<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[FCC trying to open wifi access band for connected cars to other devices]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/25/fcc-trying-to-open-wifi-access-band-for-connected-cars-to-other/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/25/fcc-trying-to-open-wifi-access-band-for-connected-cars-to-other/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/25/fcc-trying-to-open-wifi-access-band-for-connected-cars-to-other/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p>
	<a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130220/OEM11/130229988/connected-cars-may-lose-exclusive-wi-fi-access-band-under-fcc#axzz2LXLX8Cts"><img alt="GM Wireless Pedestrian Protection" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/gm-wireless-pedestrian-detection-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 336px;" /></a><br />
	<br />
	The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/federal+communications+commission/">Federal Communications Commission</a> has voted to reexamine a 1999 decision to set aside the 5.9 GHz wireless band specifically for connected car technologies. Regulators want to allow other <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/wireless/">wireless</a> devices to use the band in order to ease congestion at high-use areas like airports and convention centers. But automakers claim opening up the band now could jeopardize years of work on car-to-car communication. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/alliance+of+automobile+manufacturers/">Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers</a>, a trade group comprised of some 13 companies, has said the infant technology could be in danger if the federal government opens up the 5.9 GHz band now.<br />
	<br />
	Automakers have been working to develop a system to allow cars on any given road to "talk" to each other to avoid accidents and reduce congestion, and developers fear allowing other devices to make use of the designated band could result in interference. But the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/fcc/">FCC</a> says that concern is overblown. Julius Genachowski, FCC chairman, says nearly every <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/wifi/">Wi-Fi</a> band currently in use is also used by other services. Automakers will simply have to overcome that challenge just like other tech manufacturers.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/25/fcc-trying-to-open-wifi-access-band-for-connected-cars-to-other/">FCC trying to open wifi access band for connected cars to other devices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/25/fcc-trying-to-open-wifi-access-band-for-connected-cars-to-other/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20475074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/25/fcc-trying-to-open-wifi-access-band-for-connected-cars-to-other/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>5.9 ghz</category><category>alliance of automobile manufacturers</category><category>car to car</category><category>car to car communications</category><category>fcc</category><category>federal communications commission</category><category>wi-fi</category><category>wifi</category><category>wireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20475074/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/25/fcc-trying-to-open-wifi-access-band-for-connected-cars-to-other/20475074/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20475074</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/gm-wireless-pedestrian-detection-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Gov't unsure on who can establish distracted driving laws]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/09/govt-unsure-on-who-can-establish-distracted-driving-laws/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/09/govt-unsure-on-who-can-establish-distracted-driving-laws/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/09/govt-unsure-on-who-can-establish-distracted-driving-laws/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120507/OEM06/305079983/1182"><img alt="Texting while driving"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/texting-driving.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Turns out the federal government's attempts to create enforceable oversight of cellphone use in vehicles has hit a Swiftian snag: it seems there isn't a government agency specifically empowered with the authority to do so. The legislative boundaries of the Federal Communications Commission end at the phone itself, those of the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> end at the vehicle itself. Neither is equipped to address how people combine the two while driving.<br />
<br />
So, according to a report in <em>Automotive News</em>, what NHTSA honcho David Strickland wants is to have Congress bestow the authority on some agency to make such laws. For now, the recommendations NHTSA drafts are only just that - recommendations. Automakers aren't bound by them.<br />
<br />
Not that it should or will stop Strickland's minions, but 37 states and our nation's capital already have laws - with teeth - addressing the use of phones while driving. If our time on the roads is any indication, those laws are almost universally ignored by police, and we can't see how a federal fiat would change that, but such laws are on the books. Strickland has testified in front of Congress on the matter, however, no one expects movement on it anytime soon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/09/govt-unsure-on-who-can-establish-distracted-driving-laws/">Gov't unsure on who can establish distracted driving laws</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 09 May 2012 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/09/govt-unsure-on-who-can-establish-distracted-driving-laws/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20232534/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/09/govt-unsure-on-who-can-establish-distracted-driving-laws/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cellphone</category><category>david strickland</category><category>distracted driving</category><category>fcc</category><category>federal communications commission</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>ray lahood</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20232534/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/05/09/govt-unsure-on-who-can-establish-distracted-driving-laws/20232534/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20232534</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/texting-driving_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Will we see (or hear) an XM/Sirius merger decision by months end?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/will-we-see-or-hear-an-xm-sirius-merger-decision-by-months-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/will-we-see-or-hear-an-xm-sirius-merger-decision-by-months-e/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/will-we-see-or-hear-an-xm-sirius-merger-decision-by-months-e/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080312/ANA08/304116966/1182/rss06&amp;rssfeed=rss06"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/satellite_radio_ii_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />It seems like forever ago when rumors started about a merger between Sirius and XM satellite radio. The rumors were made slightly more official when <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/19/xm-and-sirius-set-to-announce-merger-of-equals-today/">the two companies announced the "merger of equals" last year</a>. Where have we heard that before? Nobody expected this $4.2 billion transaction to be a sprint, as there are laws with tall hurdles designed to govern this type of business deal, but this conjunction has creeped like an overloaded Tercel up a steep grade.</p>
<p>For more than a year we've been sitting around watching these two companies as they worked on securing shareholder approval (accomplished in November) and the endorsement of regulators (um, not yet). Now we're getting word from Sirius CEO Mel Karmazin that there may be an end in sight. During a talk at the Bear Stearns 21st Annual Media Conference, Karmazin said he "took heart" in recent FCC comments that mentioned that the body aims to rule by the end of March. "The fact that it has lingered this long, it has been interpreted... as good news," Karmazin said. Gary Parsons, Chairman of XM Satellite Radio, added that he was also confident the Department of Justice and the FCC were moving forward "...in a timely manner." </p>
<p>With <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/satellite-radio-looking-for-a-few-good-customers-anybody/">satellite radio in need of some more customers</a>, let's hope they can quickly put this merger in the books and focus on more important issues like signal reception and more varied content.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080312/ANA08/304116966/1182/rss06&amp;rssfeed=rss06">Automotive News</a>, subs. req'd]</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/will-we-see-or-hear-an-xm-sirius-merger-decision-by-months-e/">Will we see (or hear) an XM/Sirius merger decision by months end?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/will-we-see-or-hear-an-xm-sirius-merger-decision-by-months-e/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1138701/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/13/will-we-see-or-hear-an-xm-sirius-merger-decision-by-months-e/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FCC</category><category>Gary Parsons</category><category>GaryParsons</category><category>Mel Karmazin</category><category>MelKarmazin</category><category>Merger</category><category>Radio</category><category>Satellite</category><category>Sirius</category><category>XM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1138701/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/03/13/will-we-see-or-hear-an-xm-sirius-merger-decision-by-months-e/1138701/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1138701</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/satellite_radio_ii_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[REMINDER: OnStar goes dark for analog subscribers on 1/1/08]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/27/reminder-onstar-goes-dark-for-analog-subscribers-on-1-1-08/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/27/reminder-onstar-goes-dark-for-analog-subscribers-on-1-1-08/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/27/reminder-onstar-goes-dark-for-analog-subscribers-on-1-1-08/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/onstardigitalanalog_opt.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br /><img width="213" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="227" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/onstar_logo_1_opt.jpg"  alt="" />If this affects you, chances are that you've already received a letter in the mail from General Motors and OnStar informing you that the analog network supporting older GM models with the OnStar service will be turned off on January 1st, 2008. The reason is because <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/20/onstar-going-silent-on-millions-of-vehicles/">the Federal Communications Commission ruled in 2002</a> that cellular companies could stop supporting their analog networks in favor of digital ones, and OnStar was originally set up on an analog network owned by Verizon Wireless in 1996. <br /><br />GM began selling vehicles with dual-mode (analog/digital) hardware in 2004 after all appeals to the FCC to overturn its ruling had failed. All GM cars and trucks are now likely sold with digital-only equipment. Some GM vehicles produced between 2002 and 2004 may have been equipped with analog hardware that is digital ready, meaning it can be upgraded to accept a digital signal. To find out if your vehicle is digital-ready, <a href="https://www.myonstar.com/adt.os">click here</a> and have your VIN ready. If you do have equipment that can be upgraded, GM will do it for you, including parts and labor, for only $15 if you agree to a $199 1-year subscription to OnStar. <br /><br />Nevertheless, it's a bum-deal for those GM customers with older OnStar models that can't be upgraded, as their service will ride off into the sunset on New Year's Eve thanks to the FCC.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightline/3973">Straightline</a>, <a href="http://www.onstar.com/us_english/jsp/popup/adt.jsp">GM</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/27/reminder-onstar-goes-dark-for-analog-subscribers-on-1-1-08/">REMINDER: OnStar goes dark for analog subscribers on 1/1/08</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/27/reminder-onstar-goes-dark-for-analog-subscribers-on-1-1-08/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1071761/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/27/reminder-onstar-goes-dark-for-analog-subscribers-on-1-1-08/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analog digital onstar</category><category>analog onstar</category><category>analog sunset</category><category>AnalogDigitalOnstar</category><category>AnalogOnstar</category><category>AnalogSunset</category><category>digital onstar</category><category>DigitalOnstar</category><category>FCC</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>onstar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1071761/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/12/27/reminder-onstar-goes-dark-for-analog-subscribers-on-1-1-08/1071761/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1071761</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/onstardigitalanalog_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Nader wants FCC to probe GM's radio ties]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="www.nader.org"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/nader.jpg.jpg" /></a>In a letter to the FCC, Ralph Nader, the world's most visible consumer advocate, has requested an investigation into the advertising practices of General Motors with regard to several radio personalities.<br /><br />The letter from Nader was prompted by an <span style="font-style: italic;">Automotive News</span> article entitled, "<a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070806/SUB/70803026&amp;SearchID=73290650871628">Puff Piece. Rush Limbaugh is one of the radio personalities GM is working with to talk up its vehicles</a>" (sub. req.). The article goes on to detail how the General has supplied DJs, broadcasters and Limbaugh with test vehicles, private meetings and VIP tours of GM facilities.<br /><br />Nader contests that this type of promotion may be against FCC laws requiring disclosure of payments for endorsements. Some choice quotes from Limbaugh include, "GM has a ton of momentum," and, "GM cars and trucks have never been better."<br /><br />Whether or not an investigation will take place is up to the FCC, but General Motors made it clear in a statement that everything they've done with broadcasters is above board and meets with the FCC's regulations.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">You can read Ralph Nader's letter in full by following the jump.</span><br /><br />[Source: Automotive News - Sub. Req., <a href="http://nader.org/">Nader.org</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nader wants FCC to probe GM's radio ties</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/">Nader wants FCC to probe GM's radio ties</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070817/REG/70817061/1170/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/968234/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fcc</category><category>federal communcations commission</category><category>FederalCommuncationsCommission</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>mg</category><category>ralph nader</category><category>RalphNader</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 16:34:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/968234/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/08/18/nader-wants-fcc-to-probe-gms-radio-ties/968234/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>968234</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/nader.jpg_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC lobbied by debt collectors to allow auto-dialing of mobile phones]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/25/fcc-lobbied-by-debt-collectors-to-allow-auto-dialing-of-mobile-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/25/fcc-lobbied-by-debt-collectors-to-allow-auto-dialing-of-mobile-p/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/25/fcc-lobbied-by-debt-collectors-to-allow-auto-dialing-of-mobile-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/04/24/fcc-ponders-allowing-debt-collectors-to-auto-dial-mobiles/"><imgalt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/Cell-Phone-Driver.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0"/></a>According to the <em>Washington Post</em>, debt collectors are lobbying the Federal Communications Commission(FCC) to again use automated dialers to contact mobile phones of debtors. Previously, collectors could use suchtechnology but were banned back in 2003 as part of the FCC's crackdown on telemarketers. Debt collectors arguethey should not be under the same restrictions since their calls are not random, but rather targeted at debtors.Currently, collectors must dial cell numbers manually. The FCC has stated it will review the request.<br /><br />Cellphones as driving&nbsp;distractions have been discussed <ahref="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/breaking-news-yea-right-distracting-driving-may-account-for/">here</a>, <ahref="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/21/breaking-news-yea-right-distracting-driving-may-account-for/">here</a>, and <ahref="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/02/19/silence-is-not-only-golden-but-safer-for-drivers/">here</a>. What's yourfeeling about the collectors' claims? Would there be an impact if the FCC grants their request, or is this a non-issue?If granted, would it open the door for telemarketers and the ilk?&nbsp;(Answering the phone in the fast lane only tofind a bill collector or telemarketer is recipe for road rage if we've ever heard one).<br /><br />[Source: WashingtonPost via textually.org via Engadget]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/25/fcc-lobbied-by-debt-collectors-to-allow-auto-dialing-of-mobile-p/">FCC lobbied by debt collectors to allow auto-dialing of mobile phones</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/04/24/fcc-ponders-allowing-debt-collectors-to-auto-dial-mobiles/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/25/fcc-lobbied-by-debt-collectors-to-allow-auto-dialing-of-mobile-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/611595/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/25/fcc-lobbied-by-debt-collectors-to-allow-auto-dialing-of-mobile-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill collector</category><category>BillCollector</category><category>Cell phone</category><category>CellPhone</category><category>debt</category><category>debt collection</category><category>DebtCollection</category><category>debtor</category><category>FCC</category><category>Mobile phone</category><category>MobilePhone</category><category>road rage</category><category>RoadRage</category><category>telemarketer</category><category>telemarketing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/611595/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/04/25/fcc-lobbied-by-debt-collectors-to-allow-auto-dialing-of-mobile-p/611595/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>611595</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/Cell-Phone-Driver_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>