<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Edmunds praises Volvo XC60, pans Cadillac SRX in new entry-lux CUV comparo]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/18/edmunds-pans-cadillac-srx-in-new-entry-lux-cuv-comparo-praises/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/18/edmunds-pans-cadillac-srx-in-new-entry-lux-cuv-comparo-praises/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/18/edmunds-pans-cadillac-srx-in-new-entry-lux-cuv-comparo-praises/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">Reviews</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/2010-volvo-xc60/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/xc60_630.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><strong><small>2010 Volvo XC60 - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></div>
<br />
Volvo's new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/04/review-2010-volvo-xc60-delivers-on-looks-and-lux-handling-to/">XC60</a> sits at the top of the pack when it battles head-to-head against the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/21/la-2008-2009-audi-q5-makes-its-north-american-debut/">Audi Q5</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/mercedes-adjusting-glk-model-mix-options-list-to-kickstart-sale/">Mercedes-Benz GLK350</a>, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/08/review-2010-cadillac-srx/">Cadillac SRX</a>, says Edmunds in its latest four-way comparison. The entrants, each new members of the expanding Compact Luxury Crossover segment, were all selected for the battle based on size and their less-than-$40,000 starting prices. Veterans such as the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/2008-acura-rdx-a-sports-car-in-a-cuv-costume/">Acura RDX</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/06/in-the-autoblog-garage-2007-bmw-x3-3-0si/">BMW X3</a>, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-infiniti-ex35/">Infiniti EX35</a> were left home as they aren't rookies to the field.<br />
<br />
With a resolutely last place finish, the Cadillac SRX was clobbered over its outward visibility, weight, lack of overall space (despite being the largest of the bunch), and cramped second-row seating. The fact that the Edmund's test car was a base FWD model didn't help either. <br />
<br />
Tied for second place were the GLK350 and Q5, both praised for their power, ride, and handling. The Mercedes came up short in overall utility, while the Audi took some hits for its electric power steering. <br />
<br />
According to the testers, the XC60 "won by a hair" thanks to its generous cargo capacity, second-row comfort, and "safety features galore." While the Swede offered plenty of power, it suffered from poor fuel economy and less-than-satisfying handling. So, how did a not-fun-to-drive Volvo CUV climb to the top of the comparison (one that Edmunds says, "none of our editors would personally choose")? You'll have to <a href="http://blogs.edmunds.com/strategies/2009/08/comparison-test-audi-q5-cadillac-srx-mercedes-benz-glk350-volvo-xc60.html">read their story</a> to find out.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/">2010 Volvo XC60</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/01-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/02-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/03-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/04-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-volvo-xc60/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/05-volvo-xc60_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://blogs.edmunds.com/strategies/2009/08/comparison-test-audi-q5-cadillac-srx-mercedes-benz-glk350-volvo-xc60.html">Edmunds</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/18/edmunds-pans-cadillac-srx-in-new-entry-lux-cuv-comparo-praises/">Edmunds praises Volvo XC60, pans Cadillac SRX in new entry-lux CUV comparo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/18/edmunds-pans-cadillac-srx-in-new-entry-lux-cuv-comparo-praises/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19130948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/18/edmunds-pans-cadillac-srx-in-new-entry-lux-cuv-comparo-praises/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Audi</category><category>Audi Q5</category><category>AudiQ5</category><category>cadillac srx</category><category>cadillac srx plug-in hybrid</category><category>CadillacSrx</category><category>CadillacSrxPlug-inHybrid</category><category>Comparison</category><category>Edmunds</category><category>GLK</category><category>mercedes-benz</category><category>Mercedes-Benz GLK350</category><category>Mercedes-benzGlk350</category><category>Q5</category><category>SRX</category><category>Test</category><category>Winner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: Diesels paying financial dividends back more quickly than hybrids]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/report-diesels-paying-financial-dividends-back-more-quickly-tha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/report-diesels-paying-financial-dividends-back-more-quickly-tha/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/report-diesels-paying-financial-dividends-back-more-quickly-tha/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/diesel/" rel="tag">Diesel</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi-1/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/jetta_tdi_630.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><strong><small>2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></div>
<br /> In the ongoing battle between hybrids and diesels for "payback time" supremacy, the latest round goes to the oil burning posse. That's the report from Edmunds, which did a recent numbers crunch comparing the two fuel-saving drivetrains and found the scales have tipped in favor of diesel powerplants. <br /> <br /> According to the study, the average new vehicle price premium for a hybrid-electric is a whopping $4,981 (the Lexus LS 600h L takes the outlier cherry with a $15,969 premium over its gasoline counterpart). On the other hand, the average diesel premium is only about $2,360 (both figures were calculated after incentives and credits). Last year's high fuel prices have also come down considerably to the point where gasoline and diesel fuel are about the same price. This hurts the hybrid-electric powertrain, which takes advantage of high fuel costs by squeezing more miles out of each dollar's worth of gas for quicker payback.<br /> <br /> Edmunds also did a payback comparison between the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/27/review-2010-toyota-prius-a-miser-with-new-moves/">2010 Toyota Prius</a> and the all-new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/02/review-2010-honda-insight-ex-familiarity-breeds-discontent/">2010 Honda Insight</a>. While the Prius is undeniably clobbering Insight in the sales battle, the website says it will take a sobering 26.2 years of driving to recover the Toyota's $4,030 cost premium. <br /> <br /> [Source: <a href="http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/07/diesels-paying-back-quicker-than-hybrids-edmundscom-reports.html">Auto Observer</a>]<br /> <br /> <br /> <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi-1/low/">2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/09jettatdi_01_hr_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/09jettatdi_02_hr_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/09jettatdi_03_hr_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/09jettatdi_04_hr_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-volkswagen-jetta-tdi-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/09jettatdi_05_hr_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/report-diesels-paying-financial-dividends-back-more-quickly-tha/">REPORT: Diesels paying financial dividends back more quickly than hybrids</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/report-diesels-paying-financial-dividends-back-more-quickly-tha/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19114847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/03/report-diesels-paying-financial-dividends-back-more-quickly-tha/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Comparison</category><category>diesel hybrid</category><category>diesel vs hybrid</category><category>DieselHybrid</category><category>DieselVsHybrid</category><category>Drivetrain</category><category>Fuel-saving</category><category>Honda insight</category><category>HondaInsight</category><category>Hybrid Electric</category><category>HybridElectric</category><category>Powertrain</category><category>prius</category><category>toyota prius</category><category>ToyotaPrius</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retro Comparo: Fourtitude puts S5 against Ur-Quattro]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/retro-comparo-fourtitude-puts-s5-against-ur-quattro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/retro-comparo-fourtitude-puts-s5-against-ur-quattro/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/retro-comparo-fourtitude-puts-s5-against-ur-quattro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a></p><a href="http://www.fourtitude.com/news/publish/Features/article_4773.shtml"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/quattro_vs_s5.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Fourtitude has conjured up an original, red 1985 Audi Quattro and yoked it next to a 2009 S5 to see how the two pull their loads. Of course, with 160 hp, a curb weight of 3,115 pounds (U.S. spec) and 58/42 weight distribution, the original Quattro and its <em>Road &amp; Track</em>-timed run of 8.3 seconds from 0-60 can't compare straight-up with the S5. But historically, the Quattro was the beast that has made the S5 - and perhaps even the RS4 and R8 - a natural progression over Audi's last 27 years.<br /><br />The handmade Quattro cost $5,000 more than a Porsche when it was new, and the few who own them would tell you it was worth it. Yet while the $56,840 S5 has the Quattro beat on numbers, it will be another two decades before we find out if it still has anywhere near the cachet of its ancestor. Click the link for the rest of the story.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.fourtitude.com/news/publish/Features/article_4773.shtml">Fourtitude</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/retro-comparo-fourtitude-puts-s5-against-ur-quattro/">Retro Comparo: Fourtitude puts S5 against Ur-Quattro</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.fourtitude.com/news/publish/Features/article_4773.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/retro-comparo-fourtitude-puts-s5-against-ur-quattro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1500232/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/retro-comparo-fourtitude-puts-s5-against-ur-quattro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>audi</category><category>audi quattro</category><category>AudiQuattro</category><category>comparison</category><category>coupe</category><category>quattro</category><category>s5</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Autoblog Comparo: Moving Mountains - Toyota Landcruiser vs. Hummer H2]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/autoblog-comparo-moving-mountains-toyota-landcruiser-vs-humm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/autoblog-comparo-moving-mountains-toyota-landcruiser-vs-humm/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/autoblog-comparo-moving-mountains-toyota-landcruiser-vs-humm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/garage/" rel="tag">In the Autoblog Garage</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hummer/" rel="tag">Hummer</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/off-road/" rel="tag">Off-Road</a></p><div align="left"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-comparo-h2-vs-landcruiser/1098192/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/h2lc_lead.jpg" /></a><br /> </div>
<div align="center"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><small>Click the image above for high-res gallery of the Autoblog Comparo: H2 vs. Landcruiser</small></span><br /></div>
<br />The world's maddest battles usually earn a brief sobriquet: Red vs. Blue, Holyfield-Tyson, Lingerie Bowl. Although the battle we'll describe today isn't finished, the clash of HUMMER vs. Any Decent Off-roader - especially HUMMER vs. Jeep - has made so much noise on Autoblog alone that we decided it was time to investigate. Not having a Jeep at our disposal, we pitted an H2 against the Toyota Landcruiser on three trails in the California desert to find out if either of them had any quit - or if they'd keep going but complain about it. Follow the jump for the answer we came up with, and check out the gallery of off-road shenanigans below.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-comparo-h2-vs-landcruiser/low/">Autoblog Comparo: H2 vs Landcruiser</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-comparo-h2-vs-landcruiser/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/h2vlc_01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-comparo-h2-vs-landcruiser/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/h2vlc_02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-comparo-h2-vs-landcruiser/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/h2vlc_03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-comparo-h2-vs-landcruiser/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/h2vlc_04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-comparo-h2-vs-landcruiser/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/h2vlc_05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />______________________________________________________<br /><em>This post has been Twittered. <a href="http://twitter.com/therealautoblog">Click here</a> to follow Autoblog on Twitter</em><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/autoblog-comparo-moving-mountains-toyota-landcruiser-vs-humm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Autoblog Comparo: Moving Mountains - Toyota Landcruiser vs. Hummer H2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/autoblog-comparo-moving-mountains-toyota-landcruiser-vs-humm/">Autoblog Comparo: Moving Mountains - Toyota Landcruiser vs. Hummer H2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/autoblog-comparo-moving-mountains-toyota-landcruiser-vs-humm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1319801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/15/autoblog-comparo-moving-mountains-toyota-landcruiser-vs-humm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoblog comparison</category><category>autoblog comparo</category><category>AutoblogComparison</category><category>AutoblogComparo</category><category>comparison</category><category>comparo</category><category>featured</category><category>gm</category><category>h2</category><category>hummer</category><category>hummer h2</category><category>HummerH2</category><category>landcruiser</category><category>suvs</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota landcruiser</category><category>ToyotaLandcruiser</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let there be victory: Hyundai Genesis trumps Lexus GS 350 in comparo]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/20/let-there-be-victory-hyundai-genesis-trumps-lexus-gs-350-in-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/20/let-there-be-victory-hyundai-genesis-trumps-lexus-gs-350-in-com/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/20/let-there-be-victory-hyundai-genesis-trumps-lexus-gs-350-in-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lifestyle/" rel="tag">Lifestyle</a></p><a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=130686?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.*"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/hyundai_vs_gs350_inside.jpg" /></a><br /><br />InsideLine, no strangers to luxury, recently put the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/27/first-drive-2009-hyundai-genesis/">Hyundai Genesis</a> up against the kind of competition the Korean automaker wants to be associated with: the Lexus GS 350. The GS 300 first came out in 1993 and had the luxury re-defining LS and ES for siblings; at the time, Hyundai was still making do with Excel, Sonata, and Scoupe, and parking any of them next to a Lexus would have laid bare the gulf. Now the marques are going head-to-head. This, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call progress. <br /><br />Still, issues of cost -- and perception -- skew the comparison slightly. The V8 Hyundai goes up against a V6 Lexus, because adding two more cylinders to the Lexus would have meant a $12,000 difference. As it is, there's still almost $8,000 between them. And there's the fact that the Lexus and the Hyundai don't exactly compete with each other (we'd have thought an ES comparo would make more sense) in brief, either.<br /><br />Nevertheless, it's not a bad bout, and it turns out to be one of the closest fights InsideLine has ever judged. The Lexus gets a win-by-a-nose for things like fit and finish and speed, while the Hyundai returns the favor in the highway performance and space issues. The flying H takes home the silverware by a mere two points, aided in part by the price advantage -- which, as far as Hyundai's concerned, is the point. Follow the link for the full story. <em>Thanks for the tip, Charles!</em><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=130686?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.*">Inside Line</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/20/let-there-be-victory-hyundai-genesis-trumps-lexus-gs-350-in-com/">Let there be victory: Hyundai Genesis trumps Lexus GS 350 in comparo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=130686?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.*>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/20/let-there-be-victory-hyundai-genesis-trumps-lexus-gs-350-in-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1290317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/20/let-there-be-victory-hyundai-genesis-trumps-lexus-gs-350-in-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comparison</category><category>genesis</category><category>gs 350</category><category>Gs350</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai genesis</category><category>hyundai vs lexus</category><category>HyundaiGenesis</category><category>HyundaiVsLexus</category><category>lexus</category><category>lexus gs 350</category><category>LexusGs350</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM backs off in-store Malibu vs. Camry comparos]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/02/gm-backs-off-in-store-malibu-vs-camry-comparos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/02/gm-backs-off-in-store-malibu-vs-camry-comparos/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/02/gm-backs-off-in-store-malibu-vs-camry-comparos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/31/autos/gm_vs_camry_accord_not/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/malibultz_new.jpg" /></a><br /><br />When news came <a href="http://blogsmith.aol.com/content/posts/edit/979513/">back in May</a> that GM would encourage Chevy dealers to have a Camry on hand for customers to compare directly to the forthcoming Malibu, we lauded the company for walking the walk. Similarly confident in the Saturn Aura, the General ran a program earlier this summer in which Aura shoppers were offered comparison drives in both the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry. According to GM, the Saturn program was a success, and Aura sales rose during the promotion. Despite that, the Malibu vs. Camry deathmatch is now officially DOA. <br /><br />No specific reason has been given for the change of heart. A GM spokesperson says only that "it's been off the table for quite some time" and that "it wasn't the best approach" for the Malibu. The (undoubtedly significant) costs associated placing comparison vehicles in the 4,000+ Chevy dealers was said to not be a factor in the decision.<br /><br />[Source: CNNMoney]<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-chevy-malibu-1/low/">2008 Chevy Malibu</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-chevy-malibu-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/12/08_malibu_hr_05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-chevy-malibu-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/12/08_malibu_hr_06_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-chevy-malibu-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/12/08_malibu_hr_07_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-chevy-malibu-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/12/08_malibu_hr_08_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-chevy-malibu-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/12/08_malibu_hr_09_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/02/gm-backs-off-in-store-malibu-vs-camry-comparos/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM backs off in-store Malibu vs. Camry comparos</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/02/gm-backs-off-in-store-malibu-vs-camry-comparos/">GM backs off in-store Malibu vs. Camry comparos</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/31/autos/gm_vs_camry_accord_not/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/02/gm-backs-off-in-store-malibu-vs-camry-comparos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/979513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/02/gm-backs-off-in-store-malibu-vs-camry-comparos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accord</category><category>camry</category><category>comparison</category><category>malibu</category><category>malibu campaign</category><category>MalibuCampaign</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports responds to pickup comparo controversy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/10/consumer-reports-responds-to-pickup-comparo-controversy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/10/consumer-reports-responds-to-pickup-comparo-controversy/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/10/consumer-reports-responds-to-pickup-comparo-controversy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="281" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/pickups_silverado_tundra.jpg" /><br /><br />Earlier this week we told you about a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/06/consumer-reports-rates-half-ton-pickups-raises-eyebrows/">pickup truck comparison</a> in the most recent issue of Consumer Reports that seemed a bit fishy. The comparison pitted the new 2007 Toyota Tundra against the 2007 Chevy Silverado, Ford F-150 and Dodge Ram. It was clearly a fight between the Tundra and Silverado from the get-go, since both were the only two completely new trucks in the test. The Tundra, however, seemed to have an advantage in that it was ordered up with the larger of its two engines, the 5.7L V8 producing 381 hp. The Silverado, while available with a more evenly matched 6.0L Vortec MAX V8, was ordered with a less powerful 5.3L V8 producing 315 hp. Not only that, but the Tundra benefited from a 4.30 rear axle ratio that provides better towing and acceleration than the 3.73 ratio in the Silverado, which sacrifices those qualities for better fuel economy. The Silverado, however, could've been ordered with a more comparable 4.10 rear axle ratio at no extra charge. <br /><br />Well, the gentlefolks at CR recently posted an answer to everyone's questions about this particular half-ton pickup comparo on their blog, which you should go read by clicking <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/pickup-truck-te.html">here</a> before going on. They explain that choosing equipment for vehicles involved in a comparison is a tricky thing that involves balancing the objective of several goals. <br /><br /><em>"In general, we want to test a representative vehicle that is comparable to other vehicles in the test group (and previously tested peer vehicles). We also typically test the version--powertrain and trim level--that most regular consumers will buy. "<br /><br /></em>Read on after the jump to hear our take on CR's explanation.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/10/consumer-reports-responds-to-pickup-comparo-controversy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Reports responds to pickup comparo controversy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/10/consumer-reports-responds-to-pickup-comparo-controversy/">Consumer Reports responds to pickup comparo controversy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/pickup-truck-te.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/10/consumer-reports-responds-to-pickup-comparo-controversy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/962624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/10/consumer-reports-responds-to-pickup-comparo-controversy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevy silverado</category><category>ChevySilverado</category><category>comparison</category><category>comparo</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>CR</category><category>half-ton</category><category>half-ton pickups</category><category>half-ton trucks</category><category>Half-tonPickups</category><category>Half-tonTrucks</category><category>silverado</category><category>toyota tundra</category><category>ToyotaTundra</category><category>tundra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pickuptruck.com hosts Heavy Duty Truck Shootout to end all shootouts]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/03/pickuptruck-com-hosts-heavy-duty-truck-shootout-to-end-all-shoot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/03/pickuptruck-com-hosts-heavy-duty-truck-shootout-to-end-all-shoot/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/03/pickuptruck-com-hosts-heavy-duty-truck-shootout-to-end-all-shoot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2007/shootout/hdshootout1.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/threequartertons.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />Mike Levine from PickupTruck.com is our go-to guy for truck news. His brain is like the bed of a Ford F-450 filled with the esoteric details of heavy duty diesel pickups and 3/4-ton gassers. Plus, he's from the old school of automotive journalism and has made a successful transition to the web, which means his reporting is always knowledgeable and balanced despite it being delivered digitally. When Levine told us he was planning on doing a comprehensive comparo of today's heavy duty pickups, however, we were unprepared for the depth of the final product. <br /><br />The 2007 PickupTruck.com Heavy Duty Shootout pits six HD pickups from Chevy/GMC, Ford and Dodge against each other on a totally level and unbiased playing field. Levine went so far as to hire a third-party company to perform all of the instrumented testing to remove any trace of subjectivity in the results. The players are three gas-powered 3/4-ton pickups including the 2007 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT Quad Cab 4x4, 2008 Ford F-250 FX4 Super Duty Crew Cab 4x4 and 2007 GMC Sierra 2500 HD SLE Crew Cab 4x4, and three diesel-powered one-ton pickups including the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 LT Crew Cab 4x4, 2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT Quad Cab 4x4 and 2008 Ford F-350 King Ranch Super Duty Crew Cab 4x4. Ford also threw in a 2008 Ford F-450 Lariat Super Duty Crew Cab 4x4 so that Levine and his team could attempt to prove how powerful this big rig really is. <br /><br />We've just finished reading Part 1 and 2 of the three-part series, which includes an extremely knowledgeable and fact-filled introduction as well as the first battery of tests, including a "squat" test and 1/4-mile performance runs. Each part may appear like a lot to read, but we flew threw it faster than an unloaded GMC Sierra 2500 through the quarter mile. <br /><br />Check out Part 1 <a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2007/shootout/hdshootout1.html">here</a> and click <a href="http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2007/shootout/hdshootout1milan.html ">here</a> for Part 2. The final installment should be out sometime this week, and we'll be eager to find out definitively which of these pickups outperformed its competitors in PickupTruck.com's battle royale of heavy duty trucks.<br /><br />[Source: PickupTruck.com]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/03/pickuptruck-com-hosts-heavy-duty-truck-shootout-to-end-all-shoot/">Pickuptruck.com hosts Heavy Duty Truck Shootout to end all shootouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2007/shootout/hdshootout1.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/03/pickuptruck-com-hosts-heavy-duty-truck-shootout-to-end-all-shoot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/931468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/03/pickuptruck-com-hosts-heavy-duty-truck-shootout-to-end-all-shoot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comparison</category><category>comparo</category><category>cummins</category><category>diesel</category><category>duramax</category><category>gas</category><category>haul</category><category>HD</category><category>heavy duty</category><category>HeavyDuty</category><category>pickuptruck.com</category><category>powerstroke</category><category>super duty</category><category>SuperDuty</category><category>tow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Saturn dealers to offer Camry, Accord drives to Aura shoppers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/10/saturn-dealers-to-offer-camry-accord-drives-to-aura-shoppers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/10/saturn-dealers-to-offer-camry-accord-drives-to-aura-shoppers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/10/saturn-dealers-to-offer-camry-accord-drives-to-aura-shoppers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a></p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601209&amp;sid=aVCBQNN3j_zM&amp;refer=transportation"><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="386" border="0" align="top" alt="2007 Saturn Aura XR" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/2007_saturnauraxr_an.jpg" /></a><br /><br />The reinvigorated Saturn is one of the best things GM's got going right now. May 2007 sales were up 68% over the previous year (what a difference appealing product makes), and overall, it's up 30% YTD versus 2006. <br /><br />Now comes word from <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601209&amp;sid=aVCBQNN3j_zM&amp;refer=transportation"><span style="font-style: italic;">Bloomberg News</span></a> that starting tomorrow, June 11, all but 5 of the 430 Saturn dealers in the US will offer prospective Aura shoppers comparison test drives in the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry. According to Saturn's Lisa Hutchinson, its participating dealers are buying the imports that'll be used for the program, which runs through July 31. GM's showing a lot of confidence in its new products -- remember, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/14/chevy-dealers-told-to-get-a-camry-to-sell-their-malibus/">Chevy dealers will have Camrys</a> on the floor to compare to the new Malibu when it arrives, too. This is all good, and it could probably be even better. Follow the jump for a bit of editorializing.<br /><br />[Source: Bloomberg News]<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-garage-2007-saturn-aura-xr/low/">2007 Saturn Aura XR - In the Autoblog Garage</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-garage-2007-saturn-aura-xr/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/abgarage_07aurasticker_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-garage-2007-saturn-aura-xr/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/abgarage_07aura_02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-garage-2007-saturn-aura-xr/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/abgarage_07aura_03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-garage-2007-saturn-aura-xr/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/abgarage_07aura_04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-garage-2007-saturn-aura-xr/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/abgarage_07aura_06_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-saturn-aura-green-line/low/">2007 Saturn Aura Geen Line</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-saturn-aura-green-line/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/auragl_apn_june2007001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-saturn-aura-green-line/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/auragl_apn_june2007002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-saturn-aura-green-line/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/auragl_apn_june2007003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-saturn-aura-green-line/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/auragl_apn_june2007004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-saturn-aura-green-line/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/auragl_apn_june2007005_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/10/saturn-dealers-to-offer-camry-accord-drives-to-aura-shoppers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Saturn dealers to offer Camry, Accord drives to Aura shoppers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/10/saturn-dealers-to-offer-camry-accord-drives-to-aura-shoppers/">Saturn dealers to offer Camry, Accord drives to Aura shoppers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601209&amp;sid=aVCBQNN3j_zM&amp;refer=transportation>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/10/saturn-dealers-to-offer-camry-accord-drives-to-aura-shoppers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/914374/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/10/saturn-dealers-to-offer-camry-accord-drives-to-aura-shoppers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accord</category><category>aura</category><category>camry</category><category>comparison</category><category>saturn dealers</category><category>SaturnDealers</category><category>test drives</category><category>TestDrives</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Winding Road invents "Speed per Dollar" index]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/winding-road-invents-speed-per-dollar-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/winding-road-invents-speed-per-dollar-index/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/winding-road-invents-speed-per-dollar-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><p><a href="http://news.windingroad.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/speed-per-dollar-index-lg.jpg"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/winding_road_chart.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><em>click image above to enlarge</em></p>
<p><span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"> <script> var digg_url = 'http://www.digg.com/design/Car_buffs_How_good_is_your_car_Calculate_its_Speed_Per_Dollar_and_find_out'; </script> <script src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>The good boffins at Winding Road have come up with a metric called Speed per Dollar (SpD). Its aim is to put straight-line vehicle performance into an easy-to-understand financial perspective. In light of the monetary component, the best and worst SpD ratings among the sample cars tested aren't entirely surprising: Ariel Atom at the top, Bugatti Veyron at the bottom. Supercars -- and their super prices -- would of course fare poorly. However the Mazdaspeed 3, with "just" 263 hp, climbs up the charts to score second place. As Winding Road admits, the chart doesn't take handling (or luxury or Making the Jones' Jealous) into account. But Autobloggers (and Winding Roaders, we're sure) are hugely interested in price-for-performance, and this is a novel new way to compare speedsters. Let the calculations, comparisons, and commentary begin.</p>
<p>[Source: Winding Road]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/winding-road-invents-speed-per-dollar-index/">Winding Road invents "Speed per Dollar" index</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.windingroad.com/gadgets/a-new-performance-paradigm-the-speed-per-dollar-index/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/winding-road-invents-speed-per-dollar-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/908275/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/winding-road-invents-speed-per-dollar-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chart</category><category>comparison</category><category>graph</category><category>road</category><category>speed-per-dollar</category><category>winding</category><category>winding road</category><category>WindingRoad</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota Tundra beats Chevy Silverado in Edmunds comparo]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/24/toyota-tundra-beats-chevy-silverado-in-edmunds-comparo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/24/toyota-tundra-beats-chevy-silverado-in-edmunds-comparo/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/24/toyota-tundra-beats-chevy-silverado-in-edmunds-comparo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=119281"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/06.comparo.halftontr_450.jpg" /></a><br /><br />This is what we're truly all waiting for - someone to get their hands on the best-of-the-best pickups for 2007 and stage a knock down, drag out comparison test with the new 2007 Toyota Tundra. Well, Edmunds has come closest by being the first to compare the new Tundra with a 2007 Chevy Silverado and an '07 Nissan Titan. While we really want to see a Tundra vs. Silverado vs. F-150 vs. Ram match, we'll take what we can get. <br />Much to our surprise after seeing the Tundra in person at the Detroit Auto Show, Edmunds chose it as the winner of its half-ton comparison test by a slim margin over the Silverado. The Edmunds editors seemed to like the Tundra's styling and love its 381-hp 5.7L V8, but like us were not impressed with the interior. The Silverado, meanwhile, was impressive in all areas except for drivetrain. It's 6.0L V8 was less powerful than the Tundra's motor, and a trip to the dyno revealed a quirky fuel management trick that hampers the Silverado's power delivery for four seconds when the throttle is mashed. Only after four-seconds of full-throttle has elapsed does the Silverado produce its advertised power numbers. As it turns out, the fact that the Tundra's big motor and slick six-speed could haul it to 60 mph in only 6.3 seconds was the ultimate deciding factor. Toyota's big T just brought more power to the table. <br /><br />The three year-old Titan never stood a chance and brought up the rear. <br /><br />Do we agree with Edmunds? Having never driven the Tundra, it's hard to say. We're convinced at this point that the Tundra's mechanicals aren't as beefy as the domestics', but its engine is a force to be reckoned with. However, we were so disappointed with the interior design and fit and finish of the Tundra we saw in Detroit, that we'd still probably pick the Silverado in this instance. <br /><br />Click the read link to review the comparo and also see a video of it produced by Edmunds. <br /><br />[Source: Edmunds]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/24/toyota-tundra-beats-chevy-silverado-in-edmunds-comparo/">Toyota Tundra beats Chevy Silverado in Edmunds comparo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=119281>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/24/toyota-tundra-beats-chevy-silverado-in-edmunds-comparo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/741839/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/24/toyota-tundra-beats-chevy-silverado-in-edmunds-comparo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comparison</category><category>edmunds</category><category>review</category><category>silverado</category><category>test</category><category>titan</category><category>tundra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Concept to Production: '05 Lincoln Aviator to '07 Lincoln MKX]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/14/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/14/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/14/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/conceptcars/" rel="tag">Concept Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/"><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="461" border="0" align="top" alt="Aviator Concept/MKX"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/aviator_mkx_comparo.jpg" /></a><br /><em>Click image for high-res comparison gallery</em><br /><br />Attending a show always gets us thinking about concept cars and how they'll wind up translating into real in-the-showroom and on-the-road vehicles. This week, all the talk was about cars like Ford's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-interceptor-concept/">Interceptor</a>, Lincoln's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lincoln-mkr-concept/">MKR</a>, Chevy's <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/photos/chevy-volt-concept-1/">Volt,</a> Mazda's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mazda-ryuga-concept/">Ryuga</a> and Nissan's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/nissan-bevel/">Bevel</a>, for example. The extent to which any or all of those will influence future production vehicles remains to be seen.<br /><br />It's when new models are on the stands that we can look back and compare. This year, Lincoln's MKX is in showrooms, and we're now able to look back at the concept car that clearly showed the world what was coming. That would be the 2005 Lincoln Aviator (which shared its name with the Explorer-based production vehicle), and aside from some detail changes, it's pretty much the MKX we all see today. <br /><br />The concept's leaner-looking -- something that didn't carry over as well to the production car. The MKX's more sedate interior trim is much more appealing than the blinged-out chrome look the cabin of the Aviator concept sported. Our feeling is that the Aviator's big wheels and hood-ornament look better than the smaller rollers and integrated grille badge on the production car.  We also prefer the thicker c-pillar and rear-end treatment of the concept, but we know as well as anyone that you're going to lose something when you go to production, and that rear looked like it didn't have much of a chance.<br /><br />Given the trade-offs that were made, the transformation from Aviator Concept to MKX worked out okay. Yes, we're aware that it's an alternately-styled Ford Edge, but the style it <em>has</em> works well. Check out the <strong><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/">comparison gallery</a></strong> we put together and let us know what you think. We just wish they'd have kept the old name. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/135321/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/aviator_to_mkr_lr_10_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/135325/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/aviator_to_mkr_lr_14_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/135324/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/aviator_to_mkr_lr_13_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/135313/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/aviator_to_mkr_lr_02_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/135316/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/aviator_to_mkr_lr_05_thumbnail.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />[Photos: Ford]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/14/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/">Concept to Production: '05 Lincoln Aviator to '07 Lincoln MKX</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/14/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/735672/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/14/concept-to-production-05-lincoln-aviator-to-07-lincoln-mkx/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2005 aviator concept</category><category>2005AviatorConcept</category><category>2007 mkx</category><category>2007Mkx</category><category>aviator</category><category>comparison</category><category>mkx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MINI Cooper takes on a Porsche GT3 and a Champ Car]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/mini-cooper-takes-on-a-porsche-gt3-and-a-champ-car/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/mini-cooper-takes-on-a-porsche-gt3-and-a-champ-car/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/mini-cooper-takes-on-a-porsche-gt3-and-a-champ-car/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoracingdaily.com/article.php?cid=15128"><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/2006-spa-mini-porsche.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></a>Now we've seen some interesting races before, but this is something new: the Team Australia Speed Comparison, to be held in conjunction with the Lexmark Indy 300 later this month in Australia, will pit a MINI against a Porsche and a Champ Car. </p>
<p>The John Cooper Works MINI Cooper S packs a supercharged 1.6-liter four with 210 hp and runs 0-60 in 6.6 seconds; the 400-hp Porsche 911 GT3 reaches 60 in 3.2 seconds; and the Champ Car, packing a 750-hp Cosworth V8, will hit it in a cant 2.2 seconds. Sounds like a fight about as fair as David and Goliath, with The Rock thrown in for good measure.</p>
<p>Of course it's not a straight-up race, or anybody could predict the outcome - it's a single-lap handicap race: the MINI will head out first, followed by the Porsche and then the Champ Car. The starts are timed according to the car's capabilities so that, technically, all three cars should cross the finish line at the same time. </p>
<p>Gentlemen, start your engines!</p>
<p>[Source: Auto Racing Daily]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/mini-cooper-takes-on-a-porsche-gt3-and-a-champ-car/">MINI Cooper takes on a Porsche GT3 and a Champ Car</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoracingdaily.com/article.php?cid=15128>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/mini-cooper-takes-on-a-porsche-gt3-and-a-champ-car/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/680557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/06/mini-cooper-takes-on-a-porsche-gt3-and-a-champ-car/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>911</category><category>australia</category><category>champ</category><category>comparison</category><category>cooper</category><category>gt3</category><category>indy</category><category>john</category><category>lexmark</category><category>mini</category><category>porsche</category><category>race</category><category>speed</category><category>works</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six tested 2006 convertibles so you don't have to]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/six-tested-2006-convertibles-so-you-dont-have-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/six-tested-2006-convertibles-so-you-dont-have-to/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/six-tested-2006-convertibles-so-you-dont-have-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/saab/" rel="tag">Saab</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a></p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14985640.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/2006-pontiac-g6-convertible-ii.jpg" id="vimage_2" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Poor Matt Nauman. The <em>Mercury News</em> reporter tested six 2006 convertibles in recent months while the weather, he writes, was "perfect". His impressions of the convertibles include:<br /><br /><em>2006 Volvo C70 convertible</em><br />Nauman found it quite roomy for four while the turbo-charged engine made Sunday driving energetic. A low whir sound, which may have come from the hardtop, prove to be annoying.<br /><br /><em>2006 Pontiac G6 GTP convertible </em>(pictured)<br />Nauman felt Pontiac's newest vehicle to be as solid as the C70, which he found surprising. Annoyances he found included the plasticky interior and the 2.2-cubic-feet of truck space when the hardtop was down.<br /><br /><em>2007 Jaguar XK8 convertible</em><br />He found the six-speed and 300-horsepower, 4.2-liter V8 engine to be "decent". The soft-top folded in 18 seconds.<br /><br /><em>2006 Mini Cooper S convertible</em><br />Nauman drove the limited full-tilt S model with John Cooper tuning kit. His enthusiasm over the Mini's style, design, and driving character marked him a fan.<br /><br /><em>2006 Honda S2000 roadster</em><br />Nauman admits he could never find a comfortable position in the S2000 despite being able to fit in the MX-5, Z4, and Solstice. He still found the convertible amazing to drive especially when hitting the corners.<br /><br /><em>2006 Saab 9-3 2.0T convertible</em><br />He found the Saab's design "dignified", while the turbo-charged engine made driving moderately fun. <br /><br />We're particularly interested in trying out the Pontiac G6 GTP convertible for ourselves, as it appears the car's svelty styling and trick hardtop can't shake its cheap interior and low utility. <br /><br />[Source: Mercury News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/six-tested-2006-convertibles-so-you-dont-have-to/">Six tested 2006 convertibles so you don't have to</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 08 Jul 2006 17:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14985640.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/six-tested-2006-convertibles-so-you-dont-have-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/640714/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/six-tested-2006-convertibles-so-you-dont-have-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comparison</category><category>impressions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lux Battle Royale as new Jaguar XK8 takes on BMW 650i]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/lux-battle-royale-as-new-jaguar-xk8-takes-on-bmw-650i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/lux-battle-royale-as-new-jaguar-xk8-takes-on-bmw-650i/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/lux-battle-royale-as-new-jaguar-xk8-takes-on-bmw-650i/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/contests/" rel="tag">Contests</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a></p><em><a href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20060707005077&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/07/bmw.jaguar.340.jpg" id="vimage_2" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Inside Line</em> has published a comparo of the new 2007 Jaguar XK8 Coupe and the 2007 BMW 650i. The $86,125 (MSRP) Jag comes armed with a 300-horsepower, 4.2-liter V8 engine and a six-speed automatic transmission, while the BMW 650i is equipped with a similar six-speed automatic transmission, but with a 360-horsepower, 4.4-liter V8 engine. The BMW's price, meanwhile, was lower at $81,140 MSRP.<br /><br />This Jaguar is the brand's latest salvo in its battle against obsolescence in the super luxury segment. <em>Inside Line</em> found the coupe "drop-dead gorgeous" and commented that it offered plenty of luxurious comfort. Unfortunately for the venerable cat, the 650i beat it in virtually every other category with a better backseat, more truck space, and superior fit and finish, all for a lower asking price than the Jaguar.<br /><br />Full details can be found at the link. <br /><br />[Source: Inside Line via Business Wire]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/lux-battle-royale-as-new-jaguar-xk8-takes-on-bmw-650i/">Lux Battle Royale as new Jaguar XK8 takes on BMW 650i</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 08 Jul 2006 12:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20060707005077&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/lux-battle-royale-as-new-jaguar-xk8-takes-on-bmw-650i/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/640709/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/08/lux-battle-royale-as-new-jaguar-xk8-takes-on-bmw-650i/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007 BMW 650i</category><category>2007 Jaguar XK8</category><category>2007JaguarXk8</category><category>comparison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 12:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fusion knocks out Camry in Lienert review]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/fusion-knocks-out-camry-in-lienert-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/fusion-knocks-out-camry-in-lienert-review/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/fusion-knocks-out-camry-in-lienert-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/contests/" rel="tag">Contests</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060503/AUTO03/605030329/1149"><img width="450" vspace="4"hspace="4" height="294" border="0" align="top" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/fusion-camry.jpg" alt=""/></a><br /><br />Husband-and-wife team Paul and Anita Lienert compared the two popular mid-sized sedans and, to theirapparent surprise, the Fusion came out on top.<br /><br />The two tied in exterior sheetmetal, with the Fusionappealing to those who like bling, bold, and American. The Camry, due to its redesign, moved up a segment for thosedesiring near-Lexus looks without the price tag. But the Fusion then proceeded to stomp Toyota's best-seller insubsequent rounds. The Lienerts were shocked at the lack of fit and finish in the Camry, the automaker's usual strongpoint. <br /><br />Fusion then drove all over the Camry in the categories of ride, handling, and value. At a similarprice, Ford's offspring offered a 221 horsepower 3.0-litre V-6 coupled with a six-speed automatic to the Camry'srespectable 158-horsepower 2.4-litre I4 and its five-speed automatic. Agility? The Fusion is a driver's dream next tothe oh-so comfortable Camry thanks to the sporty Mazda6 platform that underpins it. Only in safety features did theCamry score its lone win, offering airbags, side curtains, and many other features that cost extra in the Fusion. Thatwon't be the case, however, for the 2007 model year as the Fusion will soon have those safety features standard.<br/><br />[Source: Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/fusion-knocks-out-camry-in-lienert-review/">Fusion knocks out Camry in Lienert review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 04 May 2006 12:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060503/AUTO03/605030329/1149>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/fusion-knocks-out-camry-in-lienert-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/614783/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/fusion-knocks-out-camry-in-lienert-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Camry</category><category>comparison</category><category>Fusion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 12:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Camaro Concept versus Mustang debate goes digital]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/01/camaro-concept-versus-mustang-debate-goes-digital/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/01/camaro-concept-versus-mustang-debate-goes-digital/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/01/camaro-concept-versus-mustang-debate-goes-digital/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.carsim.com/mt/animations_mt.php"><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="272" border="0"align="top" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/slalom.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Many of us have alreadytaken in Motor Trend's May issue cover story in which an impatient MT staff pits Chevy's Camaro Concept,not due out until 2008 if at all, against the Ford Mustang in a digital duel. The comparison occurred in a virtualworld created by a simulation program called <a href="http://www.carsim.com/">CarSim</a>. While data on theactually-in-existence Ford Mustang was easy to come by, editors from MT has to consult with GM to cull information onthe 2009 Camaro to use in the simulation. <br /><br />For those who find reading about the comparison a bitone-dimensional, both <a href="http://www.carsim.com/mt/animations_mt.php">CarSim</a> and <ahref="http://www.motortrend.com/multimedia/animations/112_0605_virtual_road_test_animations/">MotorTrend</a> haveloaded up their websites with not only animations of the comparison, but also a mini-app called SurfAnim that allowsone to zoom, fly around and see the tests performed in slow-motion.<br /><br />[Source: CarSim and Motor Trend]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/01/camaro-concept-versus-mustang-debate-goes-digital/">Camaro Concept versus Mustang debate goes digital</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.carsim.com/mt/animations_mt.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/01/camaro-concept-versus-mustang-debate-goes-digital/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/613563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/01/camaro-concept-versus-mustang-debate-goes-digital/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battle</category><category>Camaro Concept</category><category>CamaroConcept</category><category>CarSim</category><category>comparison</category><category>comparo</category><category>duel</category><category>Motor Trend</category><category>MotorTrend</category><category>Mustang</category><category>road test</category><category>RoadTest</category><category>simulation</category><category>versus</category><category>virtual</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>