<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalling 2013 Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac SRX over transmission software]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-cadillac-srx-new-york-2012/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/2013-cadillac-srx-ny.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued recalls for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/lacrosse/">2013 Buick LaCrosse</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/srx/">2013 Cadillac SRX</a> due to a problem with the software for the transmission controller. On about 27,000 SRX and LaCrosse models, the transmission could accidentally be shifted to Sport mode, which would reduce the amount of engine braking drivers experience.<br />
<br />
NHTSA says this could increase the risk of a crash, but, fortunately, the required fix is simply an update to the software.<br />
<br />
While we're on the subject of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> vehicle recalls, a small number (48) of compressed natural gas versions of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/express/">2011 Chevrolet Express</a> are also being recalled for a potential risk of fire or explosion. Yikes. Both official recall notices are posted <a href="/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalling 2013 Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac SRX over transmission software</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/">GM recalling 2013 Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac SRX over transmission software</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20512010/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 chevy express</category><category>2013 buick lacrosse</category><category>2013 cadillac srx</category><category>buick</category><category>buick lacrosse</category><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac srx</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy express cng</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm recall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20512010/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/20512010/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20512010</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/2013-cadillac-srx-ny_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalling over 40,000 Chevy, Pontiac and Saturn models over fuel pump woes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-2009-gm-fuel-pump-recall-vehicles/"><img alt="Chevrolet Cobalt Coupe - orange - rear three-quarter view with couple" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/09/2007-chevrolet-cobalt-cpe.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 418px; " /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national%20highway%20traffic%20safety%20administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/recall/">recall</a> for a number of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/">General Motors</a> cars and crossovers bought or currently registered in the hot-climate states of Arkansas, Arizona, California, Nevada, Oklahoma and Texas. As many as 40,859 units consisting of the 2007 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/equinox/">Chevrolet Equinox</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/torrent/">Pontiac Torrent</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saturn/ion/">Saturn Ion</a> and the 2007-2009 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cobalt/">Chevrolet Cobalt</a> (shown) and its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/g5/">Pontiac G5</a> twin are being recalled for potential fuel leaks.<br />
<br />
This recall is being issued due to potentially faulty fuel pump components that can crack and cause gasoline to leak from the return or supply ports and possibly cause a fire. NHTSA has not indicated how many fuel leaks or vehicle fires have been reported. As a fix, GM will replace the fuel pump modules on all affected vehicles free of charge. Since <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/">Pontiac</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saturn/">Saturn</a> have been shuttered, owners will be able to go to another GM-brand dealership to have their vehicles repaired.<br />
<br />
While the list of affected cars and crossovers varies by state and model year, if you own any of these models and live in Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada, Oklahoma or Texas, be sure to check the official notice <a href="/2012/09/29/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/#continued">below</a> for more details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalling over 40,000 Chevy, Pontiac and Saturn models over fuel pump woes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/">GM recalling over 40,000 Chevy, Pontiac and Saturn models over fuel pump woes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20337128/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevy</category><category>cobalt</category><category>equinox</category><category>g5</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm</category><category>gm fuel pump recall</category><category>gm recall</category><category>ion</category><category>national highway trafiic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>pontiac</category><category>saturn</category><category>torrent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20337128/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/10/01/gm-recalling-over-40-000-chevy-pontiac-and-saturn-models-over-f/20337128/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20337128</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/09/2007-chevrolet-cobalt-cpe_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM wipes out with recall of 50,000 Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave crossovers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-gmc-acadia-denali-first-drive/#photo-3968891"><img alt="2011 GMC Acadia Denali front three-quarter" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/2011-gmc-acadia-denali-628.jpg" style="margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general motors">General Motors</a> has announced a recall of certain 2011 and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/enclave">2012 Buick Enclave</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/traverse">Chevrolet Traverse</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/acadia">GMC Acadia</a> models for wipers that may fail under heavy snow. According to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, snow or ice buildup may restrict the wiper movement, which may in turn lead to the wiper arm loosening from the vehicle. The ensuing reduced visibility could increase the risk of an accident. The recall only covers models currently registered in heavy snow states - about 50,000 units - including Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware and Idaho, among others. The full list may be found in the recall report <a href="/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/#continued">after the jump</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/gm">GM</a> is expected to begin notifying owners on Monday, April 16, and dealers will address the issue free of charge. In what sounds like one of the simpler and quicker recall fixes we can remember, dealer technicians will tighten the wiper arm nuts to prevent the wiper arms from becoming inoperable. Click <a href="/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/#continued">past the jump</a> for the full recall notice.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM wipes out with recall of 50,000 Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave crossovers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/">GM wipes out with recall of 50,000 Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave crossovers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20215006/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acadia</category><category>buick</category><category>buick enclave</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet traverse</category><category>enclave</category><category>gm recall</category><category>gmc</category><category>gmc acadia</category><category>traverse</category><category>windshield wiper recall</category><category>windshield wipers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20215006/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/04/13/gm-wipes-out-with-recall-of-50-000-chevy-traverse-gmc-acadia-an/20215006/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20215006</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/2011-gmc-acadia-denali-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Over 7,500 GM trucks recalled over two safety issues]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-colorado/" target="_blank"><img alt="2011 chevrolet colorado" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/2011-chevrolet-colorado-lead.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px; height: 388px; width: 630px;" /></a><br />
<div class="iphone_hide" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 10px; font-style: italic;">
	2011 Chevrolet Colorado - Click above for high-res image gallery</div>
<br />
A handful of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors">General Motors</a> trucks and sport utility vehicles need to head on in to their local dealerships. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has just issued a pair of recall notice for 7,507 vehicles as part of two separate safety actions.<br />
<br />
The first covers 6,768 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/colorado">Chevrolet Colorado</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/canyon">GMC Canyon</a> 2011 model year pickup trucks. According to NHTSA, an ornery transmission adjustment clip might not keep the shift cable in the correct position. This could cause drivers to think there truck is in park, when in fact it's just waiting to roll away in neutral.<br />
<br />
A smaller recall notice has been issued for 739 trucks and SUVs due to a steering shaft bolt that's been improperly tightened. If loose, it could make for rather difficult steering and cause an accident. This recall affects the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/escalade">2011 Cadillac Escalade</a>, Escalade ESV, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Chevrolet Silverado</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/suburban">Suburban</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/tahoe">Tahoe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/yukon">GMC Yukon</a> and Yukon XL.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2011/07/01/gm-recalls-over-7-500-trucks-in-two-recalls/#continued">Click past the jump</a> for the full NHTSA bulletins.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Over 7,500 GM trucks recalled over two safety issues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/">Over 7,500 GM trucks recalled over two safety issues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19981608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadillac</category><category>canyon</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>colorado</category><category>colorado recalls</category><category>escalade</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm recall</category><category>gmc</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recalls</category><category>silverado</category><category>suburban</category><category>tahoe</category><category>yukon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19981608/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/07/01/over-7-500-gm-trucks-recalled-over-two-safety-issues/19981608/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19981608</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/2011-chevrolet-colorado-lead_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM expands axle pin recall to include more pickups, SUVs]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=11V007&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/01/08-2011-gmc-sierra.jpg"  alt="2011 GMC Sierra" /></a><br />
<br />
It would seem that <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/general+motors">General Motors</a> has discovered that the defective axle cross pins responsible for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/24/gm-recalls-select-2011-model-year-pickup-and-suv-models-over-axl/">a recent recall</a> were installed in more vehicles than originally thought. The automaker has expanded the recall to cover a total of 26,751 vehicles, up from the 1,262 units in the original notice. As of right now, certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/escalade">2011 Cadillac Escalade</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/avalanche">Chevrolet Avalanche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/colorado">Colorado</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Silverado</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/suburban">Suburban</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/tahoe">Tahoe</a> models as well as <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/canyon">GMC Canyon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/sierra">Sierra</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/yukon">Yukon</a> models are included in the newest recall. <br />
<br />
As with before, the vehicles were built with rear axle cross pins that may not have been heat treated. As a result, the pieces could fracture and move out of position. If this happens, the defect could actually cause the rear axle to lock up while driving. Needless to say, the problem could easily cause an accident.<br />
<br />
GM will replace the pins free of charge, though the recall isn't scheduled to get underway until January 25. The company says that while one owner did experience a loss of power to the rear axle as a result of the defect, no accidents have been reported. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/#continued">Hit the jump</a> to take a look at the full recall notice.<br />
<br />
[Source: NHTSA]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM expands axle pin recall to include more pickups, SUVs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/">GM expands axle pin recall to include more pickups, SUVs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19803766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac recall</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet recall</category><category>general motors recall</category><category>gm recall</category><category>gmc</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19803766/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/01/17/gm-expands-axle-pin-recall-to-include-more-pickups-suvs/19803766/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19803766</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/01/08-2011-gmc-sierra_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalling pickups for missing child seat tether]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/11/2011-gmc-canyon-002-630op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors">General Motors</a> is recalling nearly 200,000 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/colorado">Chevrolet Colorado</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/canyon">GMC Canyon</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/isuzu">Isuzu</a> i280 and i370 pickups. The vehicles are apparently equipped with a top child restraint tether anchor that's not accessible as required by federal law in the center seating position. This means parents could fail to secure their children properly, potentially causing injury in the event of a collision. GM says that it discourages using a child safety seat in the center due to the proximity of the airbags. The recall covers 2004-2011 Canyon and Colorado models and 2007-2008 Isuzu trucks. <br />
<br />
GM says that its dealerships will service the vehicles under the recall free of charge.<br />
<br />
At this point, the company is unaware of any injuries caused by the design defect. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/#continued">Click past the jump</a> for the full press release.<br />
<br />
[Source: GM]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalling pickups for missing child seat tether</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/">GM recalling pickups for missing child seat tether</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19732697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>canyon</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet colorado</category><category>colorado</category><category>general motors</category><category>general motors recall</category><category>gm</category><category>gm recall</category><category>gmc</category><category>gmc canyon</category><category>isuzu</category><category>isuzu i280</category><category>isuzu i370</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19732697/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/11/24/gm-recalling-pickups-for-missing-child-seat-tether/19732697/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19732697</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/11/2011-gmc-canyon-002-630op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-buick-enclave/"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" alt="2010 Buick Enclave" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/2010-buick-enclave-white-630.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/enclave">Buick Enclave</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/traverse">Chevrolet Traverse</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/acadia/">GMC Acadia</a>, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/outlook">Saturn Outlook</a> CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."<br />
<br />
<img hspace="0" height="215" border="1" align="right" width="250" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/safety-belt-blurry-gm-250-1282059296.jpg"  alt="GM seatbelt recall" class="right border" />According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.<br />
<br />
GM will be working with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to administer the recall, which will see owners receiving letters beginning later this month to schedule an appointment for a no-cost inspection and repair of the affected belts. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/">Click through to the jump</a> for more details. <em>Top tip, NOS879!</em><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-buick-enclave">2010 Buick Enclave</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-buick-enclave/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/000-2010-buick-enclave_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-buick-enclave/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/001-2010-buick-enclave_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-buick-enclave/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/002-2010-buick-enclave_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-buick-enclave/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/003-2010-buick-enclave_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-buick-enclave/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/004-2010-buick-enclave_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: General Motors]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/">GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19596890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acadia</category><category>buick</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>enclave</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm</category><category>gm recall</category><category>gmc</category><category>lambda recall</category><category>outlook</category><category>saturn</category><category>seatbelt recall</category><category>traverse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19596890/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/08/17/gm-recalling-over-243-000-crossovers-over-possible-seat-belt-def/19596890/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19596890</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/2010-buick-enclave-white-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalls 1.5 million vehicles over heated windshield washer system]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/08/gm-recalls-1-5-million-vehicles-over-heated-windshield-washer-sy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/08/gm-recalls-1-5-million-vehicles-over-heated-windshield-washer-sy/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/08/gm-recalls-1-5-million-vehicles-over-heated-windshield-washer-sy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hummer/" rel="tag">Hummer</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a></p><a href="http://detnews.com/article/20100608/AUTO01/6080394/1148/rss25"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/hummer-heated-250op.jpg" /></a>Heated windshield washer system: Good. Heated windshield washer system that gets so hot it could potentially cause a fire: Recall. General Motors has announced that it is recalling some 1.5 million vehicles built between 2006 and 2009 for just such a problem. A similar measure was taken in 2008, but apparently the fix performed for that recall hasn't eradicated the issue entirely.<br />
<br />
The models affected consist of the <a href="http://autoblog.com/buick/enclave">Buick Enclave</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/lucerne">Lucerne</a>; <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/cts">Cadillac CTS</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/dts">DTS</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/escalade">Escalade</a>, Escalade ESV and Escalade EXT; <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/avalanche">Chevrolet Avalanche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Silverado 3500</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/suburban">Suburban</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/tahoe">Tahoe</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/traverse">Traverse</a>; <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/acadia">GMC Acadia</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/sierra">Sierra</a>, <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/yukon">Yukon</a>, Yukon XL, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/h2">Hummer H2</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/outlook">Saturn Outlook</a>. In lieu of a fix, it seems that The General is offering to pay owners $100 to remove the heated washer fluid system in its entirety.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://detnews.com/article/20100608/AUTO01/6080394/1148/rss25">The Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/08/gm-recalls-1-5-million-vehicles-over-heated-windshield-washer-sy/">GM recalls 1.5 million vehicles over heated windshield washer system</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://detnews.com/article/20100608/AUTO01/6080394/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/08/gm-recalls-1-5-million-vehicles-over-heated-windshield-washer-sy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19507892/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/08/gm-recalls-1-5-million-vehicles-over-heated-windshield-washer-sy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gm recall</category><category>GmRecall</category><category>heated washer fluid</category><category>heated washer fluid recall</category><category>HeatedWasherFluid</category><category>HeatedWasherFluidRecall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19507892/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/06/08/gm-recalls-1-5-million-vehicles-over-heated-windshield-washer-sy/19507892/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19507892</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/hummer-heated-250op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalls 5,000 vans with serious fire risk, tells owners to park outside, away from everything]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/#continued"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10fcct010-630op.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/"><br />
General Motors</a> issued a recall and stop sale on heavy-duty vans including the 2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/chevrolet">Chevrolet</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/express">Express</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motorsc">GMC Savana</a> due to a problem with the alternator that could potentially lead to a fire. GM advises owners to stop driving the vehicles immediately. adding that vehicles should be parked away from buildings and vehicles, and owners should promptly disconnect both battery cables. Vehicles should not be used until GM has come up with a fix for the problem.<br />
<br />
Many of the recalled vans are owned by company fleets. The recall includes all 2500, 3500, and 4500 models built in February and March of this year. Light duty vans are excluded from the recall because they utilize a different alternator. Some of the affected vehicles are utilized for retail operations and as rentals. With the stop sale order, the vans cannot be sold to customers and can not be rented from car rental agencies. Full details in the press release <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/#continued">after the jump</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalls 5,000 vans with serious fire risk, tells owners to park outside, away from everything</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/">GM recalls 5,000 vans with serious fire risk, tells owners to park outside, away from everything</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100327/RETAIL05/100329904/1147>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19416991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevy Express</category><category>chevy van</category><category>ChevyExpress</category><category>ChevyVan</category><category>fleet van</category><category>gm</category><category>gm fire</category><category>gm recall</category><category>gm van</category><category>gm van recall</category><category>GMC</category><category>gmc savana</category><category>GmcSavana</category><category>GmRecall</category><category>GmVan</category><category>GmVanRecall</category><category>heavy duty van</category><category>HeavyDutyVan</category><category>recall</category><category>recall alert</category><category>RecallAlert</category><category>recalls</category><category>recalls and safety</category><category>recallsandsafety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Loveday]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19416991/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/03/29/gm-recalls-5-000-vans-with-serious-fire-risk-tells-owners-to-pa/19416991/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19416991</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10fcct010-630op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalls 1.3 million Cobalts, G5s for power steering problem]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-cobalt-xfe/"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10chcb005opt.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2010 Chevrolet Cobalt XFE - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
Communications professionals know that the best time to release bad news about a company is at 5:15 pm on a Friday afternoon before a long weekend. By the time everyone comes back to work the following week, so much other stuff has happened that the story often gets lost in the shuffle. In the auto industry, another good time would be late in the evening just hours before a major overseas auto show while at the same time your biggest competitor is mired in a crisis of its own. <br />
<br />
As many of the world's automotive journalists were converging in Switzerland for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/geneva-motor-show/">Geneva Motor Show</a> late Monday night, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/chevrolet/">General Motors</a> announced it would recall 1.3 million <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/model/cobalt">Chevrolet Cobalts</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/model/cobalt">Pontiac G5s</a> built between 2005 and 2010. GM will replace the motors on their electric power assisted steering (EPAS). Over time the motors can reportedly fail and lead to a loss of steering assist. <br />
<br />
When the EPAS fails, the result is similar to a belt breaking on a hydraulic power steering pump. The car is still drivable and controllable, but the steering effort at low speeds rises significantly, making it difficult to maneuver at parking lot speeds. At higher speeds, relatively little steering assist is needed and drivers should be able to make it safely to the side of the road if the warning lamp comes on. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-cobalt-xfe">2010 Chevrolet Cobalt XFE</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-cobalt-xfe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10chcb003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-cobalt-xfe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10chcb004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-cobalt-xfe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10chcb005-1267540278_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-cobalt-xfe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10chcb006_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-chevrolet-cobalt-xfe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10chcb007_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: General Motors]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalls 1.3 million Cobalts, G5s for power steering problem</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/">GM recalls 1.3 million Cobalts, G5s for power steering problem</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19379315/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet cobalt</category><category>chevrolet cobalt recall</category><category>ChevroletCobalt</category><category>ChevroletCobaltRecall</category><category>chevy</category><category>Chevy Cobalt</category><category>ChevyCobalt</category><category>cobalt</category><category>cobalt recall</category><category>CobaltRecall</category><category>G5</category><category>gm recall</category><category>GmRecall</category><category>pontiac</category><category>pontiac g5</category><category>pontiac g5 recall</category><category>PontiacG5</category><category>PontiacG5Recall</category><category>steering failure</category><category>steering recall</category><category>SteeringFailure</category><category>SteeringRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:49:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19379315/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/03/02/gm-recalls-1-3-million-cobalts-g5s-for-power-steering-problem/19379315/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19379315</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/x10chcb005opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM, Isuzu recalling 185,000+ small pickups over faulty brakelights]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/gmc_canyon_630.jpg" /><br /> <br /> GM's midsize Colorado and Canyon pickups are being recalled, along with their Isuzu cousins, to replace a brake light switch that may be faulty. Nearly 186,000 of the pickups are affected by the problem, which could result in either no brake lights or brake lights that stay on. <br /> <br /> The afflicted vehicles were either originally sold, or are currently registered in 14 states and territories, though a program to cover other locales will be swinging into effect soon. New parts are in the pipeline, but won't arrive until February 2010. in the interim, owners who have trouble with their trucks can get a free repair, and they will be required to return to have the new part swapped in when it becomes available. More information can be found at NHTSA's safercar.gov website. Check out the press release after the jump for more details.<br /> <br /> [Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V310&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email">NHTSA</a>]<br /><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM, Isuzu recalling 185,000+ small pickups over faulty brakelights</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/">GM, Isuzu recalling 185,000+ small pickups over faulty brakelights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V310&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19117581/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>canyon brake light recall</category><category>canyon recall</category><category>CanyonBrakeLightRecall</category><category>CanyonRecall</category><category>chevrolet colorado recall</category><category>chevrolet pickup</category><category>chevrolet recall</category><category>ChevroletColoradoRecall</category><category>ChevroletPickup</category><category>ChevroletRecall</category><category>colorado brake light recall</category><category>colorado recall</category><category>ColoradoBrakeLightRecall</category><category>ColoradoRecall</category><category>false</category><category>gm recall</category><category>gmc canyon recall</category><category>gmc pickup</category><category>gmc recall</category><category>GmcCanyonRecall</category><category>GmcPickup</category><category>GmcRecall</category><category>GmRecall</category><category>isuzu i series</category><category>isuzu i series recall</category><category>isuzu i-290</category><category>isuzu i-370</category><category>IsuzuI-290</category><category>IsuzuI-370</category><category>IsuzuISeries</category><category>IsuzuISeriesRecall</category><category>pickup truck</category><category>PickupTruck</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:40:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19117581/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/08/03/gm-isuzu-recalling-185-000-small-pickups-over-faulty-brakeligh/19117581/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19117581</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/gmc_canyon_630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Doh! GM recalls 857,735 vehicles for electrical issue]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/recalls/recallsummary.cfm?rcl_campaign_id=08V441000&amp;prod_id=224529&amp;moduletype=VEHICLE&amp;make=BUICK&amp;model=ENCLAVE&amp;veh_model_year=2008&amp;searchtype=DrillDown"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/gm_logo1.jpg"  alt="" /></a>In the ongoing quest to make our cars more user-friendly, automakers have been adding more and more techno-goodies to make our lives just a bit easier, as well. Unfortunately, these features occasionally do the exact opposite as electrical gremlins take control and make them malfunction. Such is the case with a 857,735 vehicles from General Motors built between 2006 and 2008 that are equipped with heated windshield washer fluid. Apparently, the system is liable to short out, causing it to stop working and even smoke, give off an odor, and make other on-board electronic systems go haywire. To remedy the problem, dealers will add a new wiring harness with an in-line fuse, which will short out before the problematic printed electrical circuit does the same. We've pasted a list of all the affected vehicles after the break.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/recalls/recallsummary.cfm?rcl_campaign_id=08V441000&amp;prod_id=224529&amp;moduletype=VEHICLE&amp;make=BUICK&amp;model=ENCLAVE&amp;veh_model_year=2008&amp;searchtype=DrillDown">NHTSA</a> via <a href="http://goodcarbadcar.blogspot.com/2008/08/857735-vehicles-from-13-different.html">Good Car Bad Car</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Doh! GM recalls 857,735 vehicles for electrical issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/">Doh! GM recalls 857,735 vehicles for electrical issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/recalls/recallsummary.cfm?rcl_campaign_id=08V441000&amp;prod_id=224529&amp;moduletype=VEHICLE&amp;make=BUICK&amp;model=ENCLAVE&amp;veh_model_year=2008&amp;searchtype=DrillDown>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1299169/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gm recall</category><category>GmRecall</category><category>heated windshield wipers</category><category>HeatedWindshieldWipers</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1299169/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/08/29/doh-gm-recalls-857-735-vehicles-for-electrical-issue/1299169/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1299169</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/gm_logo1_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalling over 300,000 vehicles]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/gm-recalling-over-300-000-vehicles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/gm-recalling-over-300-000-vehicles/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/gm-recalling-over-300-000-vehicles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a></p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8TLUN281.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/x06ca_ct018_450-op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />After seeing a variety of reports cropping up this afternoon, we were finally able to get some hard information regarding a recall that's affecting 313,000 passenger vehicles and crossovers from General Motors. <br /><br />The recall involves a seal on the rear axle pinion that's apparently prone to leaking, which has the possibility of locking the driven wheels and causing a loss of control. GM will be recalling 2005-2007 Cadillac CTS models, STS sedans and SRX crossovers, as well as the 2006-2007 Pontiac Solstice and it's platform sibling the 2007 Saturn Sky. All told, that's 275,936 vehicles in the U.S., along with around 38,000 vehicles in Canada, Mexico, the Middle East and Asia.<br /><br />[Source: Business Week]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/gm-recalling-over-300-000-vehicles/">GM recalling over 300,000 vehicles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8TLUN281.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/gm-recalling-over-300-000-vehicles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1068836/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/gm-recalling-over-300-000-vehicles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadillac cts recall</category><category>cadillac srx recall</category><category>cadillac sts recall</category><category>CadillacCtsRecall</category><category>CadillacSrxRecall</category><category>CadillacStsRecall</category><category>general motors recall</category><category>GeneralMotorsRecall</category><category>gm recall</category><category>GmRecall</category><category>pontiac solstice recall</category><category>PontiacSolsticeRecall</category><category>saturn sky recall</category><category>SaturnSkyRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:12:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1068836/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/12/21/gm-recalling-over-300-000-vehicles/1068836/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1068836</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/x06ca_ct018_450-op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalling 90,000 vehicles for various issues]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/20/gm-recalling-90-000-for-various-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/20/gm-recalling-90-000-for-various-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/20/gm-recalling-90-000-for-various-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.mcall.com/business/local/all-gmrecall.6147256nov20,0,4810689.story"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/gm_logo1.jpg" alt="" /></a>GM is recalling 90,000 vehicles to fix issues such as safety foam, timing chains, and engine components. The models included are the 2007 Chevrolet Equinox and Pontiac Torrent, 2001 Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra with the 8.1-liter engine, and the 2.2-liter Saturn L-Series line. <br /><br />In Equinox and Torrent vehicles that weren't equipped with roof air bags or sunroofs, GM will be installing more foam around the windshields to protect against head injuries in an accident. Saturns will get a new timing chain, which could separate during driving if not replaced. Silverados and Sierras will receive new crankshaft position sensors. <br /><br />The repairs will be free to vehicle owners, of course, and GM has not heard of any accidents or injuries due to any of the recalled items. The recall begins next month, but in the mean time, go <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/">here</a> to look for your vehicle in the NHTSA database. <br /><br />[Source: Morning Call]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/20/gm-recalling-90-000-for-various-issues/">GM recalling 90,000 vehicles for various issues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mcall.com/business/local/all-gmrecall.6147256nov20,0,4810689.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/20/gm-recalling-90-000-for-various-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1044779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/20/gm-recalling-90-000-for-various-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gm 90,000 vehicles</category><category>gm recall</category><category>Gm90,000Vehicles</category><category>GmRecall</category><category>recall gm</category><category>RecallGm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1044779/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/11/20/gm-recalling-90-000-for-various-issues/1044779/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1044779</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/gm_logo1_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>