<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA investigating Mini Cooper S over engine fires]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/nhtsa-investigating-mini-cooper-s-over-engine-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/nhtsa-investigating-mini-cooper-s-over-engine-fires/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/nhtsa-investigating-mini-cooper-s-over-engine-fires/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-2008-mini-cooper-s-jcw/"><img alt="2008 Mini Cooper S JCW" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/2008-mini-cooper-s-jcw.jpg" style="margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 417px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini">Mini</a> and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> have announced an investigation into certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini/cooper">Cooper S</a> models after reports of engine fires on at least 12 vehicles, five of which resulted in a total loss. Interestingly enough, Bloomberg reports that in eight of those cases, the fires occurred while the vehicles were parked and turned off.<br />
<br />
At this point, the investigation covers around 36,000 2007 and 2008 model year Mini Cooper S models. A spokesperson with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">NHTSA</a> said that the complaints indicate a growing trend and that most of the reports have occurred within the last year.<br />
<br />
Neither Mini nor the automaker's parent company, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw">BMW</a>, have commented on the investigation at this time.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/nhtsa-investigating-mini-cooper-s-over-engine-fires/">NHTSA investigating Mini Cooper S over engine fires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/nhtsa-investigating-mini-cooper-s-over-engine-fires/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20083521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/nhtsa-investigating-mini-cooper-s-over-engine-fires/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cooper</category><category>cooper engine fire</category><category>cooper s</category><category>cooper s engine fire</category><category>engine fire</category><category>mini</category><category>mini cooper</category><category>mini cooper s</category><category>mini cooper s engine fire</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20083521/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/10/17/nhtsa-investigating-mini-cooper-s-over-engine-fires/20083521/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20083521</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/2008-mini-cooper-s-jcw_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM recalling 1.4 million passenger cars over potential engine fires]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/2003-pontiac-grand-prix-gt-580.jpg" /></a><br /><br />The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has just announced a major recall covering nearly 1.5 million General Motors passenger cars from the late 90's and early 2000s. The recall affects various Buick, Chevrolet, Oldsmobile, and Pontiac models equipped with normally aspirated versions of GM's much-utilized 3800 3.8-liter V6.<br /><br />Apparently, some of these engines can drop oil onto the exhaust manifold during hard braking. If that manifold has gotten hot enough and the oil dribbles below the heat shield, it can start a small fire. The flames can then engulf the plastic spark plug wire channel, potentially resulting in a full-on engine compartment fire.<span style="font-style: italic;"><br /><br /></span>The fix? Dealer service departments will be asked to remove said spark plug wire retention channel from the front of the engine bay, and then retrofit two new retainers. <br /><br /><strong>Models Affected:</strong><br /><br />1997-2003 Buick Regal<br />2000-2003 Chevrolet Impala<br />1998-1999 Chevrolet Lumina<br />1998-2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo<br />1998-1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue<br />1997-2003 Pontiac Grand Prix<br /><br />The recall is slated to begin in May. Official NHTSA Release <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/">after the jump</a>.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=09V116&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=email">NHTSA</a>]<span style="font-style: italic;"></span><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalling 1.4 million passenger cars over potential engine fires</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/">GM recalling 1.4 million passenger cars over potential engine fires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1515491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buick</category><category>Buick Regal</category><category>BuickRegal</category><category>Chevrolet</category><category>Chevrolet Impala</category><category>Chevrolet Lumina</category><category>ChevroletImpala</category><category>ChevroletLumina</category><category>Chevy</category><category>engine fire</category><category>EngineFire</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Grand Prix</category><category>GrandPrix</category><category>Impala</category><category>Intrigue</category><category>Lumina</category><category>Monte Carlo</category><category>MonteCarlo</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>Olds</category><category>Oldsmobile</category><category>Oldsmobile Intrigue</category><category>OldsmobileIntrigue</category><category>Pontiac</category><category>Pontiac Grand Prix</category><category>PontiacGrandPrix</category><category>recall</category><category>Regal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:56:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1515491/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/04/13/gm-to-recall-1-4-million-passenger-cars-over-potential-engine-fi/1515491/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1515491</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/2003-pontiac-grand-prix-gt-580_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA investigating 2.7 million GM vehicles over engine fires]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hummer/" rel="tag">Hummer</a></p><a href="http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/06/nhtsa_gm_fire.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/x07gm_yu006_450-op.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Way back in February, the NHTSA began <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nhtsa-investigating-gm-suv-fires/">investigating</a> certain full-size trucks and SUVs from General Motors for the possibility of their engines spontaneously combusting, even when the ignition key is in the 'off' position. At that time, the investigation covered some 423,000 vehicles, and GM seemed pretty confident that the issue would not be widespread. Yeah, it appears as if the General was a little off in that assessment. The engine fire issue may now affect about 2.7 million vehicles, including all of the latest Chevrolet, GMC and HUMMER full-size models. <br /><br />A preliminary examination of the electric systems throughout these vehicles is being conducted at this time. Depending on the results of the NHTSA's 'Engineering Analysis', a recall could follow. So far, there exists 41 reported cases of non-crash-related underhood fires, with 16 of those supposedly with the ignition turned off. Check after the jump for a complete list of all the possibly affected vehicles.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/06/nhtsa_gm_fire.html">Consumer Affairs</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NHTSA investigating 2.7 million GM vehicles over engine fires</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/">NHTSA investigating 2.7 million GM vehicles over engine fires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/06/nhtsa_gm_fire.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1229442/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevy</category><category>chevy fires</category><category>ChevyFires</category><category>engine fire</category><category>engine fires</category><category>EngineFire</category><category>EngineFires</category><category>fire</category><category>fires</category><category>gm</category><category>gm fires</category><category>gmc fire</category><category>gmc fires</category><category>GmcFire</category><category>GmcFires</category><category>GmFires</category><category>hummer fire</category><category>hummer fires</category><category>HummerFire</category><category>HummerFires</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1229442/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/06/18/nhtsa-investigating-2-7-million-gm-vehicles-over-engine-fires/1229442/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1229442</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/x07gm_yu006_450-op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford says parts for cruise control recall delayed]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071017/UPDATE/710170478/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/2000fordtaurus-03.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Hang on just a little longer if you've got a Ford with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/03/ford-recalling-3-6-mil-vehicles-with-faulty-cruise-control-units/">self-immolating cruise control</a> option. Since the recall was announced in August, there's been a run on service departments, leading to a shortage of fused wiring harnesses for the passenger cars involved in the effort. The SUVs and pickups haven't had any supply problems, so it's just people with the honor of still owning such gems as mid 1990s Panther platform vehicles, Lincoln Mark VIIIs, Neff's favorite '93-'95 SHO, and everyone's halo car, the '94 Mercury Capri. The only word on parts availability, which was supposed to be October, is that they'll arrive sometime later this year. Plenty of time for your <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ford_platforms">DN5</a> SHO to burn completely to the ground.<br /><br />[Source: Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/">Ford says parts for cruise control recall delayed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071017/UPDATE/710170478/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1015961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cruise control</category><category>CruiseControl</category><category>engine fire</category><category>EngineFire</category><category>Ford</category><category>ford recall</category><category>FordRecall</category><category>parts availability</category><category>PartsAvailability</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1015961/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/10/18/ford-says-parts-for-cruise-control-recall-delayed/1015961/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1015961</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/2000fordtaurus-03_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM to recall over 38,000 SUVs, trucks to prevent potential engine fires]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-to-recall-over-38-000-suvs-trucks-to-prevent-potential-engin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-to-recall-over-38-000-suvs-trucks-to-prevent-potential-engin/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-to-recall-over-38-000-suvs-trucks-to-prevent-potential-engin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.consumeraffairs.com/recalls04/2006/gm_fire_hazard.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/2006-chevy-kodiak.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a><br /><br />General Motors, per the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) instructions, is recalling over 38,000 of its SUVs and trucks due to a possible fuel leak within the engine compartment. Recalled vehicles include the 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche and 2004-2006 Avalanche 1500; 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (pictured); 2004-2006 Chevrolet Silverado; 2004-2005 Chevrolet Suburban and 2006 Suburban 1500; 2004-2006 GMC Sierra; 2006 GMC Topkick 6500; and the 2004-2006 GMC Yukon XL.<br /><br />According to the NHTSA, the 8.1 liter, V-8 engines found within these vehicles use a fuel rail pulse damper retainer clip. The clip may break in some of the trucks and SUVs, possibly causing flames to bellow from underneath the hood. Dealers have been instructed to replace the clip at no charge. Contact information can be found at the link.<br /><br /><strong>Related</strong>:<br /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/13/recalls-announced-for-ford-gm-mazda/">Recalls announced for Ford, GM, Mazda</a><br /><br />[Source: Consumer Affairs]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-to-recall-over-38-000-suvs-trucks-to-prevent-potential-engin/">GM to recall over 38,000 SUVs, trucks to prevent potential engine fires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.consumeraffairs.com/recalls04/2006/gm_fire_hazard.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-to-recall-over-38-000-suvs-trucks-to-prevent-potential-engin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/652474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/gm-to-recall-over-38-000-suvs-trucks-to-prevent-potential-engin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>engine fire</category><category>fuel rail pulse damper retainer clip</category><category>NHTSA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:03:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/652474/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/08/09/gm-to-recall-over-38-000-suvs-trucks-to-prevent-potential-engin/652474/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>652474</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/2006-chevy-kodiak_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
