<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[VW Touareg V6 TDI price: $42,800]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/18/vw-touareg-v6-tdi-price-42-800/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/18/vw-touareg-v6-tdi-price-42-800/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/18/vw-touareg-v6-tdi-price-42-800/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a></p><a href="http://www.clubtouareg.com/forums/f47/order-guide-is-in-for-2009-vw-touareg-v6-tdi-18127.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/11/touar_v6tdi_pri.jpg" /></a><br /><br />A gent named Chris at VW of Langhorne, Pennsylvania, just received the order guide for the Touareg V6 TDI, and the numbers reveal that it will arrive on our shores in January with a base price of $42,800, or $43,490 with the destination charge. That base price is $3,500 more than the Touareg V6 FSI, money that will get you slightly less horsepower but about 150 lb-ft. more torque and about 4.5 more mpg. Options include the Luxury Package for $2,700, Tech Package for $3,350, and Luxury Plus for $5,400. If you want to do something with your Touareg other than go get hotdogs, the rear locking diff is $700, a trailer hitch runs you $500, and you can throw in the silkiness that is the four-corner air suspension for $2,750. There's no word yet on invoice pricing, and it will be interesting to see if people stump up for the premium without getting huge deals on the lot.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.clubtouareg.com/forums/f47/order-guide-is-in-for-2009-vw-touareg-v6-tdi-18127.html">Club Touareg</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/18/vw-touareg-v6-tdi-price-42-800/">VW Touareg V6 TDI price: $42,800</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.clubtouareg.com/forums/f47/order-guide-is-in-for-2009-vw-touareg-v6-tdi-18127.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/18/vw-touareg-v6-tdi-price-42-800/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1374934/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/18/vw-touareg-v6-tdi-price-42-800/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car prices</category><category>CarPrices</category><category>diesels</category><category>prices</category><category>pricing</category><category>suvs</category><category>touareg</category><category>touareg v6 tdi</category><category>TouaregV6Tdi</category><category>volkswagen</category><category>volkswagen touareg</category><category>volkswagen touareg v6 tdi</category><category>VolkswagenTouareg</category><category>VolkswagenTouaregV6Tdi</category><category>vw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW learns buyers want to save money, not planet]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/27/bmw-learns-buyers-want-to-save-money-not-planet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/27/bmw-learns-buyers-want-to-save-money-not-planet/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/27/bmw-learns-buyers-want-to-save-money-not-planet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uk/" rel="tag">UK</a></p><a href="http://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/gb02.nsf/fwPressemeldungFrame?readform&amp;docid=0E4B20BEB10B3BF6C12574EC00591719"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/bmw_dc_surgb.jpg" /></a><br /><br />BMW carried out a survey of 2,068 motorists in Great Britain  and found that no matter what motorists claim to want, what they really want is a BMW. While 20% of respondents said they look at CO2 levels when they research new cars, 75% said they'd only buy a car if they saved money. Which really means they'd only buy a car that slurped less gas than the one in the driveway. Another notable tidbit in the "Driving Change" survey revealed that only 13-percent of people believed that other folks were really buying environmentally friendly cars because of reduced emissions. That means that those Britons know why you <em>really</em> bought that Prius...<br /><br />Fifty-four percent of the surveyed motorists also said that diesels are better on highway journeys than hybrids, and an unknown percentage of them "are demanding premium performance as well." It's a good thing then that BMW has a line of diesels mated to its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/EfficientDynamics/">EfficientDynamics</a> technology that gets better gas mileage, emits fewer emissions, costs less in taxes, and has higher residual values. And in case you didn't know this about BMW, they're supposed to be a lot more fun to drive. If you have a massive amount of time on your hands, you can read the full report <a href="http://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/gb02nsf/(DocID)/0E4B20BEB10B3BF6C12574EC00591719/%24file/081024_bmw_ed_report.pdf">here</a>. Otherwise, skip the words and do your duty: buy that BMW you've had your eye on, save the Earth and have fun doing it.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/gb02.nsf/fwPressemeldungFrame?readform&amp;docid=0E4B20BEB10B3BF6C12574EC00591719">BMW</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/27/bmw-learns-buyers-want-to-save-money-not-planet/">BMW learns buyers want to save money, not planet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/gb02.nsf/fwPressemeldungFrame?readform&amp;docid=0E4B20BEB10B3BF6C12574EC00591719>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/27/bmw-learns-buyers-want-to-save-money-not-planet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1353001/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/27/bmw-learns-buyers-want-to-save-money-not-planet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>bmw driving change survey</category><category>bmw efficient dynamics</category><category>bmw survey</category><category>BmwDrivingChangeSurvey</category><category>BmwEfficientDynamics</category><category>BmwSurvey</category><category>c02</category><category>diesels</category><category>driving change</category><category>DrivingChange</category><category>efficient dynamics</category><category>efficientdynamics</category><category>emissions</category><category>great britain</category><category>GreatBritain</category><category>surveys</category><category>uk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/02/autoline-on-autoblog-with-john-mcelroy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/02/autoline-on-autoblog-with-john-mcelroy/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/02/autoline-on-autoblog-with-john-mcelroy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/autoline-on-autoblog/" rel="tag">Autoline on Autoblog</a></p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><big>I'M LOSING MY BET ON DIESELS</big></span><br /> <br /><a href="http://www.autolinedetroit.tv/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/john-media-photo-3-opta.jpg" /></a> A few years back I made a bet with a former Director of Engineering at General Motors. I bet him five bucks that Americans would fall in love with modern diesel engines and would want them in their cars. Specifically, I predicted that diesel sales in passenger cars would reach 1 million units by 2012. He bet it wouldn't happen.<br /> <br /> Last year I ran into him and he ruefully conceded he was probably going to lose the bet. But that was last year. Now I'm pretty sure I'm the one who's going to lose. What a difference a year makes!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.autolinedetroit.tv/whatisad/"><em>John McElroy</em></a><em> is host of the TV program <a href="http://www.autolinedetroit.tv/">"Autoline Detroit"</a>. Every week he brings his unique insights as an auto industry insider to Autoblog readers. Follow the jump to continue reading this week's editorial.</em><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/02/autoline-on-autoblog-with-john-mcelroy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/02/autoline-on-autoblog-with-john-mcelroy/">Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/02/autoline-on-autoblog-with-john-mcelroy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1331580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/02/autoline-on-autoblog-with-john-mcelroy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoline</category><category>autoline detroit</category><category>autoline on autoblog</category><category>autoline-detroit</category><category>autolinedetroit</category><category>AutolineOnAutoblog</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesels</category><category>featured</category><category>john mcelroy</category><category>JohnMcelroy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John McElroy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are fuel prices hurting acceptance of modern diesels?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/are-fuel-prices-hurting-acceptance-of-modern-diesels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/are-fuel-prices-hurting-acceptance-of-modern-diesels/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/are-fuel-prices-hurting-acceptance-of-modern-diesels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/first-drive-volkswagen-jetta-tdi/1045236/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/22_vwjettatdigarage_opt.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><strong><em><small>click above for high-res gallery of the </small></em><small></small></strong><small><strong><em>2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI</em></strong></small><strong><em><br /></em></strong></div>
<br />Diesel fuel prices are hovering about 20 above gasoline on average. It seems that automakers are a bit worried this disparity could have a negative impact on their upcoming diesel-powered cars and trucks. While it's true that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/first-drive-2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi/">Volkswagen</a> and <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/06/25/autobloggreen-first-drive-2009-mercedes-benz-bluetec-suvs/">Mercedes-Benz</a> are already rolling out new oil-burners in all 50 states with positive results, there remains a concern that there are only so many buyers willing to spend extra to get a more efficient engine and then pay extra to fill it up. At a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on diesel fuel prices today, a spokesperson for the <a href="http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGkkKHA9lI0BMBTHtXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEzZ3RsNnNmBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkA1NTMDFfMTIw/SIG=11gg5rhr7/EXP=1222268167/**http%3a//www.autoalliance.org/">Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers</a> fell short of suggesting what to do about the situation, choosing instead to highlight the fact that diesel fuel is taxed more than gasoline, whereas in Europe where oil-burners are much more popular, the opposite is true. Reading between the lines a bit, it's not hard to see his point.<br /><br />Check out our recent In the Autoblog Garage review of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/19/first-drive-2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi/">2009 VW Jetta TDI</a> to hear our take on today's modern diesels.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080923/ANA02/809239993/1135/rss02&amp;rssfeed=rss02">Automotive News</a> - sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/are-fuel-prices-hurting-acceptance-of-modern-diesels/">Are fuel prices hurting acceptance of modern diesels?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080923/ANA02/809239993/1135/rss02&amp;rssfeed=rss02>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/are-fuel-prices-hurting-acceptance-of-modern-diesels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1322034/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/are-fuel-prices-hurting-acceptance-of-modern-diesels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesel</category><category>diesel car</category><category>diesel cars</category><category>diesel price</category><category>diesel prices</category><category>DieselCar</category><category>DieselCars</category><category>DieselPrice</category><category>DieselPrices</category><category>diesels</category><category>u.s. diesel</category><category>U.s.Diesel</category><category>us diesel</category><category>UsDiesel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW 520d beats Prius in gas mileage]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/23/bmw-520d-beats-prius-in-gas-mileage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/23/bmw-520d-beats-prius-in-gas-mileage/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/23/bmw-520d-beats-prius-in-gas-mileage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/driving/used_car_reviews/article3552994.ece"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/520d_vs_prius.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Readers of London's<em> Sunday Times</em> kept telling the auto reporters that the official mileage numbers for the Prius were overstated by about 15 imperial mpg. Intrigued, the <em>Times</em> decided to test things out by running a Prius against a BMW 520d with regenerative braking from London to Geneva, a 460-mile trip. Then they added 100 miles of urban running to give the Prius a chance to recover ground on its proper turf.<br /> <br /> The verdict: the conventional diesel with Efficient Dynamics beat the full hybrid by 2.2 imperial mpg, or 1.8 US mpg. This means that an executive sedan with all the mod-cons and 500 extra pounds beat the mollusk-shaped sip-tastic wunderkind known as the Prius. And the diesel's CO<sub>2</sub> emissions are just 32 g/km higher than the hybrid poster-child, to boot.<br /> <br /> Admittedly, we find the test a bit unfair -- the Prius is not meant show its muscle at "75-mph into a headwind," and adding 100 miles of urban driving doesn't make up for 460 miles of autoroute. Reverse those driving conditions and then let's see who won. Still, for all of us diesel fans out there, it's a feather we won't mind putting in the cap.<em> Thanks for the tip, George!</em><br /> <br /> [Source: <em><a href="http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/driving/used_car_reviews/article3552994.ece">Sunday Times</a> </em>via <a href="http://www.technoride.com/2008/03/bmw_diesel_beats_prius_in_econ.php">Technoride</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/23/bmw-520d-beats-prius-in-gas-mileage/">BMW 520d beats Prius in gas mileage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/driving/used_car_reviews/article3552994.ece>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/23/bmw-520d-beats-prius-in-gas-mileage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1146640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/23/bmw-520d-beats-prius-in-gas-mileage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>bmw 520d</category><category>Bmw520d</category><category>diesels</category><category>gas mileage</category><category>GasMileage</category><category>hybrids vs diesels</category><category>HybridsVsDiesels</category><category>prius</category><category>toyota prius</category><category>ToyotaPrius</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM bets $69 million on diesel plant in Ohio]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/05/gm-bets-69-million-on-diesel-plant-in-ohio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/05/gm-bets-69-million-on-diesel-plant-in-ohio/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/05/gm-bets-69-million-on-diesel-plant-in-ohio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http://image.emerald.gm.com/gmnews/viewpressreldetail.do?domain=2&amp;docid=43083"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/duramax_2010.jpg" /></a>New emissions standards in 2010 will make things too stringent for GM's Duramax diesel, in its current form, to make the grade. To help its prize student pass the looming tests, GM is investing $69 million in its DMAX plant (a joint venture diesel engine factory in Moraine, Ohio) for plant renovations and new machinery and tooling. <br /><br />While GM doesn't really rate the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/the-us-according-to-lutz-ethanol-yes-diesels-not-so-much/">uptake of diesel in the American market in passenger cars</a>, the Duramax is an engine that has powered its fair share of GM sales. Since its introduction in 2001, more than one million Duramax diesels have found their way on the road in Chevy Silverados, GMC Sierras, full-size vans and some medium duty trucks. The current 6.6-liter Duramax V8 has a diesel particulate filter to meet today's standards. For 2010, GM will add a selective catalytic reduction NOx after-treatment system (along with the particulate filter) to meet the Tier 2 BIN and LEV 2 emissions standards. It will remain good to go in all 50 states. <br /><br />[Source: GM]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/05/gm-bets-69-million-on-diesel-plant-in-ohio/">GM bets $69 million on diesel plant in Ohio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http://image.emerald.gm.com/gmnews/viewpressreldetail.do?domain=2&amp;docid=43083>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/05/gm-bets-69-million-on-diesel-plant-in-ohio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1107011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/05/gm-bets-69-million-on-diesel-plant-in-ohio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010</category><category>2010 emissions</category><category>2010Emissions</category><category>6.6 liter duramax</category><category>6.6LiterDuramax</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesels</category><category>dmax</category><category>dmax plant</category><category>DmaxPlant</category><category>duramax</category><category>emissions</category><category>gm</category><category>lev 2</category><category>Lev2</category><category>tier 2 bin</category><category>Tier2Bin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The US according to Lutz: ethanol, yes, diesels, not so much]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/the-us-according-to-lutz-ethanol-yes-diesels-not-so-much/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/the-us-according-to-lutz-ethanol-yes-diesels-not-so-much/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/the-us-according-to-lutz-ethanol-yes-diesels-not-so-much/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><p><a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/blog/?p=735&amp;DID=RSS"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/lutz_diesel_future.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>In the fuel economy and future tech debate, the hybrid vs. diesel vs. hydrogen fuel cells vs. smaller cars and smaller engines always provokes a fair bit of discussion among Autoblog commentators. At this point, no one yet knows what's going to win since nobody knows how the volatile mix of products, timelines, prices, regulations, legislation, state standards, and gas prices will ultimately pan out. Bob Lutz's prediction is that diesels, at least as far as the US is concerned, won't be much of a factor.</p>
<p>His reasoning is simple: "I think customers are going to say, 'Wait a minute. At equal fuel prices I'm paying $4,000 more for this." Unlike many countries in Europe, the US offers no incentive for people to buy diesels. In the States the price of a diesel vehicle is often more than $1,000 higher than that of a gasoline-engined car, and diesel fuel is just as expensive as gas (throughout California and other states, it's slightly more expensive than premium unleaded). In that case, Lutz's opinion is that just about all the customer will glean from an oilburner is a higher car payment.</p>
<p>Lutz sees diesel uptake in the US hovering at about eight-percent. The technology he sees as winning the day: ethanol. It's clean, it's easy to integrate into the refueling infrastructure, and it "doesn't require a change in consumer behavior." (Except for the people in emerging markets who've seen the price of corn skyrocket.) For another take on the fuel economy battle, <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/01/survey-us-new-c.html">according to Kelly Blue Book, 40-percent of US new car shoppers think hybrids are the future</a>, with just 17-percent citing flex-fuel.</p>
<p>[Source: The Car Connection]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/the-us-according-to-lutz-ethanol-yes-diesels-not-so-much/">The US according to Lutz: ethanol, yes, diesels, not so much</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thecarconnection.com/blog/?p=735&amp;DID=RSS>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/the-us-according-to-lutz-ethanol-yes-diesels-not-so-much/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1099616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/28/the-us-according-to-lutz-ethanol-yes-diesels-not-so-much/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bob lutz</category><category>BobLutz</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesels</category><category>e85</category><category>ethanol</category><category>flex fuel</category><category>FlexFuel</category><category>hybrids</category><category>lutz</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thanks to CAFE, Detroit three (finally) embrace diesels]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/thanks-to-cafe-detroit-three-finally-embrace-diesels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/thanks-to-cafe-detroit-three-finally-embrace-diesels/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/thanks-to-cafe-detroit-three-finally-embrace-diesels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080101/AUTO01/801010317/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/domestic_diesels_coming.jpg" /></a>Diesel vehicles have nearly a 50-percent market share in Europe, thanks to tax incentives and diesel-friendly legislation across the EU. Diesels are so pass&eacute; there that you can buy a BMW 730d and no one will think it odd that your luxury car burns oil. Pull up in a diesel 7-Series in America and people would leer at you like you've alighted from an amphibious vehicle reeking of saltwater and dead trout.</p>
<p>But now, thanks to the oft-reported combo of newly-raised CAFE standards, not-so-newly-raised gas prices, and the 50-state diesel engine, GM, Ford, and Chrysler are about to dip more than a hesitant toe into the diesel game. Chrysler offers a diesel in the Grand Cherokee, but soon all three automakers will offer diesels in their best-selling lineups of light trucks -- the Dodge Ram 1500 is expected to offer a 50-state diesel after 2009. Light trucks are being used to lead the charge since those buyers stand to gain the most with the least amount of (perceived) sacrifice.</p>
<p>Diesels currently have 3.2-percent of the American market. Some estimates put them at 15-percent by 2015. That's a huge leap, and diesel still has plenty of hurdles. Diesels will come with a cost premium over gasoline-engined cars. That should be easy enough to conquer -- incentives and some quick cost and longevity calculations should convince people of the benefit. The real hurdle is the nagging issue of perception. The plan will probably be to attack that with a price that makes the proposition unbeatable. Said Chrysler's director of environmental affairs, "If it's priced right, we can sell diesel here. Diesel can give you an immediate poke in fuel economy -- 20 to 40 percent. Not many technologies can deliver that today." </p>
<p>[Source: Detroit News]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/thanks-to-cafe-detroit-three-finally-embrace-diesels/">Thanks to CAFE, Detroit three (finally) embrace diesels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080101/AUTO01/801010317/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/thanks-to-cafe-detroit-three-finally-embrace-diesels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1074724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/02/thanks-to-cafe-detroit-three-finally-embrace-diesels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>50 state diesel</category><category>50StateDiesel</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesels</category><category>fifty state diesel</category><category>FiftyStateDiesel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let's start importing some diesels already!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/hurry-up-with-the-diversity-training-already-and-lets-start-imp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/hurry-up-with-the-diversity-training-already-and-lets-start-imp/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/hurry-up-with-the-diversity-training-already-and-lets-start-imp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/apr2006/bw20060427_580559.htm?chan=autos_autos indexpage_autos lede"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/CRD.jpg" /></a>BusinessWeek</em> gets a shoutout from us for saying what'sgotta be said (as many of our readers have) -- Americans need to get over their perception of diesels as being stinky,loud slowpokes already. Truly. Part of the problem is the fact that until we get cleaner UltraLow Sulfur fuel startingin October, the stinky part may have some truth to it; however, there's something to be said for the fact that dieselis 30-percent more efficient than gasoline and current oil burners perform near to or at the level of their gasolinecounterparts. <br /></p>
<p><br />DaimlerChrysler is slowly climbing on board with its Jeep Liberty and MercedesE-class diesel models, but we're all about the day when we, like Europe, can buy almost any car as a diesel or agasoline model. Onwards to October!<br /></p>
<p>[Source: BusinessWeek]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/hurry-up-with-the-diversity-training-already-and-lets-start-imp/">Let's start importing some diesels already!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/apr2006/bw20060427_580559.htm?chan=autos_autos%20index%20page_autos%20lede>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/hurry-up-with-the-diversity-training-already-and-lets-start-imp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/612342/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/hurry-up-with-the-diversity-training-already-and-lets-start-imp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesels</category><category>europe</category><category>gas prices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>Jeep liberty</category><category>JeepLiberty</category><category>mercedes e-class</category><category>MercedesE-class</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spy Shots: 2007 Ford Super Duty]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/spy-shots-2007-ford-super-duty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/spy-shots-2007-ford-super-duty/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/spy-shots-2007-ford-super-duty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/spyphotos/" rel="tag">Spy Photos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="153" border="0" align="right"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/07.ford.sd.f34.500.jpg" alt="" />As noted by <ahref="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864">Inside Line</a>, Ford decided not to go with thelocomotive-inspired theme of the Super Chief concept for its refreshened Super Duty pickups due out this summer. Toobad, as the Super Chief was super cool. Regardless, the new Super Dutes will get bigger and bolder in the front andback, with larger, one-piece headlights that extend down to a one-piece bumper, bigger vents in the grille, quarterpanel vents behind the front wheels and the words "Super Duty" branded everywhere it will fit. <br /><br/>The bigger news for the new Super Dutes will be the arrival of an all new Powerstroke diesel to replace the currentone that's been plagued with problems from the get-go. The new oil burner will displace 6.4 liters and employ apair of sequential turbos to help produce 350 hp and 650 ft-lbs of torque. Those numbers would put the Super Duty aheadof both Dodge's 5.9L Cummins turbo diesel (325 hp/610 ft-lbs.) and GM's 6.6L Duramax diesel (310 hp/605ft-lbs.), in which case it's time for another <ahref="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/25/general-motors-demos-diesel-gearing-against-heavy-truck-rivals/">race</a>.<br/><br />[Source: Inside Line]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/spy-shots-2007-ford-super-duty/">Spy Shots: 2007 Ford Super Duty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=109864>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/spy-shots-2007-ford-super-duty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/605754/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/spy-shots-2007-ford-super-duty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevy Silverado</category><category>ChevySilverado</category><category>Cummins</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesels</category><category>Dodge Ram</category><category>DodgeRam</category><category>Duramax</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford Super Duty</category><category>ford trucks</category><category>FordSuperDuty</category><category>FordTrucks</category><category>GM</category><category>heavy duty trucks</category><category>HeavyDutyTrucks</category><category>Powerstroke</category><category>Super Chief</category><category>SuperChief</category><category>trucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:33:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>