running as Sleeper of the Year.</p>
<p>[Source: Automobile Magazine]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/bmw-335i-lays-down-fat-dyno-numbers/">BMW 335i lays down fat dyno numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.automobilemag.com/features/news/0609_2007_bmw_335i_dynamometer/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/bmw-335i-lays-down-fat-dyno-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/657274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/22/bmw-335i-lays-down-fat-dyno-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BMW, 335i, dyno, dynometer</category><category>Bmw,335i,Dyno,Dynometer</category><category>direct injection</category><category>engines</category><category>horsepower</category><category>peak</category><category>power</category><category>torque</category><category>turbo</category><category>turbocharging</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Weber looks to bring V4 engine to the masses]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/23/weber-looks-to-bring-v4-engine-to-the-masses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/23/weber-looks-to-bring-v4-engine-to-the-masses/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/23/weber-looks-to-bring-v4-engine-to-the-masses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autofieldguide.com/articles/040604.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/weber-v4.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></a>Weber Automotive, a leader in the manufacture of engine blocks and crankshafts (many of the magnesium VW Beetle engine blocks were cast by Weber), has designed a small V4 engine in an attempt to provide an alternative to inline fours in emerging markets such as China. </p>
<p>The V4 configuration has had its fair share of success in the realm of high-performance motorcycles, and Weber claims that its cube-like shape makes it well-suited to compact cars as well. Not only is the 70-degree bank angle said to offer a packaging advantage, but it's supposedly up to 75 lbs lighter than a typical 2.0L I4 of similar power. </p>
<p>Fans of the Yamaha VMax and Honda VFR may also be glad to hear that a 90-degree crank is used. This gives the engine a firing order that effectively is like two 90-degree V-twins which run 180 degrees out of phase, and thus leads to an exhaust noise that can best be described as that of a miniature V8. </p>
<p>The company has posted some <a href="http://www.weber-motor.com/de/produkte/mpe-v4/technische-daten/index.html">specifications</a> on its site, and if they are to be trusted, this engine might be rather interesting, indeed. If someone wants to toss this into a decent sport compact, we'd be more than happy to thrash it around for a while.</p>
<p>[Source: Automotive Design and Production]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/23/weber-looks-to-bring-v4-engine-to-the-masses/">Weber looks to bring V4 engine to the masses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autofieldguide.com/articles/040604.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/23/weber-looks-to-bring-v4-engine-to-the-masses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/646021/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/23/weber-looks-to-bring-v4-engine-to-the-masses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>engines</category><category>horsepower</category><category>powerplants</category><category>torque</category><category>v4</category><category>weber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>