<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Nearly 12,000 Volvo S80, XC60, and XC70 models recalled over stall concerns]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/nearly-12-000-2008-2010-volvo-s80-xc60-and-xc70-models-recalle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/nearly-12-000-2008-2010-volvo-s80-xc60-and-xc70-models-recalle/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/nearly-12-000-2008-2010-volvo-s80-xc60-and-xc70-models-recalle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/2010-volvo-xc60/#2"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/2010_xc60_630.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><em><strong><small>2010 Volvo XC60 - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
A software glitch is responsible for 11,993 Volvo models being recalled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The campaign includes model year 2008-2010 S80 models, 2010 S60 models, 2009-2010 XC70 models, and the 2010 XC60, all running faulty software in their central electronic modules (CEM). According to NHTSA, the signal from the CEM may fail to reach the fuel pump electronic module (PEM), inhibiting the fuel from reaching the engine even as the vehicle's throttle is depressed. <br />
<br />
Normally, this would just result in an engine that fails to start. However, residual pressure in the system may allow the vehicles in question to drive a short distance before the engine quits... and if the vehicle stalls in certain conditions, a crash could occur. Affected owners are asked to contact NHTSA (888-327-4236 ) or Volvo (800-458-1552), to see if their vehicle requires a free software update to remedy the problem. Full press release after the jump. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/">2010 Volvo XC60</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/01-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/02-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/03-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/04-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/05-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V343&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email">NHTSA</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/nearly-12-000-2008-2010-volvo-s80-xc60-and-xc70-models-recalle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nearly 12,000 Volvo S80, XC60, and XC70 models recalled over stall concerns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/nearly-12-000-2008-2010-volvo-s80-xc60-and-xc70-models-recalle/">Nearly 12,000 Volvo S80, XC60, and XC70 models recalled over stall concerns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/nearly-12-000-2008-2010-volvo-s80-xc60-and-xc70-models-recalle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19153158/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/nearly-12-000-2008-2010-volvo-s80-xc60-and-xc70-models-recalle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Campaign</category><category>Central electronic module</category><category>CentralElectronicModule</category><category>failure</category><category>fuel pump</category><category>fuel pump electronic module</category><category>FuelPump</category><category>FuelPumpElectronicModule</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>S60</category><category>S80</category><category>Safety Recall</category><category>SafetyRecall</category><category>stall</category><category>Volvo</category><category>XC70</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Repercussions of failed automaker bailout spreading quickly]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/11/senate-fails-to-approve-automaker-bailout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/11/senate-fails-to-approve-automaker-bailout/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/11/senate-fails-to-approve-automaker-bailout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><strong><big>Nekkei index plumments, GM retains the services of bankruptcy advisors</big></strong><br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/12/2701882246_7617605209_b_580op.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />Late Thursday evening, the U.S. automaker bailout bill failed to pass through the Senate. The legislation is dead and there are no plans for another bill to go through the process until the end of the year. To quote Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, this will be "a very, very bad Christmas" for many Americans.<br /><br />Over the past day, Senators have tried to resolve the House-approved bill so it could pass Senate Republican muster, but reports suggest that the UAW was unwilling to accept GOP demands that workers agree to parity in pay and benefits. <br /><br />News of the failed bill has already spread to markets across the Pacific, with the Nikkei index nose-diving over 6%. Things on this side of the world are bound to be worse when trading on the New York Stock Exchange begins tomorrow.<br /><br />According to reports, General Motors has got bankruptcy and restructuring advisors on speed-dial in preparation for the bad news and Chrysler has already retained CH11 counsel.<br /><br />Countless economists and industry analysts are warning that if any one of the Detroit 3 goes under, it will spell disaster for an economy already suffering in a recession. Video of the vote is embedded after the jump. More to follow tomorrow.<br /><br />[Sources: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/tokyoMktRpt/idUKTKW00317120081212">Reuters</a>, <a href="http://detroitnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081211/AUTO01/812110493">Detroit News</a>, <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20081211/ANA02/812112862/1200">Automotive News</a> - Sub. Req.]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/11/senate-fails-to-approve-automaker-bailout/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Repercussions of failed automaker bailout spreading quickly</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/11/senate-fails-to-approve-automaker-bailout/">Repercussions of failed automaker bailout spreading quickly</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/11/senate-fails-to-approve-automaker-bailout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1399065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/11/senate-fails-to-approve-automaker-bailout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automaker</category><category>bailout</category><category>chrysler</category><category>fails</category><category>failure</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cerberus gives reasons why Chrysler could flop]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a></p><img border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/chrysler_skunkworks.jpg" />Cerberus Capital Management shot off a nine-page letter to investors outlining ways that Chrysler could sink, while also pointing out that they believe Chrysler's on the track for success. Some of the possible failure scenarios include a nasty recession, an extreme slowdown in the car market, or a further credit downturn. Credit is already looking green around the gills, and the potential for a widespread domino effect that starts with an implosion of the teetering mortgage business would be catastrophic for Chrysler Financial and GMAC, of which Cerberus owns 51 percent. As easy mortgages and equity go, so goes willy-nilly new car purchasing, and we're probably already seeing the results of that adjustment. Cerberus believes that it can weather a mild credit downturn, and even a mild recession, just fine. <br /><br />One way to attain success is to declare it, and changing the definition doesn't hurt, either. Cerberus optimistically declares that there's no need to be heroes to earn a good return on their investment. It sounds a little bit like they're saying it's okay to tread water. Stating that it's not necessary to build Chrysler up, even though that's the underlying hope, Cerberus thinks that just hanging in there should be good enough to earn a return. All of Chrysler's employees must feel great knowing that Bob Nardelli, Jim Press, and Tom LaSorda can essentially just keep the company coasting along until Cerberus sells Chrysler off so it can collect that mythical return. Chrysler's performance is so far outpacing expectations, and the company does have cash on hand. Those are actual, concrete good signs that Chrysler could yet emerge from its chrysalis. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080216/AUTO01/802160349/1148/rss25">Detroit News</a>]<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/">Cerberus gives reasons why Chrysler could flop</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080216/AUTO01/802160349/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1117530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cerberus</category><category>chrysler</category><category>credit</category><category>failure</category><category>lasorda</category><category>letter</category><category>memo</category><category>nardelli</category><category>press</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mercedes admits R-Class was a failure]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/15/mercedes-admits-r-class-was-a-failure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/15/mercedes-admits-r-class-was-a-failure/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/15/mercedes-admits-r-class-was-a-failure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-mercedes-benz-r-class/239094/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/08mb_rclass_hi004_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a></p>
<p><em>click above to view more images of the Mercedes-Benz R-Class</em></p>
<p>That the R-Class has not been the most successful vehicle in the history of Mercedes-Benz is no big secret, but after staunchly espousing its virtues for year, the automaker has finally admitted it. And as any recovering addict could tell you, admitting you have a problem is the first step on the long road to recovery.</p>
<p>Mercedes had pegged production of the crossover at its Vance, Alabama, plant at 50,000 units annually, with half of that staying in the United States. Last year, however, American dealerships sold only 18,000 units. According to Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche, the R-Class "has definitely not lived up to our original plans." <br /></p>
<p>Mercedes is planning a replacement for R-Class, and while it could retain the same big CUV/wagon set-up, the next R is more likely to take another format altogether. Mercedes biggest competitor at BMW, meanwhile, is evidently thinking otherwise with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/13/detroit-2008-bmw-unwraps-the-production-x6/">X6 crossover</a> it just unveiled yesterday.</p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News - sub. req'd]</p>
<p><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-mercedes-benz-r-class/low/">2008 Mercedes-Benz R-Class</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-mercedes-benz-r-class/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/08mb_rclass_hi002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-mercedes-benz-r-class/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/08mb_rclass_hi003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-mercedes-benz-r-class/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/08mb_rclass_hi004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-mercedes-benz-r-class/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/08mb_rclass_hi005_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-mercedes-benz-r-class/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/500783_877819_4288_2848_07c1221_026.1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/15/mercedes-admits-r-class-was-a-failure/">Mercedes admits R-Class was a failure</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080114/ANE02/816708949/1197>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/15/mercedes-admits-r-class-was-a-failure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1086981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/15/mercedes-admits-r-class-was-a-failure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benz</category><category>expectations</category><category>failure</category><category>mercedes</category><category>mercedes-benz r-class</category><category>Mercedes-benzR-class</category><category>r-class</category><category>sales</category><category>success</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engine problems lead Honda to recall 165,000]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070319/UPDATE/703190412/1148/AUTO01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/07_tsx_engine.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />Not long after announcing the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/honda-issues-record-recall-in-china/">largest vehicle recall in Chinese history</a>, Honda announced today that it won't be leaving the U.S. out of its recall roundup. The Japanese automaker revealed a new recall for the United States that affects 165,000 vehicles that could develop engine problems from a sealer material that may leak onto wires in the engine and cause them to snap. Multiple complaints about the problem have been filed at Honda HQ, though none have led to crashes or injuries. <br /><br />The affected vehicles include the 2005 Acura RL, TL and TSX, the entire 2005 Honda Accord lineup (include the Accord Hybrid), 2005 Honda Odyssey and 2006 Honda Ridgeline. There are other recalls being announced in various markets around the world for the same problem, but Honda declined to reveal how large the scope of this recall is in raw numbers. Clearly, though, this is the same issue that sparked the giant recall in China. So, in total, we know this engine problem accounts for a recall affecting <em>at least</em> 693,406 vehicles wordwide, but likely more. <br /><br />If you think your vehicle is affected, you can call Honda at (800) 999-1009 for more information.<br /><br />[Source: Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/">Engine problems lead Honda to recall 165,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070319/UPDATE/703190412/1148/AUTO01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/856046/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>engine</category><category>fail</category><category>failure</category><category>honda</category><category>recall</category><category>snap</category><category>wire</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford earns poor marks on own internal report card]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070315/BUSINESS01/703150442/1014&amp;GID=QREakPL8QaPnQ0wNYNpBWQI1PK3RW8Ef/AFQSJEIhDo%3D"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/57331231.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />We're getting mixed signals from Ford. One week ago the automaker <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/ford-announces-bonus-payout-for-all-workers/">announced</a> it was distributing bonuses to every single one of its salaried and hourly workers, just to say thanks for helping the company reduce costs, improve quality and reduce the ranks. Today we learn that Ford President of the Americas Mark Fields has told his workforce in a weekly webcast that the company earned poor marks on its own internal report card. The poor marks resulted from missing sales targets and not cutting material costs enough in February. We were under the impression that successful cost cutting was one of the reasons for paying out <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/ford-announces-bonus-payout-for-all-workers/"><em>at least</em></a> $36 million dollars in bonuses to its workers. <br /><br />We made the argument last week, and again in this week's <a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/autoblog-podcast-60-enhanced/">podcasts</a>, that we bet many Ford workers would much rather have their bonus money go back into the company to ensure all the right moves are made during these uncertain times and their jobs remain secure. This seems even more evident today in light of Ford's failing to meet its own targets for February. Those many millions could pay for the next niche vehicle that sparks a renaissance, or any number of things that could help save the company. Heck, it could pay for a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/search/?q=taurus+sho">Taurus SHO</a>!<br /><br />[Source: Detroit Free Press]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/">Ford earns poor marks on own internal report card</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070315/BUSINESS01/703150442/1014&amp;GID=QREakPL8QaPnQ0wNYNpBWQI1PK3RW8Ef/AFQSJEIhDo%3D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/853308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fail</category><category>failure</category><category>ford</category><category>internal targets</category><category>InternalTargets</category><category>mark fields</category><category>MarkFields</category><category>poor marks</category><category>PoorMarks</category><category>report card</category><category>ReportCard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>