<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[EV owners in WA to pay extra $100 annual fee]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/30/ev-owners-in-wa-to-pay-extra-100-annual-fee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/30/ev-owners-in-wa-to-pay-extra-100-annual-fee/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/30/ev-owners-in-wa-to-pay-extra-100-annual-fee/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-nissan-leaf-first-drive/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/2011-nissan-leaf-first-drive.jpeg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Anyone purchasing an EV in the state of Washington will have to pay an extra $100 with their registration - a bit counter-intuitive, considering that the government generally promotes EV purchases with incentives. You see, owners of gasoline-powered vehicles in WA pay an annual gasoline tax, and this new EV fee ensures that all drivers pay for the annual upkeep of roads.<br />
<br />
According to the new rule, vehicles powered by electricity and capable of speeds in excess of 35 miles per hour will have to pay $100 with their registration, starting on or after February 1, 2013. "$100 isn't that big of a deal, but it's not well-balanced policy," says Jay Friedland, legislative director of <em>Plug In America</em>. "EV drivers really want to pay their fair share," he continued,"but it seems ridiculous from a policy standpoint."<br />
<br />
It does seem incongruous due to the fact that the state offers tax exemptions for the purchase of EVs. It should also be noted that the new fee provides for "evaluating the feasibility of transitioning from a revenue collection system based on fuel taxes to a road user assessment system." For us, it might be a moment of bureaucratic irony, but for EV drivers in Washington state, its $100 more out of their pocket.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/30/ev-owners-in-wa-to-pay-extra-100-annual-fee/">EV owners in WA to pay extra $100 annual fee</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/30/ev-owners-in-wa-to-pay-extra-100-annual-fee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20411337/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/30/ev-owners-in-wa-to-pay-extra-100-annual-fee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>electric vehicles</category><category>ev tax</category><category>evs</category><category>gasoline tax</category><category>hybridcars.com</category><category>wa</category><category>washington</category><category>washington ev tax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[George Kennedy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20411337/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/30/ev-owners-in-wa-to-pay-extra-100-annual-fee/20411337/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20411337</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/2011-nissan-leaf-first-drive_thumbnail.jpeg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM says Washington State's proposed electric car fee has "no merit" [w/poll]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a></p><a href="http://www.thefutureiselectric.com/2012/03/washington-state-to-penalize-ev-owners-oppose-this-now/"><img alt="Seattle night skyline long-exposure sunset" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/seattle-washington-night-skyline.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 405px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> has gone on record to oppose a Washington State bill that would <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/02/15/washington-state-senate-passes-100-annual-fee-for-electric-vehi/">impose a fee of $100 per year on electric-vehicle drivers</a>.<br />
<br />
GM Regional Director Howard Lenox, Jr. wrote a letter on March 6 to Washington State Governor Christine Gregoire stating that the automaker, which makes the <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/volt">Chevrolet Volt</a> extended-range plug-in hybrid, is against such a bill. The state is proposing the fee as a way for EV drivers to compensate for the gas taxes that they otherwise wouldn't be paying. The letter was <a href="http://www.thefutureiselectric.com/2012/03/washington-state-to-penalize-ev-owners-oppose-this-now/">posted</a> on GM's The Future Is Electric blog.<br />
<br />
"A fee which singles out electric vehicles will be a disincentive to the growth of the electric vehicle market in Washington State," Lenox wrote in the letter. "As a practical matter, there are so few vehicles on Washington's roads today that their impact in replacing fuel tax revenues will, for now, be negligible."<br />
<br />
While drivers of the Volt actually wouldn't be subject to such a fee because its onboard generator is gas-powered, GM appears to be looking ahead as the automaker looks to electrify more of its fleet to meet more stringent greenhouse-gas emissions requirements.<br />
<br />
Last month, <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/02/15/washington-state-senate-passes-100-annual-fee-for-electric-vehi/">Washington State passed Senate Bill 5251</a>, which was introduced by Mary Haugen, the Senate's transportation committee chairwoman. The fee, which is subject to a vote by the state's House of Representatives, is estimated to add as much as $1.9 million to the state's coffers by 2017. <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/02/07/arizona-lawmaker-proposals-per-mile-electric-vehicle-tax/">Arizona</a>, Oregon and Kansas are among other states looking at instituting fees that specifically target electric vehicle drivers.<br />
<br />
What do you think, should states enact taxes on EVs to recover lost gas tax revenue? Vote in our poll below, then have your say in Comments.<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/#poll73977">View Poll</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/">GM says Washington State's proposed electric car fee has "no merit" [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20194881/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>christine gregoire</category><category>electric car tax</category><category>ev tax</category><category>fees</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm</category><category>hal lenox</category><category>howard lenox</category><category>road tax</category><category>tax</category><category>washington state</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Autoblog Staff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20194881/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/16/gm-says-washington-states-proposed-electric-car-fee-has-no-mer/20194881/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20194881</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/seattle-washington-night-skyline_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>