<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers - February 2009: Wish It Were A Leap Year Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/03/by-the-numbers-february-2009-wish-it-were-a-leap-year-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/03/by-the-numbers-february-2009-wish-it-were-a-leap-year-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/03/by-the-numbers-february-2009-wish-it-were-a-leap-year-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/hill_car1ab.png" alt="" />One more day in February wouldn't have done much to salvage yet another bad month of sales for the U.S. auto industry, but it wouldn't have hurt. All of the big automakers saw sales down around 40% or more last month compared to February 2008. Chrysler Co. (-44%), Ford Motor Company (-48.4%) and General Motors (-52.9%) again took the brunt of it, but Toyota (-39.8%), Honda (-38%) and Nissan (-37%) weren't far behind. This just goes to show that the argument about U.S. domestic automakers not selling what people want to buy is bogus, as people just aren't buying across the board. <br /><br />That said, the same brands that sold well in January have pulled out another one in February. The Koreans both did relatively well with Hyundai down just 1.5% (its Daily Average Sales rate was up 2.6%) and Kia up 0.4% in sales. Subaru, meanwhile, was up a solid 1.4% in sales last month. <br /><br />What are these brands doing that the others aren't? In Subaru's case, the redesigned Forester is selling like mad, up 107% last month with 5,978 units sold. Hyundai has an extra 1,263 units sold thanks to the all-new Genesis, but the Accent, Elantra and Entourage were all up, as well. Kia, meanwhile, got strong performances from the Amanti (!), Sorento and Sedona, as well as a 341 new Borregos sold last month. A combination of new models, attractive incentives and sales people who are better with the pitch than the next guy are probably all contributing to how well these brands are weathering the U.S. recession.<br /><br /><style type="text/css"> #comparechart { border: 2px solid #333; border-collapse: collapse; } #comparechart td { padding: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; vertical-align: top; margin: 0; line-height: 1.3em; font-size: 100%} #comparechart th { font-size: 100%; font-weight: bold; text-align: left; padding: 4px; background: #eee; } #comparechart th.mainth { font-size: 75%; border-bottom: 1px solid #333; } #comparechart td.red { background-color: #f08c85; } #comparechart td.green { background-color: #b3e2c4; } #comparechart td.yellow { background-color: #ffffcc;} </style>
<table width="580" height="112" cellspacing="0" id="comparechart">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <th colspan="7">BY THE NUMBERS - February 2009<br /></th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <th class="mainth">Brand</th> <th class="mainth">Vol. % Change</th> <th class="mainth">Total Sales 2/09</th> <th class="mainth">Total Sales 2/08</th> <th class="mainth">DSR % Change</th> <th class="mainth">Daily Avg. 2/09</th> <th class="mainth">Daily Avg. 2/08</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/acura/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/acura.gif" />Acura</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-41.5%<br /></td>
            <td>7,659</td>
            <td>13,084</td>
            <td class="red">-39.0%</td>
            <td>319<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">523</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/audi.gif" />Audi</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-24.4%</td>
            <td valign="top">4,653</td>
            <td valign="top">6,152</td>
            <td class="red">-21.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">194</td>
            <td valign="top">246</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/bmw.gif" />BMW</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-37.5%</td>
            <td valign="top">12,979</td>
            <td valign="top">20,775</td>
            <td class="red">-34.9%</td>
            <td valign="top">541</td>
            <td valign="top">831</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/buick/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/buick.gif" />Buick</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-51.5%</td>
            <td valign="top">6,196</td>
            <td valign="top">12,768</td>
            <td class="red">-49.5%</td>
            <td valign="top">258</td>
            <td valign="top">511</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/cadillac.gif" />Cadillac</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-52.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">4,666</td>
            <td valign="top">9,760</td>
            <td class="red">-50.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">194</td>
            <td valign="top">390</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/chevrolet.gif" />Chevrolet</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-54.5%</td>
            <td valign="top">75,555</td>
            <td valign="top">166,166</td>
            <td class="red">-52.6%</td>
            <td valign="top">3,148</td>
            <td valign="top">6,647</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/chrysler.gif" />Chrysler</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-62.8% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">15,519 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">41,709 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-61.2% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">647 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">1,668 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/dodge.gif" />Dodge</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-38.8% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">46,590 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">76,141 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-32.3% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">1,941 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">3,046 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/ford.gif" />Ford</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-48.8%</td>
            <td valign="top">84,422</td>
            <td valign="top">164,915</td>
            <td class="red">-46.7%</td>
            <td valign="top">3,518</td>
            <td valign="top">6,597</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gmc/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/gmc.gif" />GMC</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-51.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">16,204</td>
            <td valign="top">33,237</td>
            <td class="red">-49.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">675</td>
            <td valign="top">1,329</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/honda.gif" />Honda</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-37.5%</td>
            <td valign="top">63,916</td>
            <td valign="top">102,313</td>
            <td class="red">-34.9%</td>
            <td valign="top">2,663</td>
            <td valign="top">4,093</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hummer/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/hummer.gif" />HUMMER</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-68.7%</td>
            <td valign="top">1,053</td>
            <td valign="top">3,362</td>
            <td class="red">-67.4%</td>
            <td valign="top">44</td>
            <td valign="top">134</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/hyundai.gif" />Hyundai</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-1.5%</td>
            <td valign="top">30,621</td>
            <td valign="top">31,090</td>
            <td class="green">2.6%</td>
            <td valign="top">1,276</td>
            <td valign="top">1,244</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infiniti/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/infiniti.gif" />Infiniti</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-36.8% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">6,359 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">10,068 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-34.2% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">265 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">403 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/jeep.gif" />Jeep</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-32.0% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">21,941 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">32,243 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-29.1% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">914 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">1,290 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/kia/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/kia_2.gif" alt="" />Kia</strong></a></td>
            <td align="left" class="green">0.4% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top" align="left">22,073 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top" align="left">21,988 <br /></td>
            <td align="left" class="green">4.6% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top" align="left">920 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top" align="left">880 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/lexus.gif" />Lexus</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-38.4% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">13,108 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">21,277 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-35.8% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">546 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">851 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/lincoln.gif" />Lincoln</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-41.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">5,633</td>
            <td valign="top">9,573</td>
            <td class="red">-38.7%</td>
            <td valign="top">235</td>
            <td valign="top">383</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mazda/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/mazda.gif" />Mazda</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-30.4% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">16,401 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">23,548 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-27.4% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">683 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">942 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/mercedes.gif" />Mercedes</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-23.5% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">14,199 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">18,564 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-20.3% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">592 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">743 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercury/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/mercury.gif" />Mercury</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-44.6%</td>
            <td valign="top">5,989</td>
            <td valign="top">10,806</td>
            <td class="red">-42.3%</td>
            <td valign="top">250</td>
            <td valign="top">432</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mini/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/mini.gif" />MINI</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-17.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">2,826</td>
            <td valign="top">3,415</td>
            <td class="red">-13.8%</td>
            <td valign="top">118</td>
            <td valign="top">137</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mitsubishi/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/mitsubishi.gif" />Mitsubishi</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-50.8% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">4,484 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">9,105 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-48.7% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">187 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">364 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/nissan.gif" />Nissan</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-37.1% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">47,890 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">76,151 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-34.5% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">1,995 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">3,046 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/pontiac/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/pontiac.gif" />Pontiac</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-40.7%</td>
            <td valign="top">14,200</td>
            <td valign="top">23,935</td>
            <td class="red">-38.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">592</td>
            <td valign="top">957</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/porsche.gif" />Porsche</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-11.5%</td>
            <td valign="top">1,518</td>
            <td valign="top">1,715</td>
            <td class="red">-7.8%</td>
            <td valign="top">63</td>
            <td valign="top">69</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/saab/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/saab.gif" />Saab</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-62.8%</td>
            <td valign="top">482</td>
            <td valign="top">1,295</td>
            <td class="red">-61.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">20</td>
            <td valign="top">52</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/saturn/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/saturn.gif" />Saturn</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-57.2%</td>
            <td valign="top">6,338</td>
            <td valign="top">14,801</td>
            <td class="red">-55.4%</td>
            <td valign="top">264</td>
            <td valign="top">592</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/subaru/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/subaru.gif" />Subaru</strong></a></td>
            <td class="green">1.4% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">13,089 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">12,906 <br /></td>
            <td class="green">5.6% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">545 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">516 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suzuki/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/suzuki.gif" />Suzuki</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-60.3%</td>
            <td valign="top">3,495</td>
            <td valign="top">8,800</td>
            <td class="red">-58.6%</td>
            <td valign="top">146</td>
            <td valign="top">352</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/toyota.gif" />Toyota</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-40.0% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">96,475 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">160,892 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-37.5% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">4,020 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">6,436 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/vw.gif" />VW</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-17.5% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">13,660 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">16,556 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-14.0% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">569 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">662 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/02/volvo.gif" />Volvo</strong></a></td>
            <td class="red">-55.3%</td>
            <td valign="top">3,356</td>
            <td valign="top">7,505</td>
            <td class="red">-53.4%</td>
            <td valign="top">140</td>
            <td valign="top">300</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td class="yellow"> <strong>COMPANIES</strong></td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>BMW Group</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-34.7%</td>
            <td valign="top">15,805</td>
            <td valign="top">24,190</td>
            <td class="red">-31.9%</td>
            <td valign="top">659</td>
            <td valign="top">968</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Chrysler LLC</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-44.0% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">84,050 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">150,093 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-41.7% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">3,502 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">6,004 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>FoMoCo</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-48.4%</td>
            <td valign="top">99,400</td>
            <td valign="top">192,799</td>
            <td class="red">-46.3%</td>
            <td valign="top">4,142</td>
            <td valign="top">7,711</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>General Motors</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-52.9%</td>
            <td valign="top">127,296</td>
            <td valign="top">270,423</td>
            <td class="red">-51.0%</td>
            <td valign="top">5,304</td>
            <td valign="top">10,817</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Honda America</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-38.0%</td>
            <td valign="top">71,575</td>
            <td valign="top">115,397</td>
            <td class="red">-35.4%</td>
            <td valign="top">2,982</td>
            <td valign="top">4,616</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Nissan NA</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-37.0% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">54,249 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">86,219 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-34.5% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">2,260 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">3,449 <br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Toyota Mo Co</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-39.8% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">109,583 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">182,169 <br /></td>
            <td class="red">-37.3% <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">4,566 <br /></td>
            <td valign="top">7,287 <br /></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<em>February 2009 had 24 selling days versus 25 selling days for February 2009</em><em><small><br /></small></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/03/by-the-numbers-february-2009-wish-it-were-a-leap-year-edition/">By the Numbers - February 2009: Wish It Were A Leap Year Edition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/03/by-the-numbers-february-2009-wish-it-were-a-leap-year-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1477499/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/03/by-the-numbers-february-2009-wish-it-were-a-leap-year-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers february 2009</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbersFebruary2009</category><category>featured</category><category>february 2009 auto sales</category><category>February2009AutoSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1477499/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/03/03/by-the-numbers-february-2009-wish-it-were-a-leap-year-edition/1477499/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1477499</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/hill_car1ab_thumbnail.png</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>