<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Spy Shots: Next-gen Ford Ranger and Chevy Colorado replacements spotted in the U.S. - but where will they end up?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/28/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-and-chevy-colorado-replacements/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/28/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-and-chevy-colorado-replacements/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/28/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-and-chevy-colorado-replacements/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/spyphotos/" rel="tag">Spy Photos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-ford-t6-ranger/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/ranger.d2.kgp.ed-630op.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Ford T6 Ranger spy shots - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
The fate of small pickup trucks in America is rather shaky. There haven't been any major new entries into the segment as of late (save the <a href="http://autoblog.com/suzuki/equator">Suzuki Equator</a>, of course, even though it's not much more than a rebadged <a href="http://autoblog.com/nissan/frontier">Nissan Frontier</a>). And though we've spied <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/23/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-global-quad-cab-spotted/">Ford Ranger prototypes testing abroad</a>, it doesn't necessarily mean that a new model is slated for U.S. consumption. Small trucks do well in other markets, and the trucklets seem to be a dying trend here in the States.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-chevrolet-colorado/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" align="right" class="right border" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/01-colorado-spy-kgp-may-250op.jpg" /></a>Today, though, our spies have not only caught a new <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/ranger">Ranger</a> mule (above), but a small GM pickup (right) - the replacement for the aging <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/colorado">Chevrolet Colorado</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/canyon">GMC Canyon</a> twins. Both mules look a bit larger than the models currently on the road, though still more manageable than the top-dog <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/f-150">F-150</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Silverado</a>.<br />
<br />
Still, though, it's unclear what the future has in store for these new trucks. The fact that Ford and GM are testing these new mini-pickups in and around their respective headquarters in southeast Michigan leads us to believe that there may, in fact, be U.S.-spec replacements in the works. Ford has often spoke of a smaller F-100-style F-150 to replace the Ranger, and reports have shown that GM is <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/27/report-gm-working-on-new-small-truck/">working on a new truck</a> to hopefully rekindle the success that the original Chevy S10 and GMC Sonoma had. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-ford-t6-ranger">Spy Shots: 2012 Ford T6 Ranger</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-ford-t6-ranger/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/01-ranger-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-ford-t6-ranger/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/02-ranger-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-ford-t6-ranger/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/03-ranger-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-ford-t6-ranger/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/04-ranger-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-ford-t6-ranger/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/05-ranger-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-chevrolet-colorado">Spy Shots: 2012 Chevrolet Colorado</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/01-colorado-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/02-colorado-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-shots-2012-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/03-colorado-spy-kgp-may_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/28/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-and-chevy-colorado-replacements/">Spy Shots: Next-gen Ford Ranger and Chevy Colorado replacements spotted in the U.S. - but where will they end up?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 28 May 2010 16:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/28/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-and-chevy-colorado-replacements/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19496122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/28/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-and-chevy-colorado-replacements/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>canyon</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet colorado</category><category>ChevroletColorado</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy colorado</category><category>ChevyColorado</category><category>ford</category><category>Ford Ranger</category><category>FordRanger</category><category>GMC</category><category>gmc canyon</category><category>GmcCanyon</category><category>Ranger</category><category>spy photos</category><category>spy pics</category><category>spy shots</category><category>SpyPhotos</category><category>SpyPics</category><category>SpyShots</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:53:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19496122/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/05/28/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-and-chevy-colorado-replacements/19496122/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19496122</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/ranger.d2.kgp.ed-630op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: Bad Chinese parts force GM to idle Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon plant]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/18/report-bad-chinese-parts-force-gm-to-idle-chevy-colorado-gmc-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/18/report-bad-chinese-parts-force-gm-to-idle-chevy-colorado-gmc-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/18/report-bad-chinese-parts-force-gm-to-idle-chevy-colorado-gmc-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/2010chevroletcolorado-630-blau.jpg"  alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2010 Chevrolet Colorado - click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors">General Motors</a>' Shreveport, Louisiana plant has apparently been hit with another bit of bad news out of China. Shreveport's KSLA TV is reporting that a batch of contaminated microchips from China will halt production at the plant the week of April 19. Not only that, the chip issue is also expected to impair <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/canyon">GMC Canyon</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/colorado">Chevy Colorado</a> production in Europe and at the Ramos Arizpe plant in Mexico.<br />
<br />
A supplier in North Carolina provides brake control modules for the trucks, and that supplier gets chips for the modules from a supplier in China. It was the North Carolina company that <a href="http://www.motobullet.com/news.php?id=10208">informed GM of the contaminated parts</a>. Even when Hummer had a chance of continuing, Shreveport was <a href="http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=10587522">headed for closure</a> and "bad asset" status, but this news doesn't help.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado">2010 Chevrolet Colorado</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado000_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=12319616">KSLA TV</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/18/report-bad-chinese-parts-force-gm-to-idle-chevy-colorado-gmc-ca/">Report: Bad Chinese parts force GM to idle Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon plant</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=12319616>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/18/report-bad-chinese-parts-force-gm-to-idle-chevy-colorado-gmc-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19444121/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/18/report-bad-chinese-parts-force-gm-to-idle-chevy-colorado-gmc-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevrolet colorado</category><category>ChevroletColorado</category><category>chevy</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gmc canyon</category><category>GmcCanyon</category><category>louisiana</category><category>shreveport</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:03:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19444121/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/04/18/report-bad-chinese-parts-force-gm-to-idle-chevy-colorado-gmc-ca/19444121/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19444121</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/2010chevroletcolorado-630-blau_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: GM may euthanize Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon small pickups]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-gm-may-euthanize-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-small-pickups/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-gm-may-euthanize-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-small-pickups/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-gm-may-euthanize-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-small-pickups/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcoloradoopt.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2010 Chevrolet Colorado - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
The future of the small pickup truck market in the United States doesn't look good. A new global Ford Ranger <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/23/spy-shots-next-gen-ford-ranger-global-quad-cab-spotted/">is in the works</a>, though we have good reason to doubt that will replace the model currently available in North America. For its part, Chrysler has plans to nix the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/dakota">Dodge Dakota</a> next year, and new reports suggest that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/colorado">Chevrolet Colorado</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/canyon">GMC Canyon</a> twins may have their plugs pulled, as well.<br />
<br />
In speaking with General Motors vice chairmain Bob Lutz, <a href="http://www.pickuptrucks.com">PickupTrucks.com</a> asked about plans to kill off the two models, with Lutz responding, "It's uncertain at this point...They may well [go away]."<br />
<br />
GM has not announced any official plans to update or kill off the Colorado and Canyon, but we won't be surprised if these two dated models meet that Great Car Crusher in the sky over the next couple of years.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado">2010 Chevrolet Colorado</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado000_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-colorado/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcolorado004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/02/gms-small-trucks-could-follow-ranger-and-dakota-exits.html">PickupTrucks.com</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-gm-may-euthanize-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-small-pickups/">Report: GM may euthanize Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon small pickups</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/02/gms-small-trucks-could-follow-ranger-and-dakota-exits.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-gm-may-euthanize-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-small-pickups/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19371547/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-gm-may-euthanize-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-small-pickups/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>canyon</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet colorado</category><category>ChevroletColorado</category><category>colorado</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>GMC</category><category>gmc canyon</category><category>GmcCanyon</category><category>Pickup</category><category>pickup truck</category><category>PickupTruck</category><category>truck</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19371547/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/02/24/report-gm-may-euthanize-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-small-pickups/19371547/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19371547</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/2010chevroletcoloradoopt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM considering selling medium truck operations to Isuzu]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/gm-considering-selling-medium-truck-operations-to-isuzu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/gm-considering-selling-medium-truck-operations-to-isuzu/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/gm-considering-selling-medium-truck-operations-to-isuzu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/isuzu/" rel="tag">Isuzu</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/topstories/feeds/reuters/2008/09/19/2008-09-19T090732Z_01_T115813_RTRIDST_0_GM-ISUZU-UPDATE-2.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/2008.i370.action.1_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Reports are coming in that the General is considering selling its medium truck operations to Isuzu. This news is totally unconfirmed by both parties, though Isuzu says it would be more than willing to listen if GM felt the desire to talk.<br /><br />All of this comes shortly after Navistar chose <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/20/navistar-i-not-i-going-to-buy-gms-medium-duty-truck-business/">not to follow through</a> on its non-binding agreement to purchase the commercial truck unit from General Motors after seeing what's been happening with the U.S. economy and gas prices. After that deal went sour, GM said that it would continue looking for options, so this particular piece of the rumormill pie is anything but surprising. We contacted GM to see if the automaker had anything to say regarding the hubbub, and, as expected, it's staying tight-lipped for the time being. An Isuzu tie-up makes some sense, as the two truck makers have had <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/general-motors-and-isuzu-to-build-pickups-together/">dealings together</a> in the past, most notably in the design of GM's current mid-sized trucks, the Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/topstories/feeds/reuters/2008/09/19/2008-09-19T090732Z_01_T115813_RTRIDST_0_GM-ISUZU-UPDATE-2.html">Forbes</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/gm-considering-selling-medium-truck-operations-to-isuzu/">GM considering selling medium truck operations to Isuzu</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/topstories/feeds/reuters/2008/09/19/2008-09-19T090732Z_01_T115813_RTRIDST_0_GM-ISUZU-UPDATE-2.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/gm-considering-selling-medium-truck-operations-to-isuzu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1319068/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/gm-considering-selling-medium-truck-operations-to-isuzu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevrolet colorado</category><category>ChevroletColorado</category><category>chevy colorado</category><category>chevy kodiak</category><category>ChevyColorado</category><category>ChevyKodiak</category><category>gm medium duty trucks</category><category>gmc canyon</category><category>gmc topkick</category><category>GmcCanyon</category><category>GmcTopkick</category><category>GmMediumDutyTrucks</category><category>isuzu</category><category>isuzu trucks</category><category>IsuzuTrucks</category><category>mid size trucks</category><category>mid-size trucks</category><category>Mid-sizeTrucks</category><category>midsize trucks</category><category>MidsizeTrucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1319068/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/09/19/gm-considering-selling-medium-truck-operations-to-isuzu/1319068/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1319068</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/2008.i370.action.1_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[It's official: GMC Canyon V8 option confirmed]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/its-official-gmc-canyon-v8-option-confirmed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/its-official-gmc-canyon-v8-option-confirmed/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/its-official-gmc-canyon-v8-option-confirmed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/news/gm/gmc/canyon/v8official.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/08_gmccanyonslt.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Well, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/07/v8-for-08-chevy-colorado-engine-lineup-expanding/">the rumor</a> came true. Mike Levine at <a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/news/gm/gmc/canyon/v8official.html">Pickuptruck.com</a> noticed that at the website for the '08 GMC Canyon, a <a href="http://www.gmc.com/canyon/canyon/specsStandard.jsp">V8 engine is listed as an option</a> coming in early 2008. Mike called up the General and got confirmation that yes, a V8 is indeed coming for both 2WD and 4WD versions of the midsize pickup. They wouldn't confirm <em>which </em>V8 the Canyon's getting, but since that platform's already been modified to accommodate the 5.3L unit for the HUMMER H3 Alpha, it's likely to be the same one. Considering that the 5.3 does just fine in the much larger Sierra, it ought to be a hoot in the Canyon. GM hasn't put up a web page for the '08 Chevy Colorado yet, but we have to believe that whatever Canyon gets, Colorado will, too. <br /><br />[Source: PickupTruck.com]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/its-official-gmc-canyon-v8-option-confirmed/">It's official: GMC Canyon V8 option confirmed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/news/gm/gmc/canyon/v8official.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/its-official-gmc-canyon-v8-option-confirmed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/990109/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/its-official-gmc-canyon-v8-option-confirmed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>08 canyon</category><category>08 gmc canyon</category><category>08Canyon</category><category>08GmcCanyon</category><category>2008 gmc canyon</category><category>2008 gmc canyon v8</category><category>2008GmcCanyon</category><category>2008GmcCanyonV8</category><category>breaking</category><category>gmc</category><category>gmc canyon</category><category>gmc canyon v8</category><category>GmcCanyon</category><category>GmcCanyonV8</category><category>v8</category><category>v8 confirmed for gmc canyon</category><category>v8 for 08</category><category>V8ConfirmedForGmcCanyon</category><category>V8For08</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:55:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/990109/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/09/14/its-official-gmc-canyon-v8-option-confirmed/990109/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>990109</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/08_gmccanyonslt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[You can get a "Tough Box" for your Chevy Colorado, too!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/09/you-can-get-a-tough-box-for-your-chevy-colorado-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/09/you-can-get-a-tough-box-for-your-chevy-colorado-too/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/09/you-can-get-a-tough-box-for-your-chevy-colorado-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.svefleet.com/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/midbox_storage_page_1_image_0001a.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/midbox_storage_page_1_image_0001b.jpg"  alt="" />It has been confirmed that Ford will be offering the "<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/09/update-ford-tough-box-available-to-commercial-customers-this/">Tough Box</a>" as an option on the F-150 as soon as this Spring, but what if you're not in the market for a Blue Oval with a bed? Don't worry, since it seems that there are companies perfectly willing to apply the same treatment to your General Motors pickup, specifically the Chevy Colorado / GMC Canyon. <a href="http://www.svefleet.com/">SVE Fleet</a> is a company that will add what it calls a Mid-Box to your pickup. Essentially the same thing as Ford's "Tough Box", the Mid-Box features two hinged doors at the leading edge of the bed that open up to reveal a deep storage space or slide out drawers that can store tools. In fact, SVE Fleet can even add a Mid-Box to an F-150 if you really can't wait for the "Tough Box" to become available when the snow thaws.<br /><br />Speaking of the "Tough Box", thanks to Mike Levine at <a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2009/ford/f150/spied/mule1.html">Pickuptruck.com</a>, we've learned a few more details on Ford's newest feature for the F-150. The Blue Oval has tapped 2nd stage manufacturer <a href="http://www.decoma.com/">Decoma International</a> to build the "Tough Box" option into existing F-150s that are shipped to them from the factory with a short bed on a long wheelbase. The "Tough Box" can also be outfitted in many ways for either storage of larger items or with slide-out trays for smaller tools. Rumor has it that the "Tough Box" came into being from a request by the fertilizer company that produces Scott's Miracle-Gro. Federal regulations demand they keep solid and liquid fertilizers separated during transport, so they were faced with either driving two separate trucks or finding one with separated compartments. In its quest to keep the F-150 atop the sales chart, Ford stepped up with a factory-backed solution.<br /><br />[Source: SVE Fleet via <a href="http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/showthread.php?p=969467#post969467">GMInsideNews</a>, <a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2009/ford/f150/spied/mule1.html">Pickuptruck.com</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/09/you-can-get-a-tough-box-for-your-chevy-colorado-too/">You can get a "Tough Box" for your Chevy Colorado, too!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.svefleet.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/09/you-can-get-a-tough-box-for-your-chevy-colorado-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/849491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/09/you-can-get-a-tough-box-for-your-chevy-colorado-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Canyon</category><category>Chevy Colorado</category><category>ChevyColorado</category><category>Colorado</category><category>F-150</category><category>GMC Canyon</category><category>GmcCanyon</category><category>Mid-Box</category><category>SVE Fleet</category><category>SveFleet</category><category>Tough Box</category><category>ToughBox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/849491/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/03/09/you-can-get-a-tough-box-for-your-chevy-colorado-too/849491/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>849491</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/midbox_storage_page_1_image_0001a_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Bigger motors mean more power for 2007 HUMMER, Colorado/Canyon]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hummer/" rel="tag">Hummer</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/x06hm_h3028.jpg" id="vimage_2" alt="" /><br /></p>
<p><br />The HUMMER H3, Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon will benefit from more displacement this fall when General Motors rolls out the 2007 models. GM's new <!--StartFragment --><font size="2" face="Arial">Vortec 2.9L inline-four and Vortec 3.7L inline-five, which produce&nbsp;10 and 22 more hp and 10 and 17 additional lb.-ft of torque, respectively, are given more displacement by bored-out intake and exhaust valves, variable valve timing, an upgraded camshaft, and other changes. In the case of the 3.7L inline-five, a larger and more refined catalytic converter helps it meet new BIN 5 emissions requirements, as well.</font></p>
<p><font size="2">Full release after the jump.</font></p>
<p><font size="2">[Source: General Motors]</font></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bigger motors mean more power for 2007 HUMMER, Colorado/Canyon</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/">Bigger motors mean more power for 2007 HUMMER, Colorado/Canyon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/634941/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevy colorado</category><category>ChevyColorado</category><category>gmc canyon</category><category>GmcCanyon</category><category>hummer</category><category>mid-size pickup</category><category>Mid-sizePickup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:05:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/634941/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/06/20/bigger-motors-mean-more-power-for-2007-hummer-colorado-canyon/634941/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>634941</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/x06hm_h3028_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>