<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Guide, Edmunds review Honda Fit]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/03/honda-fit-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/03/honda-fit-reviewed/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/03/honda-fit-reviewed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/New/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/39183/Act/Showall/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/hondafit.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Both <a href="http://auto.consumerguide.com/">Consumer Guide</a> and <a href="http://www.edmunds.com">Edmunds</a> have published new reviews of the Honda Fit, which went on sale this weekend.<br />
<br />
The Consumer Guide report found the tested Sport's version to be comfortable for the vehicle's class. Steering was surprisingly agile, though there was some body lean. The 109 horsepower engine definitely required planning on the driver's part when making a lane change. Driver seating, interestingly enough, is actually higher than the bigger Civic model. <br />
<br />
The Edmund review found a surprising amount of room inside despite the exterior's diminutive dimensions. Part of this is due to the vehicle's fuel tank placement. Their staffers <em>really</em> liked the reclining rear-seat headrests. As for driving, testers liked the manual shifter, though the automatic version seemed to have more 'zip' than its self-shift sibling. Testers also found the Fit to be balanced and stable on the road and track (similar to the Consumer Guide report). Their biggest complaint was the 10.8 gallon fuel tank, though the Fit did average 32 miles per gallon. <br />
<br />
Full details can be found <a href="http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/New/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/39183/Act/Showall/">here</a> (Consumer Guide) and <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=109810">here</a> (Edmunds). Additional Autoblog coverage can also be found <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/21/honda-fit-pricing-announced/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/08/detroit-auto-show-honda-launches-the-fit/">here</a>. <br />
<br />
[Sources: Consumer Guide and Edmunds]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/03/honda-fit-reviewed/">Consumer Guide, Edmunds review Honda Fit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=109810>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/03/honda-fit-reviewed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/605067/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/03/honda-fit-reviewed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car tests</category><category>Honda</category><category>Honda Fit</category><category>HondaFit</category><category>Hyundai Accent</category><category>HyundaiAccent</category><category>Subcompact</category><category>Yaris</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Arellano]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:04:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/605067/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/04/03/honda-fit-reviewed/605067/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>605067</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/10/hondafit_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
