<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[FF4 gets official name, plot details revealed]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/18/ff4-gets-official-name-plot-details-revealed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/18/ff4-gets-official-name-plot-details-revealed/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/18/ff4-gets-official-name-plot-details-revealed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/fast-and-the-furious-4-gets-a-title-and-official-plot/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/vdpw_450-op.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Our cinema-obsessed sister-site got the low down on the next installment of the Fast and Furious franchise, and since the plot and character development (or lack thereof) will be predictable enough, Universal decided to drop the "Four" from the title, so the new flick will simply be known as "Fast and Furious." But wait, there's less. The plot synopsis involves everyone's least-favorite tight-laced trooper, Brian O'Conner (Paul Walker) and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/03/vin-diesel-damages-s2000-on-set-of-fandf4/">smash-happy</a> Dom Toretto (Vin Diesel) reigniting their feud, but putting bad blood aside to defeat a "shared enemy." The movie will take place in Los Angeles and Mexico, and despite his better angels, the film's director Justin Lin is considering another installment before retiring the series. <em>Fast and Furious</em> is due to hit theaters June 5, 2009. Mark your calendars in anticipation, or avoidance.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/fast-and-the-furious-4-gets-a-title-and-official-plot/">Cinematical</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/18/ff4-gets-official-name-plot-details-revealed/">FF4 gets official name, plot details revealed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cinematical.com/2008/04/14/fast-and-the-furious-4-gets-a-title-and-official-plot/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/18/ff4-gets-official-name-plot-details-revealed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1170002/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/18/ff4-gets-official-name-plot-details-revealed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fail</category><category>fast and furious</category><category>FastAndFurious</category><category>lame</category><category>paul walker</category><category>PaulWalker</category><category>the fast and furious 4</category><category>the fast and furious four</category><category>TheFastAndFurious4</category><category>TheFastAndFuriousFour</category><category>vin diesel</category><category>VinDiesel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engine problems lead Honda to recall 165,000]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070319/UPDATE/703190412/1148/AUTO01"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/07_tsx_engine.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />Not long after announcing the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/16/honda-issues-record-recall-in-china/">largest vehicle recall in Chinese history</a>, Honda announced today that it won't be leaving the U.S. out of its recall roundup. The Japanese automaker revealed a new recall for the United States that affects 165,000 vehicles that could develop engine problems from a sealer material that may leak onto wires in the engine and cause them to snap. Multiple complaints about the problem have been filed at Honda HQ, though none have led to crashes or injuries. <br /><br />The affected vehicles include the 2005 Acura RL, TL and TSX, the entire 2005 Honda Accord lineup (include the Accord Hybrid), 2005 Honda Odyssey and 2006 Honda Ridgeline. There are other recalls being announced in various markets around the world for the same problem, but Honda declined to reveal how large the scope of this recall is in raw numbers. Clearly, though, this is the same issue that sparked the giant recall in China. So, in total, we know this engine problem accounts for a recall affecting <em>at least</em> 693,406 vehicles wordwide, but likely more. <br /><br />If you think your vehicle is affected, you can call Honda at (800) 999-1009 for more information.<br /><br />[Source: Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/">Engine problems lead Honda to recall 165,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070319/UPDATE/703190412/1148/AUTO01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/856046/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/19/engine-problems-lead-honda-to-recall-165-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>engine</category><category>fail</category><category>failure</category><category>honda</category><category>recall</category><category>snap</category><category>wire</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford earns poor marks on own internal report card]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070315/BUSINESS01/703150442/1014&amp;GID=QREakPL8QaPnQ0wNYNpBWQI1PK3RW8Ef/AFQSJEIhDo%3D"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/57331231.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />We're getting mixed signals from Ford. One week ago the automaker <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/ford-announces-bonus-payout-for-all-workers/">announced</a> it was distributing bonuses to every single one of its salaried and hourly workers, just to say thanks for helping the company reduce costs, improve quality and reduce the ranks. Today we learn that Ford President of the Americas Mark Fields has told his workforce in a weekly webcast that the company earned poor marks on its own internal report card. The poor marks resulted from missing sales targets and not cutting material costs enough in February. We were under the impression that successful cost cutting was one of the reasons for paying out <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/ford-announces-bonus-payout-for-all-workers/"><em>at least</em></a> $36 million dollars in bonuses to its workers. <br /><br />We made the argument last week, and again in this week's <a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/autoblog-podcast-60-enhanced/">podcasts</a>, that we bet many Ford workers would much rather have their bonus money go back into the company to ensure all the right moves are made during these uncertain times and their jobs remain secure. This seems even more evident today in light of Ford's failing to meet its own targets for February. Those many millions could pay for the next niche vehicle that sparks a renaissance, or any number of things that could help save the company. Heck, it could pay for a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/search/?q=taurus+sho">Taurus SHO</a>!<br /><br />[Source: Detroit Free Press]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/">Ford earns poor marks on own internal report card</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070315/BUSINESS01/703150442/1014&amp;GID=QREakPL8QaPnQ0wNYNpBWQI1PK3RW8Ef/AFQSJEIhDo%3D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/853308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/15/ford-earns-poor-marks-on-own-internal-report-card/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fail</category><category>failure</category><category>ford</category><category>internal targets</category><category>InternalTargets</category><category>mark fields</category><category>MarkFields</category><category>poor marks</category><category>PoorMarks</category><category>report card</category><category>ReportCard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>