<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA wants to issue larger fines for safety and recall infractions]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/22/us-autos-safety-idUSBRE82L13020120322?type=companyNews"><img alt="David Strickland Ray LaHood"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/strickland-lahood.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 457px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota">Toyota</a> made all kinds of news during its recall woes, with one headline item being the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/21/report-toyota-agrees-to-extra-32-4m-in-fines-over-recalls/">record-breaking $32.4 million civil penalty</a> it paid to the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>. The charge was levied by NHTSA because it considered Toyota tardy in announcing its recalls, and was almost twice the additionally record-setting $16.4 million fine that Toyota paid to address the recall itself. According to a report in <em>Reuters</em>, though, NHTSA Administrator David Strickland believes that such fines aren't strong enough deterrents for automakers.<br />
<br />
Currently the maximum fine the NHTSA can levy per infraction is $17 million. Due to last year's climate catastrophes, Toyota's profit for its 2011-2012 fiscal year is expected to drop 42 percent from the year before, but this month the company <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/uk-toyota-idUKTRE8160D020120207">issued a projection of &yen;200 billion</a> ($2.5 billion U.S.) for operating profit. Having to pay government fines is never ideal, but Toyota's total fine of $48.4 million, when compared to $2.5 billion, probably made the public stoning far more painful than writing that check.<br />
<br />
Carmakers are said to be doing more, and doing it more quickly, when it comes to investigating and announcing recalls. Still, Strickland wants the maximum civil penalty raised by almost a factor of 15, to $250 million per infraction. The language to do so has been included in a transportation bill approved by the Senate, but a House version omits that provision. Republicans - and automakers - have no interest in seeing it added, but unless he's just rattling the cage to keep the heat up, this probably won't be Strickland's last effort to get a bigger bat.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/">NHTSA wants to issue larger fines for safety and recall infractions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20200507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>david strickland</category><category>fines</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa fines</category><category>toyota fine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20200507/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/28/nhtsa-wants-to-issue-larger-fines-for-safety-and-recall-infracti/20200507/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20200507</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/strickland-lahood_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW agrees to pay $3M fine for late reporting of recalls]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorcycles/" rel="tag">Motorcycle</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120210/AUTO01/202100441/1148/AUTO01/BMW-paying-3M-fine-over-delayed-recalls"><img alt="BMW logo" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/nhtsabmwfines.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 250px; height: 247px; float: right;" /></a><a href="http://autoblog.com/bmw">BMW</a> is handing over $3 million in fines to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over the way it has handled recalls. NHTSA began an investigation of BMW's practices in 2010, looking at 16 recalls that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/10/usa-bmw-fine-idUSL2E8DAF4220120210?type=companyNews&amp;feedType=RSS">covered more than 300,000</a> of the company's cars and motorcycles going back in some cases to 2002.<br />
<br />
In levying the fine, NHTSA found that "BMW appears to maintain a practice, by design or habit, in which it provides little information in its initial (recall) filings." Of the instances which garnered fines, however, BMW said all but one of them concerned its motorcycles, not its cars. The NHTSA said that BMW would eventually provide the information but only after what the NHTSA termed an "<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-10/bmw-fined-3-million-by-u-s-for-delays-in-reporting-defects.html">inordinate amount of time</a>."<br />
<br />
To address the issue, BMW is changing its methods for how it provides information to the government and how it deals with recalls.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/">BMW agrees to pay $3M fine for late reporting of recalls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20169611/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>bmw motorrad</category><category>bmw recall</category><category>fines</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa fine</category><category>nhtsa fines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20169611/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/02/13/bmw-agrees-to-pay-3m-fine-for-late-reporting-of-recalls/20169611/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20169611</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/nhtsabmwfines_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: Quebec drivers face hefty fine if they don't drive on snow tires]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/30/report-quebec-drivers-face-hefty-fine-if-they-dont-drive-on-sn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/30/report-quebec-drivers-face-hefty-fine-if-they-dont-drive-on-sn/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/30/report-quebec-drivers-face-hefty-fine-if-they-dont-drive-on-sn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/12/in-quebec-fines-for-drivers-without-snow-tires/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wiredautopia+%28Blog+-+Autopia%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/canada-patrol-car-chains-630.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Ah, Quebec. Beautiful women, beautiful city, fantastic food. But there is a dark side. No, not poutin and steamies. We're talking about the language police! Answer your phone incorrectly, write something in English more than 50 percent the size of the equivalent French phrase or - worst of all - if you forget to bother with French at all, it's <strike>off with your head</strike> an annoying fine. Joining the Qu&eacute;b&eacute;cois language police are a new group of cops - the tire police.<br />
<br />
Basically, according to <em>Wired</em>, if you, a Quebec resident, drive between December 15 and March 15 on all-season tires, you get hit with a $300 fine. But what if you have all-wheel drive? Low gears and a transfer case? A Hummer H1? It doesn't matter. No snow tires = a $300 lighter wallet within the province of Quebec.<br />
<br />
There is a bit of rationale behind this law. Fully 90 percent of drivers in Quebec have historically fitted snow tires to their rides anyhow. And it is estimated that the 10 percent that doesn't bother causes 38 percent of the winter accidents. Quite disproportionate, no? But really, this shouldn't come as any shock. Snowy conditions require winter tires. If this does come as a shock to you, check our recent <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/proper-winter-tires-are-more-important-than-all-wheel-drive/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+weblogsinc%2Fautoblog+%28Autoblog%29">feature on winter tires</a>. And... uh, stay out of Quebec if you're still rollin' on summer meats.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/12/in-quebec-fines-for-drivers-without-snow-tires/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wiredautopia+%28Blog+-+Autopia%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">Wired</a> | Image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/roland/3130803597/">Roland</a> - C.C. License 2.0]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/30/report-quebec-drivers-face-hefty-fine-if-they-dont-drive-on-sn/">Report: Quebec drivers face hefty fine if they don't drive on snow tires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/30/report-quebec-drivers-face-hefty-fine-if-they-dont-drive-on-sn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19298283/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/30/report-quebec-drivers-face-hefty-fine-if-they-dont-drive-on-sn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>all-season tires</category><category>All-seasonTires</category><category>Canada</category><category>canada authorities</category><category>canada police</category><category>CanadaAuthorities</category><category>CanadaPolice</category><category>canadian police</category><category>CanadianPolice</category><category>Fines</category><category>Quebec</category><category>Quebecois</category><category>radials</category><category>Snow Tires</category><category>SnowTires</category><category>tire</category><category>Tire Police</category><category>TirePolice</category><category>tires</category><category>Winter Tires</category><category>WinterTires</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Lieberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19298283/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/12/30/report-quebec-drivers-face-hefty-fine-if-they-dont-drive-on-sn/19298283/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19298283</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/canada-patrol-car-chains-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Booted Bugatti Veyron proof that nobody is safe from the recession]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/booted-bugatti-veyron-proof-that-nobody-is-safe-from-the-recessi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/booted-bugatti-veyron-proof-that-nobody-is-safe-from-the-recessi/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/booted-bugatti-veyron-proof-that-nobody-is-safe-from-the-recessi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bugatti/" rel="tag">Bugatti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lifestyle/" rel="tag">Lifestyle</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/humor/" rel="tag">Humor</a></p><strong /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/booted-bugatti/1488115/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/03_boot_bugatti-lead.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><em><strong><small>The booted Bugatti - click above for a gallery of before-and-after images</small></strong></em><br /></div>
<br />To their credit, the police in Slovakia evidently make no exceptions for &euro;1.1 million supercars. There are supposedly two Bugatti Veyrons registered in the European country, and this one is said to belong to Ladislav Basternak. <br /><br />When Basternak;s Veyron was parked a little too long at the Hviezdoslavovo Square in Bratislava, the Slovak police slapped a boot on the Bug's oh-so-costly 12-spoke wheels. We're guessing that more than one ticket resulted in the boot, but who knows? Either way, that would make this scene a little worse than the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/thats-the-ticket-crowd-cheers-as-veyron-gets-parking-fine/">ticketed Veyron</a> in London, but not quite as bad as the Bugatti driver who <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/14/not-the-way-to-roll-in-a-veyron/">ran out of gas</a> in Las Vegas. <em>Thanks for the tip, Shadow</em>!<br /><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/booted-bugatti">Booted Bugatti</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/booted-bugatti/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/01_boot_bugatti_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/booted-bugatti/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/03_boot_bugatti_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/booted-bugatti/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/05_boot_bugatti_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://natankuj.sme.sk/c/4386901/luxusny-sportiak-nie-je-vynimka-dostal-v-bratislave-papucu.html">Natankuj</a> (<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;hl=en&amp;js=n&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fnatankuj.sme.sk%2Fc%2F4386901%2Fluxusny-sportiak-nie-je-vynimka-dostal-v-bratislave-papucu.html&amp;sl=sk&amp;tl=en">translated</a>)]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/booted-bugatti-veyron-proof-that-nobody-is-safe-from-the-recessi/">Booted Bugatti Veyron proof that nobody is safe from the recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://natankuj.sme.sk/c/4386901/luxusny-sportiak-nie-je-vynimka-dostal-v-bratislave-papucu.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/booted-bugatti-veyron-proof-that-nobody-is-safe-from-the-recessi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1513722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/booted-bugatti-veyron-proof-that-nobody-is-safe-from-the-recessi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boot</category><category>bratislava</category><category>bugatti</category><category>bugatti veyron</category><category>BugattiVeyron</category><category>coupe</category><category>etc</category><category>europe</category><category>fines</category><category>humor</category><category>lifestyle</category><category>parking ticket</category><category>ParkingTicket</category><category>slovakia</category><category>sports</category><category>supercar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1513722/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/04/13/booted-bugatti-veyron-proof-that-nobody-is-safe-from-the-recessi/1513722/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1513722</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/03_boot_bugatti-lead_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Streaming Mad: $206 in urine-soaked coins is not acceptable payment for a speeding ticket in Washington]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/26/streaming-mad-206-in-urine-soaked-coins-is-not-acceptable-paym/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/26/streaming-mad-206-in-urine-soaked-coins-is-not-acceptable-paym/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/26/streaming-mad-206-in-urine-soaked-coins-is-not-acceptable-paym/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/humor/" rel="tag">Humor</a></p><a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/washington_man_streams_his_ang.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/coins_in_urine.jpg" /></a>Michael Harold Lynch was ticketed for doing 54 mph in a 35 mph area that was also a construction zone. The fine was $206. Lynch decided to let his anger flow by placing $206 in a plastic bag, peeing in the bag and sending it in. Upon receiving Lynch's little care package, the courthouse staff gave it to a police officer and declined to accept the pungent payment to clear the ticket. <br /><br />Turns out Lynch didn't break any laws - it's not necessarily illegal to mail bodily fluids. The pee-and-pennies were sent back to Lynch - COD, in fact - with a note that said they couldn't be taken because "the pile of coins emitted a strong, pungent odor of stale urine." Lynch responded by sending a check made out to another agency, which was returned, then he sent a check for the wrong amount. Now he's on the hook for $271 because his payment is late. We wonder what he has in store for <strike>number</strike> round 2...<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/washington_man_streams_his_ang.html">Oregon Live</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/26/streaming-mad-206-in-urine-soaked-coins-is-not-acceptable-paym/">Streaming Mad: $206 in urine-soaked coins is not acceptable payment for a speeding ticket in Washington</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/washington_man_streams_his_ang.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/26/streaming-mad-206-in-urine-soaked-coins-is-not-acceptable-paym/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1499299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/26/streaming-mad-206-in-urine-soaked-coins-is-not-acceptable-paym/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>etc</category><category>fines</category><category>humor</category><category>michael harold lynch</category><category>michael lynch</category><category>MichaelHaroldLynch</category><category>MichaelLynch</category><category>pee speeding ticket</category><category>PeeSpeedingTicket</category><category>speeding</category><category>speeding ticket</category><category>SpeedingTicket</category><category>urine speeding ticket</category><category>UrineSpeedingTicket</category><category>washington</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1499299/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/03/26/streaming-mad-206-in-urine-soaked-coins-is-not-acceptable-paym/1499299/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1499299</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/coins_in_urine_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Texting while driving in the UK could get you 2 years in jail]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drives</a></p><p><a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23411328-details/Drivers+risk+two+years+in+jail+for+using+their+mobile+phones/article.do"><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/uk_texting_jail.jpg" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The current fine for using a mobile phone while driving in the UK is &pound;60 and three points on your license. If you are caught driving unsafely while using a mobile phone or typing directions in the navi, the fine jumps to &pound;2,500. Now, after a review by the Crown Prosecution Service which looked at types of bad driving and penalties, a new charge of "dangerous driving" has been added. That charge would require the driver to be doing something likely to kill or seriously endanger somebody, while fiddling with a device like a phone or MP3 player. If that was found, then the driver could spend two years in jail.</p>
<p>The finding of dangerous driving will be up to the prosecutor to prove and a jury to issue. However, it gives the courts a step between a fine and a 14-year sentence, which is the punishment for the more serious offense of death by dangerous driving. Its value as a deterrent is, of course, being debated. Some say the risk of 2 years in the pokey might finally get people to pay attention behind the wheel. Others say that enforcement of the current laws is so lax that people won't likely pay attention to this one. Any way you care to look at it, though, the UK is the last place you want to be swapping photos and trying to find the right playlist at the wheel. </p>
<p>[Source: This is London]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/">Texting while driving in the UK could get you 2 years in jail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23411328-details/Drivers+risk+two+years+in+jail+for+using+their+mobile+phones/article.do>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/984642/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>courts</category><category>fines</category><category>jail</category><category>laws</category><category>texting</category><category>uk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:34:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/984642/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/09/10/texting-while-driving-in-the-uk-could-get-you-2-years-in-jail/984642/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>984642</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/uk_texting_jail_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Improvements in Virginia brought to you by new fines on speeders]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/22/AR2007062201781.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/virgina_fines.jpg" /></a>So they're not out to break a speeder's bank like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/27/welcome-to-indiana-home-of-the-1-000-speeding-ticket-and-that/">Indiana</a>, but Virginia has created a host of civil fines for speeders that will pay for the state's new annual $1 billion transportation package. That means that after July 1, not only will you get a bill from the judge for speeding, you will then get a much larger bill from the state. Fr'instance, drive without a license, pay $75 to the court and $900 to VA. Do 20 mph over the limit, pay $200 to the court, pay $1,050 to VA. We really love this one: if you have eight points on your license and get a speeding ticket, you'll pay an additional $75 for every point above eight, <em>and another $100 for simply having more than eight points</em>. That smacks of double jeopardy to us, but what do we know?</p>
<p>For the record, almost no one -- and not just speeders -- likes it. Court clerks are expecting to face the anger when people find out about the new fees at the courthouse window. Defense attorneys are getting ready for legal challenges. Judges are expecting people to start pleading not guilty to avoid paying the fees. Which means prosecutors will face more trials.</p>
<p>The "abuser fees" are only for "major" infractions, and only paid by Virginia residents. The new revenue will pay for building roads, snow removal, pothole repair, and grass mowing. David Albo, one of the legislative sponsors of the bill, took New Jersey's similar fee system as a template, and called it "a voluntary tax." After all, "if you don't commit a crime ... you don't pay anything."</p>
<p><em>Thanks for the tip, Josh</em></p>
<p>[Source: Washington Post]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/">Improvements in Virginia brought to you by new fines on speeders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/22/AR2007062201781.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/926588/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fines</category><category>license</category><category>points</category><category>registration</category><category>speeding</category><category>states</category><category>virginia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:34:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/926588/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/06/27/improvements-in-virginia-brought-to-you-by-new-fines-on-speeders/926588/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>926588</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/virgina_fines_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NASCAR Scandal! Toyota, Waltrip in shame, fined big time]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/73334006.jpg" /><br /><br />For those who haven't heard, NASCAR's season-opening Daytona 500 race this weekend has been marred by controversy from the rookie Toyota camp. On Sunday, Michael Waltrip had his No. 55 Toyota confiscated by NASCAR officials after inspectors found an odorless, Vaseline-like substance in the car's engine. Later in the week, NASCAR handed down punishment to Michael Waltrip Racing, which included the ejection of team vice president of competition Bobby Kennedy and Crew Chief David Hyder from the garage at Daytona. Hyder was also fined $100,000, the largest fine ever handed down by NASCAR. Waltrip himself was penalized with a loss of 100 drivers points and his qualifying time from pole day on Feb. 11th was thrown out. Elizabeth Waltrip, Michael's wife and the official owner of his car, was also docked 100 owners points.<br /><br />Thanks for the tip, John!<br /><br />[Source: ESPN.com]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NASCAR Scandal! Toyota, Waltrip in shame, fined big time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/">NASCAR Scandal! Toyota, Waltrip in shame, fined big time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/news/story?seriesId=2&amp;id=2766640>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/755174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>daytona 500</category><category>Daytona500</category><category>fines</category><category>michael waltrip</category><category>michael waltrip racing</category><category>MichaelWaltrip</category><category>MichaelWaltripRacing</category><category>penalty</category><category>scandal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:25:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/755174/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/02/16/nascar-scandal-toyota-waltrip-in-shame-fined-big-time/755174/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>755174</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/73334006_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>