<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Fiat 500 nets three-star NHTSA safety rating; Toyota Camry and Cadillac CTS get five]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/08/fiat-500-nets-three-star-nhtsa-safety-rating-toyota-camry-and-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/08/fiat-500-nets-three-star-nhtsa-safety-rating-toyota-camry-and-c/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/08/fiat-500-nets-three-star-nhtsa-safety-rating-toyota-camry-and-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/fiat/" rel="tag">Fiat</a></p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/cars-in-national/two-more-cars-earn-top-nhtsa-ratings-fiat-500-struggles-agency-s-crash-tests"><img alt="Fiat 500 crash test photo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/fiat-500-crash-test-628.jpg" style="margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 464px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/camry">2012 Toyota Camry</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/cts">2012 Cadillac CTS</a> have joined the ranks of vehicles that have earned the coveted five-star safety rating from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>. The vehicles mark the 15th and 16th models to nab the top rating under the tougher <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">NHTSA</a> crash test standards enacted for 2011 models. Last year, the 2011 Camry took home four stars in the evaluations. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota">Toyota</a> reminds us that the 2012 Camry is built with high-strength steel to help protect the passenger cell against deflection in the event of an accident, and that the vehicle comes standard with 10 airbags, all of which contribute to the new model's superior score.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/fiat/500">Fiat 500</a>, meanwhile, didn't fare so well under the range of crash evaluations. The tiny hatchback collected just three stars overall. The side-impact test was particularly cruel to the Italian compact, with NHTSA awarding the vehicle two stars in that category - a somewhat surprising result considering that Fiat went to the trouble of redesigning the 500 for U.S. crash test compatibility. The 500 finds itself in the company of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/caliber">Dodge Caliber</a> and outgoing <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/escape">Ford Escape</a> as the only models tested so far to receive the three-star designation.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/08/fiat-500-nets-three-star-nhtsa-safety-rating-toyota-camry-and-c/">Fiat 500 nets three-star NHTSA safety rating; Toyota Camry and Cadillac CTS get five</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/08/fiat-500-nets-three-star-nhtsa-safety-rating-toyota-camry-and-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20123728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/08/fiat-500-nets-three-star-nhtsa-safety-rating-toyota-camry-and-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>500</category><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac cts</category><category>camry</category><category>crash test</category><category>crash tests</category><category>cts</category><category>fiat</category><category>fiat 500</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota camry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20123728/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/12/08/fiat-500-nets-three-star-nhtsa-safety-rating-toyota-camry-and-c/20123728/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20123728</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/fiat-500-crash-test-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Step Right Up: NHTSA announces list of 2012 models to be tested]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2011/NHTSA+Announces+Model+Year+2012+Vehicles+to+be+Rated+Under+Government+5-Star+Safety+Ratings+Program"><img height="324" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/2011bmw5seriescrashtestopt.jpg" vspace="4" width="630" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has released a list of 74 vehicles for the 2012 model year that it plans on crash testing. The vehicles include 42 passengers cars, 22 SUVs, eight trucks and two vans. NHTSA claims the list represents about 81 percent of the 2012 model year vehicles that will be on sold in the U.S., and further claims it will be performing rollover tests on 92 percent of the 2012 fleet.<br />
<br />
You may remember that NHTSA released the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/05/nhtsa-releases-first-batch-of-crash-test-ratings-under-new-safet/">first round of results</a> from its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/">new, tougher crash tests</a> in October 2010, and that first batch of vehicles didn't fare too well. It's been almost one year exactly, which has given automakers ample time to tweak their vehicles in the hopes of achieving that coveted overall score of five stars.<br />
<br />
Of the 74 vehicles being tested this year, we're particularly interested in a few like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/transit%20connect/">Ford Transit Connect</a> (we expect a fun crash video from that one) and a number of EVs including the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/2012-coda-sedan-quick-spin-review/">2012 Coda Sedan</a> we just took for a Quick Spin, the Ford Focus BEV, little <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/i-miev/">Mitsubishi i</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/prius+v/">Toyota Prius V</a>. Other notable crash candidates are the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/camry/">Toyota Camry</a>, which as a 2011 model could only manage a best overall score of four stars after some mid-model year tweaks raised it from three stars, and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/passat/">2012 Passat</a>, which needs five stars to become the volume seller that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/">Volkswagen</a> hopes it will be after a complete redesign and significantly lower price.<br />
<br />
Check out the full list for yourself <a href="/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/#continued">after the jump</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Step Right Up: NHTSA announces list of 2012 models to be tested</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/">Step Right Up: NHTSA announces list of 2012 models to be tested</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20082126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012 crash tests</category><category>crash tests</category><category>national highway trafiic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20082126/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/10/17/step-right-up-nhtsa-announces-list-of-2012-models-to-be-tested/20082126/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20082126</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/2011bmw5seriescrashtestopt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[IIHS tests brace of new small cars, many earn Top Safety Pick status [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><a href="/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/#continued"><img alt="2011 nissan juke crash test" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/nissa-juke-crash.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 630px; height: 390px; " /></a><br />
<div class="iphone_hide" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 10px; font-style: italic;">
	Small cars score big in latest IIHS crash tests - Click above to watch video <a href="/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/#continued">after the jump</a></div>
<br />
Thirteen enter, six leave ... with Top Safety Pick awards. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/iihs">Insurance Institute for Highway Safety</a> spent some time driving (and smashing) a big group of small cars. Six of those cars received top honors from the IIHS by scoring a rating of "Good" across the board. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/focus">2012 Ford Focus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic">2012 Honda Civic sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/elantra">2011 Hyunda Elantra</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/ct+200h">2011 Lexus CT200h</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/juke">2011 Nissan Juke</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/prius">2011 Toyota Prius</a> are all the small-car place to be in the event of an accident.<br />
<br />
This crop of small cars are also quite fuel efficient. All vehicles in the top six offer a version that gets at least 40 miles per gallon on the highway.<br />
<br />
The rest of the vehicles tested faired well. Only the older <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/suzuki/sx4">Suzuki SX4</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/caliber">Dodge Caliber</a> received "Mediocre" ratings in some categories. Every car tested, however, received multiple "Good" ratings. <a href="/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/#continued">Click past the jump</a> to watch the IIHS talk about about the small car crash tests. Also, be sure to <a href="http://www.iihs.org/news/2011/iihs_news_052611.pdf">check out the breakdown of the ratings by vehicle (pdf file)</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IIHS tests brace of new small cars, many earn Top Safety Pick status [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/">IIHS tests brace of new small cars, many earn Top Safety Pick status [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 26 May 2011 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19950944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>caliber</category><category>crash testing</category><category>crash tests</category><category>ct 200h</category><category>elantra</category><category>focus</category><category>iihs</category><category>Insurance Institute for Highway Safety</category><category>juke</category><category>prius</category><category>small car crash tests</category><category>sx4</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19950944/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/05/26/iihs-tests-brace-of-new-small-cars-many-earn-top-safety-pick-st/19950944/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19950944</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/nissa-juke-crash_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA to update 5-star testing process]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/lead1cruzesafetystory.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2011 Chevrolet Cruze Crash Testing - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is set to debut a new testing procedure for the 2011 model year that will make it more difficult for new cars and trucks to earn the government agency's coveted five-star safety rating. Just as interestingly, the recent influx of electronic safety gadgets, such as lane departure and collision warning, will be included in the testing regiment as well.<br />
<br />
NHTSA will calculate one simple-to-understand grade for each vehicle based on how it manages to perform throughout the agency's testing. While the revised parameters promise to make safety-minded comparison shopping between new automobiles a bit easier, it also means that pre-2011 ratings will not be directly comparable to the new ones.<br />
<br />
A total of 55 new 2011 cars, trucks and minivans (including the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze">2011 Chevrolet Cruze</a> seen above <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/">undergoing GM's internal safety testing</a>) will be tested by NHTSA with the new procedures, and the list is made up of both brand new models and some of the more popular nameplates Americans seem most likely to purchase in large numbers next year. You can check out NHTSA's official release and the initial list of what cars will be subjected to this new testing regime after the jump.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing">2011 Chevrolet Cruze Crash Testing</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/01cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/02cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/03cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/04cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/05cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NHTSA to update 5-star testing process</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/">NHTSA to update 5-star testing process</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19573529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 crash test</category><category>2011 crash testing</category><category>2011CrashTest</category><category>2011CrashTesting</category><category>crash test</category><category>crash test changes</category><category>crash test procedures</category><category>crash test regulations</category><category>crash testing</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTestChanges</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>CrashTestProcedures</category><category>CrashTestRegulations</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>five star</category><category>five star rating</category><category>five star safety</category><category>five stars</category><category>FiveStar</category><category>FiveStarRating</category><category>FiveStars</category><category>FiveStarSafety</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19573529/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/07/29/nhtsa-to-update-5-star-testing-process/19573529/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19573529</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/lead1cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Video: Moto Merry-Go-Round yields both disaster and hilarity]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toys/" rel="tag">Toys/Games</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorcycles/" rel="tag">Motorcycle</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/humor/" rel="tag">Humor</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" align="top" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/motogoround.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Motorcycle-powered merry-go-round - click above to watch the video <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/#continued">after the jump</a><br />
<br />
</small></strong></em></div>
Say you and three of your closest buddies find yourselves out for a leisurely Sunday cruise on your <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/17/something-old-something-new-pebble-beach-to-include-motorcycle/">motorbikes</a>, when you stumble upon the old schoolyard merry-go-round. Following an intense session of cerebral activity, and the obligatory drawing of straws, it is decided that all the necessary ingredients are on hand for a primitive recreation of the Gravitron. We know, it can feel like so long between carnival visits sometimes.<br />
<br />
Moral of the story: First, if you are the guy in the red pants, it's officially time to begin the new friend hunt. Second, if you haven't yet found a use for motorcycles, open your mind, they really are very multifaceted. When was the last time you utilized your car to create a backyard, makeshift <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/02/the-first-carnival-of-wheels-is-up/">carnival</a> ride? Wait, don't answer that, just <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/#continued">hit the jump</a> to watch the complete Moto-Go-Round experience. <em>Thanks for the tip, Duy.</em><br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRasoZMirRc&amp;feature=player_embedded">YouTube</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Video: Moto Merry-Go-Round yields both disaster and hilarity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/">Video: Moto Merry-Go-Round yields both disaster and hilarity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 19 May 2010 09:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19472227/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Crash</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>crazy stunt</category><category>CrazyStunt</category><category>disaster</category><category>fail</category><category>failure</category><category>idiocracy</category><category>idiot</category><category>idiots</category><category>injured</category><category>injuries</category><category>injury</category><category>Juvenile</category><category>merry go round</category><category>merry-go-round</category><category>MerryGoRound</category><category>motorycle</category><category>stunt man</category><category>stuntman</category><category>stunts</category><category>stupid</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devon Brozek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 09:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19472227/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/05/19/video-moto-merry-go-round-yields-both-disaster-and-hilarity/19472227/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19472227</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/motogoround_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2011 Chevrolet Cruze: A Safety Story [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/lead1cruzesafetystory.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2011 Chevrolet Cruze Crash Testing - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
Over the course of Bob Lutz' tenure at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a>, one of his major goals was globalizing the production process. As Lutz tells it, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/pontiac/">Pontiac</a> GTO was the first global vehicle born of his labors, with development work being done in both Australia and North America. But the GTO, and its follow-up, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/g8">Pontiac G8</a>/<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/holden/">Holden</a> Commodore, were niche products sold in limited numbers in limited markets. The real test of global product development comes when it's applied to high-volume mainstream products. <br />
<br />
That's were the Epsilon II and Delta II architectures come into play. Epsilon is GM's mid-large platform (D/E segment) while Delta is the compact (C segment) platform. We've already seen the Epsilon II here in America, underpinning the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/lacrosse">Buick LaCrosse</a>, but the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze">Chevrolet Cruze</a> proved to be a tougher nut to crack. One of the most difficult challenges in the global production strategy is the differing safety standards around the world, along with the guidelines imposed by non-governmental bodies like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Creating a platform that can live up to all of these standards without being absurdly heavy is a problem. Find out how GM tackled the problem and found a solution <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/#continued">after the jump</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing">2011 Chevrolet Cruze Crash Testing</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/01cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/02cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/03cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/04cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-cruze-crash-testing/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/05cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2011 Chevrolet Cruze: A Safety Story [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/">2011 Chevrolet Cruze: A Safety Story [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19459684/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011</category><category>2011 chevrolet cruze</category><category>2011 chevy cruze</category><category>2011ChevroletCruze</category><category>2011ChevyCruze</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet cruze</category><category>chevrolet cruze safety</category><category>ChevroletCruze</category><category>ChevroletCruzeSafety</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy cruze</category><category>chevy cruze safety</category><category>ChevyCruze</category><category>ChevyCruzeSafety</category><category>Crash</category><category>crash test</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>crashworthiness</category><category>crashworthiness technology</category><category>CrashworthinessTechnology</category><category>crashworthy</category><category>featured</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>Milford proving grounds</category><category>MilfordProvingGrounds</category><category>safety</category><category>Safety Tech</category><category>safety technology</category><category>SafetyTech</category><category>SafetyTechnology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19459684/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/04/30/2011-chevrolet-cruze-a-safety-story-w-video/19459684/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19459684</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/04/lead1cruzesafetystory_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Pole Dance: NHTSA to add new side-impact crash test? [w/VIDEO]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/pole_crash.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>NHTSA side-impact pole test - click above to watch the video</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
Not satisfied with cars that manage crash forces well enough to avoid spilling your drink, and engines that run so clean they'll barely asphyxiate ants, a new crash test is reportedly coming in the works from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Along with the test will come new dummies and new testing equipment, all of which means it's likely to have a big impact on future car designs. The side-impact pole test will simulate side collisions with objects like trees or telephone poles, a type of accident that current side-impact tests don't accurately simulate. <br />
<br />
According to <em>The New York Times</em>, the new test will use a 10-inch round pole that will collide with the car at speeds of up to 20 mph. A 75-degree angle will be used, and the point of impact will be just aft of the A-pillar. Naturally, automakers won't have to pass the test all at once, the standard will be phased in. For 2011, 20 percent of an automaker's fleet will have to meet the standard and by 2014, the pole crash standard will be at 100 percent - all new cars will have to comply. <br />
<br />
It's a change that could potentially change the face of auto design, the same way pedestrian impact standards in Europe have led to some peculiar front sheetmetal. Materials changes may also be employed to meet the regulation, with additional high-strength steel being substituted. The more conventional metals currently used are easier to form, while stronger metals require all sorts of hot pressing and tempering to be put into shape. Manufacturing cost will go up, which means prices will probably also increase, or profit will decrease while prices hold steady. Safe cars are a laudable goal, but how safe is safe enough? <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#continued">Follow the jump</a> to see a video of how Ford's 2010 Mustang GT convertible and coupe models fare, then let us know what you think by leaving a comment. <br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/automobiles/15POLE.html?_r=3&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">The New York Times</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pole Dance: NHTSA to add new side-impact crash test? [w/VIDEO]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/">Pole Dance: NHTSA to add new side-impact crash test? [w/VIDEO]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/automobiles/15POLE.html?_r=3&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19243922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test</category><category>crash test video</category><category>crash test videos</category><category>crash testing</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>CrashTestVideo</category><category>CrashTestVideos</category><category>ford</category><category>ford mustang</category><category>ford mustang crash test</category><category>FordMustang</category><category>FordMustangCrashTest</category><category>mustang</category><category>mustang crash test</category><category>MustangCrashTest</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa standard</category><category>nhtsa video</category><category>NhtsaStandard</category><category>NhtsaVideo</category><category>pole impact crash test</category><category>PoleImpactCrashTest</category><category>video</category><category>videos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:56:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19243922/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/11/18/pole-dance-nhtsa-to-add-new-side-impact-crash-test-w-video/19243922/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19243922</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/pole_crash_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[5 Stars for '09 Ford F-150]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/f150_2009.jpg" /><br /><br />Ford's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/17/first-drive-2009-ford-f-150-capability-matters/">2009 F-150</a> has garnered five-star government crash ratings and a "Top Safety Pick" award from the Insurance Institute For Highway Safety (IIHS), which Ford says makes its newly redesigned full-sizer the safest out there. Vehicle safety is still largely a question of the loose nut behind the wheel, but the F-150 does come with a raft of safety gear. Acronyms and names abound, from RSC (Roll Stability Control), to K-bags and Safety Canopy curtain airbags, it all helps the pickup earn five stars in front- and side-impact crash testing. We'd expect no less from Ford, considering the F-Series is a perennial sales champ, and probably the most pivotal vehicle Dearborn makes. The '09 F-series has been racking up accolades and these safety ratings are yet another feather in its cap. With competitors nipping at its heels, the F-Series cannot be anything other than stellar, and for now, with the long list of huzzahs, it appears to have met the challenge. <span style="font-style: italic;">Press release <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/">after the jump</a>.</span> <br /><br />[Source: Ford]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>5 Stars for '09 Ford F-150</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/">5 Stars for '09 Ford F-150</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1421606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash rating</category><category>crash rating f150</category><category>crash ratings</category><category>crash test</category><category>crash test f150</category><category>crash testing</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashRating</category><category>CrashRatingF150</category><category>CrashRatings</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTestF150</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>f-150 safety</category><category>F-150Safety</category><category>f150</category><category>f150 safety</category><category>F150Safety</category><category>ford f-150</category><category>ford f-series</category><category>ford f150</category><category>FordF-150</category><category>FordF-series</category><category>FordF150</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1421606/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/01/08/5-stars-for-09-ford-f-150/1421606/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1421606</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/f150_2009_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[IIHS praises Ford Focus for cheap crash repairs]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/maintenance/" rel="tag">Maintenance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe/497366/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/ab-garage_08focus_4501.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><strong><em><small>click above image to view high-res gallery of the 2008 Ford Focus SES Coupe</small></em><br /></strong></div>
<br />Reminding us once again that there's more than meets the eye when shopping for a vehicle are recent impact tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety that measure how much it costs to fix a vehicle after after a low-speed accident. Sure, we're all interested in safety and styling, but we should also be concerned with how much these low-speed impacts will cost to repair. The winner of the testing was the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/19/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe/">Ford Focus</a>, which scored light damage all the way around. The IIHS heaped praise on Ford for designing a bumper that can truly take a bump -- a novel idea. <br /><br />Amazingly, some small cars like the Hyundai Elantra, Toyota Prius and VW Rabbit cost up to a third of the car's worth to fix from damage resulting from a minor impact. That's a big problem for any car, but especially so for those sold on the merits of economy. To prove that it's not too difficult for auto manufacturers to design a better bumper, the IIHS made a few simple changes to a Prius that didn't affect the looks of the car. After retesting, it made it through the impact tests with a fraction of the damage.  For the complete rundown on the testing procedures and results, click past the break.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe">2008 Ford Focus SES Coupe</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/ab-garage_08focus-0_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/ab-garage_08focus-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/ab-garage_08focus-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/ab-garage_08focus-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-ford-focus-ses-coupe/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/ab-garage_08focus-4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: IIHS]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IIHS praises Ford Focus for cheap crash repairs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/">IIHS praises Ford Focus for cheap crash repairs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1308086/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>economy car crash tests</category><category>EconomyCarCrashTests</category><category>focus crash tests</category><category>FocusCrashTests</category><category>ford focus</category><category>FordFocus</category><category>iihs</category><category>insurance institute for highway safety</category><category>InsuranceInstituteForHighwaySafety</category><category>prius crash tests</category><category>PriusCrashTests</category><category>small car crash tests</category><category>SmallCarCrashTests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1308086/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/09/09/iihs-praises-ford-focus-for-cheap-crash-repairs/1308086/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1308086</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/ab-garage_08focus_4501_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: Fiat 500 vs. Audi Q7, guess who wins]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/fiat/" rel="tag">Fiat</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/fiat-q7-accident.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em>Click above to view the video <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/">after the jump</a></em>
<p> </p>
<p>Small, fuel efficient vehicles are <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/22/no-new-minis-for-08-manufacturers-tapped-dealers-sold-out/">all the rage</a> right now, and many SUV owners are willing to do just about anything to get out of their gas guzzling transportation. Problem is, if you do get a new MINI or Yaris, you still have to drive it out into the automotive wilderness. SUVs and big pickup trucks are still omnipresent, and driving a vehicle that barely comes up to the bumper on an F-150 just doesn't look that safe. Automakers will tell you that their new go-karts get five stars in crash tests and that they're as safe as ever, but wouldn't you like to see what would happen if a three-ton SUV hit one of these miniature motor vehicles? <br /><br />The good news is that there is just such a video that resides on YouTube, and it pits the massive Audi Q7 against the cute and tiny Fiat 500. While we would desperately like the folks at Fiat to send the 500 State-side, watching the video doesn't exactly make us want to drive one ourselves. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/">Hit the jump</a> to see how the Fiat fared, but if you have a strong affinity for crash test dummies, you may want to take a pass on this one.<em>Thanks for the tip, JC!</em></p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pVF1Wr7GLQ&amp;eurl=http://www.burlappcars.com/2008/07/unfair-fight.html">YouTube</a>]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIDEO: Fiat 500 vs. Audi Q7, guess who wins</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/">VIDEO: Fiat 500 vs. Audi Q7, guess who wins</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pVF1Wr7GLQ&amp;eurl=http://www.burlappcars.com/2008/07/unfair-fight.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1267050/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accident</category><category>Audi Q7</category><category>AudiQ7</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>Fiat 500</category><category>Fiat500</category><category>safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1267050/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/07/28/video-fiat-500-vs-audi-q7-guess-who-wins/1267050/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1267050</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/fiat-q7-accident_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[IIHS releases official results on the smart fortwo]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/smart/" rel="tag">Smart</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/smart-fortwo-iihs-crash-test/804630/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/03_iihs_smart_fortwo_450-op.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em>Click above for a high-res gallery of the smart fortwo crash tests.</em><br /><br />The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has finally released its official data on the smart fortwo, and it appears that the lil' urban runabout held its own during the IIHS' tests. The fortwo racked up a rating of "good" on both the frontal and side-impact tests, while rear impacts were scored as "acceptable." IIHS President, Adrian Lund, made it clear that normally bigger and heavier vehicles are the safer choice, "but among the smallest cars, the engineers of the Smart did their homework and designed a high level of safety into a very small package."<br /><br />Make the jump to read all the details of the IIHS' findings.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/smart-fortwo-iihs-crash-test">smart fortwo IIHS Crash Test</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/smart-fortwo-iihs-crash-test/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/01_iihs_smart_fortwo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/smart-fortwo-iihs-crash-test/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/02_iihs_smart_fortwo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/smart-fortwo-iihs-crash-test/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/03_iihs_smart_fortwo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/smart-fortwo-iihs-crash-test/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/04_iihs_smart_fortwo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/smart-fortwo-iihs-crash-test/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/05_iihs_smart_fortwo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: IIHS]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IIHS releases official results on the smart fortwo</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/">IIHS releases official results on the smart fortwo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 09:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1194551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking</category><category>crash results</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashResults</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>fortwo</category><category>smart</category><category>smart fortwo crash results</category><category>smart fortwo crash tests</category><category>SmartFortwoCrashResults</category><category>SmartFortwoCrashTests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1194551/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/05/14/iihs-releases-official-results-on-the-smart-fortwo/1194551/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1194551</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/03_iihs_smart_fortwo_450-op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[IIHS midsize smack down: Side impact ratings better, rear crashes, not so much]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/ces0811_03_450-op.jpg" /><br /><br />The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety just wrapped up its latest battery of batterings and most of the tested contenders in the mid-size segment faired well. The Dodge Avenger and Chrysler Sebring, along with the Infiniti G35, Nissan Altima, Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura, Mitsubishi Galant and Kia Optima all received a grade of "Good" for front and side impacts, with the exception of the Optima, which ranked "Acceptable" during the side impact evaluation. However, problems arose in the rear crash test, where the G35, Altima, Malibu, and Aura were all rated as "Marginal," while the Avenger/Sebring received an "Average" score and the Optima walked away with a gold star and a "Good" rating. The only vehicle that received a "Poor" rating on any of the tests was the Mitsubishi Galant, which didn't hold up as well during the rear-impact test.<br /><br />All the details from the IIHS are available in the press release after the jump.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IIHS midsize smack down: Side impact ratings better, rear crashes, not so much</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/">IIHS midsize smack down: Side impact ratings better, rear crashes, not so much</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://press.iihs.org/2008/041008/default.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1163093/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevrolet malibu</category><category>ChevroletMalibu</category><category>chrysler sebring</category><category>ChryslerSebring</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>dodge aventer</category><category>DodgeAventer</category><category>iihs</category><category>infiniti g35</category><category>InfinitiG35</category><category>insurance institute for highway safety</category><category>InsuranceInstituteForHighwaySafety</category><category>kia optima</category><category>KiaOptima</category><category>mitsubishi galant</category><category>MitsubishiGalant</category><category>Nissan altima</category><category>NissanAltima</category><category>saturn aura</category><category>SaturnAura</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1163093/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/1163093/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1163093</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/ces0811_03_450-op_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New York '08 Preview: Ford featuring crash-tested Taurus]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/new-york-auto-show/" rel="tag">New York Auto Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-taurus-crash-test-car/704719/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/00_tauruscrashtest_opt.jpg" /></a><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Click above to view high-res gallery of crash-tested Ford Taurus</span><br /><br />Ford has been very quiet about what it will have onstage at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/New-York-Auto-Show/">New York Auto Show</a> tomorrow, but one vehicle we do know that will be under the lights is the <a href="http://autos.aol.com/cars-Ford-Taurus/overview">Ford Taurus</a>. While there will certainly be a number of Taurus models waxed, polished and placed just so in Ford's display at the Jacob Javits Center, one in particular will be a mess. Ford will display a crash-tested Taurus in New York to show off the big car's five-star rating for frontal and side crash tests from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Unlike the mangled Celica that used to sit outside your highschool at prom time, the crash-tested Taurus on display in New York will be interactive. Show goers will be allowed to sit in the post-crash Taurus to see what a crash test dummy sees after a 35-mph meet up with an offset concrete barrier. Looking at the pic above, it is pretty impressive that the passenger compartment remains untouched after such an event. We're looking forward to our seat time with this one, though any trip to the Autoblog Garage might necessitate a tow truck.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-taurus-crash-test-car">Ford Taurus Crash Test Car</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-taurus-crash-test-car/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/00_tauruscrashtest_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-taurus-crash-test-car/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/01_tauruscrashtest_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-taurus-crash-test-car/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/02_tauruscrashtest_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-taurus-crash-test-car/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/03_tauruscrashtest_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-taurus-crash-test-car/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/04_tauruscrashtest_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: Ford]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York '08 Preview: Ford featuring crash-tested Taurus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/">New York '08 Preview: Ford featuring crash-tested Taurus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1142904/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test</category><category>crash test dummies</category><category>crash testing</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTestDummies</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>ford taurus</category><category>FordTaurus</category><category>new york</category><category>new york 2008</category><category>new york auto show</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYork2008</category><category>NewYorkAutoShow</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:35:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1142904/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/03/18/new-york-08-preview-ford-featuring-crash-tested-taurus/1142904/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1142904</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/00_tauruscrashtest_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: Hyundai Genesis hits the wall hard for crash test]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhX2Q8X9ha4"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/genesis_crash_test.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/13/detroit-2008-2009-hyundai-genesis-revealed-phil-collins-would/">Hyundai Genesis</a> has just finished shooting its close-up. Shot in what looks like ABC Super Slo Mo, you get a pretty good idea of how you'll fare in a Genesis should you encounter another large object at speed. During the frontal impact test the passenger cabin remained virtually unaffected, and after seeing the side impact test all we can say is thank goodness for side airbags. Who knows, if the Genesis keeps turning in these kinds of performances, it could one day be a star. Follow the jump for the footage.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Thanks for the tip, wowfactor!</span><br /><br />[Source: YouTube]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VIDEO: Hyundai Genesis hits the wall hard for crash test</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/">VIDEO: Hyundai Genesis hits the wall hard for crash test</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhX2Q8X9ha4>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1093040/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>frontal impact crash test</category><category>FrontalImpactCrashTest</category><category>genesis</category><category>genesis crash test</category><category>GenesisCrashTest</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai crash test</category><category>hyundai genesis</category><category>hyundai genesis crash test</category><category>HyundaiCrashTest</category><category>HyundaiGenesis</category><category>HyundaiGenesisCrashTest</category><category>side impact crash test</category><category>SideImpactCrashTest</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:03:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1093040/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/01/22/video-hyundai-genesis-hits-the-wall-hard-for-crash-test/1093040/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1093040</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/genesis_crash_test_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA head says crash standards should be higher]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/24/nhtsa-head-says-crash-standards-should-be-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/24/nhtsa-head-says-crash-standards-should-be-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/24/nhtsa-head-says-crash-standards-should-be-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070924/SUB/709240314/1021/rss09&amp;rssfeed=rss09"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/nhtsa_hush_hush.jpg" /></a>Nicole Nason, head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), maintains that the crash standards that have been on the books since 1973 are due for a revision. Recognizing the 9 out of 10 vehicles routinely score either four- or five-stars on the administration's tests, she's seeking to increase the standards for front- and side-impacts, along with more stringent testing of rollover protection.<br /><br />The move is due to what some feel are antiquated testing measures, as well as the assertion that automakers engineer vehicles specifically to perform well on the current tests. Increased rollover protection is apparently one of the major goals of the administration, and Nason is planning on rewriting a 2005 proposal that would increase roof strength. However, she concedes that it will only save approximately 100 lives per year.<br /><br />Automakers have contended for some time that the technological saturation point for crash protection is getting closer, and that driver behavior needs to be addressed. Nason maintains that vehicles should be able to overcome mistakes by the user, saying, "The future of automotive safety is crash avoidance technology." Why these two goals can't be addressed simultaneously is anyone's guess.<br /><br />[Source: Automotive News - Sub. Req.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/24/nhtsa-head-says-crash-standards-should-be-higher/">NHTSA head says crash standards should be higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070924/SUB/709240314/1021/rss09&amp;rssfeed=rss09>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/24/nhtsa-head-says-crash-standards-should-be-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/996529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/24/nhtsa-head-says-crash-standards-should-be-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash test changes</category><category>crash test revision</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTestChanges</category><category>CrashTestRevision</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>impact tests</category><category>ImpactTests</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>ncap</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nicole nason</category><category>NicoleNason</category><category>revision</category><category>rollover</category><category>rollover protection</category><category>RolloverProtection</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:53:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/996529/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/09/24/nhtsa-head-says-crash-standards-should-be-higher/996529/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>996529</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/nhtsa_hush_hush_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports debuts crash-in theater]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><br /><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/crash-videos-ov.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/neoncrashweb.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Oh how we all love a good car crash, but finding good, slow-motion automotive carnage on the Web hasn't been all that easy to find. Until now. <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/safety-recalls/carcrashtest/crashtestvideo.htm">Consumer Reports</a> has put hours of crash-test video from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety online, free for anyone to see.<br /><br />We've already lost hours of productivity to CR's new Crash-In Theater and we're sure you will too. We highly recommend watching the frontal offset test of the 2000 Dodge Neon. It's just amazing how bent out of shape the door frame gets and surprising how much air the rear tires achieve. Oh, and the narrator says the steering wheel actually snapped off from the steering column. That can't be good.<br /><br />While we found the videos highly entertaining, used- and new-car shoppers will surely find the videos and accompanying analysis beneficial. For those shopping for a used Pontiac Transport, you really, really should watch that video. For those squeamish about seeing a crash-test dummy pretty much destroyed, you really, really shouldn't.<br /><br />[Source: Consumer Reports]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/">Consumer Reports debuts crash-in theater</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/crash-videos-ov.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/971590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>automotive safety</category><category>AutomotiveSafety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>crash test videos</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>CrashTestVideos</category><category>IIHS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/971590/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/971590/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>971590</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/neoncrashweb_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[IIHS crashes convertibles too! Saab 9-3, Volvo C70 earn top ratings]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr053107.html#"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/volvo_crash.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) just wrapped up its own version of a clinical demolition derby on some of the newest drop tops around, and when the airbag dust settled, the Saab 9-3 and the Volvo C70 earned the Institute's Top Safety Pick award. Both vehicles scored "good" in front, side and rear crashes, while others, like the Pontiac G6, didn't fare quite as well.<br /><br />[Source: IIHS]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IIHS crashes convertibles too! Saab 9-3, Volvo C70 earn top ratings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/">IIHS crashes convertibles too! Saab 9-3, Volvo C70 earn top ratings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 31 May 2007 07:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr053107.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/907498/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>9-3</category><category>c70</category><category>convertible</category><category>convertibles</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>g6</category><category>iihs</category><category>insurance institute for highway safety</category><category>InsuranceInstituteForHighwaySafety</category><category>pontiac</category><category>roll bars</category><category>RollBars</category><category>saab</category><category>volvo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 07:55:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/907498/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/05/31/iihs-crashes-convertibles-too-saab-9-3-volvo-c70-earn-top-rati/907498/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>907498</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/volvo_crash_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai Azera proves crashworthiness to IIHS - earns "Good"]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/06/hyundai-azera-proves-crashworthiness-to-iihs-earns-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/06/hyundai-azera-proves-crashworthiness-to-iihs-earns-good/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/06/hyundai-azera-proves-crashworthiness-to-iihs-earns-good/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><img height="258" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/06Azera_5.jpg" width="450" align="top"vspace="4" border="0" /><br /><br />The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has given the new 2006 Hyundai Azera afrontal offset impact rating of "Good", the organization's best rating for crashworthiness. Like manya Hyundai, the Azera's virtually a padded room on wheels with Electronic Stability Control, Traction Control, ABSand eight airbags all standard. <br /><br />The Azera's "Good" rating gives Hyundai a full-boat ofhighly rated vehicles. All current model Hyundai vehicles tested by the IIHS, which includes the Elantra, Santa Fe,Sonata and XG300/XG350, have earned a "Good" frontal offset impact rating. <br /><br />[Source: Hyundai and<a href="http://www.iihs.org/ratings/default.aspx">IIHS</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/06/hyundai-azera-proves-crashworthiness-to-iihs-earns-good/">Hyundai Azera proves crashworthiness to IIHS - earns "Good"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/06/hyundai-azera-proves-crashworthiness-to-iihs-earns-good/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/606118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/06/hyundai-azera-proves-crashworthiness-to-iihs-earns-good/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Azera</category><category>crash test</category><category>crash testing</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>elantra</category><category>front offset impact</category><category>FrontOffsetImpact</category><category>Good rating</category><category>GoodRating</category><category>Hyundai</category><category>IIHS</category><category>Insurance Institute for Highway Safety</category><category>InsuranceInstituteForHighwaySafety</category><category>midsize sedan</category><category>MidsizeSedan</category><category>santa fe</category><category>SantaFe</category><category>sedan</category><category>sonata</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/606118/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/04/06/hyundai-azera-proves-crashworthiness-to-iihs-earns-good/606118/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>606118</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/06Azera_5_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Insurance Institute for Highway Safety alters crash test practices]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/01/insurance-institute-for-highway-safety-alters-crash-test-practic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/01/insurance-institute-for-highway-safety-alters-crash-test-practic/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/01/insurance-institute-for-highway-safety-alters-crash-test-practic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/3760725.html"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/crashed-buick-lucerne.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>TheInsurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has altered its testing policy for frontal offset crashes, allowingautomakers of top-rated vehicles to submit test data to verify before the institute issues a rating. Nine vehicles for2006, including the Buick Lucerne (pictured), Hyundai Azera, and the Toyota RAV4, have already received good ratingsbased on submitted data from their automakers.<br /><br />The IIHS instituted the new policy based on automakers'improvements in frontal crash protection. Note: only redesigned vehicles are eligible for this policy. The institutewill still test 'substantially redesigned' models, and will also perform audits on eligible vehicles to verifyautomakers' data.<br /><br />The IIHS plans to use resources freed from the new policy towards side-impact crash testsand avoidance technologies.<br /><br />[Source: Associated Press via&nbsp; Houston Chronicle]<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/01/insurance-institute-for-highway-safety-alters-crash-test-practic/">Insurance Institute for Highway Safety alters crash test practices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 01 Apr 2006 12:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/3760725.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/01/insurance-institute-for-highway-safety-alters-crash-test-practic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/604434/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/01/insurance-institute-for-highway-safety-alters-crash-test-practic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crash tests</category><category>IIHS</category><category>Insurance Institute</category><category>InsuranceInstitute</category><category>policy</category><category>Side Impact</category><category>SideImpact</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 12:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/604434/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/04/01/insurance-institute-for-highway-safety-alters-crash-test-practic/604434/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>604434</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/crashed-buick-lucerne_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>