<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Oregon considers taxing mileage, not gas]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/oregon-considers-taxing-mileage-not-gas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/oregon-considers-taxing-mileage-not-gas/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/oregon-considers-taxing-mileage-not-gas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090102/ap_on_re_us/mileage_tax"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/mileage_taxor.jpg" /></a>Oregon ran a pilot program in 2006 and 2007 that fitted 300 cars with GPS receivers, which kept track of the cars' mileage. The receivers also kept records of when the cars were on the road, noting whether they traveled during rush hour or not. When the drivers went to several specially-equipped gas stations, they paid a mileage tax based on how far they had driven and when they drove, rush hour being more expensive than the wee hours.<br /><br />Taxing mileage -- as opposed to trying to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/">raise fuel taxes</a> -- is an idea that's not only raising eyebrows, it's also raising interest. Seven other states are reported to be interested in finding a publicly-palatable way to tax mileage. A panel in North Carolina even recommended that drivers be charged a quarter-cent-per-mile for their year's driving. In such a scenario, after 15,000 miles you'd owe the state $37.50.<br /><br />Naturally, the hurdles are many and it will be years before we see anything like this happening -- but beware: it's gone beyond "Let's think about it" to "Let's look into this." States envision working with manufacturers to get the standardized mileage-reporting technology installed in cars. In addition to the substantial privacy issues that would raised by such a move, there's a question of whether a flat mileage tax would blunt the move to energy-efficient vehicles -- the gent in the Prius might not be happy about paying the same as the gent in the F-250 Super Duty.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090102/ap_on_re_us/mileage_tax">Yahoo!</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/oregon-considers-taxing-mileage-not-gas/">Oregon considers taxing mileage, not gas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090102/ap_on_re_us/mileage_tax>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/oregon-considers-taxing-mileage-not-gas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1417345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/oregon-considers-taxing-mileage-not-gas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diesel tax</category><category>DieselTax</category><category>fuel tax</category><category>FuelTax</category><category>gas tax</category><category>GasTax</category><category>government</category><category>mileage tax</category><category>MileageTax</category><category>tax</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:54:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1417345/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/01/04/oregon-considers-taxing-mileage-not-gas/1417345/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1417345</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/mileage_taxor_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Road commission calls for gas tax hike]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lifestyle/" rel="tag">Lifestyle</a></p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28468508"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/mad_maxtax.jpg" /></a>A gas tax is about more than putting liquid into your tank and subtracting a higher amount from your bank account. A gas tax is -- just like CAFE and hybrids and $25 billion set aside to finance fuel efficient technologies -- about reworking and redefining our entire system of private transportation. And since that system is most certainly going to redefined, it is no surprise that the National Commission on Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing has recommended a jump in the federal fuel tax.<br /><br />Congress created the commission to examine the federal taxes on fuel -- currently 18.4 cents for gas and 24 cents for diesel -- and the commission came back with the same results as everyone else: people are driving less, and driving more fuel efficient cars, and that has killed revenue for transportation infrastructure. One member of the commission said, "I'm not excited about a gas tax increase, but the reality is our current gas tax doesn't pay for upkeep of the system we have now. We can either let the roads go to hell or we can pay more." If the roads go to hell, though, guess what? We're going to pay more, but that money will go to service departments and auto parts stores. <br /><br />The proposed solution is to make the gasoline fuel tax 24.4 cents, and the diesel tax between 36 and 39 cents. That would begin to make up for the $105 billion difference between actual revenues and the money needed to upkeep our roads and highways. It is conceivable that a higher gas tax could also encourage people to buy those high-mileage vehicles the government keeps commanding Detroit to make. But before that happens, it will probably just make a lot of people anguished and angry.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28468508">CNBC</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/">Road commission calls for gas tax hike</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/28468508>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1417069/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>congress</category><category>diesel tax</category><category>DieselTax</category><category>etc</category><category>federal gas tax</category><category>federal tax</category><category>FederalGasTax</category><category>FederalTax</category><category>fuel tax</category><category>FuelTax</category><category>gas tax</category><category>GasTax</category><category>government</category><category>green</category><category>lifestyle</category><category>study</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:43:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1417069/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/01/03/road-commission-calls-for-gas-tax-hike/1417069/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1417069</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/mad_maxtax_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
