<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA to require anti-roll tech on all cars by 2012]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/06/nhtsa-to-require-anti-roll-tech-on-all-cars-by-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/06/nhtsa-to-require-anti-roll-tech-on-all-cars-by-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/06/nhtsa-to-require-anti-roll-tech-on-all-cars-by-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><p><span class="storytext"><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070405/UPDATE/704050452/1148/rss25"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/nhtsa_rollover.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>The NHTSA revealed the final rules on the mandatory installation of electronic stability control (ESC) to help prevent rollovers on all vehicles by the 2012 model year (September 2011). The legislation applies to all vehicles under 10,000 pounds, and was ushered in without dissent by automakers. Carmakers that produce less than 5,000 cars per year will be given more time to phase in the technology.</span></p>
<p><span class="storytext">With their increased propensity to roll over, 90% of SUVs already feature ESC, but only 40% of 2007 model cars do. </span><span class="storytext">Given the disproportionate fatality rate for rollovers <span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">-</span> only 2% of auto accidents result in rollovers, but rollovers account for 40% of fatalities <span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">-</span> having all cars equipped with ESC is estimated to reduce rollovers up to 84%, save up to 10,300 lives, and prevent up to 238,000 serious injuries per year. When it comes to single vehicle crashes, SUV rollovers could drop by 59%, with passenger cars dropping 34%.</span></p>
<p><span class="storytext">The threshold test will be conducted at 50 mph, using a steering robot to swerve the vehicle in a predetermined pattern while the vehicle is moving at 50 mph. According to the NHTSA, the test is severe enough to cause most vehicles to spin out without ESC. Mandated equipment includes an indicator light to warn drivers about problems with the ESC.</span></p>
<p><span class="storytext">Since ESC employs computer-controlled selective braking, all cars must also be equipped with ABS, which is a direction automakers were headed in anyway. The cost to automakers will be in the area of $985 million, but the cost-per-vehicle will only be $111, a small premium for a life saved. The cost of property damage is also </span><span class="storytext">expected to drop by up to $450 million per year. </span></p>
<p><span class="storytext">One glaring weak spot is the roof. While the NHTSA has been reviewing roof strength since the '90s, proposals have been opposed by safety advocates as too weak and manufacturers as too strong.</span></p>
<p><span class="storytext">Exceptions to always-on ESC could off-road vehicles, use on track days, driving in deep snow, and mismatched tire sizes (e.g., using a spacesaver spare). </span><span class="storytext"><span class="storytext">Ford and GM have indicated they expect to beat the mandatory deadline by a year.</span></span></p>
<p><span class="storytext"><span class="storytext">[Source: Detroit News]</span></span></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/06/nhtsa-to-require-anti-roll-tech-on-all-cars-by-2012/">NHTSA to require anti-roll tech on all cars by 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070405/UPDATE/704050452/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/06/nhtsa-to-require-anti-roll-tech-on-all-cars-by-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/868565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/06/nhtsa-to-require-anti-roll-tech-on-all-cars-by-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abs</category><category>esc</category><category>legislation</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>rollover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler Aspen sports Trailer Sway Control]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/chrysler-aspen-sports-trailer-sway-control/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/chrysler-aspen-sports-trailer-sway-control/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/chrysler-aspen-sports-trailer-sway-control/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a></p><p><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/09-20-2006/0004436540&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/apsen.jpg" id="vimage_1" /></a></p>
<p>The headline of Chrysler's press release pretty much says it: "<!--StartFragment -->Chrysler's First SUV is Industry's First Full-Size SUV With Trailer Sway Control." Many automakers have loaded up their SUVs with ways to make hauling trailers easier and safer, like General Motors' Quadra-Steer technology (which unfortunately went by the wayside starting with the 2006 model year), but Chrysler claims that this innovation is the first of its kind. </p>
<p>Like Electronic Stability Control, sensors monitor a driver's intended path and compare that with what the vehicle is actually doing. When the trailer following the vehicle starts to sway, the sensors gauge whether the sway is as a result of the driver's intended steering input, and if not, engages the opposing front brake to counteract the sway. When the sway continues on the other side of the vehicle, the other front brake is applied, eventually eliminating the problem. </p>
<p>The Aspen hit the floor of the North American International Auto Show earlier this year with mixed reviews -- many critics thought the beast was ugly and represented a bad move for Chrysler as SUV sales tanked thanks to high gas prices. Chrysler dealers were clamoring for an SUV, however, and the sharp interior, distinctive Chrysler styling (complete with Crossfire-esque ridges on the hood) and high level of utility may go a long way in giving Chrysler the edge it needs to make a profit comeback for the second half of the year. </p>
<p>Trailer Sway Control will also be extended to the Aspen's stable mate, the 2007 Dodge Durango.</p>
<p>[Source: Chrysler]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/chrysler-aspen-sports-trailer-sway-control/">Chrysler Aspen sports Trailer Sway Control</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/09-20-2006/0004436540&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/chrysler-aspen-sports-trailer-sway-control/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/672576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/chrysler-aspen-sports-trailer-sway-control/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler aspen</category><category>ChryslerAspen</category><category>dodge durango</category><category>DodgeDurango</category><category>electronic stability control</category><category>ElectronicStabilityControl</category><category>esc</category><category>sway control</category><category>SwayControl</category><category>trailer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DOT, NHTSA release full proposal for mandatory electronic stability control]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/15/dot-nhtsa-release-full-proposal-for-mandatory-electronic-stabil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/15/dot-nhtsa-release-full-proposal-for-mandatory-electronic-stabil/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/15/dot-nhtsa-release-full-proposal-for-mandatory-electronic-stabil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/rollover.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/11/stability-control-could-become-required-by-law/">Monday's rumor</a> became reality Thursday when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released its proposal to require auto manufacturers to install electronic stability control as a standard feature in all new cars.<br /><br />Standard equipment ESC would be required on passenger vehicles under 10,000 pounds starting with the 2009 model year. All new vehicles would be required to have ESC by the 2012 model year (September 2011).<br /><br />The agency estimates that ESC will save between 5,300 and 10,300 lives annually and prevent between 168,000 and 252,000 injuries. The cost of adding ESC to an ABS-equipped vehicle is estimated to be $111.<br /><br />The agency has been urging automakers to voluntarily add ESC to their vehicles since 2004, and almost 29 percent of 2006 light vehicles are ESC-equipped. With various manufacturers already announcing their intent to broaden the availability of ESC in their model ranges, the installation rate without the proposed regulation would increase to 71 percent in 2011.<br /><br />NHTSA will allow exceptions to the new rule "for some vehicles manufactured in stages or by small volume manufacturers." In addition, an ESC "on/off" switch will be permitted to allow the driver to disable the system for special circumstances like track days, driving in deep snow and driving with mismatched tire sizes (a spacesaver spare, for example).<br /><br />A new safety regulation naturally requires a new test, and the ESC will be tested using a steering robot to swerve the vehicle in a predetermined pattern while the vehicle is moving at 50 mph. According to the NHTSA, the test is severe enough to cause most vehicles to spin out without ESC.<br /><br />You can download the proposed regulation and the background information <a href="http://www.safercar.gov/esc/Rule.pdf">here </a>(pdf file).<br /><br />[Source: NHTSA]<br /><br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/15/dot-nhtsa-release-full-proposal-for-mandatory-electronic-stabil/">DOT, NHTSA release full proposal for mandatory electronic stability control</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/portal/site/nhtsa/template.MAXIMIZE/menuitem.f2217bee37fb302f6d7c121046108a0c/?javax.portlet.tpst=1e51531b2220b0f8ea14201046108a0c_ws_MX&amp;javax.portlet.prp_1e51531b2220b0f8ea14201046108a0c_viewID=detail_view&amp;javax.portlet.begCacheT>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/15/dot-nhtsa-release-full-proposal-for-mandatory-electronic-stabil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/669393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/15/dot-nhtsa-release-full-proposal-for-mandatory-electronic-stabil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dot</category><category>electronic stability control</category><category>esc</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>rollover</category><category>rollover protection</category><category>RolloverProtection</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai: he who dies with the most vehicles equipped with electronic stability control wins]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/16/hyundai-he-who-dies-with-the-most-vehicles-equipped-with-electr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/16/hyundai-he-who-dies-with-the-most-vehicles-equipped-with-electr/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/16/hyundai-he-who-dies-with-the-most-vehicles-equipped-with-electr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><p><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/06-15-2006/0004381430&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/big-hyundai-logo.gif" id="vimage_1" /></a>Hyundai put out a press release yesterday touting the following headline:</p>
<p>"Hyundai Puts More Vehicles With Standard Electronic Stability on the Road Than Audi, BMW, Infiniti, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche or Volvo"</p>
<p>It is interesting to note that Hyundai sells more cars than some of&nbsp;the other companies mentioned, but considering this week's news that Electronic Stability Control (ESC) is the new black of safety components, this news is some strong stuff.<strong>&nbsp;</strong>The company says it will sell 350,000 units equipped standard with ESC, which is more than the aforementioned automakers expect to produce this year.</p>
<p>Hyundai's angle is one that promotes safety and ESC as something affordable for everyone;&nbsp;a commitment that is shown by the 70 percent of Hyundai's lineup leaving the factory with the technology. The vehicles incorporating the technology as standard equipment include the Sonata, Tucson, Santa Fe, Entourage, and<br />Azera, all of which start between $18,000 and $25,000.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/16/hyundai-he-who-dies-with-the-most-vehicles-equipped-with-electr/">Hyundai: he who dies with the most vehicles equipped with electronic stability control wins</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/06-15-2006/0004381430&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/16/hyundai-he-who-dies-with-the-most-vehicles-equipped-with-electr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/633849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/16/hyundai-he-who-dies-with-the-most-vehicles-equipped-with-electr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>electronic stability control</category><category>ElectronicStabilityControl</category><category>ESC</category><category>hyundai</category><category>safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Flipped off! 2006 SUV rollover resistance improves greatly, says NHTSA]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/rollover-beethoven-2006-model-year-suv-safety-improves-greatly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/rollover-beethoven-2006-model-year-suv-safety-improves-greatly/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/rollover-beethoven-2006-model-year-suv-safety-improves-greatly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a></p><p><a href="http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/11193/suv-rollover-performance-improves.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/XC90-rollover-test-resized.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>According to a new National Highway Traffic Safety Administration brief, SUVs are getting smarter about turning turtle. By its count, around seven out of every ten SUVs contain electronic stability control programs, reducing the likelihood of rollovers. In fact, nearly 70 percent of 2006 model year SUVs have it as standard fit-an impressive leap over last year's 43 percent. In fact, this bit of silicon trickery has led to no fewer than 39 models obtaining a four star rollover resistance rating. Of course, the increasing crop of car-based crossovers (and their attendant lower centers of gravity) likely has something to do with the higher scores as well.</p>
<p>Among this year's four-star class: Chevrolet's HHR (inexplicably classified as an SUV due to its flat load floor), Hyundai Tucson, Honda Pilot, and Suzuki's Grand Vitara, which is currently rolling around in the Autoblog Garage.</p>
<p>Chief SUV rollover risk were the Nissan Xterra 4x4 (25 percent chance of rollover), Chevrolet Tahoe 4x2 and Hummer H3 (24 percent chance)... but even these rated well enough to obtain three-star ratings.</p>
<p>Check out the link for more results.</p>
<p>[Sources: Car &amp; Driver; Volvo]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/rollover-beethoven-2006-model-year-suv-safety-improves-greatly/">Flipped off! 2006 SUV rollover resistance improves greatly, says NHTSA</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/11193/suv-rollover-performance-improves.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/rollover-beethoven-2006-model-year-suv-safety-improves-greatly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/623727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/01/rollover-beethoven-2006-model-year-suv-safety-improves-greatly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>ESC</category><category>Grand Vitara</category><category>GrandVitara</category><category>H3</category><category>HHR</category><category>Nhtsa</category><category>Rollover</category><category>rollover test</category><category>RolloverTest</category><category>stability control</category><category>StabilityControl</category><category>SUV</category><category>SUV Safety</category><category>SuvSafety</category><category>Tahoe</category><category>Tucson</category><category>XTerra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:03:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>