<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tesla Model S earns 99 out of 100 score from Consumer Reports [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tesla/" rel="tag">Tesla</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-tesla-model-s-first-drive/#photo-5273217"><img alt="Tesla Model S" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/tesla-model-s-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2013/07/tesla-model-s-review/index.htm"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> is awfully fond of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tesla/model+s/">Tesla Model S</a>. The EV managed to pull down an impressive score of 99 out of 100 in the organization's evaluation, besting the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/panamera/">Porsche Panamera Hybrid</a> by a full 16 points. CR calls the battery-operated sedan "the most practical electric car we've ever tested" thanks to its 200 mile range and blistering 5.6-second dash to 60 miles per hour. Testers also had praise for the vehicle's excellent handling characteristics and clever packaging, but found issue with the large touch screen mounted in the center of the dash. According to CR, the screen requires too much time looking down and away from the road.<br />
<br />
The publication also called out the car for skipping the spare tire, compressor and run flat tires, but those issues weren't enough to keep the machine from earning a top nod. You can head over to <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2013/07/tesla-model-s-review/index.htm"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> to read the full review for yourself, and be sure to check out the <a href="/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/#continued">video below</a> for a better picture of the machine's highlights, including some EV drifting (even CR likes to have some fun).<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tesla Model S earns 99 out of 100 score from Consumer Reports [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/">Tesla Model S earns 99 out of 100 score from Consumer Reports [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 09 May 2013 10:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20563544/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer reports</category><category>model s</category><category>tesla</category><category>tesla model s</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 10:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20563544/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/09/consumer-reports-scores-tesla-model-s-99-out-of-100/20563544/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20563544</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/tesla-model-s-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<em>Consumer Reports</em> names 2013 Top Picks; domestics miss the cut but get their own list]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/07/consumer-reports-names-2013-top-picks-domestics-miss-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/07/consumer-reports-names-2013-top-picks-domestics-miss-t/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/07/consumer-reports-names-2013-top-picks-domestics-miss-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a></p><a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2013/04/top-picks-2013/index.htm"><img alt="Consumer Reports Best Cars 2013" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/cr-top-picks-2012.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 250px; height: 318px; float: right;" /></a>According to <em>Consumer Reports</em>, "Top Picks are as close as it gets to "no-brainers" in the auto market. They're impressive all-around vehicles, chosen from more than 280 we've recently tested, that have excelled in our testing, are reliable, and have performed well in independent crash tests."<br />
<br />
Granted, CR's qualifications for picking the best new cars may be a bit different than our own (or yours, fellow automotive enthusiasts). Still, it's interesting to see which vehicles manage to straddle the line by being fun to drive, reliable and safe in the minds and charts of CR's testers. Seven new winners show up on CR's list of Top Picks for 2013, meaning there may be a surprise or two in the mix.<br />
<br />
Here are some highlights:<br />
<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="http://autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> took three awards in 2013, including the midsize category with its <a href="http://autoblog.com/honda/accord/">Accord</a>. Honda was completely absent from CR's Top Picks list in 2012.</li>
	<li>
		The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/fr-s/">Scion FR-S</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/subaru/brz/">Subaru BRZ</a> twins were recognized as the best sportscars.</li>
	<li>
		The <a href="http://autoblog.com/audi/a6/">Audi A6</a> snagged the Luxury Car category while the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/3+series/">BMW 328i</a> took the Sports Sedan trophy.</li>
</ul>
We'll direct you over to <em>Consumer Reports</em> to <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2013/04/top-picks-2013/index.htm">see the full list</a>, but fans of American cars should take note that there isn't a single domestic model to be found in the Top Picks chart. That said, a completely separate list was created, as it has in past years, highlighting CR's findings of the best from the States. Again, a few highlights:<br />
<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> was the most awarded manufacturer, taking four separate categories.</li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> was close behind with three wins.</li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> took the luxury car win with the <a href="http://autoblog.com/chrysler/300/">300</a> and won the minivan category by default since it's the only domestic brand with an offering.</li>
</ul>
Check out <a href="http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2013/03/2013-american-top-picks-the-best-cars-born-in-the-usa.html">CR's list of American Top Picks here</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/07/consumer-reports-names-2013-top-picks-domestics-miss-t/"><em>Consumer Reports</em> names 2013 Top Picks; domestics miss the cut but get their own list</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/07/consumer-reports-names-2013-top-picks-domestics-miss-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20492973/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/07/consumer-reports-names-2013-top-picks-domestics-miss-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best new cars</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>consumer reports top picks</category><category>top picks</category><category>top picks 2013</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:44:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20492973/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/03/07/consumer-reports-names-2013-top-picks-domestics-miss-t/20492973/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20492973</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/03/cr-top-picks-2012_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lexus, Mazda and Subaru top <i>Consumer Reports</i> Brand Report Cards]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/" rel="tag">Mazda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/" rel="tag">Subaru</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-lexus-gs-350-f-sport-review/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/2013-lexus-gs350-f-sport-628.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
A revised methodology in devising its annual Car Brand Report Cards has seen <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer+reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> award <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> its top overall ranking for 2013. For the first time ever, the institute broke out individual brands from their larger corporate umbrellas, meaning car makers like Lexus and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/">Scion</a> were judged independently from parent company <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a>. That strategy worked out well for Lexus, as the luxury brand earned a top report card score of 79 for the 2013 model year.<br />
<br />
The institute has recommended every one of the Lexus models it has tested to date, and said that the company's products won out thanks to "a foundation of plush and very reliable vehicles."<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/">Mazda</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru</a> tied for the second-highest scoring report cars, with scores of 76. Subaru earned praised for sporting models like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/brz/">BRZ</a>, which CR testers apparently had a lot of fun driving (naturally), while the Mazda products were lauded for their blend of practicality, sportiness and efficiency. Both of the Japanese brands offered good handling, fuel economy and versatility, said <em>Consumer Reports</em>.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="pull-quote pull-quote-right">
	<p>
		The institute has recommended every one of the Lexus models it has tested to date.</p>
</blockquote>
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/">Acura</a> and Toyota rounded out the top five with twin scores of 74 points. A full eight out of the top ten best brands were Japanese companies, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/">Audi</a> (eighth place) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a> (tenth place) the only European companies with high-ranking scores. CR noted that those Euro brands were inconsistent this year, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/">Volkswagen</a> losing ground and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini/">Mini</a> doing the worst overall of the European brands, at 20 out of 26 overall.<br />
<br />
Domestic automakers didn't do particularly well, either. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> was at the tops of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> portfolio, but was still held back by just average reliability and no love at CR for "complicated CUE controls," a complaint we've heard before. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/">Lincoln</a> were also dinged for their infotainment systems and reliability, as well as for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ecoboost/">EcoBoost</a> engines that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/">didn't deliver on promised fuel economy ratings</a>. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> brands were the worst off, however, with just the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/durango/">Dodge Durango</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee</a> V6 and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/300/">Chrysler 300</a> V6 being recommended by the publication. Scroll down for the full list of Brand Report Card scores, as well as the <em>Consumer Reports</em> press release, or head over to CR's website to read the full feature and find out the granular info behind each of the brands.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lexus, Mazda and Subaru top <i>Consumer Reports</i> Brand Report Cards</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/">Lexus, Mazda and Subaru top <i>Consumer Reports</i> Brand Report Cards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20479156/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto quality</category><category>brand report cards</category><category>car quality</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>consumer reports 2013 brand report cards</category><category>lexus</category><category>mazda</category><category>quality</category><category>subaru</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seyth Miersma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20479156/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/26/lexus-mazda-and-subaru-top-consumer-reports-brand-report/20479156/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20479156</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/2013-lexus-gs350-f-sport-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai, <i>Los Angeles Times</i> and <i>Consumer Reports</i> in fuel economy skirmish?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hyundai-consumer-reports-fuel-economy-vs-epa-data-chart/full/"><img alt="Hyundai chart showing Consumer Reports vs. EPA fuel economy data" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/hyundai-cr-mpg-chart-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 472px;" /></a><br />
<br />
On Wednesday, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/"><em>Consumer Reports</em> issued a story</a> taking umbrage with the auto industry's move toward smaller, turbocharged engines, noting its own testing revealed that many such powerplants fail to deliver their promised fuel economy numbers. The story covered a variety of domestic and foreign automakers, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> featuring prominently in the discussion. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai">Hyundai</a> was also mentioned for its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/sonata/">Sonata Turbo</a>, but the Korean automaker's family sedan came within one observed mile per gallon of its EPA ratings in CR's test, and its normally aspirated 2.4-liter counterpart actually beat its combined EPA ratings, 27 mpg to 26.<br />
<br />
Good news for Hyundai, right? The automaker was so pleased with its report card that it sent out a small statement to a handful of news outlets including <em>Autoblog</em>, reading in part:<br />
<blockquote>
	<p>
		"We at Hyundai believe that <em>Consumer Reports</em> real-world average fuel economy testing results and EPA combined fuel economy results should correlate, and in fact do correlate nicely for some brands. Among all brands, Hyundai does particularly well in this correlation, with no high-volume brand having a better correlation between EPA combined and <em>Consumer Reports</em> real-world fuel economy."</p>
</blockquote>
Garden-variety PR stuff to this point, but here's where the issue <a href="http://autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/#continued">gets more complicated</a>...<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyundai, <i>Los Angeles Times</i> and <i>Consumer Reports</i> in fuel economy skirmish?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/">Hyundai, <i>Los Angeles Times</i> and <i>Consumer Reports</i> in fuel economy skirmish?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20451506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer reports</category><category>epa</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel economy ratings</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai consumer reports</category><category>hyundai epa</category><category>hyundai fuel economy</category><category>hyundai mpg</category><category>hyundaiconsumerreports</category><category>hyundaiepa</category><category>hyundaifueleconomy</category><category>hyundaimpg</category><category>los angeles times</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20451506/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/07/hyundai-los-angeles-times-and-consumer-reports-in/20451506/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20451506</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/hyundai-cr-mpg-chart-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Autoblog Podcast #319]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/timewarp/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><em><big>Jeep Grand Wagoneer, Hagerty's Future Classics, Consumer Reports Brand Perception Survey </big></em><a href="/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/#continued"><img alt="autoblog podcast logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 305px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Episode #319 of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/podcasts/">Autoblog Podcast</a> is here, and this week, Dan Roth, Zach Bowman and Jeff Ross talk about a team from Jeep visiting Wagonmaster for ideas to use on the upcoming Grand Wagoneer revival, Hagerty Insurance's predictions for future collectible classics, and Toyota, Ford and Honda topping the latest <em>Consumer Reports</em> brand perception survey. We wrap with your questions, and for those of you who hung with us live on our <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/channel/autoblog-podcast">UStream channel</a>, thanks for taking the time. <a href="/2013/01/29/autoblog-podcast-318/#continued">Keep reading</a> for our Q&amp;A module for you to scroll through and follow along, too. Thanks for listening!<br />
<br />
<b><strong>Autoblog Podcast #319:</strong></b><br />
<br />
<object application="" data="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf" height="24" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="290" x-shockwave-flash=""><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.weblogsinc.com/media/audio_player.swf" /><param name="FlashVars" value="soundFile=http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/podcasts/02-05-13-autoblog-E319.mp3" /><param name="quality" value="high" /></object><br />
<br />
<strong>Topics:</strong><br />
<br />
<ul>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/jeep-team-takes-a-field-trip-to-wagonmaster-researching-next-gr/">Jeep checks out the Grand Wagoneer at Wagonmaster</a></li>
	<li class="p1">
		<span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/hagerty-predicts-this-years-future-classics/">Hagerty predicts this years future classics</a></span></li>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">Toyota, Ford and Honda top out Consumer Reports brand perception survey</span></a></li>
</ul>
<br />
<i><big><strong>In the Autoblog Garage</strong></big></i>:<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/spark/">2013 Chevrolet Spark</a><br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/c-max/">2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b><strong>Hosts: </strong></b><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/dan-roth">Dan Roth</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/zach-bowman/">Zach Bowman</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bloggers/jeffrey-n-ross/">Jeff Ross</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<div bullet-circle.gif="" media="" style="margin: 0.5em 0px; list-style-type: none;" www.autoblog.com="">
	<strong>Runtime:</strong> 01:23:28</div>
<hr style="width: 628px;" />
<br />
<b><strong>Get the podcast</strong></b><br />
[<a href="http://www.ustream.tv/channel/autoblog-podcast">UStream</a>] Listen live on Mondays at 10PM Eastern at UStream<br />
[<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml">RSS</a>] Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<br />
[<a href="http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/autoblog/podcasts/02-05-13-autoblog-E319.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3 directly<br />
<br />
<strong>Feedback</strong><br />
Email: Podcast at Autoblog dot com<br />
<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469"><br />
Review the show in iTunes</a><br />
<div id="cke_pastebin" style="position: absolute; top: 8px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden; left: -1000px;">
</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/">Autoblog Podcast #319</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20448643/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 chevrolet spark</category><category>2013 ford c-max hybrid</category><category>autoblog</category><category>autoblog podcast</category><category>autoblog podcast 319</category><category>c-max</category><category>c-max hybrid</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>featured</category><category>ford</category><category>future clasic</category><category>grand wagoneer</category><category>hagerty</category><category>hagerty insurance</category><category>honda</category><category>jeep</category><category>podcast</category><category>podcast 319</category><category>spark</category><category>toyota</category><category>wagoneer</category><category>wagonmaster</category><enclosure url="http://www.autoblog.com/podcasts/02-05-13-autoblog-E319.mp3" length="39" type="audio/mpeg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:15:00 EST</pubDate><itunes:subtitle>Autoblog Podcast #319</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Autoblog</itunes:author><itunes:duration>01:23:28</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20448643/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/05/autoblog-podcast-319/20448643/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20448643</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<em>Consumer Reports</em> criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="/2013/02/04/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/#continued"><img alt="Ford Ecoboost Engine Cover" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/ford-ecoboost-emblem-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for <em>Consumer Reports</em>, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."<br /> <br /> Specifically, CR calls out the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion/">Ford Fusion</a> equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.<br /> <br /> The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze/">Chevrolet Cruze</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/sonata/">Hyundai Sonata Turbo</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/escape/">Ford Escape 2.0T</a> all got dinged for the same troubles, though <em>Consumer Reports</em> has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the <a href="/2013/02/04/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/#continued">full press release below</a>. You can also read the full study on the <a href="http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2013/02/consumer-reports-finds-small-turbo-engines-dont-deliver-on-fuel-economy-claims.html"><em>Consumer Reports</em> site</a>, or scroll down for a short <a href="/2013/02/04/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/#continued">video recap</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><em>Consumer Reports</em> criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/"><em>Consumer Reports</em> criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20448871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 bmw 3 series</category><category>2013 chevrolet cruze</category><category>2013 ford escape</category><category>2013 ford fusion</category><category>2013 hyundai sonata</category><category>3 series</category><category>328i</category><category>bmw</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet cruze</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>cruze</category><category>ecoboost</category><category>escape</category><category>ford</category><category>ford escape</category><category>ford fusion</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fusion</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai sonata</category><category>sonata</category><category>turbo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:13:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20448871/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/05/consumer-reports-criticizes-small-turbo-engines-for-mis/20448871/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20448871</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/ford-ecoboost-emblem-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #319 LIVE!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/timewarp/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/off-road/" rel="tag">Off-Road</a></p><a href="/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/#continued"><img alt="Autoblog Podcast graphic" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 305px;" /></a><br />
<br />
We record <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast #319 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&amp;A module below. Subscribe to the <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">in iTunes</a> if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/channel/autoblog-podcast">UStream</a> (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.<br />
<br />
<strong><big>Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #319</big></strong><br />
<br />
<ul>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/jeep-team-takes-a-field-trip-to-wagonmaster-researching-next-gr/">Jeep checks out the Grand Wagoneer at Wagonmaster</a></li>
	<li class="p1">
		<span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/hagerty-predicts-this-years-future-classics/">Hagerty predicts this years future classics</a></span></li>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">Toyota, Ford and Honda top out Consumer Reports brand perception survey</span></a></li>
</ul>
<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml">RSS</a>] Add the <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript">var vhm_widget_settings = { eventId: 3159508, colorScheme: 'redblack', width: 628, height: 550, sizeClass: 3};</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/qawidget.js.jsp"></script><noscript><span>Can't see the EventBox? <a href="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/view?eventId=1920456&amp;colorScheme=redblack">Click Here.</a></span><br/><br/><a href='http://www.voicesheardmedia.com'>Voices Heard Media</a></noscript><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/">Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #319 LIVE!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20448033/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoblog podcast 319</category><category>autoblog podcast topics</category><category>classics</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ford</category><category>future classics</category><category>grand wagoneer</category><category>hagerty</category><category>hagerty insurance</category><category>honda</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep grand wagoneer</category><category>podcast 319</category><category>podcast topics</category><category>topics</category><category>toyota</category><category>wagonmaster</category><category>wagonmaster jeep</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:20:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20448033/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/04/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-319-live/20448033/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20448033</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota, Ford and Honda again top <em>Consumer Reports</em> Car-Brand Perception Survey]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="/2013/01/31/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/#continued"><img alt="Toyota Camry Hybrid Emblem" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/toyota-camry-hybrid-emblem-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> has released its annual Car-Brand Perception Survey, and the list looks awfully familiar. The top six brands are identical to last year's results, with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toytoa/">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> continuing to occupy the podium. All told, Toyota walked away with 133 points, putting it 15 ahead of second-place Ford. Honda jumped 26 points this year, narrowing Ford's lead to just four points in total.<br />
<br />
<em>Consumer Reports</em> polls buyers from across the country on how they see multiple brands in seven categories, including quality, safety, value, performance, design/style, technology/innovation and environmentally friendly/green. Researchers then combine the findings to come up with the total brand score.<br />
<br />
While value and performance remain important to buyers, CR found quality and safety are still on top when it comes to significance. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/">Scion</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/">Mitsubishi</a> found themselves at the bottom of the pack with the worst score of all, tied at just six points. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram">Ram</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/fiat">Fiat</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini">Mini</a> filled out the lowest five with scores of seven, eight and 10 points, respectively. You can read the <a href="/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/#continued">full press release below </a>for more information, or head over to the <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/2013/02/2013-car-brand-perception-survey/index.htm"><em>Consumer Reports</em> site</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota, Ford and Honda again top <em>Consumer Reports</em> Car-Brand Perception Survey</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/">Toyota, Ford and Honda again top <em>Consumer Reports</em> Car-Brand Perception Survey</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20445869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car brand perception</category><category>car brand perception survey</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ford</category><category>honda</category><category>toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20445869/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/01/toyota-ford-and-honda-again-top-consumer-reports-car-b/20445869/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20445869</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/toyota-camry-hybrid-emblem-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i> selling its road-tested roadsters [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2013/01/for-sale-road-tested-german-sports-cars-audi-bmw-mercedes-porsche.html"><img height="458" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/crtestcars.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Here's a chance to acquire a celebrity-owned vehicles, and this time at a discount instead of a premium. So the celebrity in this case is <em>Consumer Reports</em>, that magazine that could be equally adored and abhored by car enthusiasts. CR buys all of its test vehicles and usually finds willing second owners within its own ranks, but its opening its small used-car lot to the public. On the forecourt are four roadsters: an automatic 2012 <a href="http://autoblog.com/audi/tt">Audi TT</a> 2.0 TFSI Quattro S-Tronic with 6,600 miles for $36,500, a manual 2012 <a href="http://autoblog.com/bmw/z4">BMW Z4</a> sDrive28i with 8,400 miles for $45,000, a manual 2012 <a href="http://autoblog.com/mercedes-benz">Mercedes-Benz</a> SLK250 for $39,500 and a manual 2013 <a href="http://autoblog.com/porsche/boxster">Porsche Boxster</a> with 7,000 miles for $48,000.<br />
<br />
Those numbers mean a savings of $9,000 to $10,000 before haggling - each car is listed with an "Asking price" so there could be some wiggle room if you show up with pockets full of dough and eyes full of serious intent. Since the money CR earns from the sales go back into the magazine's budget to buy more test cars, however, it probably won't take any oddball trades, so you can forget about getting any purchasing help from that track-day AMC Javelin project on blocks in the back yard.<br />
<br />
The vehicles have been taken care of and spiffed up for sale; buyers will take delivery at the CR test track in East Haddam, Connecticut and get a tour of the facilities. While you're there they'll even take you on a lap around the track so you can feel how your car handles when driven by one of its testers. They will probably not help you with advice on which toaster and dehumidifier to buy - you'll still need to get a subscription for that. Have a look at the <a href="/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/#continued">video below</a> to see a day in the life of a CR test car.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i> selling its road-tested roadsters [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/"><i>Consumer Reports</i> selling its road-tested roadsters [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20444388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>audi</category><category>bmw</category><category>boxster</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>mercedes-benz</category><category>porsche</category><category>slk</category><category>tt</category><category>video</category><category>videos</category><category>youtube</category><category>z4</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20444388/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/31/consumer-reports-selling-its-road-tested-roadsters-w-vid/20444388/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20444388</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/crtestcars_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i>: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-fusion-1/"><img alt="2013 Ford Fusion - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/2013-ford-fusion---red.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 363px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Waiting for a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> compliment from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> these days is like waiting for a low-cost new product from Apple. So we weren't really expecting a glowing review of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion">2013 Ford Fusion</a> when CR got its hands on the car. The institute's crew bought three different versions of the Fusion (Hybrid, 1.6-liter <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/focus+electric/">EcoBoost</a> and a Titanium with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost) to put through its barrage of tests, and while we <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/">aren't too surprised by some of the findings</a>, they're still interesting nonetheless.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/u-s-spec-mitsubishi-i-miev/"><img alt="Mitsubishi i - front three-quarter view, studio image" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/us-spec-mitsubishi-i-250.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 250px; height: 166px; float: right;" /></a>CR praises the Fusion for its "eye-catching" design and says that the sportier Titanium trim level is the best-handling midsize sedan they've ever tested, but that's about where the good news ends for Ford. The Fusion Hybrid also posted the best-ever fuel economy CR has recorded in a midsize sedan, but the only problem is that their number was 39 miles per gallon combined - far less than Ford's 47 mpg rating for city, highway and combined. As expected, CR also dinged the Fusion for its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/myford+touch/">MyFord Touch</a>, but some of the other gripes about the car include a cramped cabin and poor fit and finish.<br />
<br />
Other Ford products tested this time around include the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/focus+electric/">Focus Electric</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/c-max">C-Max Hybrid</a>. Like the Fusion, CR's observed fuel economy of 37 mpg for the C-Max fell well short of Ford's advertised 47-mpg rating, and both cars were criticized for the use of MyFord Touch. CR notes that the Focus Electric's interior is also cramped, with the battery pack taking up a lot of cargo space.<br />
<br />
In other news, CR slams the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/i/">Mitsubishi i-MiEV</a> electric car rather mercilessly, something that is perhaps less surprising. The institute digs into the low-cost urban runabout for its lack of speed, payload, and chintzy finish, among other things.<br />
<br />
You can check out videos about the Fusion Hybrid, Focus Electric and i-MiEV by scrolling <a href="/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i>: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/"><i>Consumer Reports</i>: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20436546/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 ford fusion</category><category>2013 mitsubishi i</category><category>c-max hybrid</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>focus electric</category><category>ford</category><category>fusion</category><category>i-miev</category><category>mitsubishi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20436546/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/23/consumer-reports-ford-fusion-fun-but-flawed-mitsubishi/20436546/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20436546</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/2013-ford-fusion---red_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i> best value awards dominated by Toyota]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/#continued"><img height="359" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/toyota-logo.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Each year, <a href="http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2012/12/best-new-car-values-how-to-find-the-cars-that-offer-the-best-value.html"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> compiles a list of the vehicles it expects to be the best and worst when it comes to holding their original resale value, and the list of best values for 2012 is, not surprisingly, dominated by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> products. Overall, the best value for 2012 is the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/prius/">Toyota Prius</a>, while the worst car for the money is the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/7+series/">BMW 750Li</a>, according to the magazine.<br />
<br />
The Prius knocked the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/fit/">Honda Fit</a> from the top spot, which was the best value four years running, and it did so despite costing $10,000 more as tested. As CR points out, a higher price does not equate to less value just as a lower price does not guarantee a higher value. A total of 15 Toyota, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/">Scion</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> made the list with only one, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/gs/">Lexus GS 350</a>, having a lower-than-average resale value. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/">Volkswagen</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru</a> pulled in an impressive amount of cars on the list, too. On the opposite end of the stick, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> was hit hard with all seven of the cars listed (across the Chrysler, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/">Dodge</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeep</a> brands) rated with a below-average resale value.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/#continued"> Scroll down</a> to see the winners and losers for each category, but to view the full breakdown of the best and worst values on the market, a CR subscription is required.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i> best value awards dominated by Toyota</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/"><i>Consumer Reports</i> best value awards dominated by Toyota</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20412057/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best resale value</category><category>best value 2012</category><category>car buying</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>resale value</category><category>toyota resale value</category><category>worst resale value</category><category>worst value 2012</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:44:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20412057/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/27/consumer-reports-best-value-awards-dominated-by-toyota/20412057/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20412057</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/toyota-logo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i> love affair with Honda back on track with 2013 Accord [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-honda-accord-sport-first-drive/"><img alt="2013 Honda Accord Sport" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/2013-honda-accord-sport-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> seem to have patched things up thanks to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/accord/">2013 Accord</a>. The publication says the four-cylinder sedan now sits at the top of its class after testing, beating out the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/sonata/">Hyundai Sonata</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/camry/">Toyota Camry</a>, while the V6 Accord is giving the Camry and Camry Hybrid serious competition in CR ratings. The Accord managed to improve its position thanks to its fuel economy, smooth CVT and driving characteristics, though testers also said the Accord boasts "one of the best driving positions available in its class."<br />
<br />
That's not to say there weren't a few sore spots. <em>Consumer Reports</em> found the sedan's optional Lane Watch system to be gimmicky given the tech doesn't cover the driver's side blind spot. While the full test results are currently available on the <a href="http://web.consumerreports.org/test/SEM/version5.htm?EXTKEY=SG72CR0&amp;CMP=KNC-CROBRANDG&amp;HBX_OU=50&amp;HBX_PK=consumer_reports">CR web site</a>, the report will also show up in the February issue of the magazine. Expect to see it hit news stand on December 27. Until then, you can check out the <a href="/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/#continued">full press release below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i> love affair with Honda back on track with 2013 Accord [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/"><i>Consumer Reports</i> love affair with Honda back on track with 2013 Accord [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20406392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 accord</category><category>2013 honda accord</category><category>accord</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>honda</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:25:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20406392/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/18/consumer-reports-love-affair-with-honda-back-on-track-wit/20406392/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20406392</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/2013-honda-accord-sport-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<em>Consumer Reports</em>: Toyota expected to announce fix for emergency trunk releases]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/13/consumer-reports-toyota-expected-to-announce-fix-for-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/13/consumer-reports-toyota-expected-to-announce-fix-for-e/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/13/consumer-reports-toyota-expected-to-announce-fix-for-e/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://2013 Lexus GS 350 F Sport"><img alt="2013 Lexus GS 350 F Sport" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/01-2013-lexus-gs350-f-sport-review-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
According to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> is set to release a fix for trunk release pulls on certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> vehicles that could snap off in an emergency. As you may recall, CR found the federally-mandated emergency releases <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/12/consumer-reports-finds-flaw-with-lexus-es-gs-emergency-t/">could break</a> if pulled toward the user. As it turned out, the trunk surround behaved like a fulcrum, putting more force against the center of the release than toward the trunk mechanism itself. While the organization found the problem to exist on 2013 Lexus ES and GS, Toyota was able to replicate the flaw on the IS as well.<br />
<br />
Toyota will alert 700,000 owners of 2007-2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/es/">Lexus ES</a> models, 2006-2012 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/is/">IS</a> vehicles and 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/gs/">GS</a> cars and replace the old ABS plastic release with a sturdier polypropylene part free of charge once the components are available to dealers. The service campaign is expected to begin in January.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/13/consumer-reports-toyota-expected-to-announce-fix-for-e/"><em>Consumer Reports</em>: Toyota expected to announce fix for emergency trunk releases</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/13/consumer-reports-toyota-expected-to-announce-fix-for-e/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20401200/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/13/consumer-reports-toyota-expected-to-announce-fix-for-e/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer reports</category><category>emergency trunk release</category><category>lexus</category><category>lexus emergency trunk release</category><category>lexus es</category><category>lexus gs</category><category>lexus is</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20401200/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/13/consumer-reports-toyota-expected-to-announce-fix-for-e/20401200/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20401200</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/01-2013-lexus-gs350-f-sport-review-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[EPA to investigate Ford C-Max, Fusion fuel economy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/epa-to-investigate-ford-c-max-fusion-fuel-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/epa-to-investigate-ford-c-max-fusion-fuel-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/epa-to-investigate-ford-c-max-fusion-fuel-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-fusion-hybrid/#photo-4724285"><img alt="Ford Fusion Hybrid logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/fusion-hybrid-logo.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 405px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/epa/">Environmental Protection Agency</a> has said it "will look at the report and data" from <em>Consumer Reports</em> indicating that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/c-max/">2013 Ford C-Max</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion/">Fusion</a> hybrids don't come close to achieving their fuel economy estimates of 47 miles per gallon. In CR testing, the C-Max Hybrid averaged 37 mpg; the Fusion Hybrid averaged 39.<br />
<br />
CR reports that the 10-mpg difference recorded with the C-Max represents "the largest discrepancy between our overall-mpg results and the estimates published by the EPA that we've seen among any current models." For reference, the <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/prius/">Toyota Prius</a> came up six mpg short of EPA estimates under CR's testing.<br />
<br />
So, what happens if the EPA finds a discrepancy in Ford's mileage claims? According to <em>The Detroit News</em>, automakers may face civil penalties over misstated claims. Just a few weeks back, <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/kia/">Kia</a> were found to have <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/hyundai-kia-admit-exaggerated-mileage-claims-will-compensate-o/">overstated mileage estimates</a> for 1.1 million vehicles sold in the US and Canada, prompting the automaker to compensate owners for their now-reduced mileage figures. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/05/act-surprised-hyundai-kia-sued-over-inflated-fuel-mileage-rati/">Lawsuits</a>, reductions in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/24/new-car-shoppers-less-willing-to-consider-hyundai-kia-after-mil/">consumer confidence</a> and even <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/senate-calling-for-answers-from-hyundai-and-kia-over-mpg-debacle/">inquiries from politicians</a> are also potential problems in the pipeline.<br />
<br />
It's too early to suggest such drastic measures will be taken by <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>, especially since "a hybrid vehicle is going to be far more variable than a conventional vehicle" when it comes to observed fuel mileage, according to Linc Wehrly, director of light-duty vehicle center compliance division at the EPA's Ann Arbor laboratory.<br />
<br />
Ford, for its part, issued the following statement to <em>Consumer Reports</em>: "Early C-Max Hybrid and Fusion Hybrid customers praise the vehicles and report a range of fuel economy figures, including some reports above 47 mpg. This reinforces the fact that driving styles, driving conditions and other factors can cause mileage to vary."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/epa-to-investigate-ford-c-max-fusion-fuel-economy/">EPA to investigate Ford C-Max, Fusion fuel economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/epa-to-investigate-ford-c-max-fusion-fuel-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20398178/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/epa-to-investigate-ford-c-max-fusion-fuel-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 ford c-max hybrid</category><category>2013 ford fusion hybrid</category><category>c-max hybrid</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>environmental protection agency</category><category>epa</category><category>ford</category><category>ford hybrid mileage</category><category>fusion hybrid</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20398178/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/10/epa-to-investigate-ford-c-max-fusion-fuel-economy/20398178/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20398178</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/fusion-hybrid-logo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i> calls out Ford for false Fusion, C-Max hybrid fuel economy claims]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#continued"><img height="351" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/crvideo.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<em>Consumer Reports</em> is calling out <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a>, saying the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/c-max">C-Max</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion">Fusion</a> hybrids don't get anywhere near the 47 miles per gallon the automaker claims.<br />
<br />
Several automakers have faced backlash after consumers discovered their cars don't quite hit the lofty fuel economy figures promised by the companies, and Ford may be the newest casualty of all this pesky fact-checking by critics and watchdogs.<br />
<br />
The magazine drove the cars 2,000 miles and consistently got around 39 mpg for the Fusion and 37 mpg for the C-Max. Jake Fisher, director of auto testing for <em>Consumer Reports</em>, said this is the largest discrepancy between what automakers MPG claims and the actual real-world driving results.<br />
<br />
"It's not to say these are bad cars at all; they still get excellent fuel economy," Fisher said. "But we've been doing this for a long time, and we've never seen such a difference between the EPA estimates and our numbers."<br />
<br />
Ford said its figures were certified by the EPA, but the EPA only tests about 10 to 15 percent of the cars on the road. Ford said some early reports from customers showed the cars getting even better fuel economy than 47 mpg.<br />
<br />
"This reinforces the fact that driving styles, driving conditions, and other factors can cause mileage to vary," said Wes Sherwood, a spokesman for Ford. For customers who want to optimize their fuel economy, the cars come with different driving coach software to help drivers get better fuel economy, he said.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#continued">Scroll down</a> to watch the video report from <em>Consumer Reports</em>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i> calls out Ford for false Fusion, C-Max hybrid fuel economy claims</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/"><i>Consumer Reports</i> calls out Ford for false Fusion, C-Max hybrid fuel economy claims</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20396331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 ford c-max hybrid</category><category>2013 ford fusion hybrid</category><category>c-max</category><category>c-max hybrid</category><category>cmax</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ford</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fusion</category><category>fusion hybrid</category><category>mpg</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon Silke Carty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20396331/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/06/consumer-reports-calls-out-ford-for-false-fusion-c-max-h/20396331/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20396331</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/crvideo_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Redone 2013 Honda Civic seems to appease <em>Consumer Reports</em>]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/#continued"><img alt="2013 Honda Civic undergoing first testing by Consumer Reports - video screencap"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/consumer-reports-2013-honda-civic.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 438px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> and the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic/">Honda Civic</a> appear to have kissed and made up. Following the compact's substantial "emergency refresh" after just one year on the market, CR got its hands on the vehicle for a quick drive. While the evaluation was far from the standard CR test, the organization found the 2013 Civic to offer a better tuned suspension and less vague steering at first blush. While the split-tier dash still hangs around for another few years, the cabin has ditched much of its oddly textured plastic bits in favor of soft touch materials with nicer detailing. That fact also won the new model points over its predecessor.<br />
<br />
As you may recall, the 2012 Civic <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/08/01/honda-civic-loses-recommended-rating-from-consumer-reports/">scored too low</a> in <em>Consumer Report</em> evaluations to earn a "Recommended" rating. That fall from grace marked the first time the Honda model failed to make the cut, though that news didn't stop buyers from flocking to the vehicle. <em>Consumer Reports</em> will buy its own Civic and evaluate it once again soon. In the interim, you can check out the organization's initial impressions by <a href="/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/#continued">scrolling dow</a>n, as well as the brief writeup in the link below.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Redone 2013 Honda Civic seems to appease <em>Consumer Reports</em></em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/">Redone 2013 Honda Civic seems to appease <em>Consumer Reports</em></a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20391228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012 honda civic</category><category>2013 honda civic</category><category>civic</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>consumer reports recommended</category><category>honda</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:45:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20391228/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/30/redone-2013-honda-civic-seems-to-appease-consumer-reports-e/20391228/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20391228</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/consumer-reports-2013-honda-civic_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chevy Volt again tops <em>Consumer Reports</em> Owner-Satisfaction Survey]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-chevrolet-volt-quick-spin/"><img height="418" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/001-2013-chevrolet-volt-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/volt">Chevrolet Volt</a> has done the double, nearly <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/01/chevy-volt-tops-consumer-reports-latest-owner-satisfactio/">replicating its triumph from last year</a>: For its annual Owner Satisfaction Survey, the Consumer Reports National Research Center asked <em>Consumer Reports</em> readers, "Considering all factors (price, performance, reliability, comfort, enjoyment, etc.), would you get this car if you had it to do all over again?" Ninety-two percent of Volt owners answered "Definitely yes," topping nearly 250 other models for which responses were received. The only difference between this year and last is that in 2011, the Volt won the title thanks to 93 percent of its owners.<br />
<br />
Other fuel sippers earning garlands were the <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/camry+hybrid">Toyota Camry Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/prius">Toyota Prius</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/prius+c">Prius C</a>, and the <a href="http://autoblog.com/nissan/leaf">Nissan Leaf</a>. The sports category also had some repeat play in the top spots, last year's twosome of the <a href="http://autoblog.com/porsche/911">Porsche 911</a> and V8 <a href="http://autoblog.com/dodge/challenger">Dodge Challenger</a> were second and third, joined by the <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/corvette">Chevrolet Corvette</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/mustang">Ford Mustang</a>. The luxury segment was led by the <a href="http://autoblog.com/audi/a7">Audi A7</a>, <a href="http://autoblog.com/lexus/gs">Lexus GS</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/audi/a6">Audi A6</a>.<br />
<br />
Conversely, those stuck in the dog shed out back were fronted by the <a href="http://autoblog.com/nissan/versa">Nissan Versa</a>, the only car to register a score lower than 50 percent. It didn't lack for company, sharing its plot of dirt with the V6-powered twins the <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Chevrolet Silverado</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/gmc/sierra">GMC Sierra</a> pickups, the <a href="http://autoblog.com/nissan/armada">Nissan Armada</a>, <a href="http://autoblog.com/suzuki/sx4">Suzuki SX4</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/mitsubishi/outlander">Mitsubishi Outlander</a> SUVs.<br />
<br />
There's a press release <a href="/2012/11/28/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/#continued">below</a> with more information. Condensed results are available to anyone <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/2012/10/best-worst-cars-for-owner-satisfaction/index.htm">on the <em>Consumer Reports</em> site</a>, the complete results viewable online for subscribers and in the January issue.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chevy Volt again tops <em>Consumer Reports</em> Owner-Satisfaction Survey</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/">Chevy Volt again tops <em>Consumer Reports</em> Owner-Satisfaction Survey</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20390789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 chevrolet volt</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>owner satisfaction</category><category>survey</category><category>volt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20390789/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/29/chevy-volt-again-tops-consumer-reports-owner-satisfacti/20390789/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20390789</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/001-2013-chevrolet-volt-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Dodge Dart falls short of <i>Consumer Reports</i> Recommended, Caddy XTS and Lincoln MKS, too]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-dodge-dart-first-drive/#photo-4992909"><img alt="2013 Dodge Dart" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/2013-dodge-dart-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/dart/">Dodge Dart</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/xts/">Cadillac XTS</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/mks/">Lincoln MKS</a> all failed to earn a "Recommended" rating from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a>. When it came to the compact Dart, the organization's testers thought the vehicle offered a quiet cabin, solid-feeling chassis and nimble suspension, but the new model ultimately fell short of the coveted rating due to powertrain issues. The institute's reviewers found the base 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine to be underpowered and noted "drivability issues" when the available turbocharged 1.4-liter four was paired with the optional dual-clutch transmission (some of our editors disliked it paired with the six-speed manual). CR also dinged the latter powerplant for sounding "raspy." For what it's worth, we think the forced-induction engine offers an excellent and playful exhaust note, but that's just us.<br />
<br />
As for the XTS, CR lauded the car for its luxurious cabin, but the vehicle's experience was dulled by its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/">finicky CUE infotainment interfac</a>e. Overall, the big <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> scored much higher than its cross-town rival from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/">Lincoln</a>. While testers found the American luxury sedan to offer a quiet ride and quality fit and finish, they felt the MKS delivered a "cramped driving position, ungainly handling, uncomposed ride, and limited visibility." Ouch. At the end of the day, both cars fell short of rivals from Japan, Germany and Korea. Check out the full press release <a href="/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/#continued">below</a> with more details, along with CR's musings on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/spark/">Chevrolet Spark</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/es/">Lexus ES</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dodge Dart falls short of <i>Consumer Reports</i> Recommended, Caddy XTS and Lincoln MKS, too</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/">Dodge Dart falls short of <i>Consumer Reports</i> Recommended, Caddy XTS and Lincoln MKS, too</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20384685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 cadillac xts</category><category>2013 dodge dart</category><category>2013 lincoln mks</category><category>cadillac</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>dart</category><category>dodge</category><category>lincoln</category><category>mks</category><category>xts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 18:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20384685/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/22/dodge-dart-falls-short-of-consumer-reports-recommended-c/20384685/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20384685</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/2013-dodge-dart-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i> lambasts Cadillac's new CUE system]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a></p><a href="/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/#continued"><img height="370" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/cadillac-cue-cr-1353449250.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Well the good news (for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>) is that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/MyFordTouch/">MyFord Touch</a> may not be the most hated automotive technology around the <em>Consumer Reports</em> water cooler anymore. After getting its hands on a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/ats/">Cadillac ATS</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/xts/">XTS</a> to test out the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/cadillac%20cue/">CUE</a> infotainment system, CR had some pretty harsh words for the next-gen infotainment system.<br />
<br />
In the video <a href="/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/#continued">below</a>, the reviewer had problems using the capacitive buttons and referred to the system as being "fussy" multiple times, and the big rip came when he said that MyFord Touch (a technology that has been slammed by CR since its inception) is easier to navigate than CUE.<br />
<br />
Oddly enough, CR recently posted a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/">video</a> on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tesla/model+s/">Tesla Model S</a> and seemed to praise the car for its lack of buttons and knobs. Which is it guys? Do we have a buttonless future to look forward to or not? Check out what <em>Consumer Reports</em> had to say about Cadillac's new infotainment system in the video <a href="/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i> lambasts Cadillac's new CUE system</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/"><i>Consumer Reports</i> lambasts Cadillac's new CUE system</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20385044/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac cue</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>cue</category><category>in car electronics</category><category>in car entertainment</category><category>infotainment</category><category>technology</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20385044/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/21/consumer-reports-lambasts-cadillacs-new-cue-system/20385044/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20385044</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/cadillac-cue-cr-1353449250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Consumer Reports</i> weighs in with its first Tesla Model S review]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tesla/" rel="tag">Tesla</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/#continued"><img height="436" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/consumer-reports-tesla-model-s.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Everyone has been chiming in with their thoughts on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tesla/model+s/">Tesla Model S</a> lately, and with the car taking home awards like the prestigious <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/12/2013-motor-trend-car-of-the-year-tesla-model-s/"><em>Motor Trend</em> Car of the Year</a>, this probably won't change anytime soon. Not wanting to be left in the dark, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/consumer%20reports/"><em>Consumer Reports</em></a> has managed to get its hands on a Model S to give its own impressions of the luxurious electric hatchback.<br />
<br />
Like many other outlets (including our own <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/11/2012-tesla-model-s-first-drive-review-video/">first drive</a>), <em>CR</em> praised the Model S for its styling (which it compares to an <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/a7/">Audi A7</a>) and performance (which it says "can put serious hurt on a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/corvette/">Corvette</a>"). With limited time with the car, the video doesn't touch on the specific range the institute attained, but it appears most of the car's time was spent on the track anyway.<br />
<br />
On the flip side of things, CR dinged the Model S for its retractable door handles which the reviewer refers to as "fussy," and as much as CR has blasted <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> and its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/myford%20touch/">MyFord Touch</a> for being distracting and largely button-less in the past, we were surprised at how much it seemed to adore the lack of buttons on Model S. They even glossed over the fact that drivers can surf the Web on the 17-inch touch screen while driving.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/#continued">Scroll down</a> to watch the first drive video and then head over to <em><a href="http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2012/11/video-inside-the-impressive-tesla-model-s-electric-sedan.html?EXTKEY=I93YT01&amp;CMP=OTC-YUTBE">Consumer Reports</a></em> for the write-up.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em><i>Consumer Reports</i> weighs in with its first Tesla Model S review</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/"><i>Consumer Reports</i> weighs in with its first Tesla Model S review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20379054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012 tesla model s</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>model s</category><category>tesla</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20379054/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/14/consumer-reports-weighs-in-with-its-first-tesla-model-s-r/20379054/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20379054</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/consumer-reports-tesla-model-s_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>