<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Class action suit alleges BMW N54 turbo engine unsafe, causes Unintended Deceleration]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-bmw-335i/"><img hspace="0" height="418" border="1" width="630" vspace="4" alt="2010 BMW 335i " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/lead1bmw335ireview2010.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><b><i><small>2010 BMW 335i - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></i></b></div>
<div><br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/2008-international-engine-of-the-year-awards-announced/">award-winning BMW N54 inline-six</a> has been a hit around the world since it made its debut in the 2006 E90 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/3+series">335i</a>. The twin-turbocharged engine produces around 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque and many have actually suggested that the Bavarian automaker's power figures have been conservative. When it came out, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/bmw/">BMW</a> promised this engine would virtually eliminate turbo lag, increase performance and improve fuel economy at the same time. In fact, it was so confident in its new engine that it spread it around, adding it to its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/1+series">1</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/3+series">3</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/5+series">5 Series</a> cars, along with its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/z4">Z4 sports cars</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/x6">X6 crossovers</a>.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, the N54 has also seen its fair share of owner complaints. Most notably, unhappy BMW drivers allege having two very important issues with the w&uuml;ndermill; the high-pressure fuel pump has a very high failure rate and a defect in the design of the turbochargers requires they be tweaked so as not to run at full capacity. Many BMW owners have officially had it with the N54 engine and a class-action lawsuit has kicked into gear.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/#continued"><strong>Read the rest after the jump</strong></a>...</div>
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-bmw-335i">Review: 2010 BMW 335i Sedan</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-bmw-335i/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/01bmw335ireview2010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-bmw-335i/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/02bmw335ireview2010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-bmw-335i/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/03bmw335ireview2010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-bmw-335i/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/04bmw335ireview2010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-bmw-335i/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/05bmw335ireview2010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<b><small>Photos by Zach Bowman / Copyright (C)2010 AOL<br />
</small><br />
</b> [Sources: <a href="http://www.kcrlegal.com/">Kershaw, Cutter and Ratinoff, LLC</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bimmerfest.com/news/489840/kershaw,-cutter-&amp;-ratinoff-takes-on-bmw-in-class-action-suit-regarding-defective-fuel">BimmerFest</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/autos/BMW-lawsuit-sudden-engine-power-failure-class-action/19665321/">Daily Finance</a>]
<div> </div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Class action suit alleges BMW N54 turbo engine unsafe, causes Unintended Deceleration</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/">Class action suit alleges BMW N54 turbo engine unsafe, causes Unintended Deceleration</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bimmerfest.com/news/489840/kershaw,-cutter-&amp;-ratinoff-takes-on-bmw-in-class-action-suit-regarding-defective-fuel>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19669998/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bmw</category><category>bmw 335</category><category>BMW 335i</category><category>bmw lawsuit</category><category>bmw n54</category><category>BMW reliability</category><category>class action</category><category>class-action lawsuit</category><category>Class-actionLawsuit</category><category>Cutter and Ratinoff</category><category>inline-six</category><category>Kershaw</category><category>Kershaw Cutter and Ratinoff</category><category>n54</category><category>Turbo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19669998/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/10/12/class-action-suit-alleges-bmw-n54-turbo-engine-unsafe-causes-un/19669998/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19669998</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/lead1bmw335ireview2010_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Automakers to face $2B class-action for Canadian price discrepancies]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=d6db47d3-ab3b-4e0b-bfe8-9c076c593bc2&amp;k=57065&amp;p=1"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/76983077_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />A few days ago we posted on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/23/canadian-loonie-reaches-parity-with-u-s-dollar-so-why-are-cana/">price discrepancy</a> between identical vehicles sold in the U.S. and Canada. The discrepancy was always there, but became apparent when the value of the Canadian Loonie reached parity with the U.S. dollar recently. It was then that consumers couldn't ignore the fact that they were paying more for vehicles than their U.S. neighbors, up to 38% in some cases. <br /><br />The Toronto-based class-action lawsuit firm Juroviesky and Ricci is taking up the case and expected to file a $2 billion class-action suit on behalf of four Canadians who feel that they paid more for their cars than they would have in the U.S. The class-action suit is open to any Canadian consumer who bought a new vehicle between August, 2005 and August, 2007 when the Canadian dollar was rapidly appreciating, but the prices of Canadian cars weren't adjusting. <br /><br />Thanks for the tip, SS3!<br /><br />[Source: Canada.com, photo by KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Automakers to face $2B class-action for Canadian price discrepancies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/">Automakers to face $2B class-action for Canadian price discrepancies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=d6db47d3-ab3b-4e0b-bfe8-9c076c593bc2&amp;k=57065&amp;p=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/998894/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automakers</category><category>Canada U.S. price discrepancy</category><category>CanadaU.s.PriceDiscrepancy</category><category>class-action</category><category>class-action lawsuit</category><category>Class-actionLawsuit</category><category>loonie</category><category>price discrepancy</category><category>PriceDiscrepancy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/998894/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/09/26/automakers-to-face-2b-class-action-for-canadian-price-discrepan/998894/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>998894</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/76983077_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM sued over inaccurate speedometers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003596768_gmlawsuit02m.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/gmc-dash.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Looks like General Motors might be facing a class-action lawsuit over faulty speedometers. The <em>Seattle Times</em> is reporting a couple of owners have had the speedos in their GM SUVs give out, costing anywhere from $100 to $427.50 to replace. Kevin Zwicker was one such owner with a 2004 Chevy Suburban that showed he was going 10 mph while he was driving along with traffic on Interstate 5. He had to be going at least 50. By April 2006, the gauge quit altogether, but because he was past the 36,000-mile warranty limit, he had to use his extended warranty to get it replaced for just $100. <br /><br />According to <em>The Times</em>, Zwicker is now the lead plaintiff in a federal lawsuit that seeks damages on behalf of those affected by such problems. This could amount to thousands of drivers. The lawsuit would apply to all Washington residents with 2003 through 2007 model year GM trucks and SUVs who have had to replace their speedometers. Although Zwicker's lawsuit is limited to Washington, another nearly identical lawsuit was filed in Oregon on behalf of John Hall.<br /><br />Thanks for the tip, Stedwoo!<br /><br />[Source: The Seattle Times]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM sued over inaccurate speedometers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/">GM sued over inaccurate speedometers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003596768_gmlawsuit02m.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/845779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Beth Terrell</category><category>BethTerrell</category><category>class-action lawsuit</category><category>Class-actionLawsuit</category><category>John Hall</category><category>JohnHall</category><category>Kevin Zwicker</category><category>KevinZwicker</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>speedometer error</category><category>SpeedometerError</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/845779/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/03/05/gm-sued-over-inaccurate-speedometers/845779/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>845779</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/03/gmc-dash_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>