<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Does Washington's GMAC bailout hurt Ford?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123085986972148021.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/gmac_bhs2.jpg" alt="" /></a>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> puts forth the case that the government's $5 billion lifeline to GMAC has given GMAC a competitive advantage compared to its rivals. After the taxpayer cash was received, GMAC <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/30/gmac-opens-up-financing-rules-after-6-billion-fed-loan/">dropped the required credit score</a> to get a loan and began offering 0% financing on several models, and rates from about 1% to 6% on a host of others. While doing so, it admitted that "without this [loan] . . . we would not be able to do this today."<br /> <br /> The Journal cries foul, saying that because GMAC is essentially doing this with -- or at least, because of -- government money, "the feds have now put the muscle of the state behind one company's products." The Journal also considers that the government might do what it can to make sure the horses it bet on win the race, saying "the Washington temptation will be to take other steps to help the two companies gain market share at the expense of their private competitors."<br /> <br /> As to the issue of granting the loan to GMAC at all, the government didn't have much choice unless it wanted its previous investment in GM to potentially get flushed by a GMAC bankruptcy. As to 0% fiancing, it's being offered on SUVs and Saabs, none of which are making the cash register overheat. A quick comparison between financing in Southern California through GMAC or Ford Credit found similar rates on other cars: the 2009 Malibu gets 4.9% APR, the same as the 2009 Ford Taurus SEL AWD. <br /> <br /> Will the government try to otherwise help GM and Chrysler (beyond pushing more money their way)? The airlines got $15 billion after 9/11, yet would anyone accuse the government of otherwise aiding the industry? As to intervention in the free market... well, when was the last time the market was truly free? And Does GMAC's ability to offer the new incentives give it a competitive advantage over the other companies? It only lasted until January 5th, and some <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090103/AUTO01/901030346&amp;imw=Y">GM dealers did say they were moving metal</a> -- but if the benefit really was that lopsided, we're sure those competitors will let us know about it soon enough.<br /> <br /> [Source: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123085986972148021.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Wall Street Journal</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does Washington's GMAC bailout hurt Ford?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/">Does Washington's GMAC bailout hurt Ford?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123085986972148021.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1418100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry bailout</category><category>AutoIndustryBailout</category><category>bank bailout</category><category>BankBailout</category><category>car buying</category><category>CarBuying</category><category>financial</category><category>financials</category><category>financing</category><category>ford credit</category><category>FordCredit</category><category>gmac</category><category>gmac loan</category><category>GmacLoan</category><category>government</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1418100/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/1418100/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1418100</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/gmac_bhs2_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
