<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[2013 Ford models hit with trio of recalls, 465k for fire risk]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/03/2013-ford-models-hit-with-trio-of-recalls-465k-for-fire-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/03/2013-ford-models-hit-with-trio-of-recalls-465k-for-fire-risk/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/03/2013-ford-models-hit-with-trio-of-recalls-465k-for-fire-risk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-fusion-first-drive/#photo-5306549"><img alt="2013 Ford Fusion - front three-quarter view, silver" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/01a-2013-ford-fusion-fd.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130531/AUTO0102/306010007/1148/rss25">According to<em> The Detroit News</em></a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> is issuing three separate recalls on new 2013 models, one of which affects 465,000 vehicles. That largest recall comes as the result of 600 complaints of fuel leaks, which could lead to a fire risk, the report indicates. Included in the 465k-unit recall are the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/explorer/">2013 Explorer</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/flex/">Flex</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion/">Fusion</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/taurus/">Taurus</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/police+interceptor/">Police Interceptor sedan</a>, as well as the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mks/">Lincoln MKS</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mkt/">MKT</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mkz/">MKZ</a>.<br />
<br />
According to Ford, in a statement obtained by the <em>Detroit News</em>, "The condition could result in customers detecting a fuel odor, or in some cases, observe evidence of a fuel leak on the ground." Ford continues, "While a fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire, there have been no reports of fires. We are not aware of any accidents or injuries attributed to this condition."<br />
<br />
In addition to all of this, Ford is recalling 500 examples of its 2013 Lincoln MKZ equipped with engine block heaters. <em>The Detroit News</em> states that, according to Ford, the insulation on the engine block heater's electrical cord may crack in cold temperatures.<br />
<br />
Lastly, an extra 23 Ford Fusion models are being recalled due to potential impairment or loss of steering control. The News says this is due to faulty steering gears that may have been built without an internal retaining clip.<br />
<br />
Since launching, the 2013 Fusion has been the subject of a number of recalls, two of which have involved <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/ford-recalling-89k-2013-fusion-and-escape-models-over-engine-fir/">the potential for engine fires</a>. The fresh-faced 2013 Lincoln MKZ has had its own share of problems, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/12/lincoln-dealers-frustrated-over-slow-mkz-production-ramp-up/">early production woes</a> leaving many dealers without cars. Instances like this are causing Ford to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/07/ford-rethinking-vehicle-launch-strategy/">rethink its vehicle launch strategy</a>, in which the automaker will work better to smooth out the new car launch process, with the goal being fewer quality issues and recalls.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/03/2013-ford-models-hit-with-trio-of-recalls-465k-for-fire-risk/">2013 Ford models hit with trio of recalls, 465k for fire risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/03/2013-ford-models-hit-with-trio-of-recalls-465k-for-fire-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20596791/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/03/2013-ford-models-hit-with-trio-of-recalls-465k-for-fire-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>ford explorer</category><category>ford flex</category><category>ford fusion</category><category>ford police interceptor</category><category>ford recall</category><category>ford taurus</category><category>lincoln</category><category>lincoln mkt</category><category>lincoln mkz</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20596791/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/03/2013-ford-models-hit-with-trio-of-recalls-465k-for-fire-risk/20596791/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20596791</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/01a-2013-ford-fusion-fd_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalls 2013 Focus, C-Max and Escape over faulty child safety locks]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/15/ford-recalls-2013-focus-c-max-and-escape-over-faulty-child-safe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/15/ford-recalls-2013-focus-c-max-and-escape-over-faulty-child-safe/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/15/ford-recalls-2013-focus-c-max-and-escape-over-faulty-child-safe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-c-max-hybrid-first-drive/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/2013-ford-c-max-hybrid-fd.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
We have yet to find any official documentation from either <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> or the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, but <em>Edmunds</em> and <em>Cars.com</em> are both reporting that there is a recall on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/c-max/">2013 C-Max</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/focus/">Focus</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/escape/">Escape</a>. All three vehicles were assembled with a faulty child door lock mechanism on the left rear door that might not work properly allowing a child to accidently open the door from the inside.<br />
<br />
Affected vehicles were built in the middle of November, 2012 totaling somewhere between 5,600 and just over 7,000 units, and concerned owners can call Ford at 866-436-7332 or NHTSA at 888-327-4236 to see if their vehicles are involved in this recall. The recall doesn't go into effect until March 25, but in the meantime, owners can probably check the operation of the door or position children on the right side of the car, if possible, until the recall has been performed.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/15/ford-recalls-2013-focus-c-max-and-escape-over-faulty-child-safe/">Ford recalls 2013 Focus, C-Max and Escape over faulty child safety locks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/15/ford-recalls-2013-focus-c-max-and-escape-over-faulty-child-safe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20505180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/15/ford-recalls-2013-focus-c-max-and-escape-over-faulty-child-safe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 ford c-max</category><category>2013 ford escape</category><category>2013 ford focus</category><category>c-max</category><category>c-max recall</category><category>escape</category><category>escape recall</category><category>focus</category><category>focus recall</category><category>ford</category><category>ford recall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:45:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20505180/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/03/15/ford-recalls-2013-focus-c-max-and-escape-over-faulty-child-safe/20505180/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20505180</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/2013-ford-c-max-hybrid-fd_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalls 140,000 new Focus models over wiper concern]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-ford-focus-first-drive/"><img alt="2012 Ford Focus hatchback - yellow - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/01/lead1-2012-ford-focus-fd.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px; " /></a><br />
<br />
The National Highway Traffic Safety Association has announced on its website that <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> is recalling 140,000 <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/focus/">Focus</a> models built between August 1, 2010 and October 18, 2011. The defect in question is a seal in the wiring harness connector to the passenger side wiper motor that may be missing.<br />
<br />
If the seal is AWOL, water can build up in the connector, which could over time render the passenger-side wiper useless. And if that happens, visibility could of course be altered, resulting in a higher probability of a crash.<br />
<br />
To fix the issue, affected Focus owners need to take their vehicles to a Ford dealer for a free inspection of the wiper connector. A technician will clean and seal any connector that needs it, and any wiper motor that no longer works will be replaced free of charge. Hit the jump to read over the NHTSA press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford recalls 140,000 new Focus models over wiper concern</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/">Ford recalls 140,000 new Focus models over wiper concern</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20210741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012 ford focus</category><category>focus</category><category>focus recall</category><category>ford</category><category>ford focus recall</category><category>ford recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>wiper</category><category>wiring harness</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20210741/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/04/08/ford-recalls-140-000-new-focus-models-over-wiper-concern/20210741/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20210741</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/01/lead1-2012-ford-focus-fd_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling over 26,000 trucks over taillamp issues]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/#continued"><img alt="2010 Ford Ranger" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/2010-ranger.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 0px; width: 630px; height: 377px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> has announced a recall of 26,715 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/e-series/">E-Series</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ford excursion">Excursion</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/ranger">Ranger</a> vehicles for a defective hazard warning, signal and brake light switch. According to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, certain F-250, F-350, F-450 and F-550 vehicles manufactured between 2002 and 2007, certain Excursion models built between 2002 and 2005 and Ranger pickups built between 2002 and 2011 may have been assembled with a faulty switch that could deform over time.<br />
<br />
All of the vehicles were manufactured at the automaker's Twin Cities plant. The deformed switches may eventually lead to malfunctioning lights, which <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">NHTSA</a> warns may increase the risk of an accicent. What's more, the recall also covers certain service parts distributed to dealers as well.<br />
<br />
Ford dealers will replace the faulty switches free of charge once the recall begins on or around August 31, 2011. NHTSA urges owners to call Ford customer service with any questions related to the recall. <a href="/2011/07/20/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/#continued">Click past the jump</a> for a look at the full recall notice.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford recalling over 26,000 trucks over taillamp issues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/">Ford recalling over 26,000 trucks over taillamp issues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19995963/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>excursion</category><category>f-250</category><category>f-350</category><category>f-series</category><category>ford</category><category>ford recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>ranger</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19995963/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/07/21/ford-recalling-over-26-000-trucks-over-taillamp-issues/19995963/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19995963</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/2010-ranger_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalls Five Hundred, Mercury Montego sedans over fuel tank woes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercury/" rel="tag">Mercury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-mercury-montego-premier-awd/"><img alt="2007 Mercury Montego Premier" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/2007-mercury-montego-premier.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> has announced through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it is recalling nearly 3,000 examples of its Five Hundred and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercury">Mercury</a> Montego (pictured) sedans from the 2007 model year.<br />
<br />
The action, which affects 2,945 vehicles, is due to potentially defective welds between the filler neck and the fuel tank, a condition that could result in a fuel leak or the smell of gasoline reaching the occupants. In the worst-case scenario, a leak could cause a fire. Cars with the affected fuel tank problem could see an illuminated dashboard warning light as a result of the evaporative emissions leak being detected.<br />
<br />
Ford will inspect and replace the fuel tank at no cost to owners (those who have already had the procedure done at-cost can apply for reimbursement), and the Dearborn automaker will begin notifying Five Hundred and Montego owners beginning August 15. Check out the official NHTSA press release <a href="/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/#continued">after the jump</a> for further details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford recalls Five Hundred, Mercury Montego sedans over fuel tank woes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/">Ford recalls Five Hundred, Mercury Montego sedans over fuel tank woes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19993066/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>five hundred</category><category>ford</category><category>ford five hundred</category><category>ford five-hundred</category><category>ford recall</category><category>mercury</category><category>mercury monterey</category><category>mercury recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19993066/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/07/18/ford-recalls-five-hundred-mercury-montego-sedans-over-fuel-tank/19993066/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19993066</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/07/2007-mercury-montego-premier_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Feds expand F-150 fuel tank strap investigation to 2.7 million pickups]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/09/feds-expand-f-150-fuel-tank-strap-investigation-to-2-7-million-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/09/feds-expand-f-150-fuel-tank-strap-investigation-to-2-7-million-p/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/09/feds-expand-f-150-fuel-tank-strap-investigation-to-2-7-million-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://detnews.com/article/20110509/AUTO01/105090347/1148/NHTSA-expands-probe-into-2.7-million-F-150-pickups"><img alt="2001 ford f-150 fuel tank strap rust" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/2001-ford-f-150.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/f-150/">Ford F-150</a> has been the best-selling truck in America for decades. That's a very big feather in the Blue Oval's cap, but when the truck line is bit by the recall bug, its massive volume can be a very bad thing.<br />
<br />
<em>The Detroit News</em> is reporting that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced that it has upgraded its investigation into 2.7 million 1997-2001 F-150 pickups for fuel tank straps that have rusted and failed. If the straps rust and fail, NHTSA says there is a chance that the tank could drop and hit the road, causing a fuel leak. Back in September, NHTSA's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/13/report-nhtsa-probing-ford-f-150-fuel-tank-straps/">initial investigation</a> included 1.4 million vehicles.<br />
<br />
Of the 339 complaints NHTSA and <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> have received so far, one has resulted in a brief fire that quickly flamed out, while a second complaint lead to a fire that actually destroyed the vehicle. According to the report, there have been a total of nine documented incidents in which fuel has leaked from the tank as a result of a failed tank strap, though there have no injuries linked to these incidents.<br />
<br />
For its part, Ford says it is continuing to support NHTSA's investigation. The government safety agency says its investigation has "yielded information that strongly suggests the subject defect as the cause of the reported problem," suggesting a recall may be on the horizon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/09/feds-expand-f-150-fuel-tank-strap-investigation-to-2-7-million-p/">Feds expand F-150 fuel tank strap investigation to 2.7 million pickups</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/09/feds-expand-f-150-fuel-tank-strap-investigation-to-2-7-million-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19935390/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/09/feds-expand-f-150-fuel-tank-strap-investigation-to-2-7-million-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>f series</category><category>f-150</category><category>f-150 recall</category><category>f-series</category><category>f150</category><category>f150 fuel tank</category><category>ford f-150</category><category>ford pickup</category><category>ford recall</category><category>fuel tank strap leak</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19935390/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/05/09/feds-expand-f-150-fuel-tank-strap-investigation-to-2-7-million-p/19935390/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19935390</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/2001-ford-f-150_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford F-150 airbag recall balloons by 1.2M units]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img alt="2006 ford f-150" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/02/f-150.jpg" style="margin: 4px 0px; width: 630px; height: 410px;" /><br />
<br />
Back in February, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/23/ford-recalling-150-000-f-150-models-for-faulty-airbag-deployment/">we told you</a> about the recall of 150,000 <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/f-150">Ford F-150</a> models due to driver-side airbags that went off on their own right after starting the vehicle. At the time, <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/ford">Ford</a> said the recall was limited to 150,000 units out of the 1.3 million vehicles being investigated due to the fact that the problem only surfaced on vehicles built on the first shift at the automaker's Norfolk, Virginia plant.<br />
<br />
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced on its website that the recall has now been extended to include 1.2 million 2004-2006 model year F-150 models, along with its luxury cousin, the Lincoln Mark LT. NHTSA says it has received 238 instances of inadvertent deployment and 77 total injuries.<br />
<br />
NHTSA indicates that the airbag issue stems from a clockspring jumper wire that could come in contact with the airbag lower horn plate. The friction between the wire and the horn plate could result in chafing, potentially shorting the circuit. And when that happens, an unsuspecting F-150 owner could receive an airbag surprise.<br />
<br />
To fix the problem, owners of the affected vehicles will be able to head to the nearest Ford or Lincoln dealer for a free repair. Technicians will install a new clockspring jumper with a protective mesh cover. Hit the jump to read over the NHTSA press release.<br />
<br />
[Source: NHTSA via <a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2011/04/ford-expanding-f-150-recall-for-airbag-problem-by-12-million-trucks.html">Pickuptrucks.com</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford F-150 airbag recall balloons by 1.2M units</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/">Ford F-150 airbag recall balloons by 1.2M units</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19913079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.2 million f-150 airbag</category><category>airbag recall</category><category>f-150 airbag</category><category>f-150 recall</category><category>f-series</category><category>ford</category><category>ford f-150</category><category>ford recall</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19913079/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/04/14/ford-f-150-airbag-recall-balloons-by-1-2m-units/19913079/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19913079</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/02/f-150_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: Continental recalling nearly 400,000 tires used on Ford F-Series pickups]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/"><img alt="2008 Ford F-250" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/03/ford-super-duty.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 0px; width: 630px; height: 422px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Due to some apparently shoddy rubber, Continental and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> are recalling <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/model/super+duty">2008-2009 F-250 and F-350</a> pickup trucks equipped with certain tires. The issue lies with nearly 400,000 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/continental+tires">Continental</a> tires that are susceptible to uneven wear and, in certain situations, can experience tread belt separation. If that occurs, the risk of an accident will rise substantially.<br />
<br />
This <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/">recall</a> affects trucks built from May 6th, 2007 through September 20th, 2008. Approximately 390,657 units are faulty and the specific tires in question are:<br />
<ul>
	<li>
		Continental Contitrac LT275/70R18 125/122S (outline white letters, black sidewall)</li>
	<li>
		Continental Contitrac TR BSW LT275/70R18 125/122S (black sidewall)</li>
	<li>
		Continental Contitrac TR OWL LT275/70R18 125/122S</li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/#continued">Click past the jump</a> to read the full <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">NHTSA</a> bulletin. And yes, we clearly are all reminded that this isn't <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/21/firestone-renews-radial-tire-recall-effort/">the first foray</a> Ford has had with not-so-great tires...<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=11T002&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true" target="_blank">NHTSA</a> via <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2011/03/recall-continental-tires-uneven-wear-belt-separation-risks-ford-trucks.html" target="_blank">Consumer Reports</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Report: Continental recalling nearly 400,000 tires used on Ford F-Series pickups</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/">Report: Continental recalling nearly 400,000 tires used on Ford F-Series pickups</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=11T002&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19886819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>continental recall</category><category>continental tires</category><category>continental tires recall</category><category>f-series recall</category><category>ford</category><category>ford f-250</category><category>ford f-350</category><category>ford recall</category><category>recall</category><category>tire recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19886819/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/03/21/report-continental-recalling-nearly-400-000-tires-used-on-ford/19886819/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19886819</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/03/ford-super-duty_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford announces two recalls, more than 30,000 vehicles affected]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/03/ford-announces-two-recalls-more-than-30-000-vehicles-affected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/03/ford-announces-two-recalls-more-than-30-000-vehicles-affected/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/03/ford-announces-two-recalls-more-than-30-000-vehicles-affected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img alt="2010 Ford Ranger plays in the mud" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/2010-ranger.jpg" style="width: 630px; height: 377px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px;" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<strong><em><small>2010 Ford Ranger - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></em></strong></div>
<br />
<em>The Detroit News</em> is reporting that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford">Ford</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway transportation safety administration">The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a> have announced the recall of over 30,000 vehicles. A total of 23,688 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/ranger">Ranger</a> pickups are being brought back to dealers to inspect fuel lines for potential chafing. The problem may result in a gasoline odor or a fuel leak, but is only present on 2010 vehicles equipped with the company's 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine. Additionally, Ford is also re-inspecting certain 2011 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150">F-150</a>, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/edge">Edge</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/flex">Flex</a> models that were covered under a previous recall last December.<br />
<br />
Those 14,737 vehicles were originally recalled for body control modules that could short out and lead to a fire. The first time around, Ford used a software program to read the serial numbers on the defective parts to correctly identify the pieces that were likely to fail. Unfortunately, the program was apparently reading the wrong set of characters. As a result, some of the faulty modules may not have been replaced. As a result, Ford will take a second look at the parts in hopes of finding those that could be a problem later down the line.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1">2010 Ford Ranger</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-000_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://detnews.com/article/20110302/AUTO01/103020396/Ford-issues-two-new-recalls-for-more-than-30-000-vehicles#ixzz1FSJ3YJWw">The Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/03/ford-announces-two-recalls-more-than-30-000-vehicles-affected/">Ford announces two recalls, more than 30,000 vehicles affected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/03/ford-announces-two-recalls-more-than-30-000-vehicles-affected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19866408/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/03/ford-announces-two-recalls-more-than-30-000-vehicles-affected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010  ford ranger recall</category><category>2010 ford ranger</category><category>ford</category><category>ford ranger</category><category>ford ranger recall</category><category>ford recall</category><category>national highway transportation safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>ranger</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:21:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19866408/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/03/03/ford-announces-two-recalls-more-than-30-000-vehicles-affected/19866408/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19866408</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/01/2010-ranger_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling nearly 15,000 F-Series and Edge/Lincoln MKX crossovers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-over-14-700-vehicles-for-potential-fire-risk/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" class="right border" alt="Ford Recalls" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/ford-logo-250.jpg" /></a>If you thought 2010 was going to wrap up with an all quiet on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/recall">recall</a> front, think again. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford">Ford</a> and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a> have announced the recall of 14,737 vehicles for a faulty body control module that may short out and cause a fire. <br />
<br />
The recall covers certain 2011 models that were built in a six-day period, including some 2011 Edge, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150">F-150</a>, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550 and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/mkx">Lincoln MKX</a> vehicles. NHTSA says that if the body control module shorts out, it could overheat and cause a fire. <br />
<br />
Dealers are expected to inspect the module and, if necessary, replace it free of charge. NHTSA says that Ford plans to start the work on or before January 10, 2011, and that owners may contact Ford directly with questions at 1-866-436-7332. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-over-14-700-vehicles-for-potential-fire-risk/#continued">Hit the jump</a> for a look at the full recall notice.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=10V659000&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=rss">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford recalling nearly 15,000 F-Series and Edge/Lincoln MKX crossovers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/">Ford recalling nearly 15,000 F-Series and Edge/Lincoln MKX crossovers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19781523/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 ford edge</category><category>2011 ford f-150</category><category>2011 lincoln mkx</category><category>breaking</category><category>edge</category><category>f-150</category><category>f-250</category><category>f-350</category><category>f-450</category><category>f-550</category><category>ford</category><category>ford recall</category><category>mkx</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19781523/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/12/30/ford-recalling-nearly-15-000-f-series-and-edge-lincoln-mkx-cross/19781523/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19781523</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/ford-logo-250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2011 Ford Edge, Lincoln MKX get first recall]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/29/2011-ford-edge-lincoln-mkx-get-first-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/29/2011-ford-edge-lincoln-mkx-get-first-recall/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/29/2011-ford-edge-lincoln-mkx-get-first-recall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-edge-first-drive/#3286721"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" alt="2011 Ford Edge Sport" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/edge-630.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2011 Ford Edge Sport - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
That was quick. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford">Ford</a> has issued a recall for a whopping 71 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/mkx">2011 Lincoln MKX</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/edge">2011 Ford Edge</a> models due to rear latches that are unable to be locked. According to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a>, the locks weren't programmed properly from the factory, and as such, the rear gate can't be locked by any of the buttons inside of the vehicle or even the key fob.<br />
<br />
NHTSA says that the problem violates the agency's motor vehicle safety standard number 206 pertaining to locks and door retention components. <br />
<br />
Ford will reprogram the locks free of charge, and the recall is set to get under way starting on November 1. Owners can contact Ford or the NHTSA to learn more about having their vehicles repaired.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-edge-first-drive">2011 Ford Edge: First Drive</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-edge-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/01fordedge2011fd_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-edge-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/02fordedge2011fd_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-edge-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/03fordedge2011fd_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-edge-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/04fordedge2011fd_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-edge-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/05fordedge2011fd_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-lincoln-mkx-first-drive">2011 Lincoln MKX: First Drive</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-lincoln-mkx-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/01lincolnmkxfd2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-lincoln-mkx-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/02lincolnmkxfd2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-lincoln-mkx-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/03lincolnmkxfd2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-lincoln-mkx-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/04lincolnmkxfd2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-lincoln-mkx-first-drive/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/05lincolnmkxfd2011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<em><strong><small>Photos by Zach Bowman / Copyright (C)2010 AOL.</small></strong></em><br />
[Sources: NHTSA, <a href="http://www.familycarguide.com/blog/1050969_2011-lincoln-mkx-ford-edge-in-first-recall">Family Car Guide</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/29/2011-ford-edge-lincoln-mkx-get-first-recall/">2011 Ford Edge, Lincoln MKX get first recall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/29/2011-ford-edge-lincoln-mkx-get-first-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19695538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/29/2011-ford-edge-lincoln-mkx-get-first-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 ford edge</category><category>2011 lincoln mkx</category><category>edge</category><category>ford</category><category>ford edge</category><category>ford recall</category><category>lincoln</category><category>lincoln mkx</category><category>mkx</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19695538/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/10/29/2011-ford-edge-lincoln-mkx-get-first-recall/19695538/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19695538</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/edge-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: 8.4M recalled Ford models still on the road without fixes]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/23/report-8-4m-recalled-ford-models-still-on-the-road-without-fixe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/23/report-8-4m-recalled-ford-models-still-on-the-road-without-fixe/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/23/report-8-4m-recalled-ford-models-still-on-the-road-without-fixe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101021/RETAIL05/101029958/1254"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" class="right border" alt="Ford" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/ford-logo-250.jpg" /></a>According to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a>, there are around 8.4 million recalled <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford">Ford</a> vehicles on the road right now that have never been serviced for a potential fire risk. The vehicles are the remainder of a 14 million-unit recall that covered 1993-2003 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150">F-Series</a> pickups, 1995-2003 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/windstar">Windstars</a>, 1995-2002 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/explorer">Explorers</a> and 1995-2003 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ranger">Rangers</a> that were built with faulty cruise control units. The units could leak onto the vehicles' anti-lock brake system and cause a fire even if the vehicle is off. <br />
<br />
Ford says that it has done its best to notify owners of the problem multiple times and NHTSA agrees that the company's efforts have been adequate. Unfortunately, many of the current owners may have bought the recalled vehicles used and thus may not even know that there's a potential problem. <br />
<br />
The recall is the largest in the history of the automotive industry, so it should come as no surprise that there are still some loose ends to be tied up. Owners can search to see if there are outstanding recalls on their vehicles <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/recallsearch.cfm">at the NHTSA website</a>. If that's the case, NHTSA urges owners to take their vehicle to the dealer as soon as possible.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101021/RETAIL05/101029958/1254">Automotive News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/23/report-8-4m-recalled-ford-models-still-on-the-road-without-fixe/">Report: 8.4M recalled Ford models still on the road without fixes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/23/report-8-4m-recalled-ford-models-still-on-the-road-without-fixe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19685887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/23/report-8-4m-recalled-ford-models-still-on-the-road-without-fixe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford recall</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:33:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19685887/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/10/23/report-8-4m-recalled-ford-models-still-on-the-road-without-fixe/19685887/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19685887</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/ford-logo-250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Official: Ford Windstar recalled over rear axle risk]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/27/official-ford-windstar-recalled-over-rear-axle-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/27/official-ford-windstar-recalled-over-rear-axle-risk/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/27/official-ford-windstar-recalled-over-rear-axle-risk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hjjuA1vK9dSLzf3YZdWNR4pf3AxAD9HRT2J00"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" alt="Ford Windstar recall" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/2000windstar02.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Back in May, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration started <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/11/report-hundreds-of-complaints-about-ford-windstar-axles-snappin/">investigating cases of rear axles breaking</a> in late model <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/windstar">Ford Windstar</a> minivans after receiving hundreds of complaints from owners. Over three months later, an official recall has just been announced that covers 575,000 1998-2003 Windstars sold in "Salt Belt" states - places where road salt is used to melt away snow and ice during the winter months. Road salt can accelerate corrosion on the rear axle, which can cause the axle beam to break completely.<br />
<br />
Ford says that only a small number of reported cases involve instances of the rear axle beams actually snapping, even though NHTSA supposedly received over 200 complaints from owners. Still, Ford will be notifying owners of this potential hazard starting on September 27, and naturally, the problem will be fixed free of charge.<br />
<br />
Interestingly enough, this recall does not mention anything about the Windstar's front subframes - another easily corroded area that triggered <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/30/report-nhtsa-expands-ford-windstar-corrosion-probe-to-front-sub/">a second NHTSA investigation</a> in late July. More than 900,000 vehicles could have been affected by this, and we assume that NHTSA's findings did not warrant a full recall. Still, this rear axle issue will be the eleventh recall placed on the Windstar, a model that was only built for a total of nine years.<br />
<br />
[Source: Associated Press via <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hjjuA1vK9dSLzf3YZdWNR4pf3AxAD9HRT2J00">Google</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/27/official-ford-windstar-recalled-over-rear-axle-risk/">Official: Ford Windstar recalled over rear axle risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hjjuA1vK9dSLzf3YZdWNR4pf3AxAD9HRT2J00>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/27/official-ford-windstar-recalled-over-rear-axle-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19611142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/27/official-ford-windstar-recalled-over-rear-axle-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>ford recall</category><category>Ford Windstar</category><category>ford windstar axles</category><category>Ford Windstar Recall</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>FordWindstar</category><category>FordWindstarAxles</category><category>FordWindstarRecall</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>nhtsa recall</category><category>NhtsaRecall</category><category>Windstar</category><category>Windstar Axles</category><category>windstar recall</category><category>WindstarAxles</category><category>WindstarRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19611142/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/08/27/official-ford-windstar-recalled-over-rear-axle-risk/19611142/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19611142</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/08/2000windstar02_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling select 2010 Ranger pickups over rollaway risk]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/#1338974"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/ranger-10.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2010 Ford Ranger - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
The last major <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ranger">Ford Ranger</a> redesign ocurred in 1993. Bill Clinton was president, the Internet was almost completely unknown and many Autoblog readers were in utero or non-existant. In the 17 years that followed, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> has done next to nothing to their neglected little pickup, yet we still have a recall notice for the 2010 model year. <br />
<br />
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced the recall of 2,934 Ford Rangers equipped with manual transmissions. The vehicles reportedly contain a potentially defective parking brake cable that can be disconnected from the right rear actuator in colder climates. The condition presents itself when the brake is released and a wet parking brake shoe is frozen in the applied position. If the cable becomes disconnected, the parking brake may not fully engage.<br />
<br />
Affected vehicles were built between June 8, 2009 and February 2, 2010. If you purchased one of these Rangers, you can take it to the nearest Ford dealer. The dealer will replace your faulty parking brake actuator free of charge. Hit the jump to read over the NHTSA press release.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1">2010 Ford Ranger</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-000_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-ranger-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/2010-ford-ranger-004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: NHTSA]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford recalling select 2010 Ranger pickups over rollaway risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/">Ford recalling select 2010 Ranger pickups over rollaway risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 26 May 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19490738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford ranger recall</category><category>ford recall</category><category>FordRangerRecall</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>ranger recall</category><category>ranger recall parking brake</category><category>RangerRecall</category><category>RangerRecallParkingBrake</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19490738/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/05/26/ford-recalling-select-2010-ranger-pickups-over-rollaway-risk/19490738/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19490738</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/ranger-10_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling 33,000 vehicles to replace... seat recliner?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/fusion-sport-630.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> has announced a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/22/390-million-vehicles-recalled-since-1966-and-other-fun-recall/">recall</a> of some 33,000 vehicles due to faulty front seat manual reclining mechanisms. The recall affects certain 2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion">Ford Fusion</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/explorer">Explorer</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ExplorerSportTrac/">Explorer SportTrac</a> models, as well as 2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/mercury/">Mercury</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/mountaineer">Mountaineer</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/milan">Milan</a> vehicles. Both the Blue Oval and NHTSA are concerned that during an accident the mechanisms could fail and cause the back of the seat to move toward the rear of the vehicle, resulting in a possible injury.<br />
<br />
While no injuries have been reported as a result of the defect, NHTSA found that the seats don't meet federal standards for head restraints and must be replaced. Ford will replace the hardware free of charge. For more information, visit <a href="http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/">NHTSA's</a> website.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gHJOXgAKq7uwY8i1ABO1zk9GetbwD9F8S3202">Associated Press</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/">Ford recalling 33,000 vehicles to replace... seat recliner?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19452296/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010</category><category>2010 Ford Explorer</category><category>2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac</category><category>2010 Ford Fusion</category><category>2010 Mercury Milan</category><category>2010 Mercury Mountaineer</category><category>2010FordExplorer</category><category>2010FordExplorerSportTrac</category><category>2010FordFusion</category><category>2010MercuryMilan</category><category>2010MercuryMountaineer</category><category>Explorer</category><category>Explorer Recall</category><category>Explorer Sport Trac</category><category>Explorer Sport Trac Recall</category><category>ExplorerRecall</category><category>ExplorerSportTrac</category><category>ExplorerSportTracRecall</category><category>Ford Explorer</category><category>Ford Explorer Sport Trac</category><category>Ford Fusion</category><category>Ford Recall</category><category>FordExplorer</category><category>FordExplorerSportTrac</category><category>FordFusion</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>Fusion</category><category>Fusion Recall</category><category>FusionRecall</category><category>Mercury</category><category>Mercury Milan</category><category>Mercury Mountaineer</category><category>MercuryMilan</category><category>MercuryMountaineer</category><category>Milan</category><category>Milan Recall</category><category>MilanRecall</category><category>Mountaineer</category><category>Mountaineer Recall</category><category>MountaineerRecall</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>NHTSA Recall</category><category>NhtsaRecall</category><category>Recall</category><category>Sport Trac</category><category>SportTrac</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:21:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19452296/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/04/23/ford-recalling-33-000-vehicles-to-replace-seat-recliner/19452296/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19452296</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/fusion-sport-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling 605,000 full-size trucks]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a></p><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080514/BUSINESS01/80514038/1014/rss13"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/07fordf150_05_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />Ford Motor Company is recalling a whole herd of trucks to see the team doctors over concerns about a hose in the braking system that could adversely effect the vehicles' braking power. According to the NHTSA, about 605,000 2005 and 2006 model year Ford F150 and Lincoln Mark LT trucks equipped with the 3-valve 5.4-liter V8 will receive a hose replacement free of charge. The problem hose supplies the brake booster with engine vacuum, and could swell over time and eventually become disconnected. While the hydraulic braking system will function without the power assist, pedal effort will be significantly increased, and if drivers are taken off-guard by the problem an accident could occur. Ford will start notifying owners in June, and the recall campaign will kick off in July. According to FoMoCo, there have been 11 minor accidents related to the issue. Check out more details from the NHTSA after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080514/BUSINESS01/80514038/1014/rss13">Detroit Free Press</a>]<br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford recalling 605,000 full-size trucks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/">Ford recalling 605,000 full-size trucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 14:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080514/BUSINESS01/80514038/1014/rss13>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1195486/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2005</category><category>2005 f150</category><category>2005 mark lt</category><category>2005F150</category><category>2005MarkLt</category><category>2006</category><category>2006 f150</category><category>2006 mark lt</category><category>2006F150</category><category>2006MarkLt</category><category>brake booster</category><category>BrakeBooster</category><category>ford brake booster recall</category><category>ford f-150</category><category>ford f150 recall</category><category>ford pickup</category><category>ford recall</category><category>ford recalls</category><category>ford truck</category><category>FordBrakeBoosterRecall</category><category>FordF-150</category><category>FordF150Recall</category><category>FordPickup</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>FordRecalls</category><category>FordTruck</category><category>lincoln mark lt</category><category>lincoln pickup</category><category>lincoln truck</category><category>LincolnMarkLt</category><category>LincolnPickup</category><category>LincolnTruck</category><category>mark lt</category><category>mark lt recall</category><category>MarkLt</category><category>MarkLtRecall</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1195486/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/05/14/ford-recalling-605-000-full-size-trucks/1195486/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1195486</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/07fordf150_05_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling 470,000 Mustangs to tweak airbag software]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/27/ford-recalling-470-000-mustangs-to-tweak-airbag-software/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/27/ford-recalling-470-000-mustangs-to-tweak-airbag-software/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/27/ford-recalling-470-000-mustangs-to-tweak-airbag-software/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-mustang-gt-convertible/264475/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/abgar_an_stangvrt029_lores.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em>Click image for a high-res gallery</em><br /><br />If you own an '05 - '08 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/05/autoblog-garage-special-memorial-day-with-the-mustang-gt/">Ford Mustang</a>, watch your mailbox for a recall notice from the Oval in the coming days. It turns out that the NHTSA learned that the passenger-side frontal airbag could potentially deploy with greater-than-allowable force for a petite, unrestrained passenger. Over 470,000 of the ponycars qualify for the recall, with 435,000 of them located in the US. A dealer-performed software update will correct the problem. According to Ford, there are no reported injuries related to the issue, and the particular scenario in which the problem could manifest itself is rare. <br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-mustang-gt-convertible">2007 Ford Mustang GT Convertible</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-mustang-gt-convertible/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/abgar_an_stangvrt002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-mustang-gt-convertible/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/abgar_an_stangvrt004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-mustang-gt-convertible/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/abgar_an_stangvrt005_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-mustang-gt-convertible/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/abgar_an_stangvrt006_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-ford-mustang-gt-convertible/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/abgar_an_stangvrt007_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Sources: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/27/news/companies/ford_recalls.ap/index.htm?section=money_autos">CNNMoney</a><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080227/ANA02/298638521/1181">]</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/27/ford-recalling-470-000-mustangs-to-tweak-airbag-software/">Ford recalling 470,000 Mustangs to tweak airbag software</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/27/news/companies/ford_recalls.ap/index.htm?section=money_autos>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/27/ford-recalling-470-000-mustangs-to-tweak-airbag-software/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1126292/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/27/ford-recalling-470-000-mustangs-to-tweak-airbag-software/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2005 ford mustang</category><category>2005FordMustang</category><category>2006 Ford Mustang</category><category>2006FordMustang</category><category>2007 Ford Mustang</category><category>2007FordMustang</category><category>2008 Ford mustang</category><category>2008FordMustang</category><category>air bag force</category><category>AirBagForce</category><category>breaking</category><category>ford recall</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>mustang</category><category>Mustang recall</category><category>MustangRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:34:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1126292/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/02/27/ford-recalling-470-000-mustangs-to-tweak-airbag-software/1126292/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1126292</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/abgar_an_stangvrt029_lores_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford recalling 180,000 vans and SUVs for two issues]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/ford-recalling-180-000-vans-and-suvs-for-two-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/ford-recalling-180-000-vans-and-suvs-for-two-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/ford-recalling-180-000-vans-and-suvs-for-two-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080211/BIZ/802110442/1148/AUTO01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/08expd_ltd_c8021_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />Another day, another recall. This time it's Ford with two separate recalls that involve its big SUVs and full-size vans. The first affects 124,000 Ford Expeditions and Lincoln Navigators built from 2007 to 2008. Apparently the spring system inside their door handles could break. While not a life threatening defect, Ford says there is the possibility of the latches opening in a side crash. No injuries or accidents have been attributed to the faulty door handle assemblies, but Ford will replace all those affected at no charge. <br /><br />The second recall, which involves 57,000 E-Series full-size vans and 2007 Expeditions and Navigators with the 5.4L V8, is a bit more serious. The defective part is the engine's fuel rail crossover hose, which could crack and leak, potentially causing a fire. Again, no reports of injuries or accidents have been associated with the defective hose and dealers will replace them at no charge. If you've got an affected vehicle for either recall, contact your dealer ASAP and set up an appointment to have the parts in question replaced.<br /><br />[Source: The Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/ford-recalling-180-000-vans-and-suvs-for-two-issues/">Ford recalling 180,000 vans and SUVs for two issues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080211/BIZ/802110442/1148/AUTO01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/ford-recalling-180-000-vans-and-suvs-for-two-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1112198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/ford-recalling-180-000-vans-and-suvs-for-two-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford recall</category><category>ford suv recall</category><category>ford van recall</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>FordSuvRecall</category><category>FordVanRecall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:51:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1112198/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/02/11/ford-recalling-180-000-vans-and-suvs-for-two-issues/1112198/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1112198</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/08expd_ltd_c8021_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford to recall 1.2 million trucks, SUVs and vans]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/06/ford-to-recall-1-2-million-trucks-suvs-and-vans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/06/ford-to-recall-1-2-million-trucks-suvs-and-vans/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/06/ford-to-recall-1-2-million-trucks-suvs-and-vans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071206/UPDATE/712060463/1148/AUTO01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/fordtrucksf450.jpg" /></a><br /><br /> Ford will be recalling 1.2 million trucks, SUVs and vans due to a faulty engine sensor. The recall affects vehicles of from 1997 through 2003 that are equipped with the 7.3L Power Stroke diesel engine. This diesel motor actually came before the dreaded 6.0L diesel from International/Navistar that was known for its unreliability. Though also built by Navistar, the 7.3L is actually considered to be quite bulletproof. The recall, however, encompasses F-series Super Duty pickups, Excursion SUVs and E-series vans that were equipped with the 7.3L diesel. The sensor in question is the engine's camshaft position sensor. Over time the part can apparently degrade leading to engine stall, potentially causing an accident if the vehicle is moving. Ford claims it's aware of 14 accidents or instances of drivers losing control of their vehicle related to this issue, which we'd say is about 14 too many. Customers with possibly affected vehicles will be notified beginning December 17th for a free repair. <br /><br />[Source: Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/06/ford-to-recall-1-2-million-trucks-suvs-and-vans/">Ford to recall 1.2 million trucks, SUVs and vans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071206/UPDATE/712060463/1148/AUTO01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/06/ford-to-recall-1-2-million-trucks-suvs-and-vans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1056601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/06/ford-to-recall-1-2-million-trucks-suvs-and-vans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>ford recall</category><category>ford recall 7.3</category><category>ford recall diesel</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>FordRecall7.3</category><category>FordRecallDiesel</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Merritt Johnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1056601/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/12/06/ford-to-recall-1-2-million-trucks-suvs-and-vans/1056601/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1056601</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/fordtrucksf450_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford says parts for cruise control recall delayed]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071017/UPDATE/710170478/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/2000fordtaurus-03.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Hang on just a little longer if you've got a Ford with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/ford-recalling-3-6-mil-vehicles-with-faulty-cruise-control-units/">self-immolating cruise control</a> option. Since the recall was announced in August, there's been a run on service departments, leading to a shortage of fused wiring harnesses for the passenger cars involved in the effort. The SUVs and pickups haven't had any supply problems, so it's just people with the honor of still owning such gems as mid 1990s Panther platform vehicles, Lincoln Mark VIIIs, Neff's favorite '93-'95 SHO, and everyone's halo car, the '94 Mercury Capri. The only word on parts availability, which was supposed to be October, is that they'll arrive sometime later this year. Plenty of time for your <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ford_platforms">DN5</a> SHO to burn completely to the ground.<br /><br />[Source: Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/">Ford says parts for cruise control recall delayed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071017/UPDATE/710170478/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1015961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cruise control</category><category>CruiseControl</category><category>engine fire</category><category>EngineFire</category><category>Ford</category><category>ford recall</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>parts availability</category><category>PartsAvailability</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1015961/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/1015961/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1015961</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/2000fordtaurus-03_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>