<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[No Fair! F1 teams lobby for engine parity]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/18/no-fair-f1-teams-lobby-for-engine-parity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/18/no-fair-f1-teams-lobby-for-engine-parity/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/18/no-fair-f1-teams-lobby-for-engine-parity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/70682"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/f2003-engine.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>You'd think that the teams in Formula One would all be striving to eek out every little performance advantage they can, right? Well, not quite. It turns out that some of the teams are lobbying behind closed doors to equalize engine performance across the series.</p>
<p>The development has been prompted by Sebastian Vettel's landmark domination at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/15/rain-supreme-big-surprises-at-soaked-italian-grand-prix-spoile/">this past weekend's Italian Grand Prix</a>. The young German drives for Scuderia Toro Rosso, which essentially - and controversially - runs the same cars as the senior Red Bull Racing team, only with one major difference: the engine. While RBR uses Renault engines, STR is powered by Ferrari. And according to Red Bull chief Christian Horner, the performance advantage which Ferrari has cultivated over Renault is what allowed Vettel to beat out the Renault-powered Red Bull cars, to say nothing of the rest of the field. Horner insists that Renault has obeyed the engine development freeze currently in place, while Ferrari, BMW and McLaren partner Mercedes-Benz have taken advantage of loopholes that has allowed them to find as much as 30 extra horsepower. "We don't need an engine formula to completely open up," said Horner, "but there should be a parity as much as possible among the engine suppliers - otherwise we will all end up with one engine at the end of the day." </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/70682">Autosport</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/18/no-fair-f1-teams-lobby-for-engine-parity/">No Fair! F1 teams lobby for engine parity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/70682>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/18/no-fair-f1-teams-lobby-for-engine-parity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1316011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/18/no-fair-f1-teams-lobby-for-engine-parity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>engine freeze</category><category>EngineFreeze</category><category>f1</category><category>f1 engine</category><category>f1 engine freeze</category><category>F1Engine</category><category>F1EngineFreeze</category><category>ferrari power</category><category>FerrariPower</category><category>formula 1</category><category>formula one engine ban</category><category>Formula1</category><category>FormulaOneEngineBan</category><category>scuderia toro rosso</category><category>ScuderiaToroRosso</category><category>str-ferrari</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Employment rolls in Formula 1 are shrinking]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/employment-rolls-in-formula-1-are-shrinking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/employment-rolls-in-formula-1-are-shrinking/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/employment-rolls-in-formula-1-are-shrinking/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/cosworth.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />The radical rule changes in Formula 1 for 2007 and beyond aren't just affecting the racing - they're having a dramatic impact on the highly specialized industry that supports the most technically advanced racing series in the world. The announcement late last week that legendary British engine manufacturer Cosworth is planning to lay off 40 percent of its staff at the end of the season signalled the beginning of a dramatic restructuring on the engineering side of the sport.<br /><br />Cosworth commercial director Bernard Ferguson <a href="http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=37046">predicts </a>that a wave of layoffs will sweep through Formula 1 as a result of the new rules that have greatly restricted engine development and supply, saying, "Perhaps we've anticipated it and are reacting to it earlier than anyone else, but I'm sure others will follow."<br /><br />The chief architect of those rule changes, FIA president Max Mosley, defends the changes as necessary to ensure the future viability of Formula 1, which in Mosley's mind means slashing the costs of running a Formula 1 team. And that means that jobs must go, with employment costs (the largest expense category for a team) rumored to be as much as $375 million annually for top-spending teams.<br /><br />[Source: Crash.net]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/employment-rolls-in-formula-1-are-shrinking/">Employment rolls in Formula 1 are shrinking</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.crash.net/news_view.asp?cid=1&amp;id=135951>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/employment-rolls-in-formula-1-are-shrinking/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/657055/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/21/employment-rolls-in-formula-1-are-shrinking/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007 rules</category><category>cosworth</category><category>engine freeze</category><category>engine rules</category><category>f1</category><category>formula 1</category><category>Formula1</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>