<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[A gentler tap - IIHS suggests car bumper standards for light trucks]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="iihs.org"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/bumperheights_250.jpg" alt="" /></a>It's not a surprise that the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) would be backing a proposal that has the potential to lower the amount of damage vehicles sustain in crashes, and therefore lead to less costly repairs for insurers. What is surprising is the NHTSA's stubborn attitude about accepting outside suggestions. The proposal is simple enough; the IIHS recommends that trucks and cars use the same bumper standards for greater crash compatibility. Being cynical and following the money does lead one back to the fact that such a change would save the insurance industry a large sum, but so what? Saving the insurance industry money saves us poor saps a few nickels, too - or the rates continue to be just as expensive while the corporate robber barons pocket the increased profits. <br /><br />NHTSA has heard this argument before, rejecting petitions for porting the car bumper standard to light trucks in both 1984 and 1991. The IIHS is hoping that this time around, the fact that it's an organization proposing the change, and their new research, will sway the regulatory body in a more favorable direction. The IIHS used the Ford Explorer and its more car-compatible bumpers to demonstrate in tests that both vehicles in a crash would sustain less damage without exacting any penalty in usefulness or capability. NHTSA is already on the case of vehicle compatibility in a broad sense, and will likely try to roll any bumper-centric work into that effort. It would seem like a no-brainer to have cars and light trucks with bumpers that match up, but it's taken the past century of automotive production and dependence to get the idea any kind of traction. With that kind of glacial pace, we should start petitioning now in anticipation of a super-tight oil supply and incoming waves of sub-A class vehicles. We sure wouldn't want to get mauled by an Explorer on our way to get milk and bread in our Nano in 2030. <em>IIHS Press Release after the jump</em>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A gentler tap - IIHS suggests car bumper standards for light trucks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/">A gentler tap - IIHS suggests car bumper standards for light trucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1242460/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bumper compatibility</category><category>bumper height</category><category>bumper standards</category><category>BumperCompatibility</category><category>BumperHeight</category><category>BumperStandards</category><category>car bumper</category><category>CarBumper</category><category>iihs</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>insurance institute</category><category>insurance institute ...</category><category>InsuranceIndustry</category><category>InsuranceInstitute</category><category>InsuranceInstitute...</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>truck bumper</category><category>TruckBumper</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:21:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1242460/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/07/01/a-gentler-tap-iihs-suggests-car-bumper-standards-for-light-tru/1242460/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1242460</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/bumperheights_250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
